> tomcat pretended :
>> I was *HORRIFIED* when I got to to know that american veterinaries
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> the nails of his new Siamese but not declawed. His apartment is
> immaculate and he will not tolerate anything out of place.
If all people thought in this humane and empathic way, the world would be a
better place - especially for animals. Declawing cats is cruel and
potentially dangerous. A clawless cat is less able to climb to safety or
defend itself if it has no claws. In the home, a cat can be given a
stropping 'tree' or a length of stout branch to sharpen and clean its claws.
Properly trained with this in place, no cat needs to scratch furniture or
textile furnishings. My cats are trained in this way and, just like the
gentleman you cited, I clip my cats' nails when they become over long. I
have no problems with damage within the house. True to say, my UK cats are
outdoor/indoor cats, which probably makes it easier. Since many US cats
seem to be indoor only cats, the obvious answer is to build them a play area
indoors - an adventure playground for cats, if you like.
There can be no circumstance - and no person - that could hope to persuade
me that declawing is justifiable. It is the most wretched abomination.
Spider
William Graham - 30 Jan 2008 20:19 GMT
>> tomcat pretended :
>>> I was *HORRIFIED* when I got to to know that american veterinaries
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Spider
I agree. My cats are indoor/outdoor cats, and they need their claws to
protect themselves from the raccoons and other stray cats, as well as the
occasional dog that gets loose and investigates our property. They also like
to climb trees, and sleep on my roof in the Summertime. They need their
claws for many things, and it is cruel to have them removed. If I had any
furniture that I wanted to protect from the cats I would put it in a spare
bedroom, and keep the door closed so the cats couldn't get to it.