Cat Forum / General Topics / November 2003
How to DROP KICK a cat.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
catsSUCK@ihatecats.com - 29 Oct 2003 09:03 GMT Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid leather, steel toed boots.
Grab the cat by the tail and begin spinning it around in the air by its tail. Stand erect and straight with both feet firly planted on the ground. stop spinning the cat and hold it by the tail directly over your feet. Lift the foot of your choice and drop the cat at the same time you kick as hard as you can. If you are lucky, you can make a 100 yard field goal. If the cat lands in one piece, you get 3 points. If the cat lands in more than one piece, you get 5 points. If the cats head is dismembered from its body, you get 6 points.
Caution, this may be harmful to the cat and you may damage your boots if the claws get stuck in the leather.
NickKnight - 29 Oct 2003 16:35 GMT |>Re: How to DROP KICK a cat. Coming up in the next installment: how to drop kick a troll. -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate
To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address.
Craig Petersen - 29 Oct 2003 21:57 GMT > Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid > leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Caution, this may be harmful to the cat and you may damage your boots > if the claws get stuck in the leather. Even this is obviously a troll let's get one thing perfectly clear, people who commit such acts and post such sh.t are lower than child molesters. If I ever witnessed something like this the person responsible would at the very least, wind up in the hospital of injuries equaling or surpassing thoes they inflicted on such a defenceless animal.
I wouldn't care if I wound up in jail if it meant I could beat the sh.t out of an animal abuser. These are the same people who are the first to commit abuse against their wives or girlfriends, and even their kids.
So troll, go spew your bullshit somewhere else and quit hiding behind your internet provider. PUSSY!
catsSUCK@ihatecats.com - 30 Oct 2003 03:45 GMT >> Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid >> leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >responsible would at the very least, wind up in the hospital of injuries >equaling or surpassing thoes they inflicted on such a defenceless animal. OOOOOoooooohhhhhhhhhhh.......... I bet you think I'm really really scared and shaking in my steel toed boots.
Well PUSSY, Bring It On !!!! Lets boogie down and see who is more TOUGH. I already know I'll win, so lets make it a REAL challenge. The loser (that'll be you), must eat the entire head of your own damn cat, and eat it raw. My pit bull (that's a dog for you pussie loving dog haters), will shread the cat right before your very eyes, and shove the head into your mouth before he shreads you too, and serves your head to yo mama, who will be forced to eat YOUR whole head raw.
Do we got a deal tough guy??? I'll meet you at night in any dark alley in the Manhatten ghetto. Be sure to invite yo mama for security, but dont tell her about her free meal just yet. Then bring your cat for dessert.
Nadine - 30 Oct 2003 13:16 GMT Some jackass wrote:
>My pit bull (that's a dog for you pussy loving >dog haters), will shred the cat right before your >very eyes, and shove the head into your mouth >before he shreds you too, and serves your >head to yo mama, who will be forced to eat >YOUR whole head raw. It's ignorant people like you that give pits a bad name!!
Yeah I know, don't feed the trolls.
Craig Petersen - 30 Oct 2003 16:51 GMT >>>Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid >>>leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > Be sure to invite yo mama for security, but dont tell her about her > free meal just yet. Then bring your cat for dessert. Uhh... Is this the best you could come up with???
1. I never said I hated dogs, I like ALL animals. 2. When you post such drivel in a cats newsgroup expect to get the responces you have gotten. 3. Animal crulety is a FELONY in my state and in many others, Including NY. 4. Your "pit bull" could be seized as a dangerous animal and would be distroyed.
select from trolls where clue > 0; 0 rows returned
catsSUCK@ihatecats.com - 31 Oct 2003 16:43 GMT >>>>Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid >>>>leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > >1. I never said I hated dogs, I like ALL animals. Yeah, but you cant like dogs if you like cats. Its one or the other, and you have to choose. No one that likes cats can really like dogs. Its just like someone that likes Ford, hates Chevy, or Catholics hate Methodists or You like home football team but hate the other football teams. You can like dogs and pet birds, because birds are completely different, but you cant like both dogs and cats. So which do you like, and which do you hate? I like dogs, so I have no choice but to hate cats.
By the way, someone said on here "dont feed the trolls. Now that is animal abuse. Trolls need food too, and if you starve them, that is abuse.
>2. When you post such drivel in a cats newsgroup expect to get the >responces you have gotten. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >select from trolls where clue > 0; >0 rows returned Nadine - 31 Oct 2003 18:28 GMT Nadine - 31 Oct 2003 18:49 GMT >Yeah, but you cant like dogs if you like cats. Its >one or the other, and you have to choose. No >one that likes cats can really like dogs. LMAO This has to be one of the most ludicrous statements I've heard in years!! Dogs and cats are two totally different species so you can't really compare the two, but you can like both. I have 3 dogs and 5 cats and love them equally.
catsSUCK@ihatecats.com - 01 Nov 2003 00:10 GMT >>Yeah, but you cant like dogs if you like cats. Its >>one or the other, and you have to choose. No [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >really compare the two, but you can like both. I have 3 dogs and 5 cats >and love them equally. Well, if this is really true then I will have to confess. There was a cat that came up to me once while I was visiting someone and the cat sat on my lap and purred. I petted the cat and we became friends. I even wished I could have a cat, but when I looked at my pittie, I knew that could never happen because I always thought I was supposed to hate cats since I had a dog. I won't ever tell anyone that I really do like cats out of shame. I just tell them ways to hurt them. But I'd never really hurt one. I just pretend I do so the gang thinks I'm a cool dude. My pittie likes cats too, except when they hiss at him. I can never tell this to anyone though, or I will be banned from the gang and end up being dead. So I like cats but I must hate them, so I guess I hate them, except when no one else is watching.
Craig - 01 Nov 2003 07:08 GMT >>>Yeah, but you cant like dogs if you like cats. Its >>>one or the other, and you have to choose. No [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > gang and end up being dead. So I like cats but I must hate them, so I > guess I hate them, except when no one else is watching. Case in point, this is why I get so tired of this crap. The piece of sh.t that committed this act at the link below is just that, a PIECE of sh.t..
http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1801/
c.dossman - 01 Nov 2003 10:33 GMT > http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1801/ Horrible story! I'd shoot anyone that did harm to my kids. However, the story did make me wonder when it stated that the cat "was well cared for, declawed and neutered."
Craig - 02 Nov 2003 00:44 GMT >>http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1801/ > > Horrible story! I'd shoot anyone that did harm to my kids. > However, the story did make me wonder when it stated that the cat "was well > cared for, declawed and neutered." Agreed, if he hadn't declawed his cat he may have been able to inflict more severe wounds. But never the less, this cat NEVER deserved to be sawed in two... :(
Craig Petersen - 31 Oct 2003 21:26 GMT >>>>>Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid >>>>>leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > like, and which do you hate? I like dogs, so I have no choice but to > hate cats. Oh please! So by your logic since I don't have any birds I should hate/abuse/kill them?? I don't think so. Dude, I suggest you find something else to do besides posting incoherent statments like this. People will just think less of you. This is why my SQL sig at the bottom rings true...
> By the way, someone said on here "dont feed the trolls. Now that is > animal abuse. Trolls need food too, and if you starve them, that is [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >>select from trolls where clue > 0; >>0 rows returned Tavoni & Richard - 05 Nov 2003 02:17 GMT people who want to drop kick cats should be punished and drop kicked themselfs. sick. obviously you have some issues in your own personal life that you would want to harm another animal who did nothing to you.
>>>>>Start by putting on some good heavy leather gloves and a pair of solid >>>>>leather, steel toed boots. [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] >>select from trolls where clue > 0; >>0 rows returned Tom - 30 Oct 2003 09:03 GMT > I wouldn't care if I wound up in jail if it meant I could beat the sh.t > out of an animal abuser. These are the same people who are the first to > commit abuse against their wives or girlfriends, and even their kids. > > So troll, go spew your bullshit somewhere else and quit hiding behind > your internet provider. PUSSY! Here in Oregon, it's a felony and they do convict and issue jail time. Mostly because of the reasons you mentioned.
However, I just spent $3.5k on my cat and I'd glady do that much damage to this punks face...
Irish Murdoch - 30 Oct 2003 14:05 GMT > Even this is obviously a troll let's get one thing perfectly clear, > people who commit such acts and post such sh.t are lower than child > molesters. Low, certainly. But I'm not sure I can let that "lower than" claim go unchallenged. You don't *really* mean that, do you? If you do, you'd better have a good argument to back it up!
By *posting* an article talking about kicking cats, someone is morally worse than a child molestor? If you really believe that, you have an exceedingly strange world-view!
Irish
Craig Petersen - 30 Oct 2003 16:13 GMT >>Even this is obviously a troll let's get one thing perfectly clear, >>people who commit such acts and post such sh.t are lower than child [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Irish Oh yes I really mean it, look at it this way. Children have the ability to tell someone when they are being abused, cats, dogs, horses, etc cannot. Anyone who tourtures an animal is doing so because the chance of getting caught is pretty slim to none. In my book that would make them lower than a child molester.
http://www.pet-abuse.com/ Follow this link and look around, it is a very good web site that contains info on animal abuse and NAMES of the abusers them selves.
Irish Murdoch - 30 Oct 2003 16:32 GMT > Oh yes I really mean it, look at it this way. Children have the ability > to tell someone when they are being abused, cats, dogs, horses, etc [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > very good web site that contains info on animal abuse and NAMES of the > abusers them selves. Well, I wasn't suggesting that abusing animals is a *nice* thing to do: plainly, it's appalling. But look at what you wrote--you claimed that *posting* about kicking a cat made the poster lower than a child molestor.
I would take issue with the claim that "Anyone who tourtures an animal is doing so because the chance of getting caught is pretty slim to none". I'd question what on earth "because" means there! And I suspect that under any interpretation, the claim is simply empirically false. But let that rest ...
I think I'll close by humbly pointing out that you clearly have never seen the damage wrought by child abuse. I hope you never do.
Irish
Craig Petersen - 30 Oct 2003 17:51 GMT >>Oh yes I really mean it, look at it this way. Children have the ability >>to tell someone when they are being abused, cats, dogs, horses, etc [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Irish Well in closing I DO know first hand the damage of child abuse. During the late 60s early 70s I had been subject to numerous beatings from my father during his drunken rages. He also didn't like cats and encouraged people to run them down if they were in the road amoung other animals like opossums.
So the fact that I look down on animal abusers with contempt and distaine is in my book, justified..
Irish Murdoch - 30 Oct 2003 18:03 GMT > So the fact that I look down on animal abusers with contempt and > distaine is in my book, justified.. I didn't say that it wasn't justified. I too, as would any right-thinking person, look down on animal abusers with contempt and disdain. They're scum. But what I question is whether the posting of a message about how to drop kick a cat (a message, for all its bad taste, clearly meant ironically), renders its poster the moral inferior of a child abuser.
I'm sorry that you received repeated beatings. When I think of child abuse, I think of scenarios much worse than that (which isn't to downplay the pain and humiliation caused by your experiences at all), as those are the scenarios I have seen.
But that's getting too heavy.
May you be well and happy.
Irish
Tom - 31 Oct 2003 09:15 GMT > http://www.pet-abuse.com/ Follow this link and look around, it is a > very good web site that contains info on animal abuse and NAMES of the > abusers them selves. it's also a proven fact that people that harm animals are extremely likely to harm and even kill humans
Sum123 - 01 Nov 2003 13:20 GMT I, by no means, agree with or condone animal abuse. And I would defend an innocent and defenseless animal if I can. And I would reprehend someone abusing an animal.
But my question for you sentimental, sympathetic, and sensitive folks out there, is this: what have you done in defense of the hundreds of defenseless humans who are killed & abused everyday in so many different parts of the world? Including Phalastine, Afghanistan, and Iraq? Or is the American culture really as hypocritical as they say it is? Or is it just your way of silencing the voice of your conscience: defending animal rights because you are too weak, afraid, cruel, and indifferent to defend HUMAN rights? Or are ALL Arabs & Muslims considered dispensable and lower than animals in your civilized, democratic opinion? Or is the so-called "Freedom" an American monopoly?
Some of you here will gladly go to jail if this is what it takes to punish an animal abuser. I'm sure defending innocent humans will not make you go to jail in your freedom-oriented country. So what have you done for Phalastine before? What have you done for Iraq today? There are countries out there, including the same countries that are being abused, whose regimes will silently torture and even murder anyone who tries to defend his or her people's rights. Check Amnesty's website if you don't know what I'm talking about.
I really can't find any good reasons for this kind of behavior and public display of affection for animals at times of extreme abuse of human rights. They're all pathetic and sorry reasons really. Reasons that show you as either no more human than he who will really drop-kick a cat, or humans who are very absent-minded and absent-hearted.
If I'm righteous, I don't care about worldly flames; so imagine what it is like with wordy flames. --me, Finland
Sonam Dasara - 01 Nov 2003 18:43 GMT Aside from the fact that you are obviously trolling, one has nothing whatsoever to do with the other on this newsgroup. This newsgroup's subject matter is CATS, not about anything else, and posts about other subjects have no place here.
Is that clear?
You need not reply, because I have kill-filed you.
 Signature Cordially,
Sonam Dasara
> I, by no means, agree with or condone animal abuse. And I would defend > an innocent and defenseless animal if I can. And I would reprehend [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > If I'm righteous, I don't care about worldly flames; so imagine what > it is like with wordy flames. --me, Finland NickKnight - 01 Nov 2003 19:33 GMT |> But my question for you sentimental, sympathetic, and sensitive folks |> out there, is this: what have you done in defense of the hundreds of [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] |> democratic opinion? Or is the so-called "Freedom" an American |> monopoly? A couple of points. 1. My cats are a major part of my family. I've had my oldest cat for 19 years. 2. I'll have sympathy for the Palestineans the day after they cease saying the solution to peace in the mideast is to drive the Zionists into the sea. And after they get rid of that murdering tyrant Arafat. 3. The reason there are so many hungry people in the world is becuase you have leaders like Saddam or Kim Jong-il who spend mega bucks on the military but don't feed their people. The US shouldn't spend a dime until these leaders get their priorities straight. Did you look around Iraq and see how many statues of Saddam were made and how many castles he built? -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate
To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address.
Sonam Dasara - 01 Nov 2003 21:47 GMT Nick, why are you feeding this troll? I agree with what you say, but if everyone ignores this thread the troll will go away.
 Signature Cordially,
Sonam Dasara
> |> But my question for you sentimental, sympathetic, and sensitive folks > |> out there, is this: what have you done in defense of the hundreds of [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from > my e-mail address. Linda Terrell - 01 Nov 2003 20:47 GMT > I, by no means, agree with or condone animal abuse. And I would defend > an innocent and defenseless animal if I can. And I would reprehend [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > different parts of the world? Including Phalastine, Afghanistan, and > Iraq? snipity-do-dah for brevity
Perhaps we don't talk about that here because here is a CAT forum
LT
Magic Mood Jeep? - 01 Nov 2003 23:44 GMT I, for one, donated $$ to a Zoo that was sending supplies & people to help the abandoned animals at the Baghdad Zoo in Iraq.
 Signature The ONE and ONLY lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)? http://www.geocities.com/the_magic_mood_jeep/ http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
> I, by no means, agree with or condone animal abuse. And I would defend > an innocent and defenseless animal if I can. And I would reprehend [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > If I'm righteous, I don't care about worldly flames; so imagine what > it is like with wordy flames. --me, Finland Tony - 04 Nov 2003 06:07 GMT > I, by no means, agree with or condone animal abuse. And I would defend > an innocent and defenseless animal if I can. And I would reprehend [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > democratic opinion? Or is the so-called "Freedom" an American > monopoly? Because there are too many humans. so war/starvaton is natures way of cleaning up the excess human population. Just like animals in nature dying of hunger or getting killed by others. We are no different than other animals so I accept war/hunger as nature intended.
Linda Terrell - 04 Nov 2003 16:29 GMT
> Because there are too many humans. so war/starvaton is natures way of > cleaning up the excess human population. Just like animals in nature dying > of hunger or getting killed by others. We are no different than other > animals so I accept war/hunger as nature intended. Until you are the animal...
LT
|
|
|