Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cat buyers are confusing the heck out of me. Please HELP!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sereena Nightshade - 05 Mar 2005 01:50 GMT
I hope someone from this forum can give me some info ASAP. I run a small
cattery and I recently sold a kitten to some people who came in from out of
state (they put the kitten on reserve). Anyway, they came and took the
kitten (under some additionally odd circumstances) and several days later
they called wanting me address to send me payment. I called back and
provided my address. Now, today, about a week later I hear from them again
and they tell me that they took the kitten to the vet and it had the
following problems: Ear mites, fleas, a resp infection, and worms and the
vet told them it was only four weeks old. They also stated that the kitten
refused to eat anything for the first couple or several days that they had
it. Moreover, the vet reportedly told them that the kitten had never been
vaccinated. They claimed that the vet gave the kitten a blood test, which
confirmed that the kitten had never been vaccinated. Now I am really very
confused. That kitten was seven weeks old -- I'm 100% positive. That kitten
had been weaned for a week here and it had been eating Iams kitten chow
like a little piglet -- no problems. That kitten received it's first basic
4-way vaccine. That kitten had been dewormed. What the heck is going on? I
can buy the idea of ear mites and fleas as it's always possible that I
messed up and missed that because a lot was going on when I sold that
kitten and I had brought in some rescue puppies the week prior -- so
although I did not see fleas or knowingly sell a kitten with fleas (of ear
mites for that matter), it is possible (very possible as another litter
mate apparently had fleas and ear mites). A resp infection could have been
the result, possibly a combo result from  the recent new vaccine that had
been given and the move into a stressful home environment -- it now seems
that these buyers are a little wacky. However, four weeks old, NO and a
bloodtest which proves that no vaccine was given -- impossible, right? I
don't get it. The full sister to this kitten went to another home and she
too unfortunately had ear mites and fleas, but other than that the vet said
she was healthy and there were no reports from those people of the kitten
being only four weeks old or no vaccine having been given. I am definitely
going to tighten my methods here to deal with any and all fleas and ear
mites. I really have never had these kinds of problem or had anyone
complain before. Anyhow, Does anyone on this forum have any information
about the potential situation here? Has anyone ever heard of a similar
story? I'm really pretty freaked out because I have always done the best
that I could to keep my cats healthy and my clients satisfied and this
episode is something right out ot the Twilight Zone to me.
John Doeu - 05 Mar 2005 04:46 GMT
Welcome to retailing!  Why won't department stores take back party dresses who's tags have been removed?  Why can't you use a third-party check at a gas station?  Try this one the next time your local grocery store has a 2 for 1 sale: Buy 2 and lose the receipt.  Then next week bring one back and say your spouse bought the wrong item and you just want your money back.  Or, if you want a free cat just find a seller willing to allow you to take the cat home for a free trial.  Just make sure your idea of a trial period is about 20 years.

Signature

Jesus saves! at Citibank
CHANGE THE .sig in 'Server Prefs'!

Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:02 GMT
LOL! Cute or obnoxious -- whatever. What can I say, I felt sorry for these
two young women who had driven about five hours to get here and came in
with babies on their hips and one of the babies had thrown up all the way
out. I'm working on being more of a b*tch believe me. I also felt sorry for
a number of very sweet senior citizens and gave them discount prices (those
kittens/cats never had problems) and I felt empathy for a lady who was
receiving cancer treatments so I donated a purebred Russian Blue kitten to
her. By looking at some of the hate mail and vendetta hungry cat people and
buyers I guess all I really need to do to stroke my b*tch potential to a
razor's edge is keep reading this forum. See you've helped me already!
Maybe if I read this forum enough I can even get to the point where I can
lie about blood testing cats (that way I can run out and buy more queens
and not bother to test them all this time) and vaccines and not care when
the kittens die or when the client is unhappy! Yeeeeeeeehaw. No, I doubt I
can get to that point.
Mike Z. Helm - 08 Mar 2005 03:18 GMT
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:46:08 -0000, John Doeu
<john_does@nowhere.zzz.mmm>

>Welcome to retailing!  Why won't department stores take back party dresses who's tags have been removed?  Why can't you use a third-party check at a gas station?  Try this one the next time your local grocery store has a 2 for 1 sale: Buy 2 and lose the receipt.  Then next week bring one back and say your spouse bought the wrong item and you just want your money back.  Or, if you want a free cat just find a seller willing to allow you to take the cat home for a free trial.  Just make sure your idea of a trial period is about 20 years.

And stores always seem to want to get paid before you walk out the door
with your purchase.
John Doeu - 05 Mar 2005 04:59 GMT
Why do film developers say if they lose your film they will only replace your film--Not pay for a trip to China so you can take another picture of the Wall again.  
   If I bought a sick cat from a breeder I would threaten to sue the breeder if it did not pay for all of the cat's vet bills.  And since the breeder would be paying for the vet bills I would take it to the most expensive vet in town.  Further, since the cat is sick it will most likely die should the breeder ever want to come and see how sick the cat is.
Signature

Jesus saves! at Citibank
CHANGE THE .sig in 'Server Prefs'!

DW - 05 Mar 2005 05:23 GMT
> Why do film developers say if they lose your film they will >only
replace your film--Not pay for a trip to China so you can >take another
picture of the Wall again.
That is one of the reasons Digital Cameras are becoming so popular.
With my digital camera I can print the picture on
the spot werever that is.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:13 GMT
That's nice. Have you ever paused to wonder that maybe the buyer is
somewhat at fault for something here? Naw, you wouldn't ever want to go
there! I won't say that I'm perfect in this situation and I do have a
history of making things right and a zero death rate in the kittens and
cats that I have placed. Still, I guess if you were this specific buyer
you'd be happy with youself and all your greatness as you let the kitten go
without eating for several days and not even bothered to call me or a vet
because your vendetta against the seller (i.e. me) was far more important
than the wefare of the kitten. Etc.Etc.Etc. Yes, this kitten might die,
perhaps he is dead already, but a vendetta against me or any other seller
really doesn't help matters.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:34 GMT
Hey, I've got a special idea just for you (the extra nasty nasty-gram
artist)!!!!! I spent over $400 on medication to deal with any potential cat
fleas and worms (just in case as if there are fleas the cats will lick
their fur and ingest the eggs, which will cause worms, etc.) but I can hold
back on a few kittens so you can buy one from me, proceed to let it go days
without food while not contacting me or the vet and then it'll get really
sick and you can sue me! Won't that be fun for you?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? It could
make you feel so very superior and brilliant and all of that! And if you
win that lawsuit you can get your share of nothing as all of my money goes
into my cats and other animals!

P.S. For everyone else, I've been digging through the hair on every cat I
have for days now and I have not found one flea yet nor have I found flea
dirt. I don't know what to think, but I'm treating them all anyway (with
both external treatment and internal treatment) just in case. I get the
meds from my vet.
M.C. Mullen - 05 Mar 2005 06:03 GMT
| I am definitely
| going to tighten my methods here to deal with any and all fleas and ear
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
| that I could to keep my cats healthy and my clients satisfied and this
| episode is something right out ot the Twilight Zone to me.

Yes, I was in the same position as a buyer, the cat was not well at all
although they claimed that a vet had given a clean bill.
My cat had a very bad infestation of ear mites and the digestion was not
well. I had to pay a fortune afterwards.
I believe that your buyers are overacting, but I have to ask: Is it not too
early to give away a kitten with 7 weeks?
I won't give mine away before they're 12 weeks old.

Carola
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 01:26 GMT
I don't know where to begin as there are sooooooooooo many nasty-grams
here. I agree with the person who said it is rude to chew people out on web
forums and that we all make mistakes. To begin with, within my state the
vast majority of kittens are sold at 6 weeks to 8 weeks -- very many by six
weeks and unfortunately this is what the buyers demand.

The kittens full sister (same age == same litter == nearly the same size/
the cat whose buyer is acting like a wackadoodle was actually the more
robust of the two in that litter) went to a vet and was not diagnosed as
being sick or defective or ready to die.

Though the kittens full sister did have fleas and ear mites the sister was
otherwise very healthy and was eating and doing fine in her new home.

AS for checking the cats for fleas -- I do this daily and I saw no fleas on
any of my other cats at the time of the sale.

AS for checking for worms -- same thing. I routinely get my adult cats
tested for worms by taking fresh poop to the vet. There have never been
worms before this.

There were no worms in the poop either.

My adult cats are also ALL blood tested for kitty HIV and Feline Leukemia.

Unlike literally ALL the other small and large cattery owners I know in the
state I am the only one who has NEVER had a kitten or cat die in the new
home. My success rate was perfect before this last week.

Even the cattery owners in this state who never place kittens before 12
weeks have had some death rate and complications once kittens have been
placed. I have not until this last week.

When clients have had minor problems, and I must stress that this has been
very rare, if I am contacted prior to them going crazy and in their lack of
experience running up ridiculous bills and causing much panic, I go to my
vet and purchase medication to deal with the kitten's trouble. There is no
cost to the client. The vet is familiar with my cats and there is always
accurate instruction on how to use the needed medication. Again I have had
a zero death rate prior to whatever else is going to happen next in this
situation.

The first vaccine I get from my vet and I give it to the kittens myself.
There is no logical need to pay the vet an additional $10.00 on top of the
price of the vaccine so that the vet can stick the needle in. I learned how
to give shots from my vet. I am thus capable of giving them.

Some kittens do get a minor resp infection from that first vaccine and also
sometimes from the stress of moving. This happens regardless of whether
they are 7 weeks or 12 weeks. It happens no matter who gave the shot -- the
vet or me. I have learned this through experience.

I too have purchased cats, very expensive cats, and cats who passed a vet
exam only to have those cats contract a minor resp infection within a week
after the purchase. I did not go on a vendetta against the seller of the
cat. When I began with cats I would contact my vet and also the seller to
get help and advice. The sellers were always willing to give sound advice
and it was helpful in many ways. I did not have to create a drama or a
situation that might lead to the cat's death because I was ignorant or
insane or not thinking straight.

No cat that I ever purchased died and I'm sure my method of dealing with
the problems that did arise helped in this area.

The sellers who sold me my initial cats were not trying to screw me over.
Sometimes things happen and a seller cannot always know it is coming. We do
the very best that we can.

When I began in the cats a number of sellers did warn me about crazy buyers
and did tell me some nightmare stories. They weren't graphic enough I guess.

Back to this kitten's age: This kitten was a large robust Mainecoon
outcross. The kitten had already been weaned for a week and had shown no
signs of health issues.

The kitten ate extremely well and the stool specimens in the litter box
were always normal and not full of worms or anything else alarming or
unusual.

This kitten had been bathed and I never saw any fleas and anyone who knows
anything about major flea problems in any animal knows that fleas become
aggitated when you wash the animal. Fleas do not hide and wait till the
bath is over -- they hop and move and can be seen when an animal is washed.
I did not see fleas in this kitten.

Though I do not completely deny that the kitten had problems as I believe
the problems have occured, I am wondering what the buyer did to the kitten.

I am wondering what the buyer was doing for those several days when the
kitten was not eating. They certainly were not calling me for help or
advice or anything else.

I would have been happy to send the buyer medication (for ear mites, fleas
and the resp infection) from my vet's office. A huge vet bill was not
needed and the buyer would have gotten help and medication faster from me
than they did waiting apparently days while the kitten was not eating.

I have done this before (though never with so many reported problems) and
again there has been a ZERO death rate of cats that have been bought from
me.

My clients have always kept in touch, prior to this, so I'd hear all about
it if there had been other horrible problems.

Anyway, if the kitten left my place on death's door it certainly was the
healthiest most robust bouncing playful fully weaned bundle of fluff ever
to be on death's door so quickly. Moreover, I guess the full sister is
quite special as she is not on death's door and she too saw a vet.
Moreover, she was not as robust, though not frail either, as the one that
is now reportedly in such poor shape.

Regarding the rescue puppies. They were separated for a time, washed,
vaccinated and dewormed. There was no obvious evidence of fleas on them.
Still I somewhat suspect them as I can't see any other way the infestation
could have happened.

Regarding all the hate mail -- I've got to say the very nice and
informative cattery owners that got me started were right on target. I
really do have to put the smack down on you guys. I will from now on force
all clients to sign a contract and moreover perhaps I shouldn't worry so
darn much about paying through the nose to blood test and stool test all my
adult cats and vaccinate regularly and offer so much help to clients when
there is a problem. After all, there is such a sense of entitlement going
on here and absolutely zero realization of exactly how much work and money
is spent on these cats in a constant effort to offer healthy socialized
kittens -- kittens without deadly diseases (until maybe now). There appears
to be an expectation that I should literally be perfect and make no errors
when the bottom line is everyone make an error sometimes and also sometimes
a problem pops up that the seller is not aware of because there were no
signs before the cat left.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 01:55 GMT
> I don't know where to begin as there are sooooooooooo many nasty-grams
> here.

You are malicious and hateful and no friend to cats. Here in alt.cats,
people like cats, they do not exploit them for money.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:36 GMT
How exactly do you know that I exploit cats for money? I think your
conclusion is both utterly illogical and wrong.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 05:53 GMT
> How exactly do you know that I exploit cats for money? I think your
> conclusion is both utterly illogical and wrong.

You are separating babies from their mothers too soon, for one
thing. For another, with so many cats that need homes right
now, you are contributing to the overpopulation problem.
Shame on you.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 18:57 GMT
Hi Mary,
What age do you suggest I wean large robust kittens that are 100% out of
the nest, litter box trained, not nursing anymore and eating well on their
own? I checked my records with some extra compulsion and must make a
correction on the age that the kitten was place -- he was eight weeks, not
seven weeks. This age error (stating he was a bit younger is not unusual
for me due to the demand to sell kittens so young)when not papered I
sometimes shave a week off the age making them one week younger and I
approx the age for the client. Clients prefer to hear about seven weeks
better than they like to hear eight weeks. With papered kittens I never do
this because it isn't fair if the client wants to show the cat. Anyway, the
kitten was four week on Feb/01/2005. Since the kitten was not placed until
Feb/28/2005 that makes him eight weeks.
MaryL - 07 Mar 2005 20:13 GMT
> Hi Mary,
> What age do you suggest I wean large robust kittens that are 100% out of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> kitten was four week on Feb/01/2005. Since the kitten was not placed until
> Feb/28/2005 that makes him eight weeks.

A kitten should never be separated from its mother before 8 weeks of age --  
no matter what the buyers "demand."  Ten to 12 weeks is preferable.

MaryL
Schroedinger's Cat - 08 Mar 2005 01:06 GMT
> Hi Mary,
> What age do you suggest I wean large robust kittens that are 100% out of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> kitten was four week on Feb/01/2005. Since the kitten was not placed until
> Feb/28/2005 that makes him eight weeks.

If you were a responsible registered breeder you would never sell a
Maine Coon at 8 weeks.  The MC breeders in my country (Australia)
would not hear of such a thing (well the registered ones wouldn't,
dunno about the backyarders because they are capable of all sorts of
shonky behaviour!).  Just because they look big doesn't mean they are
mature.  The biggest MC breeder here is actually advocating that they
go at 14 weeks rather than 12 weeks as they are really not mature
enough even at 12 weeks (large breeds take longer).  Most breeders
here will let the kittens wean themselves (may take mum out if they
are now eating on their own), but not separate the kittens from their
littermates until at least 12 weeks.  The second 6 weeks gives them
extremely important socialisation time.  At what age do you place your
kittens who have papers?

Additionally, although sh*t can sometimes happen, most responsible
breeders would be highly unlikely to have ongoing problems with ear
mites and fleas (although this kitten could very well have picked up
fleas at its new home).  Treating regularly with a product like
Revolution would eliminate this altogether.  The reason this kitten
has no antibodies is likely because he was vaccinated too early.  He
probably still had maternal immunity and therefore the first vaccine
didn't work (the antibody response at that age is highly variable -
some respond and some don't).  If you were placing your kittens at 12
weeks or older, you could vaccinate them at 10-12 weeks and be much
more assured of generating immunity to the vaccine.  Also, your side
effects profile will go down (ie they'll be much less likely to come
down with respiratory symptoms after being vaccinated).

You may find the response here isn't what you expect.  Most posters on
this group are concerned about the *major* cat overpopulation problem
in the USA, and see breeders as contributing to this problem by
causing people to buy their cats instead of shelter cats who are
likely to die (and I reckon that's a fair take on the situation).
Also, reading between the lines I get the impression you don't always
breed purebreds (feel free to correct me if I have the wrong idea).
This would put you off side with registered breeders as well.
Additionally, why breed more cross-breeds when there are so many being
abandoned for want of a home?

The other thing is that if you place them at 12 weeks they can be
desexed before leaving your home - that ensures no (other?)
backyarders can repeat this cycle.  Orchid also makes a good point
about your testing programme, or lack thereof.  It's my understanding
that MC's at least should be sold with proof of testing for hip
dysplasia and HCM (or proof that the parents have been tested at the
appropriate age). If you're not even taking the kittens in for their
first vax, when are you getting all this other stuff checked?  And, if
a kitten is going as a pet the responsible thing to do is to get them
vet-checked with their first vax.  Then this whole scenario would not
have happened at all - your vet would have diagnosed the mites and
fleas, and you could have treated them appropriately.  Most breeders
factor this sort of thing into the price anyway, which is why purebred
cats aren't cheap! (And the price most times doesn't even cover the
cost of all this stuff).

Also, as a "registered, responsible breeder", are you showing your
cats?  Are you demonstrating that your cats are bred to a standard (of
type and temperament)? (And it is telling that you can't enter a show
cat until it is older than 12 weeks too).

There are always going to be the "instant gratification" buyers who
want a tiny baby cat that their kids can torment, but people who are
serious about a purebred cat are prepared to wait until it is old
enough.  Perhaps you should be selling to people who understand that
12 weeks *is* still a baby, and that it benefits the cat to be placed
later rather than sooner.  And they are prepared to pay for them too,
as they usually have some understanding of all the work needed to get
their kitten to 12 weeks, healthy and free from genetic problems. And
these sort of buyers notice you if you show your cats - they are
usually looking about at cat shows.  There is always going to be
someone selling cats at 6-8 weeks, but just because it is being done
doesn't make it right!

When I read your first post I thought you couldn't be serious in what
you were saying, as the distinct impression I gained was that of a
backyard breeder out to make some $$$, and not prepared to go the
extra miles.  It didn't help that you didn't sound sure of the
kitten's age that you sold.  Your post sounded a little troll-like, to
be honest.  And that is why you have had the responses you have.

Just some thoughts
Cath
M.C. Mullen - 06 Mar 2005 09:41 GMT
There appears
| to be an expectation that I should literally be perfect and make no errors
| when the bottom line is everyone make an error sometimes and also sometimes
| a problem pops up that the seller is not aware of because there were no
| signs before the cat left.

If I were you I'd offer to take the kitten back,  i n s t a n t l y !!
Then you see if they like it or not. If they give it back, then you've done
the cat a favour too.

Carola
KLR - 06 Mar 2005 15:34 GMT
>There appears
>| to be an expectation that I should literally be perfect and make no errors
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Carola

I agree with this.  I saw this post at lunchtime - and the feelings
that have been niggling at me tend to make me wonder if the kitten is
getting good treatment there.
M.C. Mullen - 07 Mar 2005 13:20 GMT
| >There appears
| >| to be an expectation that I should literally be perfect and make no errors
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| that have been niggling at me tend to make me wonder if the kitten is
| getting good treatment there.

I'd like to know of Sereena what she's going to do about the little kitten
now.

Carola
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 19:01 GMT
This is some good advice. Hmmmm. You're definitely right and I should have/
would have already if the buyer hadn't been so crazy sounding and hostile.
The buyer really intimidated me. Normally I would offer to take the kitten
back and I've taken them back before over smaller complaints (i.e. the
buyer's dog doesn't like the cat, the buyer's other cat doesn't like the
new kitten, etc.). I should get my courage up in this situation and dive
back in to call this mean sounding buyer and try to get the kitten back.
Thanks.
M.C. Mullen - 07 Mar 2005 13:38 GMT
| This is some good advice. Hmmmm. You're definitely right and I should have/
| would have already if the buyer hadn't been so crazy sounding and hostile.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
| back in to call this mean sounding buyer and try to get the kitten back.
| Thanks.

It's appropriate in newsgroups to leave the original text or part of it if
it's too long. So we know what you're talking about ...
The original text should show on the screen if you reply, if not, then use
copy and paste.

Carola
sriddles@aol.com - 06 Mar 2005 16:27 GMT
Yeah, you're a classic backyard breeder. Possibly a kitten miller but
I'm not sure.
You give the shots yourself to save ten bucks. Did it ever occur to you
that if you'd blown the 10-spot, the vet would have found the ear
mites? You don't vet-check your kittens to save money, right?
And you're selling "Maincoon outcrosses".  I hope you're educated more
about the genetics of the Maine Coon than you are about spelling the
name.
I'm still waiting on you to address the issue of the proper age to give
a 4-in-1 vaccine.

Sherry
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 19:27 GMT
Hi Sherri,
According to my vet the proper age to give the initial four way vaccine is
six weeks of age. I have taken kittens to the vet to get their vaccines and
this is when my vet has given the vaccines. As I explained, it was the vet
who taught me how to vaccinate a cat and/or kittens. Once my vet taught me
how to vaccinate and I vaccinated my adult cats (with booster shots and
whatnot) myself I thought that I had learned how to do it by myself. In
regards to using services from my vet -- I do. However, I don't run to my
vet for every little thing when I have been performing those things myself
for a while now. Regarding the ear mites. Ear mites are bad but they
usually do not kill a cat. I am treating my ear mite problem right now.
Regarding the fleas, why don't any of my other cats have fleas? Why don't
my dogs have fleas? Why didn't the two kittens that went to vets for
wellness exams have fleas? I guess these particular fleas are special --
they only wanted to bite the outcross kittens that sold on that specific
weekend.

As for me being a kitty mill -- great joke. I didn't know kitty mills did
as much for their cats as I have a long record of doing. I've read stories
about puppy and kitty mills (thus far more about puppy mills because
they're more available or easy to run into -- they're on the news all the
time) and my place does not match with that profile at all. Maybe I should
run a kitty mill -- it would sure be cheaper and you think I do anyway --
if I ran my place like a mill I'd have a lot less vet bills and cheaper
food, less or no vaccine, no flipping blood tests on my parent cats, I
wouldn't have to worry about my cat rooms/separating cats/avoiding
overcrowding, I wouldn't have to furnish my cat rooms, I wouldn't need cat
rooms because I could just stick them in little crowded cages outside (like
the pics I've seen of puppy mills), I wouldn't have to treat my ear mites
or fleas and worms that I don't see (worms in case there are fleas because
cats will lick the flea eggs off of their hair and that causes worms and I
don't want worms  -- treatment as a preventative),I wouldn't have to take
my adult cats or kittens to the vet when they do look like they have a
problem,
I wouldn't need to clean up after my cats all the time, etc.etc.  -- heck I
could go bonkers and make money instead of breaking even on a good season!

Maybe, since you think this is a mill or you think I'm a horrid backyard
breeder anyway I should just go for it? There was a nifty story about a
kitty mill on the local news last year. This mill owner had Persians and
she kept them in these tiny wire cages -- old nasty rabbit or chicken cages
basically. Many of the cats had lost their feet because of the wire floor
cages and all of the cats were 1/2 starved, sick, flea/worm/mite ridden,
hair matted from never being groomed or shaved (the mill owner never even
tried to groom or shave), etc. The Humane Society had to put a large number
of the rescued cats down because they were in such poor shape that they
couldn't be saved. Many other cats from that mill needed limbs amputated
because they were so badly damaged from the wire cages and infection. There
is another kitty mill owner in my state who I have heard also keeps
Persians in chicken cages in her yard -- she keeps them in the chicken
cages with wire floors and all year around, even in the scalding hot
summers and she doesn't even care when they die in there. She doesn't even
provide roofs for them to help them survive. I do not know where she is
located at though.

In regards to my spelling -- sorry but it has always been pretty bad though
I made good grades in college.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 01:55 GMT
Yes seven weeks is usually a bit early. I base the age of placement on the
individual cats in the individual litters. These were robust kittens who
appeared to be very healthy here. Yet it is better to wait until the
kittens are older. 12 weeks to 14 weeks is the ideal.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 01:58 GMT
> Yes seven weeks is usually a bit early. I base the age of placement on the
> individual cats in the individual litters. These were robust kittens who
> appeared to be very healthy here. Yet it is better to wait until the
> kittens are older. 12 weeks to 14 weeks is the ideal.

Can't you find a better way to make a living than exploiting
wonderful creatures? Have you no abilities at all?
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:42 GMT
Ah, I see. I think you are possibly reacting to my nasty-grams to the nasty-
gram people who wrote to me? Hopefully I didn't accidentally put one of
these mean replies in the wrong spot because I am not used to using a forum
and I see that some of my replies seem to be in the wrong place. In any
case, I don't believe that I am exploiting cats -- if I were I'd be making
more money and have less vet bills from things like blood tests (to make
sure my parent cats don't have certain diseases), vet checks, vaccines,
grooming supplies, housing, helping out clients when a minor problem has
cropped up (an occurance which has actually been very rare), etc. Moreover,
if I were exploiting my cats I'm 100% sure that I'd have more litters of
kittens because my cats are certainly willing to breed more often than I
let them!
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 05:54 GMT
> Ah, I see. I think you are possibly reacting to my nasty-grams to the nasty-
> gram people who wrote to me? Hopefully I didn't accidentally put one of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> kittens because my cats are certainly willing to breed more often than I
> let them!

Who are you talking to? If you are talking to me, understand that
breeding cats, particularly when you don't know what you're doing,
is abusive and stupid. Those of us who love cats hate people who
do what you do.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 19:38 GMT
Hi Mary,
I was writing some nasty-grams to someone who was bashing me royally. Now I
went to reply to a note from you on this forum and I had to sign in again
so who knows where this is going to appear now. Anyway, in regards to, "who
are you talking to..." above is the answer. Regading breeding cats when you
don't know what you're doing as being stupid and whatnot -- I agree.
However, I am not a person who totally doesn't know what I'm doing. I am a
person who has had a good program, made a lot of clients very happy, made
my vet a little richer (or maybe I've made my vet more than a little richer)
and have done well but haven't made a lot of money until very recently.
Recently, I made a mistake or two. Recently I messed up. What I've tried to
explain repeatedly is that this hasn't happened to me before. That's why I
posted to begin with -- I needed some help to figure this situation out and
to do better.
jacquie0 - 06 Mar 2005 05:55 GMT
>>Yes seven weeks is usually a bit early. I base the age of placement on the
>>individual cats in the individual litters. These were robust kittens who
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Can't you find a better way to make a living than exploiting
> wonderful creatures? Have you no abilities at all?

Mary......Picture this if you will. Your beloved cat companion has just
died. You are longing for another cat companion. You look all around to
find a beloved friend. There are none. The shelters have not had any for
months, friends and acquaintences don't have any either. Where do you go
now? Oh wait, you can't go anywhere to get a cat companion, because they
have all been spayed or neutered, and have not been able to reproduce
any kittens.
I can understand that you think that spaying and neutering your pets is
a good thing, and in most cases it is. However, remember that the people
who breed cats and dogs are usually responsible/reputable breeders who
know the ins and outs of the different breeds, and when and how often a
cat/dog should be bred. I am aware that there are a lot of puppy/kittens
mills out there, but not everyone who breed cats/dogs is one of them.
Please don't condemn someone for what they do, after all, it takes all
kinds of people to make this world go around.
sriddles@aol.com - 06 Mar 2005 16:20 GMT
Jacquie, I'm going to disagree with about everything you said. I hope
you take it in the spirit of usenet and not personally.
No one, anywhere, in the United States, will fail to find a kitten if
they're willing to check every shelter and rescue  in a 50-mile radius.
I can promise you this. This is still going to be true of our children,
and maybe our grandchildren. It's going to take a long time to turn
around the Titanic of our current overpopulation state.
And even if kittens *did* become scarce, that's a good thing.
Personally I would love to see every kitten such a precious and rare
commodity that people had to get on waiting lists. We'd have no more
dumped cats, far less abuse, less starving strays, and less euthanasia.
And responsible breeders are the minority, not the majority. Kitten
mills are alive and well, but even more so, the ordinary family who
buys a "mommy cat" and a "daddy cat" and decides to make money having
kittens. They don't have a clue what they're doing, they'll sell to
anything with money in their hand, and they don't require spay/neuter
contracts.
And, yes, I condemn them. I have that right, because I am the one who
spends a great deal of my time and my money trying to clean up the mess
they're creating.

Sherry
jacquie0 - 06 Mar 2005 18:29 GMT
> Jacquie, I'm going to disagree with about everything you said. I hope
> you take it in the spirit of usenet and not personally.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Sherry

Sherry,
I too see the results of unwanted, overbred, abused, and unloved cats. I
too know the ramifications of the kitten/puppy mills. I simply was
stating that not all breeders are like that. I also wish that we could
have things such as waiting lists for cats, dogs, birds.....heck, all
pets. Unfortunately, those waiting lists are for purebred, or pedigree
animals only. I strongly feel that we do not have the right to condemn
every person who is a breeder. Unless I know all of the circumstances,
and have seen with my own eyes each individual breeders animals and
facilities, I must give them the benefit of the doubt. This may be
unfortunate, but true.
Don't worry, you have not offended me in any way, and I have not taken
what you stated personally in any way. Believe me, if I could personally
watch over ever animal breeder world wide, I would. However, I am not a
super human, and that is just not possible. All I can do is watch over
the ones in my area, and pray that those who are doing it just for the
almighty dollar, will in some way come to an untimely.......well, you
know what I mean.
Hope all is well with you and your furbaby(s).

Jacquie.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 06 Mar 2005 22:20 GMT
>I strongly feel that we do not have the
>right to condemn every person who is a
>breeder.

Yes, we do. The very serious problem of overpopulation and the resulting
killing of vast numbers of innocent animal KILLED every year for lack of
homes is NOT A SECRET. Anybody, and I mean ANYBODY that adds even one
more kitten to the equation should be condemned as they have created a
situation which results in one less home for cats that already exist. NO
breeder on the planet has earned nor deserves a special pass that
absolves them from being responsible for the death of innocents.
http://community.webtv.net/zuzu22/overpopulation

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 22:54 GMT
I am all for this statement, "I strongly feel that we do not have the right
to condemn every person who is a breeder. Unless I know all of the
circumstances, and have seen with my own eyes each individual breeders
animals and facilities, I must give them the benefit of the doubt. This may
be unfortunate, but true." I am especially for people SEEING the cats and
facility before they bash any breeder. I am also a believer in trying to
educate and help out before bashing others who are trying to do their best.
For breeders who care education is something they will welcome. Everyone
makes mistakes and everyone has to learn from their mistakes. Even the best
breeders have made an occasional mess at some point in their lives as cat
or dog or whatever animal breeder.

In regards to show cat breeders their doo-doo stinks too. I obtained two
top quality Persians from a breeder who shows both in the USA and in
Europe. Her cats are some of the best in the world. Her house is a mansion
and it is full of endless ribbons, trophies and other awards. She is a
judge for show cats. Etc.Etc. I could probably write a book about how
Godlike this woman is. Well, her cats are kept in individual cages and they
are pretty much feral because of a lack of attention and TLC. They don't
know what it's like to be held or pet or much of anything else. But she is
one of the top (could NEVER be accused of being a backyard breeder) out
there. Go figure.
Mike Rhino - 07 Mar 2005 00:48 GMT
> I am all for this statement, "I strongly feel that we do not have the right
> to condemn every person who is a breeder. Unless I know all of the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> one of the top (could NEVER be accused of being a backyard breeder) out
> there. Go figure.

I'm surprised by all the attacks on you.  I'm sure you're a nice person.
Somebody on this thread supplied a link that talked about Breeding quality,
Show quality, and Pet quality.  In my opinion, pet quality is what should be
bred.  The goal is to produce good pets, so they have to be pets first
before they can be judged.

Some people on this thread a concerned about pet overpopulation.  Many of
the cats breeding today are wild animals and wild animals die.  Not just,
cats, but any animal out in the forest is going to have a high death rate.
You just have to accept the fact that for many animals, a high death rate is
normal.  I don't view that as a sufficient reason to not breed cats.  If we
spay all the pets and just let the feral ones breed, that may change the
breed in ways we don't like.
sriddles@aol.com - 08 Mar 2005 15:01 GMT
> I'm surprised by all the attacks on you.  I'm sure you're a nice person.
> Somebody on this thread supplied a link that talked about Breeding quality,
> Show quality, and Pet quality.  In my opinion, pet quality is what should be
> bred.  The goal is to produce good pets, so they have to be pets first
> before they can be judged.

Except "pet quality" animals are produced by the millions already. They
are already in shelters waiting for a home.

> Some people on this thread a concerned about pet overpopulation.  Many of
> the cats breeding today are wild animals and wild animals die.

ONly a fraction of the cats brought to shelters by the general public
are "wild", i.e. feral. The vast majority are simply the product of
uncontrolled breeding. We're talking about healthy, adoptable kittens
and cats of all ages. They are, for the majority, the offspring of
abandoned pets and free-roaming, owned unneutered cats.

Not just,
> cats, but any animal out in the forest is going to have a high death rate.
> You just have to accept the fact that for many animals, a high death rate is
> normal.  I don't view that as a sufficient reason to not breed cats.  If we
> spay all the pets and just let the feral ones breed, that may change the
> breed in ways we don't like.

Except they aren't dying naturally in the forest. They're dying with an
injection of sodium pentobarbitol at the hands of employees paid by
your tax dollars. If compassion and ethics aren't enough to convince
someone that the breeding has got to stop, just think about the
millions of taxpayer dollars spent each year on building and staffing
shelters, abuse investigations, and "warehousing" and the 8-12 million
(yes, that's MILLION) dogs and cats that enter shelters each year. Add
to it the cost of euthanizing EIGHT MILLION of those 12 million dogs
and cats.

Sherry
MaryL - 08 Mar 2005 15:44 GMT
>>In my opinion, pet quality is what
> should be
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Sherry

Absolutely!  Every one of my cats was "pet quality" (read: *not* purebred).
No one could possibly have come up with finer cats, regardless of breeding
practices.  They have been beautiful to look at and even more beautiful in
the ways that really count (behavior, personality, companionship, etc.).  In
my opinion, each of my cats has been perfect -- and there are uncounted
numbers of others like them that will be euthanized simply because there are
not enough homes for them.

MaryL
Mike Rhino - 09 Mar 2005 04:13 GMT
> Absolutely!  Every one of my cats was "pet quality" (read: *not* purebred).
> No one could possibly have come up with finer cats, regardless of breeding
> practices.  They have been beautiful to look at and even more beautiful in
> the ways that really count (behavior, personality, companionship, etc.).  In
> my opinion, each of my cats has been perfect

Aren't those the sort of cats that people should be breeding?
MaryL - 09 Mar 2005 08:03 GMT
>> Absolutely!  Every one of my cats was "pet quality" (read: *not*
> purebred).
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Aren't those the sort of cats that people should be breeding?

The point is (which I probably didn't make clear) is that none of my "pet
quality" cat were purebred.  They were wonderful, gorgeous cats -- but not
what breeders are trying to achieve.  They were happy accidents of nature,
as are many millions of other cats.  They were also cats that had homes
precisely because I did *not* purchase purebred cats.

MaryL
M.C. Mullen - 09 Mar 2005 12:58 GMT
| The point is (which I probably didn't make clear) is that none of my "pet
| quality" cat were purebred.  They were wonderful, gorgeous cats -- but not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
|
| MaryL

I'm being very serious:
Aren't all cats gorgeous? And if they're not, then they have behavioural
problems, mostly caused by humans?

I even feel like going one step further: Wouldn't this just apply to all
animals?

And now I'm getting brave: Could it even be applied to humans too?

Carola
MaryL - 10 Mar 2005 03:04 GMT
> | The point is (which I probably didn't make clear) is that none of my
> "pet
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Carola

Yes, I think almost every cat that is healthy and well-cared-for is
beautiful -- in all meanings of the word.

MaryL
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 22:45 GMT
Sherry,
I've got to tell you that you're quote of, "No one, anywhere, in the United
States, will fail to find a kitten if
they're willing to check every shelter and rescue  in a 50-mile radius.
I can promise you this..." is pretty much untrue in my area. I have clients
who search in a 100 plus mile radius and they cannot find a kitten through
a shelter/rescue or anywhere else unless they are willing to pay for and
actually want to own a purebred show cat. My clients in general are well
able to afford a purebred show kitten, but they are not interested in that.
The average distance my clients drive to see me is between 50 to 200 miles
one way.
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Mar 2005 04:07 GMT
>>>Sherry,
I've got to tell you that you're quote of, "No one, anywhere, in the
United
States, will fail to find a kitten if
they're willing to check every shelter and rescue  in a 50-mile radius.

I can promise you this..." is pretty much untrue in my area. I have
clients
who search in a 100 plus mile radius and they cannot find a kitten
through
a shelter/rescue or anywhere else unless they are willing to pay for
and
actually want to own a purebred show cat. My clients in general are
well
able to afford a purebred show kitten, but they are not interested in
that.
The average distance my clients drive to see me is between 50 to 200
miles
one way. <<<

Bullshit. So what you're trying to tell me is, your clients aren't
really interested in your "purebred show" kittens...they just can't
find kittens, and you're providing this wonderful service. Yeah, right.
Tell me where you live in the US, and I guarantee between shelters,
municipal pounds, rescue groups, or "free kitten" ads in the paper,
I'll find a kitten. We euthanize kittens by the *millions* in this
country. There are *plenty* of kittens to go around, already born.

Sherry
Shadow Walker - 09 Mar 2005 19:44 GMT
What if you live in a county that dos not have an animal shelter or pound?

Shadow Walker

> >>>Sherry,
> I've got to tell you that you're quote of, "No one, anywhere, in the
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Sherry
sriddles@aol.com - 09 Mar 2005 20:24 GMT
> What if you live in a county that dos not have an animal shelter or pound?
>
> Shadow Walker

I think most civilized countries do have rescue organizations of some
kind. I assume you're asking this hypothetically. You live in Texas,
right?

Sherry
M.C. Mullen - 07 Mar 2005 13:30 GMT
| but even more so, the ordinary family who
| buys a "mommy cat" and a "daddy cat" and decides to make money having
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
|
| Sherry

But if they do it to make money, they cannot calculate.
If I add what I spend for food, worming, ear treatment, shots then the
kitten is already expensive when it's 10 weeks old.
It can only work out financially if you have purebreds where you can ask for
a good price.
But then again here if someone wants to afford a purebred he wants papers
too, so backyard breeders don't have much of a chance.

Right, we have discussed this before:
In northern Europe we don't have much of a kitten problem. (Not in the
south, there the cat colonies take over whole ancient cities!)
I believe the reason is that everyone normally cares for the kittens, and
the ones who adopt are usually aware of the fact that it is a lifetime
commitment.
We have so few cats and dogs in the shelters that we can 'import' from the
south and the east, but that's another topic.

Carola
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Mar 2005 15:26 GMT
Carola wrote:
>>>But if they do it to make money, they cannot calculate.
If I add what I spend for food, worming, ear treatment, shots then the
kitten is already expensive when it's 10 weeks old.
It can only work out financially if you have purebreds where you can
ask for
a good price.
But then again here if someone wants to afford a purebred he wants
papers
too, so backyard breeders don't have much of a chance. >>>>

That's why the OP pracices do-it-yourself vet care. She's got a vet who
provides medications without actually examining the cat.  That's why
she was strangely silent when asked about PKD and other testing. That's
why she sells at 7-8 weeks--she gets her money faster and spends less
per kitten. Most breeders claim a "love of the breed" is their reward,
and stick with one breed they are extremely knowledgeable about per
genetics. The OP has several different breeds --which gives more
variety to sell. She's also selling outcross and non-papered kittens --
a responsible breeder would never DREAM of doing that.
Think about this -- it's the most important aspect of this whole deal.
She's selling non-papered and  papered kittens and not requiring
contracts. She has no control over whether those kittens go on to breed
even more moggies.. <<<<

<<In northern Europe we don't have much of a kitten problem. (Not in
the
south, there the cat colonies take over whole ancient cities!)
I believe the reason is that everyone normally cares for the kittens,
and
the ones who adopt are usually aware of the fact that it is a lifetime
commitment.

I have heard that mentioned on the newsgroups many times, and it's
always been curious to me. But, whatever the reason for it, it's
wonderful that you all don't have the heartbreak associated with a
critical overpopulation of healthy kittens. I hope you never do. And I
hope you understand the reasons that some Americans get absolutely
crazy at the mention of backyard breeding. At the thought of creating
more kittens when beautiful, healthy kittens & adults are killed in
this country by the millions. Worst of all, this OP's kittens aren't
all purebreds, and aren't all papered, and she has no control over
whether they're bred.. She's basically  just cranking out more moggies.

Sherry
Amanda Jones - 07 Mar 2005 15:48 GMT
> Right, we have discussed this before:
> In northern Europe we don't have much of a kitten problem. (Not in the
> south, there the cat colonies take over whole ancient cities!)

Shelters in the UK don't put down cats at all, unless it is medically
necessary. It's pretty difficult to get kittens from shelters here, there
aren't many available.

A mate of mine recently adopted 3 cats, aged 13 years old, from a shelter,
and she said you practically have to beg before they'll let you have a cat
(-:

Amanda
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Mar 2005 18:41 GMT
Amanda wrote:
>>>A mate of mine recently adopted 3 cats, aged 13 years old, from a
shelter,
and she said you practically have to beg before they'll let you have a
cat
(-:

And that's the way it should be.  Unfortunately, this OP has indicated
that she's so desperate to sell kittens that she homes them at 6-8
weeks, just because that's what the "client wants."  She's placing the
opportunity to sell the kitten before what's actually *best* for the
kitten, which is staying with their mum at least another three weeks.
She says if she doesn't sell at that age, people will go elsewhere and
spend their money.

Sherry
Amanda Jones - 08 Mar 2005 08:47 GMT
> And that's the way it should be.  Unfortunately, this OP has indicated
> that she's so desperate to sell kittens that she homes them at 6-8
> weeks, just because that's what the "client wants."  

That does seem very young. When I found the (now bigger) of our stray cat
cubs, the vet estimated his age as about 8 weeks, away from his mother for
about a week or so (from his condition) and said he shouldn't have left
his family at that stage. Obviously as he was found tied up in a bin bag,
the choice wasn't mine! He was tiny, and although he ate and used the
litter tray properly, he was quite clingy for a while and didn't like
being left alone at all for a while.

When our cat had kittens when I was 13 or so, our vet recommended keeping
them with their mother until they were at least 12-14 weeks old. One went
to his new home at 12 weeks, one we kept for good (she's now 14), and the
other two (who went to the same home) we kept until 17 weeks owing to the
circumstances of the new family - they were moving house or something. By
14 weeks, Mama cat had just about had enough of 3 growing kittens bouncing
around, and would retreat to the top of a cupboard from time to time to
get some peace and quiet! She didn't seem sorry to see the pair of them
leave together at 17 weeks, and settled down. They weren't any particular
breed - just "cattus moggus", father unknown....

And before anyone gets upset, it wasn't the equivalent of kitten murder -
in London a cat having one litter of kittens doesn't mean that a litter in
a shelter dies.

Amanda
CHAR WAINSCOTT - 11 Mar 2005 16:12 GMT
Why would you breed kittens when there are so many in shelters both kill &
no-kill. You are a very selfish person. Take a walk through a shelter once
and look around will ya!
sriddles@aol.com - 05 Mar 2005 07:22 GMT
What did your vet say about all this?
You *did* take the kittens for a vet check didn't you, at the time the
kitten was dewormed and vaccinated?

Sherry
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 01:59 GMT
> What did your vet say about all this?
> You *did* take the kittens for a vet check didn't you, at the time the
> kitten was dewormed and vaccinated?

Can you even believe this thing?
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:52 GMT
Okay, who is "Can you believe this thing?" A penname will do or perhaps a
more specific question so that I might try to answer it.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 05:56 GMT
> Okay, who is "Can you believe this thing?" A penname will do or perhaps a
> more specific question so that I might try to answer it.

Your posts are reaching Usenet, though you are posting from a web site.
Do you know that Google is archiving your posts forever? And if you don't
include a snippet of the post to which you are referring most people just
think you're talking to yourself.

Why do you have a name like a porn actress? I thought you bred cats
for a living.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT
Hi Mary,
LOL! "A name like a pron actress," eh?!?!?! Alas, I'm afraid I'm not one of
those. I do breed cats but I wouldn't go so far as to state that I breed
cats for a living. As for my posts being stored and it looking like I'm
talking to myself (even though I'm not) oh well. People generally think
what they want anyway no matter any proof to the contrary.
Mike Z. Helm - 08 Mar 2005 03:37 GMT
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:56:35 -0500, "Mary" <marys@catlover.com>

>> Okay, who is "Can you believe this thing?" A penname will do or perhaps a
>> more specific question so that I might try to answer it.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Why do you have a name like a porn actress? I thought you bred cats
>for a living.

Sounds more Wiccan to me.  

http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/n/nighde05.html

excerpt:

"According to old legends, the plant belongs to the devil who goes about
trimming and tending it in his leisure, and can only be diverted from
its care on one night in the year, that is on Walpurgis, when he is
preparing for the witches' sabbath. The apples of Sodom are held to be
related to this plant, and the name Belladonna is said to record an old
superstition that at certain times it takes the form of an enchantress
of exceeding loveliness, whom it is dangerous to look upon, though a
more generally accepted view is that the name was bestowed on it because
its juice was used by the Italian ladies to give their eyes greater
brilliancy, the smallest quantity having the effect of dilating the
pupils of the eye."

Although, Nightshade is also sometimes called Belladonna and wouldn't
you know it, that is a pornstar's name:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0068643/

(Don't worry - no porn on that site, just a list of the 100+ movies
she's appeared in over a 5 year period)
Mary - 08 Mar 2005 07:19 GMT
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:56:35 -0500, "Mary" <marys@catlover.com>
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> (Don't worry - no porn on that site, just a list of the 100+ movies
> she's appeared in over a 5 year period)

Porn does not worry me. :) Thank you for the informative post!
Did you know that Belladonna used to be used as a laxative
about 100 years ago?
M.C. Mullen - 08 Mar 2005 09:33 GMT
| Porn does not worry me. :) Thank you for the informative post!
| Did you know that Belladonna used to be used as a laxative
| about 100 years ago?

I have some Belladonna tablets in my cupboard which help ease tension (not
on prescription either) - and they work!!

Carola
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:50 GMT
Out of the four kittens I sold on that particular weekend, the other three
also went to the vet. Two for basic wellness exams and those two had no
problems whatsoever even though they were kept in the same place as the
kittens with reported fleas and also the one (one of the two Mainecoon
outcross) with the reported death's door resp infection. What does my vet
say about this? Well, since I did not hear about the reported problem in
time to do anything with my vet yet I don't know. However, I am getting
medication (described above) and external products to deal with any
potential problem which may exist here. I would have liked to take the
kitten (that is reportedly so ill) to my vet directly, but the kitten was
far away and the buyer did not contact me to inform me of any potential or
concrete problem prior. The kitten was not ill here so what can my vet say?
None of my other cats appear ill and I've been looking at them very closely
and hyper=compulsively for days now. I also have not been able to find a
single flea or flea dirt on any of my cats and I've looked believe me. My
vet has seen so much of my other cats and there has NEVER been a problem
even remotely like this before. That's why I was so freaked out. If I had
had a history of fleas and very sick cats and kittens and whatnot I would
not have been freaked out.
Orchid - 05 Mar 2005 16:01 GMT
>confused. That kitten was seven weeks old -- I'm 100% positive.

<snip>

> Anyhow, Does anyone on this forum have any information
>about the potential situation here? Has anyone ever heard of a similar
>story? I'm really pretty freaked out because I have always done the best
>that I could to keep my cats healthy and my clients satisfied and this
>episode is something right out ot the Twilight Zone to me.

Gods, where to start.....

To begin with, I am *appalled* that you sold a seven week old kitten.
Eight weeks is considered the absolute minimum age for a baby animal
to leave Mom, and responsible breeders wait until kittens are 12-16
weeks old.  You denied that kitten time to be naturally weaned, time
to learn to use the litterbox from Mom, time to learn to use a
scratching post from Mom, time to learn bite and claw inhibition from
Mom and littermates.  Honestly, I am not surprised that the kitten
stopped eating -- it's a common reaction to stress in cats, and the
stress that baby underwent is enormous.

As for fleas and ear mites, *you* should have been checking your cats
and kittens.  Actually you should have had those rescue puppies in
quarantine where they belonged until you could be sure they weren't
carrying anything harmful to your cats.  The puppies are also likely
where the kitten got the worms -- you do know that baby animals with
access to the outdoors or access to animals witrh access to the
outdoors should be wormed at least once a month until they are six
months old, right?

As for the 'blood test', I am assuming that's a titre test, which is
not always accurate in such a young kitten.  Why didn't you send the
kitten's shot records home with it?  Responsible breeders keep a
mini-medical record for each kitten, including the labels from the
vaccines given.

As for what you should do about this, only your own ethics can guide
you.  You did sell them a sick, too-young kitten -- those are absolute
facts.  Whether is was knowingly or not is of course the area that
can't be proven one way or the other.

I also think that you should read over the Guide linked to in my sig
and see if you pass those standards.  If not, you need to decide what
kind of breeder you want to be -- responsible or not.

Orchid
See Orchid's Kitties! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/bengalpage
Want a Purebred Cat?  Read This! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/orchid
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 01:53 GMT
I too used to be appalled at the age of kittens being sold in this state.
However, I learned the hard way -- six weeks old is the standard, period! I
never sell a kitten at six weeks nor do I always sell kittens at seven or
eight weeks. I base it on the individual kittens in the individual litter.
Many kittens are not placed until they are indeed 12 weeks or older. My
Persian kittens are NEVER placed before they are between 12 and 14 weeks. I
prefer to place kittens when they are older even though it becomes
difficult trying to convince the buyers that a nine or ten or eleven or
twelve, etc. week old kitten truly is still a baby cat. In regards to your
standards, I'd like to look at that list. However, I'd rather you not
completely judge me by this last week or so.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 01:59 GMT
> I too used to be appalled at the age of kittens being sold in this state.
> However, I learned the hard way -- six weeks old is the standard, period!

What an a.s you are.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 03:01 GMT
I don't believe the question, "What kind of a*s are you?" is really a great
question because you are not telling me what about me makes me an a*s in
your book. I cannot determine if you're reacting the idea that I breed cats
or if you're responding to the story of what happened with the recently
sort-of sold kitten or if you're reacting to my nasty-grams to the nasty-
grams I received, etc. If I am an a*s to replying to nasty-grams in the
same nasty tone than you are right about me -- nobody likes to be kicked
around, insulted, verbally abused or judged without a chance to answer
direct open questions or defend themselves with any and all potential
facts. There are facts in this case. Moreover, I never said that I was
great or perfect. I have already admitted to fault. However, the bottom
line remains what it is. The kitten was not ill when it left here, etc.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 05:57 GMT
> I don't believe the question, "What kind of a*s are you?" is really a great
> question because you are not telling me what about me makes me an a*s in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> great or perfect. I have already admitted to fault. However, the bottom
> line remains what it is. The kitten was not ill when it left here, etc.

You really are an a.s. Only a bigger a.s would disagree with this.
CHAR WAINSCOTT - 11 Mar 2005 16:14 GMT
Yes apparently she is insane.
Orchid - 06 Mar 2005 14:07 GMT
>I too used to be appalled at the age of kittens being sold in this state.
>However, I learned the hard way -- six weeks old is the standard, period!

    What state is that?  And how did you 'learn the hard way'?

>I
>never sell a kitten at six weeks nor do I always sell kittens at seven or
>eight weeks. I base it on the individual kittens in the individual litter.
>Many kittens are not placed until they are indeed 12 weeks or older. My
>Persian kittens are NEVER placed before they are between 12 and 14 weeks.

    How many breeds do you have?  I'd think that the cost of PKD
testing, HCM testing, and FHD testing on the Persians alone would be
extremely difficult to deal with?

> In regards to your
>standards, I'd like to look at that list.

    http:\\nik.ascendancy.net\orchid

    It's my guide for pet buyers who are looking for a healthy,
responsibly-bred, well-bred kitten.  Look at the breeder interview
section and honestly consider what your answers to that hypothetical
buyer would be and whether or not they'd be 'correct' answers.

Orchid
See Orchid's Kitties! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/bengalpage
Want a Purebred Cat?  Read This! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/orchid
Sereena Nightshade - 07 Mar 2005 00:14 GMT
I too used to be appalled at the age of kittens being sold in this state.
>However, I learned the hard way -- six weeks old is the standard, period!

   What state is that?  And how did you 'learn the hard way'?
************************************************************************
Considering how unpleasant so many people have been I don't think I want to
say what state this is. I learned the hard way by looking at what others
were doing (the age at which their kittens were typically sold) and not
agreeing with it -- so I did not market any of my kittens until they were
significantly older than the age at which others were selling and/or
placing their kittens. I would place my kittens at between 12 and 14 weeks.
The clients and/or buyers would then reward me by insisting that they
wanted a kitten not a teenage or older cat. I would explain to them all
that I have been told on this site and much more and the clients would not
get it. I would refer my clients to my cats books and my vet for informatio
and my clients did not care. They wanted a "kitten." The clients would then
go elsewhere (buying kittens between the ages of 6-8 weeks) and my kittens
were not being placed. Those 6-8 week old kittens would then receive dream
homes while my kittens continued to wait for a family of their own. My
friends and others I knew would update me on the dream homes their kittens
were getting so I go the regular reports. After awhile I tried it myself --
placing kittens younger and it went great until just recently. I do not
place 6 week olds though.
************************************************************************

>I
>never sell a kitten at six weeks nor do I always sell kittens at seven or
>eight weeks. I base it on the individual kittens in the individual litter.
>Many kittens are not placed until they are indeed 12 weeks or older. My
>Persian kittens are NEVER placed before they are between 12 and 14 weeks.

   How many breeds do you have?  I'd think that the cost of PKD
testing, HCM testing, and FHD testing on the Persians alone would be
extremely difficult to deal with?
***********************************************************************
The cost is difficult to deal with. It costs $30 per cat at my vet's
office. No office fee for just the blood work. The blood test for $30.--
covers both Feline Leukemia and Kitty HIV (as I put it to clients so they
will understand). I have a number of breeds but not that many cats per
catagory. Specifically I have the following: Persian, Manx, Maincoon,
Siamese, Russian Blue. (I have two RB total).
A general vet visit is also $30 and I use that service pretty regularly but
unfortunately not for the past month. A kitten litter exam is the same.
Fort Dodge vaccine, the one I prefer, is about $8.00 per shot -- I usually
buy in trays though because I have been known to vaccinate ranch cats at
other's places and it's good to have a tray around. A poop exam for worms
is $15.00 per cat -- a service I've also used a lot -- just to make sure
there aren't any.
**********************************************************************
> In regards to your
>standards, I'd like to look at that list.

   http:\\nik.ascendancy.net\orchid

   It's my guide for pet buyers who are looking for a healthy,
responsibly-bred, well-bred kitten.  Look at the breeder interview
section and honestly consider what your answers to that hypothetical
buyer would be and whether or not they'd be 'correct' answers
Orchid - 07 Mar 2005 01:26 GMT
>I too used to be appalled at the age of kittens being sold in this state.
>>However, I learned the hard way -- six weeks old is the standard, period!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Considering how unpleasant so many people have been I don't think I want to
>say what state this is.

    I was simply curious because I don't know of any states where
it is *legal* to sell an animal before the age of 8 weeks old.
Perhaps you could privately email me?

>I learned the hard way by looking at what others
>were doing (the age at which their kittens were typically sold) and not
>agreeing with it -- so I did not market any of my kittens until they were
>significantly older than the age at which others were selling and/or
>placing their kittens.

    Why were you breeding litters without homes lined up?  Every
responsible breeder I know generally has waiting lists, not the other
way around.

> After awhile I tried it myself --
>placing kittens younger and it went great until just recently. I do not
>place 6 week olds though.

    I would be inclined to say that if you can't place kittens at
an appropriate age, you might want to reconsider the number of litters
you are producing.  Placing kittens at 8 weeks or below significantly
impacts their chances of staying in one home for their whole lives --
there have been studies regarding this.

>    How many breeds do you have?  I'd think that the cost of PKD
>testing, HCM testing, and FHD testing on the Persians alone would be
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>covers both Feline Leukemia and Kitty HIV (as I put it to clients so they
>will understand).

    Yes, but what about testing for HCM, PKD, and FHD?
Considering those are major genetic health problems in at least three
of the breeds you list (and HCM is a problem that should be tested for
in all breeding cats) you should be testing for them.  Why aren't you?

>I have a number of breeds but not that many cats per
>catagory. Specifically I have the following: Persian, Manx, Maincoon,
>Siamese, Russian Blue. (I have two RB total).

Orchid
See Orchid's Kitties! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/bengalpage
Want a Purebred Cat?  Read This! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/orchid
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Mar 2005 04:18 GMT
Orchid,

What's a "Maine Coon outcross" anyway? The outcross part I mean?

Doesn't any else find it peculiar that she sells with no contract? Does
this mean she sells whole kittens with no spay/neuter agreement? Or
declaw provison?

Do you find it peculiar that she's breeding and selling FIVE different
breeds? The only breeders that could be called "responsible", or as
close to that as I'm willing to compromise, claim they breed for the
love of the breed. They're very well educated on their particular
breed, and very knowledgeable about the genetics of the breed. Five
different breeds just sounds to me like she's trying to make money off
of selling kittens, period.

Sherry
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Mar 2005 04:10 GMT
Nightshade wroe:
<< I would place my kittens at between 12 and 14 weeks.
The clients and/or buyers would then reward me by insisting that they
wanted a kitten not a teenage or older cat. I would explain to them all

that I have been told on this site and much more and the clients would
not
get it. I would refer my clients to my cats books and my vet for
informatio
and my clients did not care. They wanted a "kitten." The clients would
then
go elsewhere (buying kittens between the ages of 6-8 weeks) and my
kittens
were not being placed. <<

Clarification: You mean your kittens weren't being *sold*. And you let
the almighty dollar dictate the age to sell them.  That tells us your
motives, not what's best for the kitten.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 03:08 GMT
As for the 'blood test', I am assuming that's a titre test, which is
not always accurate in such a young kitten.  Why didn't you send the
kitten's shot records home with it?  Responsible breeders keep a
mini-medical record for each kitten, including the labels from the
vaccines given.
I did send the shot record with the kitten. The problem was that the buyer
insisted their vet ran some kind of blood test on the kitten and stated
that the kitten had not received any vaccine. The kitten had had his first
shot at six weeks of age -- the eariest age, according to my vet, that a
kitten can get a first shot.

It really freaked me out that the buyer's vet made so many statements about
the kitten that were not true -- the kitten was seven weeks old and the
kitten had received a first vaccine. I was totally confused about how on
earth a vet could make the drastically inaccurate statements the buyer said
their vet made. I have never in my life experienced anything like this.
Ashley Collard - 06 Mar 2005 00:28 GMT
okay..where to begin....I think it is rude and arrogant to chew people out
on web forums...we all make mistakes and have to learn from them. At one
time or another all breeders had to start their cattery and make there own
mistakes. My advice is that you write this kitten off as a mistake. Write
up a sales contract and use it for all future sales. email me and I can
give you an example of a great contract (collardak@charter.net) Get all
your payments in full before the kitten is allowed to leave. I know you
said this was a crazy time for you and weird circumstance but try to get
payment or you never will. Keep vet records on ALL animals. Take an
evening...get online and really research what having a cattery requires.
You may learn its not for you, you dont have the time or how you can
improve your cattery. I wish you all the luck in your endeavors. I breed
sphynx cats and while we have had a few learning mistakes along the way we
learn from them and move on.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 01:42 GMT
Hi there,
I will be using a contract from now on believe me! However, thanks for the
offer to let me see one of yours. I'll email you as soon as I figure out
how to get that information off of this forum. As for basically writing
this kitten off (i.e. in regards to the payment) -- I know, that's what I
plan to do. I was just really freaked out when I wrote my initial post
because I've never had a problem like this. Moreover, I've never let a
kitten go without full payment before and I never will again. About
receiving info on how to better run my little cattery, that sounds good to
me! Though I've been at this for a number of years now (I've spent a ton of
money on blood tests and other related health care -- stool tests on adult
cats just to make sure there were no worms, medications, xrays, etc.) and
have already learned a ton from the cattery owners who got me started and
from my vet. Still I'm sure some more education would be a truly wonderful
thing!
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 01:54 GMT
> okay..where to begin....I think it is rude and arrogant to chew people out
> on web forums...we all make mistakes and have to learn from them. At one
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> sphynx cats and while we have had a few learning mistakes along the way we
> learn from them and move on.

You are going directly to hell when you die. You will not
get to pass Go. You will not get to collect your $200.
May your life be hellish too. Breeding is evil.
Sereena Nightshade - 06 Mar 2005 02:55 GMT
If breeding from tested stock is always totally evil and everyone who does
it goes to Hell then there will certainly be a lot of people in Hell.

If breeding is always evil and every cat on the planet is altered and never
produces a litter then there will eventually be no more cats.

If you believe that I was going to collect $200 from the above discussed
kitten then you are incorrect.
Mary - 06 Mar 2005 05:58 GMT
> If breeding from tested stock is always totally evil and everyone who does
> it goes to Hell then there will certainly be a lot of people in Hell.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If you believe that I was going to collect $200 from the above discussed
> kitten then you are incorrect.

What goes around comes around. Surely you have some skills
with which you might make a living instead of abusing helpless
animals. You already have a great name for a porn actress.
Maybe that is your calling. Think about it.
Sereena Nightshade - 07 Mar 2005 00:23 GMT
Mary, regarding your post: "What goes around comes around. Surely you have
some skills with which you might make a living instead of abusing helpless
animals. You already have a great name for a porn actress.
Maybe that is your calling. Think about it." That's a pretty lame and
uninformed comment, don't you think? After all, you don't even know me. You
have not seen me or my animals. You haven't seen anything whatsoever except
for what is on this site, which cannot be considered a full dose of any
reality. In any case, if what comes around goes around there is a Hell
storm waiting for a ton of people and you are probably one of them. Hmmm,
something about glass houses and how it isn't wise to throw stones comes to
mind. I'm sure you're not perfect. What's in your closet that you'd never
admit to anyone? Or are you just in denial?