Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / July 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

live food

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jean H - 16 Jul 2003 02:30 GMT
Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
that would be double the torture for me and the food. I remember when I was
about eight I took a wild mouse out of a cats mouth [ after a bit of a
struggle]  when I told my dad he went mad on me said the cat could have
sratched or bitten me or the mouse could have bitten me and probably had
gangrene on its teeth  and could have made me very sick, but I can't bear to
see animals kill each other on these wildlife programmes even though I know
it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
to watch it    Jean P
m l briggs - 16 Jul 2003 02:45 GMT
I'm with you Jean.  I can't watch "nature" programs either.  When I was a little kid, I saw a dog
kill a kitten  and I saw some other horrible things that have stayed with me ever since.  MLB

> Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
> would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
> to watch it    Jean P
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 04:21 GMT
my cat loves to torture goldfish before eating them, I think its pretty
damn cool.

:Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
:would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
:it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
:to watch it    Jean P
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 04:25 GMT
on the other hand, my turtle is even more interesting when it comes to
eating live goldfish, it bites into the fishes tail and uses its front claws
to life up under the fishes gills and rip its head clean off, then eats
the body/tail part.  the head usually sits there bobbing on the top of the
water still breathing for 20 minutes up to an hour.  

nature rules!

:my cat loves to torture goldfish before eating them, I think its pretty
:damn cool.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
::it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
::to watch it    Jean P
Glyph - 16 Jul 2003 05:23 GMT
>Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
>would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
>to watch it    Jean P

Then it sounds like you shouldn't have a cat, as a cat is a predator
by nature's design. My indoor cat who has never hunted for food will
stalk, torture, then maim any moth that enters the apartment. Then she
will either present it to me or eat it live. Maybe a herbivore pet is
more for you if the idea of live food gives you the chills.

For the record, I am one of those folks who watched open heart surgery
as a kid, grew up with nature programs on PBS and the Mutual of Omaha
channel, so I'm not squeemish at all about blood and 'the circle of
life' so to speak, so it's kinda hard to me to see animals eating
animals as sickening.

Glyph

prickme2@_NO_SPAM_hotmail.com
http://glyphworks.crimsonblog.com
http://mundanechaos.keenspace.com
Jean H - 17 Jul 2003 04:45 GMT
my cat also an indoor cat his presents to me are leaves and storks off my
plants dead ones that is, and 'just for the record I saw open heart surgery
my husband fainted I didn't  I also saw lots of blood and guts when I was a
nurse that doesn't make me want to watch animals killing each other the
operations in a hospital are for giving life not taking it.jp

> >Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
> >would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> http://glyphworks.crimsonblog.com
> http://mundanechaos.keenspace.com
Shazza - 16 Jul 2003 17:29 GMT
Having read some of the messages here, Im ready to become a full-fledged
member of PETA.  I'm wondering if they would accept the membership of a cat
owner?

It's extremely unsettling and nauseous for me when pets as snakes are kept
and fed live mice.  Mice are biologically very similar to humans by their
DNA and that's why mice are used for drug experiments.  So what these pet
owners are doing is feeding an advanced mammal, a mouse, that nurses its
young, to a rudimentary reptile that lays a bunch of eggs.

It's one thing for a garter snake or any snake for that matter to exist on
insects or toads in the wild, but to keep these exotic animals captive in
homes and willingly feed them mice, that's another story.

--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html

Jean H wrote in message <3f14aab9@news.comindico.com.au>.
..
>Im sorry,but I coudn't come at having a pet that has to be fed live food it
>would starve first and I certainly couldn't let the cat play with it first
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
>to watch it    Jean P
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 17:43 GMT
ROFL.

:Having read some of the messages here, Im ready to become a full-fledged
:member of PETA.  I'm wondering if they would accept the membership of a cat
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
:>it happens indeed has to happen for animal life to survive I just dont want
:>to watch it    Jean P
Michelle Fulton - 16 Jul 2003 20:36 GMT
> It's extremely unsettling and nauseous for me when pets as snakes are kept
> and fed live mice.

That's what the snakes would be eating if they were in the wild and not
pets, so it's really six of one, half a dozen of the other.  Most people
can't stomach feeding live food and so so don't make pets of animals that
need that, but that doesn't make it wrong.

> Mice are biologically very similar to humans by their
> DNA and that's why mice are used for drug experiments.  So what these pet
> owners are doing is feeding an advanced mammal, a mouse, that nurses its
> young, to a rudimentary reptile that lays a bunch of eggs.

It's what snakes eat anyway.  It's just the way the food chain works.

> It's one thing for a garter snake or any snake for that matter to exist on
> insects or toads in the wild, but to keep these exotic animals captive in
> homes and willingly feed them mice, that's another story.

It's not really different.

M
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 20:43 GMT
If you think snakes eating live rats is bad, how about this...
from http://www.news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=768342003 :

Dolly creators begin mass slaughter

SHARON WARD

THE Scottish company involved in the creation of Dolly the sheep will today
begin a mass slaughter of its flock in an effort to cut costs in the face of
mounting financial problems.

PPL Therapeutics, the Midlothian-based biotechnology company, is to destroy up
to 3,000 transgenic sheep at two farms in East Lothian as it struggles to
survive after Bayer, the German pharmaceutical giant, pulled the plug on joint
drug trials.

...

The animals must be slaughtered and incinerated on the same day under strict
Home Office regulations to avoid environmental risks. Meat from the animals
cannot be sold as food.
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 20:58 GMT
I find it funny that someone would have no problem with a snake eating
a toad but be irately against a snake that eats rats.  Hows their logic
work, anyways?  "protect the cute furry animals, kill everything else!!"
or..?
Shazza - 16 Jul 2003 21:05 GMT
That's where I disagree with PETA, to a point, but that's not the real point
of my argument.  It's about humans tampering with nature.
--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html

dinkmeister wrote in message ...

>I find it funny that someone would have no problem with a snake eating
>a toad but be irately against a snake that eats rats.  Hows their logic
>work, anyways?  "protect the cute furry animals, kill everything else!!"
>or..?
Shazza - 16 Jul 2003 21:03 GMT
I'll add a link of my own:

http://www.peta-online.org/

and, the mutilated kitten story:

http://www.peta.org/alert/automation/AlertItem.asp?id=791

--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html

dinkmeister wrote in message ...

>If you think snakes eating live rats is bad, how about this...
>from http://www.news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=768342003 :
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Home Office regulations to avoid environmental risks. Meat from the animals
>cannot be sold as food.

Just more proof that humans have really messed up the planet!

~waiting for cats to rule the world~  m-e-o-w
Shazza - 16 Jul 2003 21:00 GMT
--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html

Michelle Fulton wrote in message ...

I understand your food chain argument, but what I'm saying is that humans
have intelligence and free will.  There is a big difference between a snake
existing in the wild and trying to fend for itself and a human willingly
keeping a pet snake and purchasing live caught and trapped bait that has
absolutely no chance of escape or survival and which the human feeds to the
snake.

>That's what the snakes would be eating if they were in the wild and not
>pets, so it's really six of one, half a dozen of the other.  Most people
>can't stomach feeding live food and so so don't make pets of animals that
>need that, but that doesn't make it wrong.

Not necessarily.  A snake might be darn lucky to even catch a mouse in the
wild.  The garter snakes around here subsist largely on insects and small
reptiles like toads, etc..  It's wrong because it's "not" nature.

>It's what snakes eat anyway.  It's just the way the food chain works.

The snake has to catch the food, first, not have it handed to them as a
human would.

>> It's one thing for a garter snake or any snake for that matter to exist on
>> insects or toads in the wild, but to keep these exotic animals captive in
>> homes and willingly feed them mice, that's another story.

It's extremely different because the human is trapping the mice to feed to
the snake.  Where's the level playing field?  It's analagous to trapped
people being fed to lions.

>M
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 21:11 GMT
:It's extremely different because the human is trapping the mice to feed to
:the snake.  Where's the level playing field?  It's analagous to trapped
:people being fed to lions.

Its fun to feed mice to snakes not to mention nourishing to the snake. and no,
its analogous to trapped buffalo being fed to lions.
Shazza - 16 Jul 2003 21:42 GMT
dinkmeister wrote in message ...

>:It's extremely different because the human is trapping the mice to feed to
>:the snake.  Where's the level playing field?  It's analagous to trapped
>:people being fed to lions.
>
>Its fun to feed mice to snakes not to mention nourishing to the snake. and no,
>its analogous to trapped buffalo being fed to lions.

If it's fun feeding mice to snakes and so nourishing, it must be barrels of
laughter feeding trapped buffalo, monkeys, or humans to lions.  Extremely
nourishing to the lions, as well.

--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html
dinkmeister - 16 Jul 2003 23:03 GMT
:If it's fun feeding mice to snakes and so nourishing, it must be barrels of
:laughter feeding trapped buffalo, monkeys, or humans to lions.  Extremely
:nourishing to the lions, as well.

If you say so, but since I'm not around lions that often I tend to just watch
it on Animal Planet (a cabletv channel)
Michelle Fulton - 17 Jul 2003 03:32 GMT
> There is a big difference between a snake
> existing in the wild and trying to fend for itself and a human willingly
> keeping a pet snake and purchasing live caught and trapped bait that has
> absolutely no chance of escape or survival and which the human feeds to the
> snake.

Unless you feed your cats a vegetarian diet, the animals used to produce the
commercial food for them have no chance to escape either.

M
Ivor Jones - 17 Jul 2003 06:13 GMT
> > There is a big difference between a snake
> > existing in the wild and trying to fend for itself and a human willingly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Unless you feed your cats a vegetarian diet, the animals used to produce the
> commercial food for them have no chance to escape either.

Cats are obligate carnivores, they cannot survive on a vegetarian diet,
they need animal proteins.

If you don't like the concept of what an animal eats, don't keep one, be
it a cat, snake or anything else.

Ivor
Michelle Fulton - 17 Jul 2003 13:34 GMT
> Cats are obligate carnivores, they cannot survive on a vegetarian diet,
> they need animal proteins.

I've heard of some people trying to feed their cats a vegetarian diet.

M
Paula Drennan - 18 Jul 2003 02:41 GMT
: I've heard of some people trying to feed their cats a vegetarian diet.
:
: M

I've heard of that too. and the cats usually end up malnourished from what i
understand. It is possible, just not recommended, and if you insist on
changing the cat's diet to suit your morality, do it only with a vet's
supervision. I'm not coming down on vegetarians, just on those that insist
the whole world, including animals, follow it. I'm more the kind of to each
his own.
Paula
Shazza - 18 Jul 2003 04:59 GMT
I've seen vegetarians who revel in the entertainment of feeding a mouse to a
snake.  Go figure...   I would never attempt to create a vegetarian cat or
feed him a meatless diet.  You could feed the cat bits of cheese as treats.
Is fish considered a meat item?

--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html

Paula Drennan wrote in message ...

>: I've heard of some people trying to feed their cats a vegetarian diet.
>:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>his own.
>Paula
Paula Drennan - 19 Jul 2003 03:51 GMT
: I've seen vegetarians who revel in the entertainment of feeding a mouse to a
: snake.  Go figure...   I would never attempt to create a vegetarian cat or
: feed him a meatless diet.  You could feed the cat bits of cheese as treats.
: Is fish considered a meat item?

I would say it is. considering it once had a heart beat. But if I remember
kosher law right, fish is considered a neutral food, it can be eaten with
both meat and dairy with no problems. But I could be wrong, it's been a
while since i've looked into it.
Paula
Shazza - 17 Jul 2003 15:58 GMT
I shouldn't be keeping one or two kittens, for that matter, but I miss my
lost cat (who was mostly outdoor), and I wanted the kittens to have a good
home and not be kept in a cage all day at the shelter.

--
Visit my new webpage - http://mywebpage.netscape.com/Aeris5000/cats.html
Ivor Jones wrote in message ...

>> > There is a big difference between a snake
>> > existing in the wild and trying to fend for itself and a human
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Ivor
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.