Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"fat" cat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ken - 25 Jan 2005 14:23 GMT
We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.

A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?
B- How can we control the male's weight since they are fed at the same
time?

They both have free access to the whole house and it would be difficult
to keep one on a locked room while the other one ate.
any ideas?

Thanks

Ken
Victor Martinez - 25 Jan 2005 14:32 GMT
> A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?

It depends. You need to look at the cat, is it a large cat or is it a
fat cat?

> B- How can we control the male's weight since they are fed at the same
> time?

What do you feed them? Try feeding mostly wet (canned/tinned) food, it
is more nutritious than dry food.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Justin L - 25 Jan 2005 16:25 GMT
<snip>

> What do you feed them? Try feeding mostly wet (canned/tinned) food, it
> is more nutritious than dry food.

Is this true?

I have heard / read from a few sources that dry food is supposed to be
better for kittens.

*so confused*

Justin
Karen - 25 Jan 2005 16:52 GMT
> <snip>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Justin

The vet world is slowly coming to realize that dry is NOT the best choice,
especially for males who can develop crystals in the urine which could be
life threatening for them. Honest to God, if I ever get kittens again I will
NOT get them started on dry.
Howard Berkowitz - 25 Jan 2005 18:07 GMT
> > <snip>
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> will
> NOT get them started on dry.

Have you any idea why cats seem to get addicted to dry food, to the
point that I receive urgent messages when any part of the bottom of the
bowl is exposed?  I'd think it would be counter-instinctive, since it
would be so different than the normal mean of a carnivore.
Karen Chuplis - 25 Jan 2005 18:17 GMT
>>> <snip>
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> bowl is exposed?  I'd think it would be counter-instinctive, since it
> would be so different than the normal mean of a carnivore.

I would suspect it is something like we humans with carbs. There is no doubt
that when you do the first two weeks of the South Beach diet and have only
veggies for your carbs, you lose the craving for complex carbs of bread and
sweets. Dry food has a lot of filler in it that consists of carbs.
Jean Hobbs - 26 Jan 2005 10:53 GMT
I have a problem with dry food that I have been going to bring up here
Wilson would live on dry food if I let him but sometimes I dont put *any*
down,in an effort to make him eat wet food ,some days he'll eat nothing
other days just a nibble he's even started to knock back his fresh meat at
tea-time, I get him beef, and veal sandwich steak or lamb fillets, and he's
certainly not sick just stubborn about what he wants to eat, he'll eat dry
food any time at all though     Jean.P.

Howard Berkowitz <hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote in message news:hcb-
468EFA.13071025012005@news-central.giganews.com...

> > > <snip>
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> bowl is exposed?  I'd think it would be counter-instinctive, since it
> would be so different than the normal mean of a carnivore.
M.C. Mullen - 26 Jan 2005 11:52 GMT
|I have a problem with dry food that I have been going to bring up here
| Wilson would live on dry food if I let him but sometimes I dont put *any*
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
| certainly not sick just stubborn about what he wants to eat, he'll eat dry
| food any time at all though     Jean.P.

As long as he drinks plenty he should be fine.
My tom only wants meat in jelly though, the rest he leaves aside, especially
p?t?.

How old is your cat?

Carola
Zathras - 27 Jan 2005 00:43 GMT
>The vet world is slowly coming to realize that dry is NOT the best choice,
>especially for males who can develop crystals in the urine which could be
>life threatening for them. Honest to God, if I ever get kittens again I will
>NOT get them started on dry.

Are there articles online that discuss this?  I'd like to do some
further reading on it.  My kittens eat dry food exclusively.
Karen Chuplis - 27 Jan 2005 01:50 GMT
>> The vet world is slowly coming to realize that dry is NOT the best choice,
>> especially for males who can develop crystals in the urine which could be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there articles online that discuss this?  I'd like to do some
> further reading on it.  My kittens eat dry food exclusively.

Well, you can start here:

http://www.littlebigcat.com/index.php?action=library&act=show&item=whycatsne
edcannedfood
Zathras - 29 Jan 2005 03:26 GMT
>> Are there articles online that discuss this?  I'd like to do some
>> further reading on it.  My kittens eat dry food exclusively.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>http://www.littlebigcat.com/index.php?action=library&act=show&item=whycatsne
>edcannedfood

Thank you.   I will start reading up on this topic.
badwilson - 27 Jan 2005 14:20 GMT
> > <snip>
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> life threatening for them. Honest to God, if I ever get kittens again I will
> NOT get them started on dry.

When we first got Vino we only fed him dry.  Didn't want to bother
with wet and didn't know about it really.  Then I started feeding him
a little bit of Fancy Feast as a treat.  He loved it and began to bug
me for it in the mornings.  I started giving it to him every morning
and pretty soon it was every evening too.  Then I figured I should
feed him something better than Fancy Feast, because I was feeding him
Iams dry.  So I started feeding him Iams canned twice a day while
still leaving dry out all the time.  Now he begs and begs for the wet
and only eats the dry between meals as emergency rations.  He also
gets some Science Diet and Nutro canned and occasionally some Whiskas
pouches because they are the only thing I can get here and I have to
stretch out my "import" food.
If it was up to Vino, he would never touch dry again.
--
Britta
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr. I have an alarm clock that's
covered in fur!
Check out pictures of Vino at:
http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album
catwalker63 - 28 Jan 2005 21:12 GMT
> Check out pictures of Vino at:
> http://photos.yahoo.com/badwilson click on the Vino album

Beautiful cat!  Great pictures!

Signature

Catwalker
aka Pu$$y Feet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chauncey, Silver Tabby Persion
Bubba, Black & White Short Hair
Bandit, Seal Point Himalayan
Midge, Grey & White Medium Hair
Chigger, Seal Point Siamese mix
Killer, Beta

Victor Martinez - 25 Jan 2005 19:01 GMT
> I have heard / read from a few sources that dry food is supposed to be
> better for kittens.

Think about it. Cats are obligate carnivores. They have zero
requirements for carbohydrates. What are some of the main ingredients of
dry food? Grains. Why are you feedling corn or rice to a carnivore? ;-)
The dry food is better thing came to be because supposedly chewing on
kibble cleans tartar buildup. Unfortunately, most cats are really bad
chewers and end up swallowing kibble almost full, so the cleaning effect
of kibble is not significant.
This noted, I do feed my cats a kibble mix. They get canned food twice a
day and then they get kibble to snack on throughout the day. They get
most of their nourishment from the canned food, so I'm happy and they
have a large variety in their diet, which makes them happy. :)

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Ted Davis - 25 Jan 2005 21:48 GMT
>> I have heard / read from a few sources that dry food is supposed to be
>> better for kittens.
>
>Think about it. Cats are obligate carnivores. They have zero
>requirements for carbohydrates. What are some of the main ingredients of
>dry food? Grains. Why are you feedling corn or rice to a carnivore? ;-)

That's misleading: cats naturally eat small animals - the entire
animal, including the contents of the digestive system (some don't eat
mouse heads), and their prey animals eat mostly carbohydrates.  A
significant percentage of the diet of wild cats is carbohydrates.

Also, many cats have a taste for fruits - usually specific fruits and
not the same ones for all that eat fruit (25% of mine *love*
watermelon; one likes pear juice, but not pears; none like apples or
bananas).

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
SPAM filter: Messages to this address *must* contain "T.E.D."
somewhere in the body or they will be automatically rejected.
Victor Martinez - 25 Jan 2005 21:53 GMT
> mouse heads), and their prey animals eat mostly carbohydrates.  A
> significant percentage of the diet of wild cats is carbohydrates.

Not unless you think 5-6% is significant.

> Also, many cats have a taste for fruits - usually specific fruits and
> not the same ones for all that eat fruit (25% of mine *love*
> watermelon; one likes pear juice, but not pears; none like apples or

And some of mine love broccoli, but that doesn't mean it's part of their
natural diet.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

catwalker63 - 25 Jan 2005 22:47 GMT
I have one that likes potato chips and french fries.  I have to be very
careful if I have them myself, or he'll steal them right out of my hand!  
Another likes herbs, especially mint and cilantro.  There are two that
lick plastic bags (what's up with that?).  There's no telling what a cat
will decide to eat if left to make his/her own decisions.  Hopefully we
can help them make better choices.  :)

Signature

Catwalker
aka Pu$$y Feet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chauncey, Silver Tabby Persion
Bubba, Black & White Short Hair
Bandit, Seal Point Himalayan
Midge, Grey & White Medium Hair
Chigger, Seal Point Siamese mix
Killer, Beta

Ted Davis - 26 Jan 2005 01:43 GMT
>> mouse heads), and their prey animals eat mostly carbohydrates.  A
>> significant percentage of the diet of wild cats is carbohydrates.
>
>Not unless you think 5-6% is significant.

It's certainly well beyond the level of minor nutrients.

>> Also, many cats have a taste for fruits - usually specific fruits and
>> not the same ones for all that eat fruit (25% of mine *love*
>> watermelon; one likes pear juice, but not pears; none like apples or
>
>And some of mine love broccoli, but that doesn't mean it's part of their
>natural diet.

Depends on what you mean by natural.  I read somewhere that one of the
few differences between the African Wild Cat and modern domestic cats
is that the modern cats have a digestive system modified in the
direction of less specialized diets, that is, in the direction of
improved carbohydrate digestion.  And of course almost any animal can
absorb simple sugars, which explains why so many carnivores also eat
fruit, and most anything else they can swallow that they think they
can digest - much dietary specialization is learned: animals eat what
they can catch or gather, and thrive on.

Signature

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)

catwalker63 - 26 Jan 2005 02:16 GMT
> And of course almost any animal can absorb simple sugars, which
> explains why so many carnivores also eat fruit, and most anything else
> they can swallow that they think they can digest - much dietary
> specialization is learned: animals eat what they can catch or gather,
> and thrive on.

Or whatever will cause the most trouble.  We had one when I was younger
who would get up on the table and lick the top of the butter if you
turned your back.

Signature

Catwalker
aka Pu$$y Feet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chauncey, Silver Tabby Persion
Bubba, Black & White Short Hair
Bandit, Seal Point Himalayan
Midge, Grey & White Medium Hair
Chigger, Seal Point Siamese mix
Killer, Beta

Victor Martinez - 26 Jan 2005 03:12 GMT
> Depends on what you mean by natural.  I read somewhere that one of the
> few differences between the African Wild Cat and modern domestic cats
> is that the modern cats have a digestive system modified in the
> direction of less specialized diets, that is, in the direction of
> improved carbohydrate digestion.  And of course almost any animal can

Really? Are you trying to tell us that the digestive system of the cat
evolved in a couple of thousand years? Do you have any idea how
ridiculous that is?

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Ted Davis - 26 Jan 2005 13:54 GMT
>> Depends on what you mean by natural.  I read somewhere that one of the
>> few differences between the African Wild Cat and modern domestic cats
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>evolved in a couple of thousand years? Do you have any idea how
>ridiculous that is?

I take it you have absolutely no understanding of animal breeding or
of evolution by natural selection.

That 'couple of thousand years' is *much* longer than that - more like
4000 years, and for cats, that is almost 4000 generations.  In
evolutionary terms, that is long enough for significant changes -
modern humans are not much more than 4000 generations removed from the
quite different pre-modern humans.  In some domesticated animals
(cows, dogs), drastic changes have been brought about by artifical
breeding in a small fraction of that number of generations.

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
SPAM filter: Messages to this address *must* contain "T.E.D."
somewhere in the body or they will be automatically rejected.
Victor Martinez - 26 Jan 2005 14:32 GMT
> I take it you have absolutely no understanding of animal breeding or
> of evolution by natural selection.

I'm not an expert, but I am a scientist and understand the basic
concepts of evolution.

> That 'couple of thousand years' is *much* longer than that - more like
> 4000 years, and for cats, that is almost 4000 generations.  In
> evolutionary terms, that is long enough for significant changes -

In evolutionary terms, 4000 generations is not significant. Evolution
takes hundreds of thousands of years to happen.

> modern humans are not much more than 4000 generations removed from the
> quite different pre-modern humans.  In some domesticated animals

Really? According to my research, the first modern humans appeared in
the Holocene Epoch, about 8,000 years ago while the Neanderthals (the
most recent hominid group) appeared in the Pleistocene Epoch, 1.8
*million* years ago. 4000 generations is around 80,000 years and we're
talking of 1 million years. Quite a difference if you ask me. :)

> (cows, dogs), drastic changes have been brought about by artifical
> breeding in a small fraction of that number of generations.

And you must understand the difference between natural and artificial
selection, right?

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

Ted Davis - 26 Jan 2005 21:56 GMT
>> I take it you have absolutely no understanding of animal breeding or
>> of evolution by natural selection.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>In evolutionary terms, 4000 generations is not significant. Evolution
>takes hundreds of thousands of years to happen.

That's not even close to true - bacteria can evolve new traits in
weeks or even days (a few hundred generations): it is definitely more
an issue of number of opportunities to remix genes and for
modifications to be transmitted - both of which are related to
reproductive rate, than to arbitrary time scales that have nothing to
do with the life cycles of the organism involved.

>> modern humans are not much more than 4000 generations removed from the
>> quite different pre-modern humans.  In some domesticated animals
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>*million* years ago. 4000 generations is around 80,000 years and we're
>talking of 1 million years. Quite a difference if you ask me. :)

Interesting, since anatomically modern man has been in Australia for
at least 50 000 years (some evidence points to 75 000 - 100 000 years
BP) and in the Americas for at least 12 000 years.

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
SPAM filter: Messages to this address *must* contain "T.E.D."
somewhere in the body or they will be automatically rejected.
Victor Martinez - 26 Jan 2005 22:54 GMT
> That's not even close to true - bacteria can evolve new traits in

I was under the impression we were discussing mammals, not bacteria.

Signature

Victor M. Martinez
Owned and operated by the Fantastic Seven (TM)
Send your spam here: uce@ftc.gov
Email me here: pistorLITTER@BOXaustin.rr.com

BC - 26 Jan 2005 17:10 GMT
>>>Depends on what you mean by natural.  I read somewhere that one of the
>>>few differences between the African Wild Cat and modern domestic cats
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> (cows, dogs), drastic changes have been brought about by artifical
> breeding in a small fraction of that number of generations.

In horses their ability to absorb foods depends on the bacteria in their
gut, therefore you have to introduce different foods gradually so that
the bacteria has time to adjust to the new type of food, so that it can
be absorbed rather than pass right through.  I am only guessing but as
cats also seem to get diarrhoea easily when changing foods do their
stomachs also work in a similar way?  This would go a little way in
explaining why wild cats and domestic cats can eat different types of
food.  Rather than their digestive system having actually evolved
perhaps the bacteria inside has adjusted itself to be able to absorb
different foods?

Just a guess and probably wrong!!!

> T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
> SPAM filter: Messages to this address *must* contain "T.E.D."
> somewhere in the body or they will be automatically rejected.

Signature

Badger Badger Badger

Monique Y. Mudama - 26 Jan 2005 18:15 GMT
["Followup-To:" header set to rec.pets.cats.anecdotes.] On 2005-01-26, BC
penned:

> In horses their ability to absorb foods depends on the bacteria in their
> gut, therefore you have to introduce different foods gradually so that the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Just a guess and probably wrong!!!

Makes sense to me.  If I haven't eaten beef for a while, it will upset my
stomach.

Signature

monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eros was adopted!  Eros has a home now!  *cheer!*

rpl - 25 Jan 2005 14:37 GMT
> We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
> pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
>
> A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?

depends... is it fat or muscle?

Time to get buddy neutered, btw; just ask the vet.

pat
BudGan - 25 Jan 2005 16:38 GMT
>> We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
>> pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
>>
>> A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?
>
> depends... is it fat or muscle?

Good point. I have 2 four year olds who are both in perfect physical
shape and roughly the same size.  One weighs 13 lbs. and the other
weighs 9 lbs.  I think breed has a lot to do with it.  The heavier one
is part Bombay and they are known to be "bricks wrapped in solk" for
their body density.
jacquie0 - 25 Jan 2005 14:41 GMT
> We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
> pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ken

Ken,

Have you spoken to you vet about this matter? If not, I suggest that you
do so. It could be something medical, such as a thyroid problem. If you
have spoken to them, what do they suggest? Whenever I am in doubt of
something dealing with my cats, I will call my vet and ask them. Most
vets will give you a bit of free advice over the phone. If they for some
reason don't give any free advice over the phone, I would recommend
going to another vet. Good luck with you two little furry friends.
Jodie - 25 Jan 2005 17:43 GMT
an easy-to-read article

FEEDING YOUR CAT: KNOW THE BASICS OF FELINE NUTRITION
Dr. Lisa A. Pierson, DVM
http://www.catsincanada.com/articles/feeding.html

someone posted this last year, and I have great faith in it now.  I feed my
cat mostly wet food now, with access to dry.  Before I fed her less wet, so
she'd eat more dry food, which turns out not to be so good.  She has not
gained weight, and her coat is much silkier.

--
___________________
Jodie
jodie75@sympatico.ca

> > We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
> > pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> reason don't give any free advice over the phone, I would recommend
> going to another vet. Good luck with you two little furry friends.
CatNipped - 25 Jan 2005 15:20 GMT
> We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
> pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Ken

This may or may not be "too fat".  It depends on the kitten - Sammy weighed
that much at 6 months (at 9 months she now weights 15 pounds - she clearly
has Maine Coon ancestry), but she's the correct weight for her size (she's
about 3 1/2 to 4 feet long from nose to tail tip).  A quick rule of thumb -
you should not be able to see a cat's ribs or back bone (too thin), but you
*should* be able to easily feel a cat's ribs with your hands.  I'd check
with your vet if you're not sure.

Hugs,

CatNipped
Dik F. Liu - 25 Jan 2005 16:30 GMT
>A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?
>B- How can we control the male's weight since they are fed at the same
>time?

It's hard to tell without seeing the cat. Some cats are naturally larger, some
just fat.  12 lbs for a 6-month old male does sound excessive. Can you at all
feel the cat's ribs? If not, he is most likely overweight. But the best person
to judge if your cat is fat, is your vet.

Dik
M.C. Mullen - 25 Jan 2005 18:04 GMT
| We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
| pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
|
| Ken

My vet friend says that one may stuff a kitten until it's one year old
because it has to grow.
Males *are* heavier than females.
After a lot of research I have come to the conclusion that dry food
available all day round and wet food served once or twice a day
(morning/evening) is the best solution. Evening is better if you feed once a
day because it prevents the cats from waking you up in the middle of the
night or early morning.
My cats (grown up) eat 100 grams of wet food each every day but some like
200g per day.

Carola
Zathras - 27 Jan 2005 00:47 GMT
>We have 2 kittens, not quite 6 months old..The female weighs about 7
>pounds; but the male weighs 12 pounds.
>
>A - Is this too mch for a 6-month male to weigh?
>B- How can we control the male's weight since they are fed at the same
>time?

My two kittens are about the same age as yours, and I was wondering
the exact same thing, 'cause I've got the exact same situation.  Maybe
it's just normal.  I can still feel his ribs without much trouble, so
I don't think he could be classified as overweight right now, but he's
really trying to get there.  The other seems to barely eat and is
skinny, but it seems like she's getting enough nutrition, if barely.
Lesley Madigan - 07 Feb 2005 13:43 GMT
The other seems to barely eat and is
> skinny, but it seems like she's getting enough nutrition, if barely.

Or perhaps she's a hollow kitty. Sarrasine has an enormous apetitte
but looks smaller and slimmer than Redunzel. We had the same thing
with Isis and Fugazi, Isis had to be hollow inside to have shoved away
that much food without getting fat. Sarrasine is perfectly healthy as
was Isis it's just the annoying way some cats are. Able to stuff their
faces and not put an ounce on!

Lesley

Slave to the Fabulous Furballs
M.C. Mullen - 07 Feb 2005 15:48 GMT
| The other seems to barely eat and is
| > skinny, but it seems like she's getting enough nutrition, if barely.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
|
| Slave to the Fabulous Furballs

How did your cats get such extraordinary names?

Carola
Lesley Madigan - 09 Feb 2005 11:02 GMT
> How did your cats get such extraordinary names?
>
> Carola

Carola

The names of my  cats...well my first cat was Speedy Joe but he was
named by someone else.

Isis isn't that unusual a name for a cat- I am sure I've seen a couple
more Isis's on here. From the Egyptian "top Goddess" as if Isis would
have been anything but top of everything....... She was named by the
SO when he saw her sitting like an Egyptian cat statue

Fugazi is Vietnamese for "Chaos". Believe me it suited a cat who
couldn't get her head around the idea that cats as supposed to be
graceful and silent

Redunzel is actually spelt RDNZL but people always ask me how to
pronouce it so these days I type it as its said. The story is Frank
Zappa gave this name to a small black kitten but when his son (who was
about 3 at the time) saw said kitten in action, his son christened the
kitten "Fightey-Bitey" and the kitten kept that name for the rest of a
long life. The name RDNZL was then used for an instrumental inspired
by the kitten bouncing and tumbling about and my SO chose the name
because she did bounce and tumble (still does actually)

Sarrasine is the title of a Balzac short story but a friend of mine
who's seriously into medieval languages tells me that its  a
corruption of "sarrasin" (Medieval French) which comes from "Saracen"
and simply means "A dark skinned person" and she is black and very
definately a person

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
Mary - 09 Feb 2005 17:47 GMT
> Redunzel is actually spelt RDNZL but people always ask me how to
> pronouce it so these days I type it as its said. The story is Frank
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> by the kitten bouncing and tumbling about and my SO chose the name
> because she did bounce and tumble (still does actually)

Zappa was known by his family as The Man Who
Names Things. :)
Mike Z. Helm - 08 Feb 2005 05:25 GMT
On 7 Feb 2005 05:43:04 -0800, LMadigan@hhnt.nhs.uk (Lesley Madigan)

>The other seems to barely eat and is
>> skinny, but it seems like she's getting enough nutrition, if barely.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>was Isis it's just the annoying way some cats are. Able to stuff their
>faces and not put an ounce on!

just like some people - go figure, eh?

>Lesley
>
>Slave to the Fabulous Furballs
Lesley Madigan - 10 Feb 2005 10:49 GMT
> >Or perhaps she's a hollow kitty. Sarrasine has an enormous apetitte
> >but looks smaller and slimmer than Redunzel. We had the same thing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> just like some people - go figure, eh?

Its unfair! I swear that cat(Sarrasine) eats like a medium sized pony
and she's tiny! The day we got her, her first reaction to her new home
was to hide in the carrier and refuse to come out then gradually this
little head peeped out of the carrier. she looked round and
triangulated where the food was, bolted to the dish, ate 2 kitten
pouches and half a tin of food without stopping, then burped loudly
and returned to the box for a well earned well stuffed snooze....

Lesley

Slave to the Fabulous Furballs
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.