>> Does anyone know of a rescue group that uses an adoption application that
>is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>about criticism over "strict" standards. Those standards are intended to
>protect the cats, and some people just don't understand that.
My reply is to appologize for the customer being upset about the
standards. I then, quickly explain that the shelter's policies are in
order to ensure that the animal is a good match for the adopter and
that the director is the person who sets the standards. In the very
rare occation where waiving the standard would make NO difference, I
sometimes offer to let them talk to a supervisor. If waiving the
standard would degrade the adoption process, I do not offer that as an
option. If they insist, I do call a supervisor.
> I do agree
>that it is important for the person who accepts the applications to be
>courteous and to explain the reasons why you have certain expectations, but
>(unless you have some very unusual questions) I would not back down simply
>because some people become annoyed. The fact is that shelters and rescue
>groups face this type of complaint on a regular basis.
Agreed.
>Some people will
>even imply that "any" home is "better than death," and they don't understand
>why there are any screening processes.
They think that, but it is not true. A slow, painful death is worse
than a quick, humane one.
>I adopted Duffy from a shelter a
>little more than a year ago. I made my initial contact by phone after
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>unannounced inspections from shelter personnel, what my attitude is toward
>declawing (opposed!),
I believe the issue of declawing to be open to debate. I personally do
not think it is cruel. Please don't get this thread off on that
subject. It is like religion or politics, there will always be
opposing views and both sides are convinced they are right.
> *why* I wanted to adopt a special needs cat, and
>several other questions. I was immediately approved and was given a date to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>a pet in hand. Instead, you want someone who will offer the cat or kitten a
>loving home and who is willing to take the time to offer special care.
Come on, how long can this take? If you are unwilling to give up an
hour of your time, I do not think you would make a good enough pet
owner.
Also, we have vet people on staff to do the final exam immediately
upon adoption, five minute wait.
>This was a rather long-winded way to answer your question, and I departed
>completely from you query about a points system -- but I would like to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>intangibles involved in assessing potential catguardians that a points
>system could become too rigid.
Agreed, very good point.
> Incidentally, I can see some of my own
>attitude in a recent situation (*not* related to adoption) coming home to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>MaryL
To be honest, some of our questions and processes are NOT rational :-)
They could be done differently. But, then again, I'm not the director
and he/she needs to be in charge. I will not agree with everything,
but that is not disloyal, just opinion.
We also telephone the landlord to get approval if you rent. That
causes great termoil at times. Usually it means the person is NOT
allowed a pet and lied on the application.
We also require animals to be indoor pets, not outdoor. Yes, there is
quite a contraversy about that, but it is the law in almost every city
and town in our area. Pets must be restrained to their own yard and
dogs are ment to be with people, not tied up in the back yard 24/7.
That alone, is enough of a reason for it.
Could you scan the application for us to see? It might help other
people in their efforts. Would you like to see a scan of our
application? I'd make one, if wanted.
MaryL - 13 Mar 2004 19:23 GMT
> Please don't get this thread off on that
> subject.
I was only giving a run-down of some of the questions that were asked at the
shelter, either on the questionnaire or in person (and I did not object to
any of them).
> > *why* I wanted to adopt a special needs cat, and
> >several other questions. I was immediately approved and was given a date to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Also, we have vet people on staff to do the final exam immediately
> upon adoption, five minute wait.
In my case, this took quite a bit of time -- but the point I was trying to
make is that shelter policies were reasonable and are designed to protect
the cat. If you will re-read my message, I think you will find that I was
not trying to complain about time expended. I was *defending* the shelter's
screening process, not challenging it. Now, how could it have taken so much
time in my case? You are correct that I did not need much time at the
shelter (possibly 45 minutes the first time and much less the second time --
but much of that time was actually spent holding and petting Duffy, not
undergoing an interview process). However, I adopted Duffy after I saw his
picture on Petfinder and realized that he had been at the shelter for 3
months. The shelter is close enough that they will adopt to people in my
community, but it is not the local shelter. The drive to the shelter was a
little more than an hour, another hour to return home, then repeat that when
I went back to pick him up 3 days later. But, again, please notice that
this is *not* a complaint -- I was trying to say that the extra time spent
was something that anyone who is serious about adopting a pet should be
willing to commit to the adoption process.
> >MaryL