Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ear Cleaners

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brandy?Alexandre - 29 Mar 2005 20:18 GMT
Interesting note that will probably start a fight, I wondered if Kami's
selective deafness might be due to wax build-up.  I couldn't really see
anything, but thought "couldn't hurt."  There were three or four
different preparations labeled for both cats and dogs with different
ingredients.  I opted for the "carbamide peroxide in a stable glycerin
solution," but I have to say that one of the other had propylene glycol
in it.  

Kami wasn't too keen on the procedure and I wound up wearing quite a
bit of the stuff I purchased.  She got more all over herself than I
would have hoped, and I cleaned her up as much as I could and let her
do the rest with no ill effects.  Made me think about her grooming
after using one of the other solutions.  Hmmm...

Anyway, ears look clean as a whistle.

Signature

Brandy??Alexandre?
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?

John Doe - 29 Mar 2005 21:07 GMT
> Interesting note that will probably start a fight, I wondered if
> Kami's selective deafness might be due to wax build-up.  I
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Anyway, ears look clean as a whistle.

I don't know if cat's ear tissue is as delicate or more delicate
than human ear tissue. I would suggest being careful because the
skin inside of an ear is more delicate and can be damaged more
easily. That might not have to do with your procedure, just
general information.

Sometimes I put thumb and middle finger around the outside base of
Kiki's ear and gently massage it.

Good luck.
Joe Canuck - 29 Mar 2005 21:50 GMT
Brandy Alexandre wrote:

> Interesting note that will probably start a fight

That is called trolling.
Phil P. - 30 Mar 2005 06:17 GMT
> Brandy Alexandre wrote:
>
> > Interesting note that will probably start a fight
>
> That is called trolling.

That's because the low-life has nothing important to say....
Cheryl - 29 Mar 2005 23:44 GMT
> Anyway, ears look clean as a whistle.

Good work. Just an anecdotal story, but when Shadow was alive, he had
the worst gunky ears. Other than the IBD, his ears were the next top
reason he had to go to the vet because sometimes the gunk would ooze
out. He even had polyps that needed removing once. One of the
supplements I regularly gave him was B complex. Again, anecdotal, but
once he was on a regular dose of it, his ears never bothered him
again.

Signature

Cheryl

"The clever cat eats cheese and breathes down rat holes with baited
breath."
- W.C. Fields

Brandy?Alexandre - 29 Mar 2005 23:56 GMT
Cheryl <jlhshadow@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in
rec.pets.cats.health+behav:

>> Anyway, ears look clean as a whistle.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> anecdotal, but once he was on a regular dose of it, his ears never
> bothered him again.

Well, part of this was about possible dirty ears being cause for
"deafness," and the other was about one of the product containing PG
and considering how much Kami had to clean off herself.  I found it
interesting that a product labeled for cats that would have much
more ingestable PG as a result of using it than a baby wipe *would*
actually be labeled for cats.  I would like to see a definitive
study from a real vet (not a wannabe) that indicates at what point
it becomes toxic.  Like the one I finally found about onions that
made this group sound like Henny Penny.  ;)

But in the end, ears are clean, still thinking deafness is
selective.  

Signature

Brandy??Alexandre?
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?

Phil P. - 30 Mar 2005 06:16 GMT
"Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message

I found it
> interesting that a product labeled for cats that would have much
> more ingestable PG as a result of using it than a baby wipe *would*
> actually be labeled for cats.

Doesn't take much to interest you... unless it has a hole in the tip...

I would like to see a definitive
> study from a real vet (not a wannabe) that indicates at what point
> it becomes toxic.

Try shoving a gallon jug of it up your a.s  and find out -- it would fit
without even touching touching the rim.

Like the one I finally found about onions that
> made this group sound like Henny Penny.  ;)

You didn't find anything.  You only made yourself look like the walking
a.shole that you are.

> But in the end, ears are clean, still thinking deafness is
> selective.

Yeah, you're cat probably doesn't want to hear your bullshit either.

Stick to dicks and leave the pussy cats alone.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.