 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / July 2005Want Proof That Dan Lied to Us?
Anybody? > Anybody? Yes. Candace > > Anybody? > > Yes. > > Candace The first photo is the photo Monica Towle posted today, entitled "Conan Rescued." The second is a photo of Dan with Harri the Roadcat earlier this year. Look carefully at the door panels of the vehicle in the two photos. They are the same--on the same vehicle--Dan Mahoney's vehicle. http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos >> > Anybody? >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos Hmmm... It could be the same vehicle, but I don't think you've got enough pixels to say for sure. However, my judgement on this has swung the other way. If Dan were not involved, Monica or one of her fellow stooges would be quick to tell us how wrong we are. I pretty much take Dan's involvement as a given at this point. Charlie > Hmmm... It could be the same vehicle, but I don't think you've got > enough pixels to say for sure. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Charlie Assuming Dan's van is a Toyota Sienna, a Dodge Caravan, or any other MASS PRODUCED mini van. Those vans are immensely popular. Think about it. As for "...her fellow stooges..." *if* these people had the Payton Place thought processes like you all, then you should expect them to behave like you. But ... they don't. > > > Anybody? > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos Good investigative work... looks like the same door panel to me... guess it goes to show don't ever put anything on the net you don't wanting biting your a.s later. like your home phone number, your street address, the name of your kids, or husband (and no Lyn that was not meant for you)... > > > > Anybody? > > > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > your a.s later. like your home phone number, your street address, the name > of your kids, or husband (and no Lyn that was not meant for you)... And, if you do, you might want to avoid aggravating people. :) > Look carefully at the door panels of the vehicle in the two photos. They are > the same--on the same vehicle--Dan > Mahoney's vehicle. > > http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos Notice in the pictures Monica posted http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?p=999&gid=7817257&uid=3785866 They are very cropped! None of the pictures are the same size... AND...One of these pictures does not belong in the group. It's two different cameras, (you can tell by the clarity) "Conan Playing with his mouse", was not taken in the same place, or with the same camera as "Conan Relaxing". The floor is even different, one floor has LVT, the other does not. > > Look carefully at the door panels of the vehicle in the two photos. They are > > the same--on the same vehicle--Dan [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > The floor is even different, one floor has LVT, the other does not. It's possible it was taken in the kennel section of his luxurious resort and not the overly spacious playroom. >>>Anybody? >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos I don't think they are the same vehicle - here's why: 1. Based on Dan saying in the past that the semi truck he drives is red, and that the color of the vehicle in the second photo is red as seen in the side view mirror this photo was probably taken in his semi truck. Plus the window design in the second photo is consistent with a truck like a semi instead of a passenger vehicle. 2. The vehicle in the first photo is a passenger vehicle. It is too low to the ground to be the same vehicle in the second photo. The color of the vehicle in the first photo is probably white or light colored based on the color of the interior door riser on the left side of the photo. So based on these observations the vehicles in both the photos are most likely not the same. > I don't think they are the same vehicle - here's why: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > So based on these observations the vehicles in both the photos are most > likely not the same. I don't know but from what I have read of Dan's posts in the last few weeks, isn't he currently not driving his semi? I know he and his wife were in an accident in his personal truck and then he had surgery and the way I understand it, he is not driving the semi right now (unless I'm incorrect). I'm also fairly certain that he did not own his semi but worked for a company as a driver. Therefore, would he even have said semi in his possession right now? I assume the photo of Harri is taken in his semi as that is where she was the Roadcat. It also seems as though recently he mentioned that the only vehicle they currently have is his wife's car since it was his personal truck that was totaled in their accident. He said something about how they would have to continue having only that car for awhile since he was going to use the insurance money for his personal truck on Harri's vet bills. Just something to throw into the mix... Candace >> I don't think they are the same vehicle - here's why: >> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Candace He posted that he was delivering a load of fireworks for his brother for the 4th of July. > >> I don't think they are the same vehicle - here's why: > >> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > He posted that he was delivering a load of fireworks for his brother for > the 4th of July. Dan told us that in email. It does not change the fact that he was at home last Tuesday through Saturday and would not answer our emails regarding this issue. He is undoubtedly at home now. I want to believe the best about Dan, but how can I when he is responsible for this cat not going to his forever home and in fact being kept in a cage for another solid week, where he is still. >>>> Anybody? >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > So based on these observations the vehicles in both the photos are most > likely not the same. You are correct on both observations. The vehicles are different. >>>>> Anybody? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >You are correct on both observations. The vehicles are different. Pure conjecture on your part, as much as the other side's. >>>>>> Anybody? >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Pure conjecture on your part, as much as the other side's. I retired from driving line haul. >I< know what a semi truck cab looks like. The door windows on a semi are vertical and they are flat glass. With the exception of Rolls Royce class touring cars, automobiles and most minivans have radiused door/window sills and glass. The window height from the ground is *obviously* closer to the ground in the picture featuring Conan's face. > > > Anybody? > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos Not taking sides, just offering my opinion. The picture with Harri looks like a photo taken in a "rig" (semi-tractor trailer). Look in the rearview mirror, that's the trailer. The picture with Conan doesn't seem high enough off the ground to be taken in a rig. Smokie Darling (Annie) - who has been wrong before. >> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos > > Not taking sides, just offering my opinion. The picture with Harri > looks like a photo taken in a "rig" (semi-tractor trailer). Look in > the rearview mirror, that's the trailer. Not correct. What you see in the lower/covex mirror is the side of the sleeper which is part of the tractor. There is too much rain water on the upper/flat mirror to distinguish the trailer. > The picture with Conan doesn't seem high enough off the ground to be > taken in a rig. > > Smokie Darling (Annie) - Correct. Conan is pictured sitting in a four wheeler. >>> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Correct. Conan is pictured sitting in a four wheeler. After looking at the photos closely, I agree. > >>> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos > >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > After looking at the photos closely, I agree. Look at the angle of the camera, though. In the first one, the camera is way up high, and in the second one it is level with the cat. >>>>> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/crazyaboutfelines/my_photos >>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Look at the angle of the camera, though. In the first one, the camera > is way up high, and in the second one it is level with the cat. Rubbish. > > > > Anybody? > > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Smokie Darling (Annie) - who has been wrong before. Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I don't know much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to argue too much with those who disagree, as time will tell. >>>>> Anybody? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > know much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to argue too > much with those who disagree, as time will tell. Silence does not prove your case, Mary. True, you really know precious little which makes what little you know quite incomplete. If I had a malicious nature like yours, I would treat you like a mushroom. > Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I don't know > much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to argue too much > with those who disagree, as time will tell. Silence does not prove that you are right. Silence proves only that Dan is busy, is on vacation, is in the hospital, doesn't have an internet connection right now, or doesn't want to be harassed by you any more. Silence is never proof of conspiracy theories. > > Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I don't know > > much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to argue too much [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > connection right now, or doesn't want to be harassed by you any more. > Silence is never proof of conspiracy theories. Aww. Marjorie is so cute. Like that legless, armless knight from the Holy Grail, bellowing, "I'll bite yer kneecaps off." :) > > Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I don't know > > much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to argue too much [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > connection right now, or doesn't want to be harassed by you any more. > Silence is never proof of conspiracy theories. Actually he isn't too busy he's managing quite fine to post in the other group, keeping all his paypal friends updated with stories of Harri. You know you never know when you'll need that cashcow again. So I'm guessing he's ignoring this group, which would be all fine if he were on the up and up and wasn't hiding. > > > Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I don't > know [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > he's ignoring this group, which would be all fine if he were on the up and > up and wasn't hiding. Please don't confuse Marjorie with the truth. It interferes with her agenda. >>>> Maybe. But the fact is, Dan's very silence proves I'm right. I >>>> don't know much but I am sure of what I do know. I don't need to [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Please don't confuse Marjorie with the truth. It interferes with her > agenda. Facts create confusion in what passes for (and through) Mary's "mind." Mary's agenda and emotion are the only "facts". > Please don't confuse Marjorie with the truth. It interferes with her agenda. Oh, so now I have an agenda. I'm a bit confused. Can you remind me of what my agenda is? I just can't recall it. Shaking my head in amusement at the audacity of this newest claim. > > Please don't confuse Marjorie with the truth. It interferes with her > agenda. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Shaking my head in amusement at the audacity of this newest claim. Of course you do. How long have you been posting in the Unable-to-Pup group with your best bud Lynnie aka Jonathan's Mom, the half-wit? Now then, please do not strain yourself. When I want input from someone incredibly stupid I will ask Alison. Troll > Path: newssvr31.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!newsfeed-west.nntpserver.com!manticore.nntpserver.com.POSTED!teranews!not-for-mail > From: "Mary" <marys catlovernospam.com> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Anybody? > Troll Ignorant dickhead whackjob. :) > > Path: newssvr31.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy .com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prod igy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed-east.nntpse rver.com!nntpserver.com!newsfeed-west.nntpserver.com!manticore.nntpserver.co m.POSTED!teranews!not-for-mail > > From: "Mary" <marys catlovernospam.com> > > Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > > > Anybody? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.