> > some way). Besides which we're not talking about survival rate...but life
> > expectancy. I have never known a cat to just die from being outside after
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> number you come up with is 3. The reason why they die is not relevant to
> this dicussion, just the fact that they do.
> Well there I am afraid that you are wrong...The person who originally asked
I'm afraid you are the one who is wrong.
> the question wanted to know what the typical life expectancy of a cat was.
> By reading their post I would asume that they very much love their cat and
> give it proper shelter and care. So if you are arguing with me that a cat
Even if a cat is loved and cared for, if he goes outside he's at risk of
the following: getting hit by a car, killed by a dog or a kid, getting
into fights with other cats that can transmit deadly diseases (you know
vaccines aren't 100% effective, right?), etc.
> who is well cared for and loved who is allowed to go outside typically lives
> only three years...I can't imagine where you get this figure.
I can't remember the exact source, but I recall a couple of articles in
scientific journals.
> Was based on personal experience. I personally have lived in the country
> most of my life. All
Most people nowadays live in cities, not in the country. Your
experiences might not be representative at all.
> the cats out there live outdoors...and they don't typically die before 3
> years... they all usually lasted well past 7-8 years. Sorry...but just
> because some internet site says so...does not make it the norm. You have to
And just because the cats you've had had *all* survived longer doesn't
mean it's not true.
> ask yourself where they get their figures from...did they get this figure
> from one small town and averaged it out over 50 cats??? If they get this
In order for it to be statistically significant, the population has to
be quite larger than that.
> figure by averaging out the numbers of cats who've passed away and decide
> that most are 3 years old...Well that's not conclusive enough for me. What
> you need to do is compare the age of most outdoor cats (living ones) and
> with the age of the indoor cats (yet again the living ones). If you are
Your methodology is incorrect. To calculate the actual life expentancy,
you don't just average the age of living cats. You need to take into
consideration all those who have died. Otherwise, each young cat that
dies *increases* the life expectancy calculation. This is obviously wrong.
> basing it in the fact that most outdoor cats are more likely to die earlier
> in life...YES I agree! There are a hell of lot more dangers outside than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wont argue that...but what about the cats that are still living
> outside...they far outweigh the number who died at three years.You are
You are incorrect. What they are saying is that *on average*, outdoor
cats live to be 3 years old. That number is calculated by adding all the
ages at which the cats in the population died, then dividing this number
by the number of cats.
> what??? They all lived past 3 years. So help me understand why it is you
> feel they only live to 3 years...is it because they get run over?? or is it
> because they may contract some disease?? Either way there are ways that you
It's not a matter of feeling, it's a matter of statistics and science.
> again...it does not automatically mean that they only live to about three
> years. Thats just bull!!!
No, it doesn't. It does mean however, that *on average*, outdoor cats
live to be 3 years old. Do you understand what I mean by *on average*?

Signature
Victor Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Melanie Lacasse - 14 Jan 2004 01:22 GMT
I'd like to know what country you live in. Here in Canada we have a VERY
large majority that live in the country!!! So yes my experience IS relevant.
My methodology as you so refer to it regarding the figures coming from
calculations done on dead animals is mostly accurate! Think about it...if
they're basing their figures on the fact that most outdoor cats that have
died have been three years old...then that means nothing. How many cats
lived past 3 years that are still living...that's what you need to look at.
Just because some scientist says it's so doesn't make it true. For crying
out loud they teach you that in high school...you have to think outside the
box and ask yourself how their statistics were obtained. Example...lets just
say it was based on 10,000 deceased cats...well lets say that the majority
of those were outdoor cats and they died at the age of 3. What does that
prove??...merely that most of the dead cats lived outside and that they were
young when they died. So what??? What if there's millions of other outdoor
cats living out there who are well passed 3 years old...I think that is more
relevant to question of how long you should expect them to live. Besides...I
still don't think that survival rate and life expectancy are the same. Same
as with people we have a certain life expectancy...(I wont start a debate on
what that figure is)...it's assumed that two people living under the same
conditions would live to be approximately the same age. However...if you're
talking survival rate...well now that varies...depending on different
factors. One example would be where you live. A war torn country for
example...well their deceased on average may be a lot younger than lets say
our deceased here in Canada. I have to say though Victor that there is no
point in you and me carrying on this argument. I know from past experience
with you that neither one of us will give in. This may become a never ending
debate. . Like I said here in Canada we have millions upon millions who live
in the country...so we have by far a lot more outdoor barn cats then lets
say a country that has a lot less agriculture and a lot more industrial
buildings and neighborhoods. So lets agree to disagree...You read some
articles that stated some statistics...I know from personal experience. You
think you're right and I know I'm right. So lets leave it at that. By the
way I just have to conclude that I get such a kick out these little debates.
Thanks for the chuckle. :)
Melanie (23 yrs) in Ontario Canada. :)
> > Well there I am afraid that you are wrong...The person who originally asked
>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> No, it doesn't. It does mean however, that *on average*, outdoor cats
> live to be 3 years old. Do you understand what I mean by *on average*?
Victor Martinez - 14 Jan 2004 02:13 GMT
> I'd like to know what country you live in. Here in Canada we have a VERY
> large majority that live in the country!!! So yes my experience IS relevant.
Not according to the UN:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w2612e/w2612eMap16-e.pdf
I live in the US, btw.
> My methodology as you so refer to it regarding the figures coming from
> calculations done on dead animals is mostly accurate! Think about it...if
No it's not. How do you think they calculate the life expectancy of
people? Here's how: they add up the ages of all the people who died in
one year. Then, they divide that number by the total number of people.
That is why the life expectancy of people in developed nations is way
higher than those in undeveloped nations (for the most part). You know
what's a good indicator of high life expectancy? Low child mortality.
Why? Basic math.
> they're basing their figures on the fact that most outdoor cats that have
> died have been three years old...then that means nothing. How many cats
> lived past 3 years that are still living...that's what you need to look at.
No it's not.
> Just because some scientist says it's so doesn't make it true. For crying
So who do you think is more qualified to define life expectancy?
Yourself? Your vet?
> relevant to question of how long you should expect them to live. Besides...I
> still don't think that survival rate and life expectancy are the same. Same
They're indeed not the same, but they are directly proportional to each
other.
> our deceased here in Canada. I have to say though Victor that there is no
> point in you and me carrying on this argument. I know from past experience
> with you that neither one of us will give in. This may become a never ending
I have facts and science behind me, you just have stubborness.
> debate. . Like I said here in Canada we have millions upon millions who live
> in the country...so we have by far a lot more outdoor barn cats then lets
But more people live in the cities, as proved by the map I refered to
above. See? You don't even seem to know the demographics of your own
country, yet you feel qualified to disregard statistical science!
> buildings and neighborhoods. So lets agree to disagree...You read some
> articles that stated some statistics...I know from personal experience. You
Ahhh... yes, anecdotal evidence trumps science.
> Melanie (23 yrs) in Ontario Canada. :)
Victor (31 years and a PhD in Engineering) in Austin, Texas

Signature
Victor Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
~*Connie*~ - 14 Jan 2004 02:24 GMT
Dear Melanie, the maker up of her own facts..
let me refer you to my original post..
Google it yourself if you don't want to believe the facts
check it out...
http://www.thedailycat.com/bringing/habitat/archive/bringing_in/
http://www.cahs-lansing.org/petcare/pc14.html
http://www.pet-tails.com/LPMArticle.asp?ID=145
http://www.runway.net/b/moonmaid/in-or-out.html
One decision every cat owner must make is whether or not their feline friend
will be allowed outdoors. Many people feel that keeping their kitties
indoors deprives them of a full life. However, one must consider that the
average life span of a totally outdoor cat is about a year and a half, while
a totally indoor cat is expected to live upwards of 15 years.\
and again.. simply because YOUR experience was that YOUR cat lived that
long, does NOT mean that anyone who lets their cat out can expect THEIR cat
to live that long. an outdoor cat has a DRAMATICALLY higher risk factors
that can cut their lives short. The professionals have done the
statistics.. you know statistics.. that really really hard math course that
a lot of professionals go to school and get degrees in.. they looked outside
of their own little reality and actually paid attention to these things and
came up with a little thing called a fact! for every cat that lives to 20,
seven cats can't make it past their first birthday, and I have STACKS AND
STACKS of files of dead cats that were killed by wild animals, cars, disease
and a wide variety of other reasons that prove you wrong.
simply because your cat was lucky, does not make you right.
this is NOT a giggling matter.
> I'd like to know what country you live in. Here in Canada we have a VERY
> large majority that live in the country!!! So yes my experience IS relevant.
[quoted text clipped - 126 lines]
> > Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
> > Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Melanie Lacasse - 14 Jan 2004 03:37 GMT
First I would like to say that from the beginning I said that this was based
on personal experience and I'm not merely making up facts. I simply stated
that most outdoor cats in my experience (maybe I should have said in Canada)
live past 3 years. I am merely trying to support my argument. I have no
doubt that a scientist would have more knowledge of how these tests are
conducted...but I also believe that there are a lot of variables. As said
before I (emphasis on the I) have never known an outdoor cat to pass away
before 3 years of age due to natural causes...and the unnatural ones have
been very few and far between. You're right Victor...there are more people
who live in the city than in the country...I think that's why there's a
difference between the two. My point was that here in Canada there are more
people who live in the country than perhaps in the U.S due to the fact that
we are highly dependant on our agriculture. So I do know the own
demographics of my country. I stand by what I said...only I have to modify
it slightly after speaking with my mother who confirmed that our two cats
who recently passed on where 22 and 17 years old and both of them lived
outside all there lives. And I've known many and I mean many who lived past
the age of 8, 9, 10 and onwards. Like I said the ones that didn't make it
were typically ones that had been hit by a motorist or injured by some young
punks who thought it would be fun to sling that cats in the air and use them
as target practice. But of course there are people like that anywhere. So my
answer to the person who asked the question originally is still the same.
This is my last rebuttal on this one. I am merely speaking from experience.
Did either of you grow up in the country with many outdoors cats growing up
with you? I choose to believe that they can live longer than 3 years and
they normally do. Of course as also said before if you live in a highly
urban area...the chances of you cats survival is a lot lower for the simple
fact that there are a lot more things for the cat to be weary of.
Sorry if my relating my personal experience has pissed you guys off...but I
guess if that's what you call making up facts...then guilty as charged. You
obviously are very closed minded if you can't even consider the possibility
that my own personal experiences are true. Believe what you chose to
believe...I obviously can not convince you otherwise...but as said
before...I never claimed to have a degree on the subject...I just offered up
my own relevant (as I believe everyone's opinions and experiences are
relevant) experiences for the persons reference. Is that so offending?? To
Connie I must add...what is a giggling matter is that you both are so hell
bent on shooting me down for relating my experience. The last time I checked
this news group was for people to do just that...not just for proffessionals
who refer merely to statistics. If someone here knows otherwise...let me
know...and I'll stop relating my experiences.
Melanie Lacasse (23)
Collections Officer
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
> Dear Melanie, the maker up of her own facts..
>
[quoted text clipped - 186 lines]
> > > Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
> > > Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Victor Martinez - 14 Jan 2004 04:36 GMT
> difference between the two. My point was that here in Canada there are more
> people who live in the country than perhaps in the U.S due to the fact that
> we are highly dependant on our agriculture. So I do know the own
Didn't you see the map I refered to? It clearly showed that in Canada,
more people live in the cities than in the country. Or perhaps the map
is wrong, because in your experience, more people live in the country?
Perhaps you ought to call your census office and correct their numbers
for them.
> the age of 8, 9, 10 and onwards. Like I said the ones that didn't make it
> were typically ones that had been hit by a motorist or injured by some young
> punks who thought it would be fun to sling that cats in the air and use them
> as target practice. But of course there are people like that anywhere. So my
And you don't think that those are risks that should be taken into
consideration? Nobody is saying that the 3 year figure applies only to
cats who die of natural causes. Accidents probably make a good chunk of
those early deaths.
> Sorry if my relating my personal experience has pissed you guys off...but I
> guess if that's what you call making up facts...then guilty as charged. You
You are indeed guilty of assuming that your experience is the ultimate
truth. You ought to get out more often.
> obviously are very closed minded if you can't even consider the possibility
> that my own personal experiences are true. Believe what you chose to
I believe your experiences are as you describe them. I also *know* that
just because you have had outdoor cats who lived to be 20+ years, that
doesn't mean that the average lifespan of outdoor cats is not 3 years.
My family had an outdoor cat (who never once saw a vet) who lived 15
years. The cat who came after him died at 6 months of age.
> bent on shooting me down for relating my experience. The last time I checked
> this news group was for people to do just that...not just for proffessionals
> who refer merely to statistics. If someone here knows otherwise...let me
> know...and I'll stop relating my experiences.
You just don't get it, do you? It's not about dismissing your
experience. It's about the fact that you believe that because your cats
live long lives, that means the figure scientifically calculated is wrong.
Do you understand this?

Signature
Victor Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com
Melanie Lacasse - 14 Jan 2004 05:36 GMT
> > difference between the two. My point was that here in Canada there are more
> > people who live in the country than perhaps in the U.S due to the fact that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Perhaps you ought to call your census office and correct their numbers
> for them.
Boy you really musn't have read my last response. I was not saying that more
people here lived in the country than the city...I was saying that there are
more people in Canada that live in the country than in lets say the U.S.
N o w d o y o u u n d e r s t a n d ? ? ? ?
> > the age of 8, 9, 10 and onwards. Like I said the ones that didn't make it
> > were typically ones that had been hit by a motorist or injured by some young
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> You are indeed guilty of assuming that your experience is the ultimate
> truth. You ought to get out more often.
Wow again!! I never said that my experiences were the ultimate truth!! I
said that they were just that...personal experiences. How the reader
inturprets them is up to them. Like I said in my last post...I thought
that's what this news group is for...so we can exchange personal experiences
and learn from each other. Maybe you should re-read my last response because
it obviously went right over your head!! I was teasing you when I said 'you
think you're right and I know I'm right'...you know like a joke...ever heard
of them? I was referring to our lovely little debate over breeding my
cat...remember??? I think it's been clear from the beginning that I don't
claim to know all and I don't have any degree that makes me a specialist
with animals. I'm just someone who's lived on an equestrian center and has
had more cats than I can count around me when I was growing up. So I feel I
have something to contribute here.
> > obviously are very closed minded if you can't even consider the possibility
> > that my own personal experiences are true. Believe what you chose to
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> live long lives, that means the figure scientifically calculated is wrong.
> Do you understand this?
I'm afraid that you're the one not getting it! The only thing I am saying is
that in MY experience all the cats I've known have lived longer than three
years. I personally feel that they do because I have known a hell of a lot
more of them have survived well over three years. I just wanted to know the
variables...you know where these stastics came from...how many cats...who
did the test...etc. Because if you just take things at face value
then...you're a sucker. You have to ask questions to get the facts or learn
anything. Like I said...it just depends on the variables. The links connie
supplied were great...sure they backed up her argument...but who conducted
these tests and how did they come up with those figures?
Lets do a little survey of our own right here...I'm going to make a new post
asking people to tell us how long their cats lived... indoor or outdoor.
Lets see what happens!
Melanie :)
NickKnight - 14 Jan 2004 03:56 GMT
>Even if a cat is loved and cared for, if he goes outside he's at risk of
>the following: getting hit by a car, killed by a dog or a kid, getting
>into fights with other cats that can transmit deadly diseases (you know
>vaccines aren't 100% effective, right?), etc.
And if the cat stays inside it could be hit by the house falling down
in an earthquake.
>Most people nowadays live in cities, not in the country. Your
>experiences might not be representative at all.
I have a relaitve who just had their dog killed by a car. They live
in an area that is about as rural as you can get.
--------------------------------------------
"It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing."
-------------------------Carter on Stargate
To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from
my e-mail address.