Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Angry Kitten

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mad Biker - 17 Jul 2004 10:13 GMT
Gday all

I have an 8 Month old red tom kitten male.

i purchased him when he was about 5 weeks old.

He was a very naughty cat, always getting into trouble and doign things he
isnt allowed to do, we disciplened him with a squirty bottle or lockign him
in his room.

He has plenty of toys.

around 5 months old he became very angry, attacks us, bites and scratches at
random but can be very affectionate.

at 6 months old we had him Desexed to try and stop this behaviour.

Now he attacks at random, attacks my other 10 year old female cat whos just
too old for it.

attacks us and just doesnt seem to be disciplined..

He is locked in his room a lot these days and also runs away from my self,
he runs around the neighbourhood when he has been told not too and
disciplined everytime he does as we are affraid he will get hit by a car. we
have a very large backyard for him to play in thats fenced off with a tall
colour bond fence but he has learned to tunnel underneeth it or jump over
it.

i thnk we have given him lots of love and attention in his life, playing
with him, buying him toys and giving him fresh kangaroo meat.

what can we do to stop his behaviour, as we do not want to put up with him
attacking us?

regards
Nathan Radburn.

--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
~*Connie*~ - 17 Jul 2004 12:13 GMT
he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he grows
up.  He has no idea what he is doing is wrong, he's just being a cat.  You
can tell him know, but like all young boys, they have a short attention
span.  in about a year you'll have a cat with a brain.

> Gday all
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Scumball - 17 Jul 2004 14:13 GMT
> he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he grows
> up.  He has no idea what he is doing is wrong, he's just being a cat.  You
> can tell him know, but like all young boys, they have a short attention
> span.

You appear to have a somewhat jaundiced view of malekind.
The only ones with a short attention span are those with attention deficit
disorder.
This afflicts 3 times the number of boys as it does girls.
But your slur is nevertheless unwarranted - and I have to say, not atypical
of the kind of aggression that characterises femalekind and its attitude to
malekind.
Why are women so partisan ?
If men were as aggressive as towards women because of what they are, this
world would be an insufferable place.
And women wonder why as a gender, they're not accorded the same respect
given to men !

 in about a year you'll have a cat with a brain.

> > Gday all
> >
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Gene Royer - 17 Jul 2004 18:01 GMT
> > he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he grows
> > up.  He has no idea what he is doing is wrong, he's just being a cat.  You
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> And women wonder why as a gender, they're not accorded the same respect
> given to men !

Oh, f.ck you, scumbag.   People like you will stand in the rain for hours
just on the off off chance that you might have an opportunity to be
offended.

I have more grandchildren than you have teeth left in your silly head, and I
know that little boys are much more rambunctuous than are little girls.
What's so offensive about that?  The three sexes of humans are different,
you know.  That same aggressive standard is typical in all areas of the
animal/mammal kingdom; and typically (but not always) tom kittens get into
more things than do their female counterparts.

--Geno<glad I could clear that up for you>Royer
Von Gibbling - 17 Jul 2004 21:39 GMT
Cretin.

> > > he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he
> grows
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> --Geno<glad I could clear that up for you>Royer
Jeßus - 18 Jul 2004 02:21 GMT
> Cretin.

Never mind the Angry Kitten... we have Angry Loners now!

Signature

/Jeßus/

Confucius Says ...
Man young when he snatches kisses, old when he kisses snatches.

Scumball - 18 Jul 2004 13:14 GMT
"Je?us" <_._@ii.net> wrote in message news:5651050.TXedplSWAf@jebus.net...

> > Cretin.
>
> Never mind the Angry Kitten... we have Angry Loners now!

Yeah, not to mention angry cretins !
Hehe.
Tartufo - 08 Aug 2004 12:46 GMT
Your name is fitting!

> > he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he grows
> > up.  He has no idea what he is doing is wrong, he's just being a cat.  You
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> > > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Von Gibbling - 08 Aug 2004 15:06 GMT
Thankyou.

> Your name is fitting!
>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
> > > > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
JPHobbs - 12 Aug 2004 13:52 GMT
You dont really think you can  tell a kitten not to do something
and expect it to obey do you, do you have any children, how would you react
to their disobedience?the same as the kitten ? the kitten attacks you
because
of how you punish it, just for being a kitten, its like telling a baby not
to cry
or wet its nappy.    Jean.P.

> > he is a small young boy.  He is going "to get into trouble' until he grows
> > up.  He has no idea what he is doing is wrong, he's just being a cat.  You
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
> > > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
bassett - 13 Aug 2004 13:07 GMT
Does your husband do as he's  told as well. No course he dosen't.

> You dont really think you can  tell a kitten not to do something
> and expect it to obey do you, do you have any children, how would you react
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
> > > > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
M.C. Mullen - 17 Jul 2004 12:44 GMT
| i thnk we have given him lots of love and attention in his life, playing
| with him, buying him toys and giving him fresh kangaroo meat.

Have you? Look at your statement:

| we disciplened him with a squirty bottle or lockign him
| in his room.
|
| what can we do to stop his behaviour, as we do not want to put up with him
| attacking us?

Give him love!
Mary - 17 Jul 2004 12:45 GMT
>attacks us and just doesnt seem to be disciplined..

He's a little young for too much discipline. He's just being a kitten. I think
the aggression issues may be because of the discipline. When he's doing
something wrong, take him away from that situation and give him something
positive to do, like playing with a toy, a paper bag, laser mouse. He has a LOT
of energy and needs to use it in positive play ways. Also, don't let him play
scratch or play bite. If he thinks that's okay, he will scratch and bite hard
as as adult. Play with him with toys, not your hand if he does this. He'll calm
down in a year or so. Also, don't expect him to stay in the yard on his own. He
won't. Don't let him out or let him out in a enclosed area so he won't get run
over.
Linda Terrell - 17 Jul 2004 14:23 GMT
> He is locked in his room a lot these days and also runs away from my self,
> he runs around the neighbourhood when he has been told not too and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> regards
> Nathan Radburn.

Build a solid enclosure, or get several big dog cages
for him.Link them together into a long "trail"

Most kittens go through the crazies until they are about 1 year old.

LT



--
bassett - 17 Jul 2004 14:42 GMT
Have you considered valeim // serapax

> Gday all
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Kim - 18 Jul 2004 06:02 GMT
You know they have antidepressants for cats now, works for all kinds of
problems too.

A friend of mine has a cat and his cat hates other cats and his fiancee is
moving in with her lovely cat that likes other cats and he has had to put
his cat on clomicalm to calm him down so he wont kill the new cat.

Some cats are just not nice cats, luckily there are people out there that
find those kinds of cats personalities appealing and so they get homes too.
Im yet to see a cat that is a bit wild and bites a lot for no reason have
behaviour modification techniques work on it.

Kim
> Have you considered valeim // serapax
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> > WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
rck - 18 Jul 2004 13:27 GMT
> Some cats are just not nice cats, luckily there are people out there that
> find those kinds of cats personalities appealing and so they get homes too.
> Im yet to see a cat that is a bit wild and bites a lot for no reason have
> behaviour modification techniques work on it.
>
> Kim

There was one stray that showed up here and immediately began attacking the
other cats. I ran it off a few times but it kept coming back, aggressive as
can be. There was no choice except to get rid of it. Most cats can be
trained, but occasionally a bad one happens along and you can't jeopardize
the lives of other cats for the sake of the bad one. Sometimes, if you can't
make peace between animals, you have to choose which one means more to you.
You can't sit idly by while they hurt each other.

Bob
Agua Girl - 18 Jul 2004 11:05 GMT
> > Some cats are just not nice cats, luckily there are people out there that
> > find those kinds of cats personalities appealing and so they get homes
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> make peace between animals, you have to choose which one means more to you.
> You can't sit idly by while they hurt each other.

Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
impressed
with those who can catch, neuter and release) The thing is, the stray isn't
necessarily mean or "bad".  It's doing what comes naturally. It's on it's
own,
no reliable source of food and if it's an unaltered male it's got even more
reason
to be aggressive.  I imagine there are cats like people that are destined to
be
a bit mean no matter what the environment but 99% of them are products of
their upbringing.

AG
rck - 18 Jul 2004 15:53 GMT
>>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
>>impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)

Catch, neuter and release is not an option for me. The local vet charges
$135. The only county animal services are rabies shots for $10, and that's
only because it is a State law that the counties must provide it. There is
no county run animal shelter, no dog officer, nothing. State law provides
that the land owner may "despatch" a nuisance animal on his or her property
providing it isn't a neighbor's domestic pet. Here, it is legal to
"despatch" a stray in the manner of your choosing as long as done humanely.

Bob
Agua Girl - 18 Jul 2004 12:20 GMT
> >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
> >>impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> providing it isn't a neighbor's domestic pet. Here, it is legal to
> "despatch" a stray in the manner of your choosing as long as done humanely.

I wasn't criticizing..I've never done it either.   I just think it's really
cool that
some people do.  My Aunt for one, but she has a deal with the local
Animal Shelter for spay/neutering and shots.

I do have a hard time shooing away strays because I figure they are
probably hungry and maybe a little lonely.  Still...my girl comes first
and I don't want her to be injured or catch something.  If I had an
aggressive one come around here I would do the same thing you did.

AG
rck - 18 Jul 2004 16:48 GMT
> > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
> > >>impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> AG

I do pay the $10 for the rabies shots because I view it as a public health
issue that could affect other animals and humans in the area.

Bob
Larry R Harrison Jr - 26 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
> >>impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bob

I don't know what the laws are, and I don't care. If an animal--ANY animal,
whether it's someone else's pet or whatever--is on your properly repeatedly
and won't quit being a pest, you have every moral right to shoot it or trap
it with a trapping device. I don't care what the law says, you shouldn't
have to bother an Animal Control agency when you're fully capable of
handling it yourself with a BB gun, a REAL gun, or a trapping device which
doesn't kill them. If you're capable of solving the problem yourself
quickly, do it.

Growing up in the country, it was no big deal for my mother to shoot any
stray animals--dogs or cats--with her pistol when they were bothering our 1
1/2 acre yard. She didn't call Animal Control, she'd take care of matters
herself. (And she LOVES cats; she recently had her cat of 16 years die of
old age despite repeated visits to the vet and she talked of how it tore her
up.) I would do the same if I had a 1 1/2 acre yard in the country,
REGARDLESS of what the laws are. You should be able to protect your property
by any means necessary.
Ozboc - 01 Aug 2004 06:15 GMT
> > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am really
> > >>impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> REGARDLESS of what the laws are. You should be able to protect your property
> by any means necessary.

Hope your pet walks into my property one day  ----  It will be the last time

Boc
bassett - 01 Aug 2004 07:58 GMT
You can't say that. All the do gooders on here will get up you.. Then
someone will start a  "Bring Back Cleaver" campain, then were will we be, in
the sh.t. thats where.
  And the first day of Spring Ozboc was heard to say,, Puss, Puss, Puss.
wack,  Dinners on the table chaps..

"Ozboc" <Boc@your_undies_smell.com> wrote in message

> Hope your pet walks into my property one day  ----  It will be the last time
>
> Boc
Mad Biker - 01 Aug 2004 22:20 GMT
If you walk into a lions den, should they kill you?

why stop with animals, lets shoot the door to door sales men too... mormens
and salvo's alike..

--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
WWW.MAD-BIKER.COM
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
> You can't say that. All the do gooders on here will get up you.. Then
> someone will start a  "Bring Back Cleaver" campain, then were will we be, in
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > Boc
Alky - 01 Aug 2004 23:11 GMT
> If you walk into a lions den, should they kill you?
>
> why stop with animals, lets shoot the door to door sales men too... mormens
> and salvo's alike..

Ooohh, can we? P L E A S E.....pretty please!!!!
Gene Royer - 01 Aug 2004 20:28 GMT
> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am
> really
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Boc

Well, if his animal trecks onto my property, It will be the last time he
will ever see it because I'll scoop it up and give it a real home.

I have trapped, spayed and neutered 58 cats in the last seven years, and all
of them were caught right inside my yard.  After they are fixed and
inoculated, I find decent homes for those that are palpable.  Those that are
too feral are returned to the yard, and many (most) stay around because it's
a safe place.

Pet owners come asking around for anyone who might have seen their *lost*
pet, and I tell them "not me."  Anyone who lets their un-fixed cat run loose
in a busy subdivision does not deserve to have it back.

My place is called Hotel Geno.  Cats check in, and they don't check out.

--Geno
Alun - 01 Aug 2004 22:36 GMT
>> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am
>> > > >>really impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> --Geno

Where do you live? I hope it's nowhere near here.
Gene Royer - 01 Aug 2004 23:03 GMT
> >> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I am
> >> > > >>really impressed with those who can catch, neuter and release)
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Where do you live? I hope it's nowhere near here.

I'm in Houston.  If you live near me, don't let your cat run loose, or I
will snatch it up and take it inside where it can be safe from cars, disease
and animal control officers.

--Geno
Alun - 20 Aug 2004 07:56 GMT
>> >> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I
>> >> > > >>am really impressed with those who can catch, neuter and
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> --Geno

Ah, another Texas whacko. Luckily, I am far from Texas and have no plans to
go anywhere near anytime soon. Anyone who tries to justify abducting other
people's pets is someone I don't want to know.
Adonis - 21 Aug 2004 20:34 GMT
> >> >> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off (although I
> >> >> > > >>am really impressed with those who can catch, neuter and
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> go anywhere near anytime soon. Anyone who tries to justify abducting other
> people's pets is someone I don't want to know.

You're silly.

Here in this area, animal control comes along and traps the animals either
in nets or live-catch traps.  A caught cat is a dead cat.  Which would you
prefer?

--Geno
Alun - 07 Sep 2004 20:55 GMT
>> >> >> > > >>Absolutely, and you're right to run the stray off
>> >> >> > > >>(although I am really impressed with those who can catch,
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> --Geno

There is no 'animal control' here in that sense. DNR will come if someone
calls them, but I can't imagine a circumstance where they would come out to
trap a cat.
bassett - 02 Aug 2004 07:56 GMT
well your Mr wonderful aren't you, and you even collect feral animals,
de-nut them as well, then return them back to the environment, where they
continue to kill the wildlife..
 Its a wonder you find time to write it  all down. But then your on an ego
trip, so it does help to have a record of your exploits, after all no-one
knows your doing it.
But when you break it down , your not that wonderful,  its only 8 cats a
year
or one every 6 weeks or so. and as you say all the feral's stick around, So
you must be catching them more then once

But as long as your happy, who am I to  say anything, mind you Boc leaves
you for dead, Nothing ever escapes, and unlike "Pets Cemetery" nothing gets
to come back
                                                             bassett
.
"Gene Royer" <siregeno@Mindset.net> wrote in message

I have trapped, spayed and neutered 58 cats in the last seven years, and all
of them were caught right inside my yard.  After they are fixed and
inoculated, I find decent homes for those that are palpable.  Those that are
too feral are returned to the yard, and many (most) stay around because it's
a safe place.
Luvskats00 - 02 Aug 2004 14:05 GMT
"bassett" bassett@bassettskennell.com
writes

>well your Mr wonderful aren't you, and you even collect feral animals,
>de-nut them as well, then return them back to the environment, where they
>continue to kill the wildlife..
>  Its a wonder you find time to write it  all down.

Congrat. You have won the monthly "dammit, i can bring down the most sainted
individual/nobody can do anything good according to my way of thinkin'" award.

You forgot to share your list of accomplishments with the newsgroup. Which list
was yours? The one starting with finding a cure for cancer or the one ending
with stamping out poverty?

You might want to take a course or two in spelling and/or grammer (as
demonstrated by the mistakes above).

Spaying and neutering feral colonies is commendable and responsible!
Gene Royer - 02 Aug 2004 19:09 GMT
> "bassett" bassett@bassettskennell.com
> writes
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Spaying and neutering feral colonies is commendable and responsible!

LOL!  Thanks.   Perhaps the writer (Basset) does not realize that feral cats
are wildlife, too.  I think when s/he sobers up and reads what s/he wrote it
will be a sobering experience indeed.

One of my most prized cats is a big Maincoon named Arnold.  Arnold was
abandoned when his family moved away, and he was left to roam the
subdivision and find his food where he could.  When I first saw him, I
perceived him feral because I could tell he had not been neutered, and he
would run from me.  I trapped him and had him fixed and inoculated, cured
his ear mites, stitched his fighting wounds and gave him some tasty food.
He stayed around.

A few months later, my wife was able to pet him, and from that moment on, he
displayed a desire to come inside the house.  I was hesitant because he was
such a large and dominant cat, and I was afraid for the tamer house cats
inside.

But he was well acquainted with house living, happy to use the litter box
and accustomed to being fed in a bowl.  He's been an insider now for five
'naf years.

In retrospect it is a good thing I did all this because he developed
stomatitis and diabetes, which if untreated will make the cat unable to eat,
and he will literally starve to death.  We treat it with twice-monthly
catabolic steroids and twice-daily injections of insulin.

He's about 17 (we think) and we expect him to top 20.

Yes, I am Mr Wonderful to him.

--Geno
Luvskats00 - 02 Aug 2004 20:10 GMT
>"Gene Royer" siregeno@Mindset.net writes

>"Luvskats00" wrote that

>bassett@bassettskennell.com
> wrote  "well your Mr wonderful >aren't you, and you even collect >feral
animals,
>de-nut them as well, then return >them back to the environment, where they
>continue to kill the wildlife..
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>sainted
>> individual/nobody can do >>anything good according to my >>way of thinkin'"
award.

>> You forgot to share your list of >>accomplishments with the >>newsgroup.
Which
>list
>> was yours? The one starting with >>finding a cure for cancer or the >>one
ending
>> with stamping out poverty?
>>
>> You might want to take a course >>or two in spelling and/or grammer (as
>> demonstrated by the mistakes above).
>> Spaying and neutering feral >>colonies is commendable and >>responsible!

>>>LOL!  Thanks.   Perhaps the >>writer (Basset) does not realize >>>that feral
cats
>>>are wildlife, too.  I think when >>>s/he sobers up and reads what >>>s/he
wrote it
>>>will be a sobering experience indeed.
>>>One of my most prized cats is a >>>big Maincoon named Arnold.  Arnold was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>>In retrospect it is a good thing I >>>did all this because he developed
>>>stomatitis and diabetes, which if >>>untreated will make the cat unable to
eat,
>>>>and he will literally starve to death.  We treat it with >>>twice-monthly
>>>catabolic steroids and >>>twice-daily injections of insulin.
>>>He's about 17 (we think) and we >>>expect him to top 20.
>>>Yes, I am Mr Wonderful to him.
>--Geno

I love to hear stories like that!  That poor boy would have died (painfully) if
you didn't rescue him!  The family that (not only) abandoned him AND left him
(unneuetered) should have located and fined.  Some states would have actually
prosecuted the abandonment as a felony and required jail time for the owner!
I'm all for that.
Gene Royer - 02 Aug 2004 20:09 GMT
> well your Mr wonderful aren't you, and you even collect feral animals,
> de-nut them as well, then return them back to the environment, where they
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to come back
>                                                               bassett

Hi,

If you've sobered up by now, read my message below, and you will see that I
don't say "all the ferals stick around".  (By the way, I do have to catch
the ferals annually to get them their rabies shots, etc.  It's a tough job
because they will not easily be caught in the same manner as before.  So, I
have to devise more clever methods each year.)

My vet bill each year runs in the $9,000 range, and that does not include
food.  We feed only premium cat food because I learned long ago that the
better food you feed the cat the less time (and money) you will spend at the
vet.

(We also feed all our cats (insiders and outsiders) Risotriene?--which you
can google--and it has greatly reduced the incidences of sickness among
them.)
www.integrisdream.com/Generoyer

Usually when cats are roaming loose--either ferals, small kittens (which are
also feral) or someone else's pet cat that they have de-clawed and turned
loose--they might have all manner of maladies: ear mites, worms, fleas,
fighting wounds, etc.   When I have them fixed, I also have the vet take
care of those problems as well.  It is expensive, but worth it.(People who
declaw their cats and then turn them outside are not responsible pet owners)

I have a special place where I can keep a feral cat for a week or so and
administer medication if needs be.  This requires cunning--and no small
amount of daring.  And when the cat is well enough to be turned loose, I let
them go.  As I said, it is amazing how many of the feral cats actually stick
close to the manor grounds and return to eat and get fresh water (and get
caught again the next year <G>).

Three years ago, two big, black and white twin tomcats came around.  I
noticed that one of them had a horrible gash on his left front paw, with the
skin hanging down more than an inch, and bare flesh showing.  He was so sick
that I went out and actually picked him up in a towel and took him to the
vet.

His three-weeks stay at the vet was an exception for me, but it was
necessary to get him well.  We neutered him and gave him the necessary
inoculations, etc., and I brought him home for home nursing care for about
three weeks.  After that period of time he was so tame that I decided to
keep him inside.  The vet bill was astronomical, but I got a fine pal in
exchange.  His name is Tiny.

His brother <outside> has subsequently been caught and fixed and remains an
outsider who stays in my yard almost all the time.  I can pet him easily,
and if needs be I could bring him in and keep him in the special screened
area that I mentioned above <about 12 X14 feet> on my porch.  He's a
beautiful cat.  His name is Tinytwo.

Me go now.

--Geno<Mr Wonderful>Royer
http://mastersfitness.royergovernance.com/fitlog/
www.kickaliberalsbutt.com

> .
> "Gene Royer" <siregeno@Mindset.net> wrote in message
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> too feral are returned to the yard, and many (most) stay around because it's
> a safe place.
bassett - 03 Aug 2004 14:50 GMT
You really are Mr Wonderful, Obversely a septic tank, by the way you prattle
on, But I like a lot of other people on this Australian news group, have
seen your sort before, You come and you go, Thankfully you mostly go. back
to your little  world of doing wonderful things for the environment.  We
don't allow de-clawing in this country, and my good friend "Kim" will
no-doubt explain why. But if it makes your little existence  worthwhile, so
be it..
 As for sobering up,  putting up with your crap, would drive a saint to
drink,
but on my worst day, I can still deal with the likes of you, without even
thinking about it.  So at what point of your posts do you start to ask for
donations for your cause of  Pussy restoration.

We have some nice people in this country that also love cats, In fact they
love them so much that they make Hats out of them, and very nice they are
too..  But sadly I,m not one of them.. I just hate the bloody things, but
strangely enough I do like Pussy, and have been know to eat a hole one, from
time to time..  ****What's the betting that goes over his head*****

Well must  go, the Pubs open, and I have to feed the  Angelfish, or they get
the sardines to bang on there tins and it's disturbs the Crabs, Do you have
Crabs.
        Bye Bye,,     Love to all     bassett.
 Cats on the rooftops, Cats on the Tiles , Cats with sylliphlis, Cats with
piles.  Blah,Blah,Blah.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> http://mastersfitness.royergovernance.com/fitlog/
> www.kickaliberalsbutt.com
Silver - 04 Aug 2004 11:54 GMT
> well your Mr wonderful aren't you, and you even collect feral animals,
> de-nut them as well, then return them back to the environment, where they
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> or one every 6 weeks or so. and as you say all the feral's stick around, So
> you must be catching them more then once

Sorry to bust in on this group like this, as I am a newcomer, but it is
obvious that you have not done any research into the benefits of Spay Neuter
and Return. It has been found consistently to be the best form of
controlling feral populations, especially around towns. As long as cats are
breeding, and people are dumping their pets - the feral population is always
going to rise and spread into adjacent areas. As cats are territorial, a
neutered population is very effective in keeping other cats from moving into
the area. As far as killing wildlife - well I live in Australia and that is
a real problem here - but what most people don't know is that thousands of
cats were released by our own government here as a form of rabbit control
during the rabbit plauge. I believe in inside cats, especially in Australia,
and failing that curfews. People who are ready to blame the cat for
decimating our wildlife should really take a long hard look at THEMSELVES
though first, because cars, pollution, land clearing and hunting result in
far more destruction - and we are doing this with the knowledge that our
human brains afford us whereas cats are following their survival instincts.
What is an automatic response in a cat can be likened to pre-meditated
murder in humans when we throw a cigarette butt into the grass, clear a
paddock or drive a car.

> But as long as your happy, who am I to  say anything, mind you Boc leaves
> you for dead, Nothing ever escapes, and unlike "Pets Cemetery" nothing gets
> to come back

Attacking a person is never attacking the issue and leads to flaming and the
like - behaviour that is not only childish but benefits nobody. I would
never let an unneutered cat roam - but if my cat accidentally got out, I
would hope that nobody hurt her as they would regret it when karma finally
caught up with them.

-Silver
"I love cats because I enjoy my home; & little by little, they become its
visible soul."

- Jean Cocteau 1889-1963.
Agua Girl - 04 Aug 2004 13:55 GMT
> Sorry to bust in on this group like this, as I am a newcomer, but it is
> obvious that you have not done any research into the benefits of Spay Neuter
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> murder in humans when we throw a cigarette butt into the grass, clear a
> paddock or drive a car.

Wow....couldn't have said it better myself.  I often wonder what kind of
pesticides are used in the gardens of those people complaining about the
neighbors cat killing the birds.

> > But as long as your happy, who am I to  say anything, mind you Boc leaves
> > you for dead, Nothing ever escapes, and unlike "Pets Cemetery" nothing
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> would hope that nobody hurt her as they would regret it when karma finally
> caught up with them.

Well said....again, and welcome to the group
I can tell I am going to enjoy reading your posts.

AG
Silver - 04 Aug 2004 15:15 GMT
> > Sorry to bust in on this group like this, as I am a newcomer, but it is
> > obvious that you have not done any research into the benefits of Spay
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> Well said....again, and welcome to the group
> I can tell I am going to enjoy reading your posts.

Thank you for the welcome :)
And the praise - though I'm sure it's undeserved :)

-Silver
"I love cats because I enjoy my home; & little by little, they become its
visible soul."

- Jean Cocteau 1889-1963.
bassett - 05 Aug 2004 06:41 GMT
You might not have noticed but this is an Australian news group, and most
of us here are  Aussie's ,  Not sure about Boc, and he's not sure about me,
but the rest of the mob are normal.   Hi Alpha
But the bloke that prattled on about  de-nut, de-claw, and release is
defiantly not one of us.. Some foreign muck, no doubt. Had some bloody funny
ideas as well..
  But you did get it a little bit wrong,, We don't abuse, we entertain. If
you take offence at our humour,  Stiff. if not keep contributing..  And you
can abuse me if you like, Its a form of comunication, and no-one talks to me
anyway  *sob,sob*
                                                            bassett
Agua Girl - 05 Aug 2004 06:12 GMT
>  You might not have noticed but this is an Australian news group, and most
> of us here are  Aussie's ,

Actually this is cross posted into 2 other groups..neither of which are
exclusively Australian.
M.C. Mullen - 05 Aug 2004 07:56 GMT
| >  You might not have noticed but this is an Australian news group, and most
| > of us here are  Aussie's ,
|
| Actually this is cross posted into 2 other groups..neither of which are
| exclusively Australian.

I thought most of the people here come from the US ?

Carola
Luvskats00 - 05 Aug 2004 12:14 GMT
"M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
writes
>"I thought most of the people here >come from the US ?
"

And I thought the majority of people were from the UK and the USA.
Agua Girl - 05 Aug 2004 13:37 GMT
> "M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
> writes
> >"I thought most of the people here >come from the US ?
> "
>
> And I thought the majority of people were from the UK and the USA.

I don't know if we have ever done a poll.  I just assumed that the
poster I was responding too was from aus.pets and didn't realize
the thread was being cross posted to non "aus" groups.

I know a lot of folks who regularly post here are from the UK and
US because there is always such a debate about the differing laws
but I don't know how many are from other countries.

AG
Silver - 06 Aug 2004 01:33 GMT
> "M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
> writes
> >"I thought most of the people here >come from the US ?
> "
>
> And I thought the majority of people were from the UK and the USA.

Lol. An international group for sure! Maybe us Aussies should swallow our
National Pride and realise that the called alt.cats not alt.aussie.cats or
alt.cats.australia.
The internet is open to everyone - and I believe that desex and release is
still an option here: after all stopping feral cats from breeding is what we
want isn't it? Of course, this works best in suburbian areas because the
cats are more sedentatry but if farmers (who often keep cats as vermin
control anyway) were to adopt it as well then it could work if enough people
did it - though I don't think that will ever happen. Even the army which are
called in to control feral cats at times, have been unable to make more than
a dint in their numbers. Cats are very resistant to baits and if they don't
die will be bait-shy for the rest of their lives. They are hard to trap, and
shooting is not going to work on cats any more than it does on any other
feral animal that plauges Australia. Cats are small, nocturnal and breed at
a surprisingly high rate. They are very successful predators and can live
without water if they get enough fresh meat. Although feral cats do eat our
bird and warm and cuddlies, the greatest danger is to our reptiles - which
form the bulk of our feral cat's diet here in Australia. Now most Aussies I
know think that the only good snake is a dead one (something that leads me
to wonder if we really do have the best interests of our wildlife at heart)
and dingos are treated about the same yet they have been here for about 40
000 years and live in balance with our wildlife. Feral pigs, rabbits and
goats cause more environmental damage and we haven't even been able to
eradicate them. Any system that tries to address the problem more logically,
while also being the most humane, is the best system in my eyes.
Agua Girl - 06 Aug 2004 04:18 GMT
> > "M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
> > writes
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> still an option here: after all stopping feral cats from breeding is what we
> want isn't it?

There was a story in the news today that a local city actually used feral
cats to control the rodent population.  I wish I could remember the city
so I could look it up but from what I gathered in the 60 second news
bite...the powers that be at city hall had a desex and release group release
them within the city hall.  Now they don't have any more rodents and they
are considering expanding the program to other areas within the city.  The
cats aren't "domesticated"  but they do provide them access to water,
shelter
and some food.  ( I guess enough to keep them around but not so much as
to stop them from hunting)

AG
Gene Royer - 06 Aug 2004 13:07 GMT
> > > "M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
> > > writes
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> AG

Reprinted in part from www.tocquevillian.com

Trap-Neuter-Inoculate-Release? (Gene Royer)

Recently Jacksonville Naval Air Station (USA) found itself overrun with more
than 200 cats. The Navy?s solution was to starve and exterminate the
animals.  But problems arose regarding ethics and results.

?We?ve been using euthanasia for decades,? said Richard Black. ?It hasn?t
worked.  Wild cats are no different from raccoons or opossums, and we wouldn
?t think of destroying them. When we catch them we take great effort to
return them to the wilds. So, why do we treat cats differently--when it?s
not even their fault they?re here.?

The implication was: Residents allowed their cats to roam without concern
for their breeding capabilities--thus being the main cause of the problem.
?The solution is something radically different from what we?ve been doing.
Trap-neuter-inoculate-release, is the wave of the future.?

Trap, neuter, inoculate, release--back into the neighborhood, but without
the capacity to reproduce.

A huge industry exists in America around the nurturing of cats. Entire
aisles in supermarkets are set aside for the necessities of cats and dogs.
Animal clinics abound to aid in their care. How can we, as responsible
citizens, fail to address this problem from a humane point? And who among
us--the board included--is willing to face a sensitive and story-hungry TV
medium who might approach us with charges of animal abuse--particularly when
other humane options exist?

I presented the local homeowners' board a list of 54 cats I have caught,
sterilized and inoculated over a seven-year period at my own expense; and as
a result I have not seen a stray kitten in my yard in two years. If 2 cats
can produce 80 million, how many can 54?

BTW, you can do the math and conclude that it was no small expense.  Some
animals needed additional veterinarian treatment for various illnesses,
infestations and/or wounds.  One little guy needed extensive rectal surgery
just so he could poop regularly.  He's now a magnificent inside-the-house
pet weighing 13 pounds of muscle.

Of this number, 37 were females. Some were kittens, which I adopted to
families who would keep them inside. I placed some of the older strays with
farmers who put them in their barns as mousers. Others I returned to their
families, and some I returned to the neighborhood.  Some remain in my yard,
and I catch them annually for inoculation.

Cats have no predators. They reproduce faster than rabbits or mice. William
Daniel, a Jacksonville Beach veterinarian said, ?Returning the cats helps
keep down the population of rats."

Strays are not the problem. As with Jacksonville Naval Station, the problem
is irresponsible residents who allow their cats to roam without concern for
their breeding capacity. If we work together, we can solve the problem.

--Gene Royer
?Copyright Gene Royer Houston TX 2003
shakra - 09 Aug 2004 00:52 GMT
Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
city and country you live in)..

However, desexing and releasing cats only leaves animals on the street that
are homeless...

Why not just surrender them to animal control (the ones you dont wish to
keep as your own) and if they dont find suitable homes, then they get put
down.

The death of one feral animal could further prevent hundreds of losses of
wildlife such as frogs, many of which here in Australia are facing
extinction due to cats roaming at night...

No new reports say whether these cats have been neutered or not.. as it has
nothing to do with cats killing wildlife.

why would you WANT feral cats in your neighbourhood?? whether they are
capable of breeding or not..
what happens when they attack your kids?  sh.t in peoples gardens and spread
diseases like ringworm?

> > > "M.C. Mullen" mcmullen@freesurf.invalid.ch
> > > writes
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> AG
Agua Girl - 09 Aug 2004 06:13 GMT
> Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
> city and country you live in)..
>
> However, desexing and releasing cats only leaves animals on the street that
> are homeless...

???  They aren't homeless...they just don't live with humans.

> Why not just surrender them to animal control (the ones you dont wish to
> keep as your own) and if they dont find suitable homes, then they get put
> down.

Well...because it isn't necessary to "put them down".  Just because a feral
cat doesn't have the same life as my domesticated (spoilt) house cat doesn't
make his life any less fulfilled.

> The death of one feral animal could further prevent hundreds of losses of
> wildlife such as frogs, many of which here in Australia are facing
> extinction due to cats roaming at night...

First off, there isn't a lot of wild life at city hall.  Secondly, animals
have
been killing other animals long before we got involved. These arent animals
that were recently "introduced" into an ecosystem which is now suffering
becaue of it.

> No new reports say whether these cats have been neutered or not.. as it has
> nothing to do with cats killing wildlife.

Right, and in a lot of ecosystems, that's how it works.  Lions kill zebras
to
live..poor zebras.  We should go lock up all the lions right?  Ohh..and
those
damn eagles killing those innocent birds and rodents.  Lock them up to or
if you can't find a place to lock them up, put them down.  BTW...
neutering the cat is not done to protect the wildlife when the cat is
re-released.  It's to prevent that same cat from affecting the wildlife
for hundreds of years while it's numerous offsprings multiply so much
they have to move on to frogs.

I know I am exaggerating and I apologize for the sarcasm but I hear
that all the time. "how do I keep my neighbors cat from killing birds"
The answer is you don't.  God made them what they are..who are we
to say they should be different.

I understand the problem with the frogs is a different story.  Man tried to
"improve" upon nature , intoducing a bunch of cats where none used to
exists.
> why would you WANT feral cats in your neighbourhood?? whether they are
> capable of breeding or not..
> what happens when they attack your kids?  sh.t in peoples gardens and spread
> diseases like ringworm?

I don't want feral cats in my neighborhood..but they are there so it's no
longer about what I want, it's about reality.  I don't want them dead.  It's
a life and it's not my decision that it's life is less valuable than the
birds
it might kill.  What I can do is prevent it's offspring from doing the same
And before you mention it...I don't consider killing a cat just because it's
not your pet desirable.

AG
shakra - 10 Aug 2004 02:29 GMT
this is a debate that could go on and on with pros and cons for boths sides
of the story..

I do value and appreciate your comments, but I still stand by my own
opinions...

It's obvious that we live in totally different areas of the world, and the
cats have different impacts on the environment.

I live an area with lots and lots of feral cats... one of which became my
own.. and he is now domesticated (and in surgery as we speak - poor
bugger!)...   so I understand where you are coming from.. but I still see
the problems far outweighing the positives with these ferals terrorising
domesticated pets in the street as well as the other issues.. for my local
community this is the case at least.

This may or may not apply to you.. and you may or may not like what I have
said about euthenasing these ferals... but it;'s just a personal opinion,
and not meant to offend in any way..

Have a great day!

> > Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
> > city and country you live in)..
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
> AG
AC - 05 Sep 2004 04:24 GMT
> > Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
> > city and country you live in)..
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> that were recently "introduced" into an ecosystem which is now suffering
> becaue of it.

The domestic cat, as we know it, would not have evolved unless man bred it,
and definitely would not exist in Australia. Therefore, in order to consider
it a part of an natural ecosystem, you need to blur your definitions
somewhat. To consider a domestic cat turned feral as part of any "ecosystem"
is plain ignorance. They are about as much a part of an ecosystem as DDT
is - ubiquitous, dangerous, man-made, and doesn't belong there.

> > No new reports say whether these cats have been neutered or not.. as it
> has
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> The answer is you don't.  God made them what they are..who are we
> to say they should be different.

You sure are exaggerating, lions & zebras are legitimate parts of natural
ecosystems. No humans participated in the breeding-out of parts of their
lineage.

> I understand the problem with the frogs is a different story.  Man tried to
> "improve" upon nature , intoducing a bunch of cats where none used to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> birds
> it might kill.  What I can do is prevent it's offspring from

The birds (and many other species that have lived in Australia) are
threatened the man-made, and man-neglect introduction of feral cats. If man
does not take steps to correct the situation, it will be complicit in the
destruction of yet another native species that would be fine if we didn't
step foot here.

To ignore the problem would be a crime against our biodiversity, and that
diversity needs only 3 less species - Rabbit, Fox, and FERAL CAT!!!

doing the same
> And before you mention it...I don't consider killing a cat just because it's
> not your pet desirable.
>
> AG
Gene Royer - 10 Aug 2004 10:41 GMT
> Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
> city and country you live in)..
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> wildlife such as frogs, many of which here in Australia are facing
> extinction due to cats roaming at night...

Frogs?  You are a silly litte person.  Please post you whiny blithering to
alt.frogs.

What a nitwit you are.

--Geno
Gene Royer - 10 Aug 2004 11:20 GMT
> > Agree that it's in the best interests of the community (regardless of what
> > city and country you live in)..
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > keep as your own) and if they dont find suitable homes, then they get put
> > down.

What happened to all that "cats' free will" that you were rattling on about
last week?  You hypocritical little twit.  You're so full of crap you squish
when you walk.

Have you ever had a sensible thought in your silly life?

--Geno<glad I could clear that up for you>Royer
rpl - 10 Aug 2004 16:21 GMT
> What happened to all that "cats' free will" that you were rattling on about
> last week?  

That was me you idiot. And I told you to substitute "god-given nature"
if it makes your warped mind unkink a little.

The difference between human free-will and animal "free-will" is that
God holds us accountable.

> You hypocritical little twit.  You're so full of crap you squish
> when you walk.

?
f.ck Off.

pat

> Have you ever had a sensible thought in your silly life?
>
> --Geno<glad I could clear that up for you>Royer
Gene Royer - 12 Aug 2004 01:54 GMT
> > What happened to all that "cats' free will" that you were rattling on about
> > last week?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> pat

Thanks for the offer, but I have other plans.

As for your admonition that it was you who mentioned "free will", I agree.
However, the poster to whom I was directing my statement above was also
adamant about it.  She took exception to my statement below:

"Cats to not have a right to free will.  That is a virtue reserved only to
humans.  Mankind was given dominion over all the animals on earth and that
prerogative still exists."

In response, she wrote:

"Hello!??? Are you for real??? Someone please lock this person up... mankind
is one of the animals on earth... so lets lock this one up, stick it in a
gimp suit and f.ck it up the arse! See how you like domination..."

I'm sorry that you have not been able to keep up.  Please try harder because
you're holding things up.

--Geno
rpl - 06 Aug 2004 23:53 GMT
 > I thought most of the people here come from the US ?

um, nope, I'm in a little country north of you.

The reference though was to the message thread being posted not only in
alt.pet.cats and alt.cats but aus.pets (the .aus signifies Australia)
where I think cats are regarded with the same love and affection we give
raccoons and for much the same reasons.

pat
Gene Royer - 07 Aug 2004 00:10 GMT
>   > I thought most of the people here come from the US ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> pat

Which country?  I'm in Houston, and I have an international consulting
practice; and I've visited most countries in the northern hemisphere.
Everywhere I go, I see people harboring cats.

Cats are cool pets.  I just got done getting bit because I was giving my
Kitty Cat a hard time <g>.    She's 17 years this September.  Her bite is
more a nibble because I took two of her canine teeth last spring.

--Geno
Kim - 07 Aug 2004 04:49 GMT
Actually that is a really general statement and probably one most cat lovers
in Australia would find offensive.

Cats are very much loved family pets in Australia.

Sure feral cats cause a real problem to our native fauna, along with many
domestic cats as well with owners that are not responsible and dont bother
locking them up at night.

In general though on a person to person basis (obviously we cant compare
populations) Australians love cats as pets as much as Americans do.

Kim

>   > I thought most of the people here come from the US ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> pat
rpl - 07 Aug 2004 07:11 GMT
> In general though on a person to person basis (obviously we cant compare
> populations) Australians love cats as pets as much as Americans do.
>
> Kim

k, thanks. :)

pat

(hmm, an opinion based on TV righted by the internet.... got to be
something wrong with that ;)
Kim - 08 Aug 2004 01:09 GMT
Like I said though feral cats are a real problem here and many steps are
taken to try and kill them in the wild.

From a vet perspective though the average is 60% dog owners and 40% cat
owners.

This is actually changing too so as more and more apartments are put up in
the cities and surrounding suburbs and there are less houses with yards more
people are getting cats as pets instead of dogs so in the next 10 years the
statistics seem to point to more and more cat ownership over dogs.

One good point also is the more welfare centres are desexing kittens at 8
weeks old before adopting them to people we are actually seeing a decrease
in unwanted litters in the cities.

You will never stop bad pet owners from getting a pet but you can try and
reduce the numbers of unwanted litters produced in the first place.

Kim

> > In general though on a person to person basis (obviously we cant compare
> > populations) Australians love cats as pets as much as Americans do.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> (hmm, an opinion based on TV righted by the internet.... got to be
> something wrong with that ;)
Ashley - 08 Aug 2004 02:24 GMT
> Like I said though feral cats are a real problem here and many steps are
> taken to try and kill them in the wild.
>
> From a vet perspective though the average is 60% dog owners and 40% cat
> owners.

Interesting stat - NZ has the highest rate of cat ownership of all the
nations it commonly compares itself to - 52% of households own a cat, 18%
own two. Only 28% of households own a dog. The number of cats per capita is
around 0.275, compared with the US and Aus at about 0.225.

http://www.petfoodnz.co.nz (click on reference and the pet food market for
more details).
Lindsay Heinz - 08 Aug 2004 08:37 GMT
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 22:53:42 GMT, rpl was saying ....

>  > I thought most of the people here come from the US ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>where I think cats are regarded with the same love and affection we give
>raccoons and for much the same reasons.

I live in Australia and stray cats are a definite pest in my suburb
despite pet owners supposedly being required to keep dogs & cats
within their own properties. Our local council employs a contractor
who controls stray dogs very well, to the extent that there are seldom
dogs wandering our streets but cats are more difficult to control.

The contractor loans out traps to people troubled by cats so wandering
cats can be captured, then those that can be identified are returned
to their owners (after the owners pay a fine) if homes can't be found
for the remainder they would be put down.

Cats are blamed for killing off our wild life but large hunting dogs
that have gone feral living in packs of a dozen or more throughout
forest areas pose a greater threat to our wildlife and even the safety
of humans.
Signature


Lindsay.

Ashley - 08 Aug 2004 08:49 GMT
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 22:53:42 GMT, rpl was saying ....
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> who controls stray dogs very well, to the extent that there are seldom
> dogs wandering our streets but cats are more difficult to control.

Where in Australia are you. I have heard of the laws in Victoria about
keeping cats in at night, but have not heard of any about keeping cats on
you own property, full stop. It seems like pissing into the wind to me.

> The contractor loans out traps to people troubled by cats so wandering
> cats can be captured, then those that can be identified are returned
> to their owners (after the owners pay a fine) if homes can't be found
> for the remainder they would be put down.

So all cats are meant to be indoor-only or caged cats?
Lindsay Heinz - 08 Aug 2004 11:21 GMT
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:49:41 +1200, Ashley was saying ....

>> I live in Australia and stray cats are a definite pest in my suburb
>> despite pet owners supposedly being required to keep dogs & cats
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>keeping cats in at night, but have not heard of any about keeping cats on
>you own property, full stop.

I'm in a Melbourne bayside suburb within Victoria that was nicknamed
"Dog Town" for many years. As restrictions were placed on dogs by our
Council, people protested because similar restrictions weren't being
placed on cats, so now restrictions are being placed on cats.

>It seems like pissing into the wind to me.

It does?

>> The contractor loans out traps to people troubled by cats so wandering
>> cats can be captured, then those that can be identified are returned
>> to their owners (after the owners pay a fine) if homes can't be found
>> for the remainder they would be put down.
>
>So all cats are meant to be indoor-only or caged cats?

My dogs don't enter other people's properties, so why should a
neighbour's cat be permitted to enter my property?

I have my own trap which I've been given permission to use and when I
trap a cat I phone the contractor who will pick up the cat and return
my trap later in the day.

One elderly neighbour likes to feed stray cats but many of my other
neighbours take advantage of the traps to rid their properties of
cats. It may eventually eradicate many of the wandering cats from our
suburb.

My dogs must be accompanied and on a lead when outside my property
except when I take them to a designated dog off lead area.
Signature


Lindsay.

Ashley - 08 Aug 2004 20:28 GMT
> >It seems like pissing into the wind to me.
>
> It does?

Yup. Building a wall to keep a cat in would be a *lot* more expensive than
building a wall to keep a dog in. It would have to be higher and your choice
of materials would be much more limited. If it's a choice between the
neighbour's cat venturing on to your property every now and then and a 2.5m
stone or corrugated iron fence, I know which most people would choose!

It's easy enough to scare cats so that they won't do whatever it is you
think might cause you harm while they're in you're property (using your
garden as a toilet is the only thing I can think of) by using water bottles
and loud noises to give them a *very* bad impression of the place. But other
than passing through, what else are they going to do that makes you so
determined not to have them on your property? There is not the problem of
possible attacks, as with dogs, for instance.

I have to say, when a dog strays on to my property I simply shoo it away.
Lindsay Heinz - 08 Aug 2004 22:58 GMT
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 07:28:04 +1200, Ashley was saying ....

>> >It seems like pissing into the wind to me.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>I have to say, when a dog strays on to my property I simply shoo it away.

In Australia Victoria isn't the only State restricting cats
http://www.busselton.wa.gov.au/comlaw/catlaw.htm
http://www.dalby.qld.gov.au/services/cats.asp
http://www.alicesprings.nt.gov.au/council/services/animal_cat.asp

and I noticed similar views being expressed in New Zealand.
http://www.rspcanz.org.nz/pet_care/vets/vet2.html
Signature


Lindsay.

Ashley - 09 Aug 2004 07:22 GMT
> In Australia Victoria isn't the only State restricting cats
> http://www.busselton.wa.gov.au/comlaw/catlaw.htm
> http://www.dalby.qld.gov.au/services/cats.asp
> http://www.alicesprings.nt.gov.au/council/services/animal_cat.asp

Jeesh, your local bodies are turning into control freaks over there!

>  and I noticed similar views being expressed in New Zealand.
> http://www.rspcanz.org.nz/pet_care/vets/vet2.html

Very, very much a minority view. There are definitely new developments that
have "no cat" covenants because they are in ecologically sensitive areas,
and no one disagrees with that. There are also offshore islands where cats
are banned - Great Barrier being the one that springs to mind - and no on
argues with that for the same reason.

I don't know any cat lover who would be opposed to desexing (I don't know
any cat lover with entire cats other than breeders), registration or
microchiping. I have no problems with any of them.

But restricting cats to their owners' property when, quite frankly, they are
no danger in terms of attacks the way dogs are (which is the main rational
behind restricting dogs in this country) or limiting the number a household
can have smacks of an irrational desire to control others.

And I am comfortable in claiming to speak for most of New Zealand on that
one :-)
Ivor Jones - 09 Aug 2004 09:00 GMT
> > In Australia Victoria isn't the only State restricting cats
> > http://www.busselton.wa.gov.au/comlaw/catlaw.htm
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> are banned - Great Barrier being the one that springs to mind - and no on
> argues with that for the same reason.

Hmm, not sure I agree with this, why..?

> I don't know any cat lover who would be opposed to desexing (I don't know
> any cat lover with entire cats other than breeders), registration or
> microchiping. I have no problems with any of them.

Nor do I.

> But restricting cats to their owners' property when, quite frankly, they are
> no danger in terms of attacks the way dogs are (which is the main rational
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> And I am comfortable in claiming to speak for most of New Zealand on that
> one :-)

And the entire UK. Here, cats are effectively regarded (by the law) as
wild animals, with the freedom to come and go as they please. It has long
been recognised the futility of trying to control cat movement.

Ivor
Ashley - 09 Aug 2004 11:30 GMT
> > > In Australia Victoria isn't the only State restricting cats
> > > http://www.busselton.wa.gov.au/comlaw/catlaw.htm
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Hmm, not sure I agree with this, why..?

You need to understand New Zealand's wildlife. There are no native mammals
apart from bats. Even the rats were introduced (first Pacific rats, or
kiore, and then your common or garden rat found throughout the world). As a
result, the wildlife developed without the need to protect itself from
efficient mammalian hunters. Every part of your food chain (your being
Britain's and basically every other part of the world) that is inhabited by
a mammal is, here, inhabited by a bird or a reptile. And many of those birds
that adapted to take advantage of the opportunities for grazing found that
wings were pretty pointless if you're spending your life on the ground, or
in low bushes, so they gave them up.

Needless to say, the introduction of mammals such as rats, stoats (yes, some
idiot introduced them - to control the rabbits they introduced earlier and
which had got slightly out of hand), cats and dogs absolutely decimated the
populations of these birds and of many various lizards and reptiles -
including the tuatara, the closest living relative to the dinosaurs. While
some of these animals still exist in pockets of the mainlaind (heavily
protected pockets, needless to say - and the developments that I referred to
that have no-cat covenants placed upon the properties are within cat
distance of such areas) their refuges are the offshore island. New Zealand's
breeding programmes for these now seriously endangered species, take place
almost entirely on offshore islands.

No New Zealander in their right mind is going to insist on their right to
take a dog or a cat on to Great Barrier Island, Maude Island or any of the
other islands that are either totally wildlife sanctuary, or largely
wildlife sanctuary. Anyone who did so would risk a lynch mob.

Personally, once they get the population up, I reckon the best way to ensure
that kakapo prosper is to allow people to have them as pets (dear fellow
Kiwis, please recognise this is at least slightly tongue in cheek!). They
are, quite frankly, the most endearing birds this side of anywhere, and with
a life span of 60 years, you wouldn't have to keep facing that pet grief
thing. Mind you, staying up at night to play with them would get a bit
tiring after a while.

http://www.terranature.org/kakapo.htm

;-)
rpl - 08 Aug 2004 23:50 GMT
> My dogs don't enter other people's properties, so why should a
> neighbour's cat be permitted to enter my property?

That's a little silly, isn't it? If there weren't fences, you'd have the
neighbours dogs in there all the time; bear in mind that to a dog a
fence is an obstacle, to a cat it's just part of the sidewalk.

And I'd rather have the cat visit; the most "damage" I'm likely to get
is a present buried in the garden.

pat
Lindsay Heinz - 09 Aug 2004 00:35 GMT
>> My dogs don't enter other people's properties, so why should a
>> neighbour's cat be permitted to enter my property?
>
>That's a little silly, isn't it?

If I thought it was silly then I wouldn't have said it. ;-)

>And I'd rather have the cat visit; the most "damage" I'm likely to get
>is a present buried in the garden.

I'd rather prevent repeated cat visits by using a trap.
Signature


Lindsay.

Ashley - 09 Aug 2004 07:24 GMT
in the garden.

> I'd rather prevent repeated cat visits by using a trap.

Leaving aside that that doesn't prevent the visit, as the cat can't be
captured unless it is on your property, why? I am genuinely interested to
know. And "dogs can't do it so why should cats" is no more a genuine reason
than "men can pee standing up, so why can't women".

What do you perceive is the harm done to you by having a cat wander across
your lawn? I am genuinely curious.
Lindsay Heinz - 10 Aug 2004 02:04 GMT
>in the garden.
>>
>> I'd rather prevent repeated cat visits by using a trap.
>
>What do you perceive is the harm done to you by having a cat wander across
>your lawn? I am genuinely curious.

It isn't the odd cat that wanders across my lawn during daylight hours
that bothers me, my dogs will scare them off anyway. What does bother
me and other neighbours is feral cats prowling around during the night
screaming and fighting amongst themselves causing the dogs in the
neighbourhood to bark which wakes everybody.

One neighbour who doesn't own a dog generally catches one or two cats
every night. Last Sunday night he set four traps subsequently catching
four cats which were all taken away Monday morning.
Signature


Lindsay.

Ashley - 10 Aug 2004 02:20 GMT
> It isn't the odd cat that wanders across my lawn during daylight hours
> that bothers me, my dogs will scare them off anyway.

Well, there you go. Your neighbours' cats probably aren't a problem at all.

What does bother
> me and other neighbours is feral cats prowling around during the night
> screaming and fighting amongst themselves causing the dogs in the
> neighbourhood to bark which wakes everybody.

Feral cats and neighbours' pets are two different things. Especially in NZ
and Aus where it's a wildlife preservation issue, I have no problem with
feral cats being caught and euthanised. Actually, I think if cats were
registered as dogs are, and the registration was signficantly less for
neutered cats than whole cats, along with trapping and euthanising of feral
cats, a large part of our wildlife problems would be solved.

> One neighbour who doesn't own a dog generally catches one or two cats
> every night. Last Sunday night he set four traps subsequently catching
> four cats which were all taken away Monday morning.

Sigh. I do despair sometimes. When you live in among people and their
animals, noise happens. It sounds a bit like someone who moves to the
country for peace and quiet and then complains about cocks crowing!

Sometimes there are cat fights (though, I realised that I didn't include in
a previous post, I also have no problem with local authorities in Australia
that have bylaws insisting that cats be kept inside from dawn to dusk so
they can't hunt vulnerable nocturnal creatures), sometimes it rains and
makes a noise on iron roofs, sometimes you can hear the neighbours' music.

Learning to relax about it all does everyone a lot more good than does
getting annoyed by neighbours not keeping their cats under control or
whatever.
Ashley - 10 Aug 2004 02:24 GMT
(though, I realised that I didn't include in
> a previous post, I also have no problem with local authorities in Australia
> that have bylaws insisting that cats be kept inside from dawn to dusk

Oops. Dusk to dawn, obviously. I need more sleep!
rpl - 10 Aug 2004 00:40 GMT
>>>My dogs don't enter other people's properties, so why should a
>>>neighbour's cat be permitted to enter my property?
>>
>>That's a little silly, isn't it?
>
> If I thought it was silly then I wouldn't have said it. ;-)

Wouldnt' be the first time the Enter key got hit before the sensecheck
was finished.

If your dog weighed 5 lbs and had retractable claws... and the
neighbour's cat weighed 100 lbs and didn't, then your neighbour'd be the
one complaining (and you'd both have a different series of problems but
that's another story).

That being said, you should of course expect the cat's owner to help out
if any damages occur, which is more than can be said for wild animals.

pat
Agua Girl - 17 Jul 2004 16:24 GMT
> Gday all
>
> I have an 8 Month old red tom kitten male.
>
> i purchased him when he was about 5 weeks old.

This is probably part of the problem  At 5 weeks they are still learning
proper play behaviour FROM THEIR MOM.  Too late now but knowing
he didn't get this crucial training might help you understand him better
now.

> He was a very naughty cat, always getting into trouble and doign things he
> isnt allowed to do, we disciplened him with a squirty bottle or lockign him
> in his room.

And these things aren't working right???  Like kids you have to do what
works.  He is still a kitten even though he looks full grown.  He has a lot
to learn and too much "punishment" at this stage is going to add to the
problem.  The idea of the squirt bottle is to startle the cat when they are
doing something wrong..not to discipline or punish.  It should be one
quick squirt out of nowhere.  As soon as they associate the action with
you then it's no longer effective.  Try substitution.  When he is doing
something you don't want such as biting, stop him and substitute an
acceptable
behaviour such as biting a toy.  Disengage your hand, put the toy in the
cats
grasp.  When mine jumps on a table I immediately pick her up and put her
in her tree.  I realize that getting up high is a normal cat behaviour so I
show her the proper place to get high...so to speak :-)

> He has plenty of toys.

He probably doesn't know how to use them...again...use the toys
for substitution.

> around 5 months old he became very angry, attacks us, bites and scratches at
> random but can be very affectionate.

Normal.  It's not anger, he is a male cat coming of age exerting dominance
over his "pride".

> at 6 months old we had him Desexed to try and stop this behaviour.

Good move, a month or two (or 3) earlier and you may have avoided
this situation altogether.  Still...it's not to late to retrain him or show
him
for the first time what appropriate play behaviour is since Mom didn't
get the chance.

> Now he attacks at random, attacks my other 10 year old female cat whos just
> too old for it.

Again, he is still a male cat asserting himself.  It's not necessarily
meanness..
he doesn't know any better since the discipline you tried didn't work with
this particular cat.  Again..substitution.  When he attacks you or the
other cat just grab a stuffed animal or cat toy and put it in place of the
object being attacked whether it be hand or older cat.

> attacks us and just doesnt seem to be disciplined..

He isn't "trained".  No one taught him proper play.  First thing you need to
do is quit thinking that you "discipline" animals.  They rarely make the
connection between doing something bad and some subsequent punishment.
It's not a person you can reason with.  "I am locking you up because you
attacked precious"  He just knows that he gets locked up and needs to
make the best of the rest of the time when he is out...needs to get all that
play energy out.

> He is locked in his room a lot these days and also runs away from my self,

No kidding..you lock him up..why wouldn't he run?

> he runs around the neighbourhood when he has been told not too and

Another red flag.  "told not too?"  Come on..it's a CAT.  A well trained
cat will come when it's called or may listen to what it's told but your cat
isnt' trained and to top it off he is still just a kitten.   If you want him
to
stay confined don't let him out or if you do, take him out on a leash.

> disciplined everytime he does as we are affraid he will get hit by a car. we
> have a very large backyard for him to play in thats fenced off with a tall
> colour bond fence but he has learned to tunnel underneeth it or jump over
> it.

Again...don't discipline him after he does something wrong and expect him
to make the connection especially since the discipline hasn't worked.  Try
and find another way to contain him.  There are cat proof fences and sprays
you can try.  Work on the problem, not the cat.