Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Oscar the hospice cat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
studio - 26 Jul 2007 16:20 GMT
AP

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Oscar the cat seems to have an uncanny knack for
predicting when nursing home patients are going to die, by curling up
next to them during their final hours.

His accuracy, observed in 25 cases, has led the staff to call family
members once he has chosen someone.
It usually means they have less than four hours to live.

"He doesn't make too many mistakes. He seems to understand
when patients are about to die," said Dr. David Dosa in an interview.
He describes the phenomenon in a poignant essay in Thursday's
issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Many family members take some solace from it. They appreciate
the companionship that the cat provides for their dying loved one,"
said Dosa, a geriatrician and assistant professor of medicine at
Brown University.

After about six months, the staff noticed Oscar would make his
own rounds, just like the doctors and nurses. He'd sniff and observe
patients, then sit beside people who would wind up dying in a few
hours.

Dosa said Oscar seems to take his work seriously and is generally
aloof. "This is not a cat that's friendly to people," he said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19959718/
==================================

He's friendly to them when they're dieing and at their most vunerable
though.
He's protecting and comforting them in their final hours.
Very commendable.
studio - 26 Jul 2007 23:50 GMT
I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.

What I find interesting is that he seems to know
what purpose the hospice is for, and has taken
on the somewhat aloof personality the doctors
and nurses must use themselves.
Only his form of treatment is different.

The other amazing thing I heard was that Dr. Oscar
can be more accurate than human doctors.
Some of the human doctors would give a patient only
a few hours, and Dr. Oscar would sniff around and
walk out of the room...meaning the patient had more
time.
Dr. Oscars predictions were more accurate.
William Graham - 26 Jul 2007 23:53 GMT
>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> time.
> Dr. Oscars predictions were more accurate.

I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)
don't bother....send to this newsgroup - 27 Jul 2007 17:16 GMT
>I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)

No he was not.    He was probably reacting to a smell that
waffling through the air from the body, maybe
he sees the aura of the soul leaving the body,
maybe he sees or hears something humans can't.  
Maybe he is picking up on the suffering that
the patient is experiencing.

But for the umpteenth time the cat is not
killing the patients.   I'm irrititated at how
many news reports are implying that the cat
is killing the patients.

My cats can tell when I have a migrain.
jo bar - 27 Jul 2007 19:06 GMT
>>I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> My cats can tell when I have a migrain.

Now you don't really expect today's crop of neo-liberal
journalists to get  *anything*  correct, now do you?
don't bother....send to this newsgroup - 27 Jul 2007 21:39 GMT
>>>I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Now you don't really expect today's crop of neo-liberal
>journalists to get  *anything*  correct, now do you?

Especially the ones at Faux news.
jo bar - 27 Jul 2007 23:04 GMT
>>>>I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
> Especially the ones at Faux news.

Oh my, are you a certified wacko from the looney left?
Dr. Woodard - 28 Jul 2007 05:25 GMT
>Oh my, are you a certified wacko from the crazy right?
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 05:51 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com> another Usenet Psycho
wrote nothing of any importance to anyone in a message:
//  SNIP  ///

<PLONK>

gone!
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 21:16 GMT
>>I suspect he was poisoning the geezers, myself.....:^)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> many news reports are implying that the cat
> is killing the patients.

You are missing that they (the news reports) are just joking. (As I was only
joking) Whenever any Psychic predicts something, one's first instinct is to
investigate the possibility that they are actually causing it.....Of course,
a cat can't and wouldn't kill people, so it's only a joke.......
don't bother....send to this newsgroup - 27 Jul 2007 21:41 GMT
>> But for the umpteenth time the cat is not
>> killing the patients.   I'm irrititated at how
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>investigate the possibility that they are actually causing it.....Of course,
>a cat can't and wouldn't kill people, so it's only a joke.......

And it may have been funny the first time.   By the two hundredth time
it stopped being funny.
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 22:25 GMT
>>> But for the umpteenth time the cat is not
>>> killing the patients.   I'm irrititated at how
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> And it may have been funny the first time.   By the two hundredth time
> it stopped being funny.

Yes.....Especially if you answered all 200 posts......
jo bar - 27 Jul 2007 23:05 GMT
>>> But for the umpteenth time the cat is not
>>> killing the patients.   I'm irrititated at how
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> And it may have been funny the first time.   By the two hundredth time
> it stopped being funny.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ROTFLMAO!
studio - 27 Jul 2007 21:37 GMT
> But for the umpteenth time the cat is not
> killing the patients.   I'm irrititated at how
> many news reports are implying that the cat
> is killing the patients.

I've noticed that also.
I think they're trying to be funny, but don't realize this can lead
impressionable people to do and say more strange things.

Here's an animal actually doing good things for people, and they mock
it.

It may have something to do with the organized dog fighting racket
and
helping get another hero football player off from commiting a felony.

When I'm one day in my deathbed...send Dr. Oscar to care for me...
the dog fighters, football players and most everyone else can stay
the hell out of my room, as they're useless in life or death.
Dr. Woodard - 28 Jul 2007 05:29 GMT
>Here's an animal actually doing good things for people, and they mock
>it.
I also have to point out my mother in law was in a nursing home for
a number of years before she died.....it's sad how many are
in nursing homes and never have family members who visit.  I could
easily see where this cat was the only visitor they got in the last
year of their life.

The cat kept them company when no human would.
William Graham - 28 Jul 2007 08:34 GMT
>>Here's an animal actually doing good things for people, and they mock
>>it.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The cat kept them company when no human would.

From what I understand, the cat didn't particularly like people, and was
only working toward his degree in Oncology........
Hillary & Obama Bin Laden - 28 Jul 2007 16:55 GMT
Evern notice how the neo-liberal left-wing Democreep fascists
are always so filled with anger and hate at the world?

Dr Woodard =  Certified member of the Democrap nut base.

>>Here's an animal actually doing good things for people, and they mock
>>it.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The cat kept them company when no human would.
studio - 28 Jul 2007 17:40 GMT
Troll alert.
A reminder to members, don't feed the trolls,
they've nothing productive to contribute.
Hillary & Obama Bin Laden - 28 Jul 2007 18:22 GMT
> Troll alert.
> A reminder to members, don't feed the trolls,
> they've nothing productive to contribute.

Now that's funny, a troll putting out a Troll Warning.
Dr. Woodard - 29 Jul 2007 05:22 GMT
>Evern notice how the neo-fascist right-wing Republican fascists
>are always so filled with anger and hate at those who
>dare to disagree with them?
William Graham - 29 Jul 2007 07:15 GMT
> >Evern notice how the neo-fascist right-wing Republican fascists
>>are always so filled with anger and hate at those who
>>dare to disagree with them?

What hate? - Just explain to me why I should have to pay for your health
care? - If you can do that, I will be the first one to vote democratic on
11/08......
Dr. Woodard - 29 Jul 2007 15:00 GMT
>> >Evern notice how the neo-fascist right-wing Republican fascists
>>>are always so filled with anger and hate at those who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>care? - If you can do that, I will be the first one to vote democratic on
>11/08......

Then why should we pay for your oil company tax breaks (even with
massive profits), the roads you drive on, the police/fire coverage you
get, etc.?

What hate?  Just listen to the venom that spews forth when
republicans talk about Hilary.
Tom - 29 Jul 2007 17:58 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com>  spewing more of
his hate, wrote the following:

//////  moronic ravings  FLUSHED    ////////
William Graham - 29 Jul 2007 21:13 GMT
>>> >Evern notice how the neo-fascist right-wing Republican fascists
>>>>are always so filled with anger and hate at those who
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> massive profits), the roads you drive on, the police/fire coverage you
> get, etc.?

You shouldn't.....Nor have I asked you to. I am perfectly happy paying my
own way. All I ask is that you do the same.
   Not that I am against all welfare. If you were born without all your
arms and legs and faculties, then I don't mind if my government subsidizes
you with my money....But it is a fact that fewer than 2% of all the people
on welfare have any infirmity at all. they have, for the most part, all
their faculties, both physical and mental, and could easily work and pay
their own way.
   If the government doesn't buy our houses, food and clothes.....All
necessities.....Then why should they buy our health care?
   If you think that corporations like Exxon are taking inordinately high
profits than there is a good solution. They are publicly traded, so you can
buy their stock (I have) and take part in all those obscene profits
yourself......
   I don't hate Hillary....All I want her to do is take her hands out of my
pockets....Robin Hood was a fictional character. If he were alive today, he
would be nothing but another thief.
Upscale - 29 Jul 2007 21:57 GMT
"William Graham" <weg9@comcast.net> wrote in message
> Not that I am against all welfare. If you were born without all your
> arms and legs and faculties, then I don't mind if my government subsidizes
> you with my money....But it is a fact that fewer than 2% of all the people
> on welfare have any infirmity at all. they have, for the most part, all
> their faculties, both physical and mental, and could easily work and pay
> their own way.

You really are full of sh.t. The population disability statistics are
somewhere between 13-15% of the total USA population. That amount is
functionally equivalent in Canada. Take away those with less affecting
problems and you're left with a little less than 10%. Of those, better than
60% are unemployed due to physically being unable to work or just not being
able to find meaningful work because of prejudice. That 60% of the disabled
population works out to 6% of the total USA population being forced to
survive on welfare. And "survive" is an accurate description because the
amount of funds provided is meagre at best.

Your "facts" of 2% are just a delusional grab of numbers from your equally
delusional imagination. The only real fact coming out of you is that you're
so full misinformation that it's truly astounding.
Jack - 30 Jul 2007 17:41 GMT
> not being
> able to find meaningful work because of prejudice.

"Meaningful"? In other words, work that pays more than its economic
value. If they choose not to work, they don't get paid--what could be
more fair than that?

"Prejudice"? Something you can prove, or just another excuse for
dependency?

Jack
Upscale - 30 Jul 2007 22:00 GMT
"Jack" <baron58y@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> > able to find meaningful work because of prejudice.

Your comment shows your lack knowledge about the disabled. Few disabled
choose not to work. Most want to work and be accepted just for being
themselves. The fact that 60% of the disabled are unemployed is not because
they don't want to work, it's because they just can't get accepted for work
even if they can do the job. This is not guessing or conjecture, it's plain
fact. If you doubt what I'm saying, go to any statistics website that has
stats on disabled employment and read for yourself.

> "Meaningful"? In other words, work that pays more than its economic
> value. If they choose not to work, they don't get paid--what could be
> more fair than that?

Meaningful as being able to do work of greater economic value but not even
being considered for an interview because of a disability. Or managing to
get an interview and being able to do the job, but not getting hired because
of having a disability that makes one stand out.

> "Prejudice"? Something you can prove, or just another excuse for

How exactly would one prove something like that? No employer is going to
admit that they disqualified someone for working for their company on the
basis of disability, or gender or age, but we all know it exists and I've
certainly experienced it. Compare it to the glass ceiling that women
experience. The North American population is slightly over 50% female. Why
then does are the vast majority of high ranked jobs go to men? That's also
fact, not conjecture or guessing in any way or form. It's a prejudice that
we all know exists.

And yes to your next question, it is something I have personal experience
with since I've been using a wheelchair for 25 years. And yes, as a peer
support volunteer my experience mirrors comments I've heard from other
wheelchair users. Whether you want to believe it or not, certain types of
prejudice is ingrained. Even I feel it, leftover remnants from before I was
using a wheelchair. If I had the choice of hiring someone for a desk job, my
first inclination would be to hire the able bodied person because I'd
automatically feel they were more capable. It's an inclination I have to
force myself to control while I force myself to look solely at specific
capabilities for the job, while at the same time looking past any physical
difficulties.
Jack - 31 Jul 2007 21:06 GMT
>> "Meaningful"? In other words, work that pays more than its economic
>> value. If they choose not to work, they don't get paid--what could be
>> more fair than that?
>
> Meaningful as being able to do work of greater economic value but not even
> being considered for an interview because of a disability.

Then you should write what you mean. "Meaningful" does not convey
nearly the subjective emotional load with which you've tried to
burden it.

>> "Prejudice"? Something you can prove, or just another excuse for
>
> How exactly would one prove something like that?

Exactly my point.

You've clearly got challenges to deal with that the rest of us can
not fully appreciate. I trust cats are a joyful aspect of your existence.

I wish you all the best.

Jack
Upscale - 31 Jul 2007 21:14 GMT
"Jack" <baron58y@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> I trust cats are a joyful aspect of your existence.

The way I can reply to that is to say that I should have adopted a cat a
long, long time ago. The only downside is if I had I likely wouldn't have
the cat I've got now that I adopted two years ago. It makes me feel great
when I come home and my sweetie comes rushing up to greet me. Doesn't matter
if I've been gone eight hours or fifteen minutes, I get the same joyful
greeting from her when I come in the door. Can't ask for much more than
that.
Dr. Woodard - 29 Jul 2007 22:20 GMT
>    I don't hate Hillary....All I want her to do is take her hands out of my
>pockets....Robin Hood was a fictional character. If he were alive today, he
>would be nothing but another thief.

Then get your hands out of my pocket....including those theives at
Exxon.
William Graham - 30 Jul 2007 05:06 GMT
>>    I don't hate Hillary....All I want her to do is take her hands out of
>> my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Then get your hands out of my pocket....including those theives at
> Exxon.

The price of gasoline was 20 cents a gallon in 1950. At a 7.3% inflation
rate, the price of everything should double every 10 years (accountants rule
of 73) So, if you multiply 20 cents by 2 to the 6th power, gasoline should
reach $12.80 a gallon by 2010. It is only $3.00 a gallon right now, in 2007,
so I think the oil companies are doing very well and not charging an
excessive amount at all.  (It's over $5.00 a gallon in Europe)
   But the price of gasoline is dependent on a lot of things. It is a
function of supply and demand, and the supply is limited by oil refinery
output as well as crude supply. The demand is a function of the number of
gas guzzlers on the road and the miles we ask them to go. Right now, I
haven't seen much complaining about gas prices....My wife's grandson just
bought a huge Lincoln Continental that can't get much more than 10 MPG, and
both of our daughters have humongous Chevy Suburbans that also only get
about 10 mpg....So, If people really cared about the $3.00 a gallon
gasoline, they sure aren't showing it at the dealerships.....
   My father worked for Exxon for about 30 years, and he told me when he
retired in 1953 that the cost of making a gallon of gasoline held steady at
10 cents a gallon from 1900 to 1950. Any increase over all that time was
just the taxes and transportation costs. That's pretty amazing to me.....But
if you really believe that the oil companies are making excessive profits,
then why don't you buy some of their stock and become an owner of oil
companies yourself? After all, they are all publicly traded.
Hillary & Obama Bin Laden - 29 Jul 2007 14:25 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com>   who lacks any
originality, which is typical of a neo-liberal Dimocreep wrote in message:
///  FLUSHED  ///

More  Psycho-Babble from the deranged Fuckwit Dr Woodward.
don't bother....send to this newsgroup - 27 Jul 2007 17:11 GMT
>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>time.
>Dr. Oscars predictions were more accurate.

If he stayed in the room and curled up next to the
patient they had about 4 hours before they died.

BTw, there were doctors attending to the patients.
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 21:24 GMT
>>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> BTw, there were doctors attending to the patients.

Not surprising....Most of the doctors I have known would have trouble
knowing whether a patient is alive or dead.....Unless, of course, they had
an appointment to play golf with them that afternoon.......
jo bar - 27 Jul 2007 23:09 GMT
>>>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> knowing whether a patient is alive or dead.....Unless, of course, they had
> an appointment to play golf with them that afternoon.......

Imagine what healthcare will be like after Broom Hilda resuscitates
her failed national socialized medicine plans?
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 23:31 GMT
>>>>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Imagine what healthcare will be like after Broom Hilda resuscitates
> her failed national socialized medicine plans?

We can only hope that the American people have enough sense to keep her out
of the White House. But the socialists have a great advantage over
us.....They are always offering the people two chickens in every pot.....Ad
suppressing the fact that everything, especially those chickens, comes from
the taxpayer. But everybody thinks the taxpayers are someone
else.....Somewhere, up in the sky, there are a few rich taxpayers who will
be footing the bill for all those chickens........50 years ago, when rich
people were making $50,000 a year and up, my father figured out that if no
one who made over 50 grand a year had to pay any taxes at all, the rest of
us would only have to pay $100 a year more to make up for it.....That's how
few "rich people" there were. Rich people don't really support this
government.....Its the average wage earner that pays the bulk of the taxes.
The only difference between Hillary's socialized medicine and what we have
now, is that you will lose your choice of what doctor you get and what
hospital you can go to......That's what socialism does to a society....Takes
away their choices......
jo bar - 28 Jul 2007 00:39 GMT
>>>>>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> get and what hospital you can go to......That's what socialism does to a
> society....Takes away their choices......

Exactly, and that is also why liberal Dimocraps keep fighting school
*choice*
vouchers.  Imagine, with education vouchers, even 'poor' people would
have a choice where they sent their kids to school.   Can't have that
though,
the NEA is a major contributor to the Democrat party, and the NEA is
dead set against school vouchers.
William Graham - 28 Jul 2007 01:25 GMT
>>>>>>I believe I will refer to him Dr. Oscar from now on.
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> the NEA is a major contributor to the Democrat party, and the NEA is
> dead set against school vouchers.

Vouchers = less $ for public schools = bad for NEA. Our educational system
has sure deteriorated over my lifetime. (I am 71) When I was a kid, if I
wasn't sitting in my home room chair at 8:00 AM, my mother's telephone would
be ringing off the hook by 8:05 AM. In the 1980's my kids could cut school
for a whole quarter without me even knowing about it!

I liked New York State's regence examination system. Every class had a
regence examination that was designed at the state level, and at the
appointed time, every student in a particular class (geometry I, for
example) would sit down in a class somewhere at the exact same time, and
open his copy (with his name on it) and take the exact same test. So, it
didn't matter whether you attended class or not, or had a good teacher or a
bad one. You either did well in the regence exam or you didn't, and there
was no way to cheat. If you did well, then you knew the material, and that
was all that mattered......After cutting class all semester, I still got
97-1/2 % in the Trig regence exam, (for example) but I still had to repeat
trig before they would let me into Cal Berkeley, because those idiots didn't
accept the NY regence exam results......Had I gone to Yale or Harvard, or
MIT, I would have had no trouble.....:^)
Dr. Woodard - 28 Jul 2007 05:41 GMT
>Exactly, and that is also why liberal Dimocraps keep fighting school
>*choice*
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>the NEA is a major contributor to the Democrat party, and the NEA is
>dead set against school vouchers.

And with school choice if you're black, jewish, hispanic,
etc. you can pount sand,   School choice is only for the white,
christian, in this country.
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 05:52 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com> another Usenet Psycho
wrote nothing of any importance to anyone:
//   SNIPPED  /////

<PLONK>

gone!
Dr. Woodard - 28 Jul 2007 05:39 GMT
>We can only hope that the American people have enough sense to keep her out
>of the White House.
So your solution is to elect a reupublican whose solution is one step
below allowing the HMOS to shoot the patient with a gun and put them
out of the their misery.  (Or as John Silber said years ago
"When you're ripe....it's time to go.")

>ut the socialists have a great advantage over
>us.....They are always offering the people two chickens in every pot.....Ad
>suppressing the fact that everything, especially those chickens, comes from
>the taxpayer.
So when it comes to big profits for the HMOs it's alright to sacrfice
some lives.....

But everybody thinks the taxpayers are someone
>else.....Somewhere, up in the sky, there are a few rich taxpayers who will
>be footing the bill for all those chickens........
How about big oil who made gigantic profits, but still gets
huge subsidies from the taxpayer.

50 years ago, when rich
>people were making $50,000 a year and up, my father figured out that if no
>one who made over 50 grand a year had to pay any taxes at all, the rest of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>hospital you can go to......That's what socialism does to a society....Takes
>away their choices......

Rich people don't pay taxes....that is what tax shelters are for.
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 05:53 GMT
Dr Woodard   =     FUCKWIT
William Graham - 28 Jul 2007 08:31 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com> wrote in >

So your solution is to elect a reupublican whose solution is one step
> below allowing the HMOS to shoot the patient with a gun and put them
> out of the their misery.

My solution is to encourage people to save and buy their own health
insurance, just as they do their cars, houses, clothes and food, and not
steal money from the taxpayers to buy those things for them.....IOW,
capitalism over socialism. - I spent my life working and saving, and I
retired a millionaire at 61. While I was working (at a conventional,
silicone valley engineers job) my friends were spending every cent they made
on Porsches and fancy furniture for their apartments. Now these grasshoppers
are at the door demanding that the ants take them in for the winter. and
there is Hillary at the door behind them with her foot stuck in it, so I
will have to pony up the bucks to take care of them.

>>ut the socialists have a great advantage over
>>us.....They are always offering the people two chickens in every
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>
> Rich people don't pay taxes....that is what tax shelters are for.

I doubt if you have ever filled out a form 1040, so you have no idea what a
"tax shelter" is.

All I am saying is that Robin Hood was nothing more than a thief. Today,
every liberal democrat thinks I am the Sheriff of Nottingham, and wants to
steal from me to feed the poor. The "poor" had the same chance to save for
their futures as I did, and they shouldn't expect me to pay for them now.
The government doesn't buy your food, or your house, or your clothing. So
why should they buy your health care?

A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt
he proposes to pay off with your money.
-- G. Gordon Liddy
Upscale - 28 Jul 2007 10:08 GMT
"William Graham" <weg9@comcast.net> wrote in message
> capitalism over socialism. - I spent my life working and saving, and I
> retired a millionaire at 61. While I was working (at a conventional,
> silicone valley engineers job) my friends were spending every cent they made
> on Porsches and fancy furniture for their apartments.

Yup, quite the life you've had. You've been frugal and saved your money so
you could retire early and do what? Apparently, that "what" is spending
every night here in a cat newsgroup arguing about politics, socialism and
healthcare. Makes me glad I spent a good portion of my money and not just
sit around like you watching it earn interest for the banks.. At least I've
done things in my life and enjoyed doing them.

> steal from me to feed the poor. The "poor" had the same chance to save for
> their futures as I did, and they shouldn't expect me to pay for them now.
> The government doesn't buy your food, or your house, or your clothing. So
> why should they buy your health care?

And what if you'd been born with a disability making it mostly impossible to
save much money? What if you'd suffered some type of catastrophic accident
in your teens immediately putting you and your family into the poor house?
The cost of healthcare would have stolen your life long before you had any
chance of getting one. Yeah, I know, you'd still have worked hard and been
successful anyway so you could retire and do what? Obviously, it's feeding
your cat and sitting there while arguing in a cat newsgroup every night.
Yup, you're a success who does nothing in his old age accept thinking you're
making some type of contribution.

:)

And no, I'm not trying to be funny. I'm laughing at you and your "active"
life.
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 16:49 GMT
"Upscale" <upscale@teksavvy.com>,  who is on weekend pass from the
state booby-hatch & a certified member of the Dimocreep nut base wrote
the following in a message:
////SNIP//////

psycho-babble   FLUSHED

ROTFLMAO!
Dr. Woodard - 28 Jul 2007 05:32 GMT
>Imagine what healthcare will be like after Mitt Romney gets into office
>and allows HMOs to take Dr. kevorkian's place.   They can now legally do
>Kevorkian went to jail for.
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 05:55 GMT
"Dr. Woodard" <DrWoodardOnDS@hotmail.com> another Fuckwit
Usenet Psycho wrote in message:
/////  SNIP   ///////

FLUSHED  !

gone
studio - 28 Jul 2007 07:26 GMT
Political discussion is irrelivant to topic of discussion, or Dr.
Oscar.
too funny - 28 Jul 2007 16:49 GMT
> Political discussion is irrelivant to topic of discussion, or Dr.
> Oscar.

BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH  !
studio - 27 Jul 2007 04:45 GMT
A Day in the Life of Oscar the Cat
By Dr. David M Dosa, M.D., M.P.H.

Oscar the Cat awakens from his nap, opening a single
eye to survey his kingdom.  From atop the desk in the
doctor's charting area, the cat peers down the two
wings of the nursing home's advanced dementia unit.
All quiet on the western and eastern fronts.. Slowly, he
rises and extravagantly stretches his 2-year old frame,
first backward and then forward.  He sits up and
considers his next move.

In the distance, a resident approaches. It is Mr. P., who
has been living on the dementia unit's third floor for 3
years now.  She has long forgotten her family, even
though they visit her almost daily.  Moderately
disheveled after eating her lunch, half of which she now
wears on her shirt, Mrs. P. is taking one of many aimless
strolls to nowhere.  She glides toward Oscar, pushing
her walker and muttering to herself with complete
disregard for her surroundings.  Perturbed, Oscar
watches her carefully and, as she walks by, lets out a
gentle hiss, a rattlesnake-like warning that say, " leave
me alone."  She passes him without a glance and
continues down the hallway.  Oscar is relieved. It is not
yet Mrs. P's time and he wants nothing to do with her.

Oscar jumps down off the desk, relieved to be once
more alone and in control of his domain.  He takes a
few moments to drink from his water bowl and grab a
quick bite.  Satisfied, he enjoys another stretch and
sets out on his rounds.  Oscar decides to head down
the west sing first, along the way side stepping Mr. S.,
who is slumped over a couch in the hallway.  With lips
slightly pursed, he snores peacefully-- perhaps blissfully
unaware of where is now living.

Oscar continues down the hallway until he reaches its
end and room 310.  The door is closed, so Oscar sits
and waits.  He has important business here.

Twenty-five minutes later, the door finally opens and
out walks a nurses's aide carrying dirty lines.  "Hello,
Oscar," she says.  " Are you going inside?"   Oscar lets
her pass, then makes his way into the room, where there
are two people.  Lying in a corner bed and facing the
wall, Mrs. T. is asleep in a fetal position.  Her body is
thin and wasted from the breast cancer that has been
eating away at her organs.  She is mildly jaundiced and
has not spoken in several days.  Sitting next to her is her
daughter, who glances up from her novel to warmly greet
the visitor.  " Hello, Oscar. How are you today?"

Oscar take no notice of the woman and leaps up onto her
bed.  He surveys Mrs. T.  She is clearly in the terminal
phase of illness and her breathing is labored.  Oscar's
examination is interrupted by a nurse, who walks in to ask
the daughter weather Mrs. T is unconfortable and needs
more morphine.  The daughter shakes her head and the
nurse retreats.  Oscar returns to his work.  He sniffs the air,
gives Mrs. T. one finally look, then jumps off the bed and
quickly leaves the room.   Not today.

Making his way back up the hallway, Oscar arrives at
Room 313.  The door is open, and he proceeds inside.
Mrs. K. is resting  peacefully in her bed, her breathing
steady but shallow.  She is surrounded by photographs of
her grandchildren and one from her wedding day.  Despite
these keepsakes, she is alone.  Oscar jumps onto her bed
and again sniffs the air.  He pauses to consider the situation,
and then turns around twice before curling up besides
Mrs. K.

One hour passes.  Oscar waits.  A nurse walks into the
room to check on her patient.  She pauses to  note
Oscar's presence.  Concerned, she hurriedly leaves the
room and returns to her desk.  She grabs Mrs. K.'s chart
off the medical-records rack and begins to make phone
calls.

Within a half hour the family starts to arrive.  Chairs are
brought into the room, where the relatives begin their vigil.
The priest is c`called to deliver last rites.  And still, Oscar
has not budged, instead purring and gently nuzzling
Mrs. K.  A young grandson ask his mother, " What is the
cat doing here?"  The mother, fighting back tears, tells
him, " he is here to help grandma get to heaven."  Thirty
minutes later, Mrs. K.  takes her last earthly breath.  With
this, Oscar sits up, looks around then departs the room so
quietly that the grieving family barely notices.

On his way back to the charting area, Oscar passes a
plaque mounted on the wall.  On it is an engraved
commendation from a local hospice agency:

" For his compassionate hospice care, this plaque
is awarded to Oscar the Cat"

Oscar takes a quick drink of water and returns to his desk
to curl up for a long rest.  His day's work is done.  There
will be no more deaths today, not in Room 310 or  in any
other room for that matter.  After all, no one dies on the
third floor unless Oscar pays a visit and stays a while.
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 06:26 GMT
>A Day in the Life of Oscar the Cat
> By Dr. David M Dosa, M.D., M.P.H.
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
> other room for that matter.  After all, no one dies on the
> third floor unless Oscar pays a visit and stays a while.

But what really happened, was Mrs. K woke up, saw Oscar curled up sleeping
next to her, and died of fright!
don't bother....send to this newsgroup - 27 Jul 2007 17:20 GMT
>But what really happened, was Mrs. K woke up, saw Oscar curled up sleeping
>next to her, and died of fright!

In most of the cases the patient is un aware the cat is even there.
Many of them are not conscious, unaware of their
surroudings.    The families are grateful that Oscar
was there in the last hours.
William Graham - 27 Jul 2007 21:21 GMT
>>But what really happened, was Mrs. K woke up, saw Oscar curled up sleeping
>>next to her, and died of fright!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> surroudings.    The families are grateful that Oscar
> was there in the last hours.

Again, I was only joking....Didn't you ever see that Cheers episode where
Norm becomes the company "hit man" and gets the job of firing
people.....After a while, all he has to do is telephone an employee and they
scream and drop the telephone.......At the end, he telephones his own boss,
and he screams and drops the phone and runs for the door......
studio - 27 Jul 2007 21:42 GMT
> But what really happened, was Mrs. K woke up, saw Oscar curled up sleeping
> next to her, and died of fright!

The difference is; I know you're joking...I'm not so sure about other
peoples intentions.
Mommy of 2 - 29 Jul 2007 01:04 GMT
It has amazed me since I started coming to this site how convoluted some of
the responses get.  

I saw this article and we talked about it at work.  Animals have such an
uncanny sense about them.  There are many stories about dogs and cats that
seemingly can tap into energy that we humans can only imagine.  What a
special kitty Oscar is...and how nice he can offer comfort to these patients
during their last hours on earth.

>AP
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>He's protecting and comforting them in their final hours.
>Very commendable.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.