Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I HATE DOGS!!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
---MIKE--- - 06 Sep 2005 23:16 GMT
On nice days I usually go for a four mile speed walk.  A neighbor of
mine has  rottweiler (sp) who is usually chained up.  Today, when I went
by, his owner had let him loose for a short time.  He came at me
aggressively and bit me on the arm.  Now, one doctor's visit and one
tetanus shot later I have a very sore arm.  The owner was VERY
apologetic and said that the dog will never go loose again.  I HATE
DOGS!!!

                 ---MIKE---
>>In the White Mountains of New Hampshire
>> (44° 15'  N - Elevation 1580')
LauraM - 06 Sep 2005 23:58 GMT
Don't hate dogs.  Hate the owners.
JQ - 07 Sep 2005 00:35 GMT
Definately it's the owners fault! Don't hate dogs, they are innocent
creatures. Treated badly by owners is the only cause for bad behaviour.
JQ
John Doe - 07 Sep 2005 00:37 GMT
> On nice days I usually go for a four mile speed walk.  A
> neighbor of mine has  rottweiler (sp) who is usually chained up.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> arm.  The owner was VERY apologetic and said that the dog will
> never go loose again.  I HATE DOGS!!!

Pepper spray.

http://www.copsplus.com/foxlabs.php
Alison - 07 Sep 2005 01:14 GMT
On nice days I usually go for a four mile speed walk.  A neighbor of
mine has  rottweiler (sp) who is usually chained up.  Today, when I
went
by, his owner had let him loose for a short time.  He came at me
aggressively and bit me on the arm.  Now, one doctor's visit and one
tetanus shot later I have a very sore arm.  The owner was VERY
apologetic and said that the dog will never go loose again.  I HATE
DOGS!!!>>>>>

That must have ben scary and painful too:(
It's the owner who is to blame, not the dog. I feel sorry for it
chained up all the time:(
 Alison
sriddles@aol.com - 07 Sep 2005 04:16 GMT
> On nice days I usually go for a four mile speed walk.  A neighbor of
> mine has  rottweiler (sp) who is usually chained up.  Today, when I went
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>                   ---MIKE

I have to chime in too and say "Hate the owner, not the dog."  I don't
care for rottweilers either; they're just so big and have such a bad
reputation though I'm sure most of them are docile.
Sorry about your arm; hope it heals well. Dog bites are really prone to
infection; take care of yourself. Did the dog have to go into
quarantine? Was it current on its shots?
I sure hope the neighbor did more than apologize; I hope he paid for
your tetanus shot. He should have.
Sherry
Diane - 07 Sep 2005 04:22 GMT
> I have to chime in too and say "Hate the owner, not the dog."  I don't
> care for rottweilers either; they're just so big and have such a bad
> reputation though I'm sure most of them are docile.

I have a soft spot for them; most of the ones I've known have been huge
rug dogs; one belonged to a sports store owner and basically held the
carpet down all day, even while being petted. I really don't think
they're mean by nature, although some dog breeds are more territorial
and protective than others.
Signature

Web site: http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/
Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

---MIKE--- - 07 Sep 2005 13:23 GMT
>>I sure hope the neighbor did more than
>> apologize; I hope he paid for your
>> tetanus shot. He should have.
>>Sherry

Actually, the owner insisted on my taking a hundred dollar bill (I tried
to refuse it without success).  All the medical expenses will be covered
by Medicare.  

Regarding "bad" owners - some dog breeds (Rotts and Pit Bulls) are noted
for being unpredictable regarding aggression. No matter how docile they
may seem, they are prone to sudden attacks.  I can see NO reason for
their existence.  A good friend has several greyhounds (retired from
racing) and they are great dogs.  They don't bark and are very gentle.
My arm is feeling better this morning and the bleeding has stopped.  The
dog IS up to date on his rabies shots.

                 ---MIKE---
>>In the White Mountains of New Hampshire
>> (44° 15'  N - Elevation 1580')
Janet B - 07 Sep 2005 13:49 GMT
>Regarding "bad" owners - some dog breeds (Rotts and Pit Bulls) are noted
>for being unpredictable regarding aggression. No matter how docile they
>may seem, they are prone to sudden attacks.  

Not even close.    Dogs always have a reason to bite, and any dog can
bite.  The chaining of dogs is conducive to building frustration and
agitation.  Runner (and speed walkers) are often the moving target of
such frustration.  It isn't the breed, it's the owner's lack of proper
containment and training.

> I can see NO reason for
>their existence.  

They're pretty nice dogs, as breeds (Rottis and Pitbulls).  

>A good friend has several greyhounds (retired from
>racing) and they are great dogs.

Some of them are.  Some don't get rescued for a reason.  They can bite
too, and are prone to aggression towards cats and other small animals
(not all of them obviously).  Generalizing is never a good thing.

> They don't bark and are very gentle.

SOME of them are very gentle.  Some (especially if they did well on
the track) can be quite formidable.

The GH's one sees on a daily basis have been carefully screened before
placement.    Also, as a condion of adoption, and common wisdom,
you're not going to see them off leash in an open area for the most
part.  Nor chained - they can slip a plain collar easily and tying on
a martingale wouldn't be wise.

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Diane - 07 Sep 2005 14:15 GMT
> > I can see NO reason for
> >their existence.  
>
> They're pretty nice dogs, as breeds (Rottis and Pitbulls).  

I had a Rottweiler come running at me full speed in the park. I'm not
afraid of dogs except ones that are chained and growling (or running and
growling/looking aggressive). This one didn't look aggressive and she
was bounding in a happy way, so I stood still. I was beginning to wonder
who she belonged to when an elderly woman comes huffing up and yelling,
"Don't be afraid -- she's very sweet!"  I petted her when she came up.
She was a sweet dog just dying to meet someone new. Oddly, the only pit
bull I've known also belonged to an elderly woman, who boarded him with
my veterinarian when she was on vacation. The dog was also ancient (16!)
and seemed mainly interested in sniffing the floor. He was in pretty
good shape, and the veterinarian said that he'd never been aggressive,
but they were careful with him coming in contact with anyone because of
how people react. I guess he figured I wouldn't freak out. :)
Signature

Web site: http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/
Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

Phil P. - 07 Sep 2005 15:03 GMT
>>I sure hope the neighbor did more than
>> apologize; I hope he paid for your
>> tetanus shot. He should have.
>>Sherry

Actually, the owner insisted on my taking a hundred dollar bill (I tried
to refuse it without success).  All the medical expenses will be covered
by Medicare.

I'd still sue the bastard because he tried to buy you off cheap.  If you
feel funny about accepting the money from the law suit- donate it to a
no-kill shelter.  You'll be helping a lot of cats.

Hope your arm is ok.

Phil
---MIKE--- - 07 Sep 2005 16:56 GMT
Phil wrote:
>>I'd still sue the bastard because he tried
>> to buy you off cheap. If you feel funny
>> about accepting the money from the
>> law suit- donate it to a no-kill shelter.
>> You'll be helping a lot of cats.

The problem is he is an old friend.  In 1974 I gave him his first ski
lesson (he was ten years old then).  He offered to pay my medical bills
too but Medicare will cover them.

                 ---MIKE---
>>In the White Mountains of New Hampshire
>> (44° 15'  N - Elevation 1580')
Janet B - 07 Sep 2005 17:33 GMT
>donate it to a
>no-kill shelter.  You'll be helping a lot of cats.

you mean a shelter that picks and choosed and let's someone else do
the dirty work?

Wouldn't it be nice if all neighbors could settle problems in a
friendly manner rather than yell SUE?  Geez.

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Phil P. - 07 Sep 2005 18:06 GMT
> >donate it to a
> >no-kill shelter.  You'll be helping a lot of cats.
>
> you mean a shelter that picks and choosed and let's someone else do
> the dirty work?

What an utterly stupid statement.  I suppose you prefer kill-shelters that
take in every animal and kills 90% of them.

No, Boss Janet. I mean a shelter that limits their admissions to only enough
animals that they can properly care for for the rest of their lives if
necessary - and doesn't hire people who believe in your methods of choking
and beating dogs into submission.  That's the type of shelter I was
referring to.
Janet B - 07 Sep 2005 20:35 GMT
>What an utterly stupid statement.  I suppose you prefer kill-shelters that
>take in every animal and kills 90% of them.

I prefer shelters who are honest in what they do.  Limiting admissions
is one way of sending people to have their animals killed elsewhere,
and you know that as well as I do.  "no kill of adoptable animals".
Isn't that a very interesting statement - so open to interpretation.  

>No, Boss Janet. I mean a shelter that limits their admissions to only enough
>animals that they can properly care for for the rest of their lives if
>necessary -

Keep them warehoused?  Is that life?

> and doesn't hire people who believe in your methods of choking
>and beating dogs into submission.  

Since I don't choke or beat dogs, I have no clue what you're talking
about, but then again, neither do you!

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Phil P. - 07 Sep 2005 21:15 GMT
> >What an utterly stupid statement.  I suppose you prefer kill-shelters that
> >take in every animal and kills 90% of them.
>
> I prefer shelters who are honest in what they do.

I see. So you don't think telling a person "we can't accept any more animals
because we've reached our capacity in space and resources" is honest?

Limiting admissions
> is one way of sending people to have their animals killed elsewhere,
> and you know that as well as I do.

No. Limiting admissions ensures that resources will be available to properly
care for all the animals in our care.

"no kill of adoptable animals".
> Isn't that a very interesting statement - so open to interpretation.

No kill of *all* animals that aren't suffering.  I guess your deranged mind
could interpret that a whole bunch of ways that would never occur to normal
people.

> >No, Boss Janet. I mean a shelter that limits their admissions to only enough
> >animals that they can properly care for the rest of their lives if
> >necessary -
>
> Keep them warehoused?  Is that life?

Don't know much about no-kill shelters, do you Boss Janet? (rhetorical
question).  Many shelter cats develop little communities and strong social
bonds and even life-long friendships and live very happy lives.  In fact,
several 'problem' cats have been returned because they were thought to have
behavioral problems when actually they missed their little communities; they
were happier with their friends in their little communities in the shelter
and displayed none of the behaviors for which they were returned.  I'd bet
that totally transcends your understanding!

> > and doesn't hire people who believe in your methods of choking
> >and beating dogs into submission.
>
> Since I don't choke or beat dogs, I have no clue what you're talking
> about, but then again, neither do you!

Oh, so you're not using spiked choke collars anymore and you don't get
"*physical*" with the dogs anymore?  Glad to hear it.

Btw, I though you said you kill-filed me.  Did you give me a reprieve?  If
so, please take it back.
John Doe - 07 Sep 2005 22:21 GMT
troll

> Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm03.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:17:53 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:391373

...
> I guess your deranged mind could interpret that a whole
> bunch of ways that would never occur to normal people.
UTBill - 07 Sep 2005 22:47 GMT
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:21:27 GMT,  wrote:

>troll

What is troll?

>> Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm03.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
>> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:17:53 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> I guess your deranged mind could interpret that a whole
>> bunch of ways that would never occur to normal people.
-

GIT-R-DONE!
Phil P. - 07 Sep 2005 23:10 GMT
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:21:27 GMT,  wrote:
>
> >troll
>
> What is troll?

John Doe! LOL!
UTBill - 08 Sep 2005 15:27 GMT
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:10:13 -0400,  wrote:

>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:21:27 GMT,  wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>John Doe! LOL!

Um OK, Can you explain more?
-

GIT-R-DONE!
John Doe - 08 Sep 2005 12:19 GMT
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:21:27 GMT,  wrote:

>>troll

> What is troll?

In my opinion. One definition of a troll is a writing/argument
that attacks the opponent instead of the opponent's argument.
Usually that is bait for a mudslinging contest. Or, a troll could
be the author himself if he frequently attempts to lure his
opponents into an mudslinging contest.

> Path: newssvr22.news.prodigy.net!newssvr31.news.prodigy.com!newssvr17.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm03.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!pd7cy2so!shaw.ca!news.alt.net!usenet
> From: UTBill <utb utb.com>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:391393
Katz - 08 Sep 2005 15:36 GMT
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:19:37 GMT,  wrote:

>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:21:27 GMT,  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>be the author himself if he frequently attempts to lure his
>opponents into an mudslinging contest.

What is mudslinging?
-

GIT-R-DONE!
Phil P. - 07 Sep 2005 23:11 GMT
> troll

There he goes!  The village idiot is at it again with his mindless "troll"
and headers posts! ROTFL!

He's OCD and an idiot-- What a combination! LOL!
Trish - 08 Sep 2005 01:43 GMT
> > troll
>
> There he goes!  The village idiot is at it again with his mindless "troll"
> and headers posts! ROTFL!
>
> He's OCD and an idiot-- What a combination! LOL!

hmmmmmmmmmmm could John Doe be Lyn?
Phil P. - 08 Sep 2005 03:09 GMT
> > > troll
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> hmmmmmmmmmmm could John Doe be Lyn?

Naa, John Doe's ego is too fragile to be a woman (or a man for that matter).
Wait! Maybe he's androgynous and is impotent and frigid at the same time.
Bummer- now I can't tell him to go f*ck himself.  He can't even get lucky
with himself.  LOL!
Trish - 08 Sep 2005 04:28 GMT
> > > > troll
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Bummer- now I can't tell him to go f*ck himself.  He can't even get lucky
> with himself.  LOL!

LOL I'm still trying to adjust the image this is leaving, its
entertaining and scary :)
Phil P. - 08 Sep 2005 15:28 GMT
> > > hmmmmmmmmmmm could John Doe be Lyn?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> LOL I'm still trying to adjust the image this is leaving, its
> entertaining and scary :)

I'm still trying to get the image out of my mind of John Doe stuffing his
cat in a plastic shopping bag and hanging if from a fish scale. Now, that
*is* scary.  Can you imagine the deranged mind that conjured up such a
heinous idea?
John Doe - 12 Sep 2005 07:39 GMT
...
> I'm still trying to get the image out of my mind of John Doe
> stuffing his cat in a plastic shopping bag

The same plastic grocery bags that my cats play with and crawl
into on their own, bags that they can easily shred.

> and hanging if from a fish scale. Now, that *is* scary.  Can you
> imagine the deranged mind that conjured up such a heinous idea?

Maybe remnants of your whore mother stuffing you into her douche
bag, attempting to hide you from her next rapist trick.

You are just a troll.

> Path: newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:31:29 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:391499

             
Phil P. - 12 Sep 2005 09:31 GMT
> ...
> > I'm still trying to get the image out of my mind of John Doe
> > stuffing his cat in a plastic shopping bag
>
> The same plastic grocery bags that my cats play with and crawl
> into on their own,

...and get their heads caught in the handles and choke to death.

>bags that they can easily shred.

...and swallow small pieces that could pleat up their intestines and cut
through the intestine wall.

You really *are* dip sh.t moron with the I.Q. of a hairball.  I gotta tell
you John, (btw, is that your name or description) you're the dumbest bastard
I've ever seen in any cat newsgroup- and I've seen some real dumbbells.

Intense pre-adoption screenings were implemented because of psychotic morons
like you.   Just goes to show you that degenerates like you can still slip
through the cracks.

In all seriousness, you're far too stupid to have cats.  I'm being honest
with you; I'm not insulting you.  Why don't you take your cats to your vet
and ask him to find them a home with someone a little smarter than you- say
someone with an I.Q. at least in double digits.  Your level of stupidity
actually presents a danger to your cats.  I know you can't distinguish right
from wrong, so do what you think is wrong and ask your vet to rehome your
cats before you cause their deaths.

> > and hanging if from a fish scale. Now, that *is* scary.  Can you
> > imagine the deranged mind that conjured up such a heinous idea?
>
> Maybe remnants of your whore mother stuffing you into her douche
> bag, attempting to hide you from her next rapist trick.

Oops- Now you've let everyone know that you're not only a moron, but that
you're psychotic, too.  Not that I really think anyone had any doubts.

> You are just a troll.

Nothing gets past your lightening-quick perception, does it Johnny boy?  Did
you figure that out all by yourself?  Gee, I hope you didn't hurt yourself.

Btw, speaking of mothers, do you call yours "mom" or "sis"? since their both
the same person.
John Doe - 12 Sep 2005 11:27 GMT
<snipped inconsequential troll judgments>

> You really *are* dip sh.t moron with the I.Q. of a hairball.  I gotta tell
> you John, (btw, is that your name or description) you're the dumbest bastard
> I've ever seen in any cat newsgroup- and I've seen some real dumbbells.

You certainly have seen a lot, fill.

Out of 4790 posts under your current ID:

126 LOL! (laughing at your own remarks)
75 stupid
75 idiot
72 ignorant
60 fool
59 paranoid (that's interesting IMO)
55 moron
48 ROTFLMAO! (laughing at your own remarks)
47 troll
45 neurotic
42 ROTFL! (laughing at your own remarks)
31 delusional
30 psychotic
20 psychopath

"...you're an unstable delusional psycho! LOL!"

lol

> Path: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm03.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:33:58 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:392290

             
Katz - 08 Sep 2005 15:29 GMT
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 22:09:37 -0400,  wrote:

>> > > troll
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Bummer- now I can't tell him to go f*ck himself.  He can't even get lucky
>with himself.  LOL!

Why are you all so mean here? I thought this was about cats?
-

GIT-R-DONE!
John Doe - 12 Sep 2005 07:29 GMT
...
> Naa, John Doe's ego is too fragile to be a woman (or a man for
> that matter). Wait! Maybe he's androgynous and is impotent and
> frigid at the same time.

And maybe your father is some Joe who raped your whore mother.

Maybe that's the reason for your lack of tact and manners,
nobody cared enough to teach you manners.

> Bummer- now I can't tell him to go f*ck himself.  He can't even
> get lucky with himself.  LOL!
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:391448

             
Phil P. - 12 Sep 2005 09:27 GMT
> ...
> > Naa, John Doe's ego is too fragile to be a woman (or a man for
> > that matter). Wait! Maybe he's androgynous and is impotent and
> > frigid at the same time.
>
> And maybe your father is some Joe who raped your whore mother.

There ya go!  You've just proved everything I've said about you is true.
You *are* a moron.  Now we can add psychopath to your list of accolades.

> Maybe that's the reason for your lack of tact and manners,
> nobody cared enough to teach you manners.

I only treat you like a dipshit moron because you *are* a dipshit moron with
the I.Q. of a hairball.  I gotta tell you John, (btw, is that your name or
description) you're the dumbest bastard I've ever seen in any cat newsgroup-
and I've seen some real dumbbells.

So, tell us John, what does it feel like to hold the title of dumbest
bastard in the group?
John Doe - 12 Sep 2005 11:32 GMT
<snipped inconsequential troll judgments>

> I only treat you like a dipshit moron because you *are* a
> dipshit moron with the I.Q. of a hairball.  I gotta tell you
> John, (btw, is that your name or description) you're the dumbest
> bastard I've ever seen in any cat newsgroup- and I've seen some
> real dumbbells.

You certainly have.

Out of 4790 posts under your current ID:

126 LOL! (laughing at your own remarks)
75 stupid
75 idiot
72 ignorant
60 fool
59 paranoid (that's interesting IMO)
55 moron
48 ROTFLMAO! (laughing at your own remarks)
47 troll
45 neurotic
42 ROTFL! (laughing at your own remarks)
31 delusional
30 psychotic
20 psychopath

"...you're an unstable delusional psycho! LOL!"

Apparently playing on the idea "it takes one to know one".

> Path: newssvr22.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:30:34 -0500
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:392289

             
John Doe - 08 Sep 2005 12:22 GMT
troll

> Path: newssvr22.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!207.35.177.252!nf3.bellglobal.com!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "Trish" <trish738 yahoo.com>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> hmmmmmmmmmmm could John Doe be Lyn?

             
Katz - 08 Sep 2005 15:34 GMT
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:22:54 GMT,  wrote:

This looks like fun.

> 69.153.64.213
SBC Internet Services - Southwest SBCIS-SBIS-6BLK (NET-69-148-0-0-1)
                                 69.148.0.0 - 69.155.255.255
PPPoX Pool - rback9.snantx SBCIS-071205130838 (NET-69-153-64-0-1)
                                 69.153.64.0 - 69.153.65.255

IP address: 69.153.64.213
Host name: adsl-69-153-64-213.dsl.snantx.swbell.net

TraceRoute to 69.153.64.213 [adsl-69-153-64-213.dsl.snantx.swbell.net]

Hop (ms) (ms) (ms)  IP Address Host name
1 0 0 0  66.98.244.1 gphou-66-98-244-1.ev1.net
2 1 1 0  66.98.241.7 gphou-66-98-241-7.ev1.net
3 0 0 0  66.98.240.8 gphou-66-98-240-8.ev1.net
4 2 1 1  216.200.251.169 ge-6-0-1.mpr1.iah1.us.above.net
5 6 6 6  64.125.29.22 so-4-0-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net
6 5 6 6  64.125.28.210 so-0-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net
7 5 6 6  151.164.249.137 ex2-p5-1.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net
8 20 124 40  151.164.242.41 ex1-p14-0.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net
9 7 36 7  151.164.40.34 bb2-p2-0.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net
10 7 7 7  151.164.191.121 bb1-p6-0.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net
11 15 15 15  151.164.191.110 bb1-p3-1.snantx.sbcglobal.net
12 15 15 15  151.164.17.248 dist1-vlan40.snantx.sbcglobal.net
13 15 15 16  151.164.17.140 rback9-g1-0.snantx.sbcglobal.net
-

GIT-R-DONE!
Charlie Wilkes - 08 Sep 2005 02:32 GMT
>>What an utterly stupid statement.  I suppose you prefer kill-shelters that
>>take in every animal and kills 90% of them.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>Since I don't choke or beat dogs, I have no clue what you're talking
>about, but then again, neither do you!

No, I think that's a bit hyperbolic.  But you have advocated various
forms of confrontation and intimidation to address behavioral
problems.  I remember this as one of the most exhausting discussions
of my Usenet career.  First I had to dispense with your denial by
googling proof of your bad advice.  Then I had to quote repeatedly
from Jean Donaldson while your Sarah Spinach, your sidekick, doggedly
insisted Donaldson's text -- written at about the same level as the
instructions on a fire extinguisher -- meant something other than what
it quite obviously said.

It all started with K.W. "Psycho" Brown and her travails.  Remember?

Charlie
TheAmazingPussyWizard@HushMail.Com - 08 Sep 2005 03:53 GMT
HOWEDY janet,

> > What an utterly stupid statement.

That's the price of admission, Phil.

> > I suppose you prefer kill-shelters that
> > take in every animal and kills 90% of them.

janet works with the kill shelter that murders
90% of their sheletered critters of which 10%
of janet's dog training STUDENTS like Nessa's
dogs are CUSTOMERS for their DEATH DEALING RESCUE..

> I prefer shelters who are honest in what they do.

Yeah. That's why you got mad at paulette "TOO MANY
NO KILL SHELTERS" nolan's offer to accept your
STUDENT Nessa's dogs when they turned on her thanks
to you and your partner sinofabitch jerking choking
shocking bribing and tying them to the bed and locking
them in the crapper and destroying her house and gettin
her evicted for barking complaints.

REMEMBER janet?

>   Limiting admissions is one way of sending people
>   to have their animals killed elsewhere,

You mean, like your own SHELTER, janet. You DO
rmember paulette was gonna "accept" your STUDENT
Nessa's owner aggressive dogs and murder them on
the sly so Nessa WOULDN'T GO INSANE *(round trip)
from MURDERING her dogs she TRUSTED YOU TO TRAIN,
the dogs you taught her to HURT and INTIMIDATE.

REMEMBER NOW, janet?

> and you know that as well as I do.

No janet. Dogs GET MURDERED in SHELTERS by
DOG MURDERERS like mikey ball and you. paulette
runs a NO KILL shelter. She tells folks she don't
MURDER the dogs she MURDERS like she was fixin to
do for YOUR STUDENT NESSA.

> "no kill of adoptable animals".

Yeah, he means critters that ain't in intractable
pain or needing extensive dramatic surgury.

> Isn't that a very interesting statement -

That NO KILL should mean NO KILLIN of animals
that can LIVE without being in intractable
pain or needing extensive expensive dramatic
often futile surgeries, janet? That's quite
a change up from what your shelters offer.

> so open to interpretation.

You mean NOT MURDERING INNOCENT reasonably HEELTHY
ADOPTABLE CRITTERS?

> > No, Boss Janet. I mean a shelter that limits
> > their admissions to only enough animals that
> > they can properly care for for the rest of
> > their lives if necessary -

That'd require some THINKING CARING PERSONS.

> Keep them warehoused?

You mean KENNELED, janet? Kinda like a racing
Grey Hound or zoo critter or ETHICKAL BREEDER'S
BROOD STOCK, janet?

> Is that life?

Whatever, it beats the crap outta GETTIN MURDERED by
a RESCUER like yourself and paula "kind2dogs" nolan.

> > and doesn't hire people who believe in your methods
> > of choking and beating dogs into submission.
>
> Since I don't choke or beat dogs,

Not since you got your SHOCK collar, janet?:

"> So, I prefer the better fitting nylon slip collars,

That so? You mean when you ain't jerkin and
choking the dog on your pronged spiked pinch
choke collar, janet...

>  and very often, pinch collars (small link
>  unless it'sa freaky dog,

You mean those FREAKY dogs that STRUGGLE when choked, janet?

>  then they need the milder medium link).

RIGHT... so they don't BREAK their thin slip chokers...

> But I use e-collars too. With one of my dogs
> and with some clients.

You mean, the dogs you CAN'T HURT ENOUGH with
your pronged spiked pinch and slip choke collars,
janet <{); ~ ) >

> For circumstances where a physical collar and
> leash is not the right answer."

Like when you know the dog will turn on you
for jerking and choking IT, like nessa's dogs.

> I have no clue what you're talking about,

Phil was talkin about THIS:

> He was next to me and I could see his neck
> muscles pulsing. He didn't even blink an eye.
> Janet Boss

> > > I can't imagine needing anything higher
> > > than a 5 with it, even with an insensitive
> > > dog like a Lab.

An INSENSITIVE DOG???

> > I can't remember what model of Innotek I have, but
> > I had apointer ignore a neck-muscle-pulsing 9.

>  but then again, neither do you!

We was talkin about THIS:

>  how effective are these electronic fences in
>  keeping a dog on a property????

Some run through it. Others get shocked and become
too scared to go out in the yard anymore.
Just heard of a guy that has to rehome his dog,
because the dog got caught right in the path of
the shock and will now not go near his person,
won't go outside.

Just hides under a desk in the house.

Here's your PARTNER who heelped nessa train her dogs:

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

sinofabitch writes:
> >> What I have said- repeatedly - is that he took
> >> posts from two different people,

Of curse THAT'S a lie.

> >> took pieces of them out of context,

Of curse. QUOTED. You wanna see it in context?

> >> cobbled them together,

No. There was WON DIRECT QUOTE.

> >> then added his own words:

"Neatly," and "Smartly."

> >> and a fake signature.

"sinofabitch" instead of sionnach.

> >> Which is exactly what he did.

INDEEDY. That's HOWE COME you deny it.

> >> The actual quote is misleading

That so?

> >> when taken out of context,

We'd been talkin abHOWET beatin the dog with a shoe...

> >> and Jerry's faked "quote"

The WON sinofabitch totally DENIES.

> >> is downright meaningless.

Only if you're a MENTAL CASE.

> > Here's Jerry's version
> > "I Dropped The Leash, Threw My
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > nipped her ear.
> > --Sara Sionnach

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

See?

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

From: "sionnach" <rhyfe...@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:43:01 -0500
Subject: Re: E-Collars - with Vibrator?

> > I can't imagine needing anything higher than a
> > 5 with it, even with an insensitive dog like a Lab.
>
> I can't remember what model of Innotek I have, but
> I had a pointer ignore a neck-muscle-pulsing 9.

 Hm. Just out of curiosity, under what circumstances,
and at what distance?

  Personally, I'd be inclined to suspect collar failure
if that happened, especially if the dog was at a distance
and/or if there were trees or some other terrain which
could affect range.

From: sionnach (rhyfe...@email.msn.com)
Subject: Re: Correct use of prong collar
Date: 2001-05-05 13:03:14 PST

> And Sally responded:
> >Who said that? I would never do or recommend
> >that, and neither would most of the regulars on here.
> >Sally Hennessey

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

> I've posted my entire quote, since Patch failed to do so.
> Take it out of context and you'd think I was flinging puppies
> across the room!

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

> here's what I said (keep in mind that we're talking about a
> 12 week old ~25# FCR puppy):
> A small scruff shake is appropriate if he's
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^­^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> very persistant.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Um, may I suggest a re-wording that might make
it clearer- given that "scruff shake" is too easily
misinterpreted as "pick the puppy up by the scruff
of the neck and shake the puppy in the air"?

I think I'd phrase it something like "if the puppy is very
persistant, it can be appropriate to take hold of the
loose skin at the back of the neck and give a slight
shake to the *skin*".

Janet's not talking about actually shaking
the puppy, which I think we ALL agree is
abusive."

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

That's INSANE. Ain't it. So's this, here's professor
of ANAL-ytic behaviorISM research at UofWI marshall
"SCRUFF SHAKE and SCREAM "NO!" into ITS face for five
seconds and lock IT in a box for ten minutes contemplation"
dermer:

"At this point, "No" does not have any behavioral function.
But, if you say "No,"pick up the puppy by its neck and
shake it a bit, and the frequency of the biting decreases
then you will have achieved too things.

First, the frequency of unwanted chewing has decreased;
and two, you have established "No" as a conditioned punisher.

How much neck pulling and shaking? Just the
minimum necessary to decrease the unwanted
biting.

**********IS THAT A CONSISTENT 5 SECONDS?************

When our dog was a puppy, "No" came before mild
forms of punishment (I would hold my dog's mouth
closed for a few seconds.) whereas "Bad Dog" came
before stronger punishement (the kind discussed above).

"No" is usually sufficient but sometimes I use "Bad Dog"
to stop a behavior. "Bad Dog" ALWAYS works," marshall
dermer, research professor of ANAL-ytic behaviorISM at
UofWI. For MOORE animal abuse, please visit dr p.

BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!!!

That's INSANE. Ain't it.

"The actual quote is misleading when taken out of context"

You're a liar and dog abusing mental case.

> --
> Janet B
> www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Here's The Puppy Wizard's SYNDROME:

From: "Jennifer" <msjh...@gmail.com>
Date: 13 May 2005 07:25:15 -0700
Subject: Re: diagnosis frustration

> Even when the answers are bad, I like ANSWERS.  Where
> my little Carey-kitty is involved, we never seem to have
> any.  She's been "sick" for the last 3 years and we've
> never been able to figure out just what's going on with her.

>  I'm trying to not add up the costs, as they just keep mounting.

I completely agree.  Undiagnosable, untreatable problems are
incredibly frustrating. Thanks for hanging in there.

Your comrade in not-knowing-what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-her-cat,
Jennifer

From: Janet B <j...@bestfriendsdogobedience.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:30:03 -0400
Subject: diagnosis frustration

Even when the answers are bad, I like ANSWERS.  Where my little
Carey-kitty is involved, we never seem to have any.  She's been "sick"
for the last 3 years and we've never been able to figure out just
what's going on with her.  I'm trying to not add up the costs, as they
just keep mounting.

Carey is an almost 12 year old tortie with numerous problems over the
3 years, related to behavior, urinary issues, weight loss, and early
on, paralysis as well.  We've had tests out the wazoo, have seen
standard general practice vets as well as a neurologist, tried various
medications, and we still have no real answers.

I'm hoping those come soon, but the preliminary aren't great choices.

After raising her Elavil level to combat inappropriate urination, she
tore her ACL.  That appears to be healing slowly.  She's been at the
vet numerous times in the last few weeks and we started seeing a
different vet, closer to home this week.

That was after she projectile vomited 2 meals, and was passing bloody
urine, on Monday.  After a few small puddles of that, her urine was
not bloody and she was back to eating without problem.  All day
Tuesday was fine.  Saw vet on Wednesday, and x-rayed her bladder, and
embarked on more tests (last full bloodwork was last August).  She has
a HUGE palpable thyroid gland, yet her thyroid tests (free T-4 still
waiting) have all been normal.  She weighs 7# and is skin and bones,
and has been for quite a long time.  She eats well (1 full can of
Trader Joe's cat food and 1/2 can Fancy Feast daily) and plays with
the other cat, loves on the dogs, etc.

5 minutes after coming home from the vet on Wednesday, she squatted on
the floor and let loose a large puddle of bloody urine.  No blood in
urine since.  Her urinalysis shows no issues.

Her kidneys look fine on x-rays, but her test results show renal
insufficiency, but not failure.

We're still waiting for more test results, but so far, we have no
answers.  Does anyone have any thoughts?

--

From: Janet B <j...@bestfriendsdogobedience.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:16:20 -0400
Subject: Re: diagnosis frustration

On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:57:31 -0500, kaeli

<tiny_...@NOSPAM.comcast.net> wrote:

> I'm sorry to hear Carey has been so sick.
> My first thought was not a good one -- cancer.

Thanks.  Unfortunately, that's what my vet has said as well.
Having dealt with it with a few pets now, it didn't hit me
quite like the ton of bricks as the first time I heard that
diagnosis, but it still is hard to hear that it's a potential.

The last 2 days, she's been galloping and eating and acting
like "hey - I'm ok - no problem - don't worry about me!".

She's a tough little cat, but obviously not a well one.

She's adored by all beings in this household, so we'll do
whatever we need to for her as we find out (or not) more.
Right now she's curled up with her kitty-"brother" and
seems happy as she can be.

--
Janet B

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: j1b...@aol.com (J1Boss)
Date: 24 Feb 2004 16:08:06 GMT
Subject: Re: Russian Blue running away - help!

> From: "Gail" g...@earthlink.net
> I wonder if a scat mat will help. It is a mat that is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> one of my cats started urinating there. They were great.
> Gail

A scat mat directly in front of the door, can be stepped
OVER by the humans, but teach the cat to avoid the door area.

I think it's a great solution.

BTW they can run on a 9V battery, so no wires are needed.

They are fixtures on my leather furniture to stop kitties
from peeing there!

Janet Boss
Best Friends Dog Obedience
"Nice Manners for the Family Pet"
Voted "Best of Baltimore 2001" - Baltimore Magazine

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: Janet B <j...@bestfriendsdogobedience.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:18:15 -0400

Subject: Re: Electric shock pad

On 8 Aug 2005 11:03:01 -0700, "mystro"
<highpur...@gmail.com>, clicked
their heels and said:

>I'm trying to find a link or resource for purchasing training shock
>pad,a pad that gives a slight shock using flashlight batteries and
>perfectly harmless and from what little I've read..quite effective.
>Help  :)

it's called a Scat Mat.  Google that and you'll find several sources.

--
Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.co m
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/ bestfriendsobedience/album

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: j1b...@aol.com (J1Boss)
Date: 03 Nov 2003 19:25:20 GMT

Subject: Re: Keeping cat out of room.

>From: "Iso" nos...@hotmail.com
>The mats, regardless of what you think WORK and are HARMLESS.

Just another opinion that Scat Mats are pretty useful tools.

Rather than have my youngest cat continue to ruin my
leather furniture, we have Scat Mats on the sofa and
chair.

When they are off, and we're sitting on that furniture,
Skip is allowed on and in our laps, etc.  When the mats
are on, I can be happy with the fact that he's not
urinating on the leather!

The static charge isn't much at all - it's a deterrent,
and a good one.

Janet Boss
Best Friends Dog Obedience
"Nice Manners for the Family Pet"
Voted "Best of Baltimore 2001" - Baltimore Magazine

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: j1b...@aol.com (J1Boss)
Date: 04 Nov 2003 21:35:43 GMT

Subject: Re: Declawing: glad I took the time

Kaeli wrote:

> Some of us feel that declawing a cat is tantamount
> to torture. You don't torture something you profess
> to love. Period. You don't even take the chance that
> it might be tortured. Period.

I fully understand that (and the analogy of other groups
who feel strongly about issue "x").  I think there is a
very, very large group of people who choose or think about
declawing, do so not because they want to take a chance
that the animal they love may be tortured, but because
of a variety of experiences/advice that says it's an ok
thing to do (not torture in general - declawing!).

Take the neighbor's attitude ("just" a cat?  NO cat is
"just" anything! ;-D). One shared by many, to some degree.
Lot's of priorities.  Interesting thread on RPDB recently
about people willing to die/put themselves in the line of
fire for their dogs.

It was interesting to read the range of thoughts on such
a thing.  Obviously, people give different weight to
different beings and things.

While I am their caregiver and friend, I don't put
pets in the same category as humans.

I declawed my first cat, because my experiences said that
is what you did with an indoor cat (had lived with many
cats owned by others).  She used her claws inappropriately
as a kitten, and my meager attempts at clawing devices
didn't work, so I thought nothing of it.

Since she exhibited no obvious ill effects, my experience
(and hers as far as anyone could tell) was a positive one.

Knowing more of what it entailed, I chose not to declaw my
next cat (owned in tandem with cat #1 and then cat #3).
He was an adult acquisition and I knew such a thing would
be more difficult for him, but also, he was very trainable
and I didn't even consider it.

Cat #3 was a claw maniac, and due to my experiences with
Cat #1, I went ahead with a declaw.  Once again, I have
never seen any backlashes due to the operation, and I
would put up with anything if I'm lucky enough to have
her for many more years, which isn't all that likely.

She's doing well on meds currently, and maintaining,
if not gaining any weight.

Once I was ready for cat #4, I knew that I wouldn't choose
this route again. Not because of gory pictures, not because
of scare tactics about what my declawed cat would become,
but because I realized that more tools could make the
difference and it wasn't something that I really wanted
to do.

I didn't want to cause a kitten pain (even though others
didn't seem to experience any!), nor any physical or
emotional problems.  So, I have a fully clawed cat who
pees on things - oh well! ;-D  He's a wonderful cat in
every other way!

> If you love your furniture more than your cat's right
> to not be mutilated, you are going to draw some venom
> in a cat newsgroup.

Again, why is it either/or?

Can't someone value their belongings and their cat too?

I choose to protect my furniture with Sticky Paws (I forgot
they were there - probably time to take them off - it's been
almost 2 years with no interest!) and with Scat Mats (not
from claws but from urine).

Some folks posting here think that's a horrible thing to do.

People who have obviously never felt a Scat Mat!  But balloons,
snappy trainers, etc are recommended.  A lot of contradictory
thoughts here, so I can't say that it's all rational.

Passion rarely is though - and I actually appreciate
that for the most part!

It's obvious that each one of us has our own limits.

Janet Boss
Best Friends Dog Obedience
"Nice Manners for the Family Pet"
Voted "Best of Baltimore 2001" - Baltimore Magazine

gn.net/kae lisSpace

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: j1b...@aol.com (J1Boss)
Date: 23 Jan 2004 21:21:29 GMT
Subject: Re: Protecting leather furniture

> But would a scat mat keep a cat from clawing
> the side of the couch?
>--
>~kaeli~

no - it's only good for the pee problem!

Never showed any interest in clawing, and
"launch" marks disappeared easily, as good
leather "heals" itself.

Janet Boss
Best Friends Dog Obedience
"Nice Manners for the Family Pet"
Voted "Best of Baltimore 2001" - Baltimore Magazine

Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
From: j1b...@aol.com (J1Boss)
Date: 04 Jun 2003 12:10:19 GMT

Subject: a few frustrations - a little long.
Mostly venting, but any thoughts are welcome!

#1 - Skipjack.  1.5 y.o. neutered male blue tabby.

Incredibly sweet and affectionate, sleeps against me
all night, on my lap every moment he can be. Eats well
(Solid Gold dry, various brands of canned - small amounts -
not much interest), uses his litter box, only scratches
his tree and a few mats that have been approved, and is
a very nice cat.  Let's anyone carry him around forever
and is very social.  Gets along well with 2 dogs and
another cat. But................

He also urinates on other things.  Sofas (where we sit) -
frequency of maybe every few months.  Wires.  Phone or
speaker wires (thin), that are at floor level.  Scrapes
around at them and urinates on them on hard surface flooring.

Maybe once every few weeks.  Dog beds and dog's sofa
(I have baby mattress pads on these, under the covers
in order to just have to do wash!) - once every few
weeks. Guest bed - used or freshly washed sheets.
Full laundry basket - random, if available, not often.

Anything that can go in the wash has gotten soaked and
washed in hot water, Oxyclean added.  Anything not machine
washable gets a thorough cleaning with Simple Solution Cat
Urine Cleaner (which I found seems to work better than Nature's
Miracle for this).

Feliway has been used to varying success.

Most recently, he urinated on a sofa cushion within a
few hours of spraying it with Feliway.

I have 2 cats, 2 litterboxes.  One crystals, which he prefers,
one scoopable, which my other cat prefers.  Both are kept
incredibly clean.  No problem using the box, even when workmen
were in the room - I see him use it regularly and tell him what
a good kitty he is for doing so.

A little history - when he came home at 5 months old last
February (2002), he had a bad case of the squirts and managed
to fly around with liquid poop being released all over my sofas.

We cleared that up, washed everything thoroughly (sofas have
2 sets of machine washable slipcovers, and the leather sofa
he christened has a scat mat on it now), and thought we had
conquered any problems.

He is quite the perfect cat except for this issue and it's
very random as to where and when he decides to urinate.

I'm not happy with the situation of course, and can't quite
figure out what's going on.  He doesn't have a UTI and has
normal elimination patterns as far as frequency.

He does not do this in my bedroom, the other guest bedroom,
the kitchen or dining room.

If you've read this far, I have another cat and problem! ;-D

#2 Carey. Almost 10 y.o. spayed tortie.  Neurological problems
(probabl brain tumor, other things ruled out).  Has been on Pred
and Valium for a bit over a year,  and has dropped from a bit over
9# to less than 7# (all thyroid tests came back normal).

She's a happy and sweet cat who bugs me for her pills every
morning.  She has a problem with raised (even happy) voices
where she attacks the dogs.  I've talked about that here before.

The dogs are saints and have never reacted adversely to her
doing this.  I can pick her up during these episodes and she
doesn't attack me, but is hell bent on trying to attack the
dogs.  There have been times where the dogs noises have
triggered this.  She gets along well with the younger cat.

She adores the dogs otherwise, and that's really the problem
more than the attacking (we've all kind of learned to live
with that!).

She obsesses over them.

When she was a kitten, she nursed on my Golden Retriever
so much that she needed surgery for hair blockage.  She
ceased the behavior until she was 5.5 and when another
dog died, then she resumed.

She transferred that to another dog after the Golden died
1.5 years later, and now it's just increased to a difficult
level.

She does this to both of my dogs, mostly at nighttime or
whenever they are napping in my bedroom.  She will do it
to the one dog in other locations as well.  During the day,
it's not so bad.

The dogs look confused but tolerate it, even though she's
latched onto them with her mouth and rear claws.  She
attaches herself to various parts of their bodies.

Nighttime is the problem - we're not getting any sleep!

Skipjack sleeps on the bed, the dogs sleep on their dog
beds or her favorite dog sleeps under the bed.

She will not leave her alone!

Poor Lucy gets up and leaves the room, only for Carey
to follow her, and she winds up pacing around, which
keeps us awake.  She just isn't deterred.  She can be
lifted off, tossed off, grumbled at, but she will not
leave the dogs alone until she's good and ready.

The only rooms that can be closed off are either across
the hall or under our room.  She's a very vocal cat and
will meow like crazy if confined away from everyone else,
so that won't help sleep.

Any thoughts of novel things to try with either of these
kitties?  I adore them but their habits are driving me
up the wall at times!

Janet Boss
Best Friends Dog Obedience
"Nice Manners for the Family Pet"
Voted "Best of Baltimore 2001" - Baltimore Magazine

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.