Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Morning after pill

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 01:55 GMT
I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
having to worry about the population.

This could work for a pet, I realize a homeless cat would miss too many
pills.
KellyH - 20 May 2005 02:48 GMT
>I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
> having to worry about the population.
>
> This could work for a pet, I realize a homeless cat would miss too many
> pills.

No.

Signature

-Kelly

bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 03:59 GMT
> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> > the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> -Kelly

Im just kind of using this as a sounding board, kind of thinking
outloud that's all.

A pill disguised as a tasty cat treat, could help in reducing the
population. If humans can do this, and it does work, I know it can be
made for cats.

Of course the ongoing cost of these pills would ultimately cost more
than surgury, although...for example, I read a post on her, a lady was
feeding strays but could not catch all of them.

Feeble at worst, but supportive of the goal, to reduce and eliminate
homeless sickly cats.

Just like pennies, some people scatter them about their homes, in their
car consoles...I save them, them little brown fellas ad up. In the same
way, enough people across the country, slipping birth control to enough
cats, this could help humans catch up with the problem. I don't think
this is a stand alone solution, it's just a penny idea.
sriddles@aol.com - 20 May 2005 04:09 GMT
> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> > the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> -Kelly

Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
(Patch? or Jeanette?) who had a cat on Ovarid, or something like that.
Of course, it's NOT for the general feline population, and not
prescribed for any kind of groove-getting.

Sherry
KellyH - 20 May 2005 04:14 GMT
> Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
> healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
> (Patch? or Jeanette?) who had a cat on Ovarid, or something like that.
> Of course, it's NOT for the general feline population, and not
> prescribed for any kind of groove-getting.

I don't know.  I just didn't want to get into that whole stupid argument
again about not spay/neutering so cats can still have sex and bring that
nutjob back on here.

Signature

-Kelly

sriddles@aol.com - 20 May 2005 04:21 GMT
> > Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
> > healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> -Kelly

Gotcha, but WHICH nutjob? There are so many these days it's hard to
keep track.

Sherry
KellyH - 20 May 2005 04:28 GMT
> Gotcha, but WHICH nutjob? There are so many these days it's hard to
> keep track.

I can't remember her name, but she was a real fruitcake.  Kept going on and
on about doing vasectomies and hysterectomies on cats so they could still
"enjoy" sex.

Signature

-Kelly

Diane - 20 May 2005 04:28 GMT
> > Gotcha, but WHICH nutjob? There are so many these days it's hard to
> > keep track.
>
> I can't remember her name, but she was a real fruitcake.  Kept going on and
> on about doing vasectomies and hysterectomies on cats so they could still
> "enjoy" sex.

Oh, yeah, the one who didn't know what a hysterectomy was.

Shhhhh . . .

Signature

http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/index.php

Mary - 20 May 2005 04:46 GMT
> > Gotcha, but WHICH nutjob? There are so many these days it's hard to
> > keep track.
>
> I can't remember her name, but she was a real fruitcake.  Kept going on and
> on about doing vasectomies and hysterectomies on cats so they could still
> "enjoy" sex.

It was the one calling herself Margaret Sanger. There is likely still a web
site called margaretsanger.com where she pontificates.
Cheryl - 20 May 2005 21:30 GMT
On Thu 19 May 2005 11:21:59p,  wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav
(news:1116559319.141815.204090@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com):

>> > Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who
>> > are not healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Sherry

LOL! Too true.

Does this ring a bell? ;)
http://www.mating-without-pregnancy.com/

Signature

Cheryl

"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with
baited breath." - W.C. Fields

bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 04:26 GMT
> > Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
> > healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> -Kelly

FTR

I'm not against surgery to prevent over population.

I could care less if two cats get it on...what do I care.

I said "get groove on"...because that is reality ladies...

CATS HUMP wether we like or not. It's a fact. That's all.

I am not pro cat pleasure pro se.
KellyH - 20 May 2005 04:33 GMT
> FTR
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I am not pro cat pleasure pro se.

OK, well, the most efficient way to keep the population down is to spay and
neuter as many cats as possible.  I don't think giving a cat birth control
is a great idea.  There are many other health benefits to spaying besides
preventing pregnancies.  Namely, prevention of pyometria, and ovarian and
breast cancer.

Signature

-Kelly

bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 04:34 GMT
> OK, well, the most efficient way to keep the population down is to spay and
> neuter as many cats as possible.  I don't think giving a cat birth control
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> -Kelly

I hear ya, I'm a little overwhelmed I have come to realize this is an
ongoing pursuit with seemingly no light at the end of the tunnel.

I am rich in abstract thought, so I think, let's solve the whole thing
in one fell swoop...lol, not going to happen. Im a dreamer.
Phil P. - 20 May 2005 15:31 GMT
> > Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
> > healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
> > (Patch? or Jeanette?) who had a cat on Ovarid, or something like that.
> > Of course, it's NOT for the general feline population, and not
> > prescribed for any kind of groove-getting.

Ovarid-Ovaban- same stuff- megestrol acetate.  It only suppresses or
postpones estrus in queens- doesn't sterilize them. Very nasty adverse
effects (profound adrenocortical suppression, diabetes, endometritis, CEH,
mammary hypertrophy and neoplasias, to name a few).

A few other chemicals have been tried but none produced permanent sterility
without serious adverse effects.

There's an experimental recombinant GnRH vaccine still in the testing stages
that seems to show some promise- but its still to early to say or even guess
how effective it would be in controlling the general feline population. Its
supposed to work in any mammal but might require more than one injection to
achieve sterility. I think they achieved 12 weeks in dogs and about 20
months in cats.

For an immunocontraception agent to be practical for the general feline
population, it must produce permanent sterility after a single dose and also
eliminate the deleterious effects of gonadotropin hormones without producing
serious adverse effects. Quite a trick.

> I don't know.  I just didn't want to get into that whole stupid argument
> again about not spay/neutering so cats can still have sex and bring that
> nutjob back on here.

Oh yeah, I remember her.  Believe it or not, I actually felt a little sorry
for her.  She really cared about cats but just didn't understand their
physiology and didn't want to hear how dangerous her 'alternatives' to
neutering actually are.  Sometimes, cat lovers are more dangerous to cats
than cat haters!

Phil
-L. - 20 May 2005 06:17 GMT
> Isn't there a birth control pill specifically for cats who are not
> healthy enough to spay? It seems like I recall an English poster
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Sherry

Yeah.  Ovarid is mostly used by breeders to control a breeding Queen's
cycle.  Long-term use can lead to pyometra.  It's basically
estrogen-based.  Delvosterone is also used but it sometimes causes
menopause.  They also use Ovadrid for other hormone issues in neutered
males and females.

-L.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 20 May 2005 04:57 GMT
>I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
>the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
>having to worry about the population.
>
>This could work for a pet, I realize a homeless cat would miss too many
>pills.

An intact male would probably do a lot of spraying in the house plus
there are health downsides for intact males.

-mhd
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 05:50 GMT
> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> >the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> -mhd

pill is for female
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 20 May 2005 19:26 GMT
>> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control
>for
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>pill is for female

Then how are they going to "get thier <sic> groove on"?

-mhd
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 05:50 GMT
> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> >the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> -mhd

i reckon this is not a good idea as far as mass birth control
Mary - 20 May 2005 16:57 GMT
> > >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control
> for
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> i reckon this is not a good idea as far as mass birth control

I agree. Also, Phil P. says that sex is just painful for
female cats because the males have spiny penises.
Ashley - 20 May 2005 09:41 GMT
>I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
> having to worry about the population.
>
> This could work for a pet, I realize a homeless cat would miss too many
> pills.

You're anthropomorphising. You can't imagine what it would be like not to
have a sex drive, so you assume it must be a bad thing, and you visit that
belief upon animals.

Animals don't miss what they don't want.
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 10:27 GMT
It's the lesser of two evils.

> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> > the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Animals don't miss what they don't want.
Ashley - 20 May 2005 12:19 GMT
> It's the lesser of two evils.

Anthropomorphising again.
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 12:42 GMT
> > It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Anthropomorphising again.

am not
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 12:59 GMT
> > It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Anthropomorphising again.

ok, so I am anthropomorphising

Now that we're in agreement on that, why do you say we should not spay or
neuter pets.
In light of the conseqeunces...

are you standing up for their pleasures? now who is anthropomorphiser?

it's ok lollipop there's a little bit of hypocrite in all of us.
Ashley - 20 May 2005 22:14 GMT
>> > It's the lesser of two evils.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Now that we're in agreement on that, why do you say we should not spay or
> neuter pets.

I'm not.
bigbadbarry - 21 May 2005 02:13 GMT
> >> > It's the lesser of two evils.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I'm not.

whuh are too!!! how in the world do you know what a cat wants or not

it's all instinct...you are anthropomorphising
Mary - 20 May 2005 17:27 GMT
> > It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Anthropomorphising again.

You have, like, three songs. Next you will talk about how
cats should be outside and about how there is no cat abuse in NZ. Let's hear
Assley's greatest hits!
Philip - 20 May 2005 10:38 GMT
>> I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control
>> for the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Animals don't miss what they don't want.

VERY well stated.
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 10:45 GMT
> >I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control for
> > the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on without us
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Animals don't miss what they don't want.

I don't think any of them see it as pleasure, or feel depraved if they do
not have pleasure.
This is silly thinking at best...

WHO ARE WE FOOLIN' there are kittens everywhere! (homeless ones too) Am I
missing something?

Humans are left to clean up the mess all these studs are leaving behind.
Getting a woman pregnant and leaving her with the children is not cool.

Ok, I'll stand for cat humping, after you have emptied one city of it's
homeless cats.

Be an idealist, but be realistic about reaching the ideals.
Ashley - 20 May 2005 12:19 GMT
> Be an idealist, but be realistic about reaching the ideals.

Mindless sex is not one of my ideals. And those who have no drive don't miss
it.
bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 13:11 GMT
> > Be an idealist, but be realistic about reaching the ideals.
>
> Mindless sex is not one of my ideals. And those who have no drive don't miss
> it.

I stand corrected, I thought you was anti-neutererererer

but then, you misread my meaning, closed the door and left me blinded by the
light
whipped out big a.s word and kicked my butt. haaaaaaa!

but...that's my fualt too...i did say, getting groove on.

here's what i posted above.

"FTR

I'm not against surgery to prevent over population.

I could care less if two cats get it on...what do I care.

I said "get groove on"...because that is reality ladies...

CATS HUMP wether we like or not. It's a fact. That's all.

I am not pro cat pleasure pro se."

oh well..still no solution does my mind find.
Monique Y. Mudama - 20 May 2005 18:01 GMT
> I wonder if there are alternatives to neuturing, like birth control
> for the females cats. Then the males could get thier groove on
> without us having to worry about the population.
>
> This could work for a pet, I realize a homeless cat would miss too
> many pills.

I don't get the reasoning here.  Why would giving cats pills be better
than the surgery?

Human birth control pills need to be taken at the same time every day to
be effective.  Stats seem to show that people have a hard enough time
doing this, and they at least don't fight, spit out pills, etc.

The morning after pill, as I understand it, is a massive dose of
hormone.  It causes vomiting, among other things.  And you have to
take it within a very tight timeframe (hence the name), so you'd
somehow have to know your female cat has had sex recently.

There's a three-month injection called Depo, but it has more side
effects than the daily pill.

Soooo ... whether you're joking or not, this just seems like a bad
idea all around.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Diane - 20 May 2005 18:09 GMT
> Stats seem to show that people have a hard enough time
> doing this, and they at least don't fight, spit out pills, etc.

Oh? How do you know this? ;) :D

Signature

http://www.slywy.com/
Message board: http://www.slywy.com/phpBB2/index.php

Monique Y. Mudama - 20 May 2005 21:14 GMT
>> Stats seem to show that people have a hard enough time doing this,
>> and they at least don't fight, spit out pills, etc.
>
> Oh? How do you know this? ;) :D

Hah!

Okay, *I* never fought myself or spat out my pill.  YMMV.

Signature

monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully

pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

bigbadbarry - 20 May 2005 20:09 GMT
"Monique Y. Mudama" <spam@bounceswoosh.org> wrote in message
> Soooo ... whether you're joking or not, this just seems like a bad
> idea all around.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca

Well, it's my fault for dropping the soap.

wuh? who? put some windex on it!

aaahhh

To tell the truth, when I made the post, I was day dreaming about a pill,
that would perform the sugery chemically. Instant sterility! painless, and
permanent.

But as we all know!  The world is flat.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.