Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Indoor-only and outdoor cat in same household

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alex - 07 Jun 2005 16:07 GMT
Is it possible (or common) to have an indoor only cat and one that roams
outside, in the same house?  We were thinking of getting a purebred indoor
cat (perhaps Burmese) alongside our existing 3 y-o moggy Khamun who goes out
as he pleases via a catflap.  One way would be, I suppose, to have a
magnetic flap which only opens for Khamun and not the purebred.  But it
would be a bit strange for the purebred to see his companion going out, and
finding he can't. Or maybe he wouldn't have any desire to.

We're out at work all day and keep the cat in the kitchen with the catflap
in the back door, so we could keep another cat in the remainder of the house
without access to the kitchen - but the whole point of our getting another
cat was to allow them to play etc, so keeping them apart all day would
defeat the purpose, I suppose...unless playing together when we're there but
not during the day (or night) would not be cruel.  But then they'd only be
together for 4 or so hours out of 24.

Are there any purebred breeds who can roam outside, or we really restricted
to moggies?  Without wishing to start a indoor v outside heated debate of
course!

Thanks

Alex
Mary - 07 Jun 2005 16:26 GMT
> Is it possible (or common) to have an indoor only cat and one that roams
> outside, in the same house?  We were thinking of getting a purebred indoor
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Alex

Alex, I don't understand. You seem to be assuming that it is safer for a
mixed-breed cat to wander than for a "pure bred" one to do so? Why would
you assume that?
Steve G - 07 Jun 2005 18:42 GMT
(...)

> Alex, I don't understand. You seem to be assuming that it is safer for a
> mixed-breed cat to wander than for a "pure bred" one to do so? Why would
> you assume that?

I think it's more prosaic than that: To take a purebred cat home, you
invariably (?) need to agree to keep it indoors only, at least in the
USA. So, if the OP adopts a PB cat, then assuming he wishes to stick to
his side of the bargain, he'll have an indoor and an indoor/outdoor cat
by default.

(In fact, the journal article of Rochlitz I've occasionally referred to
suggests that PB cats are *less* likely than moggies to be involved in
a RTA (in the UK). However, this is almost certainly due to the
mediating factor of owner behaviour, rather than PB cats being
smarter.)

Steve.
Alex Panda - 07 Jun 2005 19:47 GMT
> Alex, I don't understand. You seem to be assuming that it is safer for a
> mixed-breed cat to wander than for a "pure bred" one to do so? Why would
> you assume that?

Well, from what I've read many breeds like Burmese don't have such good
survival instincts outside, and most sites seem to say that they should be
kept indoors.  I assume that most, say, Bengal owners don't allow them to
roam but maybe I'm wrong.

Cheers for the response, I'd be interested if there are any purebred cat
owners who could tell me if they allow their cats to roam - I'm in the UK
where roaming sems more common.
Mary - 07 Jun 2005 19:56 GMT
> > Alex, I don't understand. You seem to be assuming that it is safer for a
> > mixed-breed cat to wander than for a "pure bred" one to do so? Why would
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> owners who could tell me if they allow their cats to roam - I'm in the UK
> where roaming sems more common.

I think maybe Steve G. has an answer for you. I wish I could help but
you and I are at opposite ends of experience: I am in the US, have only
had moggies and have never let them roam. Growing up we had some
that did and they all got run over, poisoned, etc. I understand things
are different in the UK. Good luck.
Steve G - 07 Jun 2005 21:23 GMT
(...)

> > Well, from what I've read many breeds like Burmese don't have such good
> > survival instincts outside, and most sites seem to say that they should be
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I think maybe Steve G. has an answer for you.

Not really. The Rochlitz study (Vet Rec 2003: 549 - 553) found that
purebred cats were as third as likely as moggies to be involved in a
RTA. This indicates i) at least some purebred cats in the UK have
roaming outdoor access, ii) the reduced risk of RTA probably means that
the purebred cats were restricted more (by the owner) in their
movements than moggies. The sample size in the study was small,
however.

I doubt there's any evidence that purebreds have somehow had their
'survival instinct' bred out of them. Or, in other words, if you want
to keep a purebred indoors, a reason to do this is not because they are
especially stupid wrt the outdoors! Indeed, Rochlitz suggests that
purebreds 'may have behavioural characteristics that reduce their risk
of being in a road accident'. Just handwaving though, is that, and I
would take it with a pinch of salt.

Put it like this: the logic for keeping a purebred indoors applies just
as well to a mog, with the exception that perhaps purebreds would be
more likely to be stolen than moggies, which feeds into the equation
somewhere...

S.
Mary - 07 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT
"Steve G" <news@stevethepsycho.co.uk> wrote:> > >

> > I think maybe Steve G. has an answer for you.
>
> Not really. The Rochlitz study (Vet Rec 2003: 549 - 553) found that
> purebred cats were as third as likely as moggies to be involved in a
> RTA.

"as third as likely??????"

This indicates i) at least some purebred cats in the UK have
> roaming outdoor access, ii) the reduced risk of RTA probably means that
> the purebred cats were restricted more (by the owner) in their
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> more likely to be stolen than moggies, which feeds into the equation
> somewhere...

Well you know I will not argue with this. ;0)
Steve G - 07 Jun 2005 21:50 GMT
> "Steve G" <news@stevethepsycho.co.uk> wrote:> > >
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> "as third as likely??????"

Or, in other words, being a moggy was associated with 3-times the
chance of the cat being in an RTA (odds ratio of ~0.3 for pedigree vs.
non-pedigree status in their regression model).

Also, 3% of cats in the RTA population were pedigree, vs. 11% in the
population of cats that had never been in an RTA.

(...)

> > Put it like this: the logic for keeping a purebred indoors applies just
> > as well to a mog, with the exception that perhaps purebreds would be
> > more likely to be stolen than moggies, which feeds into the equation
> > somewhere...
>
> Well you know I will not argue with this. ;0)

Indeed, indeed. Mind you, replace 'indoors' with 'outdoors' and it
still means the same, as long as we ignore any latent emotional
content...

Steve.
Mary - 07 Jun 2005 22:09 GMT
> > "Steve G" <news@stevethepsycho.co.uk> wrote:> > >
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> chance of the cat being in an RTA (odds ratio of ~0.3 for pedigree vs.
> non-pedigree status in their regression model).

Oh oh oh, ONE THIRD as likely. Meaning that mogs are three times
as likely. Okay.
Sandra - 07 Jun 2005 20:48 GMT
I have two Brithish Shorthairs. One is a little over a year old, the other
six months younger. Memphis and Phoenix are both kept indoors. Phoenix would
like to go out, but I think Memphis is more scared!  We are planning to move
to Spain in the future, so they will gain access to the outside, simply
because we would find it near impossible to keep them in when it is hot.

I had not heard of breeders making you agree to keep them inside before!

Signature

Sandra

Mary - 07 Jun 2005 21:11 GMT
> I have two Brithish Shorthairs. One is a little over a year old, the other
> six months younger. Memphis and Phoenix are both kept indoors. Phoenix would
> like to go out, but I think Memphis is more scared!  We are planning to move
> to Spain in the future, so they will gain access to the outside, simply
> because we would find it near impossible to keep them in when it is hot.

This is because there are few screened windows and doors, many
places are not air conditioned, and so the doors and windows are
left open, as in other parts of Europe?
Sandra - 08 Jun 2005 21:36 GMT
In Spain almost all houses have grilles fitted to doors and windows so that
they can be left open. To run air con all the time is very expensive, even
if it is fitted.  It  would be near impossible to stop a cat from venturing
outside if it wanted to. It's bad enough in the uk, Phoenix is downright
sneaky!

Signature

Sandra

Mary - 09 Jun 2005 03:32 GMT
> In Spain almost all houses have grilles fitted to doors and windows so that
> they can be left open. To run air con all the time is very expensive, even
> if it is fitted.  It  would be near impossible to stop a cat from venturing
> outside if it wanted to. It's bad enough in the uk, Phoenix is downright
> sneaky!

So the cats can go throught he grills?
Sandra - 09 Jun 2005 10:31 GMT
Yes. no problem. They are security grilles to stop humans getting in - a cat
should fit through easily.

Signature

Sandra

Monique Y. Mudama - 07 Jun 2005 16:29 GMT
> Are there any purebred breeds who can roam outside, or we really
> restricted to moggies?  Without wishing to start a indoor v outside
> heated debate of course!

*snicker* good luck with that.

Why do you assume that purebreds can't go outside, but moggies can?
The only added risk I can imagine is theft, which is actually a
problem for moggies as well, as they can both be sold to labs.

My moggie stays indoors and is perfectly happy with that situation.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.