Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Other alternatives to Hills prescription s/d?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phil - 10 Mar 2005 01:15 GMT
Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones
or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills
prescription s/d was recommended. We have both cans and dry food of this
variety.
Here is our problem. We have two other adult cats besides Ripley, our
surgery kitty.
Can all three cats eat this s/d on a daily basis? Our vet seemed to indicate
that they could, but that leads to our second problem.
*None* of the cats (Ripley included) will eat the canned s/d. They will not
even be so much as in the same room with this food. They all will more or
less pick at the dry s/d, but I fear they will never change their attitudes
toward the canned. One of these cats is a senior and on the thin side so I
don't need him going on any kind of hunger strike. It would also be
extremely difficult to feed them seperately.
So is there another more commercially made canned cat food that would have a
similar formula to the s/d but that they might all find a bit more to their
liking? I'm not talking necessarily about a cheap supermarket brand. We have
several pet shops that carry a wide variety of more 'natural' type brands.

Any other suggestions to help this kitty with her life of hopefully
remaining bladder stone free?

Thanks,

Phil
Karen - 10 Mar 2005 01:40 GMT
> Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones
> or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Phil

I know there are at least two other versions. One by Eukanuba, one by
Walthams, oh and I think there is one by IVD. All available through vets.
Maybe your vet could arrange a sampling of each?
Phil - 10 Mar 2005 01:54 GMT
> > Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones
> > or crystals. The crystals were evidently of the Struvite variety and Hills
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Walthams, oh and I think there is one by IVD. All available through vets.
> Maybe your vet could arrange a sampling of each?

Thanks, I'll inquire about those.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 03:08 GMT
An easy alternative to feeding an acidified prescription food is to feed
*canned* Wellness brand cat food and have the vet prescribe Methioform
tabs, which is a urinary acidifier in pill form. Wellness promotes a
urine ph very similar to Science Diet c/d and the Methioform tabs will
send the ph into the more acid range which is what s/d would do. It
would not be wise to feed the other cats the precription diet as it is
designed to dissolve struvite crystals and would be too acid for a
healthy cat, putting them at risk for developing calcium oxalate
crystals or stones. All your cats could eat the Wellness with the one
cat getting the Methioform tablets (which a lot of cats really like the
taste of.) The main flavors I feed my own cats are chicken, turkey,
chicken and herring, and turkey and salmon. For future reference,
feeding scheduled meals of a high quality canned diet and eliminating
dry food will help avoid situations such as the one you're dealing with.
HTH.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 03:29 GMT
Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The
suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is
just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much
more complicated than that.
Cheryl - 10 Mar 2005 03:39 GMT
> Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything.
> The suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary
> acidifiers is just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only
> issue here, it is much more complicated than that.

Please elaborate for us Steve.

Signature

Cheryl

Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:19 GMT
Feline Lower urinary tract disease is substantially more than just
urine pH. Magnesium levels, potassium levels, calcium levels, sodium
levels and a number of biological factors must be taken into account.

Pet foods designed for struvite dissolution or struvite maintenace
almost always are subject to much more critical testing than just urine
pH. Hill's prefers to use a system called APR - activity product ratio.
You can google on this and learn more about it if your wish. Basically
this tests ALL the factors involved, including biological and
determines if a given nutrient profile will acheive the goal. Waltham /
Royal Canin uses what they call the RSS - Risk Super Saturation - it's
similar test process, but done in vitro. I am not sure what Purina does
nor Eukanuba. Neither promote thier food for struvite dissolution, only
for stuvite maintenace. They haven't ever published anything relative
to the process they choose to use. Leo over in Europe uses RSS as well.

Where ZUZU always goes wrong is she allows her undisguised hatred for
Hill's to interfere with her logic. It's an emotional decision and not
one established in any science or logical facts. Wellness has never
published ANY testing of any kind to insure that struvite dissolution
will ocurr with thier diet with added methioform or any other urinary
acidifier. Wellness can't even tell you what the mean urine pH range
will be of the various diets they produce and why on earth should they?
- they are not in the business of creating theerapeutic diets. They
create diets for healthy kitties.

Like usual ZUZU likes to stick with third grade math level of analyzing
diets - just the ingredients and never mind the nutrients. In the case
of any animal with a disease condition that is patently dangerous in
the extreme. Examples of this cat or that cat that "did well" are
completely meaningless. We are talking about the general population of
struvite dissolution cats here, not one single cat or even a dozen
single cats. The peer reviewed published data covering Hill's and Royal
Canin's dissoltuion products is huge - in contrast there isn't a single
bit of published data to support Wellness and methioform tabs. Advice
like that can send the cat back for another surgery and will ZUZU pay
the bill for it? Not likely.

As an interesting note to the whole discussion. You may know that since
1981 Calcium Oxalate stones have grown as a percentage of all stones in
a cat. By 1995 CaOx stones overcame struvites as the most common stone.
This trend began reversing itself in 2002 and now once again in 2004
there were more struvite stones found that CaOx stones.

1999 33% Struvite, 55% CaOx
2002 40% Struvite, 50% CaOx
2003 42% Struvite, 47% CaOx
2004 45% Struvite, 44% CaOx
The missing percentage is taken up by urates, cystines, and assorted
other unusual uroliths.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 11 Mar 2005 03:59 GMT
<snip expected bullshit>

Nice try at scaring people away from what is working for them. Hopefully
they'll see you have a financial interest in everything you post, look
at your lies with a critical eye, and ignore the scamming you do.

And BTW, Wellness does tell you the ph range for their foods. Call them
and ask. I did.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


gaubster2@comcast.net - 11 Mar 2005 18:48 GMT
> <snip expected bullshit>
>
> Nice try at scaring people away from what is working for them. Hopefully
> they'll see you have a financial interest in everything you post, look
> at your lies with a critical eye, and ignore the scamming you do.

Megan, are you some lonely old spinster w/ a bunch of cats that is so
withdrawn from society that you've let you hatred and bitterness
consume you??  Your venom is not neccessary here just because someone
doesn't agree w/ you!

You are a Hill's Hater and a proponent of OMH Wellness which does
exactly ZERO research into small animal clinical nutrition.  You're one
of those ignorant people who doesn't believe facts and science, you buy
into emotion only and when someone doesn't agree with you, or questions
you in any way, you attack them.  Why?
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 19:12 GMT
> > <snip expected bullshit>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> consume you??  Your venom is not neccessary here just because someone
> doesn't agree w/ you!

She does do this but ad hominem attacks make you just as bad as she
is. She sucks me into this kind of behavior on a regular basis. And she's
got Brian Link and others doing the same thing. It may be unavoidable
in such a public forum, but it doesn't contribute much to the discussion.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 03:23 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:

>She sucks me into this kind of behavior
>on a regular basis.

This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year.

>And she's got Brian Link and others
>doing the same thing.

Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Cheryl - 12 Mar 2005 03:44 GMT
On Fri 11 Mar 2005 10:23:21p,  wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav
(news:19807-423260A9-529@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net):

> marys@catlover.com wrote:
>
>>She sucks me into this kind of behavior
>>on a regular basis.

Oh Irony Meter!!!  rofl!!!!!!

> This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year.
>
>>And she's got Brian Link and others
>>doing the same thing.
>
> Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P

I almost wish I could see the entire post but then again...
naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa... hehehe I'm sure it was more of the same 'ol
same 'ol.

> Megan

Signature

Cheryl

Mary - 12 Mar 2005 03:59 GMT
> On Fri 11 Mar 2005 10:23:21p,  wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav
> (news:19807-423260A9-529@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net):
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Oh Irony Meter!!!  rofl!!!!!!

Oh, yes! Kind of like how you lied and said you
didn't hang in the troll groups and slurp Big Bad
Buzzard right before he admitted you did! Oh the
Irony. Oh, wait. That's not right. That is just one
example of  your lying your sorry a.s off. lol!

> > This has to be the funniest thing I've read all year.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa... hehehe I'm sure it was more of the same 'ol
> same 'ol.

It is indeed. How could it be otherwise, as long as you are
a liar and a hypocrite, and that isn't going to change. :)
Cheryl - 12 Mar 2005 04:34 GMT
>> > marys@catlover.com wrote:
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Irony. Oh, wait. That's not right. That is just one
> example of  your lying your sorry a.s off. lol!

FFS you stupid woman, learn to comprehend. I never denied being a reg
at AHM at all. Never. I denied trolling other groups like you accused
me of.  "Invasion" I think you called it. I was in AHM to learn.  I
posted to the whole "world" my intentions there and here.

"Sucking you in" to bad behavior my a.s.  I read that at work today
where you *aren't* KF'd as you are in my Xnews *note posting from OE
just to refute your demonization of me YET AGAIN* and I just laughed
my a.s off!!!  Your behavior here has been nothing but nasty,
miserable, wretched and just plain mean from the start.  For some
reason you seem to be reinventing yourself lately.  The only sucking
you do is to newcomers and a select old regs and try to make yourself
look like a decent human being. Many of us know the real "Mary" and
who "Mary" wanted everyone to think she was.  A big bad tough bitch
that no one should disagree with.

How many other identities have you had?  Hmm?
marys@catlovernospam.com (lets not forget the other variance of this
you still use occassionally that I had to KF for a second time,
marys@catlover.com, and previously crazyaboutfelines@yahoo.com and
before that rosefan@email.com

Google speaks volumes.  And as for you continuously posting my former
email address of jlh@petitmorte.net over and over again ad nauseam, I
haven't used that address in years and am hiding nothing. I don't have
that email address anymore. . Go ahead and keep "demonizing" me all
you want.  I really don't give a sh.t.  You're proving nothing and
you're not hurting me in the least.

FOAD bitch.
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 17:09 GMT
> >> > marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> me of.  "Invasion" I think you called it. I was in AHM to learn.  I
> posted to the whole "world" my intentions there and here.

Oh, right. Your boss "assigned" you the task of learning to
hack. That's right. Told you to post in the troll groups with
your good bud Buzzard and his illustrious buds. You're
still posting in alt.buzzard.rules, did your boss "assign"
that too? I am laughing at you, you lying sack of cat
poo. Wahahahahaha!

> "Sucking you in" to bad behavior my a.s.  I read that at work today
> where you *aren't* KF'd as you are in my Xnews *note posting from OE
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> who "Mary" wanted everyone to think she was.  A big bad tough bitch
> that no one should disagree with.

Sure you should! I have never tried to censor anyone. As for the rest,
I am what I am. Nasty at times, etc. etc. The difference between us
is that I am not posting to Usenet in some pathetic attempt to find
"friends" as you do. Just having my say. You and Lynnie and Megan
are the types of Kooks who have so little in your personal life
that you have to make Usenet some sort of social device. It's
just a means of communication.

> How many other identities have you had?  Hmm?
> marys@catlovernospam.com (lets not forget the other variance of this
> you still use occassionally that I had to KF for a second time,
> marys@catlover.com, and previously crazyaboutfelines@yahoo.com and
> before that rosefan@email.com

Pssst .... if I wanted to have "different identities" I would have changed
my NAME when I changed emails, fuckface. I change emails whenever
it suits me, but always use the same name and have announced it when
I changed emails so that pussies like you can KEEP me in your killfile.
Damned polite of me.

> Google speaks volumes.  And as for you continuously posting my former
> email address of jlh@petitmorte.net over and over again ad nauseam, I
> haven't used that address in years and am hiding nothing. I don't have
> that email address anymore. . Go ahead and keep "demonizing" me all
> you want.  I really don't give a sh.t.  You're proving nothing and
> you're not hurting me in the least.

Cheryl: everyone who reads the group SAW you post about
Googling me to "find out who I really am" for months. Although
I knew you from years ago, I said nothing about your trolling buddies.
I finally mentioned it because the irony was killing me. All anyone
needs to to is Google jlh@petitmorte.net to see what you were
doing, or to go to alt.buzzard.rules to see you playing there
this month. Google the Google queen, and find out that she
has much more to hide than you do. It's funny. Damned funny.
You just got "spanked," Trollette. Ain't no thang. It's only
Usenet.

> FOAD bitch.

Thanks for these good wishes. Not just yet, though.
-L. - 12 Mar 2005 20:10 GMT
<snip>

> I really don't give a sh.t.  You're proving nothing and
> you're not hurting me in the least.

She must be in heat again.  She's humping everyone's posts again.
Either that or she forgot her meds.

-L.
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:36 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -L.

That's it. I am in heat. You so smart. But no meds, Lynnie. I
am high on life. If I were a fat under-educated socialist married
to a pick-up driving loser I met online, now that might call for
Xanax.
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 03:56 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Yeah right, cuz I have all the power. :-P

Now that is the funniest thing I have heard all day.
Point is, you launch ad hominem attacks because
you are not bright enough to advance an effective
argument.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 06:08 GMT
marys@catlover.com lied:

>Point is, you launch ad hominem attacks
>because you are not bright enough to
>advance an effective argument.

You are truly delusional and have no sense of personal responsibility.
You do, however, have quite the talent for hypocrisy.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 12 Mar 2005 16:31 GMT
> marys@catlover.com lied:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You are truly delusional and have no sense of personal responsibility.
> You do, however, have quite the talent for hypocrisy.

Yet another ad hominem attack. That you for
proving my point. :) This is what you do every time
your bogus recommendations are challenged. It's
hilarious.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 18:22 GMT
maryscatlover.com wrote:
>Yet another ad hominem attack.
No. A response to one of many by you. HTH.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


equalizer - 11 Mar 2005 23:57 GMT
>Path: news2.newsguy.com!lana.pathlink.com!lex!rex!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>From: "gaubster2@comcast.net" <cgaub@comcast.net>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>into emotion only and when someone doesn't agree with you, or questions
>you in any way, you attack them.  Why?

Hee! Heee! Heee!

"Gaubster", who is really Steve Crane, is posting from 198.179.238.3,
which resolves as follows:

OrgName:    Hill's Pet Nutrition
OrgID:      HPN
Address:    400 S. W. Eighth
City:       Topeka
StateProv:  KS
PostalCode: 66603-3945
Country:    US

NetRange:   198.179.238.0 - 198.179.238.255
CIDR:       198.179.238.0/24
NetName:    HILLSPET
NetHandle:  NET-198-179-238-0-1
Parent:     NET-198-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Assignment
Comment:    
RegDate:    1993-11-18
Updated:    1993-11-18

TechHandle: RAE2-ARIN
TechName:   Ewing, Roger A.
TechPhone:  +1-913-231-5340
TechEmail:  

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-03-10 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

Weeeeeeeee!!!!  Got a bit of a commute from the Portland area, eh
Gauby?!??!

Gaubster works for Hill's, Ooooooooo Hooooooo Hooooooo Hooooooooooo!!!!!

This is gonna be FUUUUUUUUUN!!!!!!!!!

Hey Stevie -- I know in the past you've said that everything you say on
here is your own opinion, and has nothing to do with your employer!! Are
you gonna take the heat on here publicly, or are we gonna put it to your
employer with the fact that you're using their infrastructure to post
your venomous diatribes on here to promote Hill's products using what
can only be described as pure, undiluted SLEAZE?!?

eq
Magic Mood Jeep? - 12 Mar 2005 00:32 GMT
>> Path:
>> news2.newsguy.com!lana.pathlink.com!lex!rex!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>
> eq

*BUT* Steve's first posting is as such

Path:
attbi_s52!attbi_slave61!attbi_slave12!attbi_master11!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!199.218.7.141!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Steve Crane" <eodemolay@cox.net>
Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
Subject: Re: Other alternatives to Hills prescription s/d?
Date: 9 Mar 2005 19:29:44 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <1110425384.186032.136800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
References: <LcNXd.8545$603.1123@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
  <19807-422FBA13-209@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.78
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1110425388 16748 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2005 03:29:48
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <19807-422FBA13-209@storefull-3251.bay.webtv.net>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com

Note the NNTP of 66.82.9.78, which comes back to
Comment:    ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
RegDate:    2001-02-28
Updated:    2003-01-21

TechHandle: ZD63-ARIN
TechName:   DirecPC
TechPhone:  +1-301-601-7205
TechEmail:  abuse@direcpc.com

OrgTechHandle: NSM5-ARIN
OrgTechName:   Network Security Manager
OrgTechPhone:  +1-301-601-7205
OrgTechEmail:  abuse@direcpc.com

 ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2005-03-10 19:10
 Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

Registrant:
Hughes Network Systems (RNIEBDWYID)
  11717 Exploration Lane
  Germantown, MD 20876
  US

  Domain Name: DIRECPC.COM

  Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
     Hughes Network Systems  (35808819O)  hostmaster@hns.com
     11717 Exploration Lane
     Germantown, MD 20876
     US
     3016017224

  Record expires on 07-Jun-2005.
  Record created on 23-Aug-2003.
  Database last updated on 11-Mar-2005 19:29:13 EST.

  Domain servers in listed order:

  NS.DIRECPC.COM               198.77.116.8
  NS.CAIS.COM                  205.177.10.10

Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion
--?
The ONE and ONLY
lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy
former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)?
email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com
http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep
equalizer - 12 Mar 2005 00:51 GMT
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©"
<nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:

<SNIP>

>*BUT* Steve's first posting is as such
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion
>--?

No confusion to it! He's posting from multiple sources. If I were to use
a dial up connection that showed my IP (I'm currently using Comcast),
I'd show a different IP than the one that would show from the source I'm
using now if I chose to let it show. Think of it this way -- In the
instance I'm pointing out, I've shown that "Steve Crane" and "Gaubster"
posted today on here from the same "telephone number". It showed on the
"caller ID". "Gaubster" and "Steve Crane" have posted from multiple
sources in the past. Today, "they" screwed up and "appeared in the same
room together". Unfortunately, we're not dealing with a Superman and
Clark Kent this time, just a money hungry little company mouthpiece.

eq

>The ONE and ONLY
>lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy
>former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)©
>email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com
>http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep

__
Info from these "two" posters headers:

Steve Crane:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3

Gaubster:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
PawsForThought - 12 Mar 2005 05:38 GMT
EQ so eloquently wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©"
> <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> eq

Seems Steve Crane and "Gaubster" use the same newsreader too - G2/0.2
For shame, for shame! LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Signature

PawsForThought

equalizer - 12 Mar 2005 10:39 GMT
Just a re-post with x-no-archive off. Thanks "John"!

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:32:18 GMT, "Magic Mood Jeep©"
<nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:

<SNIP>

>*BUT* Steve's first posting is as such
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>Just thought I would throw this in there for the confusion
>--?

No confusion to it! He's posting from multiple sources. If I were to use
a dial up connection that showed my IP (I'm currently using Comcast),
I'd show a different IP than the one that would show from the source I'm
using now if I chose to let it show. Think of it this way -- In the
instance I'm pointing out, I've shown that "Steve Crane" and "Gaubster"
posted today on here from the same "telephone number". It showed on the
"caller ID". "Gaubster" and "Steve Crane" have posted from multiple
sources in the past. Today, "they" screwed up and "appeared in the same
room together". Unfortunately, we're not dealing with a Superman and
Clark Kent this time, just a money hungry little company mouthpiece.

eq

>The ONE and ONLY
>lefthanded-pathetic-paranoid-psychotic-sarcastic-wiseass-ditzy
>former-blonde in Bloomington! (And proud of it, too)©
>email me at nalee1964 (at) insightbb (dot) com
>http://community.webshots.com/user/mgcmdjeep

__
Info from these "two" posters headers:

Steve Crane:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3

Gaubster:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.179.238.3
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 03:56 GMT
> Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The
> suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is
> just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much
> more complicated than that.

Just curious what Phil has to say.
Phil P. - 11 Mar 2005 20:18 GMT
> > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The
> > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is
> > just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much
> > more complicated than that.
>
> Just curious what Phil has to say.

Adding an acidifier to an already acidified diet is very risky business -
but if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, you may not have a choice.
However, adding an acidifier to an already acidified diet is a bit more
complicated than just giving the cat the pill or mixing it in food and
checking urine pH and sediment once in awhile.

The dose must be carefully calculated and serum chemistries that includes
total CO2 content and potassium levels must done periodically to make sure
that the cat's acid-base status is still normal.  Otherwise, chronic
acidification can lead to metabolic acidosis which in turn can cause
potassium depletion which causes further metabolic acidosis and even further
potassium depletion and eventually renal dysfunction and bone
demineralization.

Wellness contains a lot of plant material (sweet potatoes, carrots,
vegetable gums, flaxseed, alfalfa, cranberries, blueberries, yellow squash,
yellow zucchini, garlic, spirulina)  so it has to be already highly
acidified to produce a low urine pH.  The amount of dl-methionine already in
the diet must be considered in calculating the dose because high levels of
dl-methionine causes hemolytic anemia, met hemoglobinemia, and Heinz body
formation in cats.

Phil
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 20:34 GMT
> > > Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The
> > > suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Phil

Now THAT is an answer. You rock, Phil, honest to Cat you do. :)
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 04:28 GMT
>Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet
>before doing anything. The suggestion to
>use any Wellness product with added
>urinary acidifiers is just plain dangerous.

OH BS. I see you cry "dangerous" but you don't elaborate. Typical. I
have a rescue cat that lives with a friend of mine that is prone to
struvite crystals and had several urinary tract problems and blockage.
With the vet's approval we put him on Wellness canned and Methioform
tablets. He has been managed this way without incident now for a few
*years* and has no struvite or oxalate crystals or stones.

Megan.

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


-L. - 10 Mar 2005 07:49 GMT
> >Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet
> >before doing anything. The suggestion to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Megan.

My first cat Pookie was on Methioform daily for about 10 years, after a
wicked UTI and obstruction.  He did beautifully on it and never had
another incidence of UTI/obstruction.

-L.
Karen Swenor - 10 Mar 2005 20:31 GMT
> Very dangerous advice. Talk to your vet before doing anything. The
> suggestion to use any Wellness product with added urinary acidifiers is
> just plain dangerous. Urine pH is NOT the only issue here, it is much
> more complicated than that.

Mr. Crane, could you please elaborate? My cat Barney is a 6 year old
male who's blocked 3 times in the past. The only food he will eat is
Hill's Turkey Canned and Hill's Liver and Chicken.

I've also been using Methioform tablets to treat the Hill's food. Am I
doing him harm?

Thanks
Karen
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:23 GMT
If it ain't broke don't fix it - that would be the first rule here. I
presume you are seeing your vet on a regular basis? Getting a
urinalysis done occasionally? One of the issues around bladder stones
and crystals is that the age of the cat has an impact. Cats from 1-6
years of age are more likely to be struvite formers, cats over age 7
are more likely to be CaOX formers - feeding methioform or other
urinary acidifiers to a cat forming CaOx stones would be the wrong way
to go. Persian, Himalayans, and Burmese are more likely to be CaOx
formers as well. Let you veterinarian be your guide here, s/he has much
more knowledge and more importantly knows _your_ cat as an individual.
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 04:00 GMT
> Our female cat recently had emergency cystotomy surgery for bladder stones
> or crystals.

In my "Hey Phil" reply to this I am summoning ANOTHER Phil who
has been helpful in the past. It seems ridiculous to me to choose a food
(like Wellness) that you have to supplement.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 04:44 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:
>It seems ridiculous to me to choose a
>food (like Wellness) that you have to
>supplement.

When a cat *won't* eat prescription food, or you don't want to feed your
cat crap, then you need to find alternatives. Did you not notice the
subject line?

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 10 Mar 2005 05:28 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >It seems ridiculous to me to choose a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> cat crap, then you need to find alternatives. Did you not notice the
> subject line?

There are other foods, you flaming idiot. lol
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 06:19 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:
>There are other foods

Yes, we know that. Read the post again and take note of where I said "or
you don't want to feed your cat crap." Then go read the labels on some
of the prescription foods and look at some of the garbage they contain.
Prescription foods are not the be all end all to treating a medical
condition and there are always alternatives.

Megan  

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 10 Mar 2005 06:40 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >There are other foods
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Prescription foods are not the be all end all to treating a medical
> condition and there are always alternatives.

Megan you are beginning to depress me. A discussion of other
foods than Wellness would be helpful for all. If you must be
stupid, can you please try to be a little less aggressively
stupid? It is not necessary for you to feel you are the
authority on all cat things. Or is it? This is a discussion
forum. Wake up.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 10 Mar 2005 14:03 GMT
marys@catlover.com whined:
>A discussion of other foods than Wellness
>would be helpful for all.

If you bothered to do any research you would find that there is a wide
variation in the urine ph different foods promote, and for this
situation Wellness is one that works well and also is a high quality
diet. I am not responsible for the fact that there just aren't that many
good foods on the market.

>This is a discussion forum. Wake up.

And here you are yet again complaining yet adding nothing of substance.
If you actually stayed on topic you wouldn't have much to say.

Megan  

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 10 Mar 2005 19:14 GMT
> marys@catlover.com whined:
> >A discussion of other foods than Wellness
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> diet. I am not responsible for the fact that there just aren't that many
> good foods on the market.

Oh please. Wellness is not the only alternative to Hills
prescription s/d. In fact, since you have to suppement it
with a urine acidifier, in and of itself it isn't an alternative
at all.

> >This is a discussion forum. Wake up.
>
> And here you are yet again complaining yet adding nothing of substance.
> If you actually stayed on topic you wouldn't have much to say.

I am always on topic. Do you think you can just  SAY something
and make it true? *shaking my head*

I am interested in what others have to say about the topic
of this thread. There must be others rather than one that
requires additional medication in order to be effective.
You are such a self-important chump, Megan.
Steve Crane - 10 Mar 2005 21:25 GMT
Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick one ingredient you think is
"crap" then show us the peer reviewed published data that supports your
opinion that this particular ingredient is crap. Let's see if you can
prove your own thesis.
Mary - 10 Mar 2005 23:40 GMT
> Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick one ingredient you think is
> "crap" then show us the peer reviewed published data that supports your
> opinion that this particular ingredient is crap. Let's see if you can
> prove your own thesis.

This sounds like a great idea.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 11 Mar 2005 04:19 GMT
>Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick
>one ingredient you think is "crap" then
>show us the peer reviewed published data
>that supports your opinion that this
>particular ingredient is crap.

Here you go again with your BS. You don't need a "peer reviewed" study
to know if something is crap. Do *you* need one to know sh.t is crap?
Probably. Ingredients have been discussed here over and over and
claiming a cat can "tolerate" corn, soybean mill run, ethoxyquin and
other garbage you put in pet food doesn't mean it should be in there or
that it is species appropriate. You can do all the smoke and mirrors you
want. Smart people see right through you. Oh and while you're at it,
we're still waiting for you to answer the question equalizer put to you
asking if Hill's, who claims they don't do animal testing, uses/pays
outside sources to do animal testing.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 11 Mar 2005 04:34 GMT
> >Let's try this - ZUZU why don't you pick
> >one ingredient you think is "crap" then
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Megan

This is precisely how I expected you to answer.
Steve Crane - 11 Mar 2005 13:13 GMT
OK ZUZU
  Let's just concentrate on ingredinet at a time. You claim:

>Here you go again with your BS. You don't need a "peer reviewed" study

>to know if something is crap. Do *you* need one to know sh.t is crap?
>Probably. Ingredients have been discussed here over and over and
>claiming a cat can "tolerate" corn

Now you've made the claim - now prove that corn is "bad" for cats. Show
us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats.
Show us any clinical trial or any kind which proves your point.

And yes you do need more than just wacko internet fantasy opinions to
"know if something is crap" otherwise is it nothing but whacko ideas,
internet fantasies, and purely erroneous emotional judgements.

Now - prove your claims or admit you haven't got a clue about feline
nutrition. Your choice.
Mary - 11 Mar 2005 15:44 GMT
> OK ZUZU
>    Let's just concentrate on ingredinet at a time. You claim:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Now - prove your claims or admit you haven't got a clue about feline
> nutrition. Your choice.

Steve, the science behind Megan's "expertise" is very complicated.
Let me sum it up for you. "Meat good. Everything else bad."
Granted, it may be true. But that is as complicated as it gets.
Meghan Noecker - 11 Mar 2005 23:08 GMT
>Steve, the science behind Megan's "expertise" is very complicated.
>Let me sum it up for you. "Meat good. Everything else bad."
>Granted, it may be true. But that is as complicated as it gets.

Well, don't tell that to my cat Maynard. If given the choice between
meat and peas or mushrooms, he will choose the peas and mushrooms. He
actually gets hysterical if I throw my peas in the trash and forget to
give them to him. He also loves corn, lima beans, carrots, and more.
And he's 18 1/2. He's been eating veggies since he was a kitten when
he stole the peas off my plate. I had picked them out of my tuna
caserole, and he could just as easily have stolen the tuna.

Kira also loves corn and carrots and the occasional pea. Duffy loved
broccoli.

And the vet always recommends rice when the cats have diarrhea or
vomiting.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

buglady - 12 Mar 2005 11:05 GMT
Show
> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats.

.......cats are obligate carnivores.  Period.

buglady
take out the dog before replying
Mary - 12 Mar 2005 16:47 GMT
> Show
> > us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> buglady
> take out the dog before replying

So then why are there so many fruits and vegetables
in Wellness if that is the food of choice, according to
Megan zuzu22@webtv.net?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 12 Mar 2005 18:31 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:
>So then why are there so many fruits and
>vegetables in Wellness

You have something to back up that claim? You can't judge the amount of
each ingredient simply by seeing it listed. A label could list 10
fruits/vegetables yet those items in total would comprise a very small
percentage of the total product. Wellness is one of the lowest carb
foods on the market, which in and of itself makes it obvious that the
amount is very small. Certain people/sockpuppets love to throw out the
claim that it's too high in plant matter but they've never offered proof
and the numbers say otherwise. As much time as you spend online (good
lord do you ever leave the house?) you could do something useful and
learn a little about pet food instead of spending countless hours lying
about and attacking people. You reap what you sow.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:47 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >So then why are there so many fruits and
> >vegetables in Wellness
>
> You have something to back up that claim?

See Phil's post below, asshat.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 01:59 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:
>See Phil's post
It doesn't back up anything. I didn't see any info posted that showed
ingredient percentages and speculation just doesn't cut it.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 13 Mar 2005 04:19 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >See Phil's post
> It doesn't back up anything. I didn't see any info posted that showed
> ingredient percentages and speculation just doesn't cut it.
>
> Megan

So you don't KNOW the percentages? If not, then
your recommendation is based upon .... now put
on your thinking cap ... ready? ......
Speculation. Which as you say, does not
cut it. Just another example of your not
knowing what the hell you're talking about.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 05:55 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:

>So you don't KNOW the percentages?

Of course I do. I called the company directly for information and I have
posted them in the past. Here's one example:

Wellness Turkey and Salmon

DMB
Protein    52%
Fat          34.8%
Fiber           .4%
Carbs      12.8%

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 13 Mar 2005 06:58 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:

>So you don't KNOW the percentages?

Of course I do. I called the company directly for information and I have
posted them in the past. Here's one example:

Wellness Turkey and Salmon

DMB
Protein 52%
Fat 34.8%
Fiber .4%
Carbs 12.8%

My bad. I would have known this but I never read the lengthy
catfood threads.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:47 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> My bad. I would have known this but I never read the lengthy
> catfood threads.

When reading labels, keep in mind that ingredients can be used in more than
one way by different companies - depending on the marketing theme for the
food.  Thus, the total protein may not necessarily be derived all from
animal sources.  For example, alfalfa can be used as a protein, carbohydrate
or fiber source.  As I said, without seeing the actual formula, you don't
really know what % of the protein is actually derived from animal sources.
This applies to all brands.

Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 17:55 GMT
> > marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Phil

And they don't let you see the actual formula, do they?
PawsForThought - 12 Mar 2005 19:50 GMT
>> Show
>>> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> in Wellness if that is the food of choice, according to
> Megan zuzu22@webtv.net?

I don't think Wellness has a high number of fruits and veggies per se.  
Cats in their natural diet would get a small amount of fruits and
veggies in their prey's stomachs.  They can add nutritional value and
fiber to the diet.

Signature

PawsForThought

Mary - 12 Mar 2005 22:26 GMT
> >> Show
> >>> us the scientific proof that corn has any deleterious effects on cats.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> veggies in their prey's stomachs.  They can add nutritional value and
> fiber to the diet.

Lauren,

Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
the product is made up of fruit and vegetables, only that there
are certainly several kinds in it. If the fact that  cats are obligate
carnivores means that "corn has a deleterious effect on cats,"
which is what buglady responded, then why are there ANY in
Wellness?
Phil P. - 12 Mar 2005 23:28 GMT
> Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
> surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
> the product is made up of fruit and vegetables, only that there
> are certainly several kinds in it.

10 of the first 15 ingredients are plant material.  Sweet potatoes are
listed 5th - after chicken broth which is >90% water and makes the actual
chicken weight of the the broth effectively much, much less than 5th - and
consequently moves all the subsequent plant products higher up on the
ingredients list.  The biological value of potatoes is even lower than corn.

Ingredients are listed predominately by weight.  Thus although the first
three ingredients are meat products, the *combined weight* of *all* 10 plant
products:

5. Sweet Potatoes
6. Carrots,
7. Vegetable Gums,
8. Flaxseed,
10. Alfalfa,
11. Cranberries,
12. Blueberries,
13. Yellow Squash,
14. Yellow Zucchini,
15. Garlic,

could easily exceed the weight of the third, or second, or even the first
ingredient. Given the numerous plant products (10 of the first 15
ingredients) its very difficult - if not impossible - to know with certainty
whether the diet actually contains more meat than plant material without
seeing the actual formula - which no pet food company will make public.

If the fact that  cats are obligate
> carnivores

"Obligate carnivore" is often a misused term.  "Obligate carnivore" means
the cat must obtain certain nutrients from animal sources - not that the cat
must eat only meat.

means that "corn has a deleterious effect on cats,"
> which is what buglady responded, then why are there ANY in
> Wellness?

Because all those 'human grade' veggies look good on the label and create
anthropomorphic appeal.  For example, carrots and beta carotene; cats can't
convert beta carotene into vitamin A and must obtain preformed vitamin A.
But carrots and beta carotene sure look on the label and advertising...
Further down the ingredient list, vitamin A is listed as a supplement...
So, IMO, carrots are included for anthropomorphic appeal.

The biological value of potatoes is even lower than corn - but 'sweet
potatoes' sure look good on the label, too.

I feed my cats Wellness as part of their rotating diet because I find the
*nutrient levels* favorable - not because I fell for their 'human grade
ingredients' or 'all natural' advertising gimmicks.

What do people think they're getting for 10 cents more a can - prime rib?
LOL!

Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 00:42 GMT
> > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
> > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> What do people think they're getting for 10 cents more a can - prime rib?
> LOL!

Thanks, Phil. I take it then that Wellness is no better than any other
cat food that lists "meat" and not "meat byproducts" as the first
ingredient, then? Is that your assessment? And if this is true, and
one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe
one might use ANY such cat food that has meat as a first ingredient
and dose the cat with urine acidifier? Only I believe you wrote that
what Megan recommended is NOT safe. Correct?
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 02:06 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:
>Only I believe you wrote that what
>Megan recommended is NOT safe.

What I recommended was a program that was ok'd by a real veterinarian,
and it has worked for years with no deleterious effects. Apparently you
aren't smart enough to take into consideration the fact that Methioform
tablets require a prescription and therefore this approach must be ok'd
by a veterinarian. Others have posted that they have done the same with
good results yet I don't see a peep out of you about that, which is
further proof that the welfare of cats aren't your concern.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 13 Mar 2005 04:21 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
> >Only I believe you wrote that what
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> tablets require a prescription and therefore this approach must be ok'd
> by a veterinarian. >

It was okayed by YOUR vet for YOUR cat. Furthermore I do not
believe that Wellness supplemented by methioform is the only
alternative to Hill's Prescription s.d.
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 05:51 GMT
marys@catlover.com wrote:

>It was okayed by YOUR vet for YOUR
>cat.

And several others posted the same.

>Furthermore I do not believe that
>Wellness supplemented by methioform is
>the only alternative to Hill's Prescription
>s.d.

I never said it was.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


cc - 13 Mar 2005 06:10 GMT
Wellness uses alfalfa in its food, and until there is proof that alfalfa is
NOT toxic to cats, I refuse to buy it or feed it to my cats.

http://www.felinefuture.com/nutrition/bpo_ch8a.php
http://www.cah.com/dr_library/cattox.html
http://www.moggies.co.uk/plants.html
http://www.geocities.com/catwhiskasplace/plants.html
http://www.geocities.com/stuartplaid/toxic.html
http://mainecoonrescue.com/poison.html
zuzu22@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2005 06:44 GMT
>Wellness uses alfalfa in its food, and
>until there is proof that alfalfa is NOT
>toxic to cats, I refuse to buy it or feed it to
>my cats.

Raw alfalfa is a problem, but cooked alfalfa is not toxic to cats and it
says so in one of the links you provide. Cat foods are cooked at high
temperatures.
I've been feeding 24 cats Wellness for *years* and none of them have
died of alfalfa poisoning or had digestive problems. You might want to
talk to the folks on the Yahoo IBD list as well. Many people there have
been able to manage their cat's IBD using Wellness.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray


Mary - 13 Mar 2005 06:57 GMT
> marys@catlover.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I never said it was.

Well good. Now maybe someone will chime in
with some other alternatives.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:45 GMT
> > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
> > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> cat food that lists "meat" and not "meat byproducts" as the first
> ingredient, then? Is that your assessment?

Yes.  However, meat by-products aren't necessarily a bad thing - meat
by-products generally contain more nutrients than skeletal meat.  Cats eat
animal by-products when they consume a mouse.

And if this is true, and
> one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe
> one might use ANY such cat food that has meat as a first ingredient
> and dose the cat with urine acidifier?

Basically, yes.  But I would still avoid brands with high phosphorus levels
and low protein to ash ratios.

Only I believe you wrote that
> what Megan recommended is NOT safe. Correct?

As I said, adding an acidifier to an acidified diet is risky business -
*but* if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, you don't have much of a
choice. In such cases, the benefits outweigh the risks - since the
consequences of urethral obstruction are oliguric renal failure and death or
permanent damage to the urethra.

Phil
Mary - 13 Mar 2005 17:52 GMT
> > > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
> > > > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
> by-products generally contain more nutrients than skeletal meat.  Cats eat
> animal by-products when they consume a mouse.

I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that
"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from
an anthropomorphic angle.

> And if this is true, and
> > one's cat will not eat Hill's prescription s/d, then IF it were safe
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Phil

Thanks.

Okay, so summing up: Hill's Prescription s/d is the best thing for cats
that have had urinary tract problems, in particular blockages. If the
cat really will not eat this, then any cat food that has a low phosphorus
level and a low ash level (high protein low ash) can be used and
possibly supplemented with a urine acidifier such as Methioform--IF
the vet advises that this is okay.
Meghan Noecker - 14 Mar 2005 09:05 GMT
>I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that
>"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from
>an anthropomorphic angle.

Quite possible. My nephew's cat won't eat chicken or steak, but he
will eat a mouse. I guess those byproducts add more flavor.

Signature

--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew  
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

Mary - 14 Mar 2005 18:58 GMT
> >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that
> >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from
> >an anthropomorphic angle.
>
> Quite possible. My nephew's cat won't eat chicken or steak, but he
> will eat a mouse. I guess those byproducts add more flavor.

Yep. And where does taurine come from, I wonder, that it
is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs
and bones and toenails and stuff? ;)
Steve G - 14 Mar 2005 22:16 GMT
(...)

> Yep. And where does taurine come from, I wonder, that it
> is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs
> and bones and toenails and stuff? ;)

Not hair, nor eyeballs, nor toenails.

IIRC it's most concentrated in the central nervous system, heart and
striate muscle.

S.
Mary - 15 Mar 2005 00:30 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> IIRC it's most concentrated in the central nervous system, heart and
> striate muscle.

Thanks Steve. I was just looking at a site about that. It comes
from animals, just not all animals.
Phil P. - 14 Mar 2005 23:24 GMT
> > >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that
> > >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is not present in tuna? Does it come from hair and eyeballs
> and bones and toenails and stuff? ;)

You're partly right. Retinas contain high concentrations of free taurine.
Most other animal tissues, particularly muscle, heart (also a muscle),
viscera and brain - and shellfish, also contain high levels of taurine.
Plants don't contain any.

Most animals are able to synthesize enough taurine from methionine and
cysteine to meet their needs.  However, cats have a limited capacity to
synthesize taurine and must receive it preformed - just like vitamin A (cats
can't convert beta carotene

Before 1986, many cats suffered from Feline Central Retinal Degeneration and
a form of dilated cardiomypoathy (taurine-deficient dilated
cardiomyopathy-TD-DCM) because the cat's taurine requirements were not known
and  taurine was not supplemented in cat foods.  After 1987, feline diets
were fortified with taurine and both diseases all but disappeared.   Along
with insufficient protein, the lack of taurine is another reason why dog
food should not be fed to cats.

Phil.
Mary - 15 Mar 2005 00:44 GMT
> > > >I have often wondered if the people who keep saying that
> > > >"meat" is better than "meat byproducts" are talking from
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> with insufficient protein, the lack of taurine is another reason why dog
> food should not be fed to cats.

It's nice to know that good work in cat nutrition continues to be done.
Phil P. - 14 Mar 2005 23:17 GMT
> > > > > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness
> that
[quoted text clipped - 118 lines]
> possibly supplemented with a urine acidifier such as Methioform--IF
> the vet advises that this is okay.

A few pet food manufacturers make struvite diets so there's a good chance
the cat will accept at least one of them -- that's if the owner at least
offers them to the cat.  Also, there are ways to enhance the flavor of
struvite diets without altering their effectiveness. Acidifiers should be
the last resort.

Phil
-L. - 13 Mar 2005 09:17 GMT
> > Phil mentioned several fruits and vegetables that are in Wellness that
> > surprised me. I did not mean to say that a large percentage of
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> whether the diet actually contains more meat than plant material without
> seeing the actual formula - which no pet food company will make public.

This is true of most cat foods, though, isn't it?  I don't think I know
of a cat food where the third, fourth or 5th ingredient isn't
plant-based (as well as subsequent ingredients).  And considering the
price of cranberries and blueberries (especially), I doubt the last 5
ingredients are in very high concentration.

Bottom line is, you have to feed your cats what works - and Welness is
certainly better than a lot of cat foods on the market.

IIRC Methioform was prescribed for cats long before foods that "promote
healthy urinary tract pH" were on the market (I remember using it in
the 70's).  I'm not saying it's an *ideal* way to ensure no more FUS,
but under a vet's care, it certainly is one option that is viable,
especially if you have a finicky cat that will only eat certain foods.

-L.
Phil P. - 13 Mar 2005 10:48 GMT
And considering the
> price of cranberries and blueberries (especially), I doubt the last 5
> ingredients are in very high concentration.

If you're correct, then their presence is designed to create an
anthropomorphic appeal rather than provide any nutritional value. I don't
have a problem with that type of marketing gimmick since it wasn't a factor
in my decision for choosing Wellness.  The nutrient levels are close enough
to my preferences.

> Bottom line is, you have to feed your cats what works - and Welness is
> certainly better than a lot of cat foods on the market.

Absolutely.  Wellness is a component of my cats' rotating diet.

> IIRC Methioform was prescribed for cats long before foods that "promote
> healthy urinary tract pH" were on the market (I remember using it in
> the 70's).  I'm not saying it's an *ideal* way to ensure no more FUS,
> but under a vet's care, it certainly is one option that is viable,
> especially if you have a finicky cat that will only eat certain foods.

As I said, if the cat won't eat a prescription diet, then you don't have
much of a choice.  In such cases, the benefits of an acidifier certainly
outweigh the risks - since the consequences of urethral obstruction are
oliguric acute renal failure and possibly death or permanent damage to the
urethra.

Phil