 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / General Topics / February 2004Cat Abuse Call to Action -- WARNING -- horrible
http://www.fox5ny.com/ Before you read this, know that it contains very upsetting, horrible information about cat abuse. If you can stand it, read it, and send letters to the company that hired these subhumans demanding that they be fired, or whatever else you can think of to do. I think they shoud get what they gave, but that's just my opinion. (12/30/03 - Atlantic City) ? Two cable television workers are suspended due to charges they dragged a cat to death. Robert Hewitt Junior and Joseph Newton face animal-cruelty charges for allegedly tying a cat to the bumper of their company truck and dragging it along the road at a high rate of speed. An Atlantic City police sergeant was on his way to work when he saw the cat being dragged behind the truck in Absecon a week ago. Another Ocean Cable Group truck followed it. The sergeant alerted authorities, who stopped the trucks. Hewitt, who was driving the lead truck, also is charged with inhumane treatment of an animal. Hewitt's and Newton's boss says they'll be fired if they're convicted.  Signaturenimue "...but I want you to know I did save you... not when it counted of course, but after that. Every night after that...every night I save you." Spike to Buffy After Life Gosh, when Spike says heartfelt, sincere things like that -- things straight from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy about him, doesn't it? That is so cruel and sad. It makes me ashamed to be human when you hear what some people do to animals and each other. > http://www.fox5ny.com/ > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > (12/30/03 - Atlantic City) - Two cable television workers are suspended due > to charges they dragged a cat to death. Robert Hewitt Junior and Joseph > Newton face animal-cruelty charges for allegedly tying a cat to the bumper [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy > about him, doesn't it? >http://www.fox5ny.com/ Where on this link is this story? The only thing remotely related to animals is the score of the hockey game. >(12/30/03 - Atlantic City) Two cable television workers are suspended due >to charges they dragged a cat to death. Robert Hewitt Junior and Joseph [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >the cat being dragged behind the truck in Absecon a week ago. Another Ocean >Cable Group truck followed it. If this is related to the link the first question I would have to ask is are these people employees of the cable system (Ocean?) or are they citizens that were granted access to the facilities through the Local Access provisions of the cable licensing? Around here there was a problem with cable programmig and it turned out the cable operator could do nothing to stop the program because it was aired through community access provisions. Also if these people work for the cable system were they on work time or on their own time? BTW, if you go to archives you'll find the article under Tuesday Dec. 30th. -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. >> http://www.fox5ny.com/ > Where on this link is this story? The only thing remotely related to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> truck followed it. > If this is related to the link the first question No, of course it isn't. I just included a story that has absolutely nothing to do with the link or what I put in the subject line. Jaysus! What do you think? This is what I found at the link -- duh. >I would > have to ask is are these people employees of > the cable system (Ocean?) or are they citizens that > were granted access to the facilities through the Local Access > provisions of the cable licensing? I don't see why a non-employee citizen would have access to a company TRUCK. To a cable channel -- yes. To a company truck -- no. They are obviously employees. That's also why the article mentions that the company might fire them. If they weren't employees, they couldn't do that -- I guess I need to explain that to you. > Around here there was a problem with cable programmig and > it turned out the cable operator could do nothing to stop > the program because it was aired through community > access provisions. So? > Also if these people work for the cable system were they > on work time or on their own time? Again -- company truck. If you are in the company truck, I would assume you are on company time. > BTW, if you go to archives you'll find the article under Tuesday Dec. > 30th. That's the date I included in the OP. > -------------------------------------------- > "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." > -------------------------Carter on Stargate > > To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from > my e-mail address. Signaturenimue "...but I want you to know I did save you... not when it counted of course, but after that. Every night after that...every night I save you." Spike to Buffy After Life Gosh, when Spike says heartfelt, sincere things like that -- things straight from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy about him, doesn't it? >No, of course it isn't. I just included a story that has absolutely nothing >to do with the link or what I put in the subject line. Jaysus! What do you >think? This is what I found at the link -- duh. As I said the link didn't work. You wouldn't be the first one to put an article in your post that absolutely nothing to do with the link. >I don't see why a non-employee citizen would have access to a company TRUCK. >To a cable channel -- yes. To a company truck -- no. They are obviously >employees. That's also why the article mentions that the company might >fire them. If they weren't employees, they couldn't do that -- I guess I >need to explain that to you. Here is a clue: around here law requires cable opertors to provide air time/equipment/facilities to people who want to provide programming under "community access." Around here that includes access to cable cameras, sound equipment, vehicles, etc. >Again -- company truck. If you are in the company truck, I would assume you >are on company time. Not necessarily. Around it could mean someone lives in the community, not necessarily that they work for cable. -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. >> No, of course it isn't. I just included a story that has absolutely >> nothing to do with the link or what I put in the subject line. >> Jaysus! What do you think? This is what I found at the link -- duh. > As I said the link didn't work. You wouldn't be the first one to put > an article in your post that absolutely nothing to do with the link. I can't imagine why I or anyone would do that -- especially when the topic of the article was clearly stated in the subject line. Common sense should have told you that the article in my post was all about what I described in the subject line. >> I don't see why a non-employee citizen would have access to a >> company TRUCK. To a cable channel -- yes. To a company truck -- no. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Not necessarily. Around it could mean someone lives in the community, > not necessarily that they work for cable. Well, did this confuse you? <The sergeant alerted authorities, who stopped the trucks. Hewitt, who was driving the lead truck, also is charged with inhumane treatment of an animal. Hewitt's and Newton's boss says they'll be fired if they're convicted.>> It seems clear to me that the boss who will fire them is the cable company. They killed that cat with company property on company time, making the company look really bad. If they just had a local cable access show and worked at Burger King, why on earth would their BK boss threaten to fire them for killing a cat on their own free time? Why would their boss even be mentioned or consulted for the article unless the boss had some connection to the crime? These people clearly work for the cable company, and they involved the company in their crime. I can't believe you need this explained. The people who did this should suffer horribly for their crime. You need to learn how to think. > -------------------------------------------- > "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." > -------------------------Carter on Stargate > > To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from > my e-mail address. Signaturenimue "...but I want you to know I did save you... not when it counted of course, but after that. Every night after that...every night I save you." Spike to Buffy After Life Gosh, when Spike says heartfelt, sincere things like that -- things straight from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy about him, doesn't it? >I can't imagine why I or anyone would do that -- especially when the topic >of the article was clearly stated in the subject line. Common sense should >have told you that the article in my post was all about what I described in >the subject line. Then you haven't been on usenet and dealt with trolls for very long. >Well, did this confuse you? <The sergeant alerted authorities, who stopped >the trucks. Hewitt, who was >driving the lead truck, also is charged with inhumane treatment of an >animal. Hewitt's and Newton's boss says they'll be fired if they're >convicted.>> Just because he was driving the truck doesn't mean he worked for cable. Under community access provisions in the law the driver may be a citizen in that town/city. Go read up on community access programming on cable systems. -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. >> I can't imagine why I or anyone would do that -- especially when the >> topic of the article was clearly stated in the subject line. Common >> sense should have told you that the article in my post was all about >> what I described in the subject line. > Then you haven't been on usenet and dealt with trolls for very long. I've been on usenet a long time -- long enough to have seen your name many times before. You should know by now that I am not a troll. >> Well, did this confuse you? <The sergeant alerted authorities, who >> stopped the trucks. Hewitt, who was [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Just because he was driving the truck doesn't mean he worked for > cable. Well, how else could they be fired by the cable company if they didn't work for the cable company? >Under community access provisions in the law the > driver may be a citizen in that town/city. > > Go read up on community access programming on cable systems. I am not assuming the men worked for the cable company merely because they drove the truck. I am assuming they worked for the cable company because their boss threatened to fire them if they were found guilty. The inclusion of that fact in this article indicates that they are employees of the cable company -- how else could the cable company fire them? > -------------------------------------------- > "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." > -------------------------Carter on Stargate > > To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from > my e-mail address. Signaturenimue "...but I want you to know I did save you... not when it counted of course, but after that. Every night after that...every night I save you." Spike to Buffy After Life Gosh, when Spike says heartfelt, sincere things like that -- things straight from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy about him, doesn't it? >I've been on usenet a long time -- long enough to have seen your name many >times before. You should know by now that I am not a troll. I don't know you from Adam, have no idea if you are a troll or not. >Well, how else could they be fired by the cable company if they didn't work >for the cable company? Where did you see they were fired? All the news accounts I saw said nothing about them being fired. >I am not assuming the men worked for the cable company merely because they >drove the truck. I am assuming they worked for the cable company because >their boss threatened to fire them if they were found guilty. The inclusion >of that fact in this article indicates that they are employees of the cable >company -- how else could the cable company fire them? And firing them doesn't necessarily mean they were paid by the cable system, they could have been through Community Access. -------------------------------------------- "It took us 15 years to McGyver this thing." -------------------------Carter on Stargate To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. snip Nick, I really hope this makes it crystal clear to you that these men were employees of the company. <<Ocean Cable Group owner Bob Mills said Monday that he suspended Hewitt and Newton from their jobs and will fire them if they're found guilty of the offenses.>> Signaturenimue "...but I want you to know I did save you... not when it counted of course, but after that. Every night after that...every night I save you." Spike to Buffy After Life Gosh, when Spike says heartfelt, sincere things like that -- things straight from his full heart, well, it just makes you wonder why women are crazy about him, doesn't it? >>http://www.fox5ny.com/ >Where on this link is this story? The only thing remotely related to >animals is the score of the hockey game. Since this was dated 12/30/03 and today is 12/31/03 you have to go to news archives. It is the 4th story down. >>(12/30/03 - Atlantic City) Two cable television workers are suspended due >>to charges they dragged a cat to death. Robert Hewitt Junior and Joseph [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from >my e-mail address. > http://www.fox5ny.com/ > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > an animal. Hewitt's and Newton's boss says they'll be fired if they're > convicted. Went to Google News and found this;; Vile inbred scabs!! http://www.thnt.com/thnt/story/0,21282,902476,00.html?sec=main?=centraljer sey Compulsory sterilisation is a part solution! >> Before you read this, know that it contains very upsetting, horrible >> information about cat abuse. If you can stand it, read it, and send >> letters to the company that hired these subhumans demanding that they >> be fired, or whatever else you can think of to do. I think they shoud >> get what they gave, but that's just my opinion. Be alright if we had an address or URL to write to them at!! http://members.aol.com/larrystark/ > Vile inbred scabs!! Thats being too polite. Dead or not these two stupid pieces of sh.t need to be terminated IMMEDIATELY! In my book, people who do things like this are lower than child molesters. Vegan and proud of it! Craig http://www.pet-abuse.com/ http://www.goveg.com/ http://www.peta.com/ http://www.idausa.org/ I agree. Why do some ph*ck-ups loathe felines so intensely ? It has to be that they're simply too dumb to accept that cats are not servile, coercible or dumb. These psychologies seriously annoy me - they're just dumb, uncool spastics. Shoot, if I got my hands on them - they'd get to understand what pain really is. Can't we get a DSM-VII classification for animal cruelty as a pathological psychiatric disorder and lock these arseholes up for substantial periods of their worthless lives ? Stop me if I'm worrying you. Heh. The motherf..kers need to die - slow and painful. Hehe. > > http://www.fox5ny.com/ > > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Vile inbred scabs!! http://www.thnt.com/thnt/story/0,21282,902476,00.html?sec=main?=centraljer > sey > > Compulsory sterilisation is a part solution! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.