My local news just had a story that has been discussed here before -
multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan them all.
The story recommends that you find out -before you chip- which
manufacturers scanners are in use at your local shelters and vets.
They also say that if your pet has a newer chip and your local
shelters and vets don't have a scanner that detects it, call the
manufacturer and have them send a scanner free of charge to these
facilities. Interesting, but I wonder if it'll happen just by making
a phone call. Now I wonder - is it a good idea to have more than one
manufacturers chip implanted? Would it be potentially harmful to do
so?

Signature
Cheryl
"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with baited
breath."
- W.C. Fields
jmc - 13 May 2005 17:15 GMT
Suddenly, without warning, Cheryl exclaimed (5/13/2005 3:38 AM):
> My local news just had a story that has been discussed here before -
> multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan them all.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> manufacturers chip implanted? Would it be potentially harmful to do
> so?
Probably not necessary. Just do your research and get one of the common
chips. I think Meep's is called Avid (was implanted here in the UK),
but at any rate she's had it since 1999, in three different countries
(including the US), been wanded dozens of times, and it's been
compatible with all of them. About once a year I'll have the vet check
and make sure her chip is still broadcasting.
jmc
Cheryl - 14 May 2005 00:52 GMT
> Suddenly, without warning, Cheryl exclaimed (5/13/2005 3:38 AM):
>> My local news just had a story that has been discussed here
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> jmc
Good suggestion. Then if you move to a different area, and other
scanners are in use there, maybe it would be wise to have another
chip put in. I dunno. I haven't chipped any of my cats because they
stay indoors. I want to be prepared if they ever get out, and have
been thinking about having this done for all 4 of my furkids.

Signature
Cheryl
"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with baited
breath."
- W.C. Fields
sriddles@aol.com - 14 May 2005 01:31 GMT
> My local news just had a story that has been discussed here before -
> multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan them all.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> manufacturer and have them send a scanner free of charge to these
> facilities. Interesting, but I wonder if it'll happen just by making
> a phone call. Now I wonder - is it a good idea to have more than one
> manufacturers chip implanted? Would it be potentially harmful to do
> so?
>
> --
> Cheryl
That's a good question, Cheryl. Good tip about advising shelters of new
scanner manufacturers, too. One thing we have come up against is
finding pets who are actually chipped, only to find out that the people
have since moved and didn't update their info. with the scanner people.
It makes the chip virtually useless unless the shelter can do some
detective work and find out where you moved.
Sherry
Cheryl - 14 May 2005 02:03 GMT
On Fri 13 May 2005 08:31:40p, wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav
(news:1116030700.562114.167350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com):
>> My local news just had a story that has been discussed here
>> before - multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> useless unless the shelter can do some detective work and find
> out where you moved. Sherry
When I was volunteering for the local SPCA here, part of my duties
was to create a database with the AVID chip numbers and reference
the cat it was installed in. I'm not sure if the adopters were ever
informed to update AVID with new home info or not! AFAIK, AVID only
had the local SPCA on file. Unfortunately, the record keeping of
our SPCA was very very bad. I know that I found dups of AVID
numbers, adoption contracts with multiple AVID records, and then
there were times I was given AVID numbers without adoption
contracts attached. I imagine that even within the rescue
organization some cats had more than one chip in them. You can see
some of the reasons I stopped volunteering for them. There are many
more; you know about them, too. :(

Signature
Cheryl
"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with baited
breath."
- W.C. Fields
Tim Hogard - 14 May 2005 01:31 GMT
: My local news just had a story that has been discussed here before -
: multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan them all.
That sounds like a press release that turned into a news story.
There are only a few compaines that make the real chips and there
are international standards for animal tags. What ends up happening
is that some other company will package the tags for the vets and
then sell them 1000 tags with a free scanner or some other promotion.
The free scaners may only detect some tags where if the vet buys a
scanner thats not part of some promotion, it should read allmost any
tag ever made.
In Australia, 1000 tags cost the vet about $10 with the free scanner.
You can buy a scanner for $1000 and the tags for about $3 each in
small numbers. One way is a bargin at $10,000 and the other is
better for everyone ('cept the chip reseller) at $4,000.
I expect that generic chip readers will fall to about $300 in the
next year.
-tim
http://web.abnormal.com
Cheryl - 14 May 2005 01:56 GMT
>: My local news just had a story that has been discussed here
>: before - multiple microchip technology; scanners can't scan
>: them all.
> That sounds like a press release that turned into a news story.
The news I watch does "animal interest" stories very regularly. The
story was sad; not a press release, but a true story about someone
who had their dog chipped and there was an unhappy ending. I'm not
going into details because it makes me cry. The bottom line was
that it was a warning that just because you have your pet chipped
doesn't mean that it will save them.
> There are only a few compaines that make the real chips and
> there are international standards for animal tags. What ends up
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I expect that generic chip readers will fall to about $300 in
> the next year.
I hope so. I haven't heard about any generic chip readers yet. For
the time being, I'm going to find out what the common chip reader
is here in my area and have that brand chip inserted. Unless I find
out there really are generic readers in use here. It doesn't seem
that there are.

Signature
Cheryl
"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with baited
breath."
- W.C. Fields
KellyH - 14 May 2005 05:56 GMT
> The news I watch does "animal interest" stories very regularly. The
> story was sad; not a press release, but a true story about someone
> who had their dog chipped and there was an unhappy ending. I'm not
> going into details because it makes me cry. The bottom line was
> that it was a warning that just because you have your pet chipped
> doesn't mean that it will save them.
There's always the human factor, too. We got two dogs from a neighboring
town into our shelter. They had been held by the ACO for 7 days and were
not claimed, so he transferred them to our shelter. The dogs were scanned
on intake, and a chip was found. The owners were called and were at the
shelter within the hour. The other town ACO was just plain lazy and hadn't
bothered to scan the dogs. At least this story had a happy ending.

Signature
-Kelly