> -I did feel bad for them when they were declawed since they were in
> obvious pain for a couple of days.
> BUT, they did get over just fine and they're normal and happy like
> they were before the declaw.
Just like a human being would be normal and happy after getting over the
pain of having his (or her) fingers removed.
> -The reason I did the back claws 'cause I'm pretty committed to
> keeping them indoors all the time so the argument that they needed
> them for defense wasn't needed in my case - 'cause they never get
> outside. I declawed the back 'cause I read other posts where the back
> paws were getting destructive and they were clawing people with 'em.
He mutilated some kittens allegedly because he read "other posts" which
said it was a good idea. He ignored the contrary posts written by "cat
nazis." In other words, he mutilated some kittens because he needed cute
little harmless playthings.
Apparently, the "cat nazis" are people who actually know something about
cats.
> -I'd recommend you try soft paws first - those glue-on nail caps.
The author seems to think that the only possible correction is to
physically alter the cat. I guess such shallow minds are why laws are
necessary.
> If you do decide to go the declaw route, make sure you do it while
> they're still kittens
> -I still have no regrets on declawing them,
Ignorance is bliss.
> I'd do it again
And if it is illegal then come here and talk about it so I can have the
pleasure of turning you in.
> After declawing them, they are so wonderful now never damaging any
> furniture and so easy to play with, never getting scratched up when
> they need a bath ...
And your playthings can no longer properly exercise. They can never grip
or climb anything again. They can no longer defend themselves. Your
playthings will be dead meat if they ever get outside or if a dog gets
inside. If your helpless playthings escape you or for whatever other
reason end up outside, they will be either killed or beaten up and
perpetually chased away from food sources until they die.
> However, to appease all the cat nazis out there --
Do whatever you want to do. It's your life.
This group is for discussion. You're not interested in discussion,
apparently you never were. Everyone who disagrees with you is in your
opinion a Nazi. (By the way, Usenet knows that argument as a loser. When
you are a loser, you call your opposition Nazis.) You have made up your
mind, committed the dirty deed, and now your duty is to persuade others to
take your wayward course seemingly to somehow lessen your guilt.
If you are not a troll, you sure do a good imitation.
> these are the last cats I'll own so I won't be declawing anymore cats
> for the rest of my life nor help solve the overpopulation problem by
> adopting anymore.
If you were really interested in helping solve the overpopulation problem
and did not just fancy the idea of owning cute little playthings, you might
have considered adopting de-clawed adult cats. I guess you are hinting at
being elderly. Why do you require kittens? Why not help animals which are
more likely to be destroyed? I suppose you do not want dogs because they
are more difficult to take care of. And now you need someone to talk to
about your cute little playthings. I wouldn't expect much camaraderie
here, at least not while your only objective is to promote de-clawing, seek
forgiveness, play the troll, and/or whatever it is you are trying to
accomplish.
Out.
> Homer
>
> Path:
newsdbm01!newsdbm01.news.prodigy.com!newscon07.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.n
ews.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed
.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
> From: homer_simpson451@hotmail.com (Homer)
> Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.misc
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Message-ID: <f5efe25a.0307071705.3adf92b@posting.google.com>
> References: <f5efe25a.0307062329.74483138@posting.google.com>
<20030707065716.25898.00000142@mb-m21.aol.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.169.233.138
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1057626357 13273 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2003
01:05:57 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Jul 2003 01:05:57 GMT
> Xref: newsmst01.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.misc:78175
Homer - 16 Jul 2003 02:23 GMT
> Just like a human being would be normal and happy after getting over the
> pain of having his (or her) fingers removed.
And just like a human being would be normal after getting over the
pain of having his balls removed or her ovaries cut out.
> He mutilated some kittens allegedly because he read "other posts" which
> said it was a good idea. He ignored the contrary posts written by "cat
> nazis." In other words, he mutilated some kittens because he needed cute
> little harmless playthings.
I'm sure glad I ignored people with opinions like yourself otherwise
I'd be stuck with some razor sharp playthings.
> The author seems to think that the only possible correction is to
> physically alter the cat. I guess such shallow minds are why laws are
> necessary.
I believe you are the one with the shallow mind to think you can get
into the business of others by forcing your *morals* upon others and
making asinine laws. Next thing you'll do is outlaw criticising the
president.
> And if it is illegal then come here and talk about it so I can have the
> pleasure of turning you in.
It's only illegal in West Hollywood as far as I know and I'm glad I
don't live there.
> And your playthings can no longer properly exercise. They can never grip
> or climb anything again. They can no longer defend themselves. Your
> playthings will be dead meat if they ever get outside or if a dog gets
> inside. If your helpless playthings escape you or for whatever other
> reason end up outside, they will be either killed or beaten up and
> perpetually chased away from food sources until they die.
That's 'cause I'm a responsible owner and make sure they have a full
and happy life inside the house. I'm not careless enough that they
ever accidently escape.
> Do whatever you want to do. It's your life.
> This group is for discussion. You're not interested in discussion,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> take your wayward course seemingly to somehow lessen your guilt.
> If you are not a troll, you sure do a good imitation.
Whatever dude, you're entitled to your opinion and I'm to mine.
Obviously anyone who has a differing opinion than yourself is not
participating in a *discussion* and only being a *troll*
> If you were really interested in helping solve the overpopulation problem
> and did not just fancy the idea of owning cute little playthings, you might
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> forgiveness, play the troll, and/or whatever it is you are trying to
> accomplish.
I don't expect any camaraderie from the likes of you. I see myself as
doing a service to the cat owners by posting another viewpoint. AND I
see that I have had a hand in helping the overpopulation problem by
giving some cats a good, loving home.
You are a fine example why others like myself don't post their
opinions too often because you bully and resort to personal attacks.
What does my age matter anyway, if I happen to be elderly or not does
not have any merit on this *discussion* You have a stereotype of old
people?
You think you can scare people with the paltry knowledge of Usenet
that you have. So you can see posting headers and track where people
have posted to. Whoop dee doo bugger boy, I can see yours too.
Obviously you have delusions of grandeur.
moonglow minnow - 16 Jul 2003 17:14 GMT
Homer howled at the moon, then scrawled thusly upon the aether:
>> Just like a human being would be normal and happy after getting over
>> the pain of having his (or her) fingers removed.
>
> And just like a human being would be normal after getting over the
> pain of having his balls removed or her ovaries cut out.
at least they could function normally as soon as they've recovered...
it's rather difficult to type, play piano, write, climb trees, etc. with
partially amputated digits. i've seen someone who can, to a certain
extent and with great difficulty, but it was a matter of losing much of
her fingers or losing her entire hand, not overly sharp fingernails.
if you could never, ever get laid and weren't physically capable of
satisfying yourself, but had the option of a simple surgery that would
eliminate the frustration forever, as well as reduce the risk of certain
cancers (and painful or even dangerous ovarian cysts if female), wouldn't
you go for it?
>> He mutilated some kittens allegedly because he read "other posts"
>> which said it was a good idea. He ignored the contrary posts written
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I'm sure glad I ignored people with opinions like yourself otherwise
> I'd be stuck with some razor sharp playthings.
or the occasional hassle of trimming nails and gluing on nail covers that
allow your cats to climb and stretch and scratch and scent mark with
their paws as they would normally do without doing any damage to you or
your furniture. train them to it early enough with the right rewards,
and, like grooming, many cats may even consider it a treat. if that's
completely impractical because, say, you're immunosuppressed and an
accidental scratch while trimming nails and replacing covers would
endanger your life, sure, declaw rather than get rid of the cats, but
short of that there are usually far more humane options to protect
yourself and your furnishings from kitty damage.
>> The author seems to think that the only possible correction is to
>> physically alter the cat. I guess such shallow minds are why laws
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> making asinine laws. Next thing you'll do is outlaw criticising the
> president.
there's quite a large difference between criticism (which, unless
slanderous, directly harms no one and often is to the greater benefit
when people choose to listen) and a more often than not unnecessary
surgical procedure which carries with it significant risks.
>> And your playthings can no longer properly exercise. They can never
>> grip or climb anything again. They can no longer defend themselves.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and happy life inside the house. I'm not careless enough that they
> ever accidently escape.
so, you lock them in a room previous to every time you open your door for
any reason? your house is completely fireproofed, or you would sooner
allow them to die than escape? you never have surprise visitors, and
you're the only person who will ever open your door? you keep your door
lokced at all times to prevent a curious kitty from turning the knob? you
have arrangements with someone who knows your cats well to keep them as
indoor pets should something happen to you?
there's always the possibility of escape, however remote. when my cat
escaped, i assure you it was not due to carelessness on my part. indeed,
he managed to get past more than one closed door. i'm glad that he had
the means to hunt and defend himself, else he may have returned far more
injured and ill than he did, or he may not have been able to return at
all.
> I don't expect any camaraderie from the likes of you. I see myself as
> doing a service to the cat owners by posting another viewpoint. AND I
> see that I have had a hand in helping the overpopulation problem by
> giving some cats a good, loving home.
thank you for providing a loving home to your feline companions. i just
hope that in future SoftPaws (or similar) training is tried in as many
cases as possible before declawing is seriously considered.
Maeve... with typos courtesy of Fevs the lapkitty, helping me type...

Signature
throw the baby out with the bathwater to reply by e-mail
~*~ http://volatiledreams.deep-ice.com ~*~
666-A -- The Tenant of the Beast.
kaeli - 16 Jul 2003 20:06 GMT
> > I don't expect any camaraderie from the likes of you. I see myself as
> > doing a service to the cat owners by posting another viewpoint. AND I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> hope that in future SoftPaws (or similar) training is tried in as many
> cases as possible before declawing is seriously considered.
If someone wants to save lives but feels they cannot train a cat
properly, there are thousands of already declawed cats in shelters
nation wide.
Save a life - adopt! :)
-------------------------------------------------
~kaeli~
There is no justification or rationalization
for mutilation. Ban declawing as inhumane.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
-------------------------------------------------
WOW! A great solution! Tell me more about declawing.
I have an adopted "barn cat" that refuses to accept the house as her
only domain. She prefers to run with wild dogs, the wild animals
found in the country, and the abandoned dogs dumped by animal lovers
refusing to use an animal shelter.
As long as my cat can protect herself against the ravages of
nature and reality, I would love to use de-clawing as a method of
teaching my cat to not claw furniture. I encourage you, tell me more
about how safe my cat will be when offered your solution of removing
her natural defenses in an effort to reduce clawing furniture.
Bill
>As unpopular as my solution was, here's my experience with declawing:
>-I did feel bad for them when they were declawed since they were in
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>help solve the overpopulation problem by adopting anymore.
>Homer
Tina Laitinen - 19 Apr 2004 04:30 GMT
> WOW! A great solution! Tell me more about declawing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> >help solve the overpopulation problem by adopting anymore.
> >Homer
Please please don't declaw your cat. It's mean and cruel. There are other
ways of training your poor kitty. People for the Ethical Treatment of
animals have some good ideas on their site. Also you can clip your cats
nails. I do it all the time with our male. Also you can try a scratching
post with rope instead of carpet and you can also try citrus spray whereever
the cat scratches the most. You can also spay/neuter your barn cat. It's
urges will more than likely go away. You can also buy a product called Soft
Paws. They just glue right over the natural claws.
Kristine Kochanski - 19 Apr 2004 12:58 GMT
>WOW! A great solution! Tell me more about declawing.
My god, PLEASE tell me you're joking/trolling. Declawing is
mutilation, short and simple. It's illegal in the UK for that very
reason. If your furniture is more precious than your cat's wellbeing,
then don't have a cat. Alternatively, if you're prepared to put in the
effort, there are a million different ways to dissuade a cat from
clawing furniture - water pistols, scent products, sticky tabs,
distraction etc etc
Please, please think about what you're doing to your cat if you have
the ends of its paws hacked off - it's not like snipping their nails,
it's like someone removing the end bones in your fingers. Not only
does it impede the cat's defence and movement mechanisms, it can also
have psychological consequences.
The cat isn't being destructive for the sake of it - scratching and
scenting its territory is intrinsic to cat behaviour.
Mariah Nichols - 04 May 2005 19:43 GMT
I agree wholeheartedly. My cats may claw but what if they get out and need
to defend themselves? Declawing is NOT the answer.