"Paul Bearer" <Don't Bother...send to usenet> wrote in message
> died from the Wheat Gluton. That having been said the company
> will most likely skate through unscathed. After all if you
> had a pet die a year or so ago you most likely already buried it/
There are class action lawsuits in process, but they take time to go through
the courts. As well, a number of pets were made sick but did not die. Many
of those people are part of the class action suite both for initial
recompense, damages and the cost of providing ongoing care for those pets
that now have chronic medical problems because of the gluten.
Matthew - 29 Dec 2007 17:10 GMT
> "Paul Bearer" <Don't Bother...send to usenet> wrote in message
>> died from the Wheat Gluton. That having been said the company
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> recompense, damages and the cost of providing ongoing care for those pets
> that now have chronic medical problems because of the gluten.
I am part of several class action lawsuits. The law firm said that we will
be lucky to get our vet bills if even a certain amount with all the parties
involved. The law firm said good luck with the company from China. The
factory has been destroyed and several high end members are dead or in jail.
The company which I got the pet food that made my Spirit sick; luckily he
survived due to him eating only a small amount and me rushing him to the ER.
They have offered a settlement on the vet bills, the cost of a certain
amount of future visit vet bills and some compensation; a very small amount
for my lawyer expenses. If I accept this it leaves them out of the class
action part but still allows me to be involved with the suing of the other
companies involved. My personal lawyer said it is a great deal and to take
it still gives me the option of being able to get compensation from the
other companies.
I am lucky enough not to worry about the money I had to spend. All my pack
will always be taken care of no matter what. I think I am going to take the
settlement and anything I get form the others will go to the donation box.
Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
releasing the information sooner. If people were smart they would have
not thrown away the food like MenuFoods told you to do. I saved
mine...ALL 6 CASES...
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:51:48 -0500, "David" <davidd31...@yoowhoo.com>
> wrote:>I heard of someone filing a $2M lawsuit and I also remember hearing that
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> problem. (i.e. some of those responsible for the
> toy recalls were shamed so badly they killed themselves.
William Graham - 11 Feb 2008 06:21 GMT
> Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
> HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>> problem. (i.e. some of those responsible for the
>> toy recalls were shamed so badly they killed themselves.
Not only that, but there are two parts to every suit. First, who is
responsible, and second, how much is it worth? - Proving responsibility
would probably be easy....After all, they admitted it, and recalled the
food. But the, "how much is it worth" is another matter. Unless your pooch
was Rin Tin Tin, or Lassie, he/she isn't really worth anything....So, if you
won, they would just offer to buy you another dog (or cat) of like value.
Diana - 13 Feb 2008 01:16 GMT
In article
<591acc54-183c-451a-9cf4-188bea300f27@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
> HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
> releasing the information sooner. If people were smart they would have
> not thrown away the food like MenuFoods told you to do. I saved
> mine...ALL 6 CASES...
So right. Glad you saved it.
On a related note, it's always amazed me that my daughter's dog's vet
asserted that the dog's kidney failure and seizures could not have been
the result of eating food that was on the list of contaminated foods.
What in the world did that vet have to gain? It was like the way the
human medical profession is usually completely unwilling to admit that
one of their own might have screwed up. But I don't get why a vet would
participate it that sort of thing under the circumstances that
prevailed, what with Chinese pet food producers being the identified bad
guys. It wasn't a question of wanting to sue, anyway. It's just that
the dog so clearly must have been damaged by the food, and the vet so
clearly didn't want to go there. Weird.
Diana