Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kennel question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Helen - 11 Jul 2005 19:25 GMT
God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
letter word, "kennel". Why are kennels considered so bad? My cats always go
to the cattery (or kennels) when we're in the UK and they have plenty of
space, including their own private run, and are very well cared for. I'm
assuming all US kennels are 2 ft x 2 ft x 2 ft, judging by the posts here,
but maybe, just possibly, if Conan is in a kennel it's as nice as the ones I
pay for for my cats in UK?

Helen
tracyrose@gmail.com - 11 Jul 2005 19:38 GMT
If the cat is in the kennel that Mary suspects he is, and it seems
logical to me, then no, he doesn't have a private run. He's in a
contained cage area and has a daily play visit to a larger area. I
don't think anyone thinks he is being maltreated or abused there, it's
simply a question of being transferred around from shelter to home to
hospital to shelter to cattery in less than six weeks, while
arrangements for a home of his own have been stymied for reasons that
are, at best, unclear. Based on the newspaper advertisements, it seems
that all existing applicants have been rejected, and no new ones have
emerged, so the cats future remains somewhat spotty, and at a tariff of
$12/day plus the cost of classified ads, the arrangement has to be
somewhat temporary. It all seems somewhat unnecessary for a cat who was
offered three permanent living arrrangements two weeks ago.
Philip - 11 Jul 2005 20:22 GMT
> If the cat is in the kennel that Mary suspects he is, and it
> seems
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> unnecessary for a cat who was offered three permanent living
> arrrangements two weeks ago.

BTW, who placed those local newspaper ads?  Were they placed on
Monica's behalf without her knowledge?
tracyrose@gmail.com - 11 Jul 2005 20:26 GMT
How would I know? I thought you knew everyting. Guess not.
Philip - 12 Jul 2005 02:49 GMT
> How would I know? I thought you knew everyting. Guess not.

I know only from what is factual so the rhetorical question has
an answer I already know.
tracyrose@gmail.com - 11 Jul 2005 20:33 GMT
>BTW, who placed those local newspaper ads?  Were they placed on
>Monica's behalf without her knowledge?

It also seems a little incongrous to me that somebody trying to *help*
place the cat without Monica's knowledge would have changed both the
name and the age of the cat. Anybody from here would have been likely
to continue to call the cat Conan and to describe him as a two year old
cat.
whitershadeofpale - 12 Jul 2005 00:34 GMT
> BTW, who placed those local newspaper ads?  Were they placed on
> Monica's behalf without her knowledge?

What's wrong Philip, remote control not working?

Curtain a little too heavy
Philip - 12 Jul 2005 02:49 GMT
>> BTW, who placed those local newspaper ads?  Were they placed
>> on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Curtain a little too heavy

Just got larger spoon with longer handle.
Mary - 11 Jul 2005 22:10 GMT
> If the cat is in the kennel that Mary suspects he is, and it seems
> logical to me, then no, he doesn't have a private run. He's in a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> somewhat temporary. It all seems somewhat unnecessary for a cat who was
> offered three permanent living arrrangements two weeks ago.

Precisely. It is just pure callous meanness. Meanness in the true sense
of the word--nasty, petty, and spiteful. Do you think Dan Mahoney would
put his cat Harri in there for 2 weeks?
Philip - 12 Jul 2005 02:49 GMT
>> If the cat is in the kennel that Mary suspects he is, and it
>> seems
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> sense of the word--nasty, petty, and spiteful. Do you think Dan
> Mahoney would put his cat Harri in there for 2 weeks?

CAN I put YOU there for a week or two ... all expenses paid so
you can speak from experience, Mary?
-L. - 12 Jul 2005 08:37 GMT
> CAN I put YOU there for a week or two ... all expenses paid so
> you can speak from experience, Mary?

If you do, please give her a big ball of yarn to play with so she can
choke to death.  Please.

-L.
Philip - 12 Jul 2005 15:47 GMT
>> CAN I put YOU there for a week or two ... all expenses paid so
>> you can speak from experience, Mary?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> -L.

Consider it done.  No charge to you.

Bloody Bollocks Mary ... may she someday (soon) rest in peace.
Brandy Alexandre - 11 Jul 2005 20:35 GMT
Helen <helenandcats@DONOTSPAMntlworld.com> wrote in
rec.pets.cats.health+behav:

> God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads,
> so I'm completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Helen

The kennels at the vet's office are larger than that and the
socialized cats are let out to play, and the non-soc get to come out
for a while after the others go back in.  In contrast, the private
kennel I put her in once was HORRIBLE.  I arranged for a double, but
they blocked the opening to the extra space with litter box (I
wanted the double because she doesn't like to share a room with the
box).  And she came back with fleas.

I think you just have to visit your chosen place a few times and how
the animals are acting.  If they look content, as far as boarding
allows, and you trust those who run it, it's not sending them to
hell or boot camp.

Signature

Brandy  Alexandre®
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?

Spot - 11 Jul 2005 21:22 GMT
I think it all depends upon the place you board them at.  You really have to
do your homework and check the place out.  Not only boarding wise but
emergency care to.  I don't board my current cats but in the past I had an
asthmatic cat who required medications daily.  I looked at private
facilities and none of them at the time met my needs.  What I did was
approach the vet who did emergency care on my cat once or twice and asked
about boarding her there.  They usually didn't do that type of service but
since she was so asthmatic and understood my concern about leaving her
somewhere that they might not recognize she's having problems right away the
did it for me.  I could leave then knowing that if she had an attack that
she was at the vets and they could immediately take care of her.  Nothing
happened the few times I boarded her there other than she became really
chummy with the vets cats.

Celeste

> God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
> completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Helen
Mary - 11 Jul 2005 22:08 GMT
> God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
> completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Helen

The kennel is called Four Paws near Highland CA. Google it. There is a "play
room"
but for most of the time the animals are kept in cages. It is only costing
Dan and Monica
$12 a night. Certainly the cheap cost is partly why he is still there.
jmc - 11 Jul 2005 22:22 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Mary exclaimed (11-Jul-05 10:08 PM):

>>God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
>>completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Dan and Monica
> $12 a night. Certainly the cheap cost is partly why he is still there.

$12 a night is cheap?  What's considered normal?  Here in the UK, I keep
Meep in the poshest, most expensive cattery in the area (none of the
others met my requirements, except for one, but this is the one she
prefers), new big runs and awesome care, and it costs me around
$10/night, depending on the exchange rate (£4.50).

And one should *always* check all the catteries in the area carefully.
Talk to other cat owners.  Talk to your vet, some may give a
recommendation.  Ask questions.  Sniff (one of the places looked good,
but reeked of pee).  And pay close attention to how the cats are taking
their 'incarceration'.

jmc
tracyrose@gmail.com - 11 Jul 2005 22:53 GMT
Mary. I know you're upset and I know why, but I'm not sure exaggerating
the depth of the problem is helping a lot. Honestly, I don't think $12
night is cheap. I think it's bloody expensive - more than $400/month.
That is a lot of money to spend on a cat that isn't yours. If the
average adoption at a no-kill shelter takes about a month (I think
that's what Kelly said) and IME it can often take two or three months,
especially if it's kitten season, the cat is NOT on constant display to
people looking for cats, and the standards for adoption have been set
rather high. That's a potential bill of $800+ for this cat rescue. Not
chump change. It makes me worried for the cat, however well-intentioned
people might be.

I also don't honestly think cruelty or abuse are relevant terms. The
cat is not necessarily worse off than he was before Phillip entered his
life and he seems safe from euthanasia. The point is that all of this
moving and waiting and adjusting to different environments and
different people is stressful for an animal. Sometimes it can't be
avoided. In this case, with three homes available, it certainly could
have been. And given that the cat has suffered multiple abandonments
and illness, and could use some stability and TLC, I don't see the
point except to meet human needs to demonstrate who is a better cat
rescuer.
Mary - 11 Jul 2005 23:04 GMT
> Mary. I know you're upset and I know why, but I'm not sure exaggerating
> the depth of the problem is helping a lot. Honestly, I don't think $12
> night is cheap. I think it's bloody expensive - more than $400/month.

It is all relative.

> That is a lot of money to spend on a cat that isn't yours. If the
> average adoption at a no-kill shelter takes about a month (I think
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> chump change. It makes me worried for the cat, however well-intentioned
> people might be.

You appear to be waffling. Point is, $400 a month is chump change to
lots of people. $4000 a month is to some people.

> I also don't honestly think cruelty or abuse are relevant terms. The
> cat is not necessarily worse off than he was before Phillip entered his
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> point except to meet human needs to demonstrate who is a better cat
> rescuer.

I appreciate your input and disagree with you in that cruelty and abuse
are indeed relevant terms. Cats have emotions and this cat was on his way
to a happy home before Dan Mahoney and Monica Towle interfered.
I have some down time at the moment as I am out of town and there is
only so much I can do work-wise. This particular situation is one I was
prepared to act on and am still prepared to act on. There is a place
for creativity in most tasks, after all. :)
tracyrose@gmail.com - 11 Jul 2005 23:08 GMT
No waffling. I find the actions of Monica and crew to be unnecessary,
duplicative, and unfortunate.

I'm just naturally inclined, perhaps, to the less colorful use of
language.

We are in the same place on this, believe me :>
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 12 Jul 2005 03:46 GMT
>, I don't think $12
>night is cheap. I think it's bloody expensive - more than $400/month.

I cannot imagine a business plan that would make it worth anyone's
while to offer boarding for less than $12. Considering overhead,
staffing, litter, food costs plus the need for profit how can anyone
say that $12 is high end?

-mhd
Diane - 12 Jul 2005 04:09 GMT
> >, I don't think $12
> >night is cheap. I think it's bloody expensive - more than $400/month.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> staffing, litter, food costs plus the need for profit how can anyone
> say that $12 is high end?

I don't have my invoice handy, but I think Hodge's bill this trip was
$8.50 a day.
Signature

Web site: http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/
Journal: http://slywy.diaryland.com/

Meghan Noecker - 12 Jul 2005 09:47 GMT
>>, I don't think $12
>>night is cheap. I think it's bloody expensive - more than $400/month.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>staffing, litter, food costs plus the need for profit how can anyone
>say that $12 is high end?

I was thinking this too. You'd have to have a lot of business, cheap
rent, and cheap labor to offer this service at much less. Who would
want a business of scooping poop and cleaning cages if it didn't have
a decent profit?  $12 sounds like a low or very reasonable amount.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Helen - 11 Jul 2005 23:11 GMT
> $12 a night is cheap?  What's considered normal?  Here in the UK, I keep
> Meep in the poshest, most expensive cattery in the area (none of the
> others met my requirements, except for one, but this is the one she
> prefers), new big runs and awesome care, and it costs me around
> $10/night, depending on the exchange rate (£4.50).

You're lucky! (shades of the Four Yorkshiremen here). I paid over £6 a day
per cat two years ago, heating extra. Did get 10% off one cat's bill because
of them sharing, but even so, I was paying almost £18 a day for three cats.
But I checked out many, and this is the best one for us. Harpsie loves
watching the ducks on the duckpond (-;

In any event, it's so much cheaper than the petsitter ($44 a day plus
tax)...

Helen
PawsForThought - 12 Jul 2005 03:02 GMT
> In any event, it's so much cheaper than the petsitter ($44 a day plus
> tax)...
>
> Helen

Wow, Helen, now that's really expensive.  I pay $15 to $20 a day for a
petsitter (and we don't have to pay tax).  My sister found this
wonderful woman that will even stay in your house if you want her to.
We used her for our last trip and Mickey and Meesha fell in love with
her.  The only problem is because she's so popular, you need to book
somewhat in advance.

Lauren

See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
-L. - 12 Jul 2005 08:40 GMT
> $12 a night is cheap?  What's considered normal?

$12/night is about average in CA - most places charge between $10-15.

-L.
Alison - 12 Jul 2005 15:30 GMT
> > The kennel is called Four Paws near Highland CA. Google it. There
is a "play
> room"
> but for most of the time the animals are kept in cages. It is only costing
> Dan and Monica
> $12 a night. Certainly the cheap cost is partly why he is still
there. >>>

Has it been confirmed that Conan is there?
  US catteries must be expensive if 12 dollars is cheap.  Uk charges
vary around the country starting from four or five pounds a day .
Generally the cats have a sleep/eating inside area and an attached
outside area
I hope Conan doesn't have to wait much longer for his forever home.
   Alison
-L. - 12 Jul 2005 08:33 GMT
> God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
> completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Helen

Kennels come in all sizes - some are small rooms. No one knows for sure
whether Conan is even in a kennel.  And most boarding facilities let
the cats out to large playrooms during the day.  Conan is not
suffering.

-L.
Meghan Noecker - 12 Jul 2005 09:36 GMT
>God knows I long ago gave up trying to follow the Conan threads, so I'm
>completely out of touch, but the one thing I don't understand is that four
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>but maybe, just possibly, if Conan is in a kennel it's as nice as the ones I
>pay for for my cats in UK?

Most shelters and kennels have fairly small cages. After all, they are
limited for space and have a ton of cats to place. And they aren't
going to get a lot of attention, and certainly not much exercise.

Personally, I would never board my cat anywhere. Much better to pay
somebody to come to my house. The only time my cats spend in a cage
like that is if they are at the vet for care.

The main problem in this case is that Conan was supposed to be going
to a home, so there was no reason for him to go to a kennel. It's not
going to kill him - it just isn't what we had planned for him.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Helen - 12 Jul 2005 14:28 GMT
> Most shelters and kennels have fairly small cages. After all, they are
> limited for space and have a ton of cats to place. And they aren't
> going to get a lot of attention, and certainly not much exercise.

But this is the bit I don't get. There is a heck of a difference - to me at
least - between a rescue type facility or a vet's office, and a commercial
kennel/cattery. Like I said, my cats go to the UK cattery, with outdoor run
and view of the duckpond. Somewhat different to a cage in a place where they
are waiting to be found a home.

> Personally, I would never board my cat anywhere. Much better to pay
> somebody to come to my house. The only time my cats spend in a cage
> like that is if they are at the vet for care.

I wouldn't put mine in a cage either, but then where they go in England is
not like that.

Actually, this reminds me how many Americans thought Karma would be in a
cage when she was in quarantine. When in fact she had her own room!

Helen
Meghan Noecker - 13 Jul 2005 08:41 GMT
>> Most shelters and kennels have fairly small cages. After all, they are
>> limited for space and have a ton of cats to place. And they aren't
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>and view of the duckpond. Somewhat different to a cage in a place where they
>are waiting to be found a home.

Most commercial kennels, or at least the ones I have seen, do cages. .
They may be a little larger than the vet cages, but they are still
pretty cramped. Definitely not my first choice. I suppose there are
expensive ones with larger spaces
Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.