Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / January 2005
Mixing Rice with Canned Cat Food
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Randabana - 11 Jan 2005 15:34 GMT I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says they are healthy but could lose a pound or two.
Does anyone have any experience with adding cooked rice to canned food? How much rice is enough - what's the correct ratio rice/cat food?
Currently I am giving them Science Diet Adult canned food.
dragon - 11 Jan 2005 15:47 GMT I don't see how adding rice, a starch *very* high in carbohydrates, would do anything to help a cat lose weight! It would probably cause them to gain weight. If you're going to add rice, it should be brown rice (whole grain) but even then I can't see how it would benefit. I would suggest that you purchase a high-quality, reduced calorie, CAT FOOD for your cats.
dragon
TCS - 11 Jan 2005 15:55 GMT >I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says >they are healthy but could lose a pound or two.
>Does anyone have any experience with adding cooked rice to canned >food? How much rice is enough - what's the correct ratio rice/cat >food? Rice is filler. You might as well feed them sawdust.
What canned food are you mixing with filler? Do they have a formula for older/fat/lazy cats? I've put kitties on that stuff when they were only a year old if they did more eating than running around.
Rene S. - 11 Jan 2005 16:03 GMT I've learned a lot about cat nutrition since I've started Tucker on a diet. I don't know that rice will help them--cats don't need carbohydrates in their diet. I have (slowly!) cut back on food and will add more water and mix it in to make up for the difference.
Perhaps Megan will post--she knows far more than I do. But basically you need to determine their daily calorie needs. Here's a web site with the calorie information for many canned foods: http://www.sugarcats.net/sites/jmpeerson/canfood.html
Rene
PawsForThought - 11 Jan 2005 16:13 GMT >From: Randabana mkallan-remthis@comcast.net
>I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says >they are healthy but could lose a pound or two. > >Does anyone have any experience with adding cooked rice to canned >food? How much rice is enough - what's the correct ratio rice/cat >food? I would not recommend adding rice to your cats' food as it may upset the nutritional balance. A better way to help your cats lose weight would be to get them more active by using interactive toys with them, and finding a food that is more nutrient dense so you wouldn't have to feed as much. I think Hill's even makes a food that is supposed to help in weight loss if you wanted to stick with that brand. Or, you might want to find a brand that has less carbs, something like Wellness.
Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Jim Lawton - 11 Jan 2005 16:14 GMT >I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says >they are healthy but could lose a pound or two. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Currently I am giving them Science Diet Adult canned food. As far as I recall, rice in cat food is usually for when the animal needs a reduced *protein* diet.
Jim
Monique Y. Mudama - 11 Jan 2005 16:55 GMT > I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says they > are healthy but could lose a pound or two. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Currently I am giving them Science Diet Adult canned food. According to my vet, cat hunger doesn't work the same way as human hunger. While we want to stop eating when we're full, they want to stop eating when they get enough of certain nutrients, like fat and protein. By adding more carbs to their diet, you will just make them want to eat more to get enough of those nutrients.
Have you checked with your vet to find out if you are feeding them the right amount of canned food? I wouldn't just go shrinking their portions unless you're sure they'll still get enough food, but maybe you're feeding them too much.
I agree with whoever suggested more playtime. My cat isn't a big fan of most toys, but for $4 I got a "cat dancer" toy that my cat adores, so I can finally get her butt off the couch!
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Steve G - 12 Jan 2005 02:20 GMT > According to my vet, cat hunger doesn't work the same way as human hunger. > While we want to stop eating when we're full, they want to stop eating when > they get enough of certain nutrients, like fat and protein. And that's why there are no overweight cats.
Er...
True that cats do have receptors in the intestine that respond to amino acids, and these receptors probably mediate satiety (indeed, the receptors project to areas of the brain that are associated with satiety). Incidentally, humans also have amino acid receptors in the gut, and humans do show amino acid-induced satiety - just like cats.
However, in reality, palatability can totally overwhelm any inherent tendency for cats to feel sated at the 'correct' level.
(...)
> I wouldn't just go shrinking their portions unless > you're sure they'll still get enough food, Eh? Just cut the intake by a small amount (say 10%) and keep track of the cat's weight. It's not rocket science.
> but maybe you're feeding them too much. If they are fat, they are being fed too much.
> I agree with whoever suggested more playtime. My cat isn't a big fan of most > toys, but for $4 I got a "cat dancer" toy that my cat adores, so I can finally > get her butt off the couch! A good idea. Plus, as others have suggested, the OP could swap to SD Light (or another food with fewer kcal per can).
Steve.
Monique Y. Mudama - 12 Jan 2005 02:50 GMT >> According to my vet, cat hunger doesn't work the same way as human >> hunger. While we want to stop eating when we're full, they want to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Er... And no overweight humans ...
I was trying to explain why adding rice to the cats' food wouldn't necessarily accomplish the goal. Do you disagree with that?
Actually, I can't even imagine my cat eating rice. But some cats are less picky.
> True that cats do have receptors in the intestine that respond to > amino acids, and these receptors probably mediate satiety (indeed, the > receptors project to areas of the brain that are associated with > satiety). Incidentally, humans also have amino acid receptors in the > gut, and humans do show amino acid-induced satiety - just like cats. It doesn't surprise me that we have them. I wonder if our bodies use them the same way cats do.
> However, in reality, palatability can totally overwhelm any inherent > tendency for cats to feel sated at the 'correct' level. Sure, which is why I don't feed Oscar treats instead of meals. Maybe I'm just "lucky" ... Oscar will eventually eat most cat foods, but she's yet to find a cat food, wet or dry, that she'll just devour till it's all gone.
She did, however, lose a small amount of weight when I switched her from dry to wet; enough that she went from being just a smidge high to being about right.
> (...) >> I wouldn't just go shrinking their portions unless you're sure >> they'll still get enough food, > > Eh? Just cut the intake by a small amount (say 10%) and keep track of > the cat's weight. It's not rocket science. People are notorious for exercising poor judgement about food. Also, weight isn't the only way to guage health, as I'm sure you know. In fact, weight as an isolated number is pretty much meaningless.
Granted, I did take Oscar down from 1 can a day to 2/3 per day, but that was after it was quite clear that she wasn't eating anywhere close to the full can. She's not even eating all of what I give her, now. But if you asked me to reduce that serving by 10%, I wouldn't be able to guage it without a scale.
>> but maybe you're feeding them too much. > If they are fat, they are being fed too much. (Or they are exercising too little and eating the right amount.)
> A good idea. Plus, as others have suggested, the OP could swap to SD > Light (or another food with fewer kcal per can). I've heard mixed reports on these. Some animals even gain weight on these foods. I wouldn't say not to try it, but to pay close attention.
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Cheryl - 12 Jan 2005 03:07 GMT > Actually, I can't even imagine my cat eating rice. But some > cats are less picky. You might be surprised. There are a lot of cat foods out there that are "chicken and rice" formulated. You can see the rice grains in it, whole. Also, in bland diets for certain illnesses they recommend home cooked recipes with chicken, rice (brown, whole grain), vitamins, taurine and calcium additives. Two canned cats foods I can think of right off the top of my head where you can see the whole rice grains is Felidae Chicken and Rice, and Pro Plan Chicken and Rice (and Salmon and Rice for that matter). There was one that Shamrock just LOVED but I can't find it any more. Petreet Chicken and Rice and Tuna and Rice.
 Signature Cheryl
Monique Y. Mudama - 12 Jan 2005 03:14 GMT >> Actually, I can't even imagine my cat eating rice. But some cats are less >> picky. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > was one that Shamrock just LOVED but I can't find it any more. Petreet > Chicken and Rice and Tuna and Rice. I'm sure they exist. I just have trouble imagining my cat eating it =P
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
ceb - 12 Jan 2005 13:54 GMT Cheryl <jlhshadow@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in news:Xns95DBE10DF2B4Bshads@ 216.196.97.136:
> You might be surprised. There are a lot of cat foods out there that > are "chicken and rice" formulated. You can see the rice grains in it, > whole. Rosalie will eat around the rice, leaving all the little grains of rice while consuming most of the meat. It's actually kind of hilarious.
--Catherine & Rosalie the calico
Steve G - 12 Jan 2005 16:57 GMT (...)
> I was trying to explain why adding rice to the cats' food wouldn't necessarily > accomplish the goal. Do you disagree with that? No, I agree - should have been more clear, sorry. Indeed, I would say that all else being equal, adding rice is likely to be a bad thing in almost every way. I was really just making the point that although cats (and humans, rats, pygmy lemurs too, no doubt) nominally eat to meet their nutritional requirements, this is pretty meaningless in the realities of everyday life.
> Actually, I can't even imagine my cat eating rice. But some cats are less > picky. Newman's Own food contains rice, and I'm sure other 'premium' foods do too. Having said that, the rice isn't 'added' post hoc, it was part of the formulation.
Pickyness: One of my cats has been know to snarf potatoes, tortilla chips, olives, cheese, cooked rice, curry, and recently he was standing on my shoulder while I was eating a blueberry waffle and decided to take a bite out the toasty goodness, the little bugger.
(...)
> > satiety). Incidentally, humans also have amino acid receptors in the > > gut, and humans do show amino acid-induced satiety - just like cats. > > It doesn't surprise me that we have them. I wonder if our bodies use them the > same way cats do. The receptors? Well, they do seem to play a role in satiety, as they do in the cat. In terms of the details, I don't think anyone knows *exactly* what the receptors do, or at least what the brain does with the signal from the receptors.
(...)
> > Eh? Just cut the intake by a small amount (say 10%) and keep track of > > the cat's weight. It's not rocket science. > > People are notorious for exercising poor judgement about food. Yeah, but a 10% (or whatever) reduction doesn't need judgment - if uncertain, just measure it! I.e., if you feed 7 scoops of Arsey Chunks, now feed 6.3 instead.
IMO it's easiest if you feed a mix of wet and dry food because you can juggle things so that you have nice round amounts to remember. E.g., Swap from half a can of Stinking Nastyness, to one-quarter of a can of Stinking Nastyness and 1 scoop of Foul Bites, which leads to a 10% reduction in kcal fed.
> Also, weight > isn't the only way to guage health, as I'm sure you know. In fact, weight as > an isolated number is pretty much meaningless. Sure, one 6lb cat could be lardy, and another 20lb cat could be uderweight. But the owner sees the cat and the weight is meaningful for that cat.
> Granted, I did take Oscar down from 1 can a day to 2/3 per day, but that was > after it was quite clear that she wasn't eating anywhere close to the full > can. She's not even eating all of what I give her, now. But if you asked me > to reduce that serving by 10%, I wouldn't be able to guage it without a scale. Then use a scale! It is easier with dry foods, perhaps. Or as I suggested above, easier with a mix of wet and dry foods.
Another method is to look at the kcal of the food currently being fed, and then choose to feed a different food, one with fewer kcal. (This assumes that the cat doesn't only eat Arsey Chunks, and turns her nose up at Scummy Niblets).
> >> but maybe you're feeding them too much. > > If they are fat, they are being fed too much. > > (Or they are exercising too little and eating the right amount.) Bottom line - if they are fat, they are being fed too much. Doesn't matter if they are being fed the correct amount for that cat if it were to get some exercise. Point is, the cat isn't getting some exercise. Too much is too much.
> > A good idea. Plus, as others have suggested, the OP could swap to SD > > Light (or another food with fewer kcal per can). > > I've heard mixed reports on these. Some animals even gain weight on these > foods. I wouldn't say not to try it, but to pay close attention. If you feed the same amount, but of a lower kcal density food, the cat *will* lose weight. (Well, unless it decreases its activity accordingly). In the end, kcal fed vs kcal used in the whole story. Steve.
Monique Y. Mudama - 12 Jan 2005 20:46 GMT > No, I agree - should have been more clear, sorry. Indeed, I would say that > all else being equal, adding rice is likely to be a bad thing in almost > every way. I was really just making the point that although cats (and > humans, rats, pygmy lemurs too, no doubt) nominally eat to meet their > nutritional requirements, this is pretty meaningless in the realities of > everyday life. Well, I wonder. Oscar has eaten as much dry food as she wants since I got her at eight weeks. She always had a few kibbles at a time, but never chowed down.
Well, after some reading on this newsgroup and a talk with my vet, I switched her to canned food. I started her on half a can of Wellness twice a day, but she didn't eat nearly that much, so after a few weeks I reduced her portions to a third of a can of Wellness twice a day. She *still* doesn't finish it. But she has lost weight; she dropped from 9lb 13oz to 9lb 6oz in a little over a month. That seems like a safe rate of loss, although I'm definitely keeping an eye on her eating habits. I don't think she should lose any more; she's about right as is.
Even now that she regards dry food as a treat, she doesn't go nuts. She has an ulcer on her lip and I couldn't tell if she was eating any of her wet food, so I counted out some kibbles. She got right to them, but after three she stopped. Even when she likes the food, she stops eating before it's gone.
As I look at this, I see a cat who stops eating before her bowl is empty. She does this with both wet and dry food, and yet she lost some unnecessary weight on wet. The only interpretation I can manage is that she gets full on fewer calories when eating canned food than when eating dry. Is there something I'm missing?
> Pickyness: One of my cats has been know to snarf potatoes, tortilla chips, > olives, cheese, cooked rice, curry, and recently he was standing on my > shoulder while I was eating a blueberry waffle and decided to take a bite > out the toasty goodness, the little bugger. Sometimes, I wish my cat were more adventurous about people food, but then I remind myself that I purposely tried *not* to feed her the treats to which my dog was so accustomed, so that she wouldn't beg ...
> IMO it's easiest if you feed a mix of wet and dry food because you can > juggle things so that you have nice round amounts to remember. E.g., Swap > from half a can of Stinking Nastyness, to one-quarter of a can of Stinking > Nastyness and 1 scoop of Foul Bites, which leads to a 10% reduction in kcal > fed. Maybe so. As I've mentioned, Oscar rarely finishes what she's given, so I've never had to restrict her food to keep her from getting fat.
>> Also, weight isn't the only way to guage health, as I'm sure you >> know. In fact, weight as an isolated number is pretty much [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > uderweight. But the owner sees the cat and the weight is meaningful > for that cat. I was speaking more of fat vs. muscle. And I'm speaking from the perspective of human weight loss. It's amazing how many times a person (particularly a female-type person, as my dad would say) will get frustrated with an exercise program and quit because they weighed themselves and they're either not losing weight or actually gaining. Of course, they've lost two inches on their belt, but they're so fixated on the weight ...
So, all I'm saying is, fat isn't the only thing that contributes to weight.
>> (Or they are exercising too little and eating the right amount.) > > Bottom line - if they are fat, they are being fed too much. Doesn't matter > if they are being fed the correct amount for that cat if it were to get some > exercise. Point is, the cat isn't getting some exercise. Too much is too > much. Sure, but I'd wager that it's better for the cat's health to increase the amount of exercise. Couch potato lifestyles are no better for cats than for humans, I'd think.
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Steve G - 12 Jan 2005 22:13 GMT (...)
> As I look at this, I see a cat who stops eating before her bowl is empty. She > does this with both wet and dry food, and yet she lost some unnecessary weight > on wet. The only interpretation I can manage is that she gets full on fewer > calories when eating canned food than when eating dry. Is there something I'm > missing? No. Remember that wet food is much less calorie-dense than dry food. So, the stomach gets more full when eating a certain number of kcal from wet food as opposed to dry. Also, I would expect a stronger amino-acid based satiety signal from wet food as opposed to dry. I exaggerated a bit when I suggested some satiety signals are basically meaningless, but plenty of cats do get fat eating wet food, and remember that c.30-40% of pet cats in the US are overweight. A huge minority of cats are obviously eating far more than they need. Satiety cues be damned!
(...)
> Sometimes, I wish my cat were more adventurous about people food, but then I > remind myself that I purposely tried *not* to feed her the treats to which my > dog was so accustomed, so that she wouldn't beg ... Ah, you miss the great joy of letting your cat lick empty yoghurt cartons. That's the joy of said cat getting his head stuck in the carton, and then walking backwards for 20 feet waving his front paws in the air until the carton falls off. Rinse and repeat. He eventually learned to just stand in one place and pull the carton off his fizzog with his paws, so I don't get as much amusement as I used to.
(...)
> > Sure, one 6lb cat could be lardy, and another 20lb cat could be > > uderweight. But the owner sees the cat and the weight is meaningful [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > weight or actually gaining. Of course, they've lost two inches on their belt, > but they're so fixated on the weight ... Yes, bang on.
(...)
> Sure, but I'd wager that it's better for the cat's health to increase the > amount of exercise. Couch potato lifestyles are no better for cats than for > humans, I'd think. Bang on #2. As long as the cat is willing to play, and the owner is willing to run around the house dragging a piece of string, the exercise route is the best. Just like in humans. Er, well I don't suggest humans chase a piece of string for exercise - it will confuse the cat.
S.
Monique Y. Mudama - 13 Jan 2005 00:06 GMT > No. Remember that wet food is much less calorie-dense than dry food. So, > the stomach gets more full when eating a certain number of kcal from wet [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > are overweight. A huge minority of cats are obviously eating far more than > they need. Satiety cues be damned! Wet food is *less* calorie-dense than dry? So there are more calories in a given volume of dry than wet?
So you're saying she's eating the same amount (nutrients be damned) and getting fewer calories from it? Just trying to be clear.
I'm not sure that Oscar would listen to her tummy-full signals if she were presented with, say, a full can of tuna. But I've never actually tested this theory; she just gets a forkful or so.
> Ah, you miss the great joy of letting your cat lick empty yoghurt cartons. > That's the joy of said cat getting his head stuck in the carton, and then > walking backwards for 20 feet waving his front paws in the air until the > carton falls off. Rinse and repeat. He eventually learned to just stand in > one place and pull the carton off his fizzog with his paws, so I don't get > as much amusement as I used to. Oscar would have shot around the house like a rocket, and it would have taken me half an hour to get her to sit still for me to remove the thing, and another few hours before she'd calm down. She's a bit ... excitable =P
I do eat yoghurt, so I've thought about letting her try some. Haven't gotten around to it yet, though. And I hear a lot of cats are lactose intolerant?
> Bang on #2. As long as the cat is willing to play, and the owner is willing > to run around the house dragging a piece of string, the exercise route is > the best. Just like in humans. Er, well I don't suggest humans chase a piece > of string for exercise - it will confuse the cat. I imagine the cat would get a similar expression to a teenager who sees their mom in "youthful" clothing. "Mooooooooom, you're EMBARRASSING me!"
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 02:10 GMT > Wet food is *less* calorie-dense than dry? So there are more calories in a > given volume of dry than wet? Only for those who don't know how to compare canned and dry foods on an equal dry matter basis. Dry and canned food cannot be compared even up because of the drastic differences in moisture content. Canned food is more nutrient and caloric dense than dry food when compared on an equal dry matter basis.
For example, I just happened to have Nutro's proximate analysis sheets for Nutro Max Cat Adult Dry and Max Cat Chicken & Lamb canned:
Dry: Kcal/lb = 1920 DMB Can: Kcal/lb = 2229 DMB
Dry: Protein g/1000 Kcal: 87.16 DMB Can: Protein g/1000 Kcal: 96.82 DMB
Dry: Fat g/1000 Kcal = 47.68 Can: Fat g/1000 Kcal = 70.35
Dry: Carbohydrate g/1000 Kcal = 82.77 Can: Carbohydrate g/1000 Kcal = 18.06
Kcal/g: Can = 4.92 Kcal/g: Dry = 4.23
Here's how you compare energy and nutrient density between dry and canned food:
http://maxshouse.com/feline_nutrition.htm#Dry Matter
Phil
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 14:54 GMT > Wet food is *less* calorie-dense than dry? So there are more calories in a > given volume of dry than wet? > > So you're saying she's eating the same amount (nutrients be damned) and > getting fewer calories from it? Just trying to be clear. No. She's getting more kcals from canned -- but they're "better" i.e, more useable kcals. Cats are adapted to using fat more efficiently than carbs.
For example, (using Nutro's proximate analysis per 1000 kcal), she's getting ~300 kcal from carbs from the dry frood and only ~60 kcals from carbs from the canned food. Although she's getting more kcals from fat (~600) from the canned than dry food (~405), she utilizes the fat more efficiently.
Of 1000 kcals dry food, ~712 kcals are from carbs and fat whereas in canned food, ~660 kcals come from fat and carbs.
In daily energy, that translates into burning ~12 grams (42 kcals) carbs before she even begins metabolizing fat for energy (which is what cats naturally use for energy). Now, if you have a superactive intact cat, burning 12 grams of carbs isn't so bad - but for the majority of owned neutered, moderately active, indoor cats, burning 12 grams or 42 kcals, ain't easy.
Reports say between 25%-30% of pet cats are overweight or obese. That's probably because most of them eat dry food as their main diet.
Phil.
 Signature If you are worthy of her affection, a cat will be your friend but never your slave. --Theophile Gautier Feline Healthcare & More: www.maxshouse.com
Steve G - 13 Jan 2005 18:21 GMT > > Wet food is *less* calorie-dense than dry? So there are more calories in > > a given volume of dry than wet? > > No. She's getting more kcals from canned -- but they're "better" i.e, more > useable kcals. Cats are adapted to using fat more efficiently than carbs. Incorrect. Remember, the question was 'are there more colories in a given VOLUME of dry than wet'. Some numbers (in the following, the dry food is SD Nature's Best, and the wet is SD Beef, values from the Hill's web site):
Dry: 420kcal /3.6oz, which occupies a volume of 8floz (236ml). 1ml of dry = 1.77kcal
Wet: 444kcal/404g can which occupies a volume of ~595ml. 1ml of wet = 0.75kcal
For a given *volume*, the calorie density of dry is much greater. So, if you feed 1 'scoop' of dry, it will have more calories than 1 'scoop' of wet.
(...)
> Reports say between 25%-30% of pet cats are overweight or obese. That's > probably because most of them eat dry food as their main diet. Sure, it's a least one factor that contributes to the high incidence of obesity. However, as well as containing fewer (species-appropriate) nutrients in a given volume, dry food is also very calorie dense. So, satiety cues are almost certainly weaker for dry food - and that's both nutrient-based satiety (e.g., amino-acid based satiety), and stomach-distention based satiety. A double whammy.
Now, before you deny that stomach based mechanisms have any part to play in satiety (as I suspect you might), I'll point out that numerous studies have shown that such mechanisms are important. For example, Schick et al. (1989; Am J Physiol 256: R248-R254) have shown that a cholecystokinin-based satiety mechanism is triggered by stomach distention in the cat. They also show that the mechanism is likely due to stomach distention per se, and does not require stomach distention due to a meal. Another satiety mechanism involving bombesin has also been suggested as being tied to stomach distention (Bado et al., 1989; Am J Physiol 256: R181-R186):
'We suggest that the [bombesin] suppressive effect on food intake is mediated by its effect on gastric emptying and consequently on gastric distention' (pp. R185).
There's a nice intro in Michel (2001; J Fel Med Surg 3: 3-8) that briefly and clearly indicates how complex feeding behaviour really is. Another quote from the intro:
'Distention of the GI tract, in particular the stomach and duodenum, signals satiety, while the nutrient content of the ingesta appears to be the more important stimulus for cessation of intake at the level of the small intestine'. (pp. 3).
Feeding behaviour isn't about nutrient content OR stomach distention OR palatability - it's about ALL of these things and more. And the combination of all of these factors means that dry food is especially crappy given that it falls flat on its fizzog at each hurdle.
Steve.
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 18:57 GMT > > > Wet food is *less* calorie-dense than dry? So there are more > calories in [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Incorrect. LOL! No, I don't think so....
Remember, the question was 'are there more colories in a
> given VOLUME of dry than wet'. Stevie boy, your little pecker complex is showing again. What did I tell you about that?
Steve G - 13 Jan 2005 19:24 GMT (...)
> LOL! No, I don't think so.... So, you think there's an error here:
Dry: 420kcal /3.6oz, which occupies a volume of 8floz (236ml). 1ml of dry = 1.77kcal
Wet: 444kcal/404g can which occupies a volume of ~595ml. 1ml of wet = 0.75kcal
Feel free to point it out.
> Remember, the question was 'are there more colories in a > > given VOLUME of dry than wet'. > > Stevie boy, your little pecker complex is showing again. > What did I tell you about that? I have no idea Phil. Maybe you told me to stop ramming it up your arse?
Mind you, 'little pecker complex' seems to translate as 'you disagree with me and I don't like it'. So, while you are directing insults at me, perhaps you could throw some the way of the nutrition researchers who have demonstrated that multiple factors are important in satiety (aka 'cats eat to meet their nutritional needs' is simplistic at best). Maybe you could e-mail Schick et al. and call them a bunch of monkey-sucking fucksticks with tiny tadgers?
If you have anything substantial to add - you know, based on science or other worthwhole evidence - then feel free. Otherwise, your bullets don't penetrate paper.
S.
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 20:19 GMT > (...) > > > > LOL! No, I don't think so.... > > So, you think there's an error here: Yeah... You need to learn how to compare dry food to canned food on a dry matter basis. Not my rule.. its just the way it is... LOL!
Steve G - 13 Jan 2005 20:43 GMT (...)
> Yeah... You need to learn how to compare dry food to canned food on > a dry matter basis. Hm, you're not quite getting this, are you? Or possibly you see the point, but just refuse to admit it. Anyway, I shall bang my pecker against the wall one last (?) time...
DMB values are used to compare different foods, so that they are compared on a level playing field, if you will.
However, when it comes to feeding, the volume matters. So, feed 100kcal of wet food and the cat will have eaten a larger *volume* of food than if you fed 100kcal of dry. It is well known that the volume of food in the stomach is important in mediating satiety (re. the references I gave above, and more if you're interested), and so the volume is important to keep in mind. Again, from Michel (2001):
'Meal termination is primarily influenced by post-ingestional stimuli such as *gastric distention* or nutrient absorption' (emphasis added)
Basically, thinking in terms of DMV is overly simplistic when considering satiety. It's fine if you want some basis upon which to compare different foods though.
In fact, if you consider the part of the equation that says 'cats eat to meet their nutritional needs' then it is obvious that they will eat more, in volumetric terms, of dry food than wet to meet those needs. And then we're back onto the gastric distention bus (burp).
HTH, Steve.
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 20:49 GMT > (...) > > > > Yeah... You need to learn how to compare dry food to canned food on > > a dry matter basis. > > Hm, you're not quite getting this, are you? Oh, I'm getting it perfectly.... You need to learn how to compare dry food to canned food on a dry matter basis. I don't think you're getting it....
Liz - 13 Jan 2005 21:29 GMT > Now, before you deny that stomach based mechanisms have any part to > play in satiety (as I suspect you might), I'll point out that numerous [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Steve. You expect Phil to get this? LOL Happy 2005 to everyone!
Liz
Phil P. - 13 Jan 2005 21:42 GMT > You expect Phil to get this? LOL Wow! The bimbo who can dissolve calcium oxalate uroliths in cats with *water* (LOL) slid out from under her rock after all this time! Gee, I thought you would have dissolved by now!
Liz - 15 Jan 2005 23:13 GMT LOL, that was funny... Actually, I might melt cuz the heat down here is unbearable. Bet you´d like that huh? hehe So, still feeding Science Corn to your kitties?
Liz
PawsForThought - 13 Jan 2005 03:11 GMT >From: "Steve G" news@stevethepsycho.co.uk
>Also, I would expect a stronger >amino-acid based satiety signal from wet food as opposed to dry. I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >minority of cats are obviously eating far more than they need. Satiety >cues be damned! I believe most pet foods have flavor enhancers to entice the pet to eat the food and that could very well be why so many pets are overweight.
Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Steve G - 13 Jan 2005 20:45 GMT (...)
> I believe most pet foods have flavor enhancers to entice the pet to eat the > food and that could very well be why so many pets are overweight. Yes, absolutely. Satiety is determined by lots of things, and palatability is a very important component.
Steve.
Phil P. - 12 Jan 2005 22:32 GMT > Well, after some reading on this newsgroup and a talk with my vet, I > switched her to canned food. I started her on half a can of Wellness [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 9lb 13oz to 9lb 6oz in a little over a month. That seems like a safe > rate of loss, It is. Allow no more than 1 pound every 4 weeks.
although I'm definitely keeping an eye on her eating habits. I
> don't think she should lose any more; she's about right as is. Wellness Beef & Chicken, for example, contains 198 kcal/can (according to Wellness). 2/3 of a can contains about 130 kcal. Her daily energy requirement is about 45 kcal/kg or about 180 kcal/day. If she's not very active her DER is probably less - 40 kcal/kg/day.
Since cats eat to meet their energy needs and she doesn't finish her portion, I can think of two possibilities: The food contains more kcal than advertised thus she's meeting her energy needs with less food; or her energy needs are less than estimated for a cat at her weight. Both explain her satiety after a small portion.
If she weighed 4.5 kg and was about 20% overweight, her lean body mass would be about 3.6 kg and her DER would be about 144 kcal/day. You've been feeding her about 130 kcal/day, right? That's very close. The minor difference can probably be accounted for in variations from the original formula and the caloric content of the food.
Take a look at the Body Scoring chart on my site - where would you say she's at?
http://www.maxshouse.com/nutrition/Body_Scoring_System-Chart.jpg
Phil
Monique Y. Mudama - 12 Jan 2005 22:57 GMT > Wellness Beef & Chicken, for example, contains 198 kcal/can (according to > Wellness). 2/3 of a can contains about 130 kcal. Her daily energy > requirement is about 45 kcal/kg or about 180 kcal/day. If she's not very > active her DER is probably less - 40 kcal/kg/day. She's not terribly active, although she gets the occasional zoomies and will dart around like mad. That's once every few days or a week, though, not a few times a day.
I've been getting the cans by the pallet, so she's been getting one flavor at a time. She seems to like the seafood stuff best, so that's what she's been getting; I don't see either of the flavors on the OMH site, though, oddly enough.
She adores the cat dancer and will play with that a lot, but she currently has an ulcer on her lip, and while it doesn't seem to cause her any discomfort, I don't want her chewing on the dancer constantly.
> Since cats eat to meet their energy needs and she doesn't finish her > portion, I can think of two possibilities: The food contains more kcal than [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://www.maxshouse.com/nutrition/Body_Scoring_System-Chart.jpg Well, she's a long hair, so it can be a bit hard to guage. When holding and petting her, it is obvious where her ribs end and her waist begins. I can tell she has ribs, but they're not sticking out. I can now just barely feel her backbone, but it's not sticking out. My overall impression is that she has gone from having just a bit of extra on her to being about right. She's definitely not "heavy" according to that chart. I'd call her "ideal" at this point. Again, though, the long fur can make it tricky. And belly contact is not a welcomed activity. If I donned enough protective gear to safely approach her belly, I wouldn't be able to tell what I was feeling.
I really switched her in the hopes that wet food would be better for her health than dry, despite the fact that she's had no health problems (till this lip thing). And in fact, it seems (granted, this is subjective) that she's more alert and energetic now than she was on dry food. She's playful and frisky and, well, kittenish. I know that I experience a similar change of behavior when I eat well (reasonable fat content, enough veggies, etc), so it makes intuitive sense to me that a better diet would produce a more youthful, energetic cat.
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Cheryl - 12 Jan 2005 23:25 GMT On Wed 12 Jan 2005 05:32:55p, Phil P. wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav (news:bdidnVmdaIJ9OHjcRVn- qQ@giganews.com):
> http://www.maxshouse.com/nutrition/Body_Scoring_System-Chart.jpg Where would one fit who looks in the ideal range WRT the waist, but her "hips" feel a little boney? I'm so used to having cats that are a bit on the heavy side, and then there was Shadow, and I'm having a hard time telling if Scarlett, the kitten, is really as tiny as I think she is.
 Signature Cheryl
Randabana - 12 Jan 2005 03:32 GMT Thanks for all your advice. It doesn't look like rice is a good idea.
Well if I just leave the food out, they would eat it until it's gone, and cry for more 4 hours later. I feed each of them a rounded teaspoon of Hills gourmet canned entre when I wake up. After that about two-third of a cup of dried IAMS tartar control spread out in three times for the rest of the day. Total a rounded teasspoon of canned and two thirds of a cup of dry each. I add water to the dry food. I don't soak it. I just put it on top of a little water.
I can't leave a day's food out because the younger male (2 yrs) will eat it all. The older female (3 yrs) will take so so long to decide if this is really food and then does really want to eat it.
>> According to my vet, cat hunger doesn't work the same way as human >hunger. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > >Steve. Karen Chuplis - 12 Jan 2005 04:26 GMT > Thanks for all your advice. It doesn't look like rice is a good idea. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > eat it all. The older female (3 yrs) will take so so long to decide > if this is really food and then does really want to eat it. You should try switching to majority wet food with dry as a treat. That would help weight.
Monique Y. Mudama - 12 Jan 2005 05:01 GMT > You should try switching to majority wet food with dry as a treat. That > would help weight. This is what I have done, and she has lost weight.
 Signature monique, roommate of Oscar the (female) grouch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eros was adopted! Eros has a home now! *cheer!*
Kate - 12 Jan 2005 14:26 GMT Hill`s Senior canned cat food has whole, white rice in it, if that is anything to go by.
Kate
Mrschief44 - 11 Jan 2005 20:54 GMT Why don't you use the Science Diet Light Adult Cat food? Check with your Vet.
Phil P. - 12 Jan 2005 13:09 GMT > I'm trying to reduce my two cats calorie and fat intake. The Vet says > they are healthy but could lose a pound or two. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Currently I am giving them Science Diet Adult canned food. Rice is high in carbohydrate (about 30 kcal/oz). Adding rice to a pre-formulated diet will throw off the nutrient balance of the diet.
Cats eat to meet their energy needs. When energy needs are met, cats stop eating (unless their satiety cues are overridden by really palatable diets or behavioral factors are involved). All other nutrients must be in the diet in the right amounts to meet the cat's nutrient needs *before* her energy needs are met. By adding rice, the cat will meet her energy needs before her nutrient needs are met.
A moderately active *neutered* adult cat has a daily energy requirement (DER) of about 45 kcal/kg/day. For example, a 4 kg (~9 lbs) cat needs about 180 kcal/day. An active cat needs a little more and a sedentary cat's DER is closer to his basil energy requirement.
Assuming your cat is otherwise healthy, a *safe* weight loss diet for the above cat would be would be about 135 kcal/day or a 25% reduction in daily caloric intake -- allowing at least 4 weeks for each pound of weight loss. You don't want your cat to lose weight any faster than that. Rapid weight loss in cats can result in a serious, life-threatening liver disease called hepatic lipidosis a/k/a "fatty liver syndrome.
Another type of weight loss program would include calculating the cat's ideal or target body weight and feeding 45 kcal/kg for that weight. However, this program cannot be used as is in cats that are severely obese because the caloric reduction would be too severe. The program would need to implemented in steps. For example, if your cat weighs 9 kg the target weight would be 7 kg. His caloric intake would be calculated at 45 kcal X 7 kg BW or about 315 kcal/day. After he has maintained 7 kg for about 2 weeks, you can set a new target weight of 5 or 6 kg feeding 45 kcal/day/kg BW.
You can also take the prescription weight loss diet route (e.g., Hill's m/d or Purina DM). However, I've had the best results with moderate caloric reductions in the cats' regular food -- and its also less stressful for the cat. The last thing you want is an overweight cat to stop eating!
As far as "light" or "lite" diets go, I think they're better suited for weight maintenance than weight loss, if even that. Most light diets contain significant amounts of insoluble fiber which although increases satiety, it also displaces protein and fat and may interfere with nutrient absorption. They're also loaded with carbs - which is just what you want to avoid.
Before embarking on any weight loss program - run it by your vet, first.
About the best investment you can make in your cat's healthcare program is a good pediatric scale such as the Tanita 1583. Subtle weight losses and gains are difficult to notice in cats you see everyday - especially in long-hair cats. Subtle changes in weight can be an early warning sign of illness.
The Tanita has an auto weight lock-in feature and weight graduations of .5 oz. from zero to 20 lbs. (0-10 kg X 10 g) and 1 oz. from 20 to 40 lbs. (10-20 kg X 20 g). The scale is much easier to use without the infant tray. Just throw one or two small treats on the base and your cat will hop right on - with no struggling! http://www.maxshouse.com/weighing_a_cat_made_easy.htm
Good luck,
Phil
 Signature "A kitten, in the animal kingdom, is like a rosebud in a garden" Feline Healthcare: http://maxshouse.com
|
|
|