Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Keeping cat off counter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martin - 19 Oct 2004 20:56 GMT
               Hello.  I have a 3 yr old cat that loves to jump on the
kitchen counters.  Is there any safe and effective way to train her to stay
off the counter?  She only goes on the counter when no one is in the room.
Thanks
MMarty
Diana - 19 Oct 2004 17:29 GMT
Martin at socrates039@yahoo.com wrote on10/19/04 7:56 PM:

> Hello.  I have a 3 yr old cat that loves to jump on the
> kitchen counters.  Is there any safe and effective way to train her to stay
> off the counter?  She only goes on the counter when no one is in the room.
> Thanks
> MMarty

There are a lot of things you can try if you have the patience; but after
three years, the short answer is, "No."  :)
Signature

Diana, who has tried them all

Portal To My Pages
http://bellsouthpwp.net/d/r/drdrive/

Sara - 20 Oct 2004 04:08 GMT
When she jumps on the counter spray her and say No eventually she will stop.
Sara

> Martin at socrates039@yahoo.com wrote on10/19/04 7:56 PM:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> There are a lot of things you can try if you have the patience; but after
> three years, the short answer is, "No."  :)
Raffles - 19 Oct 2004 20:59 GMT
>                Hello.  I have a 3 yr old cat that loves to jump on the
> kitchen counters.  Is there any safe and effective way to train her to
> stay off the counter?  She only goes on the counter when no one is in the
> room.
> Thanks
> MMarty

use double sided sticky tape, or tin foil, orange peel, there are lots of
things that will make is less appealing :-)
Odor Destroyer - 20 Oct 2004 02:06 GMT
Very simple.  Purchase a CatScram electronic cat repellent and put it on
your counter.  You hear nothing, the cat thinks a smoke alarm goes off
everytime he jumps on you counter.  Works great for all but the most
fearless of cats.

Disclaimer: I sell these and wish you would buy them from me.  But even if
you buy them elsewhere, they are a great product.

Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com

               Hello.  I have a 3 yr old cat that loves to jump on the
kitchen counters.  Is there any safe and effective way to train her to stay
off the counter?  She only goes on the counter when no one is in the room.
Thanks
MMarty
NobodyMan - 21 Oct 2004 01:39 GMT
How would you like it if every time somebody spotted you doing
something they didnt like they set off a smoke detector right next to
your ear?

This is cruel punishment to the cat.

>Very simple.  Purchase a CatScram electronic cat repellent and put it on
>your counter.  You hear nothing, the cat thinks a smoke alarm goes off
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thanks
>MMarty
OldKenGoat - 21 Oct 2004 12:13 GMT
Can't say I'd like it a bunch, but it sure as hell would keep me from
jumping on the counter! :+)

> How would you like it if every time somebody spotted you doing
> something they didnt like they set off a smoke detector right next to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> one is in the room. Thanks
>> MMarty

Signature

~~
What most RepuGlicans don't seem to
understand: "Rats and roaches live by
competition under the laws of supply and
demand. It is the privilege of human beings
to live under the laws of justice and mercy."
- Wendell Berry

To reply JUNK the NOJUNK!

Odor Destroyer - 21 Oct 2004 14:50 GMT
The CatScram functions by taking advantage of a cats natural skittishness,
not by inducing pain and discomfort. That's why I mentioned that it "works
great for all but the most fearless of cats."

And it's far from cruel.  The audio is similar in pattern to a smoke alarm,
but not nearly as intense.  A smoke alarm is designed to wake the whole
house from a dead sleep.  A CatScram is designed to be largely inaudible at
about 12-15 feet and cannot penetrate common household objects like walls,
furnuture, etc.  It's omnidirectional, and cannot be heard outside the audio
cone (think flashlight beam).  I have one in a closet (previously used as an
ad-hoc litter box) about 8 feet from their food.  The CatScram can be
blaring away while they eat, and they meander around oblivious to it's
presence.  That is, unless they decide to sneak into the closet again. :)
You could actually use it to protect only half of a desk if you located it
carefully.  Try that with a smoke alarm.

Another example:  If the CatScram is located on a kitchen counter, the cats
can wander the floor at will while you work in the kitchen.  Your body
movement will keep the CatScram activated almost constantly, but your cats
will be unaware of it's presence unless they decide to venture onto the
countertop.  It's a very good way to keep a curious cat away from a hot
stove, knives, and other dangerous items that they may leap up onto/into.

All that said, it's not a punishment.  It's causes no pain or physical
discomfort and only takes once or twice before a cat associates the area
with danger and steers well clear.

Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com

How would you like it if every time somebody spotted you doing
something they didnt like they set off a smoke detector right next to
your ear?

This is cruel punishment to the cat.

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:06:53 GMT, "Odor Destroyer"
<service.REMOVEME@odordestroyer.com> wrote:

>Very simple.  Purchase a CatScram electronic cat repellent and put it on
>your counter.  You hear nothing, the cat thinks a smoke alarm goes off
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thanks
>MMarty
Sara - 21 Oct 2004 18:05 GMT
Anything you do is really "cruel" according to someone it the world.
However I have always used a water bottle (water in it) and spray her
everytime you see her on the counter and say no! I know someone would
say that is cruel too, but oh well.
Sara
Raffles - 21 Oct 2004 21:17 GMT
> Anything you do is really "cruel" according to someone it the world.
> However I have always used a water bottle (water in it) and spray her
> everytime you see her on the counter and say no! I know someone would
> say that is cruel too, but oh well.
> Sara

If it works Sara then its a good idea, one of mine shakes his head and
carries on strolling!
I don't think its cruel
NobodyMan - 22 Oct 2004 00:55 GMT
>Anything you do is really "cruel" according to someone it the world.
>However I have always used a water bottle (water in it) and spray her
>everytime you see her on the counter and say no! I know someone would
>say that is cruel too, but oh well.
>Sara

That doesn't afflict pain on the animal.  The signal emitted by the
device in question can, and probably does, cause the animal pain,
however low a level.  You might as well just smack them in the ears
with a spoon.
Odor Destroyer - 22 Oct 2004 04:45 GMT
>> "can [cause pain]"

If you took the device and held it to their ear like a headset, that is a
possibility.  As would a walkman cranked up to full volume.  Either action
would also cause you pain even though in the case of the CatScram you would
unable to discern the signal causing the pain.

>> "probably does [cause pain]"

From your repeated insistence that it is cruel and does in fact cause pain,
is it safe to assume that you have worked with the device (or similar) or
done any type of research to substantiate your accusations?  No? Well I
have, as has the manufacturer whom I know quite well.  The device causes no
more pain than my clock radio causes me at 5am.  Unpleasant, yes.  Alarming,
yes. Painful, no.  In truth, you could get similar results by hooking a
clock radio to a motion detector.  But that would annoy the heck out of the
humans that a cat allows to co-habitate with them. So, we chose a frequency
that is inaudible to humans. 25khz to be exact.  Just outside the hearing
range of most humans.  But, if it's any consolation there are rare
occurences of young female humans who have reported being able to hear the
signal.

FWIW, if the device functions by pain as opposed to fear then why are all
cats not affected? Are exotic breeds (often unaffected) simply unable to
feel pain?

All that said, I'm always receptive to any insights you might have to offer
as to specifically how this device causes pain and what we might do to
correct it.

Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com

>Anything you do is really "cruel" according to someone it the world.
>However I have always used a water bottle (water in it) and spray her
>everytime you see her on the counter and say no! I know someone would
>say that is cruel too, but oh well.
>Sara

That doesn't afflict pain on the animal.  The signal emitted by the
device in question can, and probably does, cause the animal pain,
however low a level.  You might as well just smack them in the ears
with a spoon.
NobodyMan - 23 Oct 2004 02:22 GMT
>From your repeated insistence that it is cruel and does in fact cause pain,
>is it safe to assume that you have worked with the device (or similar) or
>done any type of research to substantiate your accusations?  No? Well I
>have, as has the manufacturer whom I know quite well.  The device causes no
>more pain than my clock radio causes me at 5am.

You compared this to a Fire Alarm for the cat's ears.  I'm sure if I
replaced your Alarm Clock with a Fire Alarm, it WOULD cause you a
great deal of pain.  Fire alarms drive me nuts, and they cause my ears
to ache within a very short time span.  Your analogy is comparing
apples to buildings - the two situations you are comparing have
nothing in common.

> Unpleasant, yes.  Alarming, yes. Painful, no.  In truth, you could get similar results by hooking a
>clock radio to a motion detector.  But that would annoy the heck out of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>occurences of young female humans who have reported being able to hear the
>signal.

No, that isn't of any consequence to me.  Putting it up in the
ultrasonic frequency area just causes the cat more pain/irritation.

Why can't we just coexist with our feline friends?  When I catch my
kitty somewhere I don't want him, I just give him a stern NO and take
him off whatever it is he shouldn't be on.  He's going to do and go
where he wants regardless.
Odor Destroyer - 25 Oct 2004 02:03 GMT
NobodyMan,

  You have grasped onto an analogy that I made and decided to ride that
horse till it's dead.  You neither have, nor do you seek, any facts,
experience, or data to invalidate or confirm your assertations. You speak
from a position of ignorance, and it appears that you do so willingly.
Since you have no intention of letting the facts distort your perception of
reality, I see no reason to discuss this issue any further.

Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:45:27 GMT, "Odor Destroyer"
<service.REMOVEME@odordestroyer.com> wrote:

>From your repeated insistence that it is cruel and does in fact cause pain,
>is it safe to assume that you have worked with the device (or similar) or
>done any type of research to substantiate your accusations?  No? Well I
>have, as has the manufacturer whom I know quite well.  The device causes no
>more pain than my clock radio causes me at 5am.

You compared this to a Fire Alarm for the cat's ears.  I'm sure if I
replaced your Alarm Clock with a Fire Alarm, it WOULD cause you a
great deal of pain.  Fire alarms drive me nuts, and they cause my ears
to ache within a very short time span.  Your analogy is comparing
apples to buildings - the two situations you are comparing have
nothing in common.

> Unpleasant, yes.  Alarming, yes. Painful, no.  In truth, you could get
> similar results by hooking a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>occurences of young female humans who have reported being able to hear the
>signal.

No, that isn't of any consequence to me.  Putting it up in the
ultrasonic frequency area just causes the cat more pain/irritation.

Why can't we just coexist with our feline friends?  When I catch my
kitty somewhere I don't want him, I just give him a stern NO and take
him off whatever it is he shouldn't be on.  He's going to do and go
where he wants regardless.
NobodyMan - 26 Oct 2004 00:18 GMT
>NobodyMan,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Philip
>http://www.OdorDestroyer.com

Fine.  I read this differently; you've been backed into a corner
having painted yourself there with false logic and bad analogies.  Now
you are going to take your toys and go home.

Whatever.

If I am ignorant it is merely because YOU haven't presented enough
facts about your device.  I based my comments on how YOU described it
and how the cat would perceive it.

For you enlightenment, I do have extensive knowledge on how sounds
affect the environment.  I do have some idea of what I am talking
about.

I guess, though, that you are right.  This thread is dead.
Odor Destroyer - 25 Oct 2004 02:16 GMT
For the rest of those follwing this thread;

> You compared this to a Fire Alarm for the cat's ears.  I'm sure if I
> replaced your Alarm Clock with a Fire Alarm, it WOULD cause you a
> great deal of pain.  Your analogy is comparing
> apples to buildings - the two situations you are comparing have
> nothing in common.

The analogy may in fact be comparing apples to oranges, but you must also
understand that I'm trying to describe what something that a human cannot
ever hear sounds like.  Kind of like trying to describe a symphony orchestra
to a deaf man.  I chose the analogy of a smoke alarm because if you plot it
on an audiometer the warbling pattern looks similar to that of a smoke
alarm.  A CatScram can't possibly sound like an actual smoke alarm since
they operate in two completely audio ranges.

>Putting it up in the
> ultrasonic frequency area just causes the cat more pain/irritation.

"Ultrasonic" defines a region of the audio spectrum relative to the human
capability to discern sound.  25khz is not ultrasonic to a cat, it is in
fact well within the normal feline audio range.  To say that the device is
"ultrasonic" to a cat, is as incorrect as saying that the upper range of a
gifted singer is "ultrasonic" to a human.

The frequency of a sound has nothing to do with it's ability to cause pain
and/or ear damage.  Pain and/or ear damage are a result of audio pressure or
as we more commonly call it "volume".  An ultrasonic signal (25khz) at 60db
would cause no pain at all, while a bass drum (60hz) at 140db could burst
your eardrums. To assert that a signal is somehow dangerous because of of
it's frequency is simply not factual.

Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com
rangitotogirl - 27 Oct 2004 20:46 GMT
> Very simple.  Purchase a CatScram electronic cat repellent and put it on
> your counter.  You hear nothing, the cat thinks a smoke alarm goes off
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Disclaimer: I sell these and wish you would buy them from me.  But even if
> you buy them elsewhere, they are a great product.

Actually I can hear those things and that high pitched sound annoys me a
lot.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.