Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Please Heelp!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AnimalBehaviorForensicSciencesResearchLaboratory@HushMail.Com - 03 Dec 2005 16:21 GMT
HOWEDY kibo fruitcakes,

Seems your pals over at rec.pets.dogs.behavior need some backup..
PLEASE HEELP!

From: "Deltones" <vibrov...@hotmail.com>
Date: 2 Dec 2005 10:55:41 -0800
Subject: Re: In defense of Jerry Howe's methods

Mary Healey wrote:
> I'm still asking for 5 original posts from people here at least 5 years to
> support your initial contention.  You're 0 for 2, so far.

That's 2 in 2 as far as I'm concerned but hey, if you insist. I'm
really curious to see what will be the justification this time. So far
we have:

Limited choking? Hey, it's limited, As Neo would say: Woah, there is no

choke.

Dogs pumped full of prozac? Hey, they're trippin man. Remember
Woodstock. Euh.... Woodwhat?

E-Collar? I'm sure some of you will come up with: But my dog look so
pretty with an electrified perm. Swoooon.

So on with the fun.  Taken from the "Collars" thread, started by Perry
Templeton June 20 2005

Denis

----------
On 26 Jun 2005 10:52:42 -0700, lucyaa...@claque.net, wrote:

>What does the "choke" in the "choke chain" stand for, then?
>Lucy

one reason I call them slip collars.  Their is a correction involved,
and while it causes momentary discomfort, does not choke the dog.
OTOH, it is CAPABLE fo being used to do that, should a situation
warrant it.
--
Janet B
----------

And here's another one from the same author, taken from the same
thread.

----------
167. Janet B
 Jun 21, 12:03 pm   show options
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:40:11 +0100, "Alison"

<Ali...@XYZallofus2.fsnet.co.uk>, wrote:
>  I'm just wondering why you had to use choke chains to train"your

>dogs especially as they are so small.

Oh geez - let's see - how many JRTs act like alligators at the end of
a leash?  I personally prefer prong collars.

----------

Let's go for the hat trick with the same author, taken from the same
thread:

----------
141. Janet B
Jun 27, 10:01 pm   show options

I don't use choke chains.  Not quite true - I use a jeweler's hex link
on Franklin at times - it's puuuuuurty.    I know the "sound" thing
and all, and when training a dog in a non-group setting, that sound
may be a factor, but I think it fails in the context of a group class.

So, I prefer the better fitting nylon slip collars, and very often,
pinch collars (small link unless it's a freaky dog, then they need
the  milder medium link).

But I use e-collars too.  With one of my dogs and with some clients.
For circumstances where a physical collar and leash is not the right
answer.  I'm sure Lucy has no clue what THAT means!
--
Janet B
----------

Subject: Re: In defense of Jerry Howe's methods

HOWEDY Deltones,

Deltones wrote:
> Rocky wrote:
> > "Deltones" <vibrov...@hotmail.com> said in
> > rec.pets.dogs.behavior:

> > > After your defense of "Limited" choking, what would be the
> > > point? Where I come from, choking is choking. It's never
> > > limited.

Not so in PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING, Deltones.

> > So, you can't point out abuse where none occurs.  Thank you for
> > your contribution.

> > --Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

Looks like you've pushed the mental cases over the edge again...

> Well, I think you carefully avoided quoting the last part of my post.
> You know the one about a bunch of little Colonel Parker doing Elvis's
> out of their dogs? Oh right, limited choking is not abuse, and pumping
> dogs full of drugs to make them behave ain't either in your world huh?

> For the benefit of our gentle readers, here's the part you forgot to
> quote:

> ----------
> Oh, what the hell. Check out a thread started around Nov 23 called
> "Help with a Nuerotic Hound..." where I wonder if you guys are talking
> about dogs or Woody Allen's pharmacy. I'll stick with praises and noise
>  distraction to train my dog, thank you.
> ----------

HOWEDY janet,

Looks like you and your pals have gone totally INSANE again:

Janet B wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:44:14 -0500, Janet B
> <j...@bestfriendsdogobedience.com>, clicked their heels and said:

> >Since you quoted me repeatedly, where does it say I beat dogs, choke
> >dogs, scream at dogs, etc?  Thanks for your clarification.

> responding to my own post, I had to go back and look at the original
> post, to remind myself what "we" are all accused of doing:

> "screaming, choking, shocking, pinching,
> beating the living crap out of your dogs"

> Scream?  no
> Choke? no
> Shock?  e-collars are a lot more sophisticated than that
> Pinch? if you want to classify a momentary discomfort by a prong
> collar, go ahead, but unless you have first hand experience with one,
> your opinion means nothing
> Beat the living crap out of?  hardly - no hitting exists

"Loop the lead (it's basically a GIANT nylon or leather
choke collar) over his snarly little head, and give him a
stern correction"
                       --Janet Boss

"Janet Boss offered a pat on the back, commenting that
ultimately it wasn't Kate's decision.  Whose was it? I asked.
Why, it was Teena's, averred Janet.

Janet was in an exculpatory frame of mind because she
contributed to this travesty herself, by advising Kate to
repeat the aggression trigger (grooming) on a daily basis.

It's all in the archives.

Now these two are spouting off about what kind of e-collars
they like to use on their dogs.  Well, I've got an AC Delco
model that would be just right for Janet or Kate.  BZZZZzzt!
I'd have to find it though, and I can't remember if I left
it in my underground bunker or the crawlspace under my
house," Charlie.

"J1Boss" <j1b...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:20040324071828.07753.00000001@mb-m18.aol.com...

> He was next to me and I could see his neck
> muscles pulsing.  He didn't even blink an eye.
> Janet Boss
"sionnach" <rhyfe...@msn.com> wrote in message

news:c3qi15$2biuoh$1@ID-45033.news.uni-berlin.de...

> "J1Boss" <j1b...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20040323173916.10096.00001938@mb-m17.aol.com...
> > > I can't imagine needing anything higher
> > > than a 5 with it, even with an insensitive
> > > dog like a Lab.

An INSENSITIVE DOG???

> > I can't remember what model of Innotek I have, but
> > I had a pointer ignore a neck-muscle-pulsing 9.

captain arthur haggerty SEZ: "A CHIN CHUCK" Makes A
ResoundingSound Distraction: "When You Chuck The Dog
The Sound Will Travel Up The Mandible To The Ears And
Give A Popping Sound To The Dog."

"Many People Have Problems Getting The Pinch
Right, Either They Do Not Pinch Enough, Or They
Have A Very Stoic Dog. Some Dogs Will Collapse
Into A Heap. About The Ear Pinch: You Must Keep
The Pressure Up," sindy "don't let the dog SCREAM"
mooreon, author of HOWER FAQ's pages on k9 web.

"Reliable Punishment Cycles, Different Thresholds To Pain And
Punishment,
High Tolerance For Correction, Escalation Of Correction To A Level
Where The
Dog Yelps When You Punish Him, Thus Making The Experience One Which
The Dog Will Want To Avoid In The Future," grant teeboon RAAF.

"Warning: Sometimes The Corrections Will Seem
Quite Harsh And  Cause You To Cringe. This Is A
Normal Reaction The First Few  Times It Happens,
But You'll Get Over It."mike duforth, author:
"Courteous Canine."

THAT'S sumpthin to be PR-HOWED abHOWET.

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

sinofabitch writes:
> >> What I have said- repeatedly - is that he took
> >> posts from two different people,

Of curse THAT'S a lie.

> >> took pieces of them out of context,

Of curse. QUOTED. You wanna see it in context?

> >> cobbled them together,

No. There was WON DIRECT QUOTE.

> >> then added his own words:

"Neatly," and "Smartly."

> >> and a fake signature.

"sinofabitch" instead of sionnach.

> >> Which is exactly what he did.

INDEEDY. That's HOWE COME you deny it.

> >> The actual quote is misleading

That so?

> >> when taken out of context,

We'd been talkin abHOWET beatin the dog with a shoe...

> >> and Jerry's faked "quote"

The WON sinofabitch totally DENIES.

> >> is downright meaningless.

Only if you're a MENTAL CASE.

> > Here's Jerry's version

> > "I Dropped The Leash, Threw My
> > Right Arm Over The Lab's Shoulder,
> > Grabbed Her Opposite Foot With My
> > Left Hand, Rolled Her On Her Side,
> > Leaned On Her, Smartly Growled Into
> > Her Throat And Said "GRRRR!" And
> > Neatly Nipped Her Ear," sinofabitch.

> > Here's yours;

> > "I dropped the leash, threw my
> > right arm over the Lab's shoulder,
> > grabbed her opposite foot with my
> > left hand, rolled her on her side,
> > leaned on her, said "GRRRR!" and
> > nipped her ear.
> > --Sara Sionnach

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

See?

"Granted That The Dog Who Fears Retribution
Will Adore His Owner," lying "I LOVE KOEHLER"
lynn.

 lyinglynn writes to a new foster care giver:
 For barking in the crate - leave the leash on and
 pass it through the crate door.  Attach a line to it.
 When he barks, use the line for a correction.

- if necessary, go to a citronella bark collar.

 Lynn K.

>           "Training is not confrontation"
>                                Lynn K.
> <except when it is>
>     "So what?  Whoever said that it's right to
>      always not confront?  We sure can try, but
>      a dog who knows a command and growls when
>      given it is certainly being confrontational".
>      You can't simply walk away and pretend it
>      didn't happen or leave it for later work in
>      every situation."
>                               Lynn K.
> --------------------------------------

"I used to work the Kill Room as a volunteer in
one shelter.)  But their ability to set their own
schedules and duties causes a great deal of
scheduling overhead.

And it takes effort and thought to ensure that
volunteers get the meaningful experience that
they work for.

Someone has to be responsible for that
Volunteer Program, and it is best done
by a non-volunteer."

Lynn K.
---------------------------------

Paxil Princess psychoclown wrote:

"Nope. That "beating dogs with sticks"
things is something you twisted out of
context, because you are full of bizarro
manure."

"Get a stick 30- or 40-inches long. You can have a helper
wield the stick, or do it yourself. Tougher, less tractable
dogs may require you to progress to striking them more
sharply.

REPEAT, VARYING HOW HARD YOU HIT THE DOG.

Now you are ready to progress to what most people think of
as force-fetching: the ear pinch.

Make the dog's need to stop the pinching so urgent that
resisting your will fades in importance.

but will squeal, thrash around, and direct their efforts to
escaping the ear pinch even get a studded collar and pinch
the ear against that if the dog still does not open its mouth,
get out the shotshell.

Try pinching the ear between the metal casing and the
collar, even the buckle on the collar. Persist! Eventually, the
dog will give in

With your hand on the collar and ear, say, 'fetch.'

Immediately tap the dog on the hindquarters with the stick.

Repeat "fetch" and pinch the ear all the way to the dummy.
You can press the dog's ear with a shotshell instead of your
thumb; Say 'fetch' while pressing the dummy against its lips
and pinching its ear," lying frosty dahl.

"You Lying Sack Of Dung.When Have I Ever Said
Anything About Using A Prong Collar, Or Any Collar
Correction At All, To Make Dogs Friendly To House
Cats? Don't bother. The answer is never," lying "I
LOVE KOEHLER" lynn.

lying "I LOVE KOEHLER" lynn writes about kats and dogs:

"This Article Is Something We've Put Together
For SF GSD Rescue:

From: Lynn Kosmakos (lkosma...@home.com)
Subject: Re: I have a dog he has cats
Date: 1999/11/20

ginge...@my-deja.com wrote:
>  How can I get him to quit chasing the cats.

Okay - this is going to be a bit loooong  - Lynn K.

"Put a prong collar with a six-foot leash on the dog.  Don't
forget to put the muzzle on the dog.   I think a prong works
better than a choke with less chance of injury to the dog in
this situation.

Electronics can be used to create an aversion to cats, but
should be used under the direction of a trainer who knows how
to instruct the owner in their proper use.   Electronics can
take the form of shock, sonic or citronella collars.  At that
time the owner will train with electronics instead of food or
whatever other reward system was being used."

8)  Put a prong collar with a six-foot leash on the dog.
Don't forget to put the muzzle on the dog.   I think a prong
works better than a choke with less chance of injury to the
dog in this situation.   Have the dog in a sit-stay next to
you with most of the slack out of the leash and let the cat
walk through the room and up to the dog if it wishes (this is
why you have the dog muzzled).

If the dog makes an aggressive move towards the
cat, it must be corrected strongly with both your
voice and the collar.

This is important - the correction must be physically
very strong - not a nag.   (PS: not many dogs need
to be corrected at all)."

Baghdad Bob <Baghdadbob> wrote in message
<news:04591a2c5d469ef78d35c89ed4ed58f7@TeraNews>...

> >> Lynn, looks like he got you there if these
> >> quotes are true.

> >> In the posts below you take responsibility for
> >> making those calls.

> >> In your post above, you state you do not
> >> make those calls.

> >> Which one is it?

                      WORDS OF WISDOM
                from our own Lynn Kosmakos
         1200mg of lithium and 50 mg of Zoloft every day
                      For Twenty Years

        I THINK I'M QUALIFIED TO TALK ABOUT LITHIUM

 "I, too, have a bi-polar mood disorder (manic-
depression) requiring 1200mg of lithium and 50
mg of Zoloft every day.

 I, also, care about dogs and use this forum to
 learn more, while happily sharing pertinent
 information I have learned.  But if I were ever
 to post such sh*t,  I would hope that every other
 reader of this group would be rightfully outraged."

 "Community is an evolutionary thing that we
 earn the right to participate in by observing
 the easily understood rules and contributing
 to in constructive ways."

  Lynn K.

 "It wasn't that meds didn't work for her
 - she wouldn't take them. I particularly remember
 a comment she made about scarey side effects of
 Lithium.  Hardly.  After 17 years on it, I think
 I'm qualified to say that the very low risk of
 any side effect is far less frightening than the
 very real dangers of life without it."

 Lynn K.
-----------------------------------------

LYNN K. and LOIS E, and a BiLateral, BiPolar
conversation on Mental problems.  LYNN AND LOIS
Almost 50 years on mental illness medications combined

> But I think what Lois was referring to
> was the fact that Darlene actually
> stated at some point that she was
> bipolar--and, IIRC, that meds did not work
> for her--so she was prone to major-league
> ups and downs and sudden
> enthusiasms..

 "It wasn't that meds didn't work for her
 - she wouldn't take them. I particularly remember
 a comment she made about scarey side effects of
 Lithium.  Hardly.  After 17 years on it, I think
 I'm qualified to say that the very low risk of
 any side effect is far less frightening than the
 very real dangers of life without it."

 Lynn K.

LYNN K. and the UNQUIET MIND

From: Lynn Kosmakos (lkosma...@home.com)
Subject: Re: Where is Darlene?
Date: 1999/09/03

BoxHill wrote:
> I know I am totally off topic here, but have you read
>  "The Unquiet Mind"?

 Yeah.  It's interesting, but kind of
 watered down for the mass market, if
 you know what I mean.  There's really
 quite a lot of good work out there and
 decent research.  Thank God.

 Lynn K.
---------------------------------------

                              MOTHER AND CHILD REUNION
                                    "KUCKOO!! CUCKOO!!!"
                     MOTHER (LOIS E.) 22 YEARS on TRICYCLICS
                                      DAUGHTER BIPOLAR...

YOU DO THE MATH

               "What's really terrific,
           is now days you can say proudly,
             'I take anti-depressives'"

From: Gary & lois Edwards (g...@bmi.net)
Subject: Re: Where is Darlene?
Date: 1999/09/02

 BEEN ON TRICYCLICS FOR ABOUT 22 YEARS

 "I don't take lithium, but I've been on trycyclics
 for about 22 years. Been there, done that, have
 the t-shirt to prove it. What's really terrific,
 is now days you can say proudly,

 "I take anti-depressives". Back when I started
 taking them it was seen as something shameful.
 If you cut your leg off, and were lying there with
 a bleeding stump, you'd never let the word
 depressed, pass your lips, or the doc's would say,
 "You're depressed, on medication?  Well, can't have
 any pain meds.....you could become addicted."

The good old days. I actually had a Great Aunt who's
 father locked her in her room back in the twenties
 because she was simple. A shame that medication
 probably would have helped her live a normal life.

 No Denna, I was just saying with   Darlene's
 personality, she has a way of making grandiose
 plans when at the top of her manic cycle....as
 does my daughter. I wasn't saying that anyone
 with problems could be counted on to be
 irresponsible."

 Lois E.
-------------------------------------

       "BethF" <b...@NOT-SO-bad-dawgs-in-ak.com>
        wrote in message
       news:v4r8kkfr257e1a@corp.supernews.com...

> "Kyle Boatright" <kyle.boatri...@adelphia.net>

    wrote in message
    > Kyle,  FWIW, i thought it was pretty funny,
    > and i often call my little dog the turd, because
    > he is one. Some folks think its HORRRIBLE i
    > would insult my dog like that so i guess its just a
    > matter of personality.

    > Kyle, the best way to teach him to stay away is to
    > step on him once. Seriously.

"Whatever Motivates The Dog, But I Daresay Most
Of The Dogs I Have In Classes Just Aren't That
Interested In Praise."

"BethF" <d...@alaska.com> wrote in message

news:uohnj3r4a4e85e@corp.supernews.com...

Maybe that's what we should do - hold back the dobie
girl so that Izzy can put Simon in his place.

------------------------------------------------------

Here's professor of ANAL-ytic behaviorISM research
at UofWI marshall "SCRUFF SHAKE and SCREAM "NO!"
into ITS face for five seconds and lock IT in a
box for ten minutes contemplation" dermer:

"At this point, "No" does not have any behavioral function.
But, if you say "No,"pick up the puppy by its neck and
shake it a bit, and the frequency of the biting decreases
then you will have achieved too things.

First, the frequency of unwanted chewing has decreased;
and two, you have established "No" as a conditioned punisher.

How much neck pulling and shaking? Just the
minimum necessary to decrease the unwanted
biting.

******IS THAT A CONSISTENT 5 SECONDS?*******

When our dog was a puppy,  "No" came before mild
forms of punishment (I would hold my dog's mouth
closed for a few seconds.) whereas "Bad Dog" came
before stronger punishement (the kind discussed above).

"No" is usually sufficient but sometimes I use "Bad Dog"
to stop a behavior. "Bad Dog" ALWAYS works," marshall
dermer, research professor of ANAL-ytic behaviorISM at
UofWI. For MOORE animal abuse, please visit dr p.

BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!!!

That's INSANE. Ain't it.

Here's professor dermer AFTER gettin JERRYIZED:

   "We Are Lucky To Have You, And More People Should
   Come To Their Senses And Support Your Valuable Work.
   God Bless The Puppy Wizard," Professor Marshall Dermer,
   Dept Of ANAL-ytic Behavior, UofWI.

From: "Marshall Dermer" <der...@csd.uwm.edu>
To: "The Puppy Wizard"
<ThePuppyWiz...@earthlink.net>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:53 PM

Subject: God Bless The Puppy Wizard
Dear Mr. Puppy Wizard,

I have, of late, come to recognize your genius
and now must applaud your attempts to save
animals from painful training procedures.

You are indeed a hero, a man of exceptional talent­,
who tirelessly devotes his days to crafting posts ­to
alert the world to animal abuse.

We are lucky to have you, and more people should
come to their senses and support your valuable
work.

Have you thought of establishing a nonprofit
charity to fund your important work?
Have you thought about holding a press conference
so others can learn of your highly worthwhile
and significant work?

In closing, my only suggestion is that you
try to keep your messages short for most
readers may refuse to read a long message
even if it is from the wise, heroic Puppy Wizard.
I wish you well in your endeavors.

--Marshall Dermer

"Rocky" <2...@rocky-dog.com> wrote in message

news:Xns92FEEC097E4AAaustralianshepherdca@130.133.1.4...

         > Linda wrote in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:

         > > When you compare using sound and
         > > praise to solve a problem with using
         > > shock collars, hanging, and punishment
         > > how can you criticize the use of sound?

         > There's nothing more to be said, then.
         > You've made up your mind.

         > But you've impressed me by mentioning
         > that you're a professor with 30 years of
         > experience.

         > So, can you cite some examples of
         > people recommending "shock collars,
         > hanging, and punishment"?
         > --
         > --Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

BWWWAWHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

         >> I do know that hitting, hurting your dog
         >> will often make the dog either aggressive
         >> or a fear biter, neither of which we want
         >> to do.
         >
         > And neither does anyone else, Jerome.
         > No matter what Jerry Howe states.
         >
         > --Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

         > BUT, giving you the benefit of the
         > doubt, please provide a quote (an
         > original quote, not from one of Jerry
         > Howe's heavily edited diatribes) that
         > shows a regular poster promoting or
         > using an abusive form of training.
         > --Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

         > So, can you cite some examples of
         > people recommending "shock collars,
         > hanging, and punishment"?
         > --
         > --Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

        >  What's the point, but: Refer me to those posts of
        >  which you have read so many.  While you're going
        >  through them, point out those which recommend
        >  shocking, and pinching, and beating.  Thank you.
        > --
        > -Matt.  Rocky's a Dog.

BWWWWEAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
         BWWWWEAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
                     BWWWWEAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
                              BWWWWEAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
Chris McGonnell - 03 Dec 2005 18:41 GMT
On 3 Dec 2005 08:21:01 -0800, Dog Choker Howe wrote:

>HOWEDY kibo fruitcakes,

You aren't worthy of posting to r.p.d., you vicious DOG BEATER! Oh
yes, Nazi Howe, I've seen the secretly taped video of you CRUELLY
whipping a dog with your leather leash -- the video so graphic 20/20
couldn't air it when that show aired its program of Internet con men
who cheat honest people (in this case dog trainers) out of their
HARD-EARNED money and then beat the poor dogs with cruel, cruel
instruments.

HOWE'd you like it if somebody beat YOU with a baseball bat, you
DOG-ABUSING scum?

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia
Borzoi - 03 Dec 2005 19:35 GMT
> On 3 Dec 2005 08:21:01 -0800, Dog Choker Howe wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Harming humanity since 1951.
> "McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia

Really?

I hadn't heard about this before.

Can you elaborate please?

Borzoi
Chris McGonnell - 05 Dec 2005 19:34 GMT
>> On 3 Dec 2005 08:21:01 -0800, Dog Choker Howe wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Can you elaborate please?

Jerry will, count on it.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia
IHateToSayItButITOLDYOUSO@Inbox.Com - 03 Dec 2005 20:49 GMT
HOWEDY chris,

> On 3 Dec 2005 08:21:01 -0800, Dog Choker Howe wrote:
>
> > HOWEDY kibo fruitcakes,

Thank you for responding. The heelth of the WHOWEL WILD WORLD
DEPENDS on alt.religion.kibology to SAVE US from the needle.

> You aren't worthy of posting to r.p.d., you vicious DOG BEATER!

INDEEDY. You'll find the rest of the video evidence here:
http://fredhassen.neptune.com #11, fred and tim. Jerry
Howe is playin the part of fred. tim plays tim, and terri
willis plays Santos the dog bein BEATEN.

>  Oh yes, Nazi Howe, I've seen the secretly taped video of you
>  CRUELLY whipping a dog with your leather leash --

You'll also find Jerry Howe choking shocking and beating dogs on the
rest of the useless video evidence at http://fredhassen.neptune.com
and www.remotedogtraining.com

>the video so graphic 20/20 couldn't air it

SHAMEFOOL, AIN'T IT:

 Psychoclown terri willis wrote:
 Nope. That "beating dogs with sticks" things is
 something you twisted out of context, because you
 are full of bizarro manure.

Amy lyingfrosty dahl (oakhill kennels) LIES with a
straight face and says:

"I don't beat dogs, twist ears, or pinch toes. For the
benefit of anyone who is in doubt, and who chooses
not to read the article (SHE'D REALLY LIKE IT IF YOU
DON'T READ IT!), there is NO mention in it of "twisting
ears (INDEED, SHE PINCHES THEM WITH SPIKES).

I would never slap a dog (SHE TEACHES PEOPLE TO
BEAT DOGS WITH STICKS TO MOTIVATE THEM).

I would never advise anyone to slap a dog (SHE'S A
PROVEN LIAR AND DOG ABUSER, do you expect
her to ADMIT THE TRUTH???).

I do not believe there is a single circumstance, ever,
where slapping a dog is anything but destructive."

RIGHT. She PINCHES, not twists... and chin cuff
doesn't mean hit, it means chuck.  amy lyingfrosty dahl
continues:

"Get a stick 30- or 40-inches long. You can have a
helper wield the stick, or do it yourself. Tougher, less
tractable dogs may require you to progress to striking
them more sharply.

With your hand on the collar and ear, say, 'fetch.'

Immediately tap the dog on the hindquarters with the
stick. Repeat "fetch" and pinch the ear all the way to
the dummy.

Repeat, varying how hard you hit the dog,

Now you are ready to progress to what most people think of
as force-fetching: the ear pinch.

Make the dog's need to stop the pinching so urgent
that resisting your will fades in importance.

but will squeal, thrash around, and direct their
efforts to escaping the ear pinch

You can press the dog's ear with a shotshell instead
of your thumb;

even get a studded collar and pinch the ear against
that

Say "fetch" while pressing the dummy against its lips
and pinching its ear.

if the dog still does not open its mouth, get out the
shotshell.

Try pinching the ear between the metal casing and
the collar, even the buckle on the collar. Persist!
Eventually, the dog will give in"

> when that show aired its program of Internet con men
> who cheat honest people (in this case dog trainers) out
> of their HARD-EARNED money and then beat the poor
> dogs with cruel, cruel instruments.

We was just talkin abHOWET HOWE COME the POLICE SAR
dogs WOULDN'T FIND them three DEAD children in the trunk
of the car in Trenton, N.J. and WOULDN'T FIND Jessica Lundren
300' from her HOWES and WOULDN'T FIND Elizabeth Smart, ALL
with KNOWN STARTING POINTS, ALL EZ SIMPLE TRACKS for
ANY backyard bred untrained dog, ALL mishandled by POLICE
and SAR trainers using bribery shocking and choking.

> HOWE'd you like it if somebody beat YOU with a baseball bat,
> you DOG-ABUSING scum?

That's been tried. Didn't work, HOWEver.

> --
> Chris McG.
> Harming humanity since 1951.
> "McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia

Subject: Re: Lots more working dogs videos to see

HOWEDY FRAUDreck,

fredhas...@msn.com wrote:
> At this address:   http://tinyurl.com/bwdhg

We was just talkin abHOWET HOWE to use your thirty five
levels of medical grade static like stimulation in a NON
AVERSIVE manner.

> Fred Hassen's
> "No Limitations" remote dog training system
> and horses too!!!
> www.remotedogtraining.com

Date: 2004-06-14 16:25:51 PST

HOWEDY FRAUDreck,

> > Here is a clip taken at a police seminar

Was they arresting you for animal abuse
or FRAUD, FRAUDreck?

> > after I was asked to see how the dog
> > would perform without the collar on.

INDEEDY, FRAUDreck. Who's side are you on?
You SHORE came HOWET lookin like a CHUMP
in that video, eh?

You took that shock collar off and your dog
wouldn't do NUTHIN you told him. You had
to repeat your "commands" and even had to
give up commanding the dog and went over
to ARGUE and FIGHT with him, just as you
told the cops THEY'D have to do if they didn't
have a nice shock collar like yours, but it wasn't
on the dog so your dog wasn't WORKIN for
the moment, eh FRAUDreck?

And a moment later you was physically
restraining your HOWETA CONTROL dog.

You've certainly HOWET done yourself, FRAUDreck.

Hey FRAUDreck? IMAGINE if you hadn't already
worked the dog for a long while on your shock
collar before removein it? You'd have had your
search party already organized, eh???

BWEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

>  I had just taken it off.

BWEEEEHAHAHAHHAHAHAAA!!!

Pretty EMBARRASSING, wasn't it.

>http://www.fredhassen.com/video/high_real/police-no_collar-high.ram

The dog DIDN'T WORK withHOWET the shock collar.

> >Fred Hassen
> >www.fredhassen.com
>
> Forgot to add that I top it off at the end by putting
> the decoy's bare hand in the dog's mouth at the end.

Oh, bye the bye FRAUDreck? That aggitator, wasn't
that your pal tom, your pal the dog catcher?

Didn't he ride over with Maddy settin on his lap?

What's the big deal with puttin the aggitator's hand
in the dog's MHOWETH, to show the dog ain't a REAL K-9?

She's his pal, ain't she, FRAUDreck. Your dog
ain't no goddamend K-9, FRAUDreck. Your dog
is a sleeve happy fearful critter that REFUSED
EVERY COMMAND soon as you took off your
SHOCK collar.

You're a FRAUD, FRAUDreck, JUST LIKE
HOWE The Amazing Puppy Wizard SEZ.

                      Your videos PROVE it.

Here is a video from Fred which I have a few concerns
about (and maybe Fred can weigh in if he sees fit), THE
SAME "FRED" that johnny would invite to heelp his
shelter dogs learn RESPECT.

This is a video about Nero being taught to get on
a skateboard.

http://www.studioonline.com/playvideos.asp?crypt=A7E284B9ABDFCE0F

or

http://tinyurl.com/389al
In this video, the dog is constantly jerking his
head all around. I'm not SHORE why he's doing that.
If he's doing it because he is being shocked repeatedly
into getting onto that skateboard, then it is my
opinion that Fred Hassen is a dog abuser in the
extreme. As would anyone be, no matter how much
"experience" they had shocking dogs, nor how
nationally "respected" they are/were.

If, HOWEver, the dog is jerking his head all around
because he is happy and for no other reason, well,
then, never mind. I've just never seen this kind of
behavior from a dog before, so maybe Fred can
explain what would cause a dog to move his head
like that.

Here's a other:
http://tinyurl.com/2v9oh
Even your PALS the "DOG LOVERS" on the
abuse groups were HOWEtraged by those stunts.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good
of its victims, may be the most oppressive. Those
who torment us for our own good will torment us
without end, for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis.

"Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny",
Aeschylus (525BC-456BC), Agamemnon.

"Only the unenlightened speak of wisdom and right action
as separate, not the wise. If any man knows one, he
enjoys the fruit of both. The level which is reached by
wisdom is attained through right action as well. He who
perceives that the two are one knows the truth."

"Even the wise man acts in character with his nature,
indeed all creatures act according to their natures.
What is the use of compulsion then? The love and
hate which are aroused by the objects of sense arise
from Nature, do not yield to them. They only obstruct
the path." Bhagavad Gita, adapted by Krishna with
permission from His FREE copy of my FREE Wits'
End Dog Training Method manual.

Force training JERRYIZES dogs, and GETS THEM DEAD.

       The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~  )  >

Subject: Re: I use an shock collar - I'm a dog abuser

HOWEDY tracy you freakin dog abusing mental case,

Tracy Doyle wrote:
> in article 1131405322.831373.71...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, Ronna at
> dogstar...@aol.com wrote on 11/7/05 5:15 PM:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> association with a low-level stim (which is NOT at all painful, BTW,
> nor even unpleasant):

HOWE COME do you suppose your own dogs have been in the
behavior clinic at Purdue for OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDERS?

> http://www.sitmeanssit.com/articles/article_attention_heeling.htm

HOWE COME do you suppose FRAUDreck doesn't post here nomore?

> This is one trainer

FRAUDreck is a coward and dog abuser.

>  and one method for one behavior,

ALL temperament and behavior problems are the same same.

> so it certainly doesn't cover the entire topic,

Well YES, it DOES. It covers the REASON you bums CANNOT
train your dogs despite your shock collars.

>  but it's a good start.

INDEEDY.

> Regards,

You're a dog abusing mental case.

> Tracy

Here's FRAUDRECK gettin JERRYIZED again:

Subject: "Dog Training For The Real World" - A Joke, By FRAUDreck
hassan.

"Granted That The Dog Who Fears Retribution
Will Adore His Owner," wm koehler.

                 "Dog Training For The Real World" -
                                      A Joke,
                            By FRAUDreck hassan.

BWWWAAHAHAHAAAA!!!

Date: 2002-03-02 16:17:51 PST

Hello People,

Here's our self professed expert fraudreck
showing his dog training bloomers:

>From: FREDERICK HASSEN (FHAS...@webtv.net)
>Date: 1999/09/01

> Here is my latest article to Dog Sport Magazine,
> which will appear next month.

Is this the one teaching us to put holes in the collar
to make it fit little doggies?

> Teaching "attention" heeling with an electronic collar.

This is ridiculous. fraudreck is going to hurt the dog every time
it looks away from him and think he's trained his dog to adore
him.

It's all for show, the dog HATES the training and has
no choice, as it should be, if the dog is trained properly,
but not by hurting him every time he doesn't look at you
as fraudreck teaches.

> In this article, I will go over some steps in
> teaching 'attention' heeling with an electronic collar.

An exercise in futility, strictly to stroke the ego
of the alphalpha duminance "trainer."

> If you are not familiar with an electronic collar,
> or it's operation, I would suggest that you attend
> a Tritronics seminar, or one given by someone
> off of their pro-staff.

Yeah, a salesman. Like you, fraudreck.

>People are constantly wondering how you can
>teach stuff like this in its infancy stages

"Infancy stages?" Dog lovers have been
BURNING dogs for thirty years.

> without a negative association to the electric collar.

Oh. That's EZ. You can't. Dogs don't LIKE
being shocked, fraudreck.

> I want to make it clear that most of the high-tech
> collars that Tritronics makes are adjustable to suit
> the dog's temperament.

And I want to make it clear that it doesn't
matter HOWE MUCH you HURT and INTIMIDATE,
any pain fear or force in training is inappropriate
and abusive.

> It can be adjusted lower than most dogs can even perceive.

So that means you can't use it. Big deal.
Turn it on and the dog will sh.t and piss
himself, fraudreck.

You're quite the salesman if you think
shutting off the juice and telling us the
collar don't hurt is going to make us
think that turning it on and burning the
dog till his learns to shut it off is going
to be appreciated by our dogs and not
make them angry.

> The easiest way to start this, is to kneel
> down next to the dog with a food treat in
> your mouth.

Because the dog would have no desire to look at you otherwise.

> When the dog is looking away, lightly tap him with the collar

You mean shock him if he looks away from you, fraudreck.

> until he looks at you,

And what do you suppose the dog is gonna think?
You got that cookie and you're hurting him. Means
to me, I got to take that cookie outta your yap and
throw you to the ground and growl into your throat
and bite you on your ear till you smarten the heel
up, fraudreck.

That's what it would mean to me if I was a dog
an you was pullin that crap on me.

> then give him the hotdog.

I wouldn't give you the chance, and I wouldn't
take it when offered. I'd rip you off for it or ignore
it and bite you if you forced it on me.

> If you have a problem with the dog taking food
> from your mouth,

Then you should rethink what you've been doing
to him under the disguise of training.

> or he's a little rough,

That's what should be worked on long before hurting the dog for
not adoring the goddamned weenie hangin outta your yap.

> you can put your hand in front of your mouth
> with the hotdog or treat in it.

To protect your face from the dog you've been shocking.

> The purpose of the kneeling, is that it simplifies
> the dog looking at you at this early stage---since
> you are down to his level.

Because you can't entice the dog to be interested
in you because you HURT him. That hot dog isn't
YOU, that hot dog might as well be a garbage can,
and you might as well be a fire hydrant next to it.

> I would not give any command at this point. The
> reason for no command, is that the dog does not
> understand the collar yet, and has not had enough
> repetitions to link the "tapping" to the treat.

The shock, fraudreck. You think the semantics are
important to the dog?

> We are trying to elicit from the dog, the motion
> of turning to look up at you when he feels the tap.

When you shock him you want him to think of taking
a weenie outta your mouth.

Better lock your dog in his crate when you entertain, fraudreck.

> In other words, 'tap' means '

SHOCK. That's what you do every time the dog
takes ITS eyes off you.

> look up at me cause there is food up here',

Right, and that shock is just cause he didn't look at the weenies.

> and then you will verify it every time.

You mean you'll SHOCK him every
time he looks away from your weenie.

> If the dog is not looking at you, continue
> the tapping (low level 'nicks' of the collar
> are preferable).

Can't you say SHOCK, fraudreck?

That's HOWE COME you refuse to do
my dual shock collar challenge, fraudreck.

LET'S SEE. Put up or shut up.

>Only the act of looking up at you, will make the 'nicks' cease,

Let's see you accept my dual shock collar challenge,
you lying dog abusing Thug. Go for it fraudreck, you'll
shut me up in one fell swoop.

YOU CAN'T. You're a liar and I've caught you lying.

> and the dog will be instantly rewarded with the treat.

Yeah? I got a $1000.00 dollar cash treat, a seminar
I'll organize for you, and I'll sell and train for you for
six months and I'll EAT MY HAT at the seminar,
fraudreck.

GO FOR IT, you miserable coward
blowhard dog abusing lying Thug.

Go for it.

You can't, cause you'll shock yourself,
and that would make you SHY fraudreck.

Get the heel outta here.

> You can slowly raise yourself from the kneeling position,

Stay on your knees, fraudreck. It becomes you.

> until the dog still associates the 'nick' with
> looking at you while you are standing, then
> you can cease the kneeling altogether.

Kinda like I stay on you bums till you get the heel outtat here?

>  I would then start challenging the dog by 'nicking'
> at various times when he is not expecting it,

I see. You want the weenie to be the fall guy?

BWWAAAAHAHAHAAA!!!

The dog knows YOU are the bum with the finger
on the big red button marked BURN.

> and seeing that he knows to look up at you to shut off the 'nick',

HOWE COME you can't find the word BURN, fraudreck?

> and get his treat.

For looking at your weenie.

>????Another good way to introduce this is to
>put the dog's dry food kibbles that are going
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>give him a portion until he has had all of his
>meals worth.

Well, that's a lot of shocking I'd say. No wonder
fraudreck won't wear the same collar the dog is
wearing.

>  He will soon be looking forward to the tapping.

Well, does that mean you'll accept my $1000.00
and the rest of my contract for demonstrating your
shock collar by wearing it the same as the dog gets, FRAUDRECK?

> Because of the distraction outside, you may find
> yourself going up a few notches because of the
> added excitement of the outside environment.

INDEED??? Imagine that when you're wearing the
same collar the dog is, you miserable coward lying
dog abusing Thug. Get the heel outta here.

> The levelthat was working in the house, may be
> completely ineffective outside, so you have to adjust
> accordingly.

EXACTLY. That's HOWE COME you won't accept
my challenges you lying dog abusing Thug coward.

> When your dog starts showing that he understands the tapping,

SHOCK, fraudreck. Call a spade a spade. Prove
you're not a LIAR and a DOG ABUSER by accepting
my dual shock collar challenge or get outta this business.

> and is looking up when it occurs on a consistent basis,

Like you and your pals call for killfiling Jerry, hmm?

> I would then overlay the "heel" or "foos", or whatever
> command at that time. You do not want the dog thinking
> that "heel" means "look around and try to figure out with
> that strange tapping is".

Right. And that's when my HIGH STAKES challenge
comes into effect.

That's when you an me cross paths and we stop to
chit chat, and I whack you out while your NATIONAL
CHUMPION ATTACK DOG Maddy refuses to look at
me, and I take her to my HOWES, never to be HURT
again, fraudreck.

> The beauty of the collar is that you can completely
> disassociate yourself from the tapping, and when
> the dog is confused-----

You THINK so. The dog knows you got
that button, fraudreck.

You're a liar.

> rather than a leash tug,

You mean CHOKE the dog, FRAUDreck.

Don't insult our intelligence or that of the dog you
can't outwit or you'd never NEED to HURT him from
jump street.

> you can happily get his attention back to you
> with whatever body language is needed.

A weenie and a shock are required fraudreck, and you know it.

> Your dog will soon know that the tapping is not
> just a random act,

The dog will know that YOU are intentionally BURNING him.

>  and that he, and he alone is responsible for controlling it.

The dog ain't stupid, frauddie.

> The timing that you can achieve with the collar is virtually
> unmatched in other methods.

?

Bunk.

You HURT dogs cause you're not bright enough
to OUTWIT them or you wouldn't NEED to HURT
them in the first place.

You like to say the SHOCK COLLAR doesn't HURT
fraudreck, but I call you a liar and you refuse to accept
my dual shock collar to prove you ain't.

You're outta gas.

> Your dog has now had nothing but a pleasant
> beginning association with the electronic collar.

You think so? You won't wear the same collar, fraudreck.

>You will soon see that dog's tail wagging like crazy
> when he feels that tap.

THAT'S ANXIETY.

Show us. You're always shootin your mouth of about
SHOWIN us. Go ahead, make my day you miserable
doubletalker.

> We now want to establish habit with that behavior.

You mean moore shocking.

> The dog now has a choice,

Is that so, fraudreck? You're so childlike I could just hug you.

> and will learn more responsibility with his behavior.

Yes, as soon as you demonstrate HOWE gently
you train these dogs.

> Also, I would further add learning to this by establishing
> the dog maintain the 'heel' position while you are stationary.
> In other words, while standing completely still, you should
> be able to say "heel" and the dog's head come right up into
> looking at you.

Yeah, as he'll be standing next to me in front of that fence
with the three barking dogs behind it, while we chit chat about
attack dog training, and I walk off with your national association
of protection dogs champion a couple years running, as my dog,
never to be BURNED again, fraudreck.

Put your dog on the line, and I'll match it with my butt. Let's
SEE.

> You may not be moving,

NOT A BREATH.

> but it's still a 'heel' position.

The only thing that'll be moving are the dogs
behind me and my fist when I take a backhander
at you.

> As the dog looks away, tap him with the collar

You mean SHOCK.

> until he's back into position,

That won't be necessary or allowed in this demo.

Nothing can be said after you ask Maddy to sit at
heel while you chit chat with Jerry.

> then shut the tapping off and immediately replace
> it with 'good heel'.

You've already done that thousands of times, that's
HOWE COME I'll stake my a.s on humiliating you
and winning your dog and puttin you outta business
and changing the name of your show from "sit means
sit" to "Sit, GOOD BOY, NICE DOG, that's a GOOD FELLA!"

> If he turns away, discontinue the praise, apply the tapping

SHOCKING, fraudreck. Get honest with yourself.

> and praise verbally with a 'good heel' as he comes back.

After the fact, fraudreck? If you can't punish AFTER, you can't
PRAISE, after, cause that would be INCONSISTENT and
CONTRAWISE, wouldn't it, if your THEORY is correct...and it ain't.

> This will continue while walking. Remember that
> the collar is doing alot of work for you,

SHOCKING.

> so it is totally inappropriate for you to ever have
> to raise your voice

You mean in FRUSTRATION, fraudreck?

> while using an electronic collar.

You mean while SHOCKING your dog.

> Yelling should not have more meaning of a command,
> than it would in a regular tone.

Unless your batteries wear out suddenly, as they tend to do.

> The electronic collar gives us the unique ability of raising the
>level of the collar to match the situation,

To HURT the dogs MOORE, as NEEDED.

Perhaps that's HOWE COME you refuse
my dual shock collar challenge, fraudreck.

> while we remain the good guy at all times.

You really do think the dog is less intelligent than you are?

>  This is a good initiation to the electric collar. ?

Oh, is that so? You didn't mention what happens
when the dog sh.ts and piss himself and runs away.

Did you FORGET to mention that part, fraudreck?

> You can purchase back orders of "Dog Sport"
> for other articles on conditioning with the collar.

And you'll find that our pal fraudreck is conditioning the dog
to be totally dependent on the shock collar against all the
experts advice. But it cinches up sales for him and he likes that.

>FRED HASSEN
>"SIT  MEANS SIT" Internet talkshow host
>http://www.lovemypets.com/sitmeanssit
>Sit Means Sit Dog Training (702-877-4581)
>             When your dog doesn't know:
>             "Sit from Shinola"

Got any response, fraudreck? j;~)
Kevin S. Wilson - 03 Dec 2005 21:03 GMT
<snip raving lunacy>

Who drug this loon into ARK again?
IHateToSayItButITOLDYOUSO@Inbox.Com - 03 Dec 2005 21:30 GMT
HOWEDY kevin,

> <snip raving lunacy>
>
> Who drug this loon into ARK again?

The Amazing Puppy Wizard JUST SEZ "NO!" to drugs:

HOWEDY jeff,

THAT'S HOWE COME The Amazing Puppy Wizard is BEGGIN
alt.religion.kibology to enter the dog trainin discussions:

> On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:31:43 -0500, Melinda Shore wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> well-behaved in the yard don't know that their dogs chase livestock when
> they're out on a wander.

   BWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHHAHHAAAA!!!

You punk thug coward mental cases can't even train your
own dogs DESPITE your pronged spiked pinch choke and shock
collars. REMEMBER jeff, you freakin halfwit?

Isn't that the same Jeff Dege who can't train
his own dog not to attack innocent defenseless
dumb critters despite his shock collar and
perfect come command?:

From: Jeff Dege <j...@jdege.visi.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:58:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Squirrell chasing / Prey drive !!!!

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:06:57 -0400, buzzsaw wrote:

> A Loose Leash !?!   Are you kidding me ... this
> dog is ready to go and the site of a squirell he
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I think the e collar is appropiate here?
> Although I never used one on him.

Won't make any difference.

I've been using an e-collar with my JRT, and it's
worked wonders for his recall.  But the one time
he bolted after something small and furry, he paid
no attention to the collar until after he'd brought
it to bay.

Jeff Dege.

BWEEEEEEEEEEEAAAHAHAHAHHAHAAA!!!

> "Deltones" <vibroverb@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1133497913.069709.297370
> @g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I'm still asking for 5 original posts from people here at least 5 years to
> support your initial contention.  You're 0 for 2, so far.

HOWEDY Borzoi,

Borzoi wrote:
> Chris McGonnell <smeagol@NOkey-net.net> wrote in
> news:6vp3p1p1mbqlbi8uvaj0hi4t49gi2b3gfu@4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Really?

INDEEDY.

> I hadn't heard about this before.

THAT'S HOWE COME The Amazing Puppy Wizard is callin
on alt.religion.kibology to HEELP SAVE US!

> Can you elaborate please?

For SHORE!~

> Borzoi

               Here's something your mumzie would like:
               Here's some excerpts from our force fetch
               page on k9web your pal cindy "don't let the dog
               SCREAM" mooreon threatened to sue us for
               infringement for discussing. I'm looking forward
               to having her demonstrate these advanced
               techniques in front of a criminal judge and jury
               for felony animal abuse.

               "Another excellent and more recent resource is
               the Tritronics Retrieving Manual Retriever
               Training by Jim and Phyllis Dobbs and Alice
               Woodyard, which despite its association with
               the Tritronics electronic collars has many excellent
               descriptions of training techniques that do not use
               the collar, including an overview of what they also
term
               the "conditioned retrieve." (This is not a promotion or
               condemnation of electronic collars; merely a note that
               the Retriever Training book is useful for the person
               without an electronic collar as well.)

               THE FORCE FETCH

               Alright! Now you are (finally) ready to force
               fetch your dog. I repeat, you want to have an
               experienced person help you out, someone
               who has already force fetched her own dogs
               whether for obedience or field.

              This step in the training entails what is termed
               avoidance behavior. In a nutshell, the dog is
               taught how to "turn off" a negative stimulus.
               He is carefully taught that he has complete
               control over it.

               This is a very effective way of teaching, but
               does require a more astute sense of timing
               than some other training methods and is very
               difficult for some people to do, for a variety of
               reasons.

               However, if the dog properly knows HOLD at
               this point, it's easily done with a minimum of
               fuss.

               Return to your quiet starting place, with the
               dog on a collar and leash in front of you,
               sitting quietly. Instead of opening his mouth
               as you have been for the HOLD, put your hand
               through the dog's collar (to hold
               him steady) and with your thumb and forefinger
               pinch the tip of his ears and say TAKE IT (or
               FETCH, or whatever you want)

               Watch his mouth closely -- the moment he
               opens his mouth, pop that dumbbell in, let go
               of his ear but not the collar, and PRAISE
               PRAISE PRAISE.

               Do this three or four times per session.

               When he is opening his mouth in anticipation
               of the dumbbell, the next step is to hold the
               dumbbell just past his lips. This next step is
               for him to move his head forward that inch (or
               half inch) necessary to get the dumbbell. At
               this point, he has a pretty good notion that
               getting that darned thing into his
               mouth is the way to turn off the ear pinch.

               Most dogs will lean forward and get it. That's
               his second milestone! Praise, praise, praise
               and repeat three or four times this session.
               Remember, I said these sessions were no
               more than 5 minutes or so each. That's still
               true.

               Gradually extend the distance so he has to
               reach further to get it. Now here is where a
               few subtleties come into play. It's not enough
               for him to merely reach out and grab it. You
               want him to commit to getting it. You want him
               to be intent on getting it. If he sort of
               limply reaches over and gets it, that's
               not what you want. If you pinch him but have
               to drag him toward the dumbbell, that's not
               what you want either. We're back to the
               visualization. What do you want him to do?

               You  want him to, if necessary, bust
               through just about anything to get that
               dumbbell. So hold on to that collar until you
               feel him pulling out of it to get that. That's
               his commitment.

               You want to say TAKE IT and
               have him just about explode out to get
               the dumbbell. As you get further along in
               this, you will release him when he's made a
               good commitment -- this will help shape a
               speedy response nicely.

               I think you can see why it helps to have an
               experienced person around when you are
               doing this!

               It can be difficult to keep all these
               things in mind when you are actually
               sitting there with a dog in your hands.

               About the ear pinch: You must keep the
               pressure up until the instant he has the
               dumbbell securely in his mouth. Many people
               have problems getting the pinch
               right, either they do not pinch enough, or
               they have a very stoic dog in which case case
               a collar may be needed to help make the pinch
               more effective.

               Also some dogs are screamers,
               and if they find that they can stop the
               pinching by screaming, they've learned
               the avoidance technique just fine -- but not
               with the behavior you had in mind!

               Don't let your dog scream. Use your hand to
               hold his muzzle closed and tell him to quit
               moaning. Some dogs will collapse into a heap.
               Don't let them do that, that's why your hand
               is in the collar.

              Hold them up and get them back into a sitting
              position.

               What your dog is doing is trying to find other
               ways of avoiding the ear pinch.

              You need to be firm and consistent and
               demonstrate that getting the dumbbell is the
               only means of avoidance.

               Remember to keep him under control. When
               he gets that dumbbell in his mouth, pull him
               gently around back to you and sit him back
               down. You may in fact want to sit him at your
               side in the heel position (whether or not he
               actually knows the heel position), hold the
               dumbbell in front of him, command him
               to take it and then pull him back to a front
               or finish position as you wish. The pattern
               will do him good later.

               The next major milestone is putting the
               dumbbell on the ground for him to pick up. For
               many dogs this can be a big deal and may be
               difficult. Set the dumbbell on the ground just
               in front of them, with your hand on
               the dumbbell.

               He may not reach for it, he may
               refuse -- keep up the ear pressure until he
               finally picks it up. If he really doesn't seem
               to understand this, then break this down into
               an intermediate step where you
               hold the dumbbell, but about 1/2 way between
               the ground and his mouth.

               Once he's picked the dumbbell off the ground,
               that's a major milestone and you are just
               about home free.

               As before slowly place the dumbbell further
               away on the ground in front of him. Make sure
               he is pulling out of your hold on the collar
               before you let him pick the dumbbell up. If he
               drops the dumbbell from this point on, you
               will  get control of him (put him in a
               sit with a firm hold on his collar) and pinch
               him back to the dumbbell -- he can pick it up
               now so there is no need for you to put it in
               his mouth any more. HE is the one responsible
               for getting it.

               When he is reliably picking up the dumbbell a
               few feet from you, then you can stop using the
               pinch at the beginning of the exercise.

               You will instead reserve it for when he drops
               the dumbbell or refuses to pick it up, etc. So
               for example, you might go out, place the
               dumbbell 6 feet away, put the long lead on
               him, tell him to take it.

               Let's say he hesitates and doesn't go out.
               Then you pinch, force him to commit, send
               him to the dumbbell. Let's say he goes and
               gets it, but starts playing with it. Pull him in,
               and if he hasn't already dropped the dumbbell,
               take it out of his mouth, put it back where it
               was, and pinch him to it.

               There is one last problem you need to watch
               for. Many dogs, especially retrievers, will
               start pouncing on the dumbbell once they are
               able to run out a few steps to it before
               picking it up.

               So transition to this point with a long cotton
               lead about 20-30 feet long. With this you can
               spin him round the moment he scoops up the
               dumbbell, teaching him that he cannot play
               with it.

              If your dog drops the dumbbell, use the lead
              to pull him back to you (do not let him try to
              pick it up), and pinch him back to it. the
              basic rule of thumb is that if he drops it, he
              will be pinched back to it regardless.

               Thoughts to Consider

               Force fetching is never completely done, per
               se (as with any exercise taught to a dog). You
               may need to do a refresher course when it's
               something new to pick up, or if it's something
               disgusting (like a very dead bird) to pick up.

               He may also start to get lazy,
               you need to keep an eye on him. You may also
               realize you omitted some step in training him
               that shows up later so you will have to go
               back and fix it.

               But you should also take care to make sure he
               doesn't forget any of these hard-earned
               lessons! Make him carry things for you. He can
               carry his own ball out to the park. He can
               carry his own utility articles to the
               ring. He can help you carry a light bag of
               groceries into the house. He can help you
               carry firewood. They will just love this, and
               it's a good way to keep the talents honed. Use
               it!" cindy title moore.

     And THAT'S HOWE COME sindy SADIST
     MOOREON doesbn't post here abHOWETS
     noMOORE.

The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~ )   >

HOWEDY chris,

Chris McGonnell wrote:
> On 3 Dec 2005 08:21:01 -0800, Dog Choker Howe wrote:
>
> > HOWEDY kibo fruitcakes,

Thank you for responding. The heelth of the WHOWEL WILD WORLD
DEPENDS on alt.religion.kibology to SAVE US from the needle.

> You aren't worthy of posting to r.p.d., you vicious DOG BEATER!

INDEEDY. You'll find the rest of the video evidence here:
http://fredhassen.neptune.com #11, fred and tim. Jerry
Howe is playin the part of fred. tim plays tim, and terri
willis plays Santos the dog bein BEATEN.

>  Oh yes, Nazi Howe, I've seen the secretly taped video of you
>  CRUELLY whipping a dog with your leather leash --

You'll also find Jerry Howe choking shocking and beating dogs on the
rest of the useless video evidence at http://fredhassen.neptune.com
and www.remotedogtraining.com

>the video so graphic 20/20 couldn't air it

SHAMEFOOL, AIN'T IT:

 Psychoclown terri willis wrote:
 Nope. That "beating dogs with sticks" things is
 something you twisted out of context, because you
 are full of bizarro manure.

Amy lyingfrosty dahl (oakhill kennels) LIES with a
straight face and says:

"I don't beat dogs, twist ears, or pinch toes. For the
benefit of anyone who is in doubt, and who chooses
not to read the article (SHE'D REALLY LIKE IT IF YOU
DON'T READ IT!), there is NO mention in it of "twisting
ears (INDEED, SHE PINCHES THEM WITH SPIKES).

I would never slap a dog (SHE TEACHES PEOPLE TO
BEAT DOGS WITH STICKS TO MOTIVATE THEM).

I would never advise anyone to slap a dog (SHE'S A
PROVEN LIAR AND DOG ABUSER, do you expect
her to ADMIT THE TRUTH???).

I do not believe there is a single circumstance, ever,
where slapping a dog is anything but destructive."

RIGHT. She PINCHES, not twists... and chin cuff
doesn't mean hit, it means chuck.  amy lyingfrosty dahl
continues:

"Get a stick 30- or 40-inches long. You can have a
helper wield the stick, or do it yourself. Tougher, less
tractable dogs may require you to progress to striking
them more sharply.

With your hand on the collar and ear, say, 'fetch.'

Immediately tap the dog on the hindquarters with the
stick. Repeat "fetch" and pinch the ear all the way to
the dummy.

Repeat, varying how hard you hit the dog,

Now you are ready to progress to what most people think of
as force-fetching: the ear pinch.

Make the dog's need to stop the pinching so urgent
that resisting your will fades in importance.

but will squeal, thrash around, and direct their
efforts to escaping the ear pinch

You can press the dog's ear with a shotshell instead
of your thumb;

even get a studded collar and pinch the ear against
that

Say "fetch" while pressing the dummy against its lips
and pinching its ear.

if the dog still does not open its mouth, get out the
shotshell.

Try pinching the ear between the metal casing and
the collar, even the buckle on the collar. Persist!
Eventually, the dog will give in"

> when that show aired its program of Internet con men
> who cheat honest people (in this case dog trainers) out
> of their HARD-EARNED money and then beat the poor
> dogs with cruel, cruel instruments.

We was just talkin abHOWET HOWE COME the POLICE SAR
dogs WOULDN'T FIND them three DEAD children in the trunk
of the car in Trenton, N.J. and WOULDN'T FIND Jessica Lundren
300' from her HOWES and WOULDN'T FIND Elizabeth Smart, ALL
with KNOWN STARTING POINTS, ALL EZ SIMPLE TRACKS for
ANY backyard bred untrained dog, ALL mishandled by POLICE
and SAR trainers using bribery shocking and choking.

> HOWE'd you like it if somebody beat YOU with a baseball bat,
> you DOG-ABUSING scum?

That's been tried. Didn't work, HOWEver.

> --
> Chris McG.
> Harming humanity since 1951.
> "McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia

Subject: Re: Lots more working dogs videos to see

HOWEDY FRAUDreck,

fredhas...@msn.com wrote:
> At this address:   http://tinyurl.com/bwdhg

We was just talkin abHOWET HOWE to use your thirty five
levels of medical grade static like stimulation in a NON
AVERSIVE manner.

> Fred Hassen's
> "No Limitations" remote dog training system
> and horses too!!!
> www.remotedogtraining.com

Date: 2004-06-14 16:25:51 PST

HOWEDY FRAUDreck,

> > Here is a clip taken at a police seminar

Was they arresting you for animal abuse
or FRAUD, FRAUDreck?

> > after I was asked to see how the dog
> > would perform without the collar on.

INDEEDY, FRAUDreck. Who's side are you on?
You SHORE came HOWET lookin like a CHUMP
in that video, eh?

You took that shock collar off and your dog
wouldn't do NUTHIN you told him. You had
to repeat your "commands" and even had to
give up commanding the dog and went over
to ARGUE and FIGHT with him, just as you
told the cops THEY'D have to do if they didn't
have a nice shock collar like yours, but it wasn't
on the dog so your dog wasn't WORKIN for
the moment, eh FRAUDreck?

And a moment later you was physically
restraining your HOWETA CONTROL dog.

You've certainly HOWET done yourself, FRAUDreck.

Hey FRAUDreck? IMAGINE if you hadn't already
worked the dog for a long while on your shock
collar before removein it? You'd have had your
search party already organized, eh???

BWEEEEEEAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

>  I had just taken it off.

BWEEEEHAHAHAHHAHAHAAA!!!

Pretty EMBARRASSING, wasn't it.

>http://www.fredhassen.com/video/high_real/police-no_collar-high.ram

The dog DIDN'T WORK withHOWET the shock collar.

> >Fred Hassen
> >www.fredhassen.com
>
> Forgot to add that I top it off at the end by putting
> the decoy's bare hand in the dog's mouth at the end.

Oh, bye the bye FRAUDreck? That aggitator, wasn't
that your pal tom, your pal the dog catcher?

Didn't he ride over with Maddy settin on his lap?

What's the big deal with puttin the aggitator's hand
in the dog's MHOWETH, to show the dog ain't a REAL K-9?

She's his pal, ain't she, FRAUDreck. Your dog
ain't no goddamend K-9, FRAUDreck. Your dog
is a sleeve happy fearful critter that REFUSED
EVERY COMMAND soon as you took off your
SHOCK collar.

You're a FRAUD, FRAUDreck, JUST LIKE
HOWE The Amazing Puppy Wizard SEZ.

                      Your videos PROVE it.

Here is a video from Fred which I have a few concerns
about (and maybe Fred can weigh in if he sees fit), THE
SAME "FRED" that johnny would invite to heelp his
shelter dogs learn RESPECT.

This is a video about Nero being taught to get on
a skateboard.

http://www.studioonline.com/playvideos.asp?crypt=A7E284B9ABDFCE0F

or

http://tinyurl.com/389al
In this video, the dog is constantly jerking his
head all around. I'm not SHORE why he's doing that.
If he's doing it because he is being shocked repeatedly
into getting onto that skateboard, then it is my
opinion that Fred Hassen is a dog abuser in the
extreme. As would anyone be, no matter how much
"experience" they had shocking dogs, nor how
nationally "respected" they are/were.

If, HOWEver, the dog is jerking his head all around
because he is happy and for no other reason, well,
then, never mind. I've just never seen this kind of
behavior from a dog before, so maybe Fred can
explain what would cause a dog to move his head
like that.

Here's a other:
http://tinyurl.com/2v9oh
Even your PALS the "DOG LOVERS" on the
abuse groups were HOWEtraged by those stunts.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good
of its victims, may be the most oppressive. Those
who torment us for our own good will torment us
without end, for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis.

"Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny",
Aeschylus (525BC-456BC), Agamemnon.

"Only the unenlightened speak of wisdom and right action
as separate, not the wise. If any man knows one, he
enjoys the fruit of both. The level which is reached by
wisdom is attained through right action as well. He who
perceives that the two are one knows the truth."

"Even the wise man acts in character with his nature,
indeed all creatures act according to their natures.
What is the use of compulsion then? The love and
hate which are aroused by the objects of sense arise
from Nature, do not yield to them. They only obstruct
the path." Bhagavad Gita, adapted by Krishna with
permission from His FREE copy of my FREE Wits'
End Dog Training Method manual.

Force training JERRYIZES dogs, and GETS THEM DEAD.

       The Amazing Puppy Wizard. <{} ; ~  )  >

Subject: Re: I use an shock collar - I'm a dog abuser

HOWEDY tracy you freakin dog abusing mental case,

Tracy Doyle wrote:
> in article 1131405322.831373.71...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, Ronna at
> dogstar...@aol.com wrote on 11/7/05 5:15 PM:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> association with a low-level stim (which is NOT at all painful, BTW,
> nor even unpleasant):

HOWE COME do you suppose your own dogs have been in the
behavior clinic at Purdue for OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDERS?

> http://www.sitmeanssit.com/articles/article_attention_heeling.htm

HOWE COME do you suppose FRAUDreck doesn't post here nomore?

> This is one trainer

FRAUDreck is a coward and dog abuser.

>  and one method for one behavior,

ALL temperament and behavior problems are the same same.

> so it certainly doesn't cover the entire topic,

Well YES, it DOES. It covers the REASON you bums CANNOT
train your dogs despite your shock collars.

>  but it's a good start.

INDEEDY.

> Regards,

You're a dog abusing mental case.

> Tracy

Here's FRAUDRECK gettin JERRYIZED again:

Subject: "Dog Training For The Real World" - A Joke, By FRAUDreck
hassan.

"Granted That The Dog Who Fears Retribution
Will Adore His Owner," wm koehler.

                 "Dog Training For The Real World" -
                                      A Joke,
                            By FRAUDreck hassan.

BWWWAAHAHAHAAAA!!!

Date: 2002-03-02 16:17:51 PST

Hello People,

Here's our self professed expert fraudreck
showing his dog training bloomers:

>From: FREDERICK HASSEN (FHAS...@webtv.net)
>Date: 1999/09/01

> Here is my latest article to Dog Sport Magazine,
> which will appear next month.

Is this the one teaching us to put holes in the collar
to make it fit little doggies?

> Teaching "attention" heeling with an electronic collar.

This is ridiculous. fraudreck is going to hurt the dog every time
it looks away from him and think he's trained his dog to adore
him.

It's all for show, the dog HATES the training and has
no choice, as it should be, if the dog is trained properly,
but not by hurting him every time he doesn't look at you
as fraudreck teaches.

> In this article, I will go over some steps in
> teaching 'attention' heeling with an electronic collar.

An exercise in futility, strictly to stroke the ego
of the alphalpha duminance "trainer."

> If you are not familiar with an electronic collar,
> or it's operation, I would suggest that you attend
> a Tritronics seminar, or one given by someone
> off of their pro-staff.

Yeah, a salesman. Like you, fraudreck.

>People are constantly wondering how you can
>teach stuff like this in its infancy stages

"Infancy stages?" Dog lovers have been
BURNING dogs for thirty years.

> without a negative association to the electric collar.

Oh. That's EZ. You can't. Dogs don't LIKE
being shocked, fraudreck.

> I want to make it clear that most of the high-tech
> collars that Tritronics makes are adjustable to suit
> the dog's temperament.

And I want to make it clear that it doesn't
matter HOWE MUCH you HURT and INTIMIDATE,
any pain fear or force in training is inappropriate
and abusive.

> It can be adjusted lower than most dogs can even perceive.

So that means you can't use it. Big deal.
Turn it on and the dog will sh.t and piss
himself, fraudreck.

You're quite the salesman if you think
shutting off the juice and telling us the
collar don't hurt is going to make us
think that turning it on and burning the
dog till his learns to shut it off is going
to be appreciated by our dogs and not
make them angry.

> The easiest way to start this, is to kneel
> down next to the dog with a food treat in
> your mouth.

Because the dog would have no desire to look at you otherwise.

> When the dog is looking away, lightly tap him with the collar

You mean shock him if he looks away from you, fraudreck.

> until he looks at you,

And what do you suppose the dog is gonna think?
You got that cookie and you're hurting him. Means
to me, I got to take that cookie outta your yap and
throw you to the ground and growl into your throat
and bite you on your ear till you smarten the heel
up, fraudreck.

That's what it would mean to me if I was a dog
an you was pullin that crap on me.

> then give him the hotdog.

I wouldn't give you the chance, and I wouldn't
take it when offered. I'd rip you off for it or ignore
it and bite you if you forced it on me.

> If you have a problem with the dog taking food
> from your mouth,

Then you should rethink what you've been doing
to him under the disguise of training.

> or he's a little rough,

That's what should be worked on long before hurting the dog for
not adoring the goddamned weenie hangin outta your yap.

> you can put your hand in front of your mouth
> with the hotdog or treat in it.

To protect your face from the dog you've been shocking.

> The purpose of the kneeling, is that it simplifies
> the dog looking at you at this early stage---since
> you are down to his level.

Because you can't entice the dog to be interested
in you because you HURT him. That hot dog isn't
YOU, that hot dog might as well be a garbage can,
and you might as well be a fire hydrant next to it.

> I would not give any command at this point. The
> reason for no command, is that the dog does not
> understand the collar yet, and has not had enough
> repetitions to link the "tapping" to the treat.

The shock, fraudreck. You think the semantics are
important to the dog?

> We are trying to elicit from the dog, the motion
> of turning to look up at you when he feels the tap.

When you shock him you want him to think of taking
a weenie outta your mouth.

Better lock your dog in his crate when you entertain, fraudreck.

> In other words, 'tap' means '

SHOCK. That's what you do every time the dog
takes ITS eyes off you.

> look up at me cause there is food up here',

Right, and that shock is just cause he didn't look at the weenies.

> and then you will verify it every time.

You mean you'll SHOCK him every
time he looks away from your weenie.

> If the dog is not looking at you, continue
> the tapping (low level 'nicks' of the collar
> are preferable).

Can't you say SHOCK, fraudreck?

That's HOWE COME you refuse to do
my dual shock collar challenge, fraudreck.

LET'S SEE. Put up or shut up.

>Only the act of looking up at you, will make the 'nicks' cease,

Let's see you accept my dual shock collar challenge,
you lying dog abusing Thug. Go for it fraudreck, you'll
shut me up in one fell swoop.

YOU CAN'T. You're a liar and I've caught you lying.

> and the dog will be instantly rewarded with the treat.

Yeah? I got a $1000.00 dollar cash treat, a seminar
I'll organize for you, and I'll sell and train for you for
six months and I'll EAT MY HAT at the seminar,
fraudreck.

GO FOR IT, you miserable coward
blowhard dog abusing lying Thug.

Go for it.

You can't, cause you'll shock yourself,
and that would make you SHY fraudreck.

Get the heel outta here.

> You can slowly raise yourself from the kneeling position,

Stay on your knees, fraudreck. It becomes you.

> until the dog still associates the 'nick' with
> looking at you while you are standing, then
> you can cease the kneeling altogether.

Kinda like I stay on you bums till you get the heel outtat here?

>  I would then start challenging the dog by 'nicking'
> at various times when he is not expecting it,

I see. You want the weenie to be the fall guy?

BWWAAAAHAHAHAAA!!!

The dog knows YOU are the bum with the finger
on the big red button marked BURN.

> and seeing that he knows to look up at you to shut off the 'nick',

HOWE COME you can't find the word BURN, fraudreck?

> and get his treat.

For looking at your weenie.

>????Another good way to introduce this is to
>put the dog's dry food kibbles that are going
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>give him a portion until he has had all of his
>meals worth.

Well, that's a lot of shocking I'd say. No wonder
fraudreck won't wear the same collar the dog is
wearing.

>  He will soon be looking forward to the tapping.

Well, does that mean you'll accept my $1000.00
and the rest of my contract for demonstrating your
shock collar by wearing it the same as the dog gets, FRAUDRECK?

> Because of the distraction outside, you may find
> yourself going up a few notches because of the
> added excitement of the outside environment.

INDEED??? Imagine that when you're wearing the
same collar the dog is, you miserable coward lying
dog abusing Thug. Get the heel outta here.

> The levelthat was working in the house, may be
> completely ineffective outside, so you have to adjust
> accordingly.

EXACTLY. That's HOWE COME you won't accept
my challenges you lying dog abusing Thug coward.

> When your dog starts showing that he understands the tapping,

SHOCK, fraudreck. Call a spade a spade. Prove
you're not a LIAR and a DOG ABUSER by accepting
my dual shock collar challenge or get outta this business.

> and is looking up when it occurs on a consistent basis,

Like you and your pals call for killfiling Jerry, hmm?

> I would then overlay the "heel" or "foos", or whatever
> command at that time. You do not want the dog thinking
> that "heel" means "look around and try to figure out with
> that strange tapping is".

Right. And that's when my HIGH STAKES challenge
comes into effect.

That's when you an me cross paths and we stop to
chit chat, and I whack you out while your NATIONAL
CHUMPION ATTACK DOG Maddy refuses to look at
me, and I take her to my HOWES, never to be HURT
again, fraudreck.

> The beauty of the collar is that you can completely
> disassociate yourself from the tapping, and when
> the dog is confused-----

You THINK so. The dog knows you got
that button, fraudreck.

You're a liar.

> rather than a leash tug,

You mean CHOKE the dog, FRAUDreck.

Don't insult our intelligence or that of the dog you
can't outwit or you'd never NEED to HURT him from
jump street.

> you can happily get his attention back to you
> with whatever body language is needed.

A weenie and a shock are required fraudreck, and you know it.

> Your dog will soon know that the tapping is not
> just a random act,

The dog will know that YOU are intentionally BURNING him.

>  and that he, and he alone is responsible for controlling it.

The dog ain't stupid, frauddie.

> The timing that you can achieve with the collar is virtually
> unmatched in other methods.

?

Bunk.

You HURT dogs cause you're not bright enough
to OUTWIT them or you wouldn't NEED to HURT
them in the first place.

You like to say the SHOCK COLLAR doesn't HURT
fraudreck, but I call you a liar and you refuse to accept
my dual shock collar to prove you ain't.

You're outta gas.

> Your dog has now had nothing but a pleasant
> beginning association with the electronic collar.

You think so? You won't wear the same collar, fraudreck.

>You will soon see that dog's tail wagging like crazy
> when he feels that tap.

THAT'S ANXIETY.

Show us. You're always shootin your mouth of about
SHOWIN us. Go ahead, make my day you miserable
doubletalker.

> We now want to establish habit with that behavior.

You mean moore shocking.

> The dog now has a choice,

Is that so, fraudreck? You're so childlike I could just hug you.

> and will learn more responsibility with his behavior.

Yes, as soon as you demonstrate HOWE gently
you train these dogs.

> Also, I would further add learning to this by establishing
> the dog maintain the 'heel' position while you are stationary.
> In other words, while standing completely still, you should
> be able to say "heel" and the dog's head come right up into
> looking at you.

Yeah, as he'll be standing next to me in front of that fence
with the three barking dogs behind it, while we chit chat about
attack dog training, and I walk off with your national association
of protection dogs champion a couple years running, as my dog,
never to be BURNED again, fraudreck.

Put your dog on the line, and I'll match it with my butt. Let's
SEE.

> You may not be moving,

NOT A BREATH.

> but it's still a 'heel' position.

The only thing that'll be moving are the dogs
behind me and my fist when I take a backhander
at you.

> As the dog looks away, tap him with the collar

You mean SHOCK.

> until he's back into position,

That won't be necessary or allowed in this demo.

Nothing can be said after you ask Maddy to sit at
heel while you chit chat with Jerry.

> then shut the tapping off and immediately replace
> it with 'good heel'.

You've already done that thousands of times, that's
HOWE COME I'll stake my a.s on humiliating you
and winning your dog and puttin you outta business
and changing the name of your show from "sit means
sit" to "Sit, GOOD BOY, NICE DOG, that's a GOOD FELLA!"

> If he turns away, discontinue the praise, apply the tapping

SHOCKING, fraudreck. Get honest with yourself.

> and praise verbally with a 'good heel' as he comes back.

After the fact, fraudreck? If you can't punish AFTER, you can't
PRAISE, after, cause that would be INCONSISTENT and
CONTRAWISE, wouldn't it, if your THEORY is correct...and it ain't.

> This will continue while walking. Remember that
> the collar is doing alot of work for you,

SHOCKING.

> so it is totally inappropriate for you to ever have
> to raise your voice

You mean in FRUSTRATION, fraudreck?

> while using an electronic collar.

You mean while SHOCKING your dog.

> Yelling should not have more meaning of a command,
> than it would in a regular tone.

Unless your batteries wear out suddenly, as they tend to do.

> The electronic collar gives us the unique ability of raising the
>level of the collar to match the situation,

To HURT the dogs MOORE, as NEEDED.

Perhaps that's HOWE COME you refuse
my dual shock collar challenge, fraudreck.

> while we remain the good guy at all times.

You really do think the dog is less intelligent than you are?

>  This is a good initiation to the electric collar. ?

Oh, is that so? You didn't mention what happens
when the dog sh.ts and piss himself and runs away.

Did you FORGET to mention that part, fraudreck?

> You can purchase back orders of "Dog Sport"
> for other articles on conditioning with the collar.

And you'll find that our pal fraudreck is conditioning the dog
to be totally dependent on the shock collar against all the
experts advice. But it cinches up sales for him and he likes that.

>FRED HASSEN
>"SIT  MEANS SIT" Internet talkshow host
>http://www.lovemypets.com/sitmeanssit
>Sit Means Sit Dog Training (702-877-4581)
>             When your dog doesn't know:
>             "Sit from Shinola"

Got any response, fraudreck? j;~)
unsurreality_2005@yahoo.com - 04 Dec 2005 00:37 GMT
> HOWEDY kevin,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The Amazing Puppy Wizard JUST SEZ "NO!" to drugs:

You better start saying "YES!" - at the very least they can't make you
any more insane or ignorant than you already are!