 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / General Topics / August 2006Prevent The Cruelty
Please excuse this offtopic post but I am trying to spread awareness of atrocities being commited to animals. If you love animals as I do, please help prevent the cruelty by boycotting IAMS and EUKANUBA products for their inhumane treatment of animals. Please spread the word! http://www.iamscruelty.com/ Anything that has to do with PETA is not to be trusted > Please excuse this offtopic post but I am trying to spread awareness of > atrocities being commited to animals. If you love animals as I do, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.iamscruelty.com/ > Anything that has to do with PETA is not to be trusted Why do you say that? s97 >> Anything that has to do with PETA is not to be trusted > > Why do you say that? > > s97 Let me rephrase that when It comes to anything that PETA supports or protest or is involved in should be suspect and approached with suspicion. Too many of their supporters and the agencies efforts go about doing the right thing in the wrong fashion [snip] > Let me rephrase that when It comes to anything that PETA > supports or protest or is involved in should be suspect > and approached with suspicion. Too many of their > supporters and the agencies efforts go about doing the > right thing in the wrong fashion But is that necessarily their fault..? Ivor > [snip] > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Ivor If the agency; which they do too many times than not, goes on their supporters words and information they provide without checking it out yes it is "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message > But is that necessarily their fault..? Of course it is. There's too many instances where they've turned their animal protection into over zealous actions. Do you excuse al-Qaeda for any of their actions just because they believe without question in what they're doing? Peta doesn't fall into the al-Qaeda category for killing and true carnage, but in the relatively more benign animal rights world, they're up there. I would still like to have more "concrete" information about how not- good PETA is. I only read about them in the papers occasionally, so I am neither for nor against them. *Matthew says: >Too many of their supporters and the agencies efforts go about >doing the >right thing in the wrong fashion. How vague is this? What agencies? What right thing? What wrong fashion? Please post some actual examples so I can have a look at what they say. *Upscale says: > ...There's too many instances where they've turned their > animal protection into over zealous actions. Please give an example of their "over zealous actions", I look forward to reading the references. What is over zealous? Have they torched houses or labs? > Do you excuse al-Qaeda for any of their actions just because they believe > without question in what they're doing? Peta doesn't fall into the al-Qaeda > category for killing and true carnage, but in the relatively more benign > animal rights world, they're up there. Of course not. al-Qaeda are a load of mediaeval sh.ts who kill animals and women for fun. But how clever of you to equate PETA with al-Qaeda, so that PETA will be tarred with the same brush. I'm still asking, what has PETA done that is so bad? I'm not that au fait with the animal rights lobbies, but it does seem to me that you're casting a few aspersions - although I could be wrong, please see your human rights lawyer if I've insulted you in any way - :-). An answer to my question, with concrete evidence of ill-doing, would be appreciated. As an animal-lover, I need to know. I wait to be convinced or converted. I use cruelty-free shampoo, or so it says on the label. How do we even know? s97 Start here with these http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2003/gibson/qtr3/0903.htm http://www.peta-sucks.com/ http://www.americandaily.com/article/8002 http://www.michiganforums.com/forum/showthread.php?p=909092 >I would still like to have more "concrete" information about how not- good > PETA is. I only read about them in the papers occasionally, so I am [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > s97 PETA = nutbags not to be trusted. :> Anything that has to do with PETA is not to be trusted : :Why do you say that? : :s97 someone97 off reading up and not arguing for a while then Start here with these http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2003/gibson/qtr3/0903.htm http://www.peta-sucks.com/ http://www.americandaily.com/article/8002 http://www.michiganforums.com/forum/showthread.php?p=909092 Iams is nasty, cruel food. I feed Hills, then again my 3 cats can be a tad nasty at times... > PETA = nutbags > not to be trusted. Unfortunately, that is not helpful. Actually, there are several known sane members (my favorite being Elvira!). Can you be more specific? Regards, Jaime G.  SignatureSi mi tía tuviera ruedas sería una bicicleta. preventthecruelty@hotmail.com wrote in news:1153621683.010594.195100 @p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com: > Please excuse this offtopic post but I am trying to spread awareness of > atrocities being commited to animals. If you love animals as I do, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.iamscruelty.com/ BOYCOTT NOTHING! SKIN AND EAT CATS!, AND GRIND THEIR BONES, PETA IS A TRAITOR ORGANZIATION THAT SHOULD HANG FROM THE GALLOWS. ALL HAIL FREE SPEECH AND ALL HAIL FEKLAAR, WHO IS MIGHTY! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.