> Hi all. I just found this group and I need your help. I have cat 17 year
> old cat name Phloyd. I have had him with me his whole life. He started
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> thanks
Is it time for me to let him go? Am I selfish to let him
>> go or am I selfish to have him stay? This is so hard. When do you
>> know it's time?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Of course I could be wrong and he may have several years left, I hope
> I am, but at the same time don't let him suffer if he's in pain.
I agree....take him to the vet for them to determine whether he's suffering
or just fading away. If he's not in a lot of pain, you may want to let him
pass at home; so many people forget that it's okay to do this if the pet is
not unduly suffering, to let them just pass away naturally instead of
putting them down. But ultimately, it's your decision, but that decision
will be easier made if you get the vet's educated opinion on the state of
his health and whether he's in a great deal of pain or not.
I know it's a difficult situation, and you have my most heartfelt sympathy.
It doesn't sound like you're being selfish at all, because you want to make
a decision based on Phloyd's best interests, and that shows a lot of love.
More hugs and purrs for you both,
Ann
--
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak
Troy - 03 Sep 2003 11:39 GMT
> Is it time for me to let him go? Am I selfish to let him
> >> go or am I selfish to have him stay? This is so hard. When do you
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> More hugs and purrs for you both,
> Ann
I agree too. You need to get a vet's opinion on Phloyd's current state
of health. There is obviously something wrong if he hasn't eaten for a
few days - how serious it is or if it can be treated is only something
a vet can tell you. Don't put this off because it may be something
that can be treated or cured relatively simply - and minor illnesses
can be quite devestating for a 17 year old kitty.
At the end of the day the only important factor is his quality of life
and that should be your only reason for making a decision either way.
If Phloyd is any sort of pain or discomfort, for which there is no
relief or cure, it is unfair to let him endure it but, as long as he
is happy and content, you are not being selfish in any way.
I know how hard this must be for you...best of luck for you and Phloyd
and let us know what happens...
Troy.
bewtifulfreak - 03 Sep 2003 11:49 GMT
> At the end of the day the only important factor is his quality of life
> and that should be your only reason for making a decision either way.
> If Phloyd is any sort of pain or discomfort, for which there is no
> relief or cure, it is unfair to let him endure it but, as long as he
> is happy and content, you are not being selfish in any way.
I wholeheartedly agree, though I just wanted to mention that degree of
discomfort is also a factor; if he has a few aches and pains, but his
condition is treatable to the point where he is otherwise in generally good
condition, I don't think that necessarily merits putting him down. A lot of
people, particularly the elderly, live with chronic pain, but if it is to a
managable degree, are able to lead otherwise satisfying lives. So do
discuss all this with your vet, and see what he or she thinks. If he is in
a great deal of untreatable pain, then of course, it would be kinder to free
him of his misery, but if he just has a few aches and pains, but is
otherwise able to be returned to a decent state of health, than it might be
just as kind to let him carry on and enjoy the rest of his life with you.
Good luck in making the best decision for Phloyd.
All the Best,
Ann
--
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak