Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2005
Other alternatives to Hills prescription s/d?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Phil - 10 Mar 2005 01:15 GMT Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills prescription s/d was recommended. We have both cans and dry food of this variety. Here is our problem. We have two other adult cats besides Ripley, our surgery kitty. Can all three cats eat this s/d on a daily basis? Our vet seemed to indicate that they could, but that leads to our second problem. *None* of the cats (Ripley included) will eat the canned s/d. They will not even be so much as in the same room with this food. They all will more or less pick at the dry s/d, but I fear they will never change their attitudes toward the canned. One of these cats is a senior and on the thin side so I don't need him going on any kind of hunger strike. It would also be extremely difficult to feed them seperately. So is there another more commercially made canned cat food that would have a similar formula to the s/d but that they might all find a bit more to their liking? I'm not talking necessarily about a cheap supermarket brand. We have several pet shops that carry a wide variety of more 'natural' type brands.
Any other suggestions to help this kitty with her life of hopefully remaining bladder stone free?
Thanks,
Phil
Karen - 10 Mar 2005 01:40 GMT > Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones > or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Phil I know there are at least two other versions. One by Eukanuba, one by Walthams, oh and I think there is one by IVD. All available through vets. Maybe your vet could arrange a sampling of each?
Phil - 10 Mar 2005 01:54 GMT > > Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones > > or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Walthams, oh and I think there is one by IVD. All available through vets. > Maybe your vet could arrange a sampling of each? Thanks, I'll inquire about those.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 03:08 GMT An easy alternative to feeding an acidified prescription food is to feed *canned* Wellness brand cat food and have the vet prescribe Methioform tabs, which is a urinary acidifier in pill form. Wellness promotes a urine ph very similar to Science Diet c/d and the Methioform tabs will send the ph into the more acid range which is what s/d would do. It would not be wise to feed the other cats the precription diet as it is designed to dissolve struvite crystals and would be too acid for a healthy cat, putting them at risk for developing calcium oxalate crystals or stones. All your cats could eat the Wellness with the one cat getting the Methioform tablets (which a lot of cats really like the taste of.) The main flavors I feed my own cats are chicken, turkey, chicken and herring, and turkey and salmon. For future reference, feeding scheduled meals of a high quality canned diet and eliminating dry food will help avoid situations such as the one you're dealing with. HTH.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 03:29 GMT Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much more complicated than that.
Cheryl - 10 Mar 2005 03:39 GMT > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. > The suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary > acidifiers is just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only > issue here, it is much more complicated than that. Please elaborate for us Steve.
 Signature Cheryl
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:19 GMT Feline Lower urinary tract disease is substantially more than just urine pH. Magnesium levels, potassium levels, calcium levels, sodium levels and a number of biological factors must be taken into account.
Pet foods designed for struvite dissolution or struvite maintenace almost always are subject to much more critical testing than just urine pH. Hill's prefers to use a system called APR - activity product ratio. You can google on this and learn more about it if your wish. Basically this tests ALL the factors involved, including biological and determines if a given nutrient profile will acheive the goal. Waltham / Royal Canin uses what they call the RSS - Risk Super Saturation - it's similar test process, but done in vitro. I am not sure what Purina does nor Eukanuba. Neither promote thier food for struvite dissolution, only for stuvite maintenace. They haven't ever published anything relative to the process they choose to use. Leo over in Europe uses RSS as well.
Where ZUZU always goes wrong is she allows her undisguised hatred for Hill's to interfere with her logic. It's an emotional decision and not one established in any science or logical facts. Wellness has never published ANY testing of any kind to insure that struvite dissolution will ocurr with thier diet with added methioform or any other urinary acidifier. Wellness can't even tell you what the mean urine pH range will be of the various diets they produce and why on earth should they? - they are not in the business of creating theerapeutic diets. They create diets for healthy kitties.
Like usual ZUZU likes to stick with third grade math level of analyzing diets - just the ingredients and never mind the nutrients. In the case of any animal with a disease condition that is patently dangerous in the extreme. Examples of this cat or that cat that "did well" are completely meaningless. We are talking about the general population of struvite dissolution cats here, not one single cat or even a dozen single cats. The peer reviewed published data covering Hill's and Royal Canin's dissoltuion products is huge - in contrast there isn't a single bit of published data to support Wellness and methioform tabs. Advice like that can send the cat back for another surgery and will ZUZU pay the bill for it? Not likely.
As an interesting note to the whole discussion. You may know that since 1981 Calcium Oxalate stones have grown as a percentage of all stones in a cat. By 1995 CaOx stones overcame struvites as the most common stone. This trend began reversing itself in 2002 and now once again in 2004 there were more struvite stones found that CaOx stones.
1999 33% Struvite, 55% CaOx 2002 40% Struvite, 50% CaOx 2003 42% Struvite, 47% CaOx 2004 45% Struvite, 44% CaOx The missing percentage is taken up by urates, cystines, and assorted other unusual uroliths.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 11 Mar 2005 03:59 GMT <snip expected bullshit>
Nice try at scaring people away from what is working for them. Hopefully they'll see you have a financial interest in everything you post, look at your lies with a critical eye, and ignore the scamming you do.
And BTW, Wellness does tell you the ph range for their foods. Call them and ask. I did.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
gaubster2@comcast.net - 11 Mar 2005 18:48 GMT > <snip expected bullshit> > > Nice try at scaring people away from what is working for them. Hopefully > they'll see you have a financial interest in everything you post, look > at your lies with a critical eye, and ignore the scamming you do. Megan, are you some lonely old spinster w/ a bunch of cats that is so withdrawn from society that you've let you hatred and bitterness consume you?? Your venom is not neccessary here just because someone doesn't agree w/ you!
You are a Hill's Hater and a proponent of OMH Wellness which does exactly ZERO research into small animal clinical nutrition. You're one of those ignorant people who doesn't believe facts and science, you buy into emotion only and when someone doesn't agree with you, or questions you in any way, you attack them. Why?
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 19:12 GMT > > <snip expected bullshit> > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > consume you?? Your venom is not neccessary here just because someone > doesn't agree w/ you! She does do this but ad hominem attacks make you just as bad as she is. She sucks me into this kind of behavior on a regular basis. And she's got Brian Link and others doing the same thing. It may be unavoidable in such a public forum, but it doesn't contribute much to the discussion.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 03:23 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>She sucks me into this kind of behavior >on a regular basis. This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year.
>And she's got Brian Link and others >doing the same thing. Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Cheryl - 12 Mar 2005 03:44 GMT On Fri 11 Mar 2005 10:23:21p, wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav (news:19807-423260A9-529@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net):
> marys@catlover.com wrote: > >>She sucks me into this kind of behavior >>on a regular basis. Oh Irony Meter!!! rofl!!!!!!
> This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year. > >>And she's got Brian Link and others >>doing the same thing. > > Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P I almost wish I could see the entire post but then again... naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa... hehehe I'm sure it was more of the same 'ol same 'ol.
> Megan
 Signature Cheryl
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 03:59 GMT > On Fri 11 Mar 2005 10:23:21p, wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav > (news:19807-423260A9-529@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net): [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Oh Irony Meter!!! rofl!!!!!! Oh, yes! Kind of like how you lied and said you didn't hang in the troll groups and slurp Big Bad Buzzard right before he admitted you did! Oh the Irony. Oh, wait. That's not right. That is just one example of your lying your sorry a.s off. lol!
> > This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year. > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa... hehehe I'm sure it was more of the same 'ol > same 'ol. It is indeed. How could it be otherwise, as long as you are a liar and a hypocrite, and that isn't going to change. :)
Cheryl - 12 Mar 2005 04:34 GMT >> > marys@catlover.com wrote: >> > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Irony. Oh, wait. That's not right. That is just one > example of your lying your sorry a.s off. lol! FFS you stupid woman, learn to comprehend. I never denied being a reg at AHM at all. Never. I denied trolling other groups like you accused me of. "Invasion" I think you called it. I was in AHM to learn. I posted to the whole "world" my intentions there and here.
"Sucking you in" to bad behavior my a.s. I read that at work today where you *aren't* KF'd as you are in my Xnews *note posting from OE just to refute your demonization of me YET AGAIN* and I just laughed my a.s off!!! Your behavior here has been nothing but nasty, miserable, wretched and just plain mean from the start. For some reason you seem to be reinventing yourself lately. The only sucking you do is to newcomers and a select old regs and try to make yourself look like a decent human being. Many of us know the real "Mary" and who "Mary" wanted everyone to think she was. A big bad tough bitch that no one should disagree with.
How many other identities have you had? Hmm? marys@catlovernospam.com (lets not forget the other variance of this you still use occassionally that I had to KF for a second time, marys@catlover.com, and previously crazyaboutfelines@yahoo.com and before that rosefan@email.com
Google speaks volumes. And as for you continuously posting my former email address of jlh@petitmorte.net over and over again ad nauseam, I haven't used that address in years and am hiding nothing. I don't have that email address anymore. . Go ahead and keep "demonizing" me all you want. I really don't give a sh.t. You're proving nothing and you're not hurting me in the least.
FOAD bitch.
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 17:09 GMT > >> > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > me of. "Invasion" I think you called it. I was in AHM to learn. I > posted to the whole "world" my intentions there and here. Oh, right. Your boss "assigned" you the task of learning to hack. That's right. Told you to post in the troll groups with your good bud Buzzard and his illustrious buds. You're still posting in alt.buzzard.rules, did your boss "assign" that too? I am laughing at you, you lying sack of cat poo. Wahahahahaha!
> "Sucking you in" to bad behavior my a.s. I read that at work today > where you *aren't* KF'd as you are in my Xnews *note posting from OE [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > who "Mary" wanted everyone to think she was. A big bad tough bitch > that no one should disagree with. Sure you should! I have never tried to censor anyone. As for the rest, I am what I am. Nasty at times, etc. etc. The difference between us is that I am not posting to Usenet in some pathetic attempt to find "friends" as you do. Just having my say. You and Lynnie and Megan are the types of Kooks who have so little in your personal life that you have to make Usenet some sort of social device. It's just a means of communication.
> How many other identities have you had? Hmm? > marys@catlovernospam.com (lets not forget the other variance of this > you still use occassionally that I had to KF for a second time, > marys@catlover.com, and previously crazyaboutfelines@yahoo.com and > before that rosefan@email.com Pssst .... if I wanted to have "different identities" I would have changed my NAME when I changed emails, fuckface. I change emails whenever it suits me, but always use the same name and have announced it when I changed emails so that pussies like you can KEEP me in your killfile. Damned polite of me.
> Google speaks volumes. And as for you continuously posting my former > email address of jlh@petitmorte.net over and over again ad nauseam, I > haven't used that address in years and am hiding nothing. I don't have > that email address anymore. . Go ahead and keep "demonizing" me all > you want. I really don't give a sh.t. You're proving nothing and > you're not hurting me in the least. Cheryl: everyone who reads the group SAW you post about Googling me to "find out who I really am" for months. Although I knew you from years ago, I said nothing about your trolling buddies. I finally mentioned it because the irony was killing me. All anyone needs to to is Google jlh@petitmorte.net to see what you were doing, or to go to alt.buzzard.rules to see you playing there this month. Google the Google queen, and find out that she has much more to hide than you do. It's funny. Damned funny. You just got "spanked," Trollette. Ain't no thang. It's only Usenet.
> FOAD bitch. Thanks for these good wishes. Not just yet, though.
-L. - 12 Mar 2005 20:10 GMT <snip>
> I really don't give a sh.t. You're proving nothing and > you're not hurting me in the least. She must be in heat again. She's humping everyone's posts again. Either that or she forgot her meds.
-L.
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:36 GMT > <snip> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > -L. That's it. I am in heat. You so smart. But no meds, Lynnie. I am high on life. If I were a fat under-educated socialist married to a pick-up driving loser I met online, now that might call for Xanax.
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 03:56 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P Now that is the funniest thing I have heard all day. Point is, you launch ad hominem attacks because you are not bright enough to advance an effective argument.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 06:08 GMT marys@catlover.com lied:
>Point is, you launch ad hominem attacks >because you are not bright enough to >advance an effective argument. You are truly delusional and have no sense of personal responsibility. You do, however, have quite the talent for hypocrisy.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 16:31 GMT > marys@catlover.com lied: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You are truly delusional and have no sense of personal responsibility. > You do, however, have quite the talent for hypocrisy. Yet another ad hominem attack. That you for proving my point. :) This is what you do every time your bogus recommendations are challenged. It's hilarious.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 18:22 GMT maryscatlover.com wrote:
>Yet another ad hominem attack. No. A response to one of many by you. HTH.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
equalizer - 11 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT >Path: news2.newsguy.com!lana.pathlink.com!lex!rex!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail >From: "gaubster2@comcast.net" <cgaub@comcast.net> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] >into emotion only and when someone doesn't agree with you, or questions >you in any way, you attack them. Why? Hee! Heee! Heee!
"Gaubster", who is really Steve Crane, is posting from 198.179.238.3, which resolves as follows:
OrgName: Hill's Pet Nutrition OrgID: HPN Address: 400 S. W. Eighth City: Topeka StateProv: KS PostalCode: 66603-3945 Country: US
NetRange: 198.179.238.0 - 198.179.238.255 CIDR: 198.179.238.0/24 NetName: HILLSPET NetHandle: NET-198-179-238-0-1 Parent: NET-198-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Assignment Comment: RegDate: 1993-11-18 Updated: 1993-11-18
TechHandle: RAE2-ARIN TechName: Ewing, Roger A. TechPhone: +1-913-231-5340 TechEmail:
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-03-10 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
Weeeeeeeee!!!! Got a bit of a commute from the Portland area, eh Gauby?!??!
Gaubster works for Hill's, Ooooooooo Hooooooo Hooooooo Hooooooooooo!!!!!
This is gonna be FUUUUUUUUUN!!!!!!!!!
Hey Stevie -- I know in the past you've said that everything you say on here is your own opinion, and has nothing to do with your employer!! Are you gonna take the heat on here publicly, or are we gonna put it to your employer with the fact that you're using their infrastructure to post your venomous diatribes on here to promote Hill's products using what can only be described as pure, undiluted SLEAZE?!?
eq
Magic Mood Jeep? - 12 Mar 2005 00:32 GMT >> Path: >> news2.newsguy.com!lana.pathlink.com!lex!rex!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail [quoted text clipped - 94 lines] > > eq *BUT* Steve's first posting is as such
Path: attbi_s52!attbi_slave61!attbi_slave12!attbi_master11!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!199.218.7.141!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Steve Crane" <eodemolay@cox.net> Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Subject: Re: Other alternatives to Hills prescription s/d? Date: 9 Mar 2005 19:29:44 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 5 Message-ID: <1110425384.186032.136800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> References: <LcNXd.8545$603.1123@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> <19807-422FBA13-209@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.78 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1110425388 16748 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2005 03:29:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <19807-422FBA13-209@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net> User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Note the NNTP of 66.82.9.78, which comes back to Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE RegDate: 2001-02-28 Updated: 2003-01-21
TechHandle: ZD63-ARIN TechName: DirecPC TechPhone: +1-301-601-7205 TechEmail: abuse@direcpc.com
OrgTechHandle: NSM5-ARIN OrgTechName: Network Security Manager OrgTechPhone: +1-301-601-7205 OrgTechEmail: abuse@direcpc.com
ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-03-10 19:10 Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
Registrant: Hughes Network Systems (RNIEBDWYID) 11717 Exploration Lane Germantown, MD 20876 US
Domain Name: DIRECPC.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact: Hughes Network Systems (35808819O) hostmaster@hns.com 11717 Exploration Lane Germantown, MD 20876 US 3016017224
Record expires on 07-Jun-2005. Record created on 23-Aug-2003. Database last updated on 11-Mar-2005 19:29:13 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS.DIRECPC.COM 198.77.116.8 NS.CAIS.COM 205.177.10.10
Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion --? The ONE and ONLY lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)? email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
equalizer - 12 Mar 2005 00:51 GMT On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©" <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
<SNIP>
>*BUT* Steve's first posting is as such > [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] >Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion >--? No confusion to it! He's posting from multiple sources. If I were to use a dial up connection that showed my IP (I'm currently using Comcast), I'd show a different IP than the one that would show from the source I'm using now if I chose to let it show. Think of it this way -- In the instance I'm pointing out, I've shown that "Steve Crane" and "Gaubster" posted today on here from the same "telephone number". It showed on the "caller ID". "Gaubster" and "Steve Crane" have posted from multiple sources in the past. Today, "they" screwed up and "appeared in the same room together". Unfortunately, we're not dealing with a Superman and Clark Kent this time, just a money hungry little company mouthpiece.
eq
>The ONE and ONLY >lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy >former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)© >email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com >http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep __ Info from these "two" posters headers:
Steve Crane:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
Gaubster:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
PawsForThought - 12 Mar 2005 05:38 GMT EQ so eloquently wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©" > <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > eq Seems Steve Crane and "Gaubster" use the same newsreader too - G2/0.2 For shame, for shame! LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 Signature PawsForThought
equalizer - 12 Mar 2005 10:39 GMT Just a re-post with x-no-archive off. Thanks "John"!
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©" <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
<SNIP>
>*BUT* Steve's first posting is as such > [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] >Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion >--? No confusion to it! He's posting from multiple sources. If I were to use a dial up connection that showed my IP (I'm currently using Comcast), I'd show a different IP than the one that would show from the source I'm using now if I chose to let it show. Think of it this way -- In the instance I'm pointing out, I've shown that "Steve Crane" and "Gaubster" posted today on here from the same "telephone number". It showed on the "caller ID". "Gaubster" and "Steve Crane" have posted from multiple sources in the past. Today, "they" screwed up and "appeared in the same room together". Unfortunately, we're not dealing with a Superman and Clark Kent this time, just a money hungry little company mouthpiece.
eq
>The ONE and ONLY >lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy >former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)© >email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com >http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep __ Info from these "two" posters headers:
Steve Crane:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
Gaubster:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 03:56 GMT > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is > just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much > more complicated than that. Just curious what Phil has to say.
Phil P. - 11 Mar 2005 20:18 GMT > > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The > > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is > > just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much > > more complicated than that. > > Just curious what Phil has to say. Adding an acidifier to an already acidified diet is very risky business - but if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, you may not have a choice. However, adding an acidifier to an already acidified diet is a bit more complicated than just giving the cat the pill or mixing it in food and checking urine pH and sediment once in awhile.
The dose must be carefully calculated and serum chemistries that includes total CO2 content and potassium levels must done periodically to make sure that the cat's acid-base status is still normal. Otherwise, chronic acidification can lead to metabolic acidosis which in turn can cause potassium depletion which causes further metabolic acidosis and even further potassium depletion and eventually renal dysfunction and bone demineralization.
Wellness contains a lot of plant material (sweet potatoes, carrots, vegetable gums, flaxseed, alfalfa, cranberries, blueberries, yellow squash, yellow zucchini, garlic, spirulina) so it has to be already highly acidified to produce a low urine pH. The amount of dl-methionine already in the diet must be considered in calculating the dose because high levels of dl-methionine causes hemolytic anemia, met hemoglobinemia, and Heinz body formation in cats.
Phil
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 20:34 GMT > > > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The > > > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Phil Now THAT is an answer. You rock, Phil, honest to Cat you do. :)
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 04:28 GMT >Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet >before doing anything. The suggestion to >use any Wellness product with added >urinary acidifiers is just plain dangerous. OH BS. I see you cry "dangerous" but you don't elaborate. Typical. I have a rescue cat that lives with a friend of mine that is prone to struvite crystals and had several urinary tract problems and blockage. With the vet's approval we put him on Wellness canned and Methioform tablets. He has been managed this way without incident now for a few *years* and has no struvite or oxalate crystals or stones.
Megan.
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
-L. - 10 Mar 2005 07:49 GMT > >Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet > >before doing anything. The suggestion to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Megan. My first cat Pookie was on Methioform daily for about 10 years, after a wicked UTI and obstruction. He did beautifully on it and never had another incidence of UTI/obstruction.
-L.
Karen Swenor - 10 Mar 2005 20:31 GMT > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is > just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much > more complicated than that. Mr. Crane, could you please elaborate? My cat Barney is a 6 year old male who's blocked 3 times in the past. The only food he will eat is Hill's Turkey Canned and Hill's Liver and Chicken.
I've also been using Methioform tablets to treat the Hill's food. Am I doing him harm?
Thanks Karen
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:23 GMT If it ain't broke don't fix it - that would be the first rule here. I presume you are seeing your vet on a regular basis? Getting a urinalysis done occasionally? One of the issues around bladder stones and crystals is that the age of the cat has an impact. Cats from 1-6 years of age are more likely to be struvite formers, cats over age 7 are more likely to be CaOX formers - feeding methioform or other urinary acidifiers to a cat forming CaOx stones would be the wrong way to go. Persian, Himalayans, and Burmese are more likely to be CaOx formers as well. Let you veterinarian be your guide here, s/he has much more knowledge and more importantly knows _your_ cat as an individual.
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 04:00 GMT > Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones > or crystals. In my "Hey Phil" reply to this I am summoning ANOTHER Phil who has been helpful in the past. It seems ridiculous to me to choose a food (like Wellness) that you have to supplement.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 04:44 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>It seems ridiculous to me to choose a >food (like Wellness) that you have to >supplement. When a cat *won't* eat prescription food, or you don't want to feed your cat crap, then you need to find alternatives. Did you not notice the subject line?
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 05:28 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >It seems ridiculous to me to choose a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > cat crap, then you need to find alternatives. Did you not notice the > subject line? There are other foods, you flaming idiot. lol
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 06:19 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>There are other foods Yes, we know that. Read the post again and take note of where I said "or you don't want to feed your cat crap." Then go read the labels on some of the prescription foods and look at some of the garbage they contain. Prescription foods are not the be all end all to treating a medical condition and there are always alternatives.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 06:40 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >There are other foods [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Prescription foods are not the be all end all to treating a medical > condition and there are always alternatives. Megan you are beginning to depress me. A discussion of other foods than Wellness would be helpful for all. If you must be stupid, can you please try to be a little less aggressively stupid? It is not necessary for you to feel you are the authority on all cat things. Or is it? This is a discussion forum. Wake up.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 14:03 GMT marys@catlover.com whined:
>A discussion of other foods than Wellness >would be helpful for all. If you bothered to do any research you would find that there is a wide variation in the urine ph different foods promote, and for this situation Wellness is one that works well and also is a high quality diet. I am not responsible for the fact that there just aren't that many good foods on the market.
>This is a discussion forum. Wake up. And here you are yet again complaining yet adding nothing of substance. If you actually stayed on topic you wouldn't have much to say.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 19:14 GMT > marys@catlover.com whined: > >A discussion of other foods than Wellness [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > diet. I am not responsible for the fact that there just aren't that many > good foods on the market. Oh please. Wellness is not the only alternative to Hills prescription s/d. In fact, since you have to suppement it with a urine acidifier, in and of itself it isn't an alternative at all.
> >This is a discussion forum. Wake up. > > And here you are yet again complaining yet adding nothing of substance. > If you actually stayed on topic you wouldn't have much to say. I am always on topic. Do you think you can just SAY something and make it true? *shaking my head*
I am interested in what others have to say about the topic of this thread. There must be others rather than one that requires additional medication in order to be effective. You are such a self-important chump, Megan.
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:25 GMT Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick one ingredient you think is "crap" then show us the peer reviewed published data that supports your opinion that this particular ingredient is crap. Let's see if you can prove your own thesis.
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 23:40 GMT > Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick one ingredient you think is > "crap" then show us the peer reviewed published data that supports your > opinion that this particular ingredient is crap. Let's see if you can > prove your own thesis. This sounds like a great idea.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 11 Mar 2005 04:19 GMT >Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick >one ingredient you think is "crap" then >show us the peer reviewed published data >that supports your opinion that this >particular ingredient is crap. Here you go again with your BS. You don't need a "peer reviewed" study to know if something is crap. Do *you* need one to know sh.t is crap? Probably. Ingredients have been discussed here over and over and claiming a cat can "tolerate" corn, soybean mill run, ethoxyquin and other garbage you put in pet food doesn't mean it should be in there or that it is species appropriate. You can do all the smoke and mirrors you want. Smart people see right through you. Oh and while you're at it, we're still waiting for you to answer the question equalizer put to you asking if Hill's, who claims they don't do animal testing, uses/pays outside sources to do animal testing.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 04:34 GMT > >Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick > >one ingredient you think is "crap" then [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Megan This is precisely how I expected you to answer.
Steve Crane - 11 Mar 2005 13:13 GMT OK ZUZU Let's just concentrate on ingredinet at a time. You claim:
>Here you go again with your BS. You don't need a "peer reviewed" study
>to know if something is crap. Do *you* need one to know sh.t is crap? >Probably. Ingredients have been discussed here over and over and >claiming a cat can "tolerate" corn Now you've made the claim - now prove that corn is "bad" for cats. Show us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats. Show us any clinical trial or any kind which proves your point.
And yes you do need more than just wacko internet fantasy opinions to "know if something is crap" otherwise is it nothing but whacko ideas, internet fantasies, and purely erroneous emotional judgements.
Now - prove your claims or admit you haven't got a clue about feline nutrition. Your choice.
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 15:44 GMT > OK ZUZU > Let's just concentrate on ingredinet at a time. You claim: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Now - prove your claims or admit you haven't got a clue about feline > nutrition. Your choice. Steve, the science behind Megan's "expertise" is very complicated. Let me sum it up for you. "Meat good. Everything else bad." Granted, it may be true. But that is as complicated as it gets.
Meghan Noecker - 11 Mar 2005 23:08 GMT >Steve, the science behind Megan's "expertise" is very complicated. >Let me sum it up for you. "Meat good. Everything else bad." >Granted, it may be true. But that is as complicated as it gets. Well, don't tell that to my cat Maynard. If given the choice between meat and peas or mushrooms, he will choose the peas and mushrooms. He actually gets hysterical if I throw my peas in the trash and forget to give them to him. He also loves corn, lima beans, carrots, and more. And he's 18 1/2. He's been eating veggies since he was a kitten when he stole the peas off my plate. I had picked them out of my tuna caserole, and he could just as easily have stolen the tuna.
Kira also loves corn and carrots and the occasional pea. Duffy loved broccoli.
And the vet always recommends rice when the cats have diarrhea or vomiting.
 Signature -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
buglady - 12 Mar 2005 11:05 GMT Show
> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats. .......cats are obligate carnivores. Period.
buglady take out the dog before replying
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 16:47 GMT > Show > > us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > buglady > take out the dog before replying So then why are there so many fruits and vegetables in Wellness if that is the food of choice, according to Megan zuzu22@webtv.net?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 18:31 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>So then why are there so many fruits and >vegetables in Wellness You have something to back up that claim? You can't judge the amount of each ingredient simply by seeing it listed. A label could list 10 fruits/vegetables yet those items in total would comprise a very small percentage of the total product. Wellness is one of the lowest carb foods on the market, which in and of itself makes it obvious that the amount is very small. Certain people/sockpuppets love to throw out the claim that it's too high in plant matter but they've never offered proof and the numbers say otherwise. As much time as you spend online (good lord do you ever leave the house?) you could do something useful and learn a little about pet food instead of spending countless hours lying about and attacking people. You reap what you sow.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:47 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >So then why are there so many fruits and > >vegetables in Wellness > > You have something to back up that claim? See Phil's post below, asshat.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 01:59 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>See Phil's post It doesn't back up anything. I didn't see any info posted that showed ingredient percentages and speculation just doesn't cut it.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 04:19 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >See Phil's post > It doesn't back up anything. I didn't see any info posted that showed > ingredient percentages and speculation just doesn't cut it. > > Megan So you don't KNOW the percentages? If not, then your recommendation is based upon .... now put on your thinking cap ... ready? ...... Speculation. Which as you say, does not cut it. Just another example of your not knowing what the hell you're talking about.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 05:55 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>So you don't KNOW the percentages? Of course I do. I called the company directly for information and I have posted them in the past. Here's one example:
Wellness Turkey and Salmon
DMB Protein 52% Fat 34.8% Fiber .4% Carbs 12.8%
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 06:58 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>So you don't KNOW the percentages? Of course I do. I called the company directly for information and I have posted them in the past. Here's one example:
Wellness Turkey and Salmon
DMB Protein 52% Fat 34.8% Fiber .4% Carbs 12.8%
My bad. I would have known this but I never read the lengthy catfood threads.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:47 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > My bad. I would have known this but I never read the lengthy > catfood threads. When reading labels, keep in mind that ingredients can be used in more than one way by different companies - depending on the marketing theme for the food. Thus, the total protein may not necessarily be derived all from animal sources. For example, alfalfa can be used as a protein, carbohydrate or fiber source. As I said, without seeing the actual formula, you don't really know what % of the protein is actually derived from animal sources. This applies to all brands.
Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 17:55 GMT > > marys@catlover.com wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Phil And they don't let you see the actual formula, do they?
PawsForThought - 12 Mar 2005 19:50 GMT >> Show >>> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > in Wellness if that is the food of choice, according to > Megan zuzu22@webtv.net? I don't think Wellness has a high number of fruits and veggies per se. Cats in their natural diet would get a small amount of fruits and veggies in their prey's stomachs. They can add nutritional value and fiber to the diet.
 Signature PawsForThought
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 22:26 GMT > >> Show > >>> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > veggies in their prey's stomachs. They can add nutritional value and > fiber to the diet. Lauren,
Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of the product is made up of fruit and vegetables, only that there are certainly several kinds in it. If the fact that cats are obligate carnivores means that "corn has a deleterious effect on cats," which is what buglady responded, then why are there ANY in Wellness?
Phil P. - 12 Mar 2005 23:28 GMT > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of > the product is made up of fruit and vegetables, only that there > are certainly several kinds in it. 10 of the first 15 ingredients are plant material. Sweet potatoes are listed 5th - after chicken broth which is >90% water and makes the actual chicken weight of the the broth effectively much, much less than 5th - and consequently moves all the subsequent plant products higher up on the ingredients list. The biological value of potatoes is even lower than corn.
Ingredients are listed predominately by weight. Thus although the first three ingredients are meat products, the *combined weight* of *all* 10 plant products:
5. Sweet Potatoes 6. Carrots, 7. Vegetable Gums, 8. Flaxseed, 10. Alfalfa, 11. Cranberries, 12. Blueberries, 13. Yellow Squash, 14. Yellow Zucchini, 15. Garlic,
could easily exceed the weight of the third, or second, or even the first ingredient. Given the numerous plant products (10 of the first 15 ingredients) its very difficult - if not impossible - to know with certainty whether the diet actually contains more meat than plant material without seeing the actual formula - which no pet food company will make public.
If the fact that cats are obligate
> carnivores "Obligate carnivore" is often a misused term. "Obligate carnivore" means the cat must obtain certain nutrients from animal sources - not that the cat must eat only meat.
means that "corn has a deleterious effect on cats,"
> which is what buglady responded, then why are there ANY in > Wellness? Because all those 'human grade' veggies look good on the label and create anthropomorphic appeal. For example, carrots and beta carotene; cats can't convert beta carotene into vitamin A and must obtain preformed vitamin A. But carrots and beta carotene sure look on the label and advertising... Further down the ingredient list, vitamin A is listed as a supplement... So, IMO, carrots are included for anthropomorphic appeal.
The biological value of potatoes is even lower than corn - but 'sweet potatoes' sure look good on the label, too.
I feed my cats Wellness as part of their rotating diet because I find the *nutrient levels* favorable - not because I fell for their 'human grade ingredients' or 'all natural' advertising gimmicks.
What do people think they're getting for 10 cents more a can - prime rib? LOL!
Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:42 GMT > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > What do people think they're getting for 10 cents more a can - prime rib? > LOL! Thanks, Phil. I take it then that Wellness is no better than any other cat food that lists "meat" and not "meat byproducts" as the first ingredient, then? Is that your assessment? And if this is true, and one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe one might use ANY such cat food that has meat as a first ingredient and dose the cat with urine acidifier? Only I believe you wrote that what Megan recommended is NOT safe. Correct?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 02:06 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>Only I believe you wrote that what >Megan recommended is NOT safe. What I recommended was a program that was ok'd by a real veterinarian, and it has worked for years with no deleterious effects. Apparently you aren't smart enough to take into consideration the fact that Methioform tablets require a prescription and therefore this approach must be ok'd by a veterinarian. Others have posted that they have done the same with good results yet I don't see a peep out of you about that, which is further proof that the welfare of cats aren't your concern.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 04:21 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > >Only I believe you wrote that what [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > tablets require a prescription and therefore this approach must be ok'd > by a veterinarian. > It was okayed by YOUR vet for YOUR cat. Furthermore I do not believe that Wellness supplemented by methioform is the only alternative to Hill's Prescription s.d.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 05:51 GMT marys@catlover.com wrote:
>It was okayed by YOUR vet for YOUR >cat. And several others posted the same.
>Furthermore I do not believe that >Wellness supplemented by methioform is >the only alternative to Hill's Prescription >s.d. I never said it was.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
cc - 13 Mar 2005 06:10 GMT Wellness uses alfalfa in its food, and until there is proof that alfalfa is NOT toxic to cats, I refuse to buy it or feed it to my cats.
http://www.felinefuture.com/nutrition/bpo_ch8a.php http://www.cah.com/dr_library/cattox.html http://www.moggies.co.uk/plants.html http://www.geocities.com/catwhiskasplace/plants.html http://www.geocities.com/stuartplaid/toxic.html http://mainecoonrescue.com/poison.html
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 06:44 GMT >Wellness uses alfalfa in its food, and >until there is proof that alfalfa is NOT >toxic to cats, I refuse to buy it or feed it to >my cats. Raw alfalfa is a problem, but cooked alfalfa is not toxic to cats and it says so in one of the links you provide. Cat foods are cooked at high temperatures. I've been feeding 24 cats Wellness for *years* and none of them have died of alfalfa poisoning or had digestive problems. You might want to talk to the folks on the Yahoo IBD list as well. Many people there have been able to manage their cat's IBD using Wellness.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 06:57 GMT > marys@catlover.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I never said it was. Well good. Now maybe someone will chime in with some other alternatives.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:45 GMT > > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that > > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > cat food that lists "meat" and not "meat byproducts" as the first > ingredient, then? Is that your assessment? Yes. However, meat by-products aren't necessarily a bad thing - meat by-products generally contain more nutrients than skeletal meat. Cats eat animal by-products when they consume a mouse.
And if this is true, and
> one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe > one might use ANY such cat food that has meat as a first ingredient > and dose the cat with urine acidifier? Basically, yes. But I would still avoid brands with high phosphorus levels and low protein to ash ratios.
Only I believe you wrote that
> what Megan recommended is NOT safe. Correct? As I said, adding an acidifier to an acidified diet is risky business - *but* if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, you don't have much of a choice. In such cases, the benefits outweigh the risks - since the consequences of urethral obstruction are oliguric renal failure and death or permanent damage to the urethra.
Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 17:52 GMT > > > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that > > > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > by-products generally contain more nutrients than skeletal meat. Cats eat > animal by-products when they consume a mouse. I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that "meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from an anthropomorphic angle.
> And if this is true, and > > one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Phil Thanks.
Okay, so summing up: Hill's Prescription s/d is the best thing for cats that have had urinary tract problems, in particular blockages. If the cat really will not eat this, then any cat food that has a low phosphorus level and a low ash level (high protein low ash) can be used and possibly supplemented with a urine acidifier such as Methioform--IF the vet advises that this is okay.
Meghan Noecker - 14 Mar 2005 09:05 GMT >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from >an anthropomorphic angle. Quite possible. My nephew's cat won't eat chicken or steak, but he will eat a mouse. I guess those byproducts add more flavor.
 Signature -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
Mary - 14 Mar 2005 18:58 GMT > >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that > >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from > >an anthropomorphic angle. > > Quite possible. My nephew's cat won't eat chicken or steak, but he > will eat a mouse. I guess those byproducts add more flavor. Yep. And where does taurine come from, I wonder, that it is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs and bones and toenails and stuff? ;)
Steve G - 14 Mar 2005 22:16 GMT (...)
> Yep. And where does taurine come from, I wonder, that it > is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs > and bones and toenails and stuff? ;) Not hair, nor eyeballs, nor toenails.
IIRC it's most concentrated in the central nervous system, heart and striate muscle.
S.
Mary - 15 Mar 2005 00:30 GMT > (...) > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > IIRC it's most concentrated in the central nervous system, heart and > striate muscle. Thanks Steve. I was just looking at a site about that. It comes from animals, just not all animals.
Phil P. - 14 Mar 2005 23:24 GMT > > >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that > > >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs > and bones and toenails and stuff? ;) You're partly right. Retinas contain high concentrations of free taurine. Most other animal tissues, particularly muscle, heart (also a muscle), viscera and brain - and shellfish, also contain high levels of taurine. Plants don't contain any.
Most animals are able to synthesize enough taurine from methionine and cysteine to meet their needs. However, cats have a limited capacity to synthesize taurine and must receive it preformed - just like vitamin A (cats can't convert beta carotene
Before 1986, many cats suffered from Feline Central Retinal Degeneration and a form of dilated cardiomypoathy (taurine-deficient dilated cardiomyopathy-TD-DCM) because the cat's taurine requirements were not known and taurine was not supplemented in cat foods. After 1987, feline diets were fortified with taurine and both diseases all but disappeared. Along with insufficient protein, the lack of taurine is another reason why dog food should not be fed to cats.
Phil.
Mary - 15 Mar 2005 00:44 GMT > > > >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that > > > >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > with insufficient protein, the lack of taurine is another reason why dog > food should not be fed to cats. It's nice to know that good work in cat nutrition continues to be done.
Phil P. - 14 Mar 2005 23:17 GMT > > > > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness > that [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > possibly supplemented with a urine acidifier such as Methioform--IF > the vet advises that this is okay. A few pet food manufacturers make struvite diets so there's a good chance the cat will accept at least one of them -- that's if the owner at least offers them to the cat. Also, there are ways to enhance the flavor of struvite diets without altering their effectiveness. Acidifiers should be the last resort.
Phil
-L. - 13 Mar 2005 09:17 GMT > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > whether the diet actually contains more meat than plant material without > seeing the actual formula - which no pet food company will make public. This is true of most cat foods, though, isn't it? I don't think I know of a cat food where the third, fourth or 5th ingredient isn't plant-based (as well as subsequent ingredients). And considering the price of cranberries and blueberries (especially), I doubt the last 5 ingredients are in very high concentration.
Bottom line is, you have to feed your cats what works - and Welness is certainly better than a lot of cat foods on the market.
IIRC Methioform was prescribed for cats long before foods that "promote healthy urinary tract pH" were on the market (I remember using it in the 70's). I'm not saying it's an *ideal* way to ensure no more FUS, but under a vet's care, it certainly is one option that is viable, especially if you have a finicky cat that will only eat certain foods.
-L.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:48 GMT And considering the
> price of cranberries and blueberries (especially), I doubt the last 5 > ingredients are in very high concentration. If you're correct, then their presence is designed to create an anthropomorphic appeal rather than provide any nutritional value. I don't have a problem with that type of marketing gimmick since it wasn't a factor in my decision for choosing Wellness. The nutrient levels are close enough to my preferences.
> Bottom line is, you have to feed your cats what works - and Welness is > certainly better than a lot of cat foods on the market. Absolutely. Wellness is a component of my cats' rotating diet.
> IIRC Methioform was prescribed for cats long before foods that "promote > healthy urinary tract pH" were on the market (I remember using it in > the 70's). I'm not saying it's an *ideal* way to ensure no more FUS, > but under a vet's care, it certainly is one option that is viable, > especially if you have a finicky cat that will only eat certain foods. As I said, if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, then you don't have much of a choice. In such cases, the benefits of an acidifier certainly outweigh the risks - since the consequences of urethral obstruction are oliguric acute renal failure and possibly death or permanent damage to the urethra.
Phil
|
|