> Anyone here involved in pet adoptions have thoughts on the Ellen
> Degenneres dog adoption battle?
>
> The woman from the dog adoption agency is now receiving alot
> of death threats.
Well, she should have had more common sense......I would have investigated
the other family before I enforced my rules with such a jerk-knee
reaction......If the other family was providing a good home for the dog,
then why take it away? - It seemed to me that they just took it away out of
spite because Degenneres "broke their rules". If the animal wasn't being
mistreated, then what's the beef?
>Anyone here involved in pet adoptions have thoughts on the Ellen
>Degenneres dog adoption battle?
>
>The woman from the dog adoption agency is now receiving alot
>of death threats.
It seems the adoption agency broke some laws in this process.
One they ripped the dog out of the hands of a child. Rule #1
is you can't touch a child. Touching the child is enough to
get you arrested.
Also it seems the adoption agency is guilty of fraud. Apparently
the adoption agency charged for having the dog fixed, a procedure
that was never done.
William Graham - 19 Oct 2007 01:04 GMT
>>Anyone here involved in pet adoptions have thoughts on the Ellen
>>Degenneres dog adoption battle?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the adoption agency charged for having the dog fixed, a procedure
> that was never done.
In any case, they are guilty of gross stupidity....This carries a jail
sentence that is considerably longer than normal stupidity......