Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is anyone following the wheat gluten lawsuits against Menu Foods or ChemNutra?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David - 29 Dec 2007 06:51 GMT
Hi:

When the wheat gluten concerns first appeared I was luckily not effected by
it directly.  My cat, Buddy, got extra hugs, I felt sadness when hearing
many of the stories, and I hoped for pets everywhere to pull through.

My condolences to everyone who lost a furry friend.

I was talking with someone yesterday who mentioned he lost a cat because of
the tainted wheat gluten.  After feeling sympathetic for him I asked if he
did anything afterwards.

If Buddy died due to a successful company's negligence I would be furious.
I'm not sure if I would have tried to file a lawsuit or not but I am curious
what has happened, legally?

I heard of someone filing a $2M lawsuit and I also remember hearing that
Menu Foods was suing ChemNutra.

Has there been any progress?  Are there any blogs or websites chronicling
the cases associated with this?

David
William Graham - 29 Dec 2007 08:00 GMT
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> David

In September they were thinking of taking it to the federal courts.....See:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribunereview/news/fayette/s_527177.html

These things take lots of time.....Best to follow it every few months
through Google.......
David - 29 Dec 2007 08:19 GMT
>> Hi:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> These things take lots of time.....Best to follow it every few months
> through Google.......

Well if no one's blogging it, I could start.  It seems when the mainstream
media hits the web they make it rather difficult to find blogs about /
websites dedicated to an issue!

There's quite a bit to read out there but yea I can see it's going to be
some time before any rulings are made.

It makes me sick to hear that the worth of pets is taken as the same value
they are purchased for....  Hopefully some people can get some cash for
emotional distress.  Negligence just isn't acceptable in my opinion when
lives are at stake- human or furry!
Paul Bearer - 29 Dec 2007 16:30 GMT
>I heard of someone filing a $2M lawsuit and I also remember hearing that
>Menu Foods was suing ChemNutra.
>
>Has there been any progress?  Are there any blogs or websites chronicling
>the cases associated with this?
My understanding is there were probably millions of pets who probably
died from the Wheat Gluton.    That having been said the company
will most likely skate through unscathed.   After all if you
had a pet die a year or so ago you most likely already buried it/
cremated it.   So many of those deaths won't be tracked back to
the wheat gluton.   Even if you went through the time/effort/
expense to get the body of your dead could they even
test for Wheat Gluton this late in the game?

At this point you're probably talking a lot of time/money/
effort to find the cause of death, not to mention a
painful journey that some pet owners may not want to
venture on.  

Yeah there probably were millions of pets killed by it
but proving it is another matter.  I'd be surprised
if anyone at this point could.

BTW, this is now viewed in a whole different
light considering the millions of toy recalls
from toys made in China.

Remember the wheat gluton came from China, and
in the wake of the toy recall it wouldn't surprise me
in the least to find China already took care of the
problem. (i.e. some of those responsible for the
toy recalls were shamed so badly they killed themselves.
Upscale - 29 Dec 2007 16:48 GMT
"Paul Bearer" <Don't Bother...send to usenet> wrote in message
> died from the Wheat Gluton.    That having been said the company
> will most likely skate through unscathed.   After all if you
> had a pet die a year or so ago you most likely already buried it/

There are class action lawsuits in process, but they take time to go through
the courts. As well, a number of pets were made sick but did not die. Many
of those people are part of the class action suite both for initial
recompense, damages and the cost of providing ongoing care for those pets
that now have chronic medical problems because of the gluten.
Matthew - 29 Dec 2007 17:10 GMT
> "Paul Bearer" <Don't Bother...send to usenet> wrote in message
>> died from the Wheat Gluton.    That having been said the company
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> recompense, damages and the cost of providing ongoing care for those pets
> that now have chronic medical problems because of the gluten.

I am part of several class action lawsuits.  The law firm said that we will
be lucky to get our vet bills if even a certain amount with all the parties
involved. The law firm said good luck with the company from China.  The
factory has been destroyed and several high end members are dead or in jail.
The company which I got the pet food that made my Spirit sick; luckily he
survived due to him eating only a small amount and me rushing him to the ER.
They  have offered a settlement on the vet bills, the cost of a certain
amount of future visit vet bills and some compensation; a very small amount
for my lawyer expenses.  If I accept this it leaves them out of the class
action part but still allows me to be involved with the suing of the other
companies involved.  My personal lawyer said it is a great deal and to take
it  still gives me the option of being able to get compensation from the
other companies.

I am lucky enough not to worry about the money I had to spend. All my pack
will always be taken care of no matter what.  I think I am going to take the
settlement and anything I get form the others will go to the donation box.
disneyfamilyof4@gmail.com - 10 Feb 2008 19:40 GMT
Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
releasing the information sooner. If people were smart they would have
not thrown away the food like MenuFoods told you to do. I saved
mine...ALL  6 CASES...

> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:51:48 -0500, "David" <davidd31...@yoowhoo.com>
> wrote:>I heard of someone filing a $2M lawsuit and I also remember hearing that
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> problem. (i.e. some of those responsible for the
> toy recalls were shamed so badly they killed themselves.
William Graham - 11 Feb 2008 06:21 GMT
> Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
> HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>> problem. (i.e. some of those responsible for the
>> toy recalls were shamed so badly they killed themselves.

Not only that, but there are two parts to every suit. First, who is
responsible, and second, how much is it worth? - Proving responsibility
would probably be easy....After all, they admitted it, and recalled the
food. But the, "how much is it worth" is another matter. Unless your pooch
was Rin Tin Tin, or Lassie, he/she isn't really worth anything....So, if you
won, they would just offer to buy you another dog (or cat) of like value.
Diana - 13 Feb 2008 01:16 GMT
In article
<591acc54-183c-451a-9cf4-188bea300f27@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> Both my dogs were hospitalized. One was on deaths door (A GREAT BIG
> HUG TO THE DOCS WHO SAVED HER LIFE). This could have been avoided by
> releasing the information sooner. If people were smart they would have
> not thrown away the food like MenuFoods told you to do. I saved
> mine...ALL  6 CASES...

So right. Glad you saved it.

On a related note, it's always amazed me that my daughter's dog's vet
asserted that the dog's kidney failure and seizures could not have been
the result of eating food that was on the list of contaminated foods.  
What in the world did that vet have to gain?  It was like the way the
human medical profession is usually completely unwilling to admit that
one of their own might have screwed up.  But I don't get why a vet would
participate it that sort of thing under the circumstances that
prevailed, what with Chinese pet food producers being the identified bad
guys.  It wasn't a question of  wanting to sue, anyway.  It's just that
the dog so clearly must have been damaged by the food, and the vet so
clearly didn't want to go there.  Weird.

Diana

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.