Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Orleans, cat not allowed in shelter for homeless

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joske - 29 Aug 2005 08:58 GMT
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-katrina29aug29,0,384327.sto
ry?coll=la-home-nation


Second image in the Photo Gallery, the text reads:

"Joseph Barnes, who is homeless, stands in the nearly deserted
French Quarter with his cat Patches. Barnes said he was not allowed
to enter the Superdome shelter with his cat, because pets were not
permitted in the shelter. He said he was unsure where he would spend
the night."

I can only hope the photographer was able and willing to arrange
something for them.

Joske
idontmind@gmail.com - 29 Aug 2005 10:06 GMT
> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-katrina29aug29,0,384327.sto
ry?coll=la-home-nation

>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Joske

More non-new for news' sake.  We are blowing the arms and legs off of
little Iraqis and this is all the LA Times can come up with.

-L.
(shaking head)
Joske - 30 Aug 2005 07:32 GMT
In news:1125306409.363465.5880@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
idontmind@gmail.com

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-katrina29aug29,0,384327.sto
ry?coll=la-home-nation


>> Second image in the Photo Gallery, the text reads:

>> "Joseph Barnes, who is homeless, stands in the nearly deserted
>> French Quarter with his cat Patches. Barnes said he was not
>> allowed to enter the Superdome shelter with his cat, because
>> pets were not permitted in the shelter. He said he was unsure
>> where he would spend the night."

>> I can only hope the photographer was able and willing to arrange
>> something for them.

> More non-new for news' sake.  We are blowing the arms and legs
> off of little Iraqis and this is all the LA Times can come up
with.
> -L.
> (shaking head)

Sure. It's only a cat, and just a message about a cat posted in a
cat group. What was I thinking of...

...not of a vitriolic personality like yours, that's for sure.

Joske
Barb from before - 30 Aug 2005 15:14 GMT
The news showed the smart people evacuating the day before holding their
dogs and I assume their cats were in travel bags.  Those are my kind of
people.

--
Barb
Of course I don't look busy,
I did it right the first time.
Brian Beuchaw - 30 Aug 2005 19:58 GMT
> The news showed the smart people evacuating the day before holding their
> dogs and I assume their cats were in travel bags.  Those are my kind of
> people.

What about all the people that own pets that could *not* evacuate for
whatever reason (too poor to own a car, too infirm, etc.)?  They might be
smart too, but circumstances might make it impossible for a person
(whether they own pets or not) to evacuate.

brian
Signature

If you want to reply to this message by mail, you will
have to change the reply address to beuchaw@beuchaw.net

Joske - 30 Aug 2005 21:20 GMT
>> The news showed the smart people evacuating the day before
>> holding their dogs and I assume their cats were in travel bags.
>> Those are my kind of people.

> What about all the people that own pets that could *not* evacuate
> for whatever reason (too poor to own a car, too infirm, etc.)?
> They might be smart too, but circumstances might make it
> impossible for a person (whether they own pets or not) to
> evacuate.

Indeed. The photo I posted the link to (it's gone now) was of a
homeless person holding his cat Patches on a leash. He had no means
of leaving town and didn't want to abandon his cat. He wasn't
allowed into a shelter because of the cat. He was standing there
with his cat all alone in an deserted street.

Today we saw images of a father and his children missing their
wife/mum - she had fallen off the roof they were sitting on when it
split in two. I suppose dad will be blamed too for not providing a
better income so that they could have evacuated by car, expensive
airplane tickets, or whatever.

But somehow I am not surprised at the lack of compassion in this
group. The huge fight over Conan has shown it to be a group with a
large amount of insecure unhappy egos afraid to lose one flake off
their skin - of course being confronted with someone even less
fortunate than themselves would give cause to razorsharp judgment.

Joske
Diane - 31 Aug 2005 01:35 GMT
> > The news showed the smart people evacuating the day before holding their
> > dogs and I assume their cats were in travel bags.  Those are my kind of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> smart too, but circumstances might make it impossible for a person
> (whether they own pets or not) to evacuate.

Most of the people at the Superdome were in that category -- elderly,
poor, kids, etc.
Signature

Web site: http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/
Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

MaryL - 01 Sep 2005 05:26 GMT
>> > The news showed the smart people evacuating the day before holding
>> > their
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Most of the people at the Superdome were in that category -- elderly,
> poor, kids, etc.

Yes, this is a tragedy of immense proportions.  Many of the people who did
not leave literally *could not* because they had no means of transportation.
Once again, many of the poor were hit the hardest.  I donated through the
American Red Cross Relief Fund, but no amount of donations will be able to
recover what has been lost (in both lives -- 2-legged, 4-legged, and
others -- and property).

MaryL
Marilyn - 01 Sep 2005 05:35 GMT
>  I donated through the
> American Red Cross Relief Fund, but no amount of donations will be able to
> recover what has been lost (in both lives -- 2-legged, 4-legged, and
> others -- and property).

The worst is yet to come. Many alive now will die as they wait for help due
to the wipeout of the infrastructure that rescue groups need as a base of
operations. (Places to sleep, safe water, clear roads.) More will die of
disease. Some will kill themselves as they watch their dead
loved ones rot and realize what they themselves are in for over the next
few months.  This is not the usual hurricane situation. This is not like
anything we have ever seen before.

Hospitals in N. O. are full of  patients who have been lying  in their own
filth for days, and health
workers are risking their own health due to no running water, no clean
linens, no food, and what it means to care for the very ill with no chance
of sanitary conditions.

Worst of all is the fact that most suffering are very poor
and not white. They are rightfully distrustful from experiencing a lifetime
of brutal racism. I guess we will see
what happens.
MaryL - 01 Sep 2005 05:42 GMT
>>  I donated through the
>> American Red Cross Relief Fund, but no amount of donations will be able
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> of brutal racism. I guess we will see
> what happens.

It is a dreadful situation, as you have so graphically and poignantly
illustrated.  It is a tragedy that is beyond words and, really, beyond
comprehension.  I truly cannot imagine the agony that those people must be
feeling and the pain they must endure.  It is such a helpless feeling.

MaryL
Marilyn - 01 Sep 2005 05:53 GMT
> It is a dreadful situation, as you have so graphically and poignantly
> illustrated.  It is a tragedy that is beyond words and, really, beyond
> comprehension.  I truly cannot imagine the agony that those people must be
> feeling and the pain they must endure.  It is such a helpless feeling.

It is. I have been in tears on and off all day, and while not usually one
to watch the endless CNN accounts of every natural disaster, I did
watch the news accounts from dinner time (the few bites I managed
stuck in my throat and congealed) until about 10. It is a level of misery
we have rarely if ever seen. Everybody deals with it in their own way, I am
sending money and praying. Think about the little babies and the pregnant
women and the old people. My God.
idontmind@gmail.com - 01 Sep 2005 06:29 GMT
> It is. I have been in tears on and off all day

Oh really?  You have a heart?  I think that's news to anyone here.

>, and while not usually one
> to watch the endless CNN accounts of every natural disaster, I did
> watch the news accounts from dinner time (the few bites I managed
> stuck in my throat and congealed) until about 10. It is a level of misery
> we have rarely if ever seen. Everybody deals with it in their own way, I am
> sending money and praying.

Oh, so the c.nt Extrordinaire has religion, eh?  Talk about hypocrite.
You better pray to your God.  You're gonna need him.

>Think about the little babies

Yeah, think about the little babies.  Especially the one who's name you
drag through the mud for your own kicks.  Talk about hypocrite, indeed!

>and the pregnant
> women and the old people. My God.

My God is right.

-L.
Bet You Missed Me! - 01 Sep 2005 06:38 GMT
> Oh, so the c.nt Extrordinaire has religion, eh?  Talk about hypocrite.
> You better pray to your God.  You're gonna need him.

Now this sounds like a threat to me, Lynette.

Watching you melt down is so entertaining. :)
idontmind@gmail.com - 31 Aug 2005 17:14 GMT
> What about all the people that own pets that could *not* evacuate for
> whatever reason (too poor to own a car, too infirm, etc.)?

People who cannot care for their animals properly should not have them.
Caring for your animals properly includes being able to transport them
wherever they need to go.  Of course many people in these circumstances
*do* have pets, and unfortunately it is the pets who pay the price.

> They might be
> smart too, but circumstances might make it impossible for a person
> (whether they own pets or not) to evacuate.

I feel sorry for the poor people who didn't have transportaion and/or
no means to get away.  Those are the people who deserve sympathy,
primarily because they are victims of poverty and that is ultimately
what killed them.

BTW, http://www.petswelcome.com lists pet-friendly hotel chains, for
anyone who might need this info, in the US.  Everyone should have an
evacuation plan in case of natural disaster, war, fire, etc.

-L.
Barb from before - 31 Aug 2005 14:05 GMT
Very poor people do take bus rides.  I do sympathize with the homeless
person and his cat.  Some of the people in the big superdome were elderly,
some were disabled.  Ten thousand people were not without cars.  Some who
were interviewed just admitted outright that they waited too long and then
the road out was gridlocked.

Some big hotshot, I don't know if it was the governor of Mississippi, stated
the day before, "I don't believe in nighttime evacuations."

--
Barb
Of course I don't look busy,
I did it right the first time.
Karen - 31 Aug 2005 15:26 GMT
Have you been to LA? I can well believe 10 thousand people were without
cars. That has to be the poorest place in the U.S.

> Very poor people do take bus rides.  I do sympathize with the homeless
> person and his cat.  Some of the people in the big superdome were elderly,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Of course I don't look busy,
> I did it right the first time.
Brian Beuchaw - 31 Aug 2005 20:26 GMT
> Have you been to LA? I can well believe 10 thousand people were without
> cars. That has to be the poorest place in the U.S.

Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana are pretty much the poorest states in
the USA.  And the reports of people without cars in New Orleans said that
at least 100,000 don't have cars (and another report said it was even
higher than that).

Yes, there were idiots who had cars, but didn't evacuate, but I would
guess that the vast majority of the people who stayed just couldn't get
out because they didn't have transportation.

brian
Signature

If you want to reply to this message by mail, you will
have to change the reply address to beuchaw@beuchaw.net

Kitkat - 01 Sep 2005 00:50 GMT
>>Have you been to LA? I can well believe 10 thousand people were without
>>cars. That has to be the poorest place in the U.S.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> brian

Not to mention that if you DO have a car, who the hell can afford gas
these days!!!!
Diane - 01 Sep 2005 01:51 GMT
> > Have you been to LA? I can well believe 10 thousand people were without
> > cars. That has to be the poorest place in the U.S.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> at least 100,000 don't have cars (and another report said it was even
> higher than that).

You don't have to be poor not to have a car. A number of people I know
in Chicago (I'm one of them) don't have cars because they'd be more
trouble and expense than they're worth, when there's a pretty extensive
public transportation system.
Signature

Web site: http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/
Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

Brian Beuchaw - 01 Sep 2005 17:13 GMT
>> Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana are pretty much the poorest states in
>> the USA.  And the reports of people without cars in New Orleans said that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> trouble and expense than they're worth, when there's a pretty extensive
> public transportation system.

Agreed (I'm in Downers Grove, but worked in the Loop for years), but from
what I've heard, a large part of the car-less in New Orleans are really
too poor to own one.  Their mass transit system is good, but not great
(streetcars and buses), and after having been down there many times, I
don't think I'd want to depend on it to get to work, grocery shopping,
etc. unless I had to.  Most southern-type cities don't have a great mass
transit system due to large areas and not enough money to build one (of
course, the CTA doesn't have enough money to have a great system either
:-)). It's a little better than most mass transit systems in the south (I
grew up in OKC, and their mass transit system was a joke - buses that
covered a negligible percentage of the large area of the city).

Anyway, more to the point - please donate to whatever organization you
feel like to help these thousands (tens, hundreds of thousands?) of folks
that have nothing now.  www.redcross.org is currently not working, but I
imagine it will be back soon.

brian
Signature

If you want to reply to this message by mail, you will
have to change the reply address to beuchaw@beuchaw.net

svendlho@aol.com - 30 Aug 2005 19:43 GMT
Seriously. What would a pet owner do? We have 3 cats and 2 dogs and
pobably would have left in plenty of time to get somewhere besides the
Superdome, but we'd have had to hide them in some hotel or something if
we had no local family. Seems likely that no pets would be the policy
at all shelters.

Carl in CT

________________________________________________________________________________
check out my online Art Gallery:
http://ceb364.deviantart.com/gallery/

buy some of my prints:
http://ceb364.deviantart.com/store/

_______________________________________________________________________________
Karen - 30 Aug 2005 20:35 GMT
I noticed it seems like many hotels are now waving the no pet thing in these
instances.

> Seriously. What would a pet owner do? We have 3 cats and 2 dogs and
> pobably would have left in plenty of time to get somewhere besides the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl in CT

____________________________________________________________________________
____
> check out my online Art Gallery:
> http://ceb364.deviantart.com/gallery/
>
> buy some of my prints:
> http://ceb364.deviantart.com/store/

____________________________________________________________________________
___
Barb from before - 31 Aug 2005 14:05 GMT
> Seriously. What would a pet owner do? We have 3 cats and 2 dogs and
> pobably would have left in plenty of time to get somewhere besides the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl in CT

Right, you would leave in plenty of time and sneak the pets in where you
could if you had to.

Barb
Of course I don't look busy,
I did it right the first time.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.