Update on Wisconsin's potential cat killing...

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 22 Apr 2005 23:47 GMT

It made it to People's magazine. Thankfully it's NOT going to make it as a
law. However, the goofy guy who said "we can't have Wisconsin known as the
cat killing state" (not a direct quote) needs to be shot himself. In the
eyes of a cat, I tend to look fur-ther than what PEOPLE think!!

I look at what the cat thinks!!

Signature

·.·´¨ ¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
Laurie
((¸¸.·´ ..·´
-:¦:- ((¸¸ ·.·

*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~* Aloha!!!!!

"Well behaved women rarely make history!!"

Reply to this Message

Alun L. Palmer - 24 Apr 2005 16:37 GMT

> It made it to People's magazine. Thankfully it's NOT going to make it
> as a law. However, the goofy guy who said "we can't have Wisconsin
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I look at what the cat thinks!!

That's good news. The cat hunting idea was monstrous.

Reply to this Message

Kalyahna - 25 Apr 2005 01:51 GMT

> It made it to People's magazine. Thankfully it's NOT going to make it as a
> law. However, the goofy guy who said "we can't have Wisconsin known as the
> cat killing state" (not a direct quote) needs to be shot himself. In the
> eyes of a cat, I tend to look fur-ther than what PEOPLE think!!
>
> I look at what the cat thinks!!

Considering that the guy you're not-exactly-quoting is WI governor Jim Doyle
and he's said he would veto it if it ever crossed his desk, I'd rather not
shoot him. He's on our side, and he isn't even owned by any cats.

Reply to this Message

~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ - 25 Apr 2005 22:09 GMT

> > It made it to People's magazine. Thankfully it's NOT going to make it as
> a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and he's said he would veto it if it ever crossed his desk, I'd rather not
> shoot him. He's on our side, and he isn't even owned by any cats.

You missed my point entirely. It's how he said it. I don't care who he is.
Mr. Doyle sounded more concerned for the state then the cats (and feral
cats).

That's why I typed "I look at what the cat thinks"!!

(Done with this thread).

Signature

·.·´¨ ¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
Laurie
((¸¸.·´ ..·´
-:¦:- ((¸¸ ·.·

*~*LiveLoveLaugh*~* Aloha!!!!!

"Well behaved women rarely make history!!"

Reply to this Message

Alun L. Palmer - 27 Apr 2005 15:49 GMT

>> > It made it to People's magazine. Thankfully it's NOT going to make
>> > it as a law. However, the goofy guy who said "we can't have
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> (Done with this thread).

That's true enough. He beleives that cat hunting would be bad for the image
of the state of Wisconsin. He's right of course. He may not be a cat lover,
but we ought to take what we can get if it will stop the bill.

Reply to this Message

Larry R Harrison Jr - 03 May 2005 04:56 GMT

However, articles I have read have made it clear that residents in rural
areas have long shot annoying cats anyway and good enough for them. Well,
trapping is better, but if shooting works, why not? I own a cat and love it
and would never shoot it, but I'd think nothing of shooting a cat in the
rural areas if the owners refused to control them and they kept hopping on
my new car & getting paw prints on the hood or they were getting in the
trash and making a mess.

> "Well behaved women rarely make history!!"

Neither do well behaved men, but since when is that an excuse to be a bitch
or a jackass?

LRH

Reply to this Message