Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

disposing of stray cats?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Doe - 21 Mar 2005 23:43 GMT
Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
a sick or injured cat in your neighborhood. Which in your opinion
would be the lesser of two evils.

... take it to the pound

... take it to your veterinarian and have it put to sleep (killed,
euthanized, whatever)

I realize it's easy for some to say they would take care of it better
than that, but I'm only interested in hearing about what your hard
choice might be. Try really hard, however difficult imagining that
money is an issue (while talking on the Internet).

Thank you.
KellyH - 22 Mar 2005 00:22 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thank you.

Take the cat to the vet.  At least it can be put to sleep in relative peace.
The cat can pass on knowing someone cared.
But, and this is just me, I would have the cat put down if it appeared too
far gone for help.  I am the sort that would use my own money to help a
stray.

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
"Wake up, and smell the cat food" -TMBG

zuzu22@webtv.net - 22 Mar 2005 00:27 GMT
>If you noticed a sick or injured cat in your
>neighborhood. Which in your opinion
>would be the lesser of two evils.
>... take it to the pound
>... take it to your veterinarian and have it
>put to sleep (killed, euthanized, whatever)

I think they're equally bad and IMO neither is worthy of consideration.

You're creating a false dilemma here and I'm not going to respond the
way you want because neither of the "options" you present are ones that
I would ever consider, nor are they the only options. AFAIC the only
option I feel is the right one ethically and morally is to rescue the
cat, treat it, and either adopt it or find it a home.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 22 Mar 2005 01:23 GMT
> >If you noticed a sick or injured cat in your
> >neighborhood. Which in your opinion
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> option I feel is the right one ethically and morally is to rescue the
> cat, treat it, and either adopt it or find it a home.

I agree with you, Megan, 100%.
John Doe - 22 Mar 2005 01:50 GMT
>>If you noticed a sick or injured cat in your
>>neighborhood. Which in your opinion
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> respond the way you want because neither of the "options" you
> present are ones that I would ever consider,

If in your opinion they are unworthy of consideration and you
would never even consider them, then you wouldn't know they are
equally bad.

> AFAIC the only option I feel is the right one
> ethically and morally is to rescue the cat, treat it, and either
> adopt it or find it a home.

I think that's great if in real life you practice what you preach
on the Internet.

> Megan
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Content-Disposition: Inline
> Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:357554
zuzu22@webtv.net - 22 Mar 2005 02:43 GMT
>If in your opinion they are unworthy of
>consideration and you would never even
>consider them, then you wouldn't know
>they are equally bad.

Of course I would. I already know they're equally bad which is why I
don't think they're worthy of consideration as options.

>>AFAIC the only option I feel is the right
>>one ethically and morally is to rescue the
>>cat, treat it, and either adopt it or find it a
>>home.

>I think that's great if in real life you
>practice what you preach on the Internet.

If you have any doubts you're more than welcome to peruse my photo album
and start counting (link below.) :-)

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


-L. - 23 Mar 2005 01:41 GMT
<snip>

> I think that's great if in real life you practice what you preach
> on the Internet.

FWIW, Megan does practice what she preaches.

-L.
Meghan Noecker - 23 Mar 2005 10:25 GMT
>I think that's great if in real life you practice what you preach
>on the Internet.

Many people do. As I mentioned in my last post, my mom and I spent
over $700 and the cat didn't even live. I would do it again.

Granted, I don't go looking for strays. But when I find one, I feel
obligated to see to their future. I can't just hand them over the the
unknown.

I know of another example. A couple moved into a house down our street
and they had two dogs.. One was an old blind sheltie. They were quite
new, so nobody knew they had dogs.

Well, somebody left the gate open and the blind sheltie got out. A
truck stopped and picked up the dog, asked a neighbor if they knew
whose it was, and of course, the neighbor said the only shelties
around were ours. My mom told him it wasn't ours. The next day, signs
went up for a missing sheltie.

My mom remembered the name on the truck - a local business, but it was
saturday and the business was closed. She called the dog's owner and
let them know that the dog had been picked up and a message left on
the business' machine. That night, at dinner with some church friends,
she told the story, and one of the friends knew the last name of the
business owner and said they went to the same church. So, my mom
looked in the directory, found the home phone number, called the
peopel, and went and picked up the dog. Not only had these people
taken great care of the dog, but they had taken her to the vet, had
her nails trimmed, and gotten arthtris medication. Pretty nice for
people who found an old dog on the street.

There are a lot of good people out there that do take in strays and
pay their vet bills. We do practice what we preach.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Mary - 23 Mar 2005 17:29 GMT
> >I think that's great if in real life you practice what you preach
> >on the Internet.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> There are a lot of good people out there that do take in strays and
> pay their vet bills. We do practice what we preach.

Amen. If I came upon an injured stray I would take care
of it one way or another because I would feel compelled
by compassion to do it. I would not feel I had a choice.
If I did not have the ready cash on hand I know I could
talk the vet into payments or donating some of it.
Mel - 23 Mar 2005 20:08 GMT
I agree.  Compassion and kindness can never be doled out in too great a
quantity. Sometimes when I am unsure about a situation, I think "how would I
want to be treated if I were in that position?"  It makes the answer very
clear :)

Just a note, Meghan. I went to bookmark your site for a later checkout and
found the initial horse photo absolutely breathtaking!  With the snow flying
about his/her legs as he cuts a turn, I could only think "wow!" Now I am
looking forward to seeing the rest of the site!

Melody

>> >I think that's great if in real life you practice what you preach
>> >on the Internet.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> If I did not have the ready cash on hand I know I could
> talk the vet into payments or donating some of it.
I.P.Freely - 22 Mar 2005 01:01 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ... take it to your veterinarian and have it put to sleep (killed,
> euthanized, whatever)

I'd do neither. I would probably take it in and feed it, get it sorted and
perhaps find someone who would look after it on a more permanent basis - if
not keep it myself.

..but then I am lucky in that I can afford to do that I suppose.
Signature

I.P.Freely

Anonymity is synonymous with longetivity

John Doe - 22 Mar 2005 01:56 GMT
> "John Doe" <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> wrote in message

>> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical
>> United States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> sorted and perhaps find someone who would look after it on a
> more permanent basis - if not keep it myself.

I should have explained that clearly as one of the well-known
courses of action. Hopefully there won't be a dozen of the same
replies.

I pray the holy will at least be creative and not just redundant.

> ..but then I am lucky in that I can afford to do that I suppose.

Or maybe you live in an area with fewer stray animals.
Spot - 22 Mar 2005 02:45 GMT
For one thing my vet would not put to sleep a cat that I personally did not
own.  Unless the cat were not to recover at all and I showed up with it and
asked to have it put to sleep because it was a stray she would insist that I
take it to the pound first.

I can't see any vet putting to sleep a cat just because someone brings it in
saying it's a stray anyway.

Celeste

> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thank you.
-L. - 23 Mar 2005 01:41 GMT
> For one thing my vet would not put to sleep a cat that I personally did not
> own.  Unless the cat were not to recover at all and I showed up with it and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Celeste

If the cat is suffering, and fatally injured, most vets will.  It
becomes a humane issue.

-L.
sriddles@aol.com - 22 Mar 2005 03:34 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed

> a sick or injured cat in your neighborhood. Which in your opinion
> would be the lesser of two evils.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ... take it to your veterinarian and have it put to sleep (killed,
> euthanized, whatever)

I'm assuming this scenario involves a cat with extensive injuries. If
it just appeared sick, or was limping or such, I'd take it to the vet
and end up keeping it or homing it.
The only times I've been faced with that decision was once with a cat I
picked up off a street in the city that had been hit by a car and was
severely injured. I took it to the first vet office I could find, and
asked for the best euthanasia money could buy. (i.e., to sedate the cat
first as if for surgery, before administering the euthanasia drug) It
cost $65.
Almost the exact same scenario happened later, only it was a dog, and
it was about a mile from my house. I took the dog in to my regular vet,
who euth'ed the dog for free since he knew it wasn't my dog to begin
with.
I think the real question, in the case of a severely injured animal, is
whether or not you've got the stuff to take responsibility for it, and
get vet care immediately, which is the most humane thing to do. Humane
Societies can't be expected to do it all. I don't expect to pass off
responsibility for a cat I can take care of myself.

Sherry
Iain Halder - 22 Mar 2005 04:24 GMT
>Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
>States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Thank you.

I'd get the cat treated if its condition was treatable and then
neutered and aggressively fed and watered.

If money was a problem I'd either scrimp a bit or do the necessary
overtime and use the charity PDSA service rather than a commercial
vets.

Then, if I could not find the cat a home I'd return it to where I
found it. A bit like Trap-Neuter-Return, I suppose. If I did not like
where I found it then I'd take it to the edge of the city where it may
co-exist between country and town.

Of course, I say this in Internet text but (in reality) I'd take the
animal in and home it for the rest of his/her days. If the cat is
truly feral then this is where the fun would really begin!!!

Actually John, you are just presenting your two fixed choices, kind of
black & white. In reality there is plenty of gray in the between and
my 'hard choice' would always be to put myself in the cats position
and then work a solution from there.

Iain.H
>o< Rescued Cats & Kittens Needing Homes >o<
       >o< www.celiahammond.org >o<
       >o<   www.cat77.org.uk   >o<
sriddles@aol.com - 22 Mar 2005 16:22 GMT
> I'd get the cat treated if its condition was treatable and then
> neutered and aggressively fed and watered.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> where I found it then I'd take it to the edge of the city where it may
> co-exist between country and town.

I was agreeing with you up until the last graph :-)

The only candidates for TNR are the very feral. Dumping a cat is never
the right thing to do. I'd rather see people euthanize than dump a cat
they've been taking care of back to starve, or fall victim to predators
or traffic. All cats can't hunt well enough to sustain themselves and
there are just too many opportunities for the cat to simply die a
horrible death.

Sherry
Iain Halder - 22 Mar 2005 18:07 GMT
>I was agreeing with you up until the last graph :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Sherry

Yes, you are right there.

I should have clarified the point it would only have been if the cat
had been totally wildly feral and 100% unhomeable. I'm not sure, if
given (long!!!) time and infinite love (and patience!!!) there really
is such a cat.

But as I said, in all reality I would make every effort to home it and
probably never would dump the animal. Probably just responding to the
unrealistic set of fixed choices originally presented by John.

Healthy cats are quite efficient predators in their own right and can
cope quite well in the city border into the countryside. Inner city I
don't estimate their chances as being as good which is why I'd
suggested the out of the city approach.

But in either case, if push comes to shove, I'd rather see the animal
go out with a small chance than no chance at all - which is what
killing it would be. So I am in favour of TNR when the alternatives
are limited.

Iain.H
>o< Rescued Cats & Kittens Needing Homes >o<
       >o< www.celiahammond.org >o<
       >o<   www.cat77.org.uk   >o<
Noon Cat Nick - 22 Mar 2005 06:18 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thank you.

If those were my *only* possible choices--that all other choices would
be impossible to carry out--I'd rather have the vet put the poor
creature down, allowing it to be put at peace humanely and mercifully
and at least being comforted in its last moments in the presence of
caring persons, than to take it to the pound and risk compounding its
agony with fear, loneliness, and absence of compassion.
BarB - 22 Mar 2005 18:40 GMT
>Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
>States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>... take it to your veterinarian and have it put to sleep (killed,
>euthanized, whatever)

If it goes to the pound it will be euthanized period.
Take it to a vet and let him/her make the decision as to whether
the cat can be saved. If it is too sick to survive, the vet will put
it to sleep gently. I wouldn't want to be the one to make that
decision without expert advice.

BarB
Kalyahna - 23 Mar 2005 05:07 GMT
> >Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> >States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> BarB

Perhaps at a "pound." Most shelters have working relationships
with vets in the area, even if they don't have a veterinarian on staff.
We're lucky enough to have both.

And really... no one works harder at saving the cats in our shelter
than the medical staff. Our staff may decide that euthanasia is the
most humane option, but to say outright that it WILL be euthanized
is simply assinine.
-L. - 23 Mar 2005 01:40 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed

> a sick or injured cat in your neighborhood. Which in your opinion
> would be the lesser of two evils.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ... take it to your veterinarian and have it put to sleep (killed,
> euthanized, whatever)

C.)  Take it to your local private animal shelter (Humane Society,
etc., not city run) whether or not they are a "kill" shelter.  At least
at an HS or similar, if it is an owned cat, it can usually be claimed.

-L.
Kalyahna - 23 Mar 2005 05:00 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> choice might be. Try really hard, however difficult imagining that
> money is an issue (while talking on the Internet).

Considering the emergency vet is about a half mile away and I have
their number in my cellphone? Well. Do the math.

For an injured stray, they treat it and send it to the shelter anyway
when it's stable.
Meghan Noecker - 23 Mar 2005 10:18 GMT
>Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
>States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>choice might be. Try really hard, however difficult imagining that
>money is an issue (while talking on the Internet).

If it was sick or injured  - vet.

As it is, 4 years ago, my mom fund a cat by the side of the road. His
jaw was broken. Eye injured, very bloody. She took him to the nearest
vet (and spendy). She really liked him, and her description of his
temperment hooked me. We paid the $700 for his treatment and brought
him home. He was severely underweight, and while his injuried
improved, he did die after 2 1/2 weeks.

I still believe we did the right thing. He had a much better 2 1/2
weeks with us and reall love and attention than he would have gotten
at the pound or just being left at the vet to die.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Phil P. - 23 Mar 2005 21:50 GMT
> Getting right to the point. In the context of the typical United
> States big-city which runs a kill type animal shelter. If you noticed
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> than that, but I'm only interested in hearing about what your hard
> choice might be.

IOW, you want to know if I would chose death or death.  Your choices are
asinine.
Melody - 25 Mar 2005 01:25 GMT
As my aunt and Godmother always said "Everyone is entitled to their own ridiculous opinion."  Their choices are asinine in your opinion only.  That does not make them asinine.

> IOW, you want to know if I would chose death or death.  Your choices are
> asinine.
Phil P. - 25 Mar 2005 03:05 GMT
>As my aunt and Godmother always said "Everyone is entitled to their own ridiculous opinion."  Their choices are asinine in your opinion only.  That
>does not make them asinine.

You're right.. Death or death are perfectly reasonable choices.... Okey
dokey.

> IOW, you want to know if I would chose death or death.  Your choices are
> asinine.
Mel - 25 Mar 2005 08:04 GMT
Oops, sorry, response was to wrong post Phil ! *red face*

M.

>>As my aunt and Godmother always said "Everyone is entitled to their own
> ridiculous opinion."  Their choices are asinine in your opinion only.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> IOW, you want to know if I would chose death or death.  Your choices are
>> asinine.
Phil P. - 25 Mar 2005 16:52 GMT
> Oops, sorry, response was to wrong post Phil ! *red face*

No problem.
Steve G - 25 Mar 2005 01:33 GMT
(...)

> IOW, you want to know if I would chose death or death.  Your choices are
> asinine.

Oh, it could be worse. He could be this guy...

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=308461

I think it's worth bearing in mind that this part of Usenet ain't
representative of some of the realities out there...

S.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.