Cat Forum / General Topics / July 2006
My cat died while getting declawed! :-(
|
|
Thread rating:  |
XeNO - 28 Jul 2005 06:22 GMT Aside from being completely heartbroken, I need to know since some people have started telling me that it sounds possibly more like incompetence.
I know it won't bring my babygirl back, but I need some opinions...
She was 3, and the only reason we decided to get her declawed was because we had tried almost every other type of training/alternative to keep it from furniture. Trust me when I say she could have all the furniture if she could come back...
At any rate, we paid to get the laser surgery because we wanted it to be as painless as possible, and paid to have her blood tested.
The vet said basically that the surgery went according to protocol until they went to reviver her. She wouldn't respond. Then 3 different people tried to inject epinephrine into her heart, but that she must have had a small heart because they couldn't find it. This was at a supposed cat specialist clinic as well... we thought she was as safe as could be...
It makes no sense, we adopted her from the Humane Society when she was 10 months old, and she had been spayed there. Ours does a good job, but they don't strike me as the type that would check a cat's heart size in order to get them spayed.
I would especially appreciate any veterinarians to respond to this post.
I know it won't bring her back, but if it sounds like they may have done something wrong I will be seriously pissed off!
I just want my girl back. I know she can't, but... you know. :-(
--Matt
Niel Humphreys - 28 Jul 2005 07:07 GMT > Aside from being completely heartbroken, I need to know since some people > have started telling me that it sounds possibly more like incompetence. > > I know it won't bring my babygirl back, but I need some opinions... The only incompetence here is on your part getting your cat mutiliated. I doubt you will find many people in here sympathetic to your cause enough to offer advice.
The only sympathy I have is to your poor kitty who paid the ultimate price for your vanity. If you didn't want a pet with claws you should have got a f.cking goldfish.
 Signature
Niel H
XeNO - 28 Jul 2005 08:45 GMT >>Aside from being completely heartbroken, I need to know since some people >>have started telling me that it sounds possibly more like incompetence. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > for your vanity. If you didn't want a pet with claws you should have got a > f.cking goldfish. f.ck YOU you goddamned a.shole! The last thing I need right now is some pompous, arrogant spiel from someone who couldn't tell a heart from a nail.
I wish I could meet you in person. People are always more courageous when they never have to show their face.
It's not like I'm just like "Oh gosh, my cat died," You don't go up to someone who lost their best friend and say, "It's your own fault you incompetent prick." EVEN IF IT WAS. Don't you damn well think I'd take it back if I could you a.shole? I've shed more tears for this cat than I did when my best friend hung himself in '99. More than when my grandpa died. Go to f.cking hell you insensitive PRICK!
I'm a grown man who just cried for god knows how much time about CLEANING THE CATBOX FOR THE FINAL TIME!
You know what... I really must be wasting my time here. If you and everyone else in this newsgroup can only offer venom to someone desperate for answers, solace--anything, not even the bare minimum of politeness that one would normally offer a complete stranger, you go burn in your own self-righteous hell you pretentious f.ck.
I hate you. I've never said that to a person before. Never said it and meant it. Never to someone I just met.
To anyone else that thinks his comments were appropriate, f.ck off as well. I'm done here, I'm done with people. I don't need goddamn anyone.
shortfuse - 28 Jul 2005 13:14 GMT Listen...I understand, XeNO...There is alot of controversy over whether one should declaw a cat or not. All my cats are declawed. I, like you, tried not to do this, but I did. That person who responded to your grief was not very nice, to say the least. He/She should had shown some tact. My heart goes out to you. I wish I could bring your babygirl back. May be it was because she was 3 yrs old. I usually had my cats declawed while they were being spayed or neutered at 6-8 months. Who knows..but I do know there is another kitty out there who would love to have a home and try to fill that gap you are feeling now. Take care.
>>>Aside from being completely heartbroken, I need to know since some people >>>have started telling me that it sounds possibly more like incompetence. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > To anyone else that thinks his comments were appropriate, f.ck off as > well. I'm done here, I'm done with people. I don't need goddamn anyone. 223rem - 31 Jul 2005 23:59 GMT > Listen...I understand, XeNO...There is alot of controversy over whether one > should declaw a cat or not. All my cats are declawed. That's great.
Hey, how about you, are you neutered yet? Or you have unfortunately reproduced?
L Sternn - 02 Aug 2005 04:50 GMT >Listen...I understand, XeNO...There is alot of controversy over whether one >should declaw a cat or not. All my cats are declawed. I, like you, tried not >to do this, but I did. You "tried" not to have your cat declawed?
I guess you didn't try very hard. I got a cat unexpectedly and when I found out what declawing actually entailed, I decided I'd see how bad it would be. She sometimes claws things she shouldn't, but she does know better and she has plenty of things she is allowe to scratch to her hearts content.
I wouldn't say I tried not to have her declawed. I would say I simply decided not to do it. I don't even have to trim her claws.
EADGBE - 28 Jul 2005 13:24 GMT Hi, Matt:
If it helps at all, I for one think that Niel Humphrey's comments were COMPLETELY out of line. He was indeed an "insensitive prick" for treating you the way that he did. GO STRAIGHT TO HELL, NIEL, WHOEVER YOU ARE.
I can't say that I am in favor of de-clawing either, but I know grief when I hear it, having lost my beloved Albert almost 2 weeks ago (he ran away). Unlike that j.rkoff Niel, I can put aside my own views about de-clawing to try to offer some comfort...it's the least I can do, since so many nice people offered ME words of encouragement when Albert went away.
I am very sorry for your loss and to some degree, I know *exactly* how you feel.
I have never heard of a cat dying when being de-clawed, but I do have some advice for you. Maybe it will help, maybe not.
Could you contact another vet in your area who de-claws cats and WITHOUT TELLING HIM YOUR STORY, find out if they have ever lost any cats during the de-clawing process? In other words, try to get some background information on just how rare or common death is during a de-clawing operaton. Try to find out how "unique" your case is. Also, see if you can contact the state veterinary examining board in your state to see if any complaints have been previously made against this person. One more thing: I'm pretty sure that you had to sign some papers before they began working on your cat. Do you still have those papers? Read them VERY carefully. See if there is any mention of risk and/or if there is an explanation of what potential dangers the operation had.
Good luck, Matt. Once again, please accept my condolences on the loss of your little girl.
--Andy
Ivor Jones - 30 Jul 2005 14:23 GMT > Hi, Matt: > > If it helps at all, I for one think that Niel Humphrey's comments > were COMPLETELY out of line. He was indeed an "insensitive prick" > for treating you the way that he did. GO STRAIGHT TO HELL, NIEL, > WHOEVER YOU ARE. I don't agree with his comments, although I do agree with his sentiment. What I'd like to know is why this barbaric practice is still allowed in the US. I know it's been outlawed in some states but it's still prevalent.
The US and Canada are, AFAIK, the only places in the *world* that still allow this mutilation. IMHO any so-called "vet" that practices it should be removed from the register like a human doctor being struck off. Or maybe given the same treatment.
How would *you* like it done to *you* I wonder..?
Ivor (in the UK)
Barrnabas Collins - 30 Jul 2005 15:36 GMT >I don't agree with his comments, although I do agree with his sentiment. >What I'd like to know is why this barbaric practice is still allowed in >the US. I know it's been outlawed in some states but it's still prevalent. One of the reasons for it is pets are considered property, and you can do whatever you want with property. That view is changing, but the change is very slow.
It won't happen for a lot of years. ------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
223rem - 01 Aug 2005 14:24 GMT > To anyone else that thinks his comments were appropriate, f.ck off as > well. I'm done here, I'm done with people. I don't need goddamn anyone. You're right. Best thing for you is suicide.
Pookie - 28 Jul 2005 14:40 GMT > > Aside from being completely heartbroken, I need to know since some people > > have started telling me that it sounds possibly more like incompetence. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Niel H I don't think this rude response is necessary. Some people believe in declawing, others don't. Its kind of similar to circumcision in that way. Would you tell a mother who got her son circumcized that she had mutilated him. Have a heart. If you are a cat lover, that's good, because you seem to have difficulty relating to people.
Niel Humphreys - 28 Jul 2005 15:37 GMT > Some people believe in > declawing, others don't. Its kind of similar to circumcision in that > way. Would you tell a mother who got her son circumcized that she had > mutilated him. Have a heart. If you are a cat lover, that's good, > because you seem to have difficulty relating to people. er.. declawing is illegal in many countries (and many USA states), it's not a case of what you believe. Look down at your hands and imagine having your fingertips, up to the first knuckle, being cut off. THAT is what happens when a cat is declawed, fancy it?
Read this and you'll never sympathise with cat mutilators like Xeno and Shortfuse again. http://www.declawing.com/
Niel H
todd@copelandhome.net - 28 Jul 2005 16:21 GMT > er.. declawing is illegal in many countries (and many USA states), it's not > a case of what you believe. Look down at your hands and imagine having your > fingertips, up to the first knuckle, being cut off. THAT is what happens > when a cat is declawed, fancy it? In what US states is de-clawing illegal. Please provide the names to back up this claim.
> Read this and you'll never sympathise with cat mutilators like Xeno and > Shortfuse again. > http://www.declawing.com/ This person is pushing his merchandise on this site and this should be considered along with his opinion.
Question, is cutting out the genitals of a cat any less cruel? There certainly are less extreme measures to prevent cats from breeding but most people recommend cutting away the organs of the cat instead. Are your cats spayed/neutered? I'm not against it, I just understand that each person has their own views on the subject.
Niel Humphreys - 28 Jul 2005 16:35 GMT >> er.. declawing is illegal in many countries (and many USA states), it's >> not [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > In what US states is de-clawing illegal. Please provide the names to > back up this claim. OK my error I was typing from memory after reading a similar thread in alt.cats some time ago. Perhaps "Many US vets refuse to practice this barbaric operation" would be more suitable. The fact remains that the USA is one of the only major developed countries that has not yet outlawed this abuse - the fact that so many countries have made it illegal to rip a cat's claws out sort of gives the impression that it's not a very nice thing to do don't you think?
>> Read this and you'll never sympathise with cat mutilators like Xeno and >> Shortfuse again. >> http://www.declawing.com/ > > This person is pushing his merchandise on this site and this should be > considered along with his opinion. In the thread I referred to above there was also a more suitable URL (far more graphic and to the point) but I can't find it or remember it - that site had no advertisements, just explanations and photographic evidence of the physical and behavioural problems that can result from declawing.
> Question, is cutting out the genitals of a cat any less cruel? There > certainly are less extreme measures to prevent cats from breeding but > most people recommend cutting away the organs of the cat instead. Are > your cats spayed/neutered? I'm not against it, I just understand that > each person has their own views on the subject. Ripping out a cat's first line of defence can hardly be compared to neutering them. You'll have to try better than that to justify declawing cats as being anywhere near acceptable.
Ditty - 28 Jul 2005 16:42 GMT >The fact remains that the USA is >one of the only major developed countries that has not yet outlawed this >abuse - the fact that so many countries have made it illegal to rip a cat's >claws out sort of gives the impression that it's not a very nice thing to do >don't you think? Yeah, and in some countries, cats are a main entree on the menu.
Sorry, sometimes declawing is the humane thing to do.
 Signature Ditty "Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as gods. Cats have never forgotten this." (anonymous)
http://www.dearauntnettie.com http://www.dearauntnettie.com/museum http://www.dearauntnettie.com/gallery
whayface - 28 Jul 2005 21:38 GMT >>The fact remains that the USA is >>one of the only major developed countries that has not yet outlawed this [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Sorry, sometimes declawing is the humane thing to do. I think I will put my 1/2 cent in here also.
If it came down to declawing and death I wonder what these bleeding heart anti-declawers would choose ?!?!?! I found two strays and my ex said she would take them if they were declawed. Well I called the county shelter and the Humane Society. The shelter said they would keep them 3 days and the Humane Society said they had no room and to take them to the county shelter. I ran an ad in paper almost a week with no callers. All the people I knew had enough cats and wanted no more or were anti cat!! So it was death, declaw or leave on the streets and where they were both only about 8 weeks I figured their chances would not be too good for survival.
Let me say that I have 4 (1 over the legal limit) and can not have more and done of mine are declawed but as much as I hate declawing I did it and they are now almost 3 years old and have a good indoor only home and are ALIVE through front clawless.
Can see all our babies at: http://members.aol.com/larrystark/
RichC - 29 Jul 2005 12:19 GMT "whayface" <whayface7540722@yahoo.junk.com> wrote in message > Let me say that I have 4 (1 over the legal limit) and can not have more and done of mine
> .........as I hate declawing I did it and they are now almost 3 years old > and have a good indoor only home and are ALIVE through front clawless. > > Can see all our babies at: > http://members.aol.com/larrystark/ I agree with your thinking but why do you have a web page that has "DON'T DECLAW YOUR CAT" on it?
whayface - 29 Jul 2005 15:00 GMT >> .........as I hate declawing I did it and they are now almost 3 years old >> and have a good indoor only home and are ALIVE through front clawless. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >I agree with your thinking but why do you have a web page that has "DON'T >DECLAW YOUR CAT" on it? Well because if you read ALL OF MY PREVIOUS POST you would have seen that I prefer no declawing and none of mine are declawed but if it means keeping them alive I would choose declawing over death.
I look at this declawing thing with a little more open mine then some people but would never declaw any of mine. Hopefully whoever gets mine when I am gone being as how I am in my 60s will not chop their toes off but if that is the only way they will take them well ---- :-(
Phil P. - 29 Jul 2005 14:05 GMT > >>The fact remains that the USA is > >>one of the only major developed countries that has not yet outlawed this [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > If it came down to declawing and death Ahh! The old 'death or declaw" ultimatum! Only weak minded and weak spirited people and unethical and greedy vets submit to that form of moral blackmail.
The National Council on Pet Population Study and Policy conducted a three year study involving 1000 shelters nationwide to determine the 10 most common reasons for relinquishing cats to shelters. Scratching was not even on the list! In fact another study published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Association published a study that showed declawing *increases* the risk of relinquishment!
whayface - 28 Jul 2005 21:46 GMT >>The fact remains that the USA is >>one of the only major developed countries that has not yet outlawed this [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Sorry, sometimes declawing is the humane thing to do. I think I will put my 1/2 cent in here also.
If it came down to declawing and death I wonder what these bleeding heart anti-declawers would choose ?!?!?! I found two strays and my ex said she would take them if they were declawed. Well I called the county shelter and the Humane Society. The shelter said they would keep them 3 days and the Humane Society said they had no room and to take them to the county shelter. I ran an ad in paper almost a week with no callers. All the people I knew had enough cats and wanted no more or were anti cat!! So it was death, declaw or leave on the streets and where they were both only about 8 weeks I figured their chances would not be too good for survival.
Let me say that I have 4 (1 over the legal limit) and can not have more and done of mine are declawed but as much as I hate declawing I did it and they are now almost 3 years old and have a good indoor only home and are ALIVE through front clawless.
Can see all our babies at: http://members.aol.com/larrystark/
todd@copelandhome.net - 28 Jul 2005 17:16 GMT It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only difference.
A first line of defense against what? A couch? Many people, including myself, do not allow our cats outside. There are just too many dead cats on the side of the road and wild cats around here for me to be comfortable with it. So their claws are useless to them. I'm not saying de-clawing it right (I would not do it to my cats) but to someone who cares about their car and their $2000 in furniture. I can see their argument.
Phil P. - 29 Jul 2005 14:03 GMT > It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only > difference. Hardly. Declawing ("onychectomy") does not benefit the cat *in any way*. Its a surgery that's performed solely for the convenience of owners who are to inept, lazy or indifferent to train their cats where to scratch. Declawing actually involves *10* separate amputations of the third phalanges up to and including the *joint*. Amputation without medical benefit is *mayhem*- in anyone's language. Surgery without medical benefit is *mutilation*.
Neutering, on the other hand, prevents testicular, ovarian, uterine, and mammary cancers; eliminates the stress and discomfort of repeated heats in females and stress in males. Neutered cats live less stressful lives- and stress leads to a myriad of physical and emotional problems.
As far as behavior: neutered males are much more hygienic, are much friendlier to other cats, tolerate handling better, give more affection, are more playful and demand more attention than intact males. Neutered females are a little more playful, are friendlier to other household cats and tolerate handling better than intact females.
Thus, neutering benefits the cat and the owner; declawing benefits only the owner.
> A first line of defense against what? A couch? Many people, including > myself, do not allow our cats outside. There are just too many dead [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > cares about their car and their $2000 in furniture. I can see their > argument. A very shallow, self-centered argument. Cat's use their claws for much more than defense. A cat's claws are used for balance, for exercising, and for stretching the muscles in their legs, back, shoulders, and paws. They stretch these muscles by digging their claws into a surface and pulling back against their own clawhold - similar to isometric exercising for humans. This is the only way a cat can exercise, stretch and tone the muscles of its back and shoulders. Ever wonder why a cat arches her back when she digs into a scratching post and pulls back, or are you normally not that inquisitive?
http://www.maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
http://www.maxshouse.com/understanding_scratching.htm
223rem - 01 Aug 2005 00:09 GMT > It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only > difference. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > cats on the side of the road and wild cats around here for me to be > comfortable with it. Cats are happier if they're allowed outside. But you dont care abot how your cats feel, you only care about how *you* feel, apparently.
> de-clawing it right (I would not do it to my cats) but to someone who > cares about their car and their $2000 in furniture. I can see their > argument. These people are scum. Lower than cockroaches.
shortfuse - 01 Aug 2005 00:21 GMT (I guess you should know about cockroaches)
>> It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only >> difference. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > These people are scum. Lower than cockroaches. Kalyahna - 01 Aug 2005 00:42 GMT > > It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only > > difference. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Cats are happier if they're allowed outside. But you dont care abot how > your cats feel, you only care about how *you* feel, apparently. I've known quite a few cats that couldn't give the proverbial rat's a.s about going outside. In the US, there are more laws passed daily requiring animals be kept under control. It's illegal within my entire county (iirc) to allow my cats outside unless they're on a harness and the other end of the leash is in my hand. I see too many cats coming in to the shelter with bite wounds or broken bones or botflies or abcesses or coming up positive for FIV/FeLV, or suffering from something they got into to think it's okay for cats to wander around the streets here. One of my cats likes to look out the door when I open it. The rest of them seem quite content with the windows and their cat trees and their human mom.
Barrnabas Collins - 01 Aug 2005 17:49 GMT >Cats are happier if they're allowed outside Debateable. My cats are indoor cats, they are terrified to go out side. So it depends on how they are raised.
Around here too many outdoor cats end up as roadkill.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
223rem - 01 Aug 2005 18:57 GMT >>Cats are happier if they're allowed outside > > Debateable. My cats are indoor cats, they are terrified to go out > side. So it depends on how they are raised. Right. When they were very young, my kittens were terrified too. Now they come running to the front door when I yell 'Want to go OUT?'. Very funny. If it was up to them, they'd only be inside to eat and sleep.
It is clear to me that a cat that goes out to run around and explore, climb trees, chase rabbits and mice, interact with other cats, is mentally healthier than a cat confined indoors.
L Sternn - 02 Aug 2005 05:21 GMT >>>Cats are happier if they're allowed outside >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >It is clear to me that a cat that goes out to run around and explore, There's not much around here to explore except vast expanses of asphalt, barren vacant lots where construction is about to start, a 4 lane highway with speed limit of 40 mph (traffic regularly hits 60), an 8 lane freeway with a 65 mph speed limit (traffic regularly hits 80), some cacti, 115 degree temperatures, the occasional coyote, scorpion, rattler, brown recluse or hive of africanized bees.
And let's not forget a.sholes with pellet guns - she had been shot when I found her.
There's also a.sholes with serious firearms out here. 5 horses have been shot around here in the past month or so, 3 have died.
>climb trees, Not many trees to climb around here unless you count saguaros.
>chase rabbits Not many rabbits either
>and mice, haven't seen any of those
>interact with other cats, In 2 years that I've lived here, I've only seen 2 cats outdoors that weren't dead (not counting mine, which surely would have died had I not taken her in).
>is mentally healthier than a cat confined indoors. Call me crazy, but I prefer still breathing over mentally healthier.
223rem - 02 Aug 2005 05:57 GMT I think you should move. How about the Midwest?
L Sternn - 02 Aug 2005 07:19 GMT >I think you should move. How about the Midwest? Like where? Iowa? Too many meth labs for my taste.
Kalyahna - 02 Aug 2005 17:17 GMT > I think you should move. How about the Midwest? What difference does that make? More trees, grass, rabbits, and mice don't change the threats of an animal being outside, nevermind the growing number of communities that have laws against owners letting their cats wander as they will.
The Chief Instigator - 03 Aug 2005 10:05 GMT >> I think you should move. How about the Midwest?
>What difference does that make? More trees, grass, rabbits, and mice don't >change the threats of an animal being outside, nevermind the growing number >of communities that have laws against owners letting their cats wander as >they will. Indeed...and as the spouse of a South Dakota farmer's daughter, who knows well the folly of trying to herd cats on a farm, I have to wonder about the thought processes of city councils trying to corral cats, at times.
 Signature Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros) LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26) NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
The Chief Instigator - 03 Aug 2005 08:42 GMT >>Cats are happier if they're allowed outside
>Debateable. My cats are indoor cats, they are terrified to go out >side. So it depends on how they are raised. True...our two were both indoors, and both got out - once, at different times - back when we were still coming up to our wedding. Both of them were out a few minutes at most before they were back at the front door whining to be let in. (Houston in July isn't easy on much of anything, save the occasional mosquito.)
>Around here too many outdoor cats end up as roadkill. Same here, sadly...but none around our immediate neighborhood in almost two years, for some reason. Maybe more of them are staying indoors.
 Signature Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros) LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26) NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
Barrnabas Collins - 03 Aug 2005 18:41 GMT >True...our two were both indoors, and both got out - once, at different times >- back when we were still coming up to our wedding. Both of them were out a >few minutes at most before they were back at the front door whining to be let >in. (Houston in July isn't easy on much of anything, save the occasional >mosquito.) Around here we have the a sure cure for keeping cats from wanting to go outside.....IT'S BELOW FREEZING FOR MORE THAN HALF THE YEAR. OH, AND IT SNOWS TOO. Alot of the year the snow is higher than the cat.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
The Chief Instigator - 04 Aug 2005 05:45 GMT >>True...our two were both indoors, and both got out - once, at different times >>- back when we were still coming up to our wedding. Both of them were out a >>few minutes at most before they were back at the front door whining to be let >>in. (Houston in July isn't easy on much of anything, save the occasional >>mosquito.)
>Around here we have the a sure cure for keeping cats from wanting to >go outside.....IT'S BELOW FREEZING FOR MORE THAN HALF THE YEAR. >OH, AND IT SNOWS TOO. Alot of the year the snow is higher than >the cat. That's what you get for living somewhere that has seasons. ;-)
 Signature Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros) LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26) NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
Barrnabas Collins - 04 Aug 2005 16:28 GMT >>Around here we have the a sure cure for keeping cats from wanting to >>go outside.....IT'S BELOW FREEZING FOR MORE THAN HALF THE YEAR. >>OH, AND IT SNOWS TOO. Alot of the year the snow is higher than >>the cat. > >That's what you get for living somewhere that has seasons. ;-) Hey it's better than Florida which has hurricanes, California which has mudslides, Texas which has droughts, or Miinnesota/Wisconsin/Michigan which get even more snow than we do sometimes.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
L Sternn - 04 Aug 2005 20:53 GMT >>>Around here we have the a sure cure for keeping cats from wanting to >>>go outside.....IT'S BELOW FREEZING FOR MORE THAN HALF THE YEAR. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Miinnesota/Wisconsin/Michigan which get even more snow than we >do sometimes. That's a matter of opinion. I'd much rather live in Texas or Florida than any place that has snow.
BTW, Texas sometimes gets hurricanes too.
The big problem with TX or FL is the humidity.
I live in AZ now which has no humidity, no hurricanes, no snow (at least the part I live in), and even though I think we're still in a drought (7 years, so I'm told), I don't see how you could tell - it's a bloody desert!
Barrnabas Collins - 05 Aug 2005 00:06 GMT 0On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:53:52 -0700, L Sternn <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote:
>That's a matter of opinion. I'd much rather live in Texas or Florida >than any place that has snow. I'm not a big fan of snow, but four hurricanes last year convinvce my I don't want to live in Florida, 100+ tempertatures convinced me I don't want to live in Texas, California, Arizona.
>BTW, Texas sometimes gets hurricanes too. Like earlier this summer.
>The big problem with TX or FL is the humidity. Heat + Dew Point > 75 = unbearably hot.
>I live in AZ now which has no humidity, no hurricanes, no snow (at >least the part I live in), and even though I think we're still in a >drought (7 years, so I'm told), I don't see how you could tell - it's >a bloody desert! And temperatures above 100.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
L Sternn - 05 Aug 2005 01:29 GMT >0On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:53:52 -0700, L Sternn <lincolnfs@hm.net> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >>a bloody desert! >And temperatures above 100. The high today was 99. It's been a very cool week. The low the other day was actually in the 70s (79 counts!).
It's certainly subjective, but it doesn't really bother me until it hits 110 - which it has already this year and will again. It doesn't get really bad IMO 'til it hits 115.
The high this weekend is supposed to be 105 - I plan on doing some hiking. It should be great. You just have to make sure you bring water.
>------------------------------------------ > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups >----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- rpl - 05 Aug 2005 01:33 GMT yeah me 2...
rpl canada oh wait you mean F ? I thought you meant K
>>0On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:53:52 -0700, L Sternn <lincolnfs@hm.net> >>wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups >>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- L Sternn - 05 Aug 2005 02:00 GMT >yeah me 2... > >rpl >canada >oh wait you mean F ? I thought you meant K Eh?
It starts to bother you when the temperature hits 110 K?
That's -163 Celsius or -261 Fahrenheit.
Barrnabas Collins - 05 Aug 2005 14:28 GMT >yeah me 2... > >rpl >canada >oh wait you mean F ? I thought you meant K
>> The high this weekend is supposed to be 105 - I plan on doing some >> hiking. It should be great. You just have to make sure you bring >> water. Fahrenheit. 110 degrees Fahrenheit = 316.4833333 kelvin.
The dew point measuers the humidity in the air. > 63 starts to get uncomfortable, > 68 gets very uncomfortable, > 70 is oppresive, > 75 is very oppresive.
I prefer dew point for measuring the humidity rathar than relative humidity.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
L Sternn - 03 Aug 2005 20:31 GMT >>>Cats are happier if they're allowed outside > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >in. (Houston in July isn't easy on much of anything, save the occasional >mosquito.) The roaches love it too.
>>Around here too many outdoor cats end up as roadkill. > >Same here, sadly...but none around our immediate neighborhood in almost two >years, for some reason. Maybe more of them are staying indoors. The Chief Instigator - 04 Aug 2005 04:33 GMT >>>>Cats are happier if they're allowed outside
>>>Debateable. My cats are indoor cats, they are terrified to go out >>>side. So it depends on how they are raised.
>>True...our two were both indoors, and both got out - once, at different times >>- back when we were still coming up to our wedding. Both of them were out a >>few minutes at most before they were back at the front door whining to be let >>in. (Houston in July isn't easy on much of anything, save the occasional >>mosquito.)
>The roaches love it too. True...and our Bombay didn't hesitate to eat one if he saw it (and could catch it). The other cat, a DSH, would just sit and look...but he'd meow to warn us about the occasional crane fly in the apartment.
 Signature Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros) LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26) NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
L Sternn - 02 Aug 2005 05:04 GMT >It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only >difference. It's not the same. In fact, humans often willingly undergo surgery to accomplish the same thing.
I don't know of anyone who willingly loses parts of their fingers.
>A first line of defense against what? A couch? Against gravity for one thing. Also against the toy they might be playing with, the cricket that snuck into your bedroom and will keep you up at nite if your cat can't take it out.
>Many people, including >myself, do not allow our cats outside. Mine is an indoor cat too, with claws. I believe she would miss them if they were taken away.
She really seems to enjoy scratching, and occasionally it seems she takes out her frustrations on the scratching posts.
> There are just too many dead >cats on the side of the road and wild cats around here for me to be >comfortable with it. So their claws are useless to them. They're definitely not useless indoors.
>I'm not saying >de-clawing it right (I would not do it to my cats) but to someone who >cares about their car and their $2000 in furniture. I can see their >argument. I care about my furniture too, but it isn't going to last forever and I believe they can be trained to scratch only what is allowed nearly all the time. Mine seems to be trained that way, although maybe she's just being nice (almost all the time).
Walsingham - 27 Sep 2005 14:40 GMT > It's not the same? It's a different part of the cat, that is the only > difference. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > cares about their car and their $2000 in furniture. I can see their > argument. I came to ask advice,,but un/fortunately read this post. If you think more of your 4 wheel toys and your bits of wood and plastic or whatever then like the man said "get a ********** goldfish". On almost immediate second thoughts; get a vet to remove your fingernails, you don`t need `em. The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider removing a cats claws for other than a severe medical reason is nauseatingly bizarre.
Another puzzle is where do you get the cats that attack your furniture and your car?? I have been fortunate to have had feline family members (not `pets`, IOW, `property`)since I was a child and the only time that I can recall any of them clawing anything inside the house, was when this particular cat was on R&R from an injury...and was bored sh**less. So maybe the clue is to _take_ your cat outside for a short time, whilst you wait for something to happen on, `Dorks of Our Lives` or `The Bald an thu Braindead`. Strewth! Maybe stop trying to impress other `people` with your furniture or your cars and get a life.
Our little cat at the moment is extremely ill and in spite of our efforts, we are having to prepare ourselves for him going, so to read of oinks who consider artifacts over life makes us extremely angry.
TPC
 Signature "Man is the best computer we can put aboard a spacecraft ... the only one that can be mass-produced with unskilled labor." - Werner von Braun -
Kiran - 27 Sep 2005 19:42 GMT : The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider removing a cats : claws for other than a severe medical reason is nauseatingly bizarre. To keep perspective, many of these individuals could be plain iognorant, but they are always (mis)guided and assisted by greedy vets who should know better.
I would begin with organized efforts to pass legislation that penalizes such mutilating vets.
Ivor Jones - 27 Sep 2005 23:06 GMT > > The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider > > removing a cats claws for other than a severe medical [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I would begin with organized efforts to pass legislation > that penalizes such mutilating vets. Or just make it illegal outright, as happens in virtually all other "civilised" countries worldwide.
It is unthinkable here in the UK.
Ivor
shortfuse - 28 Sep 2005 00:44 GMT Please..I know I will get blasted for this...but let's not start this again! Yes...We all know the pros and conss of declawing cats...
>> > The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider >> > removing a cats claws for other than a severe medical [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Ivor Dr.Carla,DVM - 28 Sep 2005 00:52 GMT I must re-iterate what I said earlier. Although I personally don't like to declaw a cat, a live, loved, cared for, declawed cat in a home, is better than a dead cat. I have heard stories of people putting a cat in a bag and running it over in the car for ruining the furniture. Gross, yes, despicable, deplorable, disgusting, inexcusable and illegal, yes. But it happens. Sad. On a similar note, I was personally told by a man that when his cat goes into heat, he puts her outside with extra food bowl for the males, so they will come around and service her, so she will "shut-up". Then when the kittens are born, he just drowns them. And this was at a free clinic set up in his town, where we came in with the Humane Society to provide basic vet care and spay/neuter pets for free. I tried to convince him to bring her in, but I never saw him again. So please, don't judge people. They come here for help and we don't give them constructive advise, like humane alternatives to declawing, they won't come in at all, and that may be one less person who hears about training a cat to use a scratching post or buying those claw covers.
> Please..I know I will get blasted for this...but let's not start this > again! [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> >> Ivor shortfuse - 28 Sep 2005 00:55 GMT I agree with you Dr Carla...
>I must re-iterate what I said earlier. > Although I personally don't like to declaw a cat, a live, loved, cared [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >>> >>> Ivor No More Retail - 28 Sep 2005 01:07 GMT Sometime you just want to take this people out and do the same to them but Ohh no Certain groups won't lets us Eye for an Eye
Phil P. - 28 Sep 2005 10:59 GMT > I agree with you Dr Carla... Of course you do! Because you're too lazy and/or inept to teach your cat where to scratch. "Dr. Carla" simply patted your head with ethically inappropriate moral blackmail to make you feel better about being inept.
Phil P. - 28 Sep 2005 10:48 GMT > I must re-iterate what I said earlier. > Although I personally don't like to declaw a cat, Yeah-- but you force yourself to do it because declawing sure helps to pay off those student loans and BMW, eh, Doc? Its also a lot more profitable than educating your clients about how to train a cat where to scratch. I'd bet you don't even show your clients how to trim a cat's claw because you rather charge $5 or $10 to do it for them-- that's on top of the $40-$50 for the office visit and an half-a.s physical exam.
a live, loved, cared for,
> declawed cat in a home, is better than a dead cat. Yup. That's the standard veterinary justification for declawing. Its called a self-reinforcing delusion that helps soothe the conscience on the way to the bank.
> I have heard stories of people putting a cat in a bag and running it over in > the car for ruining the furniture. Psychopaths also kill babies for crying. Should ventriculocordectomies be preformed on babies just in case one or both of their parents are psychopaths?
I can easily refute your argument because its ethically inappropriate to subject a cat to anesthetic and surgical risks and multiple amputations that cause the cat extreme pain and deprive the cat of an essential body part merely to fit an owner's lifestyle, aesthetics, or convenience without providing any physical or mental benefit for the cat. You do realize that amputation and depriving a cat of a body part for no physical or mental benefit is mayhem- or didn't they teach you that in vet school?
Its also ethically inappropriate for veterinarians to submit to moral blackmail from their clients. Do you think all the millions of people with cats in countries where declawing is either illegal or considered unethical for non-medical reasons put their cats in paper bags and run them over for scratching furniture-- or live in shredded homes covered with festering scratch wounds???
The UK, for example, has a higher density of cats per capita than the US- yet their kill rate is proportionately substantially less.
If you really oppose declawing, why don't you take this opportunity to educate people why they should not declaw cats and how to train cats where to scratch instead of justifying declawing with unethical moral blackmail?
Dr.Carla,DVM - 29 Sep 2005 01:23 GMT Vets where I live make $35,000 to $60,000 a year (gross, not net). And, I drive a 1992 Cavalier and my husband who works for a computer leasing company makes more money than me and drives a 2000 Buick Don't even assume you know me. Although I realize some people have to put others down to make themselves feel better. I suggest if you are going to reply to a post, you should take the time to read it first.
"Dr.Carla,DVM" <Dr.Carla@insightbb.com> wrote
> So please, don't judge people. They come here for help and we don't give > them constructive advise, like humane alternatives to declawing, they > won't > come in at all, and that may be one less person who hears about training a > cat to use a scratching post or buying those claw covers. Phil P. - 29 Sep 2005 05:59 GMT > Vets where I live make $35,000 to $60,000 a year (gross, not net). > And, I drive a 1992 Cavalier and my husband who works for a computer leasing [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I suggest if you are going to reply to a post, you should take the time to > read it first. I don't believe you're even a vet. I've worked with enough vets for > 45 years to know the real thing when I see it and you're a long way from it. If by some remote chance you are a vet- you must be a large animal vet because you sure don't know much about cats.
No More Retail - 29 Sep 2005 06:58 GMT In defense of some vets the vets schools now only do a general overview most are specializing in either dog or cats exotic or agriculture at least here in Florida is what I have been told, My vet only works on cats he does take in stray dogs and other animals and gives them a good home where he can find it.
Oh by the way not to start a flame war but he does not make a lot of money he does a lot of low cost vet work Luckily he has money and he uses his profits to find stray animals good homes. Personally know this he has the same tax accountant
PS He only does declawing if medical necessary. I have seen a declawing procedure when the cat under sedation cried out I lost my lunch in the garbage can. If the person can't keep the cat because of scratching he finds a good home for them. I almost had to have rumble declawed cause the epilepsy was causing him to scratch his skin off leaving a bloody mess.
Personally if that guy told me he drown kittens like you said I would have tracked his happy butt down specially a small town well I won't say what would have happened
Dr.Carla,DVM - 30 Sep 2005 08:11 GMT > I don't believe you're even a vet. I am, and I'm done with this conversation.
Phil P. - 30 Sep 2005 09:17 GMT > > I don't believe you're even a vet. > I am, If you are- which I seriously doubt- I'm glad you're not my vet!
>and I'm done with this conversation. Smart move.
You might want to "brush up" on the anatomy of a cat's claw so you won't get stumped and can't answer the next time someone asks you-- that didn't do much for your credibility. I'd be happy to tutor you for a reasonable fee.
KD - 29 Sep 2005 11:30 GMT >> I must re-iterate what I said earlier. >> Although I personally don't like to declaw a cat, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >rather charge $5 or $10 to do it for them-- that's on top of the $40-$50 for >the office visit and an half-a.s physical exam. I cannot understand why anyone would mutilate a cat in this way.
The Cunning Linguist :Þ - 29 Sep 2005 13:40 GMT > > I must re-iterate what I said earlier. > > Although I personally don't like to declaw a cat, [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > educate people why they should not declaw cats and how to train cats where > to scratch instead of justifying declawing with unethical moral blackmail? Did a vet, like, sexually abuse you or something?
Ivor Jones - 28 Sep 2005 10:55 GMT > Please..I know I will get blasted for this...but let's > not start this again! Yes...We all know the pros and > conss of declawing cats... Pros..? There *are* no pros.
Ivor
-- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
shortfuse - 28 Sep 2005 13:10 GMT As in the words of another....Plonk!
 Signature Barbara Polans Independent Mary Kay Consultant 740-773-9878 May the Lord Bless you and keep you and cause His face to Shine Upon you
>> Please..I know I will get blasted for this...but let's >> not start this again! Yes...We all know the pros and [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? The Cunning Linguist :Þ - 29 Sep 2005 13:40 GMT > As in the words of another....Plonk! You work for the cosmetic (animal abuse) industry and you are an intolerant xian Could you plonk me, too? Thanks
shortfuse - 29 Sep 2005 13:59 GMT  Signature You better brush up on your research regarding MK company, Buster...And yes, you will be in my killfile..NOW.
>> As in the words of another....Plonk! > > You work for the cosmetic (animal abuse) industry and you are an > intolerant > xian > Could you plonk me, too? Thanks The Cunning Linguist :Þ - 30 Sep 2005 14:14 GMT Doesn't matter. The industry abuses animals and you support the industry
>Buster That would be Mr. Buster to you, top poster
> ...And yes, you will be in my killfile..NOW. Thank ya, lawd, thank ya!
> >> As in the words of another....Plonk! > > > > You work for the cosmetic (animal abuse) industry and you are an > > intolerant > > xian > > Could you plonk me, too? Thanks alt4 - 30 Sep 2005 14:35 GMT You know, its a good thing I am not your neighbor..Some rude people we have on here...Sounds like we're living in a communist community here...No one can have their views on anything...whether it's considered wrong or not.
Phil P. - 30 Sep 2005 15:12 GMT > You know, its a good thing I am not your neighbor.. ..a good thing for you.
Some rude people we have
> on here...Sounds like we're living in a communist community here... Sounds like you're a closet declaw proponent. They're usually the only ones who whine and complain about other peoples' manners in these types of threads because all the criticism applies to them, too. They don't want anyone challenging their right to maim cats.
I think you need to reevaluate your priorities and worry less about other peoples' manners and more about animal mayhem.
No one
> can have their views on anything...whether it's considered wrong or not. Naaa, I think you'll find animal abuse is pretty much unacceptable in just about the entire civilized world- except North America where the dollar rules and animals drool. Declaw a cat in most European countries and you'll find your self-righteous, sanctimonious a.s in jail- along with your vet's.
alt4 - 30 Sep 2005 15:46 GMT Well, I dont give a rat's a.s what you think...which is how you think... A troll just wants to see his name on the from line. Like Dr Carla no more comments will be made on this subject from me.... .HURRAY! you say? :p
>> You know, its a good thing I am not your neighbor.. > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > find your self-righteous, sanctimonious a.s in jail- along with your > vet's. Phil P. - 30 Sep 2005 16:10 GMT > Well, I dont give a rat's a.s what you think...which is how you think... > A troll just wants to see his name on the from line. Yep- I'm a troll alright. Nothing gets past your lightening quick perception. I'd bet everyone who thinks you're self-righteous and sanctimonious is a troll, too.
> Like Dr Carla no more comments will be made on this subject from me.... > .HURRAY! you say? :p Seems like I hit a nerve. I must have made the right call- you are a closet declaw proponent. LOL!
> >> You know, its a good thing I am not your neighbor.. > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > find your self-righteous, sanctimonious a.s in jail- along with your > > vet's. The Cunning Linguist :Þ - 29 Sep 2005 13:40 GMT > Please..I know I will get blasted for this...but let's not start this again! > Yes...We all know the pros and conss of declawing cats... There are no "pros" when it comes to mutilating animals
Jason James - 28 Sep 2005 08:40 GMT > > > The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider > > > removing a cats claws for other than a severe medical [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Ivor The only time I have heard of it here was with greyhound owners who criminally declawed cats to throw in with the dogs to 'blood' them. These people get up to 3 yrs jail for such gross acts if caught.
Jason
Anthropy - 11 Oct 2005 20:27 GMT >> > > The idea that a non-psychopathic adult could consider >> > > removing a cats claws for other than a severe medical [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Jason There is no humane excuse for declawing a cat. As was written earlier in the thread if you value your furniture so much get an animal without claws. No doubt the same people also keep birds in cages or failing that they clip their wings. Our cats at first began clawing so we bought a post with thick rope tied around it. Whenever the cats scratched anything they were picked up (not admonished) and taken to the post, eventually they began using it and now they use nothing else...well almost. I feel sympathy for the OP because its obvious they loved the cat and loss is loss however when taking on an animal you cannot expect to tailor it to fit your needs. Don't forget the animal had no choice and is under no obligation, natural or otherwise to live with you, especially a cat. As the old saying goes dogs have masters, cats have staff.
Barrnabas Collins - 28 Jul 2005 17:17 GMT >In what US states is de-clawing illegal. Please provide the names to >back up this claim. I believe there is at least one city in Calfornia that has made it illegal.
>Question, is cutting out the genitals of a cat any less cruel? There >certainly are less extreme measures to prevent cats from breeding but >most people recommend cutting away the organs of the cat instead. Are >your cats spayed/neutered? I'm not against it, I just understand that >each person has their own views on the subject. Except for one problem:
http://www.1-800-save-a-pet.com/public/spay_and_neuter/
Yes spaying/neutering a cat may be cruel, but putting a cat to sleep because it is homeless is even more cruel.
Do some research. Look particularly at how many homeless cats are put to sleep each year.
As the commercial goes in Perfect no cats would be spayed/neutered. every cat would find a good home, and there would be no homeless cats.
Unfortunetly we don't live in Perfect. ------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
shortfuse - 28 Jul 2005 19:42 GMT > Yes spaying/neutering a cat may be cruel, but putting a cat to > sleep because it is homeless is even more cruel. Yes..tell me about putting homeless cats to sleep! I took in a stray this past late winter, he had hurt his paw. Took him to the vet to get his paw checked out. He ended up staying behind and being put to sleep due to being inflicted with Leukemia. Nearly broke my heart! I also feed about 3-4 homeless cats (2 were deserted by their owners based on fact).
>> ------------------------------------------ > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption > =---- M.C. Mullen - 28 Jul 2005 22:53 GMT : http://www.1-800-save-a-pet.com/public/spay_and_neuter/ : [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : Do some research. Look particularly at how many homeless : cats are put to sleep each year. How can neutering be cruel? *Not* to neuter a cat is cruel! - Also to the owner who has to put up with spraying, meowing, looking for cats that have wandered away, treating wounds from cat fights, looking for homes for unwanted kittens etc.
Carola
Phil P. - 29 Jul 2005 14:04 GMT > > er.. declawing is illegal in many countries (and many USA states), it's not > > a case of what you believe. Look down at your hands and imagine having your [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > This person is pushing his merchandise on this site and this should be > considered along with his opinion. Here's a site that opposes declawing that has nothing to sell- and is backed up by clinical studies.
http://www.maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
http://www.maxshouse.com/understanding_scratching.htm
> Question, is cutting out the genitals of a cat any less cruel? There > certainly are less extreme measures to prevent cats from breeding Hormone treatment, and tubal ligation-vasectomy do not prevent mammary, ovarian, uterine, and testicle cancers. These cancers can only be prevented by neutering and spaying. Non-surgical sterilization also does not eliminate estrous cycles in females or urine marking and aggression in males.
but
> most people recommend cutting away the organs of the cat instead. ...because neutering benefits the cat and the owner and the general feline population as a species.
Are
> your cats spayed/neutered? I'm not against it, I just understand that > each person has their own views on the subject. There are no other views- only excuses. Its ethically and morally inappropriate to declaw a cat and causing the cat pain, and depriving the cat of the enjoyment and physical and emotional need to scratch merely to fit the owner's lifestyle aesthetics, or convenience.
How do all the millions of people around the world who live in countries where declawing is either illegal or not performed manage to live in harmony with their fully clawed cats? Or do you think they live in shredded homes and are covered with festering sores from cat scratches???
If a person can't train a cat where to scratch- they're not suited to have a cat.
John - 29 Jul 2005 23:33 GMT I have a lot of sympathy for Matt the original poster. Sorry about your loss matey! :( It sucks big time.
Neil - Your comments in your reply were out of order. You need to be respectful when someone has lost a pet they obviously cared about a lot, despite your personal views on de-clawing. I completely agree with you on de-clawing by the way, but your response was harsh and unnecessary.
On what Matt has told us in his original post, it appears that everything went smoothly until they tried to revive the cat. Putting aside your personal opinion of cats being de-clawed, to me it would seem that the actual de-clawing part of the operation was not the reason why the cat passed away. A lot of operations with cats are successful, however there is always an element of risk involved and sometimes unfortunately it may not be possible to revive a cat. Perhaps this has more to do with the injection used to revive them. It may be difficult to determine the precise dose needed for different cats. Unfortunately this is just one of those things. A lot of cats are killed in the road by cars, and that is pretty horrific and messy. If there is any consolation from this, then at the very least it was painless and he passed over peacefully. Not much consolation I know when you have lost a pet you loved.
Pookie - I agree you need to have a heart when someone has lost a pet they loved. I am personally against de-clawing and would advise everyone who keeps or intends to keep a cat against it. On the subject of circumcision, I would personally say that this also is mutilation. I wouldn't go around telling Moms who have done that to their sons that it is wrong though whether that is for religious reasons or whatever. I wonder what would happen though if boys were given the options of choosing for themselves whether they are circumcised or not when they turn 18 or 21, as opposed to not having any say in the matter? I wonder which option most would choose? Of course if you have been circumcised as a baby or young child then it may not make any difference to you today. I do know that there are many who have though, who wish that choice hadn't been made for them.
Getting back on topic...
As I have previously said on the subject of de-clawing and with the deepest respect to Matt, I believe you should 'never' get a cat de-clawed. It doesn't just change the cat physically, but it also affects them mentally and psychologically changes their personality. Even if the operation had been a success, the cat would still have been psychologically damaged. It wouldn't have been the same cat. Cats rely on the claws for survival in the wild. Cats as pets are no different. Whether you let them out at night or in the day, they are then 'in the wild' and need those claws. Without them they would feel a part of themselves missing, a very major and vital part that they rely on. If the cat had been de-clawed it would have felt like an injury to the cat. Cats use their claws to help them climb up trees, cling on to things, hunt, stretch, catch and kill things, and defend themselves from other cats and predators. Without them they are at a huge disadvantage. Even if you are only playing with your cat in the home and he is chasing things, at that point despite being indoors he is in predator mode and is 'in the wild', he needs those claws and teeth to catch that piece of string, toy mouse or feathers you are swaying in the air.
You have to be willing to take a little damage to some of your carpets and furniture if you are going to have a cat as a pet. I wouldn't advise you chose a cat for a pet if you are not prepared for all that it entails. The same goes for Chinchillas and other animals that need to scratch and use their teeth too. We just learned to accept that some or our furniture and carpets are going to 'get it' from the cats claws.
You can train cats though to an extent whereby they know that certain areas are off limits and they are in big trouble if they try to go there.
Ditty - Personally I don't believe de-clawing can ever be the humane thing to do. It is only humane in terms of the owners needs. I fail to see any way in which de-clawing can be humane for a cat; it doesn't benefit the cat in any way, and puts it at a major disadvantage as well as damaging it psychologically. It is something that only benefits the owner.
Whayface - I'm not a bleeding heart anti de-clawer, I do disagree with your viewpoint though. I personally believe that life indoors is not much of a life for a cat. I also believe that a de-clawed cat doesn't enjoy the life or freedom of a normal cat. It puts them at a major disadvantage and can damage them psychologically. Perhaps if de-clawing were done when the cats are very young it wouldn't affect them to the same degree. Nonetheless I still believe the practice to be completely wrong, and something that doesn't benefit the cat in any way, but harms them. It only benefits the humans. A de-clawed cat is not a cat, in my opinion.
Todd - We allow our cat out every day. Roads are dangerous, however they are dangerous for us humans as well as cats. We don't stay confined inside because of this. This is what life is all about. It is about freedom. Vehicles on the road sometimes kill cats and that is unfortunate. I would say a majority of cats though would learn very quickly that roads are dangerous and generally they will stay away from them when they are busy with noisy traffic.
I would rather my cat be able to go outside and enjoy all the benefits and freedom and take the small risk that is involved naturally in "nature" (i.e. laws of natural selection) than for them to be artificially confined to a life indoors were they miss out on a lot of the activities a normal cat, claws included, would engage in.
Once a cat has been de-clawed, it would effectively be cruel to let them venture outside. I don't see the argument to someone who cares about material goods, whether that's a $2000 couch or a $50,000 car, above that of their pet. If they do care about their couch more, then perhaps a cat is not the best choice of pet for them in the first place? You can replace a couch and a car, but you can never replace the same cat. That is my opinion and is where I stand on that.
Phil - Our cat is not neutered. Neutering would prevent any cancer in that part of the body if it were no longer present :) Of course it doesn't mean that 95% of cats would have got any form of cancer anyway had they not been neutered. Our cat is very chilled out. He is asleep half the time. He is also extremely hygienic. He always seems to be paying attending to a certain part of his body with his tongue. It is most amusing especially if you have it on camcorder with commentary :)
Our cat is extremely friendly. He has not been in many fights. In fact another male in the neighbourhood that is half his size, and has more likely than not been neutered bullies him.
Technically, you could say that a cat, which has been neutered, is no longer male or female. It is then asexual.
Does neutering benefit the cat as well as the owner? Does it "really" make that much of a difference? Granted it may be the responsible thing to do, however is it not natural for female cats to be in heat and males to get stressed out now and again? Is this not just what is known as 'nature'? Is it necessary for both sexes to get neutered? After all we are talking about contraception here, albeit permanent contraception. Can a male or female cat get a vasectomy? Is neutering the only option? I haven't really formed much of an opinion yet on neutering.
Carola - Why do you believe it is cruel to "not" neuter a cat? We have never witnessed our cat spraying? Perhaps this is something he might do outside? He certainly doesn't do anything like that inside :) As for Meowing, that is what cats are supposed to do naturally is it not? :) It comes as standard with the purring, scratching et cetera.
Our cat has never wondered away for more than one day at the most. He usually comes back every evening when he is hungry. We often let him come and go as he pleases. As far as cat fights go he has never really been in any! The vet did say she was surprised that he had not been in a few being a male. However our cat sometimes gets bullied by a small black male cat half his size that is more likely than not neutered and is quite aggressive. Our cat, which is pretty big and strong usually just runs away or avoids him altogether! I am actually quite dismayed about that, and the fact he is being bullied. I have been training him a lot to chase things all over our living room. We have never had any major wounds to treat for our cat. Just a slight scratch from another cat, probably the small black aggressive one that is likely neutered.
As for unwanted kittens, I would tend to agree that "contraception for cats" is a responsible thing to do. I don't know whether I would personally include neutering as that form of contraception.
It just didn't happen for our cat. When I use the word "our", it is technically not "my" cat, my sister is the owner, but she moved back home so it has become the family cat now. She was actually going to get him neutered and had pencilled in a date in her diary to do so, however she went through a very difficult and trying time in her life and by the time it came up again, the cat was too old for it, it was already past the stage were it should have really been done. I wouldn't ever change the way he was now though, he is perfect the way he is. I believe he is how a normal British Shorthair, claws included, should be, well, apart from the bit were he doesn't do anything when that little black cat charges for him :)
Phil - (again:) Our cat is fully clawed. Damage to carpets and furniture is minimal or hardly noticeable. Even if there was noticeable damage, you can get it repaired, have a throw over if it's a couch or eventually just by new furniture anyway. There are things you can do to prevent damage. Even training your cat not to claw certain items of furniture is a good method.
Perhaps also, a lot of people posting in here would find that their cats had they been allowed to go outside on a regular basis in the first place, their claws would have been kept worn down by their ventures in the outside world, e.g. climbing up trees, walls, charging to catch prey et cetera.
John
Barrnabas Collins - 30 Jul 2005 00:57 GMT >On the subject >of ccisionircum, I would personally say that this also is mutilation. >I wouldn't go around telling Moms who have done that to their sons >that it is wrong though whether that is for religious reasons or >whatever. On a related note there was a study very recently that those who are circumcised are less apt to get aids. You'll probably see more studies about this in the future.
I would add the reason circumcision is done is for religious reasons.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
M.C. Mullen - 30 Jul 2005 07:37 GMT : >On the subject : >of ccisionircum, I would personally say that this also is mutilation. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] : I would add the reason circumcision is done is for : religious reasons. Plus the person/part operated on still functions, where as the cat's claws are destroyed and don't function properly anymore!
Carola
Barrnabas Collins - 30 Jul 2005 02:39 GMT >, I believe you should 'never' get a cat >de-clawed. I would add, as I found out the hard way, is even if your cats are entirely indoor cats there are times when the cat needs it's claws. A number of years ago I had an old house where a squirrel somehow got into the house.. One of my female cats decided she had to attempt to eradicate this intruder.
She did survive, the squirrrel was removed from the house, but for me it serves as a lesson that you never know when your cat(s) will need those claws.
I would also add you never know when a fire, storm, or other event will force the cat outside where it will need it's claws to defend itself.
Yeah you may say the cat is totally indoors and doesn't need them but what happens if the house is on fire, is hit by a tornado, or some other disaster strikes.
Having the cat defenseless without claws scares me.
------------------------------------------
http://www.barnabascollins.blogspot.com
M.C. Mullen - 30 Jul 2005 07:39 GMT : >, I believe you should 'never' get a cat : >de-clawed. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] : : Having the cat defenseless without claws scares me. It's enough if the cat just slips out by mistake, meets a dog and cannot flee unto the next tree.
Carola
|
|