Cat Forum / General Topics / March 2005
Why do we need designer pets?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Lynn - 17 Mar 2005 01:15 GMT Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian Blue. She has a lead on a breeder and is waiting for her cat to be "made". This infuriates me when there are many wonderful creatures waiting at the local shelter to be adopted. What makes a cat with a pedigree more valuable than any other cat. Shouldn't we focus on providing loving families for the furbabies already in this world rather than bringing more in? The thought that appearance makes one creature more valuable than another outrages me. What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled!
Flippy - 17 Mar 2005 03:01 GMT Good point, Lynn. I don't understand it either. I couldn't love my cats more if they were purebred.
 Signature Flippy in Melbourne, Australia. My Cats: http://www.flippyscatpage.com
> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats > and [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! Mike - 17 Mar 2005 03:37 GMT Hello Lynn via CatKB.com,
You have a point but I would like to point out that various breeds *tend* to exibit specific temperments and character traits. For example, Pursians tend to like quiet lifestyles, Siamese tend to be gregarious and like excitement (these are just two examples). Some breeds (like that hairless one, Devon Rex, and Siamese) are better for people who have alergies.
Yes, in many ways you are right but there are *some* logical reasons to have pedigree cats.
> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree > cats and dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree babies to > decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! DW - 17 Mar 2005 15:30 GMT > You have a point but I would like to point out that various breeds *tend* to exibit specific temperments and character traits. For example, Pursians tend to like quiet lifestyles, Siamese tend to be gregarious and like excitement (these are just two examples). Some breeds (like that hairless one, Devon Rex, and Siamese) are better for people who have alergies. And i've been able to satisfy all my needs by going to the local shelter and let one of the cats choose me.
jacquie0 - 17 Mar 2005 06:14 GMT > Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and > dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian Blue. She has [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! Sorry to disappoint you Lynn, People have been having "pedigree babies" for a while now. It is called invetrofertilization. A single woman can go to a sperm bank, check over the personal records of a donor, decide which one she likes, tells the people which one, gets herself inseminated, and then usually, nine months later......her very own "specialized" baby. Not only that, but, if you are pregnant, and you have an amneosentisis done, and they find something "wrong" with the baby, you have the option of terminating the pregnancy. I guess people like the idea of playing God with innocent lives.
Brad - 17 Mar 2005 09:36 GMT >> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and >> dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian Blue. She has [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree >> babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! No you arent the oddball you are simply looking for a pat on the back thats all. If you have been around here at all you would know that many people here get their cats from shelters and rescues. Are you trying to make those who buy purebreds feel bad? They don't buy them because they have their noses in the air they buy them because they like the "look" of that particular breed and I see nothing wrong with that at all.
Brad
LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE SAFELY IN A WELL-PRESERVED BODY, BUT RATHER TO SKID IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT, SHOUTING... " HOLY @#$%... WHAT A RIDE!"
MaryL - 17 Mar 2005 17:05 GMT >>> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats >>> and [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Brad If the "look" of a particular breed (or even the "temperament") is what is wanted, all the potential adopter needs to do is to visit a local shelter or look at www.petfinder.com. It is virtually impossible to tell many of those cats from purebreds. For that matter, there are rescue groups for almost every breed, and they actively seek people to adopt.
MaryL
DW - 17 Mar 2005 15:36 GMT > Sorry to disappoint you Lynn, People have been having "pedigree babies" > for a while now. It is called invetrofertilization. A single woman can [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > baby, you have the option of terminating the pregnancy. I guess people > like the idea of playing God with innocent lives. I would point sometimes the decision is done for good reason. Sometimes these babies that have something wrong need many millions of dollars for medical care.
As Barney Frank said "For republicans life begins at conception and ends at birth."
Timo Haukioja - 17 Mar 2005 10:45 GMT : Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and : dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian Blue. She has : a lead on a breeder and is waiting for her cat to be "made". This : infuriates me when there are many wonderful creatures waiting at the local : shelter to be adopted. What makes a cat with a pedigree more valuable than : any other cat. What makes a Cornish Rex more valuable to me is the fact that it appears that I can live with it, despite my allergy. All other cat types I've come into contact with me give me a runny nose and itchy eyes. If things were otherwise, I'm sure my wife would have talked me into taking more than one rescued cat from the local shelter a long time ago.
Of course, we don't really NEED a cat at all. Few people do. Our apartment has no rodent problems. In fact, we've been married for over 12 years without ever owning a cat. Dogs are only marginally more useful than cats for most people; nobody around here needs a dog for herding, and very, very few people hunt (and those who do, do it for leisure). Some people want a dog for protection, but the dogs I see daily when I walk home from work are about the same size or smaller than a large cat. I'm also willing to bet a modest sum of money that most of those dogs would be shredded to bits by a 25-pound Maine Coon whose claws are the way they should be.
- Timo
DW - 17 Mar 2005 15:29 GMT > Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and > dogs? I've never understood it either. When ever I get cats I get them at the local shelter. The cats may not have a pedigree but they ares still just as loving.
> Shouldn't we focus on providing loving families for the > furbabies already in this world rather than bringing more in? There is what 19 million cats put to sleep each year because there aren't enough homes?
> The thought > that appearance makes one creature more valuable than another outrages me. It outrages me too.
> What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! Too late it's already being done.
Justin L - 17 Mar 2005 16:05 GMT <snip>
>There is what 19 million cats put to sleep each year because there >aren't enough homes? That figure should be 3 - 4 million cats and dogs are euthanized per year.
source : http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/pet_overpopulation_and_owners hip_statistics/hsus_pet_overpopulation_estimates.html
Justin <snip>
MaryL - 17 Mar 2005 17:21 GMT > <snip> >>There is what 19 million cats put to sleep each year because there [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Justin > <snip> Various groups cite widely divergent estimates concerning the number of pets that are euthanized each year. Even the Humane Society itself gives different citations (depending on the person being quoted). Based on my experience with our local animal shelter, I am very dubious about the figures quoted in the source you cited. Kill shelters almost *always* are forced to euthanize substantially more animals than they are able to adopt out. This source (Great Lakes Radio Consortium -- which I admit I am not familiar with) estimates that 6 million cats and dogs are euthanized each year: http://tinyurl.com/6b262. Here is another link that refers to 6 million per year: This source (Department of Agriculture) estimates 4 million cats per year and half that number for dogs: http://tinyurl.com/5dh5j. And this source (also quoting a HSUS representative) estimates a euthanasia rate of 8 million cats and dogs per year: http://tinyurl.com/6xxba. Countless other sites are available, most quoting higher figures than the site you listed.
MaryL
Justin L - 17 Mar 2005 19:49 GMT >> <snip> >>>There is what 19 million cats put to sleep each year because there [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > >MaryL I never claimed to be any kind of expert or anything. I merely wanted to point out that the 18 million figure was a bit too high.
Also, all of the sights you listed were from 1998 & 1999. Maybe things have improved slightly since then? (hopefully)
Justin
Mary - 17 Mar 2005 20:12 GMT > >> <snip> > >>>There is what 19 million cats put to sleep each year because there [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >> > >> source : http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/pet_overpopulation_and_owners hip_statistics/hsus_pet_overpopulation_estimates.html
> >> Justin > >> <snip> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Also, all of the sights you listed were from 1998 & 1999. > Maybe things have improved slightly since then? (hopefully) Nope.
MaryL - 17 Mar 2005 17:02 GMT > Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats > and [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! I agree with everything you have said. I not so much baffled by it as infuriated. I think the need for designer pets is often a type of elitism or hoped-for superiority, with no regard to the countless wonderful (and beautiful) cats that will be destroyed in the process. I say this knowing that many people truly love their pedigreed pets -- but couldn't they love mixed-breed pets just as well??
MaryL
cloudberry - 17 Mar 2005 17:20 GMT Equally - why do people breed their own children when there are so many unwanted, starving, deprived kids around the world?
They do it because they want to. And in a democracy freedom of choice is what we all respect.
Personally, after having "moggies" for 20 years + I fell in love with Oriental and Havana's in particular. I now have one moggy and two pedigrees. Many people I know have a mixture of moggs and pure breeds.
I have fostered for the CPL, I give money to them every month. At all cat shows in the he UK I have been to the CPL is represented. All Cat Clubs I have joined request donations for Welfare.
A true point is: if we all stopped buying purebreds it would still not stop there being unwanted cats. Most pedigree cat owners are very responsible, devoted animal lovers. They are just making a choice.
Why do people buy new cars when there are so many still useable older ones? Wouldn't it help to stop choking up the environment if we all did this? Choice. A freedom our grandparents all fought for 60 years ago.
My tuppence-worth!
Samantha
> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats > and [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! DW - 17 Mar 2005 21:27 GMT > Equally - why do people breed their own children when there are so many > unwanted, starving, deprived kids around the world? My wife and I tried to adopt kids years ago, we finally gave up and concluded the system didn't want the adopted. By keeping the kids in foster care it keeps social workers employed. Also some black social workers would rather have a black child in foster care for the entire 18 years than have the child adopted by a white family.
> Choice. A freedom our grandparents all fought for 60 years ago. You mean 229 years ago? (60 years ago was not freedom, it was against Hitler and others.)
I would add there sometimes good reasons to go with a specific breed. Some dog owners for instance have to have a certain breed because of allergies. (My sister in law is allegic to pets, the only dog she can tolerate is a Bijon Frisa (I prbobably butchered the spelling of it.)
DW - 17 Mar 2005 21:27 GMT > Equally - why do people breed their own children when there are so many > unwanted, starving, deprived kids around the world? My wife and I tried to adopt kids years ago, we finally gave up and concluded the system didn't want the adopted. By keeping the kids in foster care it keeps social workers employed. Also some black social workers would rather have a black child in foster care for the entire 18 years than have the child adopted by a white family.
> Choice. A freedom our grandparents all fought for 60 years ago. You mean 229 years ago? (60 years ago was not freedom, it was against Hitler and others.)
I would add there sometimes good reasons to go with a specific breed. Some dog owners for instance have to have a certain breed because of allergies. (My sister in law is allegic to pets, the only dog she can tolerate is a Bijon Frisa (I prbobably butchered the spelling of it.)
Mary - 17 Mar 2005 20:12 GMT > Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats and > dogs? A friend of our family is looking to buy a pure Russian Blue. She has > a lead on a breeder and is waiting for her cat to be "made". This > infuriates me when there are many wonderful creatures waiting at the local > shelter to be adopted. I'm with you, Lynn.
cloudberry - 17 Mar 2005 20:44 GMT Equally one could argue why don't all cats get bred carefully and thoughtfully like the vast majority of pedigree cats are? And that prospective owners have to be vetted - as all responsible pedigree breeders do, and that they have to pay a significant amount of money to buy a cat - proving they are really into it. Further, that all breeders should be licensed. This would control the cat populations quite a bit.
Yes there would still be rogues. But when abortion was decriminalised - the backstreet abortionists no longer had a dependant clientele.
People could breed non-pedigree and / or pedigree cats to suit themselves, their choice.
I had a terrible time trying to find a ginger tom kitten (NonPed) two years ago, couldn't find one in fact.
I spent 8 months trying to track down a Havana of the right sort and within 4 hours drive from here. That shows a bit of commitment. And commitment is what pets need to live well, be healthy and feel secure.
Pedigree cats are not the main problem here. The main problem is the natural fecundity of felines, and on the other hand care-less "I know, lets get a cat!" people who don't think things through properly and make silly rash decisions.
Samantha HOLCC
> Maybe I'm the oddball here, but what is the big fuss over pedigree cats > and [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree > babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! MaryL - 17 Mar 2005 21:19 GMT > Equally one could argue why don't all cats get bred carefully and > thoughtfully like the vast majority of pedigree cats are? decisions. <snip>
> Samantha I think you would find that most people who oppose breeding purebred cats actually oppose breeding *any* cats (purebred or not). In other words, we already have a tremendous overpopulation, with the result that a great many cats and dogs are euthanized every year. Much of this is caused by irresponsible pet owners, and much occurs as feral cats give birth. Those same feral cats occur because someone -- often many generations back -- failed to take responsibility. In fact, there are organizations such as Alley Cat Allies that practice TNR (trap-neuter-return) in an attempt to gain some control over this seemingly-endless problem.
MaryL
cloudberry - 18 Mar 2005 00:01 GMT I agree with you entirely. And our CPL (Cats Protection League) here in the UK do exactly the same thing - catch wild cats in humane cages, neuter them, and then return them to the wild.
One good friend of mine works in a Steel Mill - Caparo Merchant Bar - there is a litter of feral kittens there which have been repeated over five years. Finally last autumn with our help the local CPL managed to capture three - including the ever breeding mother - and neuter her. The kittens had a relatively good life for feral cats - a warm furnace open to them 24/7 - and all year round. All the guys brought food for them and shared their lunches with them also - so they hunted, but when times were hard they had some backup. But on the other hand, they were not "homed" = which essentially means no-one was prepared to pay their vets bills - which is the big difference between homed and unhomed cats
Interesting that so far no one on this group has identified that *essentially* this is the big difference between homed and not homed cats. Being prepared to pick up the vets bills. Essential part of responsible and loving pet ownership. And that is what lets most people down - is it lack of money? Lack of confidence to find a vet and use him? Fear of costs? Lack of experience thereof? Medical smalltalk?
They get a cat - and that is it.
Personally I have pro quals in A&P - and though *we* differ from cats - essentially we work the same (liver is liver, kidneys is kidneys etc) so I have always been pretty confidant - but also open to learning where my vet is expert.
. Who is to judge here? Cats : wild, warm (very - 24/7 furnace going = smart cats), adapting to their environment, well fed through bored workers who want a distraction in their lunchtime, but mainly those who love the kittens and cats and want to interact with them. Yes, big steel working guys, but this doesn't disassociate them from being soft cat loving guys either - and they are not.
How do we breach this crazy dynamic between free cats - doing their own thing (i.e I let my cats out, they have to have the real world, and I keep my cats in - that's because I love them too much to let them out - or more realistically because they don't have the space, or the time, or the commitment to make compromises in their living conditions for their cats.
I have.
There have been a few times when I viewed a house or flat and thought it ideal. For me. But not for my cats. And I have never, once ever, chosen to move somewhere which was not he best I could do for my cats.
But were they unhappy?
Well that's is an arguable point. Should cats be free to make their own decisions about their lives, or not? Are we really that capable of being "in control" of them and should we???
This is a point of which I do feel very, at times, indecisive about. My adoration of my cats wants me to protect them, but my love of their inherent freedoms makes me want to let them roam.
What do I do? I spend about ?2K each time I move on a bloody good cat run - with views, and entertainment for them. But hey - I don't have kids - nor would I want one - and so it is my thing to do the best by my cats that I can do.
An answer, one woman, three cats!.... usually taking all the bed space...
Sam
"Designer Pets" this is a bit of a biased way to start what we hope will be a reasonable debate. There is no such thing as a DESIGNER ANYTHING in the pet world.
>> Equally one could argue why don't all cats get bred carefully and >> thoughtfully like the vast majority of pedigree cats are? decisions. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > MaryL DW - 18 Mar 2005 00:33 GMT > Interesting that so far no one on this group has identified that > *essentially* this is the big difference between homed and not homed cats. > Being prepared to pick up the vets bills. Essential part of responsible and > loving pet ownership. > And that is what lets most people down - is it lack of money? Lack of
> confidence to find a vet and use him? Fear of costs? Lack of experience > thereof? Medical smalltalk? I would add expenses is a huge factor to consider. I went back and found that I average about $7,000+ per cat when you look at food/vets/supplies/etc.
And this for a cat that is relatively healthy.
Do yourself a favor, now that you have a computer put your checking account in a program like Quicken/Money/etc. and then you can see how much you really spend on your cats.
I didn't think I spent that much until I went back and looked at it closer.
cloudberry - 18 Mar 2005 01:28 GMT I don't doubt for a minute that you are right mate! But I would rather run an older car than miss my cats, or do them down. See my previous post where I tell that I travel 20 miles to a vet because they are better than the ones one mile away.
You are right, and I am not arguing with you. If you don't want the responsibility then don't own a pet. They do cost you. My boy Sid (a moggie before anyone jumps down my throat) who I had for 16 glorious years must have cost me about ?8K in vets bills over his lifespan. "2K a year??? Yep. And he was a farm cat I adopted from the CPL (Cats Protection League - biggest UK org for cat welfare).
Luckily I earn more these days and can afford insurance for all my cats. It was a tough time though when I couldn't. But they always had the care they needed, on time, and I made do and mended to cope.
The pure pleasure they bring me is more than worth 100 x what they ever cost me. So for me it is a labour of total love.
Best wishes friend,
Samantha UK
>> Interesting that so far no one on this group has identified that >> *essentially* this is the big difference between homed and not homed [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > I didn't think I spent that much until I went back and looked > at it closer. Patty234@earthlink.net.invalid - 18 Mar 2005 22:38 GMT >I don't doubt for a minute that you are right mate! But I would rather run >an older car than miss my cats, or do them down. See my previous post where [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] >> I didn't think I spent that much until I went back and looked >> at it closer. You are top posting which is fouling up the order of the posts and you are not editing which is making your posts hard to follow. Pretty please leave in all the attributes so we know who is saying what, quote the parts of the post to which you are responding and make your reply directly beneath each part. Delete any part of the post which you are not addressing.
In threads with multiple participants, where most users do not top post, it is confusing to say the least. Thanks.
Pat
cloudberry - 18 Mar 2005 01:19 GMT Dear Mary L,
I don't and cant disagree with anything you say. I know having fostered for the biggest cat welfare org in the Uk what we are up against. But I still maintain that the vast majority of pedigree cat owners are total cat enthusiasts - IMHO. And I can tell you for a fact - that through 20+ years of owning cats as an adult, plus another 16 on top of that with my parents - none of our cats were ever able to breed willy-nilly around the environment. Ever. They were all neutered at six months or just before.
I was brought up (raised in USA talk) to respect and adhere to cat and dog fecundity and realistic outcomes.
If one opposed breeding any cats at all - as you suggest. Then where are we cat lovers supposed to get our kittens from exactly? And do you not realise that the attitude you propose: and I quote = "actually oppose breeding of *any* cats (purebred or not). ". Is the dissolution of all cats, non-bred, half bred and consciously bred? What you are proposing is the abolition of cats. Cat holocaust.
I think that is a scandal. cats have rights, rights to propagate, to be cared for to live. And to be wild, where they are sustainable, in peace.
Fro gods sake woman - cats have to breed or we would live in a world without cats.
Get it?
The whole point is how to make the whole thing rational. And the sooner we realise that our concept of rational is not the same as a cats concept of rational - and try to draw some reasonable and compassionate conclusions from that.... is the day we even begin to understand cats.
Samantha - learning from her cats everyday.
>> Equally one could argue why don't all cats get bred carefully and >> thoughtfully like the vast majority of pedigree cats are? decisions. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > MaryL MaryL - 18 Mar 2005 01:47 GMT > Dear Mary L, > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Samantha - learning from her cats everyday. The problem is that we euthanize *millions* of cats every year in the United States (some estimates place it at 6 million). Obviously, I do not want to see the pet population eliminated -- I absolutely adore my cats and will *always* have cats. So, if we were ever to approach a point where there was somehow a "shortage" of cats, then I would certainly modify my statement about not breeding. Unfortunately, that is not the case -- and it is not likely to ever be the case, at least not in the United States and not in my lifetime. I worked as a Humane Society volunteer in an animal shelter, and it is truly heartbreaking to see the number of perfectly healthy cats and dogs that are euthanized every day simply because there are no homes for them. And that does not even include the vast population of feral cats. So, yes, I realize that cats have to breed in order to continue producing cats -- but I would like to see people make a decision to adopt those cats that have already been born rather than to breed still others and condemn cats in shelters to an early death (through euthanasia)...or, worse, to a dreadful death after abandonment when some people "drop them off somewhere."
MaryL
cloudberry - 18 Mar 2005 02:06 GMT But surely Mary this is a situation of re-education? Or if that fails - then maybe legislation re: licenses to keep pets? I am all for it.
I still maintain that if everybody stopped buying and breeding pedigree cats tomorrow - the problem of unwanted kittens would still exist. So pedigree cats and such like are not to blame. That is not to say there are not rotten awful greedy vile breeders out there - there always will be. Legal or not. But at least we can try to legislate against them?
Meanwhile - the sheer fecundity of cats is the problem. That one queen can be responsible for how many??? kittens in five years indirectly??? Is true - is fine... that is what cats do.
THE PROBLEM is their natural habitat is taken up by us humans, and then a fair proportion of us do not respect cats enough to help them. Or when we get one or two, make the responsible commitment (which I make to all my cats) to have and to care for them for the whole of their lives. And meet any expenses thereof.
Sorry if I seem over simplistic - but it is just a question of true values is it not?
Samantha
>> Dear Mary L, >> [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > > MaryL Mel - 17 Mar 2005 21:07 GMT Having a "pedigree baby" in no way guarantees the outcome of it's personality, intelligence, or capacity for affection or compassion. Quite different than a breed of pet.
Even within certain breeds of cats you do not always get what you expect. One of my friends has a Siamese that is so un-Siamese-like she has commented often on his dog-like personality. (She adopted him from our local SPCA - - no "made-to-order" necessary*smile)
I can understand those who have allergies requiring a specific breed ie: hairless, but in general, never did see the point in having one made to order to match with my furniture or winter coat. (don't laugh----I used to work at a vet clinic, and a woman chose her bengal cat to match her coat!! yes, I do believe her IQ was about -10. I certainly felt sorry for that poor cat.)
Myself, all my furchildren have been Hientz-57.....................I wouldn't have it any other way. Their personality differences are a delight to me, and knowing that I have saved lives that possibly would have otherwise been lost at the SPCA certainly makes me feel a lot better than having added to the problem.
Mel ----- Original Message ----- From: <jacquie0> Newsgroups: alt.cats Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:14 PM Subject: Re: Why do we need designer pets?
> Lynn via CatKB.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > terminating the pregnancy. I guess people like the idea of playing God > with innocent lives. Patty234@earthlink.net.invalid - 18 Mar 2005 22:08 GMT > Shouldn't we focus on providing loving families for the >furbabies already in this world rather than bringing more in? The thought >that appearance makes one creature more valuable than another outrages me. >What if we viewed human beings that way? Next we'll be ordering pedigree >babies to decorate our lives with. I for one am baffled! Me too. I'm outraged that people are having babies from their own genes. Shouldn't they focus on providing loving families for the children already in this world rather than bringing more in? The thought that appearance makes one child more valuable than another outrages me. What if we viewed human beings that way? WE DO. Next we'll be ordering pedigree babies to decorate our lives with. We already do.:) Pat
Brad - 19 Mar 2005 03:38 GMT >> Shouldn't we focus on providing loving families for the >>furbabies already in this world rather than bringing more in? The thought [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Pat If you weren't quite so outlandish your posts would be more interesting. I hate to burst your bubble but invetro <sp>? was designed for people who were having a problem getting pregnant and not for designer babies. You keep saying the same thing over and over using different words. Everyone wants a healthy and cute baby shame on everyone how could we be so self centered, however us rational people love them all just the same, I think we were talking about cats get off the kids kick you are just trying sensationalize.
Brad
LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE SAFELY IN A WELL-PRESERVED BODY, BUT RATHER TO SKID IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT, SHOUTING... " HOLY @#$%... WHAT A RIDE!"
KLR - 21 Mar 2005 14:29 GMT >> Shouldn't we focus on providing loving families for the >>furbabies already in this world rather than bringing more in? The thought [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Pat I'm not aware that we do this yet, (outside of research labs) but in the future it is an absolute certainty in my opinion.
|
|
|