> For Pete's sake Laurie there were only two responses to my request before
> my "thank you to both" if you had read them you would realize they were
> far too technical and lengthy to try to quote besides it would be easier
> to just read the enclosures they sent me. I would have thought that "both"
> would be self explanatory as to what respones I was referring to since
> there were only two beforehand.Geeeeeeeess. DEW
You know what, DEW??
Your attitude sucks. *Kindly* asking you in this thread was because you do
not quote in *any* threads. It's netiquette, DEW. It makes for easier
reading for everyone. *YOU* are the first person to point out someone's
faults in here, you expect replies when someone frantically posts about a
sick cat, etc., etc.
Just remember, I asked you to quote text AND wished you a good day. Stop
your whiny "geeeees" crap and catch a clue. :-/
L.
Knucklehead - 12 May 2005 16:46 GMT
If that's the way you feel--kindly DO NOT respond to my posts.Thank you
very much.You must be having a VERY bad day because your attitude
sucks.ADIOS DEW
~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 12 May 2005 16:54 GMT
> If that's the way you feel--kindly DO NOT respond to my posts.Thank you
> very much.You must be having a VERY bad day because your attitude
> sucks.ADIOS DEW
It is imperative that the proper info. be given out when a child is in the
picture as THE POSTER stated.
Actually, I'm having a lovely day, thankyouverymuch. The kind of day I
wished YOU yesterday, asamatteroffact. Why, today is my birfday!!
HAND!!!
<Off to smell the roses I got> ;o)

Signature
·.·´¨ ¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
Laurie
((¸¸.·´ ..·´
-:¦:- ((¸¸ ·.·
*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~* Aloha!!!!!
"There is no remedy for love but to love more"...
~~Henry David Thoreau