First of all, this is NOT an advertisement. I'm just relating to all my fellow
lazy humans that hate to handle the LB everyday about a "discovery" I just
found.
I've owned several littermaids over the past 7 years, b/c the damn things keep
breaking, but even though its cost prohibitive, I keep buying a new one b/c I'm
lazy and Hank likes a clean place to do his business.
The most annoying thing about the littermaid (to me at least) is the damn thing
going off at 2am and getting stuck on a tough clump -- and then the rake goes
back and forth until I get out of bed and correct it. I was browsing on ebay
and stumbled across this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2358063127&category=29853
It's basically a more powerful transformer that does indeed have A LOT more
power then the standard transformer. The seller claims it has worked for 1.5
years with no problems, and I'm willing to accept that claim, but I don't know
about their claim of having triple the power is accurate (see my calculations
below).
The thing costs $40 shipped, which is a bit pricey, so since I bit the bullet
and bought one, I'm going to share the technical specs so if you want to find
your own elsewhere (for a lot less $$$ I bet) feel free to do so.
Booster (24V 600ma) vs. Littermaid (12V 500ma)
-----
Power calculation follows:
the booster generates 24V *.6A = 14.4 Watts
littermand std generates 12V *.5A = 6 Watts
14.4/6 = 2.4, so the booster is 2.4 times more powerful than the one that comes
with the littermaid.
I don't know why LM uses such a "weaker" adapter, but production costs and
safety might come into play. Please don't blame me if your kitty gets hurt in
the thing if it goes off while he is in it.
Cheryl - 07 Nov 2003 03:25 GMT
Please don't blame me if
> your kitty gets hurt in the thing if it goes off while he is in it.
If you have to post this disclaimer, it is all the more reason not to
mess with it. Two minutes or less per day or even twice a day is not
worth the chance that a cat will get hurt. Do it the old fashioned
way.
Cary Kittrell - 07 Nov 2003 03:37 GMT
<In news:78174232.0000f78c.026@drn.newsguy.com,
<Mike <dontspamthecat@boo.ya> composed with style:
<
<Please don't blame me if
<> your kitty gets hurt in the thing if it goes off while he is in it.
<
<If you have to post this disclaimer, it is all the more reason not to
<mess with it. Two minutes or less per day or even twice a day is not
<worth the chance that a cat will get hurt. Do it the old fashioned
<way.
<
<
Sliced cat is NOT the next best thing after sliced bread.
-- cary
Mike - 07 Nov 2003 03:56 GMT
Life itself comes with no disclaimers. I personally don't think this is any
MORE dangerous then the regular littermaid for your standard kitty, but then
again, I'm no engineer.
>Please don't blame me if
>> your kitty gets hurt in the thing if it goes off while he is in it.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>worth the chance that a cat will get hurt. Do it the old fashioned
>way.
Jon C - 07 Nov 2003 03:53 GMT
> First of all, this is NOT an advertisement. I'm just relating to all my fellow
> lazy humans that hate to handle the LB everyday about a "discovery" I just
> found.
It'll power through the kitty, too.
You do realize that a simple trip to Radio Shack will yield the same product
for about $10 instead of $35?
Mike - 07 Nov 2003 04:11 GMT
>You do realize that a simple trip to Radio Shack will yield the same product
>for about $10 instead of $35?
Well since the seller wouldn't post the ratings of the transformer, I had no
idea what it was until I got the thing in the mail. I posted the specs here so
YOU can get for for $10 instead of $40. I guess no good deed goes unpunished.
Jon C - 07 Nov 2003 23:18 GMT
You can look at the transformer to see the voltage rating, then go to Rat
Shack to buy one that supplies more voltage.
This works with anything run by an electric motor.
> >You do realize that a simple trip to Radio Shack will yield the same product
> >for about $10 instead of $35?
>
> Well since the seller wouldn't post the ratings of the transformer, I had no
> idea what it was until I got the thing in the mail. I posted the specs here so
> YOU can get for for $10 instead of $40. I guess no good deed goes unpunished.
Joe Canuck - 07 Nov 2003 16:54 GMT
> The thing costs $40 shipped, which is a bit pricey, so since I bit the bullet
> and bought one, I'm going to share the technical specs so if you want to find
> your own elsewhere (for a lot less $$$ I bet) feel free to do so.
And there is the biggest problem with the automated devices that are
more beneficial to humans than they are to felines.

Signature
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck
Booyah - 07 Nov 2003 18:16 GMT
>And there is the biggest problem with the automated devices that are
>more beneficial to humans than they are to felines.
Come again? I love my littermaid, and my cat does too. It saves me time and he
has a clean box EVERY time he has to go.
Joe Canuck - 07 Nov 2003 20:58 GMT
>>And there is the biggest problem with the automated devices that are
>>more beneficial to humans than they are to felines.
>
> Come again? I love my littermaid, and my cat does too. It saves me time and he
> has a clean box EVERY time he has to go.
Until the one time he gets trapped or injured by it... that is the risk.
For some it is an acceptable risk.

Signature
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck
Booyah - 07 Nov 2003 21:54 GMT
>Until the one time he gets trapped or injured by it... that is the risk.
>
>For some it is an acceptable risk.
It's a minimal risk compared to letting your kitty outside the house!
Joe Canuck - 07 Nov 2003 22:51 GMT
>>Until the one time he gets trapped or injured by it... that is the risk.
>>
>>For some it is an acceptable risk.
>
> It's a minimal risk compared to letting your kitty outside the house!
For me it isn't an acceptable risk... and neither is letting kitty
outside of the house. So, kitty stays inside the house and is very happy
doing so.

Signature
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck