Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vets need to be consulted

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 00:58 GMT
I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same
problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read.  That
is, someone will post a message to us asking, "What is the problem?"  - or
possibly - "What can I do?"

These are good forums for general information and advice, but we are *not*
veterinarians.  Moreover, many of the questions relate to problems that even
a professional could not solve without an on-site examination.  Worse, some
of the problems have either been neglected for a long time or involve issues
that clearly call for immediate medical care.

Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)!  Call a vet ASAP when
you detect a problem, in the same way that you would want medical care for
yourself.  You are not only causing additional pain/discomfort for your cat
when you delay and wait for unknown people on a newsgroup to respond, but
the irony is that you often cause additional expense for yourself.  Many
problems that can be easily and inexpensively remedied can quickly become
much more serious and more expensive when treatment is delayed.

MaryL

Photos of Duffy and Holly:      >'o'<
Duffy:  http://tinyurl.com/cslwf
Holly:  http://tinyurl.com/9t68o
Duffy and Holly together:  http://tinyurl.com/8b47e
Sherry - 12 Nov 2007 01:15 GMT
On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
wrote:
> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same
> problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read.  That
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> MaryL

Absolutely. Just as personal anecdotal evidence; *every time* I have
delayed or put
off a trip to the vet the problem only grew worse, and cost the cat
more suffering
and a higher vet bill in the long run. Like everybody else, I hate
putting them through
the trauma of the vet trip, and of course, like many others, I am on a
tight budget.
Most recent was Bosley's chin acne, usually a minor thing. If I'd
taken proper care
of him at the beginning of the outbreak, it wouldn't have turned into
a huge, swollen,
infected abscess.

Sherry
u - 20 Nov 2007 22:21 GMT
> On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> for a long time or involve issues that clearly call for immediate
>> medical care.

Of course all of the above is just conjecture on your part. And
conjecture in the direction of the "take em to the vet" kneejerk
reaction. Which job do you hold in a vet office? Or how do you profit
from that advice. It's wrong. As I pointed out MOST of the medical
problems you take an animal to the vet for can be handled at home with
some reading and medication available from various sources without a
profit-mongering vet feeding from the trough. Just successfully treated
an upper respiratory infection, saving myself big bucks and, more
importantly, I deprived some unprofessional jackass who is primarily in
the business to make money his due. Tons of medical information for
animals on the net and tons of places to get medications needed for
treatment. Don't believe these "take em to the vet" people here that
work in vet offices often.

>> Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)!  Call a vet
>> ASAP when you detect a problem,

Gee the vets here don't have compassion, why should we? and more
importantly why should we give them our money when we can do most of it
ourselves?

<more BS snipped>

>> MaryL
>>
> Absolutely. Just as personal anecdotal evidence; *every time* I have
> delayed or put
> off a trip to the vet the problem only grew worse, and cost the cat
> more suffering

yeah, cuz you're maybe not intelligent enough or cannot make enough of a
committment or are too afraid to treat your pet?
Matthew - 20 Nov 2007 22:37 GMT
"u" <u@u.com> wrote in message

Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 29 Nov 2007 14:13 GMT
Matthew presented the following explanation :
> "u" <u@u.com> wrote in message
>
> Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality

Sometimes though it does seem that they have a license to print money.

Signature

Count  Baldoni

Matthew - 29 Nov 2007 17:32 GMT
> Matthew presented the following explanation :
>> "u" <u@u.com> wrote in message
>>
>> Would you get back on your meds and come back to reality
>
> Sometimes though it does seem that they have a license to print money.

ROFLMAO  so true
William Graham - 21 Nov 2007 02:53 GMT
>> On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> yeah, cuz you're maybe not intelligent enough or cannot make enough of a
> committment or are too afraid to treat your pet?

Sometimes you need something to do while you wait for the availability of a
vet. Our cat had ear mites, or some bug or other in her right ear....It was
Friday evening. (Isn't that always the case?) So, my wife searched the
internet and found some advice that said olive oil will sometimes work as a
"home remedy" for ear mites. She put some warm olive oil in Junie's ear, and
it worked quite well until a couple of days later when we were able to take
her to the vet. I am 72 years old, and I have yet to get a toothache on
Monday morning....Every toothache I have ever had has appeared on Friday
evening.....So help me God.......If I ever get to confront my maker, that
will be my first question....Why the hell does everything happen on Friday
evening??!!
IBen Getiner - 28 Nov 2007 11:44 GMT
> On Nov 11, 6:58 pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
> wrote:

<snip>

> Sherry-

Hi, Cherry... :)

IBen Getiner
John Doe - 12 Nov 2007 02:07 GMT
When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
reply stating that opinion.

> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same
> problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read.  That
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> X-Complaints-To: abuse suddenlink.net
> Xref: prodigy.net alt.cats:225876 alt.pets.cats:48836 rec.pets.cats.anecdotes:539269 rec.pets.cats.health+behav:466847
MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 02:38 GMT
> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
> reply stating that opinion.

Of course.  And I have done that, many times -- and so have many others.
The point is, that really shouldn't be necessary, at least not in many
cases.  It should be common sense to consult a vet under the types of
conditions that I have seen posted -- again, numerous times.  This is not
directed at one person in particular.  People need to *think.*

MaryL
Meghan Noecker - 12 Nov 2007 06:13 GMT
>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>conditions that I have seen posted -- again, numerous times.  This is not
>directed at one person in particular.  People need to *think.*

I think the majority of these posts are people that are just too cheap
to go to the vet, and they hope we will solve their problem for free.
Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money
for other things.

I know what it is like to be tight with money. I have paid other bills
late (and thus incurred late fees) to make sure my cats got the care
they required. I have also gotten a short term loan, sold items, and
borrowed money. I don't regret it. My cats and dogs are worth it to
me.

Unfortunately, a lot of people don't feel the same way. They won't go
to the vet if they think it can be solved by a free online question.
Or they won't go to the overnight vet because it costs too much. Or
worse, they won't even call the vet because they think it takes too
long to look up phone numbers. Gee, if they had a regular vet, they
wouldn't need to look up the phone number, and the vet wold be happy
to assist a regular customer.

But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do
is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear.
MaryL - 12 Nov 2007 06:46 GMT
>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do
> is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear.

Unfortunately, I think you are correct.  There are some occasions when I
think it is a newbie who really doesn't know what to do, but that is a
rarity.  Like you, I went through periods when I borrowed money to take care
of my cats (actually, one cat at a time).  I got my first cat when I was in
graduate school, and my cat needed emergency surgery.  I slowly paid the
bill off, and it was paid in full after about three years -- but I made
arrangements for it, and it was done.  And it was well worth it!  He was
less than a year old at that time, but he lived to be just a little less
than 20 years old.  He was wonderful!

MaryL
Wendy - 12 Nov 2007 16:39 GMT
> Unfortunately, I think you are correct.  There are some occasions when I
> think it is a newbie who really doesn't know what to do, but that is a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> MaryL

I suppose it's a good idea to be a little patient until the OP shows
themselves to be one of the a**holes who are too cheap or stupid to have a
cat. There might be people who really don't know if their cat's problem
could wait until morning for the regular vet or if it's necessary to do the
emergency vet trip. There are other people who might not have access to 24/7
vet care and post to see if there is something they could/should be doing
until they can get the cat to the vet. Sometimes they get jumped on because
we have all come to expect the jerks. Cats barf from time to time when there
really isn't anything wrong. How do you know the difference between eating
too quickly or trying to kutz up a hair ball and some life threatening
illness?

I've fostered a couple of hundred cats and don't always know what I'm
dealing with and if it really requires a vet visit. Making the call to take
the cat to the emergency vet can be even trickier.

Wendy
Matthew - 12 Nov 2007 17:24 GMT
>>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> MaryL

Mary  many points you are right.  There are newbie that truly do need help
or don't understand.  Many and Most of us out here are experienced and very
knowledgeable about cats but hey I learn something new everyday.  We can
never ASSUME about them; unfortunately we do sometimes and we make mistakes.
All we can do is apologize and move on.  The ones that start to argue are
the ones that are the a@@holes.

When I did not have money.  I took every spare dollar and put it away for
the furballs.  If they need something from the vet.  I went on payment plans
and many of days went to daily work daily pay jobs besides my full time job
to get extra money.  I made it a habit for each cat I put $50 away each
month.   I still do even though I don't need to but days come around and you
spend almost $10,000 to make sure one of your master will become safe,
healthy  and free from pain.  Every dollar spent was well worth it

 I am not a newbie but If you remember my vet was not that experienced with
diabetes food regiment. He is now thanks to you all.  But it was you, Phil
and a few others that got me to get Rumble on a Fancy Feast Diet.  The diet
got Rumble regulated and off insulin.  That help was on of the greatest
things anyone could have done for me out here and I will always be eternally
grateful to all that helped.

I  am truly annoyed at people that say I don't have the money but yet the
smoke, drink, go out to eat, have broadband cable etc
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 03 Dec 2007 12:13 GMT
MaryL used his keyboard to write :

>>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> MaryL

Against my doctors advice I would climb back into the ring to raise the
cash if my cats needed it.  Even if it meant they would have to carry
me out of the ring.  I am too old for it now.

Signature

Count  Baldoni

William Graham - 03 Dec 2007 16:11 GMT
> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> cash if my cats needed it.  Even if it meant they would have to carry me
> out of the ring.  I am too old for it now.

With me it isn't the money. Taking a pet to the vet is just a PIA.....They
don't understand that you are trying to help, and the vet wants them at some
inconvenient time and then thinks that you can give them a pill easily, or
do some other regular procedure easily......People doctors are the same
way.....I will put off going to the doctor myself until the last possible
minute, hoping that whatever it is will go away, or cure itself........
Professor - 03 Dec 2007 17:14 GMT
>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> possible minute, hoping that whatever it is will go away, or cure
> itself........

Which is why idiots like you don't discover their cancer is too advanced by
the time they go to the doctor.  You are a poster child for why it is
important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often.
AMUN - 03 Dec 2007 17:56 GMT
>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> by the time they go to the doctor.  You are a poster child for why it is
> important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often.

Well if they are posting here, and not in a terminal cancer ward,  then it
sounds like they must be doing something right.

Hear of a lot of people that doctors caught the disease early, and the
patient still dies.
Or 30 year old cancer patients that are given 6 months to live, and die at
92 from natural causes.

Many doctors and vets just guess.
William Graham - 04 Dec 2007 00:28 GMT
>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> by the time they go to the doctor.  You are a poster child for why it is
> important to see doctors and veterinarians early and often.

You mean like my brother in law? - He had some symptoms of prostate cancer.
He went to the doctor, and the doctor said, "Oh don't worry about it Ed, all
men your age have those kinds of troubles." - So, He waited, and the
symptoms became worse, so he went back. This happened several times. Then
one day, while sitting in his doctor's office, he read an article in "RN", a
nurses magazine. It listed the 7 symptoms of prostate cancer. When it came
time for him to go in and see the doctor, he brought the magazine with him.
He said to the doctor, "Do you see these 7 symptoms of prostate cancer it
lists here doc?" And the doctor said, yes? And Ed said, "well, I'VE GOT
EVERY F***** ONE OF THEM!!!" He died three years later.......

This is typical of the state of the medical profession today.....They are,
for the most part, still a bunch of snake oil salesmen selling their crap
from the back of a wagon somewhere........The only ones who really know
anything are the surgeons, who actually do something for people and
animals.....
q - 04 Dec 2007 20:14 GMT
>>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :

<snip>

>>>> Against my doctors advice I would climb back into the ring to raise
>>>> the cash if my cats needed it.  Even if it meant they would have to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> for why it is important to see doctors and veterinarians early and
>> often.

Lots of times the doctors make you WORSE, not better. It's a far cry
from what is supposedly the standard in the Hipocracy Oath.

> You mean like my brother in law? - He had some symptoms of prostate
> cancer. He went to the doctor, and the doctor said, "Oh don't worry
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> really know anything are the surgeons, who actually do something for
> people and animals.....

(BTW, I worked with surgeons and they too regularily fuckup)

There is ALOT of truth to this. The more I see doctors the more I
realize how terrible medical services are in the USA. The focus of
course, as with everything else in this Cuntry (sic) seems to be on
MONEY. Have good insurance? You will probably be OVERtreated. Have
little or no insurance?-their attitude is, well, 'you're going to die
anyways, so why bother'. Lots of incompetence also. There is a good
reason why there are so medical malpractice lawsuits-namely, because
there are alot of fuckups. Ditto for the drug companies. Last antibiotic
I took nearly turned my liver into jello and the doctor never even
warned me about side effects from the AB. I was watching Chavez' vote in
Venezuela. Too bad the people did not understand that here is a guy who
sincerely wants justice for the poor working man. Not like all the
greedy, power hungry corrupt politicians here. The capitalism in this
Kuntry is an evil, corrupted form of capitalism of profit above all
else.

Vets are worse, at least the ones in Tucson. Greedy, greedy, greedy.
No ethical qualms about refusing treatment of a suffering animal due to
owners inability to pay in full, IMMEDIATELY. Bunch of pigs, least the
ones I've dealt with.
William Graham - 04 Dec 2007 21:37 GMT
>>>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> owners inability to pay in full, IMMEDIATELY. Bunch of pigs, least the
> ones I've dealt with.

Well, it's an imperfect world. We all have opinions that are molded by our
experiences in life. I am 72, and have a set of experiences that have shaped
my opinions about various things and various professions. I realize that
there are good and bad people working in all professions, but some are a lot
worse than others. Institutionally, the absolute worst retailers I have ever
dealt with are banks. Second worst are insurance companies, and the medical
profession is a close third. If others, like the "professor" has had
different experiences than I have, well, that's not unexpected. But I have
to go with my own experiences. I decided a long time ago that I would not
spend my life in doctor's offices worrying about my health. I intend to live
until I die, and enjoy life as much as possible along the way. I just
finished paying $883 for an operation for one of my cats. I don't begrudge
her the money. It was money well spent for me, and the vet could have
charged me a lot more. But I still find it impossible to give another of my
cats two pills for his worms.....To me, that's the vets work, and they
should do it instead of expecting me to do it. My job is to put up the
money. I spent my life as an engineer. I didn't have other people do my
engineering work, so I shouldn't have to do their work for them. All I
expect is that they do their job for the money I pay them.....But,
apparently, that's too much trouble. The world seems to be full of people
who just want to put their hands out for a living, and have other people
come along and put money in it for them. Every so often I run into someone
who actually works for a living, and boy, is it refreshing!
AMUN - 04 Dec 2007 22:18 GMT
>>>>>> MaryL used his keyboard to write :
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
> often I run into someone who actually works for a living, and boy, is it
> refreshing!

Oh boy, do I have to agree with the part about the worm pills.
After owning cats for years and for the most part allowing then outside,
Tapeworms are no strangers to out house

Yet even though I know exactly what they need, and would be glad to just buy
the pills over the counter and shove them down the cats throat immediately.
Most vets we come across want to charge for an "examination" before they
will sell you the pills.

And it usually consists of little more than them asking you if the cat seems
alright, and then looking at various spots on the cat for about 40 seconds,
for a $50.00 charge.
Then to bring the cat back every month each time for more $$$$$$$  for
shots, and boosters, stool tests, blood tests,  and weigh in's,  and
psychiatric sessions, and,.....

HEY!!!!  The cat is fine, other than the wigglies coming out of it's a.s.

We finally found a vet that will just give me the pills as needed, (usually
once every 3 months) without even looking at the cat's.
And only charges for the cost of the pills.

But we went though an awful lot of vets who learned how loud I could yell,
before we finally found one who only cares that the cats are treated
properly.
Tara Legale - 13 Nov 2007 00:31 GMT
I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have asked
questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for
opinions, and even more so, reaching out to others who may have experienced
something similar to whatever my concern or question is about.  I suggest if
you have no personal experience or helpful opinion, that you not reply to
the OP at all.  And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should
see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question.
Upscale - 13 Nov 2007 01:13 GMT
"Tara Legale" <lawyershalloffame@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have asked
> questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for
> opinions, and even more so, reaching out to others who may have experienced
> something similar to whatever my concern or question is about.

You're right up to a point, but it's likely you haven't seen some of the
questions asked here and asked much more frequently than you might imagine.
There have been people that ask "what should I do" when their pet has been
coughing up blood, is urinating blood, has a big raw area on their stomach
or is screaming in pain and similar stuff. In fact, there are times when
it's so obvious the animal needs to be taken to a vet that the only way to
get them to do so is to go apeshit on their a.s and snap them out of their
ignorance, if only for a few hours so they take the animal to a vet like
they should have done a week ago.

Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet, they
appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's completely
obvious what they should have done a long time ago. To me, that's some form
of ignorance, stupidity or a combination of both and requires only one type
of reply to them. And if it makes them angry at me or someone else for
saying it to them, then fine as long as they take the animal a vet as soon
as humanly possible.
y - 13 Nov 2007 22:11 GMT
<snip>

And some people here are such dummies they cannot see what a racket
these vet practices are. It's a scam in many ways because a little
reading and effort results in the SAME treatment given by the pet owner
that the vet charges such exorbitant fees for, often approaching or
higher than for a human physician who at least must make an effort to
follow ethical canons. One example: URI/eye infection treated with
antibiotics, available from many sources at much lower cost than through
the vet. Cost: $23 for meds. Cost at vet? $50 for walking in the door
another $75 for meds. Payment due in full immediately or ELSE!

> Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet,
> they appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> me or someone else for saying it to them, then fine as long as they
> take the animal a vet as soon as humanly possible.
Matthew - 13 Nov 2007 22:42 GMT
"y" <y@y.com>

How many times are you going to change your display name.  Alone@novet.org ,
u.u.org  just to name a few

Take your meds go back to the home get off the library's computer other
people need it to do something worthwhile
u - 20 Nov 2007 23:29 GMT
> "Tara Legale" <lawyershalloffame@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> a.s and snap them out of their ignorance, if only for a few hours so
> they take the animal to a vet like they should have done a week ago.

Your right about the above. But my OP was assuming the person is
reasonably intelligent and educated as the above example, the person is
neither.

> Some people truly are too self absorbed to responsibly own a pet. Yet,
> they appear here on regular basis asking "what should I do" when it's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> me or someone else for saying it to them, then fine as long as they
> take the animal a vet as soon as humanly possible.

I sometimes post here to get further advice, but I rarely rely on the
answers in this group as the primary determiner of what course of
treatment I will take. I will not go to a vet except in a case of
emergency where I cannot treat the problem myself. Most vets in my city
that I have encountered are greedy, incompetent and uncaring or all
three.
smoggy - 14 Nov 2007 18:21 GMT
> I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have asked
> questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the OP at all.  And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should
> see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question.

thanks tara,you have summed up exactly what i was about to post. i
wont post again.
Rhonda - 14 Nov 2007 19:49 GMT
I agree with everything you said, Tara.

Staying on a newsgroup long term takes patience with each new question
and each new personality. Most people asking what to do when their cats
are truly in an emergency are not the regulars -- they are the ones that
just pop in for advice. And they do -need- advice, even it it's "go to
the vet."

I can guarantee they won't be reading this discussion.

Rhonda

> I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have asked
> questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply looking for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the OP at all.  And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should
> see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question.
William Graham - 14 Nov 2007 20:26 GMT
>I agree with everything you said, Tara.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> that you feel they should see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for
>> asking a question.

With human being problems, I have known people who spend their lives in
doctors offices.....Every time they have a sniffle, they go to the doctor.
there are others who would rather die.....And sooner or later, they do.
   The problem with animals is that they can't tell you much. You don't
know whether they are really hurting bad or not. So, it takes some common
sense to know whether you should take them to the vet or not. If my cat is
limping, I will usually wait a couple of days, and see if the limp improves
or gets worse or stays the same. but with an eye problem, I would take them
to the vet right away. For one thing, they can't wash out their eyes the
same as we can. so they are usually very uncomfortable, even if it would get
better eventually. And, just as with us, the eyes are very important to
their life style.
   It all involves common sense. There are a lot of things that I can do
for myself that my cats can't do for themselves, so I am more likely to put
up with my own problems without seeing a doctor than I would be to let my
cats put up with theirs.
smoggy - 15 Nov 2007 16:32 GMT
oh yes i am so you are wrong again!

> I agree with everything you said, Tara.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > the OP at all.  And it is possible to simply say that you feel they should
> > see a vet, and not go apeshit on their a.s for asking a question.
u - 20 Nov 2007 23:23 GMT
get yourself a free copy of copernic or firststop web search software.
far superior to google. you can find anything you want on diagnosis and
treatment of most animal maladies. many sources of medicine for animals
on the net as well. you don't have to rely on these profit monger
doctors and their inflated staffs. Nor on the often spotty and
unreliable information in these groups. instead go to the hard core
articles written by DVM specialists on diagnosis and treatment, -all
free on the net.

> I just don't see the harm is asking a question.  I know when I have
> asked questions I am not looking for diehard vet advise, I am simply
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> simply say that you feel they should see a vet, and not go apeshit on
> their a.s for asking a question.
l - 13 Nov 2007 22:01 GMT
>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money
> for other things.

And I think the majority of people like you need medication to think
straight.

> I know what it is like to be tight with money. I have paid other bills
> late (and thus incurred late fees) to make sure my cats got the care
> they required. I have also gotten a short term loan, sold items, and
> borrowed money. I don't regret it. My cats and dogs are worth it to
> me.

Maybe if these vets did not concern themselves with having the latest
technologically expensive equipment and helping more animals, less with
having bloated staffs and nice buildings and more with helping animals,
you would not need to go into debt to have your animals treated??

> Unfortunately, a lot of people don't feel the same way. They won't go
> to the vet if they think it can be solved by a free online question.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wouldn't need to look up the phone number, and the vet wold be happy
> to assist a regular customer.

90% of animal problems can be prevented or treated by the owners IF they
have IQ's in the normal range and can read and THINK for themselves.
They don't need to accept these outrageous charges from charlatans who
put a "Dr." in front of their names and think they are fooling anyone.

> But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do
> is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear.

Maybe if vets actually cared about animal welfare, we'd be inclined to
use their services, but they do not and most should not even have been
admitted to veterinary schools who are complicit in  flooding the market
with unethical "doctors".
William Graham - 13 Nov 2007 22:19 GMT
> Maybe if these vets did not concern themselves with having the latest
> technologically expensive equipment and helping more animals, less with
> having bloated staffs and nice buildings and more with helping animals,
> you would not need to go into debt to have your animals treated??

This same thing can be said for the medical profession in
general....especially as practiced here in the US. It is about the most
screwed-up profession I know of. I would:
1.    Take away their "power of the pen", and let anyone be able to buy any
medication they want. (eliminate the prescription process) After all, it's a
free country....If I want to poison myself, why would you (or anyone else)
care? Physicians should be advisors. Period.
2.    Instead of tearing down all the federal hospitals, (as they did 15
years ago) They should have turned them into teaching hospitals, and started
turning out doctors as fast as they do lawyers and engineers.....No doctor
should be making more than his equal in engineers and lawyers. (The only
real reason they do, is because of the prescription process mentioned
above.) The AMA has congress in its pockets, and that relationship should be
broken up Muy Pronto......

My wife is a nurse, and I can tell you that the medical profession in this
country is royally screwed up, and you and I (and all the dogs and cats too)
are paying for it.

Basically, these guys are no better than the old snake oil salesmen who rode
their red and yellow wagons into town, and sole their snake oil from the
platforms on the rear deck for a dime a bottle, and then rode to the next
town.....Only today, because of the AMA and their superb salesmanship, they
have convinced the world that they are some kind of Gods who should have the
right of life and death over the rest of us.....Most of what they have and
sell is still no better than the snake oil they had in 1850. Only now, you
have to come to them, and they charge you $150 for letting them sell it to
you for 15 minutes.......
AMUN - 14 Nov 2007 07:09 GMT
>>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> admitted to veterinary schools who are complicit in  flooding the market
> with unethical "doctors".

Careful, that's a wide brush you have there.

I'm not going to defend all vets, as there are far too many who's only
concern is how fast they can fill their bank accounts.
And know that a needle to put something to sleep is a quick, no brains,
profit, with no "complaints" later.
Or those who start running hundreds of dollars worth of tests when a 30
second examination may be all that's needed.

All you have to do is hear about one of those, and ALL vets are suspect.

Like every other trade or discipline, there are those who do it because they
love it, and those who just want to make a quick buck doing the least amount
possible. Or were just to stupid to be human doctors so got a smart paper to
work on animals.

(Although I still think a vet has to know far more than a human doctor)

The time to choose a vet is not when your beast has a problem, but when it's
perfectly healthy.
If they start talking about hellfire and brimstone unless you spend $$$$$$
while "kitty" is contentedly purring,...... RUN !

But if you run to the vet everytime "kitty" coughs up a hairball, expect the
even the most honest vet to start running up a bill, thinking that's the
only thing that is going to make you happy.
u - 20 Nov 2007 22:35 GMT
>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Many of them claim to not have enough money to go, but they have money
> for other things.

<more drivel snipped>

Ok, member of the sheeple species. Go into debt to feed some unethical
shyster businessman who claims to be a doctor, I don't care, it's your
money.
Baldoni <baldoniXXV - 29 Nov 2007 14:20 GMT
Meghan Noecker presented the following explanation :

>>> When you think a veterinarian needs to be consulted, you can simply
>>> reply stating that opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> But hey, according to them, we are the true bad guys because all we do
> is suggest they go to the vet, the one thing they don't want to hear.

I will never set foot in the local Budget Vet again.  I had my cat
boogd in and stormed out after giving them a mouthful.

Signature

Count  Baldoni

u - 29 Nov 2007 21:31 GMT
What praytell is "boogd"??

> I will never set foot in the local Budget Vet again.  I had my cat
> boogd in and stormed out after giving them a mouthful.
IBen Getiner - 27 Nov 2007 09:12 GMT
On Nov 11, 7:58�pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
wrote:
> I seldom crosspost, but I am doing so this time because I have seen the same
> problem over-and-over-again on each of the "cats" newsgroups I read. �That
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> MaryL

Yes... and all the more reason for people NOT to frequent here. Look
at the frigging FOOLS that they'll be talking to!  All of you disabled
LOZERS in here, all on the dole. Worthless and useless with nothing
constructive to do. Your lives are all wasted yet you all seem to
think you can help someone else with their own. LOL...!!

IBen Getiner
Matthew - 27 Nov 2007 15:54 GMT
"IBen Getiner" <Lappcatt@aol.com>

< snipped for being bullshit>

Get back on your meds would you
IBen Getiner - 28 Nov 2007 11:42 GMT
> "IBen Getiner" <Lappc...@aol.com>
>
> < snipped for being bullshit>
>
> Get back on your meds would you

I'm sorry, but wasn't addressing you, Matty.

IBen Getiner
u - 29 Nov 2007 21:34 GMT
> On Nov 27, 10:54�am, "Matthew" <Iamacatsl...@proudtoserve.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I'm sorry, but wasn't addressing you, Matty.

This idiot is diagnosing others mental problems and he cannot even reply
to the right poster. Maybe Ritalin or Adderal for you?

> IBen Getiner
fred - 28 Nov 2007 18:49 GMT
> On Nov 11, 7:58�pm, "MaryL" <stanco...@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER>
> wrote:

>> These are good forums for general information and advice, but we are
>> *not*
>
>> veterinarians. �Moreover, many of the questions relate to problems
>  that even

If we were, we'd probably not answer post until payment had been made in
full.

<snip>

>> Please, folks, use your brains (and your compassion)! �Call a vet
> ASAP when
>> you detect a problem, in the same way that you would want medical
>> care for
>
>> yourself.

Many in this group are hypocrites. They profess to be compassionate
animal lovers, but really are here to drum up cash for Vet. Offices.

�You are not only causing additional pain/discomfort for
>  your cat
>> when you delay and wait for unknown people on a newsgroup to respond,
>> but the irony is that you often cause additional expense for
>> yourself. ï¿

Funny the Vets I've met lately don't seem to care if the animal is
suffering, they are primarily concerned about getting their pint of
blood.

> ½Many
>> problems that can be easily and inexpensively remedied can quickly
>> become much more serious and more expensive when treatment is
>> delayed.

No Vet. Treated myself. Problem solved. Cat much better. What's the
problem?

>> MaryL
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> constructive to do. Your lives are all wasted yet you all seem to
> think you can help someone else with their own. LOL...!!

Not interested in helping a**holes like you. Only your animals who are
probably smarter and I know more moral. Please learn to spell. To bad
for "her" I can imagine how SHE is suffering if IBen is Getiner.

> IBen Getiner
OceanView - 29 Nov 2007 15:01 GMT
> . Please learn to spell. To bad
> for "her" I can imagine how SHE is suffering if IBen is Getiner.

Irony.  Correct word usage is "too" bad.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.