Link to Gettysburg photos showing the Gettysburg battlefield before
superintendent John Latschar's ego ran amok and ruined it.
http://users.snip.net/~hart/
We loved Gettysburg: married there, took dozens of week-long trips, spent
many thousands of dollars there, and even considered moving there. But those
days are over thanks to park superintendent John Latschar. He's ruining the
Gettysburg battlefield. He calls it restoration. Desecration is more
descriptive. If we spent another dime we'd be supporting the destruction. We
refuse.
Trees are being ripped out wholesale. The deer have been slaughtered.
Visiting on a November evening is an experience everyone should be able to
enjoy, but he shortened the decades-old operating hours so you'll be
ticketed and labeled criminals. He threw up so many one-way signs that
traffic in town has become a tourist's nightmare. His nonsense goes on and
on.
He likes saying, "The time for comment was during the planning, not now."
Well, Bozo, the public DID and continues to comment, but you ignore them.
Tens of 1000s have voiced their concern, but you act as though the
Gettysburg battlefield is your own private domain to use and abuse as you
please. It belongs to the taxpayers, not an arrogant, government-appointed
bureaucratic freeloader.
Gettysburg battlefield ghost hunters have been turned away in droves because
he equates them with drug users and drinkers. What a moron. Not only is the
town losing a fortune toward the local economy, the park is losing thousands
of watchful eyes from some of the most respectful visitors. Those with evil
intent will always gain access at night as was proven by recent vandalism.
Closing the park merely keeps honest folks out. John Latschar has, in
effect, given vandals free rein.
Attendance is lagging. He blames everything except his own bumbling. He
constantly moans about never having enough money to fix rotting cannons,
monuments and buildings, yet continues wasting funds on mindnumbingly
senseless projects that divide the townspeople and drives others away. It's
typical government ineptness.
Looks like John Latschar sits around dreaming up new ways to piss people
off. If he's not shooting the wildlife, cutting down 100s of acres of trees,
changing the hours or screwing up traffic flow, he'll devise some other
dumbass plan. Chances are he'll eventually move on to another location
leaving his mess and debts behind for someone else. It wouldn't be the first
time.
What's worse than allowing John Latschar to inflict so much damage to the
Gettysburg battlefield? Most of you sit idly by and let it happen without so
much as a whimper. Talk is cheap, but a Gettysburg boycott speaks volumes.
We're doing our part. Good bye Gettysburg. You were our favorite place on
Earth until John Latschar raped you. Now you're just a memory. What a pity
and disgrace.
Cassie and Tom
http://users.snip.net/~hart/
Barnabas Collins - 08 Aug 2006 20:43 GMT
>Link to Gettysburg photos showing the Gettysburg battlefield before
>superintendent John Latschar's ego ran amok and ruined it.
>http://users.snip.net/~hart/
As someone who has relatives who go to Gettysburg each year to
re-enact the battles what are you referring to?
Got details?
BTW, I would point out are you sure it was them? I would mention that
our state has a monument at Gettysburg that has been there for many
years, apparently some kids got drunk one night and decided they had
to have the sword attached to the memorial. So they did.
Matthew - 08 Aug 2006 20:51 GMT
Just spam for his website
wester@laway.net - 08 Aug 2006 22:11 GMT
>>Link to Gettysburg photos showing the Gettysburg battlefield before
>>superintendent John Latschar's ego ran amok and ruined it.
>>http://users.snip.net/~hart/
This has to do with cats how exactly?
oldhickory - 09 Aug 2006 07:14 GMT
Cats love spam

Signature
ie
ride fast, take chances.
>>>Link to Gettysburg photos showing the Gettysburg battlefield before
>>>superintendent John Latschar's ego ran amok and ruined it.
>>>http://users.snip.net/~hart/
>
> This has to do with cats how exactly?
wester@laway.net - 09 Aug 2006 23:31 GMT
>Cats love spam
<snerk> I've never tried mine with it. I betcha they wouldn't touch it
(but the dog'll eat anything).
The Polish-Kraut - 10 Aug 2006 13:22 GMT
>>Cats love spam
>
><snerk> I've never tried mine with it. I betcha they wouldn't touch it
>(but the dog'll eat anything).
I have 4 and they will smell it, or possibly lick it, then turn and
walk away.
My furbabies
http://members.aol.com/larrystark/
Barnabas Collins - 10 Aug 2006 17:19 GMT
>>Cats love spam
>
><snerk> I've never tried mine with it. I betcha they wouldn't touch it
>(but the dog'll eat anything).
Depends on the cat. I've had cats that will eat anything that won't
eat it.
Barnabas Collins - 08 Aug 2006 20:57 GMT
>Trees are being ripped out wholesale. The deer have been slaughtered.
>Visiting on a November evening is an experience everyone should be able to
>enjoy, but he shortened the decades-old operating hours so you'll be
>ticketed and labeled criminals. He threw up so many one-way signs that
>traffic in town has become a tourist's nightmare. His nonsense goes on and
>on.
Any idea why? Maybe the trees had to be ripped out due to dutch elm
disease?
Maybe the operating hours were cut due to security?
(Both crime in the area and post 9/11 concerns?)
>Gettysburg battlefield ghost hunters have been turned away in droves because
>he equates them with drug users and drinkers. What a moron. Not only is the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Closing the park merely keeps honest folks out. John Latschar has, in
>effect, given vandals free rein.
What are you defining as a ghost hunter?
>Attendance is lagging. He blames everything except his own bumbling. He
>constantly moans about never having enough money to fix rotting cannons,
>monuments and buildings, yet continues wasting funds on mindnumbingly
>senseless projects that divide the townspeople and drives others away. It's
>typical government ineptness.
Could attendance be lagging due to the price of gas?
The recent floods in Pennsylvania?
Maybe the funding is far short of what is needed to
fix the place right?
>What's worse than allowing John Latschar to inflict so much damage to the
>Gettysburg battlefield? Most of you sit idly by and let it happen without so
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Cassie and Tom
>http://users.snip.net/~hart/
Maybe a boycott of Gettysburg is the wrong approach. By boycotting
Gettysburg aren't you punishing the many who faught and died there?
Is it really fair to punish those who valiantly defended us at
Gettysburg when your beef is with the person running the place?
Also maybe the people you should blame is congress?