Cat Forum / General Topics / December 2007
Vets need to be consulted
|
|
Thread rating:  |
MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 00:58 GMT I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read. That is, someone will post a message to us asking, "What is the problem?" - or possibly - "What can I do?"
These are good forums for general information and advice, but we are *not* veterinarians. Moreover, many of the questions relate to problems that even a professional could not solve without an on-site examination. Worse, some of the problems have either been neglected for a long time or involve issues that clearly call for immediate medical care.
Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)! Call a vet ASAP when you detect a problem, in the same way that you would want medical care for yourself. You are not only causing additional pain/discomfort for your cat when you delay and wait for unknown people on a newsgroup to respond, but the irony is that you often cause additional expense for yourself. Many problems that can be easily and inexpensively remedied can quickly become much more serious and more expensive when treatment is delayed.
MaryL
Photos of Duffy and Holly: >'o'< Duffy: http://tinyurl.com/cslwf Holly: http://tinyurl.com/9t68o Duffy and Holly together: http://tinyurl.com/8b47e
Sherry - 12 Nov 2007 01:15 GMT On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> wrote:
> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same > problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read. That [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > MaryL Absolutely. Just as personal anecdotal evidence; *every time* I have delayed or put off a trip to the vet the problem only grew worse, and cost the cat more suffering and a higher vet bill in the long run. Like everybody else, I hate putting them through the trauma of the vet trip, and of course, like many others, I am on a tight budget. Most recent was Bosley's chin acne, usually a minor thing. If I'd taken proper care of him at the beginning of the outbreak, it wouldn't have turned into a huge, swollen, infected abscess.
Sherry
u - 20 Nov 2007 22:21 GMT > On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> for a long time or involve issues that clearly call for immediate >> medical care. Of course all of the above is just conjecture on your part. And conjecture in the direction of the "take em to the vet" kneejerk reaction. Which job do you hold in a vet office? Or how do you profit from that advice. It's wrong. As I pointed out MOST of the medical problems you take an animal to the vet for can be handled at home with some reading and medication available from various sources without a profit-mongering vet feeding from the trough. Just successfully treated an upper respiratory infection, saving myself big bucks and, more importantly, I deprived some unprofessional jackass who is primarily in the business to make money his due. Tons of medical information for animals on the net and tons of places to get medications needed for treatment. Don't believe these "take em to the vet" people here that work in vet offices often.
>> Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)! Call a vet >> ASAP when you detect a problem, Gee the vets here don't have compassion, why should we? and more importantly why should we give them our money when we can do most of it ourselves?
<more BS snipped>
>> MaryL >> > Absolutely. Just as personal anecdotal evidence; *every time* I have > delayed or put > off a trip to the vet the problem only grew worse, and cost the cat > more suffering yeah, cuz you're maybe not intelligent enough or cannot make enough of a committment or are too afraid to treat your pet?
Matthew - 20 Nov 2007 22:37 GMT "u" <u@u.com> wrote in message
Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 29 Nov 2007 14:13 GMT Matthew presented the following explanation :
> "u" <u@u.com> wrote in message > > Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality Sometimes though it does seem that they have a license to print money.
 Signature Count Baldoni
Matthew - 29 Nov 2007 17:32 GMT > Matthew presented the following explanation : >> "u" <u@u.com> wrote in message >> >> Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality > > Sometimes though it does seem that they have a license to print money. ROFLMAO so true
William Graham - 21 Nov 2007 02:53 GMT >> On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > yeah, cuz you're maybe not intelligent enough or cannot make enough of a > committment or are too afraid to treat your pet? Sometimes you need something to do while you wait for the availability of a vet. Our cat had ear mites, or some bug or other in her right ear....It was Friday evening. (Isn't that always the case?) So, my wife searched the internet and found some advice that said olive oil will sometimes work as a "home remedy" for ear mites. She put some warm olive oil in Junie's ear, and it worked quite well until a couple of days later when we were able to take her to the vet. I am 72 years old, and I have yet to get a toothache on Monday morning....Every toothache I have ever had has appeared on Friday evening.....So help me God.......If I ever get to confront my maker, that will be my first question....Why the hell does everything happen on Friday evening??!!
IBen Getiner - 28 Nov 2007 11:44 GMT > On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> > wrote: <snip>
> Sherry- Hi, Cherry... :)
IBen Getiner
John Doe - 12 Nov 2007 02:07 GMT When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply reply stating that opinion.
> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same > problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read. That [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > X-Complaints-To: abuse suddenlink.net > Xref: prodigy.net alt.cats:225876 alt.pets.cats:48836 rec.pets.cats.anecdotes:539269 rec.pets.cats.health+behav:466847 MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 02:38 GMT > When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply > reply stating that opinion. Of course. And I have done that, many times -- and so have many others. The point is, that really shouldn't be necessary, at least not in many cases. It should be common sense to consult a vet under the types of conditions that I have seen posted -- again, numerous times. This is not directed at one person in particular. People need to *think.*
MaryL
Meghan Noecker - 12 Nov 2007 06:13 GMT >> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >conditions that I have seen posted -- again, numerous times. This is not >directed at one person in particular. People need to *think.* I think the majority of these posts are people that are just too cheap to go to the vet, and they hope we will solve their problem for free. Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money for other things.
I know what it is like to be tight with money. I have paid other bills late (and thus incurred late fees) to make sure my cats got the care they required. I have also gotten a short term loan, sold items, and borrowed money. I don't regret it. My cats and dogs are worth it to me.
Unfortunately, a lot of people don't feel the same way. They won't go to the vet if they think it can be solved by a free online question. Or they won't go to the overnight vet because it costs too much. Or worse, they won't even call the vet because they think it takes too long to look up phone numbers. Gee, if they had a regular vet, they wouldn't need to look up the phone number, and the vet wold be happy to assist a regular customer.
But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear.
MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 06:46 GMT >>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do > is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear. Unfortunately, I think you are correct. There are some occasions when I think it is a newbie who really doesn't know what to do, but that is a rarity. Like you, I went through periods when I borrowed money to take care of my cats (actually, one cat at a time). I got my first cat when I was in graduate school, and my cat needed emergency surgery. I slowly paid the bill off, and it was paid in full after about three years -- but I made arrangements for it, and it was done. And it was well worth it! He was less than a year old at that time, but he lived to be just a little less than 20 years old. He was wonderful!
MaryL
Wendy - 12 Nov 2007 16:39 GMT > Unfortunately, I think you are correct. There are some occasions when I > think it is a newbie who really doesn't know what to do, but that is a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > MaryL I suppose it's a good idea to be a little patient until the OP shows themselves to be one of the a**holes who are too cheap or stupid to have a cat. There might be people who really don't know if their cat's problem could wait until morning for the regular vet or if it's necessary to do the emergency vet trip. There are other people who might not have access to 24/7 vet care and post to see if there is something they could/should be doing until they can get the cat to the vet. Sometimes they get jumped on because we have all come to expect the jerks. Cats barf from time to time when there really isn't anything wrong. How do you know the difference between eating too quickly or trying to kutz up a hair ball and some life threatening illness?
I've fostered a couple of hundred cats and don't always know what I'm dealing with and if it really requires a vet visit. Making the call to take the cat to the emergency vet can be even trickier.
Wendy
Matthew - 12 Nov 2007 17:24 GMT >>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > MaryL Mary many points you are right. There are newbie that truly do need help or don't understand. Many and Most of us out here are experienced and very knowledgeable about cats but hey I learn something new everyday. We can never ASSUME about them; unfortunately we do sometimes and we make mistakes. All we can do is apologize and move on. The ones that start to argue are the ones that are the a@@holes.
When I did not have money. I took every spare dollar and put it away for the furballs. If they need something from the vet. I went on payment plans and many of days went to daily work daily pay jobs besides my full time job to get extra money. I made it a habit for each cat I put $50 away each month. I still do even though I don't need to but days come around and you spend almost $10,000 to make sure one of your master will become safe, healthy and free from pain. Every dollar spent was well worth it
I am not a newbie but If you remember my vet was not that experienced with diabetes food regiment. He is now thanks to you all. But it was you, Phil and a few others that got me to get Rumble on a Fancy Feast Diet. The diet got Rumble regulated and off insulin. That help was on of the greatest things anyone could have done for me out here and I will always be eternally grateful to all that helped.
I am truly annoyed at people that say I don't have the money but yet the smoke, drink, go out to eat, have broadband cable etc
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 03 Dec 2007 12:13 GMT MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > MaryL Against my doctors advice I would climb back into the ring to raise the cash if my cats needed it. Even if it meant they would have to carry me out of the ring. I am too old for it now.
 Signature Count Baldoni
William Graham - 03 Dec 2007 16:11 GMT > MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > cash if my cats needed it. Even if it meant they would have to carry me > out of the ring. I am too old for it now. With me it isn't the money. Taking a pet to the vet is just a PIA.....They don't understand that you are trying to help, and the vet wants them at some inconvenient time and then thinks that you can give them a pill easily, or do some other regular procedure easily......People doctors are the same way.....I will put off going to the doctor myself until the last possible minute, hoping that whatever it is will go away, or cure itself........
Professor - 03 Dec 2007 17:14 GMT >> MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>>> [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > possible minute, hoping that whatever it is will go away, or cure > itself........ Which is why idiots like you don't discover their cancer is too advanced by the time they go to the doctor. You are a poster child for why it is important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often.
AMUN - 03 Dec 2007 17:56 GMT >>> MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > by the time they go to the doctor. You are a poster child for why it is > important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often. Well if they are posting here, and not in a terminal cancer ward, then it sounds like they must be doing something right.
Hear of a lot of people that doctors caught the disease early, and the patient still dies. Or 30 year old cancer patients that are given 6 months to live, and die at 92 from natural causes.
Many doctors and vets just guess.
William Graham - 04 Dec 2007 00:28 GMT >>> MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > by the time they go to the doctor. You are a poster child for why it is > important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often. You mean like my brother in law? - He had some symptoms of prostate cancer. He went to the doctor, and the doctor said, "Oh don't worry about it Ed, all men your age have those kinds of troubles." - So, He waited, and the symptoms became worse, so he went back. This happened several times. Then one day, while sitting in his doctor's office, he read an article in "RN", a nurses magazine. It listed the 7 symptoms of prostate cancer. When it came time for him to go in and see the doctor, he brought the magazine with him. He said to the doctor, "Do you see these 7 symptoms of prostate cancer it lists here doc?" And the doctor said, yes? And Ed said, "well, I'VE GOT EVERY F***** ONE OF THEM!!!" He died three years later.......
This is typical of the state of the medical profession today.....They are, for the most part, still a bunch of snake oil salesmen selling their crap from the back of a wagon somewhere........The only ones who really know anything are the surgeons, who actually do something for people and animals.....
q - 04 Dec 2007 20:14 GMT >>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write : <snip>
>>>> Against my doctors advice I would climb back into the ring to raise >>>> the cash if my cats needed it. Even if it meant they would have to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> for why it is important to see doctors and veterinarians early and >> often. Lots of times the doctors make you WORSE, not better. It's a far cry from what is supposedly the standard in the Hipocracy Oath.
> You mean like my brother in law? - He had some symptoms of prostate > cancer. He went to the doctor, and the doctor said, "Oh don't worry [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > really know anything are the surgeons, who actually do something for > people and animals..... (BTW, I worked with surgeons and they too regularily fuckup)
There is ALOT of truth to this. The more I see doctors the more I realize how terrible medical services are in the USA. The focus of course, as with everything else in this Cuntry (sic) seems to be on MONEY. Have good insurance? You will probably be OVERtreated. Have little or no insurance?-their attitude is, well, 'you're going to die anyways, so why bother'. Lots of incompetence also. There is a good reason why there are so medical malpractice lawsuits-namely, because there are alot of fuckups. Ditto for the drug companies. Last antibiotic I took nearly turned my liver into jello and the doctor never even warned me about side effects from the AB. I was watching Chavez' vote in Venezuela. Too bad the people did not understand that here is a guy who sincerely wants justice for the poor working man. Not like all the greedy, power hungry corrupt politicians here. The capitalism in this Kuntry is an evil, corrupted form of capitalism of profit above all else.
Vets are worse, at least the ones in Tucson. Greedy, greedy, greedy. No ethical qualms about refusing treatment of a suffering animal due to owners inability to pay in full, IMMEDIATELY. Bunch of pigs, least the ones I've dealt with.
William Graham - 04 Dec 2007 21:37 GMT >>>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > owners inability to pay in full, IMMEDIATELY. Bunch of pigs, least the > ones I've dealt with. Well, it's an imperfect world. We all have opinions that are molded by our experiences in life. I am 72, and have a set of experiences that have shaped my opinions about various things and various professions. I realize that there are good and bad people working in all professions, but some are a lot worse than others. Institutionally, the absolute worst retailers I have ever dealt with are banks. Second worst are insurance companies, and the medical profession is a close third. If others, like the "professor" has had different experiences than I have, well, that's not unexpected. But I have to go with my own experiences. I decided a long time ago that I would not spend my life in doctor's offices worrying about my health. I intend to live until I die, and enjoy life as much as possible along the way. I just finished paying $883 for an operation for one of my cats. I don't begrudge her the money. It was money well spent for me, and the vet could have charged me a lot more. But I still find it impossible to give another of my cats two pills for his worms.....To me, that's the vets work, and they should do it instead of expecting me to do it. My job is to put up the money. I spent my life as an engineer. I didn't have other people do my engineering work, so I shouldn't have to do their work for them. All I expect is that they do their job for the money I pay them.....But, apparently, that's too much trouble. The world seems to be full of people who just want to put their hands out for a living, and have other people come along and put money in it for them. Every so often I run into someone who actually works for a living, and boy, is it refreshing!
AMUN - 04 Dec 2007 22:18 GMT >>>>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write : >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 85 lines] > often I run into someone who actually works for a living, and boy, is it > refreshing! Oh boy, do I have to agree with the part about the worm pills. After owning cats for years and for the most part allowing then outside, Tapeworms are no strangers to out house
Yet even though I know exactly what they need, and would be glad to just buy the pills over the counter and shove them down the cats throat immediately. Most vets we come across want to charge for an "examination" before they will sell you the pills.
And it usually consists of little more than them asking you if the cat seems alright, and then looking at various spots on the cat for about 40 seconds, for a $50.00 charge. Then to bring the cat back every month each time for more $$$$$$$ for shots, and boosters, stool tests, blood tests, and weigh in's, and psychiatric sessions, and,.....
HEY!!!! The cat is fine, other than the wigglies coming out of it's a.s.
We finally found a vet that will just give me the pills as needed, (usually once every 3 months) without even looking at the cat's. And only charges for the cost of the pills.
But we went though an awful lot of vets who learned how loud I could yell, before we finally found one who only cares that the cats are treated properly.
Tara Legale - 13 Nov 2007 00:31 GMT I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have asked questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for opinions, and even more so, reaching out to others who may have experienced something similar to whatever my concern or question is about. I suggest if you have no personal experience or helpful opinion, that you not reply to the OP at all. And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question.
Upscale - 13 Nov 2007 01:13 GMT "Tara Legale" <lawyershalloffame@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have asked > questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for > opinions, and even more so, reaching out to others who may have experienced > something similar to whatever my concern or question is about. You're right up to a point, but it's likely you haven't seen some of the questions asked here and asked much more frequently than you might imagine. There have been people that ask "what should I do" when their pet has been coughing up blood, is urinating blood, has a big raw area on their stomach or is screaming in pain and similar stuff. In fact, there are times when it's so obvious the animal needs to be taken to a vet that the only way to get them to do so is to go apeshit on their a.s and snap them out of their ignorance, if only for a few hours so they take the animal to a vet like they should have done a week ago.
Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet, they appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's completely obvious what they should have done a long time ago. To me, that's some form of ignorance, stupidity or a combination of both and requires only one type of reply to them. And if it makes them angry at me or someone else for saying it to them, then fine as long as they take the animal a vet as soon as humanly possible.
y - 13 Nov 2007 22:11 GMT <snip>
And some people here are such dummies they cannot see what a racket these vet practices are. It's a scam in many ways because a little reading and effort results in the SAME treatment given by the pet owner that the vet charges such exorbitant fees for, often approaching or higher than for a human physician who at least must make an effort to follow ethical canons. One example: URI/eye infection treated with antibiotics, available from many sources at much lower cost than through the vet. Cost: $23 for meds. Cost at vet? $50 for walking in the door another $75 for meds. Payment due in full immediately or ELSE!
> Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet, > they appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > me or someone else for saying it to them, then fine as long as they > take the animal a vet as soon as humanly possible. Matthew - 13 Nov 2007 22:42 GMT "y" <y@y.com>
How many times are you going to change your display name. Alone@novet.org , u.u.org just to name a few
Take your meds go back to the home get off the library's computer other people need it to do something worthwhile
u - 20 Nov 2007 23:29 GMT > "Tara Legale" <lawyershalloffame@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > a.s and snap them out of their ignorance, if only for a few hours so > they take the animal to a vet like they should have done a week ago. Your right about the above. But my OP was assuming the person is reasonably intelligent and educated as the above example, the person is neither.
> Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet, > they appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > me or someone else for saying it to them, then fine as long as they > take the animal a vet as soon as humanly possible. I sometimes post here to get further advice, but I rarely rely on the answers in this group as the primary determiner of what course of treatment I will take. I will not go to a vet except in a case of emergency where I cannot treat the problem myself. Most vets in my city that I have encountered are greedy, incompetent and uncaring or all three.
smoggy - 14 Nov 2007 18:21 GMT > I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have asked > questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the OP at all. And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should > see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question. thanks tara,you have summed up exactly what i was about to post. i wont post again.
Rhonda - 14 Nov 2007 19:49 GMT I agree with everything you said, Tara.
Staying on a newsgroup long term takes patience with each new question and each new personality. Most people asking what to do when their cats are truly in an emergency are not the regulars -- they are the ones that just pop in for advice. And they do -need- advice, even it it's "go to the vet."
I can guarantee they won't be reading this discussion.
Rhonda
> I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have asked > questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the OP at all. And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should > see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question. William Graham - 14 Nov 2007 20:26 GMT >I agree with everything you said, Tara. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> that you feel they should see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for >> asking a question. With human being problems, I have known people who spend their lives in doctors offices.....Every time they have a sniffle, they go to the doctor. there are others who would rather die.....And sooner or later, they do. The problem with animals is that they can't tell you much. You don't know whether they are really hurting bad or not. So, it takes some common sense to know whether you should take them to the vet or not. If my cat is limping, I will usually wait a couple of days, and see if the limp improves or gets worse or stays the same. but with an eye problem, I would take them to the vet right away. For one thing, they can't wash out their eyes the same as we can. so they are usually very uncomfortable, even if it would get better eventually. And, just as with us, the eyes are very important to their life style. It all involves common sense. There are a lot of things that I can do for myself that my cats can't do for themselves, so I am more likely to put up with my own problems without seeing a doctor than I would be to let my cats put up with theirs.
smoggy - 15 Nov 2007 16:32 GMT oh yes i am so you are wrong again!
> I agree with everything you said, Tara. > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > the OP at all. And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should > > see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question. u - 20 Nov 2007 23:23 GMT get yourself a free copy of copernic or firststop web search software. far superior to google. you can find anything you want on diagnosis and treatment of most animal maladies. many sources of medicine for animals on the net as well. you don't have to rely on these profit monger doctors and their inflated staffs. Nor on the often spotty and unreliable information in these groups. instead go to the hard core articles written by DVM specialists on diagnosis and treatment, -all free on the net.
> I just don't see the harm is asking a question. I know when I have > asked questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > simply say that you feel they should see a vet, and not go apeshit on > their a.s for asking a question. l - 13 Nov 2007 22:01 GMT >>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money > for other things. And I think the majority of people like you need medication to think straight.
> I know what it is like to be tight with money. I have paid other bills > late (and thus incurred late fees) to make sure my cats got the care > they required. I have also gotten a short term loan, sold items, and > borrowed money. I don't regret it. My cats and dogs are worth it to > me. Maybe if these vets did not concern themselves with having the latest technologically expensive equipment and helping more animals, less with having bloated staffs and nice buildings and more with helping animals, you would not need to go into debt to have your animals treated??
> Unfortunately, a lot of people don't feel the same way. They won't go > to the vet if they think it can be solved by a free online question. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > wouldn't need to look up the phone number, and the vet wold be happy > to assist a regular customer. 90% of animal problems can be prevented or treated by the owners IF they have IQ's in the normal range and can read and THINK for themselves. They don't need to accept these outrageous charges from charlatans who put a "Dr." in front of their names and think they are fooling anyone.
> But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do > is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear. Maybe if vets actually cared about animal welfare, we'd be inclined to use their services, but they do not and most should not even have been admitted to veterinary schools who are complicit in flooding the market with unethical "doctors".
William Graham - 13 Nov 2007 22:19 GMT > Maybe if these vets did not concern themselves with having the latest > technologically expensive equipment and helping more animals, less with > having bloated staffs and nice buildings and more with helping animals, > you would not need to go into debt to have your animals treated?? This same thing can be said for the medical profession in general....especially as practiced here in the US. It is about the most screwed-up profession I know of. I would: 1. Take away their "power of the pen", and let anyone be able to buy any medication they want. (eliminate the prescription process) After all, it's a free country....If I want to poison myself, why would you (or anyone else) care? Physicians should be advisors. Period. 2. Instead of tearing down all the federal hospitals, (as they did 15 years ago) They should have turned them into teaching hospitals, and started turning out doctors as fast as they do lawyers and engineers.....No doctor should be making more than his equal in engineers and lawyers. (The only real reason they do, is because of the prescription process mentioned above.) The AMA has congress in its pockets, and that relationship should be broken up Muy Pronto......
My wife is a nurse, and I can tell you that the medical profession in this country is royally screwed up, and you and I (and all the dogs and cats too) are paying for it.
Basically, these guys are no better than the old snake oil salesmen who rode their red and yellow wagons into town, and sole their snake oil from the platforms on the rear deck for a dime a bottle, and then rode to the next town.....Only today, because of the AMA and their superb salesmanship, they have convinced the world that they are some kind of Gods who should have the right of life and death over the rest of us.....Most of what they have and sell is still no better than the snake oil they had in 1850. Only now, you have to come to them, and they charge you $150 for letting them sell it to you for 15 minutes.......
AMUN - 14 Nov 2007 07:09 GMT >>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > admitted to veterinary schools who are complicit in flooding the market > with unethical "doctors". Careful, that's a wide brush you have there.
I'm not going to defend all vets, as there are far too many who's only concern is how fast they can fill their bank accounts. And know that a needle to put something to sleep is a quick, no brains, profit, with no "complaints" later. Or those who start running hundreds of dollars worth of tests when a 30 second examination may be all that's needed.
All you have to do is hear about one of those, and ALL vets are suspect.
Like every other trade or discipline, there are those who do it because they love it, and those who just want to make a quick buck doing the least amount possible. Or were just to stupid to be human doctors so got a smart paper to work on animals.
(Although I still think a vet has to know far more than a human doctor)
The time to choose a vet is not when your beast has a problem, but when it's perfectly healthy. If they start talking about hellfire and brimstone unless you spend $$$$$$ while "kitty" is contentedly purring,...... RUN !
But if you run to the vet everytime "kitty" coughs up a hairball, expect the even the most honest vet to start running up a bill, thinking that's the only thing that is going to make you happy.
u - 20 Nov 2007 22:35 GMT >>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money > for other things. <more drivel snipped>
Ok, member of the sheeple species. Go into debt to feed some unethical shyster businessman who claims to be a doctor, I don't care, it's your money.
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 29 Nov 2007 14:20 GMT Meghan Noecker presented the following explanation :
>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply >>> reply stating that opinion. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do > is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear. I will never set foot in the local Budget Vet again. I had my cat boogd in and stormed out after giving them a mouthful.
 Signature Count Baldoni
u - 29 Nov 2007 21:31 GMT What praytell is "boogd"??
> I will never set foot in the local Budget Vet again. I had my cat > boogd in and stormed out after giving them a mouthful. IBen Getiner - 27 Nov 2007 09:12 GMT On Nov 11, 7:58�pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> wrote:
> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same > problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read. �That [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > MaryL Yes... and all the more reason for people NOT to frequent here. Look at the frigging FOOLS that they'll be talking to! All of you disabled LOZERS in here, all on the dole. Worthless and useless with nothing constructive to do. Your lives are all wasted yet you all seem to think you can help someone else with their own. LOL...!!
IBen Getiner
Matthew - 27 Nov 2007 15:54 GMT "IBen Getiner" <Lappcatt@aol.com>
< snipped for being bullshit>
Get back on your meds would you
IBen Getiner - 28 Nov 2007 11:42 GMT > "IBen Getiner" <Lappc...@aol.com> > > < snipped for being bullshit> > > Get back on your meds would you I'm sorry, but wasn't addressing you, Matty.
IBen Getiner
u - 29 Nov 2007 21:34 GMT > On Nov 27, 10:54�am, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I'm sorry, but wasn't addressing you, Matty. This idiot is diagnosing others mental problems and he cannot even reply to the right poster. Maybe Ritalin or Adderal for you?
> IBen Getiner fred - 28 Nov 2007 18:49 GMT > On Nov 11, 7:58�pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER> > wrote:
>> These are good forums for general information and advice, but we are >> *not* > >> veterinarians. �Moreover, many of the questions relate to problems > that even If we were, we'd probably not answer post until payment had been made in full.
<snip>
>> Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)! �Call a vet > ASAP when >> you detect a problem, in the same way that you would want medical >> care for > >> yourself. Many in this group are hypocrites. They profess to be compassionate animal lovers, but really are here to drum up cash for Vet. Offices.
�You are not only causing additional pain/discomfort for
> your cat >> when you delay and wait for unknown people on a newsgroup to respond, >> but the irony is that you often cause additional expense for >> yourself. ï¿ Funny the Vets I've met lately don't seem to care if the animal is suffering, they are primarily concerned about getting their pint of blood.
> ½Many >> problems that can be easily and inexpensively remedied can quickly >> become much more serious and more expensive when treatment is >> delayed. No Vet. Treated myself. Problem solved. Cat much better. What's the problem?
>> MaryL > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > constructive to do. Your lives are all wasted yet you all seem to > think you can help someone else with their own. LOL...!! Not interested in helping a**holes like you. Only your animals who are probably smarter and I know more moral. Please learn to spell. To bad for "her" I can imagine how SHE is suffering if IBen is Getiner.
> IBen Getiner OceanView - 29 Nov 2007 15:01 GMT > . Please learn to spell. To bad > for "her" I can imagine how SHE is suffering if IBen is Getiner. Irony. Correct word usage is "too" bad.
|
|
|