In two cases, 4 months apart, two different vets:
both estimated or said about $400 to examine, blood work, x-rays and to keep
cat until morning.
When cat was picked up, both vest presented bills for $1200. The 1st one
gave in little and was vary arrogant with weak justification, the 2nd vet,
after my complaint, reduced the bill to $440.
It is my conclusion, that a business practice of vets is to lure customer
in, then prey on their emotions to milk the maximum cash.
The cases above do not include the additional vet highly recommended
treatments, like blood transfusion, daily dialysis etc. which were highly
beyond our means.
I feel the vet industry is ripe for some sort of control as we have seen in
the human medical industry and maybe a better and more appropriate example
is the rules and conditions mortuaries now have to operate under. That
business in the past, like vets today, manipulated and influenced those who
were in grief, feigning shock that you wouldn't want to have the best money
can buy for your loved ones.
I am left with an extremely fowl taste of the vet industry and I hope
someday reforms as seen by mortuary and medical industry can become more
prevalent from state to state for vetinary. It is shameful and disgusting
the way vets feed on human emotion to line their pockets.
Xmar - 04 Apr 2004 21:56 GMT
I dont understand...
Did the vets do more than what you had authorized???
What sort of things were listed on the bill that they did that you did
not authorize them to do.
was it an itemized bill??
My experience with vets has been different, although I make sure they
understand what I have and have not authorised them to do.
> In two cases, 4 months apart, two different vets:
> both estimated or said about $400 to examine, blood work, x-rays and to keep
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> prevalent from state to state for vetinary. It is shameful and disgusting
> the way vets feed on human emotion to line their pockets.
Amy Gray - 05 Apr 2004 00:11 GMT
>I feel the vet industry is ripe for some sort of control as we have seen in
>the human medical industry and maybe a better and more appropriate example
>is the rules and conditions mortuaries now have to operate under.
The solution: vote with your feet and find a different vet. Believe
it or not there are some good vets. Ask around and find out what
other pet owners do in your area.
If you live in an area like New York city consider going to New Jersey
or Connecticut.
But yes there are some excellent vets out there who don't take
advantage of you.
Bear in mind if your vet is in a city like New York then their rent is
through the roof.
'cedes - 05 Apr 2004 09:30 GMT
"I am left with an extremely fowl taste". Hmmmmmm.....Must have stopped
by KFC first.. lol
M.C. Mullen - 05 Apr 2004 08:12 GMT
| I am left with an extremely fowl taste of the vet industry and I hope
| someday reforms as seen by mortuary and medical industry can become more
| prevalent from state to state for vetinary. It is shameful and disgusting
| the way vets feed on human emotion to line their pockets.
It has not been my choice (I got different pets through different vets) but
in the past I've got to know
11 different vets and read about two more very dubious ones in our town in
the paper.
I must say some were very arrogant, some were over expensive, some treated
the wrong way, some didn't really seem to like pets, they were more of a
ware to them, some just didn't care much.
I am very happy with my original vet but she cannot do complicated things
because she hasn't got the machines. Then I pick the one that takes the time
to explain things to me and if possible is not too expensive. I also like it
when a vet tries simple treatments first and only afterwards moves on to the
costly treatments.
I think it's best to share experiences with friends and also to compare
bills.
When I don't like a vet I just move on without discussion. This means if
there's an emergency I'm still in the file which might (although I hope not)
be useful some time.
Over the past years I have come to the conclusion that with most people
money is their main motivation. Then spending it and enjoying much free time
:-(
Carola
Amy Gray - 05 Apr 2004 19:48 GMT
>some didn't really seem to like pets,
Why would someone become a vet if they don't like pets?
I would think twice about taking my cat to someone who
hates cats.
>When I don't like a vet I just move on without discussion. This means if
>there's an emergency I'm still in the file which might (although I hope not)
>be useful some time.
I've tried many vets in the area, most were very good, only found
one that was really bad. If it is a true emergency there is an
animal hospital that is open 24/7 and is about the same distance away
as my usual vet. And at one time of urgent need the vet recommended
getting the cat to the above animal hospital.
Alot depends on how the local community feels about animals. Around
here it is a very pro animal state.
If you can that is one of the things to consider when you
look to move to a certain geographical area. If you aren't
comfortable with the vets in that area then consider moving if
you can.
That is why I suggest when you think about moving to an
area before you buy a house rent an apartment for
a few months to see if you like the area.
Luvskats00 - 06 Apr 2004 02:03 GMT
Most, not all vet, provide patient/customers with an estimate. If other
procedures/tests/x-rays need be done as extra measures, there usually is an
understanding between the bill paying owner/guardian and the vet/vet's
receptionist..a phone call to ask the owner if he/she wants additional work
done..alternatives, etc. To quote $400 and up it to $1,000 with no
communication in-between is unethical and perhaps against the law.
DanGW04 - 06 Apr 2004 04:56 GMT
thats what we thought to..against the law.
> Most, not all vet, provide patient/customers with an estimate. If other
> procedures/tests/x-rays need be done as extra measures, there usually is an
> understanding between the bill paying owner/guardian and the vet/vet's
> receptionist..a phone call to ask the owner if he/she wants additional work
> done..alternatives, etc. To quote $400 and up it to $1,000 with no
> communication in-between is unethical and perhaps against the law.
Gray asphalt - 14 Apr 2004 04:53 GMT
: In two cases, 4 months apart, two different vets:
: both estimated or said about $400 to examine, blood work, x-rays and to keep
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
: prevalent from state to state for vetinary. It is shameful and disgusting
: the way vets feed on human emotion to line their pockets.
We have had exactly the experience you describe in two
out of three vets with the third to a lesser degree. One told
us our male cat needed to be neutered (this was a vet) and
when I took him back to the animal shelter, where he was
supposed to be neutered, vaccinated, etc. they told me that
he had indeed been neutered and that the vet could not have
been mistaken, so that leads me to believe that she was
lying.
Gray asphalt - 14 Apr 2004 04:56 GMT
A good example of this is selling pre-op blood testing,
IV, and extra pain meds for male cats being neutered
since they don't even need stiches.
spenzdad - 14 Apr 2004 05:36 GMT
they definately are in a ripoff mod. I wish there was a governing body to
prevent regulate them and prevent them from preying on once grief.
> A good example of this is selling pre-op blood testing,
> IV, and extra pain meds for male cats being neutered
> since they don't even need stiches.
M.C. Mullen - 14 Apr 2004 08:05 GMT
| A good example of this is selling pre-op blood testing,
| IV, and extra pain meds for male cats being neutered
| since they don't even need stiches.
Even I can tell if a tom's neutered or not, and I'm not a professional at
all!
When I got our tom vaccinated it cost very much. I wondered about the bill
and said that my usual vet costs less than half. The vet went mad and said
angrily that he'd vaccinated this and that too. Stuff I didn't even ask
for!!
Carola
Tina and Shane - 21 Apr 2004 02:59 GMT
What does an IV, blood testing, and pain meds have to do with stitches?
> | A good example of this is selling pre-op blood testing,
> | IV, and extra pain meds for male cats being neutered
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Carola
Gray asphalt - 21 Apr 2004 04:19 GMT
: What does an IV, blood testing, and pain meds have to do with stitches?
The procedure is a simple one, so the pain meds
aren't necessary. The no stitches is just an example
to show that it's not as complicated as a female operation.
me - 22 Apr 2004 00:35 GMT
More money
> What does an IV, blood testing, and pain meds have to do with stitches?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > Carola
Amanda Jones - 03 May 2004 19:47 GMT
> Even I can tell if a tom's neutered or not, and I'm not a professional
> at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> angrily that he'd vaccinated this and that too. Stuff I didn't even ask
> for!!
I had our new stray kitten checked over, health tests, given worm tablets
and a bottle of ear mite stuff, and his 8 week vaccinations, and all of
the cost about ?60, which seemed pretty reasonable. That's in SE London.
Amanda