Another precedence being set? I think so, and I think it is about
time. Pets no longer being considered as chattel? It is how it
should be. The vet bills are high enough to rival those of human
patients; they should be treated the same.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-71lucky,0,2637
905.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines
"The owners of Lucky the dog will have their day in court after a
Broward judge ruled Tuesday they are entitled to sue a veterinarian
for malpractice and even allege emotional distress caused by their
pet's death."
--
Cheryl
Karen Chuplis - 08 Jul 2003 00:51 GMT
> Another precedence being set? I think so, and I think it is about
> time. Pets no longer being considered as chattel? It is how it
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> --
> Cheryl
I saw a piece about this. I'm glad they have some recourse.
Karen
Mary - 08 Jul 2003 01:12 GMT
>Another precedence being set? I think so, and I think it is about
>time.
I think it's a good thing. We and the animals do suffer greatly when there is
malpractice. I know my cat and I suffered greatly when he was left untreated in
a vet hospital and died of gangrene. I sued and only got vet bills and other
costs of my own. Maybe the sloppy vets will be more careful. Of course vet
costs will now go up because of increased malpractice insurance. There may also
be some losers who abuse the system.