I beg to differ when you say there is no actual cat fight without blood.
I've had plenty of cats that fought without drawing blood. Screaming,
yowling, and rolling around on the floor until they are separated is a cat
fight to me, with or without blood.
> > I have two cats - a one year old male Siamese (Manzie) and a two year old
> > female DSH (Coco). Manzie isn't neutered (yet) and Coco is fixed. I've had
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Are you sure your cats are actually fighting? If there is
> no blood, that's not a real fight.
rpl - 28 Jun 2005 17:06 GMT
> I beg to differ when you say there is no actual cat fight without blood.
> I've had plenty of cats that fought without drawing blood. Screaming,
> yowling, and rolling around on the floor until they are separated is a cat
> fight to me, with or without blood.
"until they are separated" ?
you often stick your body parts into a blender ?
3 rules vis-a-vis fighting:
a) no fighting when I'm just about to fall asleep
b) no fighting at the end of a TV program I've been watching for the
last couple hours
c) no fighting when at least one cat is in my lap.
pat
>>>I have two cats - a one year old male Siamese (Manzie) and a two year
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>Are you sure your cats are actually fighting? If there is
>>no blood, that's not a real fight.
223rem - 28 Jun 2005 18:25 GMT
> I beg to differ when you say there is no actual cat fight without blood.
> I've had plenty of cats that fought without drawing blood. Screaming,
> yowling, and rolling around on the floor until they are separated is a cat
> fight to me, with or without blood.
I dont think you should interfere in their fights. Fights determine who
is top cat, and if you separate them, they'll fight again until the issue
they have is settled.
Also, dont top post!
wester@laway.net - 28 Jun 2005 23:48 GMT
>> I beg to differ when you say there is no actual cat fight without blood.
>> I've had plenty of cats that fought without drawing blood. Screaming,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Also, dont top post!
Why not top post? So many idiots cannot figure out how to snip?
L Sternn - 29 Jun 2005 00:34 GMT
>>Also, dont top post!
>
>Why not top post?
Because......oh never mind - if you really wanna know, this has been
discussed seemingly endlessly on various newsgroups, if not all
newsgroups.
Just don't top-post. If you wanna know why, use Google to read old
discussions of the issue.
> So many idiots cannot figure out how to snip?
That's true, but a different problem.
patga - 29 Jun 2005 13:02 GMT
I disagree. As I wrote here a few weeks ago I have an aggressive cat that
beats up the other cat. The other cat tries to stay away from the aggressor
but the aggressor stalks him and beats him up every time he gets the chance.
Happened again this morning. I have to keep them separated or the other cat
will be severely injured.
> > I beg to differ when you say there is no actual cat fight without blood.
> > I've had plenty of cats that fought without drawing blood. Screaming,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Also, dont top post!