Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / General Topics / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Any advice?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Amanda Jones - 05 May 2004 02:35 GMT
We've decided, as far as Elijah's concerned, to keep him for the moment.
The vet said almost all cats can and are happy kept indoors, but if
Elijah's not one of them, he'll go to my sisters in Kent, where he can
come and go.

I registered Elijah as found with the police and RSPCA on the off-chance
that he was lost, not dumped. There seemed a slight chance of that,
because he was in generally good health and likes people so much.

I got a call at the weekend, which I returned today in trepidation <FX
"MINE! GERROF!> However, no-one's claimed him, but rather another kitten's
been found on Bedford Row.

We've been discussing the option of taking him  / her too. Elijah's very
active, loves company, and hates being left, which he is most of the day.
We thought that if we keep him the other cat will be company, and if he
goes to my sisters, it would be easier for two to move together.

The positive sides are obvious - any advice about the other side of it?
Are two cats double the work, or less than that? If they aren't siblings
(or if they are) what are the chances they'll get on? We don't want two
cats which tolerate each other, we'd want two which are close and happy in
the long term. What are the odds of this working out, given both are about
11-12 weeks old at the moment? Elijah's very friendly with other people,
but didn't like my parents' cats when he met them (though they didn't warm
to him, either!)

What's genuinely in Elijah's best interests, do people reckon?

Amanda
Gee - 05 May 2004 04:07 GMT
"Amanda Jones" <avjones@cix.co.uk> wrote in message

> We've decided, as far as Elijah's concerned, to keep him for the moment.
> The vet said almost all cats can and are happy kept indoors, but if
> Elijah's not one of them, he'll go to my sisters in Kent, where he can
> come and go.

We've been talking a lot about cats staying indoors in previous post when
you rescued Elijah . All I'm gonna add is that Elijah will be happy indoors.
Generally cats who have been previously outdoor can not adjust to indoor
living too well or too slowly, but at his age, Elijah will be 100% fine. You
could always take him out on a leash and harness, I think we discussed this
as well previously :)

> I registered Elijah as found with the police and RSPCA on the off-chance
> that he was lost, not dumped. There seemed a slight chance of that,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "MINE! GERROF!> However, no-one's claimed him, but rather another kitten's
> been found on Bedford Row.

If this is the same road where you found him and if the kitten is the same
age, there is a great chance they are from the same litter. Perhaps the
previous owner thought s/he'd keep the other kitten, then eventually dumped
it as well. Pathetic, but what can you do not knowing who they are.

> We've been discussing the option of taking him  / her too. Elijah's very
> active, loves company, and hates being left, which he is most of the day.
> We thought that if we keep him the other cat will be company, and if he
> goes to my sisters, it would be easier for two to move together.

Oh definitely get the other one. Not only cos they might be from the same
litter, but mainly as a company. Double the joy.

> The positive sides are obvious - any advice about the other side of it?

Well, the only one I can think of is cost of food and vet bills. But even
that is nothing comparing to what you get back.

> Are two cats double the work, or less than that?

Oh definitely less. They will play together a lot, bug you less, you will
enjoy them more, they will use up the energy on each other etc.

> If they aren't siblings
> (or if they are) what are the chances they'll get on? We don't want two
> cats which tolerate each other, we'd want two which are close and happy in
> the long term. What are the odds of this working out, given both are about
> 11-12 weeks old at the moment?

About 99.99%. Even if they are not from the same litter, kittens will bond
greatly and quickly at this age. Long hours of being alone only with each
other will strenghten the bond. I'd say they have practically 100% chance of
to of them being close. Sex doesn;t make a difference to them (as long as
you have them done later on of course :))

> Elijah's very friendly with other people,  but didn't like my parents'
cats when he met them (though they didn't warm  to him, either!)

With cats, there is always a period of adjusting which can last from a 2
days to 2 weeks, or longer in adult cats. With cats is all a territory thing
and a smell thing, so bare that in mind. Of course he wont get on straight
away with your parent cats, this just doesn;t happen. They smell different,
one was invading other's "territory" etc. Give them a little time and
they';ll be fine.

If you get the other kitten, either give them both a  bath with same cat
shampoo, or rub some tuna brine into their coats. The point of the exercise
is that they smell the same, as cats first sense they use is smell not sight
as we humans do. So making them smell the same will accelerate the process
of accepting one another, and new territory. Give Elijah lots of treats and
scratches when new kitten comes in, so he can associate it with something
positive. It;s his territory that is being invaded so he will need more
reassurance then the newcomer!

I wish you all the best, and enjoy the kittens. I know you say you might
give them to your sis, but I bet that within a month you will be so in love
with both of them you will not bare to part from them :) There is nothing in
this world nicer then watching kittens playing.

> What's genuinely in Elijah's best interests, do people reckon?

Oh definitly having a cat company. And staying indoors with you.

Gee

> Amanda
Amanda Jones - 05 May 2004 05:37 GMT
> We've been talking a lot about cats staying indoors in previous post
> when
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> this
> as well previously :)

The only reason I'm having second thoughts about this is because he keeps
trying to escape through the front door of our flat, and this morning it
took me about 10 minutes to leave because I kept having to collect him
from downstairs and return him (-:

> If this is the same road where you found him and if the kitten is the
> same
> age, there is a great chance they are from the same litter. Perhaps the
> previous owner thought s/he'd keep the other kitten, then eventually
> dumped
> it as well. Pathetic, but what can you do not knowing who they are.

And there was also a third, the one in the dustbin bag who was dead when I
found Elijah.

> Well, the only one I can think of is cost of food and vet bills. But
> even
> that is nothing comparing to what you get back.

I'm not bothered about that - most of the fixed costs (cat tree,
scratching post, etc) will be the same, and the extra costs aren't really
a problem.

> > Are two cats double the work, or less than that?
>
> Oh definitely less. They will play together a lot, bug you less, you
> will
> enjoy them more, they will use up the energy on each other etc.

Great! I just hoped that, with Elijah being here alone for 3 weeks now, he
wouldn't be set in his ways as the only feline inhabitant - although
there's a good chance he thinks he's human now, he likes to sit up on his
hind legs (-:

> About 99.99%. Even if they are not from the same litter, kittens will
> bond
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> as
> you have them done later on of course :))

there's no real way of telling whether they are siblings, and I reckon
we'll only ever be able to guess. I'm very interested in your opinion that
it doesn't really matter whether they are or aren't siblings in the long
run.

> . They smell
> different,
> one was invading other's "territory" etc. Give them a little time and
> they';ll be fine.

Great - thanks for your "integration" tips too! I'll crack open a tin of
tuna (-:

> I wish you all the best, and enjoy the kittens. I know you say you might
> give them to your sis, but I bet that within a month you will be so in
> love
> with both of them you will not bare to part from them :) There is
> nothing in
> this world nicer then watching kittens playing.

Even just watching one play is pretty good fun - he has a cat nip mouse he
absolutely adores!

Amanda
MaryL - 05 May 2004 05:37 GMT
> > We've been talking a lot about cats staying indoors in previous post
> > when
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Amanda

It will take a little time, but Elijah *will* adjust to being an indoor cat.
My first cat was feral (approximately 8 months old).  I originally had to
take great care because he would aim for the door as soon as it was opened,
and he was *very* fast.  However, he eventually became a wonderful companion
and showed absolutely no inclination to head for "the great outdoors."
During the period when he was trying to be an escape artist, I learned to
*back* out of the door.  I would lean over and gently cup his head in my
hand to prevent him from getting outside.  Likewise, I would take great care
when entering from outdoors to crack the door slightly and look for my cat's
location.

Gee posted some excellent advice.  I would also like to "second" the advice
to adopt the other kitten.  At that age, they will probably bond quickly.

MaryL
Scumball - 05 May 2004 08:18 GMT
You see, this strikes me as very cruel.

> It will take a little time, but Elijah *will* adjust to being an indoor cat.
> My first cat was feral (approximately 8 months old).  I originally had to
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> MaryL
Scumball - 05 May 2004 08:21 GMT
> You see, this strikes me as very cruel.

And almost psychotically selfish.

> > It will take a little time, but Elijah *will* adjust to being an indoor
> cat.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >
> > MaryL
Gene Royer - 05 May 2004 10:57 GMT
> > You see, this strikes me as very cruel.
>
> And almost psychotically selfish.

What an idiot you are, Scumbag.

--Geno
Scumball - 05 May 2004 14:54 GMT
> > > You see, this strikes me as very cruel.
> >
> > And almost psychotically selfish.
>
> What an idiot you are, Scumbag.

Not much of an argument, is it ?
Perhaps because there is no humane argument FOR imprisoning cats.

f.cking idiot.

> --Geno
Gee - 05 May 2004 15:37 GMT
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message

> Not much of an argument, is it ?
> Perhaps because there is no humane argument FOR imprisoning cats.

Tell me that when your beloved pet dies under the car like my QT did. Cats
in the cities do NOT live in their natural environment so you cannot expect
them to understand cars, poisons, nasty people and bunch of other dangers.
So yes, there is a major argument for keeping cats indoors. It's hardly
imprisonment, since they are getting only the best, as well as more then
just one tiny room. So get off your blinkers and see the world in the proper
light before you open your rude mouth again.

> f.cking idiot.

Oh yeah, I can see how THAT language will convince anyone that YOU are the
one they should believe. <sigh>

Gee
Scumball - 06 May 2004 00:34 GMT
> "Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> them to understand cars, poisons, nasty people and bunch of other dangers.
> So yes, there is a major argument for keeping cats indoors.

What an absurd 'argument'.
Straight from 'the frying pan's better than the fire' school of philosophy.

It's hardly
> imprisonment,

Obviously not in the book of someone who attempts to justify incarceration
in the way you have.
Imprisonment is defined as enforced confinement.
How is what you're doing anything other than that ?

since they are getting only the best, as well as more then
> just one tiny room. So get off your blinkers and see the world in the proper
> light before you open your rude mouth again.

How old are you ?

> > f.cking idiot.
>
> Oh yeah, I can see how THAT language will convince anyone that YOU are the
> one they should believe. <sigh>
>
> Gee
Gee - 06 May 2004 03:57 GMT
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message

> > > Perhaps because there is no humane argument FOR imprisoning cats.
> >
> > Tell me that when your beloved pet dies under the car like my QT did. Cats
> > in the cities do NOT live in their natural environment so you cannot
> expect them to understand cars, poisons, nasty people and bunch of other
dangers.
> > So yes, there is a major argument for keeping cats indoors.
>
> What an absurd 'argument'.
> Straight from 'the frying pan's better than the fire' school of philosophy.

Now THAT is an absurd comparasment to what I have stated. Which just goes to
prove that you didn;t understand my point. <sigh>

All I can say is that I do hope you do NOT have to go through loosing your
beloved pet to the car or some other above mentioned danger, even though
this seems the only way for you to realize what's right and what's wrong.
Oh, and why.

>  It's hardly imprisonment,
>
> Obviously not in the book of someone who attempts to justify incarceration
> in the way you have.

If that is what I am doing, that YOU are justifying murdering the cats, cos
you are allowing them to go out to get killed by some horrific means. So
what is better, murder or incarceration?

> Imprisonment is defined as enforced confinement.

For the benefit of the confined person? I didn't think so.

> How is what you're doing anything other than that ?

Simple, I am not punishing my cats by making their life miserable in jail. I
am giving them longer and healthier happy life. And keeping them alive,
which I foolishly didn;t do with QT and paid the ultimate price. Is that
what you really want for your cats?

> So get off your blinkers and see the world in the
> proper light before you open your rude mouth again.
>
> How old are you ?

Early thirties. Age has nothing to do with politness or wanting it.

Gee
MaryL - 05 May 2004 08:40 GMT
> You see, this strikes me as very cruel.

He was a wonderful cat and lived almost 20 years with me.  I lived in the
middle of a large city, and he would not have lived long if I had not
adopted him.  He was a long-haired cat, and he had mats so bad the the skin
was stretched tightly from one mat to another.  Soon after I adopted him, I
learned that he had UTI, so advanced that he was bleeding.  He underwent
surgery and treatment and lived to a ripe (and *happy*) old age.  The vet
said that he could not have survived long without treatment -- not to
mention the dangers from cars at such a busy intersection.  I adored him!

MaryL
Amanda Jones - 06 May 2004 00:05 GMT
> Gee posted some excellent advice.  I would also like to "second" the
> advice
> to adopt the other kitten.  At that age, they will probably bond
> quickly.

I'm going to, tomorrow! My b-f and flatmate agree, the former with
resignation, the latter with enthusiasm (-:

The problem with stopping Elijah escaping is that he isn't only greased
lightening, he's also very small - it's difficult to block the door.

Amanda
Gee - 05 May 2004 16:06 GMT
"Amanda Jones" <avjones@cix.co.uk> wrote in message

> The only reason I'm having second thoughts about this is because he keeps
> trying to escape through the front door of our flat, and this morning it
> took me about 10 minutes to leave because I kept having to collect him
> from downstairs and return him (-:

Yeah I know what you mean. Cats are naturally very curious and inquisitive
and will want to explore as much as poss. Him not being outside yet is
arousing his curiosity, especially that he sees you going there often. Can;t
remember if you said there was a way of making some sort of and extra
door/hallway I think you said no... In which case you probably need to
create some negative association with the door, perhaps even a cat repellant
spray. But yes, he could escape and get under the car. Perhaps a baby gate
with added wire mash? No he could climb it. Or maybe feed him just the
second before you leave so he is otherwise engaged.

I dunno. think of something he hates, then use it when you are coming in. My
cats hate the sound of aluminum foil, so perhaps you could shake it as you
are walking in to scare him off the door, providing he hates it of course.
But you get the drift.

> I'm not bothered about that - most of the fixed costs (cat tree,
> scratching post, etc) will be the same, and the extra costs aren't really
> a problem.

That's great, cos everything else is just benefits and joy.

>, he likes to sit up on his hind legs (-:

Sweet thing :) Keep taking those pictures. Kittenhood flyes fast :)

> > About 99.99%. Even if they are not from the same litter, kittens will
> > bond greatly and quickly at this age. Long hours of being alone only
with
> > each other will strenghten the bond. I'd say they have practically 100%
> > chance of to of them being close. Sex doesn;t make a difference to them
(as long
> > as you have them done later on of course :))
>
> there's no real way of telling whether they are siblings, and I reckon
> we'll only ever be able to guess. I'm very interested in your opinion that
> it doesn't really matter whether they are or aren't siblings in the long
> run.

No, because they are still kittens. Everything is still fun for them, still
exploring, developing  and most importantly still no hormones to make them
too territorial and mean. Well I suppose they have some hormones, but they
will not kick in properly till their sexual maturity at around 6-7 months
old for the boys I believe, hence the op being done at around 6 months in UK
or just before.

So you can drop 2 kittens together from different litter, and they will
accept each other fine, and will have months together to bond before they
become serious :) This is why adopting the kitten is much easier in general,
cos they can acclimate to anything new.

> Even just watching one play is pretty good fun - he has a cat nip mouse he
> absolutely adores!

Well since you are having fun with one, imagine doubling that fun :) I
thought I'd stop at 2, and now have 4. And a guest. Who is more here then at
his own home he he. And yes, I wouldn;t change it for the world! The more
the merrier.

Gee

> Amanda
Amanda Jones - 06 May 2004 00:05 GMT
> Can;t
> remember if you said there was a way of making some sort of and extra
> door/hallway I think you said no...

I don't think I said anything about it - there's not room inside the
flat,but he can't escape into the street. We're on the second floor, so he
can go down to the first and then to the ground, but there's a front door
to the common parts of the building.

> I dunno. think of something he hates, then use it when you are coming
> in. My
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> course.
> But you get the drift.

Coming in isn't a problem, he doesn't want to escape then, ever, because
there are PEOPLE COMING IN!!! It's people leaving he doesn't like - the
last person out of the flat in the morning has trouble, not the others.
Another kitten might well help this as he won't feel so lonely.
Gee - 06 May 2004 04:03 GMT
> > Can;t
> > remember if you said there was a way of making some sort of and extra
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> can go down to the first and then to the ground, but there's a front door
> to the common parts of the building.

Oh sorry, must have been someone else's post, whose door opened to the main
road :)

> Coming in isn't a problem, he doesn't want to escape then, ever, because
> there are PEOPLE COMING IN!!! It's people leaving he doesn't like - the
> last person out of the flat in the morning has trouble, not the others.
> Another kitten might well help this as he won't feel so lonely.

That's good then. And easier to fix. New kitten will probably make him stay
inside, although he may have already formed a habit where he's chasing after
you. Try the thing with giving food just before you leave :) Or throwing him
the toy to play with such as aluminum foil ball(they strangely like them) or
ping pong ball to fetch, then shut the door :)

Oh, and so glad about the new kitten's arrival tomorrow! You must be well
chaffed! What;s his name gonna be? Is it he? :)

Best wishes to y'all
Gee
Amanda Jones - 07 May 2004 18:17 GMT
> Try the thing with giving food just before you leave :) Or
> throwing him
> the toy to play with such as aluminum foil ball(they strangely like
> them) or
> ping pong ball to fetch, then shut the door :)

I've tried both - he gives me that, "Do you think I'm stupid? I can see
you've got your bag and you're wearing your suit!" look!

> Oh, and so glad about the new kitten's arrival tomorrow! You must be
> well
> chaffed! What;s his name gonna be? Is it he? :)

Yes - he's called Josiah (had to go with Elijah! Nearly went with Ahab,
but my mother pointed out that they were enemies in the Old Testament, and
that wasn't the best of omens (-:  )

Amanda
Scumball - 05 May 2004 08:17 GMT
I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
indoors.
It's ike caging birds.
Yes, cats adapt - but at what cost ?

> We've decided, as far as Elijah's concerned, to keep him for the moment.
> The vet said almost all cats can and are happy kept indoors, but if
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Amanda
MaryL - 05 May 2004 08:24 GMT
> I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> indoors.
> It's ike caging birds.
> Yes, cats adapt - but at what cost ?

Cats can live happily indoors if they are given good care and lots of toys
and attention.  They will also be much safer, at least in most areas of the
U.S.

MaryL
Wendy - 05 May 2004 12:26 GMT
> > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> MaryL

My Tigger was an indoor/outdoor cat for 8 years. She lost a fight to the
neighbors' younger cat and ended up at the vet with an abscess. After 2-3
days at the vet to get the abscess lanced and antibiotics they sent her home
to heal. She never asked to go out after that. She isn't afraid of the
outside as I've taken her out with me but she shows no interest in going out
on her own. I can prop the door open to bring in groceries and she shows no
interest at all. The only conclusion I can make is she decided her safe
outside days were over.

My Isabelle was found as a stray (she's 2). She has shown no interest in
going out since we got her and is nervous if I carry her outside.

Boots has been inside since he was 3 weeks old and totally freaks if I take
him out.

They have a large cat tree, lots of toys and each other to keep them
occupied. They all enjoy sunning on the bow window sill ... well the two
girls sun, Boots likes to chase the birds and attack the hanging plants (cat
safe plants of course).

Are they happy? They certainly seem to be and appear more contented than my
Mabel was as an indoor/outdoor cat all her l3 years of life.

We got Isabelle and found Boots last fall. They bonded almost immediately.
Tigger took a longer to take to them but I found them all sleeping on the
bed together yesterday and they all seem to hang out in the same room most
of the time. I would image the kittens should adjust to each other quicker
than older cats would.

W
Scumball - 05 May 2004 14:56 GMT
> > > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> days at the vet to get the abscess lanced and antibiotics they sent her home
> to heal. She never asked to go out after that.

Yeah right !
The fact that you resort to lying merely underlines your own (subconscious)
acknowledgement of the moral bankrupcy of incarcerating cats.

She isn't afraid of the
> outside as I've taken her out with me but she shows no interest in going out
> on her own. I can prop the door open to bring in groceries and she shows no
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> W
Gee - 05 May 2004 15:49 GMT
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message

> > > > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild
> nature, indoors. It's ike caging birds.

Hardly. How can you compare the birds cage to a house and possible a fenced
garden? It's nowhere near the same.

>> Yes, cats adapt - but at what cost ?

At cost of them staying alive and healthy. Which part of that can you not
understand? DO you also let your 4 year old out on the streets unsupervised?

> > My Tigger was an indoor/outdoor cat for 8 years. She lost a fight to the
> > neighbors' younger cat and  She never asked to go out after that.
>
> Yeah right !

And you know the behavior of HER cats better then her how.......??????????

> The fact that you resort to lying merely underlines your own (subconscious)
> acknowledgement of the moral bankrupcy of incarcerating cats.

Just because you know how to use thesaurus it doesn;t mean you know anything
about he cats. If you gonna discuss cats with people who love them, at least
research the subject first.

What other old fashioned and irrational believes must you have...

Gee
Wendy - 06 May 2004 12:11 GMT
She never asked to go out after that.

> Yeah right !
> The fact that you resort to lying merely underlines your own (subconscious)
> acknowledgement of the moral bankrupcy of incarcerating cats.

I don't know why you find this so hard to believe. It makes sense to me that
if an animal is to survive it knows not to revisit a situation that it has
found to be dangerous. Tigg was well aware that the cat next door had been
trying to claim our yard as her territory for a while. Tigg also found out
that she was no longer able to protect her territory so she chose to not put
herself in harms way again. As opposed to an outside only cat, Tigger had
choices and chose to stay inside, safe, and uninjured. The signs of an
intelligent cat if you ask me. Intelligence might not be something your well
acquainted with. Civility certainly isn't.

W
Scumball - 06 May 2004 15:56 GMT
> She never asked to go out after that.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> intelligent cat if you ask me. Intelligence might not be something your well
> acquainted with.

A rather feeble-minded attempt at an insult.
Are you a middle-aged housewife ?

> Civility certainly isn't.

If only you could extend the same civility to cat-kind.

> W
Scumball - 05 May 2004 14:52 GMT
> > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Cats can live happily indoors if they are given good care and lots of toys
> and attention.  They will also be much safer,

Yeah, that's great for YOU - but at what price to the cat ?

at least in most areas of the
> U.S.
>
> MaryL
James Marz - 06 May 2004 18:40 GMT
> > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> MaryL

My cats love being outside, they run about in the garden chasing field
mice and digging up moles to play with and eat. Is that considered
bad? In my opinion it is only natural instincts for a cat to want to
hunt and play outside. Cageing a cat up in a house is a terrible thing
to do. Who wants to be in jail?

James
Gee - 07 May 2004 01:24 GMT
"James Marz" <marzproject@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> My cats love being outside, they run about in the garden chasing field
> mice and digging up moles to play with and eat. Is that considered
> bad? In my opinion it is only natural instincts for a cat to want to
> hunt and play outside. Cageing a cat up in a house is a terrible thing
> to do. Who wants to be in jail?

Sure. So let them out to kill or be killed. Wonderful! <sigh>

Is that what you do as well? Since, as a caveman, your natural instinct is
to hunt, kill and beat up your woman?

Gee

> James
James Marz - 07 May 2004 15:20 GMT
> "James Marz" <marzproject@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> > James

You are the actually the one keeping your cats in your cave. It would
be quite funny if my cats somehow got killed by a mouse or mole by
playing freely in my garden. If you were a country boy you would
understand. There is very little traffic here.

Why did you go on the defensive and start the name calling for? That
was uncalled for Gee. I don't call you names for being homosexual, so
why call me names for letting my cats run footloose and fancyfree in
the garden?

James
Scumball - 07 May 2004 19:26 GMT
> > "James Marz" <marzproject@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >
> > > James

Ignore this idiot, James.
I've plonked him/her/it (delete as you will) as it's so wilfully obtuse.

> You are the actually the one keeping your cats in your cave. It would
> be quite funny if my cats somehow got killed by a mouse or mole by
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> James
Gee - 07 May 2004 23:24 GMT
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message

> Ignore this idiot, James.
> I've plonked him/her/it (delete as you will) as it's so wilfully obtuse.

Oh Scumbag, sorry- scumball, how funny YOU're saying that! hehe. The only
reason you may have plonked me is cos you didn;t like me disagreeing with
you and cos I kept winning the arguments - with ease, and you just can;t
seem to take it. And that makes ME obtuse - how....???? Honestly! <sigh>

Why can;t men ever take it when someone disagrees with them? Do you HAVE to
be right or what, the sky will fall down? And if anyone disagrees with you,
do you HAVE to attack them and inslut them or what, the sky will fall down?
My God, how sad!

Gee
Gee - 07 May 2004 23:04 GMT
"James Marz" <marzproject@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> > > My cats love being outside, they run about in the garden chasing field
> > > mice and digging up moles to play with and eat. Is that considered
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> You are the actually the one keeping your cats in your cave.

Being a caveman doesn;t mean you are keeping your cats in the cave James. It
means you have old-fashioned opinions.

> It would
> be quite funny if my cats somehow got killed by a mouse or mole by
> playing freely in my garden.

Fair enough. But ehat about things such as many times mantioned cars,
poisons, horrible people etc. They are all outdoors. Unless of course you
have a fenced up gardens and your cats can;t leave your garden, but surely
you would;ve stated that. Cos I have no objection against safe outdoors.

> If you were a country boy you would understand. There is very little
traffic here.

If you were a city boy you would hopefully understand there is plenty of
traffic here.

> Why did you go on the defensive and start the name calling for?

OMG you have to ask?
1. You approve of your cats murdering other innocent animals
2. You started name calling although indirect.
3. You insulted others by telling them that keeping their cats safe indoors
is a terrible thing and a "jail"

That was uncalled for Gee. I don't call you names for being homosexual, so
> why call me names for letting my cats run footloose and fancyfree in the
garden?

> James

Well I suppose I could apologize for calling you a caveman, but I wont, cos
the comparasment was obvious: you have the old fashioned opinion that
keeping cats indoors is a "terrible thing" and "Who wants to be in jail?"
and that it's perfectly OK to let the cats out to do what nature said
initially. Times change James, the life's moving on too fast and you have to
move with it and make changes that suit you and others including your pets.
But your opinions are still that cats should be let out, even though you've
read what other people including me said: I lost my beloved QT to the road,
so how you gonna tell me that I am now doing a terrible thing of keeping the
rest safely indoors now? But you not only refused to change your opinion
(which is your right I suppose) but also insulted others by saying what YOU
said, so this is why you got called what I called you, so in a way its not
really an insult, it's just means you have old fashioned opinions.

Also, as for "name calling", I am not the one who started with the
name-calling James. You may not have name-called me/others straight up, but
you have implied. Same thing. You said "Who wants to be in jail?" - what
does that sentence imply what people like me who keep the cats indoors are?
The fact is, that keeping cats indoors is to keep them safe, therefore
cannot possibly be "terrible", and that allowing the cats to hurt, kill and
eat other animals when they have food at home is way more barbaric then you
think. As much as I love my cats, I do not approve of them killing innocent
animals since they don't need to. Animals have already died for their cat
food, and no more lives are needed. Instead you not only allow them, but
happily watch them commit the murder and are smiling at it because of some
old fashioned opinion that cats should do this or that...! Despicable.

Lastly, I had to laugh at your attempt to namecall me back(right after you
moaned about me name calling you, he he). But here is a shocking twist in
the story - I am a woman! I do like man, so no you didn;t insult me at all.
But you did give me a right giggle, he he. (You judged by my nickname and
the possibility of me being a woman never entered your mind. A bit old
fashioned James, wouldn;t you say.)

So I will apologize, if you can prove to me that you are not old fashioned.
And no of course you don't have to.

Gee
James Marz - 08 May 2004 00:28 GMT
Gee wrote something life changing here somewhere:

>> You are the actually the one keeping your cats in your cave.

>Being a caveman doesn;t mean you are keeping your cats in the cave
James. It
>means you have old-fashioned opinions.

>> It would
>> be quite funny if my cats somehow got killed by a mouse or mole by
>> playing freely in my garden.

> Fair enough. But ehat about things such as many times mantioned cars,
> poisons, horrible people etc. They are all outdoors. Unless of course you
> have a fenced up gardens and your cats can;t leave your garden, but surely
> you would;ve stated that. Cos I have no objection against safe outdoors.

>> If you were a country boy you would understand. There is very
little
traffic here.

> If you were a city boy you would hopefully understand there is plenty of
traffic here.

>> Why did you go on the defensive and start the name calling for?

> OMG you have to ask?
> 1. You approve of your cats murdering other innocent animals

Well Gee.. I did until the Mouse Police showed up and arrested my cats
for serial murder. Apparently my cats didn't understand that killing
and eating mice was now illegal. I did try to explain to the cats that
this is 2004 and it is "old fashioned" for them to be chasing and
killing mice and moles. So now I have to find a good lawyer to defend
my cats. The district mouse attorney is going to try for the death
penalty, under penal code 761.32 which states that cats are no longer
allowed to kill mice outdoors, and penal code 761.33 which states that
cats can't kill mice indoors either. Wow!! Don't I feel stupid for
letting my cats outdoors to play in my garden!

> 2. You started name calling although indirect.

You are a stupid friggin idiot! Is that direct enough for ya?

> 3. You insulted others by telling them that keeping their cats safe indoors
> is a terrible thing and a "jail"

There is nothing wrong with keeping cats indoors, I just happen to let
mine go outside to play and be *real cats*. Instead of keeping them
indoors only.

>>That was uncalled for Gee. I don't call you names for being
homosexual, so
>> why call me names for letting my cats run footloose and fancyfree
in the
garden?

>> James

> Well I suppose I could apologize for calling you a caveman,

Nah, thats OK, If letting my cats kill mice is a sign of me being a
caveman then....Check out my club Gee.....*WHACK* *WHACK* Hey there
Gee I know you are unconscience, but what do you say, you let me drag
you back to my cave, to feed to my cats? No need for them to "murder"
mice if they can eat you instead.

> Animals have already died for their cat
> food, and no more lives are needed. Instead you not only allow them, but
> happily watch them commit the murder and are smiling at it because of some
> old fashioned opinion that cats should do this or that...! Despicable.

You are totally screwed up in the head! HaHaHa. Cats commiting
murder!! Cats kill their prey not murder! There is a difference Gee
(look it up). And yes I do sit and smile as I watch my cats move with
such prowess and stealth tracking their little prey like a lion
preying on a gazzele. They quietly and silently sneak up on a mouse
and pounce on them and injure them just enough that they don't move
out of pure fear. Then they will sit and play with the mouse until
they get hungry enough to eat it. Hey thats life! It has always been
this way Gee!!

> So I will apologize, if you can prove to me that you are not old fashioned.

<start> That would be hard to prove since I'm sending this out on
telegraph <stop>

James Marz
Gee - 08 May 2004 01:47 GMT
I never read a cr#pier reply in my life, ok, well since Bob Brenchley
really. I have no time for people like you who can't take anyone disagreeing
with them thus resort to insults instead of maturity.

I don;t need to comment back, cos you know what, you have just dug your own
grave.

Have a pleasant evening
Gee
Scumball - 08 May 2004 11:34 GMT
Nice reply, JM !
Difficult to understand people who adopt a carnivore and then complain that
it wants to hunt !
I guess they're incensed that their cats don't emulate their owners and
adopt their nutty, vegetarian doctrines.
Only goes to show how deranged they actually are.
Pity their poor, imprisoned pets.

> Gee wrote something life changing here somewhere:
>
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
>
> James Marz
Gee - 10 May 2004 00:41 GMT
> Nice reply, JM !

If you thought that was  a nice reply, you must be one of Bob Brenchleys
personalities.He he.

> Difficult to understand people who adopt a carnivore and then complain that
> it wants to hunt !

Nobody complained about cat WANTING to hunt. I stated it that it does not
NEED to hunt, and I don;t LIKE it to hunt, cos it does not NEED TO. Which
part of it did you not understand? Wanting, liking and needing are 3
completely different words, and if you don;t believe me you may consult your
best friend thesaurus :)

> I guess they're incensed that their cats don't emulate their owners and
> adopt their nutty, vegetarian doctrines.

You got to this deviated conclusion how?

> Only goes to show how deranged they actually are.

Well if your delusion was correct maybe this statement would be correct.
Which just shows how deranged your delusion is.

May I just add: game set and maych he he.

> Pity their poor, imprisoned pets.

Pity you when you start grieving after your run-over pet.

Gee
Agua Girl - 05 May 2004 14:18 GMT
> I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> indoors.
> It's ike caging birds.
> Yes, cats adapt - but at what cost ?

I am curious about the fundamentally wild nature
part.  I know the domestic cat was originally
bred from wild animals but then so were we so....
tell me how my domestic cat who runs and hides
under the bed if a noise outside scares her is
wild.  I think you are confusing our cats with
pumas

AG
Gee - 05 May 2004 15:41 GMT
> > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> AG

He he, nicely said. He is also confusing the city enviroment, cars, nasty
humans and poisons as cats NATURAL enviroment in which they should happily
and safely abode! Go figure.

Gee
Scumball - 06 May 2004 00:34 GMT
> > > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
> > > indoors.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > wild.  I think you are confusing our cats with
> > pumas

Read any decent cat-book.
Cats are at but one remove from the wild.
They do not need humans to survive.
They are highly self-sufficient and readily become feral.

> > AG
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Gee
Gee - 06 May 2004 04:14 GMT
"Scumball" <scumball@btinternet.com> wrote in message

> > > > I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild
> nature, indoors. It's ike caging birds.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> They do not need humans to survive.
> They are highly self-sufficient and readily become feral.

Nobody argues with that.  We all know that cats are the wildest of domestic
animals as someone nicely put it. We all know they could survive without the
humans. That is not the issue. The issue is that CITY is NOT an enviroment
for a cat to roam free with all the danger such as nasty people, cars and
poisons.

Also not all domesticated pets will be as streetwise as others, or would
want to live outside. Enviroment has changed a lot since the cats were first
domesticated. You are however living in the past thinking as if nothing has
changed and that nobody should change with times.

Gee
Ted Davis - 05 May 2004 17:46 GMT
>I think it's cruel to keep any animal with a fundamentally wild nature,
>indoors.
>It's ike caging birds.
>Yes, cats adapt - but at what cost ?

I agree ... provided you can provide the cat with a reasonable
facsimile of wild nature and can deal with losing the occasional cat
to preditors.  I live in the country and have nothing but woods and
pastures for miles in a couple of directions.  My cats are completely
free.  They and I are comfortable with that and with the relatively
low risk from humans, preditors, accidents, fights, and other factors
that are at low density because of the natural nature of the area.

However, if I lived downtown apartment in a big city letting them out
would be irresponsible and would likely annoy the neighbors.  Instead
of expecting to loose one every couple of years to coyotes, I would
expect to loose one every couple of months to traffic, angry
neighbors, or malicious children.

T.E.D. (tdavis@gearbox.maem.umr.edu)
SPAM filter: Messages to this address *must* contain "T.E.D."
somewhere in the body or they will be automatically rejected.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.