Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Not sure what my cat's vet did was "kosher" or not - need help please.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dark_joan@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2005 05:29 GMT
Hi everybody ... couldn't find an answer to this on the 'net so I
thought I'd try you guys.  Hope you don't mind a stranger just barging
in here with a question!

Here's my situation -- my kitty was sick a little while ago (bad
reaction to some flea foam) so I took him to a vet in town; she was a
new vet to him; he's indoors only and he doesn't have a regular vet.
She ran a gazillion tests on him, even did xrays and sonograms, each
time saying the test was "inconclusive" and recommending more tests and
procedures.  At this point, I had already paid her $2,000 for all her
work and tests!  Next on her "to do" list for him was a biopsy of his
intestine.  Well, I was not comfortable with having my boy put under
anesthesia and cut into when he was acting fine (eating, drinking,
playing as normal).  Also, as you might imagine, I was quite emotional
with worry over my kitty, wondering if he was going to die or if I'd
have to make a decision to put him to sleep eventually or what!

So I asked the vet if she would talk to my friend, since I was unable
to absorb all the information the vet was giving me due to my emotional
state and I wanted my friend who was removed and could be objective and
analytical to hear from the doctor what was wrong with my boy.  The vet
wouldn't talk to my friend unless I paid her.  This seemed odd, since I
didn't see how this request would be any different than say, for
example, if I was married and asked the vet "Hey could you talk to my
husband about the cat's condition because I'm just too emotional to
understand all you are telling me."

Secondly, I wanted a second opinion on my cat before having him cut
open and biopsied.  I wanted to take him to my previous vet 40 miles
away who has an excellent reputation.  I asked the vet for my cat's
xrays so I could take them with me.  I paid over $100 for these xrays
and I would think they are basically my personal property not the
vet's, but I don't know for sure - so that is question 1.  Are the
xrays my *property"?   Second question -- the vet charged me $30 for
the xrays, a "handling" charge if you will.  Now, mind you, the xrays
were only a few days old and were still on her shelf in my cat's file;
it's not like she had to send off to some off-site storage facility to
retrieve his xrays.  So, question #2 is, is it customary for a vet to
charge to give me (actually "lend", as I had to sign a paper saying I'd
bring the xrays back to her office) my cat's xrays that I already paid
for when he first got xrayed?

I paid for the xrays, took my cat to my old vet, the vet looked at the
xrays and all the tests that the other vet faxed over and asked me "Why
is this cat here? He's fine!"

So, clearly, in hindsight, this first vet was just all about the money.
So now I am mad and wondering if there's some sort of action I can
take against the first vet.  You know, at the very least I'd like to do
a chargeback on the $30 I paid for the xrays - not that $30 matters to
me, but it's just the danged *principle* of the thing.  Plus, since
this vet seems to be all about the money, I'm hoping it would tick her
off a little.  Especially after she took me for $2,000 and, worst of
all, put me in quite the emotional state wondering about my kitty's
health.

What do you all think?

Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!
sriddles@aol.com - 01 Jun 2005 05:42 GMT
> So, clearly, in hindsight, this first vet was just all about the money.
>  So now I am mad and wondering if there's some sort of action I can
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!

I don't think you have much of a chance trying to recoup any of the
money. First of all, it's her "policy" to charge a fee to hand over
x-rays (a poor policy for sure, but it's not illegal or anything). And
if she did indeed perform all the tests she *said* she did, there's
nothing really *illegal* about it -- unethical, yeah, but not illegal.
You could still try, but attorney fees would cost far more than it was
worth.
But I wonder if you maybe could file a formal complaint with the
Veterinary Board in your state listing exhorbitant fees and unnecessary
testing.

Sherry

Sherry
equalizer - 01 Jun 2005 10:04 GMT
>Hi everybody ... couldn't find an answer to this on the 'net so I
>thought I'd try you guys.  Hope you don't mind a stranger just barging
>in here with a question!

<SNIP>

I'm not sure I have everything all sorted out to fully understand the
problem. Could you perhaps post this vet's name, address, and phone
number? That would be a good start.

thanks!

eq
KellyH - 01 Jun 2005 10:49 GMT
<snip>

> I paid for the xrays, took my cat to my old vet, the vet looked at the
> xrays and all the tests that the other vet faxed over and asked me "Why
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!

Like Sherry said, there is nothing illegal per se about what this vet did.
Scummy and unethical yes, but not illegal.  The most you can do at this
point is write a letter of complaint and spread your story to other pet
owners about how she bilked you.
I've never heard of charging an X-ray handling fee, for pets or people.
A question though, after your kitty recovered and was fine, on what basis
was she saying that he still needed further tests?  How sick did your cat
get?  Was he just not feeling well, or did he need to be hospitalized?  For
a possible poisoning, I would think all that is needed is maybe some fluids
to help flush out the toxin, and bloodwork to make sure all organs are
functioning.

-Kelly
Karen - 01 Jun 2005 12:41 GMT
> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> -Kelly

I was wondering this too. I also thought it was extremely strange that she
would charge for talking to your friend (a good idea btw I thought.) Sounds
like a real piece of work.
Janet B - 01 Jun 2005 12:55 GMT
>I was wondering this too. I also thought it was extremely strange that she
>would charge for talking to your friend (a good idea btw I thought.) Sounds
>like a real piece of work.

There's talking and there's talking.  A consultation fee is not
unusual at all.  Now, if the OP had said "I can't understand this -
I'm handing the phone to my friend", that's one thing.  Setting up a
consultation (even on the phone) with the friend is a whole 'nuther
ball of wax.  I paid for a surgical consult with a specialist once,
just to get all of my facts and options before deciding whether or not
to do the surgery.  I believe it was something on the order of $60.
For an expensive and potentially fatal surgery with a long recovery
time, on an elderly animal, it was the right thing to do.

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Karen - 01 Jun 2005 15:06 GMT
> >I was wondering this too. I also thought it was extremely strange that she
> >would charge for talking to your friend (a good idea btw I thought.) Sounds
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> For an expensive and potentially fatal surgery with a long recovery
> time, on an elderly animal, it was the right thing to do.

Well, when you say you asked the vet to talk to your friend because you are
too emotional to take it all in, it does NOT sound like a "consultation" to
me. It sounds like, you want the vet to tell your friend what they told you
so that you don't miss anything. I say that is a piece of work and a lot of
gall to ask for an extra fee.
Janet B - 01 Jun 2005 18:23 GMT
>Well, when you say you asked the vet to talk to your friend because you are
>too emotional to take it all in, it does NOT sound like a "consultation" to
>me. It sounds like, you want the vet to tell your friend what they told you
>so that you don't miss anything. I say that is a piece of work and a lot of
>gall to ask for an extra fee.

But none of us know exactly how the conversation went.  Also, this was
not a vet who had the OP and her cat as clients.  The visit sounded
more like an ER visit.

Would I expect MY vet to talk to someone of my choosing, if I was
upset and couldn't cope?  Sure.  But that's because I'm a regular
client, who visits the vet with may animals even if I don't vaccinate.

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

MaryL - 01 Jun 2005 18:52 GMT
I apologize if this message doesn't transmit correctly -- I'm visiting
my sister and am using google to read this NG (and post my response).

I don't think your vet did anything that could specifically be called
"illegal," but I would *run* -- *not walk* -- to another vet.  From
your description, it seems that your vet's basic concern is profit, not
the welfare of your cat.  However, do be sure to get a complete record
of all tests and procedures that the vet performed.  You paid for it,
and you are entitled to a copy of the results.  If necessary, ask your
new vet to request the records.  As to the actual X-Rays:  many clinic
concern them to be their property, but most will permit the client to
borrow them as long as they are returned (just as with X-Rays for
people).

One last (but important) point:  I noticed that you said you cat had a
bad reaction to flea foam.  *Do not* use over-the-counter flea
preparations.  There have been numerous reports of bad reactions --
even death -- to some of them (especially Hartz).  In this case, only
use products that you obtain from your vet (your *new* vet, I hope).
Advantage and Frontline are usually recommended by vets in the U.S.

MaryL
Karen - 01 Jun 2005 19:19 GMT
> >Well, when you say you asked the vet to talk to your friend because you are
> >too emotional to take it all in, it does NOT sound like a "consultation" to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> upset and couldn't cope?  Sure.  But that's because I'm a regular
> client, who visits the vet with may animals even if I don't vaccinate.

If  the vet isn't talking about a *different* cat and a different exam, how
on earth could they want a "consultation" fee to talk to a person of my
choosing? Makes no sense whatsoever, emergency vet or not.
Janet B - 01 Jun 2005 19:23 GMT
>If  the vet isn't talking about a *different* cat and a different exam, how
>on earth could they want a "consultation" fee to talk to a person of my
>choosing? Makes no sense whatsoever, emergency vet or not.

I think we're all speculating and none of us were there.  I've read
more "the bastard vet" stories on newsgroups over the years, and I
always try to remember that I'm only hearing ONE SIDE of the story,
from an upset pet owner.  Not exactly a transcript of what actually
happened.  Is the vet awful?  Maybe.  Maybe not.    Things aren't
always what they seem.

Signature

Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album

Karen - 01 Jun 2005 19:37 GMT
Well, bully for you. I'm saying that *if* a vet actually did this, it's a
pretty dirty thing to do.

> >If  the vet isn't talking about a *different* cat and a different exam, how
> >on earth could they want a "consultation" fee to talk to a person of my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> happened.  Is the vet awful?  Maybe.  Maybe not.    Things aren't
> always what they seem.
Meghan Noecker - 01 Jun 2005 23:49 GMT
>>Well, when you say you asked the vet to talk to your friend because you are
>>too emotional to take it all in, it does NOT sound like a "consultation" to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>not a vet who had the OP and her cat as clients.  The visit sounded
>more like an ER visit.

After $2000 in tests, I would say a consultation should be included.
Whether it was with her or somebody who wasn't crying shouldn't
matter.

I didn't have to pay for the 15 minute talk with the vet about
Maynard's bloodwork. And they didn't charge me an office call when
they demonstrated how to give fluids. They charged me for the fluids
and the meds.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Meghan Noecker - 01 Jun 2005 23:42 GMT
>Well, when you say you asked the vet to talk to your friend because you are
>too emotional to take it all in, it does NOT sound like a "consultation" to
>me. It sounds like, you want the vet to tell your friend what they told you
>so that you don't miss anything. I say that is a piece of work and a lot of
>gall to ask for an extra fee.

When I needed the bloodwork results for Maynard, I asked them to ask
for my mom or dad, as I get choked up and cannot speak, and it would
be over the phone. The next day, I realized they had my private phone
line on file, not the house line. My parents had gone out on errands,
and my sister dropped in, so I had her call in. They went ahead and
talked to her, and she asked the questions I had written down, and
there was never any problem.

I also had no problem getting a printout of the bloodwork, including
the work done a couple years earlier.

And previously, I had no problem getting an older x-ray from an old
vet after I moved away.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

PawsForThought - 01 Jun 2005 13:16 GMT
> Here's my situation -- my kitty was sick a little while ago (bad
> reaction to some flea foam) so I took him to a vet in town; she was a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> with worry over my kitty, wondering if he was going to die or if I'd
> have to make a decision to put him to sleep eventually or what!

Sorry to hear of your situation, and glad your kitty is ok.  This vet
sounds pretty unethical, but as others have said, it wouldn't be worth
trying to get your money back, and I agree with whoever said to make a
complaint against the vet to your state's vet board.  It would be
interesting to find out if there have been other complaints made
against her.

As for the flea foam, as you now know, these flea preps can be very
dangerous.  You say your cat is indoors only.  Does he actually have
fleas? Personally, I don't believe in using chemical insecticides
unless absolutely necessary.

I don't see it as a consultation to have the vet speak to your friend
in order to help explain things to you more clearly, and charging a
consultation fee was not the right thing to do, IMO.  She should have
spoken to your friend as a courtesy.  It's not like you just walked in
off the street and wanted the vet to diagnose your cat for free, then
speak to your friend.  Sounds to me like the vet was taking advantage
of your emotional state, and didn't want someone neutral to take part
in the relationship, since your friend may very well have seen through
her.

Lauren
Brandy  Alexandre - 01 Jun 2005 14:32 GMT
<dark_joan@yahoo.com> wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:

> So, clearly, in hindsight, this first vet was just all about the
> money.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> $2,000 and, worst of all, put me in quite the emotional state
> wondering about my kitty's health.

All vet's have different policies about x-rays, but I can tell you that
cat had x-rays recently at the emergency vet and they just gave them to
me for her "day" vet.  Since she had x-rays for the same issue before,
and I had moved to another state (just visiting Los Angeles), I went
over to my old vet's office and asked if I could have the x-rays from a
couple years ago so the new vet in the new state could have the record.  
They also simply gave them to me.

Make of that what you will

Signature

Brandy  Alexandre®
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?

Innovo - 01 Jun 2005 15:02 GMT
***I would dump that vet, ASAP. Politely and firmly ask/demand that your
x-rays and records to be faxed to your newly appointed vet. You owe them/her
no explanation. She/ old vet, is obviously incompetent and unbelievably
greedy and selfish. I would also advise you to report her to the better
business bureau.

No telling how many more other people she's ripped off, and how many animals
she's caused a large amount of unnecessary stress and pain.

ML

> Hi everybody ... couldn't find an answer to this on the 'net so I
> thought I'd try you guys.  Hope you don't mind a stranger just barging
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!
Lesley - 01 Jun 2005 15:40 GMT
She/ old vet, is obviously incompetent and unbelievably
greedy and selfish.

Like the vet a friend of mine was forced to use. His wife had a cat he
had given her when he took a job abroad when they first met and he had
to do this to buy and furnish their first home together. When the cat
got to be 16+ he became ill and off they went to this new vet. For a
little while the treatments worked and the cat was well and happy but
after a couple of years the treatments stopped working and the cat had
no quality of life whatsoever, he was at the vet's almost every week
and when not at the vets he was lying on his bed uninterested in food
and having to be taken to his litter box as he could only walk a few
steps....But she couldn't bear to lose her "baby" and the vet saw her
coming and colluded shamelessly with her, suggesting more
investigations, more treatments, maybe "this one will do the trick" and
"we haven't tried this one". My friend actually asked the vet about
putting the poor cat out of his misery and his wife gave him the sort
of look that suggested sooner him than her cat....He tried to change
vets but his wife was so convinced that this "vet" was all that was
keeping her "baby" alive she gave him another "sooner you than him"
look

Anyway he spent over £6,000 on this cat and the cat had a miserable
last two or so years before even the vet had to admit that it was
kinder to let him go (He probably thought "this cat is not going to
last more than a few days so I'll grab the last few bob out of it
rather than letting it die peacefully at home"- incidentally in that
sentence I am using "it", which I never normally do but that is how
this particular vet was with cats apparently)

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
Philip - 01 Jun 2005 16:37 GMT
snip
> Anyway he spent over £6,000 on this cat and the cat had a miserable
> last two or so years before even the vet had to admit that it was
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Slave of the Fabulous Furballs

SIX THOUSAND British Pounds?  WHAT!

That's $10,800 USD !  The vet discovered he had a Big Fish with deep
pockets. At this level, I don't feel sorry at all for the cat's owner.
Phil P. - 01 Jun 2005 19:37 GMT
> snip
> > Anyway he spent over £6,000 on this cat and the cat had a miserable
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> That's $10,800 USD !  The vet discovered he had a Big Fish with deep
> pockets.

No, she just has an emotional capacity that you're lacking so it transcends
your understanding.

>At this level, I don't feel sorry at all for the cat's owner.

You don't feel anything- you're emotionally dead.  You need to ignite other
peoples' emotions to feel alive.

You're a half-dead decrepit, old sociopath. Your only redeeming quality is
that you're dying-- unforfunately, not fast enough.

I feel sorry your cats and any cats that come in contact with you.
Lesley - 02 Jun 2005 11:06 GMT
That's $10,800 USD !  The vet discovered he had a Big Fish with deep
pockets. At this level, I don't feel sorry at all for the cat's owner

And bear in mind this was something like 10 years ago when £6,000 was
worth a lot more than it is now

Lesley

Slave of the Fabulous Furballs
Philip - 02 Jun 2005 13:44 GMT
Philip wrote:
>> That's $10,800 USD !  The vet discovered he had a Big Fish with deep
>> pockets. At this level, I don't feel sorry at all for the cat's owner
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Lesley

You're kidding.  No ... you're not kidding.  Well, I have absolutely no
sympathy for this owner in particular.
dark_joan@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2005 21:54 GMT
> snip
> > Anyway he spent over £6,000 on this cat and the cat had a miserable
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> That's $10,800 USD !  The vet discovered he had a Big Fish with deep
> pockets. At this level, I don't feel sorry at all for the cat's owner.

Hey, Philip, it's really easy for the $$ to add up.  First there's a
couple hundred dollars for this test, then a few hundred more for
another test, etc.  It's hard, especially for a person so attached to
their pet, to say "Hey, I'd rather have $200 than my cat, so forget it
doc!"  It's not like the vet charged the 6,000 lbs. British all at
once.  They just string you along, and then it adds up.  This is a sad
story that the poster mentioned about this British cat owner.  I **do**
feel sorry for her, and for her kitty whose life was extended
unnecessarily and had little to no quality of life in its last years.

Ursula.
Philip - 03 Jun 2005 00:57 GMT
>> snip
>>> Anyway he spent over £6,000 on this cat and the cat had a miserable
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Hey, Philip, it's really easy for the $$ to add up.
snip
> Ursula.

When any pet is a defacto surrogate child ... I have no empathy for what
follows.
mlbriggs - 01 Jun 2005 19:11 GMT
> ***I would dump that vet, ASAP. Politely and firmly ask/demand that your
> x-rays and records to be faxed to your newly appointed vet. You owe
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>>
>> Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!

And -- file a complaint with the licensing board or department of business
regulation.   MLB
MK - 01 Jun 2005 15:46 GMT
> Hi everybody ... couldn't find an answer to this on the 'net so I
> thought I'd try you guys.  Hope you don't mind a stranger just barging
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance **SO MUCH** !!!

The x-rays are legally the property of the clinic.  If you request them, the
clinic should loan them to you without any fuss.  You are obligated to bring
them back.  The clinic has to keep them for a set amount of time.  I think
it's something like 5 years, but it varies by state.  You can have them sent
out to be copied at your expense, then keep the copies.  I have also taken
digital photos of x-rays for people to have.

We don't usually charge any handling fees unless we are mailing them
somewhere.  It's not a frequent request.  I suppose you could charge a
deposit type of fee to encourage someone to bring them back.

MK DVM
dark_joan@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2005 21:58 GMT
Thanks, everyone, for your helpful responses and interesting related
stories.  I am finished forever with this first vet, and am now taking
my kitty to my former vet several towns away whom I trust completely.
My kitty may not like the 45 minute drive vs. the 5 minute drive, but
too bad for him because he's going to a better doctor!  :)  I came here
because I wanted to get a feel for if my instincts about this first vet
were correct or not, and you all helped me with that a lot!  Thanks,
and bless all of you for your kindness!   :-)

Ursula.
bigbadbarry - 02 Jun 2005 22:29 GMT
>  Thanks,
> and bless all of you for your kindness!   :-)
>
> Ursula.

Maybe your cat likes Bruce Springsteen, that should chill him out for
the ride. I don't know who told me, wether on here or in real life hehe

but..The ladies cat, loved to ride, the cat would perch on the headrest
and look over her shoulder. Now that I think about it, it was the pizza
lady. haha

I wouldn't mind a cat like that, it's better than hearing them sound
like thier in heat or something.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.