>My mom's cat licks photographs.
I'd be leary about whether that is good (safe).
I'm not sure how safe those chemicals on the photograph are
(even if dry.)
> >My mom's cat licks photographs.
> I'd be leary about whether that is good (safe).
>
> I'm not sure how safe those chemicals on the photograph are
> (even if dry.)
Yeah, ours does that too. It doesnt improve the photographs either.
Ours also likes polyester -- sheer curtains and blinds.
ALBERT C. GOOD JR. - 04 Jun 2006 00:00 GMT
In processing photographs, the processing chemicals are usually washed out
of the picture. Modern printing materials that the photo image is printed
onto, are such that it is easy to eliminate almost all of these chemicals.
Further, the image containing emulsion is hardened and becomes all but
insoluble. Polaroid and computer printed pictures are a different matter.
How ever any picture that is being displayed for any period of time, should
be coated with a anti-ultraviolet lacquer to minimize fading. This would
also resist the cats saliva and leaching of any latent chemicals left from
processing.
Cheers
> > >My mom's cat licks photographs.
> > I'd be leary about whether that is good (safe).
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ours also likes polyester -- sheer curtains and blinds.