Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / December 2004
Should I get a dog?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
PattyC - 12 Dec 2004 00:04 GMT Hi all,
I have not been here for a long time. I am living happily with my 3 cats, plus one feral cat outside whom I feed and provide with a pretty nice little shelter.
Prior to getting cats in 2000, I'd never had pets. I have certainly learned to enjoy my kitties.
Lately, I have been thinking about getting a dog. I have talked to the local pet shelter about locating a 'cat friendly' dog. And I don't think I'd want a puppy. We are in discussions about whether this idea is a good one for me and my cats. I happened to visit a family today who has 2 dogs (they got them from breeders). They were quite cute. One was a terrier (like Toto!) and one was a Hungarian Vz...something. Both were very different, but each appealing.
May I ask how many of you have dogs also? How much is involved in having a dog, work-wise, effort, money, etc.? I want to be realistic, since I know my cats do not require me to leave the house in 10 degree weather for example!!...
I'm thinking I want a small dog, though today the pet counselor said they have 2 chiwawas (sp?? I CANT spell that??), and I was thinking ewww no. Not sure why except they don't seem much like dogs...
So, any advice, any suggestions as to what type of dog is good for a busy person with cats?
All advice appreciated.
PattyC
Cathy Friedmann - 12 Dec 2004 00:44 GMT > Hi all, > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > PattyC My sister has had both dogs & cats for years. Sometimes the dogs chase the cats just for funsies (dogs' idea of funsies, not the cats'), but for the most part the dogs basically ignore the cats & live in peaceful coexistence with them. One of her late cats actively liked one of the dogs - palled (is that the past tense of "pal" as a verb??) around w/ him, but AFAIK, he's the only cat who did.
I've personally never gone in for Chihuahuas, but I know a dog-oriented person from another ng who has at least two of them & loves the breed. She also has larger dogs - a German Shephard, for instance. This person has no cats, but she's mentioned that she frequents a dog ng - maybe people on a dog ng could give you some advice, too.
Dogs are definitely more work than cats, & their personalities are different - more adoring of their humans, I'd say - in general. When I go out of town, I just have my petsitter come in once or twice a day. With a dog, I think she'd have to come in at least 3 times/day - to walk the dog, or else would have to board the dog. Or have a friend housesit, taking care of the dog as a part of the deal. Coming home later than usual from work - with a cat it's not a problem, but with a dog could be a problem, I bet - the dog having to "hold it" longer than usual.
Otoh, dog people would consider these restrictions well worth the price, to have the company of their dog(s). I think it comes down to how much of a dog person one is.
Cathy
Angela St.Aubin - 12 Dec 2004 01:29 GMT > Hi all, > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > PattyC It shouldn't be about you thinking dogs are cute or how they are to care for, it should be about the fact you already have 4 animals to care for, and if you would be able to keep them safe healthy and happy with a dog in the house. Have you "borrowed" a dog to see how your cats get on with it?
Suzie-Q - 12 Dec 2004 07:05 GMT -> Hi all, -> -> I have not been here for a long time. I am living happily with my 3 cats, -> plus one feral cat outside whom I feed and provide with a pretty nice little -> shelter. -> -> Prior to getting cats in 2000, I'd never had pets. I have certainly learned -> to enjoy my kitties. -> -> Lately, I have been thinking about getting a dog. I have talked to the -> local pet shelter about locating a 'cat friendly' dog. And I don't think -> I'd want a puppy. We are in discussions about whether this idea is a good -> one for me and my cats. I happened to visit a family today who has 2 dogs -> (they got them from breeders). They were quite cute. One was a terrier -> (like Toto!) and one was a Hungarian Vz...something. Both were very -> different, but each appealing. -> -> May I ask how many of you have dogs also? How much is involved in having a -> dog, work-wise, effort, money, etc.? I want to be realistic, since I know -> my cats do not require me to leave the house in 10 degree weather for -> example!!... -> -> I'm thinking I want a small dog, though today the pet counselor said they -> have 2 chiwawas (sp?? I CANT spell that??), and I was thinking ewww no. Not -> sure why except they don't seem much like dogs... -> -> So, any advice, any suggestions as to what type of dog is good for a busy -> person with cats? -> -> All advice appreciated.
That's a very hard question to answer without knowing you and more about your situation.
The first thing that really jumped out at me was when you referred to yourself as a "busy person." What does that mean? Are you gone from home most of the time? If so, I would say no, don't get a dog. It wouldn't be fair to leave it alone a lot in a new place. And it could result in the dog becoming anxious and tearing your house apart for entertainment.
When I got my first dog, I got a small dog expressly so that it wouldn't intimidate my cats. I got a dachsund puppy. Also, I was taking college classes so I was only away from home for a few hours a day. I spent as much time with the puppy (Rosie) as possible so that I could train her properly and bond with her. She even slept with me so that, when she woke up during the night I would carry her outside to pee. (I wouldn't recommend sleeping with your puppy if you're not a light sleeper, like I am.) Also, it was February/March, and the house was quite cold at night.
Since the cats were there first, she learned that they were "supposed" to be there and didn't have any issues with them. In fact, when the younger two cats got used to Rosie, they played together.
For any cat owner who decides to get a puppy, I would stronly suggest keeping the cats' claws short/dull until the animals get used to each other.
If you have a reputable animal rescue organization nearby (SPCA, Humane Society, or some other org.), do look into getting an older dog that has proven to get along with cats. Tell them you're looking for a small dog. Be completely honest with them -- let them know just how "busy" you are.
Whatever you decide to do, please DO NOT buy a puppy from a pet store. Those dogs come from puppy mills and are usually in poor health. You can find more information on that on the web.
 Signature 8^)~~~ Sue (remove the x to e-mail) ~~~~~~ "I reserve the absolute right to be smarter today than I was yesterday." -Adlai Stevenson
http://www.suzanne-eckhardt.com/ ***Revelation 22:12*** ICQ: 349878998 http://www.intergnat.com/malebashing/
Monique Y. Mudama - 13 Dec 2004 03:56 GMT > So, any advice, any suggestions as to what type of dog is good for a busy > person with cats? For a busy person? I wouldn't recommend a dog.
I love dogs, and have been dreaming of getting one for a long time, but what holds me back is the certain knowledge that I don't have time for a dog. Yes, dogs need to go out regularly, and that's part of it, but more importantly, dogs are extremely people-oriented. Cats may be part of the household, but to the dog, they will never replace time spent with their human. Also, even a trained dog needs routine reinforcement of that training, *with you*. Training with another person will only go so far; a dog needs to know that it has to obey *you*, not its teacher.
I got my cat to keep company with an aging dog, and that worked fine. My cat and I then moved in with my brother, who had a young shepherd/lab mix (big dog), and that was okay. The cat was allowed upstairs, which the dog wasn't, so she had some freedom. The dog was crated during the day (I really don't like this practice), so the cat also had some "safe" roam-around-the-house time.
The cat didn't really care for the dog, but the dog thought she was a playmate, just like everyone else. He would chase her around the house, but while she would bap at his nose, she'd never use her claws. She seemed to understand he was just a big (very big!), friendly kid with a wet nose.
I also knew a german shepherd who lived with many cats when I was a child. He ignored most of them, but he would play with the cat and carry her from place to place in his mouth. They were best friends. BUT the dog also got a *lot* of attention from the family. And he was raised from tiny puppyhood with cats.
Something to realize: many dogs will eat droppings out of the litter box. Don't ask me why. Also, some cats won't use covered litter boxes, so that may or may not be an available solution.
Dogs: significant time and money investment. Dogs need more than food and exercise, though both are important; they need bonding time with their owners, or they are miserable and often become destructive. They need to play. They need walks. They need to be around people. Just letting them out in the yard or taking them on walks just long enough to "do their business" isn't enough. Oh, also, in my experience, a dog needs to get a certain amount of exercise in order to maintain healthy bowel movement.
Here's one of many dog breed questionnaires on the web:
http://www.petnet.com.au/selectapet/dogselectapet.html
Be aware that some breeds, particularly hunters, are inappropriate for life with cats. There are certain breeds that are known for killing cats once they mature, even if they grew up with the cats. Do your research.
Also be aware that dogs are typically not picky eaters. It would not be unusual for you to take the dog to the vet a few times in its life to make it vomit up something it should never have eaten. (My dog ate a plastic bag filled with rotting sandwiches found near a garbage can on one of our walks ... it took him about 3 nanoseconds to wolf that bag down.) Some breeds have well-known disorders that can be expensive, tragic, or both. Mutts are typically much more robust than pure-bred dogs.
If you do decide to get a dog, I can't advise you on breeds, as I really don't care for most little dogs. The exception being dachshunds, who don't typically act like little dogs. In the large dog category, labrador retrievers are well known for their forgiving, loving personalities, but they really do thrive with human attention. On the other end of the personality spectrum are rottweilers, who are loving, but who require an owner who is willing to be dominant *and* spend gobs of time with them. Rottweilers without enough attention will get bored and eat whatever home furnishings are in sight.
 Signature monique, who is sometimes allowed to pet Oscar, a grey^H^H^H^Hblue-cream DLH with an attitude!
Cathy Friedmann - 13 Dec 2004 04:27 GMT <a bunch of snippings>
> Something to realize: many dogs will eat droppings out of the litter box. > Don't ask me why. Also, some cats won't use covered litter boxes, so that may > or may not be an available solution. Anecdote that goes along w/ this: One day my sister arrived home from work to find one of their dogs - a large one (Rottweiler) - greeting her at the door & all thrilled to see her, as usual. *Except* he was wearing a huge pink plastic head. ;-) Why? Because he'd been eating cat droppings out of the covered litter box, & the cover'd become stuck on his head! Didn't seem to bother him in the least, no matter how it must've felt, or how completely absurd he looked. ;-D
> Some breeds have > well-known disorders that can be expensive, tragic, or both. Mutts are > typically much more robust than pure-bred dogs. More anecdotal stuff of my sister's (since she's the one of us who's a dog person): They've had a few Rotties, & also a medium-large sized mutt who was rescued & adopted when a little puppy. Despite super-good veterinary care, the Rotties have all died young to relatively young, aged from 4 - 8 (I think, maybe 7?), mostly of cancer. But Max, the mutt, lived to be 18, just shy of 19.
Cathy
Monique Y. Mudama - 13 Dec 2004 07:50 GMT > Anecdote that goes along w/ this: One day my sister arrived home from work > to find one of their dogs - a large one (Rottweiler) - greeting her at the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > to bother him in the least, no matter how it must've felt, or how completely > absurd he looked. ;-D This is one of the wonderful things about dogs. They don't care if they look silly. In fact, one breed, the golden retriever, seems to make a career of it, and they even develop a white "clown" face as they age, to add to the effect.
> More anecdotal stuff of my sister's (since she's the one of us who's a dog > person): They've had a few Rotties, & also a medium-large sized mutt who was > rescued & adopted when a little puppy. Despite super-good veterinary care, > the Rotties have all died young to relatively young, aged from 4 - 8 (I > think, maybe 7?), mostly of cancer. But Max, the mutt, lived to be 18, just > shy of 19. Well, to be fair, the larger a dog is, the shorter its lifespan tends to be. Four is awfully young, but eight for a very large dog isn't surprising. Eighteen is exceptionally old, even for a small dog, and most definitely for a medium to large one.
I think of a dog's lifespan as "around" ten years, although of course there are outliers in either direction. My dog, a black lab mix around 60 pounds, lived to be 12, and that is pretty typical, if not a bit high. I do think he would have lived a bit longer, and his last year would have been better, if I hadn't moved him from a house with a yard to an apartment; in hindsight, I wish I had lost the custody battle with my parents. The cold, wet Virginia winters didn't help his arthritis any.
To the original poster: if you have any doubts at all about getting a dog, don't. Having a dog is like having a child who never grows up. It's a magical, wonderful experience, but you don't want to end up like me, feeling that your dog could have had a better life if only you'd had more time for him. Puma deserved better than the person I was back then. I will not own a dog until I know that I will have the time for him, and that when he passes on, I will have no regrets about how he lived his last few years.
 Signature monique, who is sometimes allowed to pet Oscar, a grey^H^H^H^Hblue-cream DLH with an attitude!
Ashley - 13 Dec 2004 08:23 GMT > Well, to be fair, the larger a dog is, the shorter its lifespan tends to > be. > Four is awfully young, but eight for a very large dog isn't surprising. > Eighteen is exceptionally old, even for a small dog, and most definitely > for a > medium to large one. My parents dog, a German shepherd/foxie cross (at least, that was the best guess of the pound people - none of us really want to think about the practicalities of how *that* came about!) was put down earlier this year with a best guess for her age being 17. She was at least 6 months old when my parents got her, about 16.5 years before we realised she'd had enough. She was a small-medium dog, and was sprightly right up until about 6 months before she died. Even then, when my sister came home from the States for Christmas, Libby still had considerable ability to be excited and to enjoy life. Had she not been put down in July, she probably would only have had a few months left in her - she lived actively and fully right up to a few months before death, then she deteriorated badly.
Certainly, at that time she had the appearance and behaviour of a very, very old dog. But still, at times, she looked like a puppy! It was sad when she was put down (I was there) but we all consoled ourselves that she was in her yard, being held by Dad, who had become her primary carer after my sister left home, with Mum and me patting her, it was very, very quick and painless and she'd had a very long and exciting life!
Meghan Noecker - 15 Dec 2004 07:45 GMT >Well, to be fair, the larger a dog is, the shorter its lifespan tends to be. >Four is awfully young, but eight for a very large dog isn't surprising. >Eighteen is exceptionally old, even for a small dog, and most definitely for a >medium to large one. Very true. We were very fortunate that out collie lived to be 12 or 13. And I think it really helped that we now have things like glucosamine to help with arthritis.
My first sheltie lived to be 14, and I think she would have lived longer, but she went blind at age 9, and was pretty inactive after that. She could go on walks with me, and even run with me. But she couldn't run on her own or with anybody else. And she couldn't play active games anymore. So, she gained weight, was less active, and her arthritis got worse. I hadn't heard of glucosamine back then.
>To the original poster: if you have any doubts at all about getting a dog, >don't. Having a dog is like having a child who never grows up. Yes. Dogs do take a lot more time. Not that I don't give my cats a lot of my time. They hang around me all the time. But cats aren't known for chewing up the furniture and leaving messes in the house because they are bored. They usually just get fat and lazy. Not good, but not so damaging either.
And breed does make a difference. Some breeds need a lot more attention, either because they have more energy, or because they are hard-wired for more interaction. We have shelties, and they are known for being trouble makers if left to their own too much. My first sheltie was dumped at a shelter for being a nuisance and had a reputaion in the neighborhood. We never had a problem with her. I was 10 and lived in a small farm at the time. It was a perfect situation for her.
My mom got a rescue sheltie who was from a puppy mill. I think she was older than stated as I can't see why the puppy mill gave up a breeder dog for free. But the guy who got her thought it was a great deal to get a free dog. Unfortunately, he and his wife both worked full-time, and a puppy mill breeder dog has not had any training They are kept in cages. So, this dog was not housebroken, and she was anxious and overactive. She was chewing everything in the house and making messes everywhere. The guy called the rescue group and told them to take the dog or it was going to the shelter. He only had her for one month. They couldn't stand it. The rescue group knew we already had an abused rescue that had shown great improvement, and we had looked at taking another but didn't match with any of the available dogs. My mom went to see the dog and brought her home. She was housebroken in less than a week, and only a few things got chewed on. One towel, a watch, and the shoelaces off my shoes once. Once she settled in, she was great. But my parents are retired, so there is usually somebody home, and we had a crate for when we weren't. She was also more comfortable in a crate, so we took the door off one and put in the living room so she had a place to retreat to.
I think an adult, well-adjusted dog can go to a home where people are gone during the day, but it needs to be a dog who isn't going to get into trouble, and there needs to be enough time in the schedule to give them enough attention when people are home.
The temperment and energy levels are far more important that looks or size.
 Signature -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
Sherry - 15 Dec 2004 14:20 GMT >I think an adult, well-adjusted dog can go to a home where people are >gone during the day, but it needs to be a dog who isn't going to get [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >-- >Meghan & the Zoo Crew That's right. Some breed needs a *job* or they just go nuts and get destructive, too. I hate it when people get border collies and expect them to be nice little house dogs that will patiently sit and wait on the owners to come home all day. They won't, poor things. They can't, and they always get in trouble.
Sherry
-L. - 13 Dec 2004 07:01 GMT Patty,
I have had animals all my life - everything from a raccoon to reptiles. While I love dogs and think there is nothing like having a canine companion, as compared to cats, dogs are a total pain. Your entire life will revolve around getting home to let the dog outside, and spending time with the dog. Cats don't require near the same amount of attention. Currently I have 2 dogs and 2 cats and if I were to do it over, I would just stick with cats. Cats are just soooo much easier!
I love my dogs dearly, but honestly, I don't ever want another one. My oldest dog is terminally ill, and it's killing me. I see her body give out more and more each day, yet her spirit is still as bright as it has ever been. I don't ever want to go through this again. (Of course you go through it with cats, too, but cats aren't expressive in the same way, if you know what I mean.)
-L.
J1Boss - 13 Dec 2004 12:46 GMT Patty - dogs and cats can be terrific companions, but dogs DO require a lot more time and scheduling than cats. And yes, they are all very interested in cat boxes (not to mention cat food if you free feed the kitties).
I've got 2 of each. They all adore each other and can most frequently be found snoozing together. I have to admit that I really love that. Chasing is not allowed, and new puppies learn that immediately upon arrival. Even a just playful large dog can break cat's back.
My cats require that I am here at breakfast and dinner, and overnight, but otherwise, they're pretty fine on their own, because they have each other and the dogs. The dogs can get by with that, but their exercise needs as well as elimination needs means that getting by really isn't the right answer.
My dogs are 4 and 8. The 8 year old needs daily play and is happy to hold down the couch most of the time. The 4 year old has weekly agility class, flyball practice (very active dog sports) and hunt training. These activities take up a fair amount of time but are necessary for his physical and mental well-being (and therefore, MINE!). Now, he's a very active example of a very active breed, so not all dogs require such, but even the lowest maintenance dog needs to go out in the morning, dinner, and bedtime, plus 2 more outings, some play time, and a walk. And they are SOCIAL beings, who really need to be part of someone's life. Sometimes the kitty companionship helps fill that, but often not.
Janet Boss http://bestfriendsdogobedience.com/ http://photos.yahoo.com/bestfriendsobedience
kaeli - 13 Dec 2004 15:28 GMT > May I ask how many of you have dogs also? How much is involved in having a > dog, work-wise, effort, money, etc.? I want to be realistic, since I know > my cats do not require me to leave the house in 10 degree weather for > example!!... If you don't have time to have children, you don't have time for a dog. :)
Forget staying out late - you need to get home to take care of the dog. Forget sleeping in - the dog needs to go potty. And no matter how cold it is, she still needs to go out.
When you have a dog, your life pretty much revolves around the dog (if you're a good owner, anyway). Some people shove them in the yard and forget about them, but we're talking GOOD dog care, so be prepared to spend a lot of time messing with the dog. Taking it out, grooming it, playing with it, training it, etc. I got a small dog so that she's welcome a lot of places (other people's homes, mostly) and can exercise in my home (ball tossing is a fav, as is tug- of-war). When I go to my parents' house or to family functions, she comes with. When I go to the barn on the weekends, she often comes with (weather permitting). If I have to be out for longer than normal (like when I go bowling after work every other wednesday), my parents come over and watch her. Some people even do doggy day care. No joke. And THAT can get very pricey.
Dogs are not good pets for 'busy' people, especially if they live alone. Dogs are highly social animals and NEED you. Like a baby needs you. Having a dog is like perpetually having a toddler. Seriously. Before even thinking about what breed you want or if you can afford a dog, think about whether you have enough TIME to devote to a dog for UP TO 15 YEARS. If you think you can do that, THEN start looking at what kind of dog best fits your lifestyle. After you've gotten that, THEN start looking for ones that get along with cats. Once you've found your perfect dog, you can see how much money you might need to care for it. Some dogs require a lot more grooming than others (mine needs clipped, which I do myself to save money). Some eat a lot more than others. Some breeds are prone to more physical problems, which would mean vet bills. Some are big chewers, so you'll be spending a lot more on toys. It's hard to estimate how much money a dog will cost you until you've chosen a dog, but I'll tell you that my 10 pound poodle mix costs me roughly $600 a year on food, grooming stuff, vet bills, toys, and treats. If you plan on doing doggy day care, pet walking/sitting, professional grooming, or professional training, add on to that.
HTH
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ If God dropped acid, would he see people? http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
Monique Y. Mudama - 13 Dec 2004 17:02 GMT > Some people even do doggy day care. No joke. And THAT can get very > pricey. I do have some friends who do doggy day care at least once a week, and it seems like it's really good for the dog. The dog learns to interact positively with other dogs, gets tons of exercise, has worked a lot of energy off by the end of the day, and is generally a happy camper.
Of course, just like human day care, they have closing times, and you may have to pick your dog up by 6pm.
 Signature monique, who is sometimes allowed to pet Oscar, a grey^H^H^H^Hblue-cream DLH with an attitude!
Meghan Noecker - 15 Dec 2004 09:48 GMT >If you don't have time to have children, you don't have time for a dog. :) It's not THAT hard.
Meals are simpler. You don't have to help them with their homework, buy lots of clothes for them, or take them to various sports practices. Dogs are typically cheerful, honest, and easy to get along with. They don't get moody. They don't run up the phone bill or beg for expensive sneakers. And it's a lot easier to work your schedule around them than children.
Honestly, give the real parents more credit. It is far more time consuming AND expensive to have human children.
>Forget staying out late - you need to get home to take care of the dog. >Forget sleeping in - the dog needs to go potty. >And no matter how cold it is, she still needs to go out. It's not that bad. If you're really going to be gone that long, you can always ask somebody to come by and let them out.
If you live alone and will be gone a lot, then you shouldn't have dogs. Obviously. But you make it sound like a ball and chain.
And sleeping in? Give me a break. Just get up once and let them out on your way to the bathroom. You'll get a lot more sleep with a dog than with a kid.
And going out in the cold? The only reason you would be required to go out with them is if you do not have a yard, like an apartment. And frankly, the lack of space for the dog to run is far more important than us getting cold or not. There are ways to deal with these issues, if the person wants to have a dog. There are lots of people that take their dogs on walks, take the dogs to the park to run, or take the dogs to doggie daycare. They have happy healthy dogs, and while it may be harder than having a yard, they enjoy the dogs enough that it outweighs any negatives.
>Dogs are not good pets for 'busy' people, especially if they live alone. Dogs >are highly social animals and NEED you. I agree with this, but most of the need is just basic companionship. And that can be done while you do other things. You don't have to drop everything or give up your life. You can play with them multiple times during the day, sometimes while doing other things. We toss the toys for the dog or play tug of war while watching tv. We also groom them while watching tv. They sit on or next to us while we are in the living room or sitting on the bed. They snuggle up at bedtime.
>Like a baby needs you. Having a dog >is like perpetually having a toddler. Seriously. This I disagree with. Dogs may get into things, and they can have their moments. But they don't need nearly the care and attention that a toddler does. They can be left home alone for hours without any problems. Do the same with a toddler, and you will be lucky to find them alive.
>It's hard to estimate how much money a dog will cost you until you've chosen >a dog, but I'll tell you that my 10 pound poodle mix costs me roughly $600 a >year on food, grooming stuff, vet bills, toys, and treats. If you plan on >doing doggy day care, pet walking/sitting, professional grooming, or >professional training, add on to that. That's not bad though. And spread out over the year. That's less than $2 a day. A lot cheaper than smoking, or even drinking coffee or pop.
I don't mean to be argumenative, but your post came across to me as saying that having a dog is a real drag. Expensive and and a real pain.
My family has always had dogs. I got my own dog when I was 10. And since then, I have only spent 10 months without a dog. My mom still had a dog during that time, but I didn't have my own. And you know what? There are only a few times where I have felt that it was hard.
With Seusy, the only time was when she had her stroke and had to be put down. She was a true joy, and even now, my memories of her bring me joy. And when I see another dog who acts or moves like her, I get that joy back. My dog was a sheltie, but when I see a border collie playing or herding, I can see my Seusy in her prime.
Seusy was blind for the last 5 years of her life, and certainly, that meant more care for her. But even then, it was all worth it, and certainly not a hardship.
With Jenny, I had an initial hardship in that I wanted an older dog since I didn't feel I would have time for training a puppy. I was working 25 hours a week and going to college. My mom found an adult dog, but she had never been in a house before. And due to abuse, she had behavioral issues too. Frankly, the puppy would have been a ton easier. But I don't give dogs back. Once they are mine, they are mine for life. And you know what? I managed. There was some frustration, but not about time or money. It was mostly about me learning to deal with totally different situations. Not a blank slate, but a damaged slate. I had to learn how to look at the issues from her perspective and make it possible for her to leave the fear behind long enough to learn what I was teaching. I learned a lot from her, and I don't regret the hardship at all. She wasn't the dog I wanted, but she was definitely the dog I needed.
I've had Jenny 6 or 7 years now. I had great fear when I learned she has an enlarged heart. It really didn't cost that much to find out. I spent some hours at the university reading medical books, and I actually spent $100 to buy a good book on small animal cardiology, which verified everything the vet said, and calmed me down. I was so afraid to lose her, but all I had to do was restrict her activity, and keep her weight down.
A couple years ago, she had mange. This is more of a problem with shelties since they cannot take the pills for treatment. Instead, she had 6 medicated baths over 3 months. It was spendy, but spread out. And well worth the money to keep my precious doggie.
More recently, it has become obvious that her vision is fading. She will go blind too, and while she is very smart, she doesn't have an ideal temperment for a dog going blind. Seusy was patient and calm. Very trusting. Jenny is easily spooked.
As you can see, it hasn't been totally easy. There have been problems over the years. But I don't regret any of it. And I really don't see it is as hard, expect for a few short times.
When I need to go out of town, I can get a family member to take care of them. And frankly, I worry more about the cats. The dogs will sleep on anybody's bed. But the cats have problems when I am gone.
Kira used to have separate anxiety. She'd get sick all over my bed. For years, I would put a vinyl tablecloth on the bed, fuzzy side up, to protect my bed. I'd put a throw blanket on top to make it cusy for her. But I could come home, peel off the mess, and go to bed in a clean bed. The hardship was feeling guilty about being gone.
And Maynard, now that he is older. But he is actually less frail now than he was 2 years ago. I was so worried about leaving him for 2 weeks that I bought tonsof treats and left the pouches all over the house so that my sister would have no excuse not to feed him the treats. At that time, he was more a social eater, only eating when somebody was around. I came home and discovered that he had *gained* weight. He looked really good.
 Signature -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
kaeli - 15 Dec 2004 14:52 GMT > I don't mean to be argumenative, but your post came across to me as > saying that having a dog is a real drag. Expensive and and a real > pain. It CAN be. Especially for someone who's never had one. Many, many dogs are dropped off at shelters simply because people didn't realize how much work they are. The OP specifically stated that she's never had a dog and made a reference to having to go out in 10 degree weather, giving me the impression that she didn't have a yard to let the dog out in.
I'm not saying they're not worth it. If I felt that way, I wouldn't have one. Most people with dogs will expound on how wonderful they are (I know I love mine to pieces) and neglect to mention all the hassles involved because to us, they really *aren't* hassles. We're used to it. But to someone who has never had a dog, it can be a real change in lifestyle. What's getting hit in the a.s with snowballs first thing in the morning compared to wonderful doggy kisses? :)
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ When a clock is hungry, it goes back four seconds. http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
Mary - 15 Dec 2004 17:24 GMT > > I don't mean to be argumenative, but your post came across to me as > > saying that having a dog is a real drag. Expensive and and a real [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > reference to having to go out in 10 degree weather, giving me the impression > that she didn't have a yard to let the dog out in. FWIW, Kaeli, reading your post on dogs reinforced my impression that I would not do well with one--which is true. I have a much more err ... contemplative than active life, shall we say? ;)
Monique Y. Mudama - 15 Dec 2004 16:02 GMT >>If you don't have time to have children, you don't have time for a dog. :) >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > moody. They don't run up the phone bill or beg for expensive sneakers. And > it's a lot easier to work your schedule around them than children. Well, you *do* have to help them with their homework (keeping them in the habits they learned when they were trained). And I do know dogs who go to sports practice -- dogs who play flyball or herd recreationally. I have a friend who drives hours out of her way every weekend because her dog loves to herd!
As for moody ... um, well. My dog used to lie down with his butt facing you when he felt insulted. With doggie farts, that's a dangerous form of moodiness! Granted, they're not as moody as kids, but they can be as moody as cats (destructive when bored, picky eaters when upset, etc).
[snip]
> When I need to go out of town, I can get a family member to take care of > them. And frankly, I worry more about the cats. The dogs will sleep on [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > come home, peel off the mess, and go to bed in a clean bed. The hardship was > feeling guilty about being gone. Depends on the dog. My dog would lose weight if we left town; he'd only eat if the dogsitter stood by his bowl with him. He wanted companionship for meals. And whenever my dad was away on business, he'd mope, also not eat much, and would go nuts when he heard dad's voice on the answering machine.
When I didn't spend enough time with my dog, he ate cardboard boxes. I felt awful. Of course it wasn't his fault; it was mine.
I love dogs. I really do. But as someone who *does* know how much work they are, I harden my heart when I think of getting a puppy, or even an older dog. I just know that my lifestyle right now is too selfish for dog ownership. I do think it would be easier on me than on someone who's never had a dog.
 Signature monique, who is sometimes allowed to pet Oscar, a grey^H^H^H^Hblue-cream DLH with an attitude!
ceb - 13 Dec 2004 17:54 GMT > Lately, I have been thinking about getting a dog. I have talked to > the local pet shelter about locating a 'cat friendly' dog. And I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > quite cute. One was a terrier (like Toto!) and one was a Hungarian > Vz...something. Both were very different, but each appealing. Vizsla?
> May I ask how many of you have dogs also? How much is involved in > having a dog, work-wise, effort, money, etc.? I want to be realistic, > since I know my cats do not require me to leave the house in 10 degree > weather for example!!... I currently have one dog and one cat. I have had cats for most of my life, but just got the dog as a puppy three years ago. Dogs are a lot more work than cats, since as you say they must be walked in all weather, and they can't be left for as long. I have to always go straight home from work now, for instance, whereas when I just had cats I could go out after work, no problem. Of course you can arrange for dog walkers to ease that situation a bit. But I also feel that the dog needs more interaction time with me than the cats ever did (although I tend to be a homebody and did give the cats lots of time).
By the time I got my dog, I was ready to make the commitment -- and she has been totally worth it -- she has brought me a lot of joy.
> I'm thinking I want a small dog, though today the pet counselor said > they have 2 chiwawas (sp?? I CANT spell that??), and I was thinking > ewww no. Not sure why except they don't seem much like dogs... Some of the small dogs might not be good choices -- terriers for instance can be terrible with cats (although we always had terriers with cats when I was growing up, and never had any problems). I personally like chihuahuas but always felt as a tall woman that it would be a comical picture, me taking my tiny dog for a walk!
If you're going to adopt an adult dog, the shelter/rescue people will know generally whether s/he is good with cats. I got Zoe as a puppy, and like all puppies she wanted to chase the cat. I successfully taught her not to, and she lived in harmony with Madeline and now with Rosalie. She's a cocker/chow cross. The thing to probably watch out for is prey drive -- don't get a dog with a high prey drive.
And if you get a dog, plan on taking obedience classes. A well-trained dog is a good family member and a good citizen -- it made all the difference to me and Zoe. I tried reading books and training her on my own, but having a class with a teacher was invaluable -- the teacher was able to point out what I was doing wrong and help me fix it.
Oh, also, make sure you have plenty of time to exercise the dog. A tired dog is a well-behaved dog. Lots of dogs don't get enough exercise and sometimes behave problematically because of that.
> So, any advice, any suggestions as to what type of dog is good for a > busy person with cats? I've known dogs of many breeds who have lived amiably with cats. If you're too busy to go home during the day, you should get an adult dog rather than a puppy. Plan to separate the dog from the cats until you know they're getting along great -- in my case, when I got Rosalie, I separated them only for a couple of days -- Rosalie wanted out, and wasn't scared of Zoe. You'll know when they are reliable together. When you're home, plan on supervising their interactions constantly for a while. Most dogs will have to be taught to respect the cats.
I also make it clear in dog-language that the cat is the boss. Zoe "helps" me feed Rosalie (by accompanying me when I feed her), and Rosalie eats first (before the dog). Zoe has to come to me for treats, but I take the treats to wherever Rosalie is. Stuff like that. Also, no matter what the cat does, the dog is not to react aggressively -- Rosalie for instance likes to bat at Zoe's gorgeous plumey tail -- no growling is allowed, I don't care what has happened. I will also speak sharply to the cat if I think she is in the wrong, but it's Zoe's behavior that must be controlled because Zoe is the stronger of the two (but don't tell her I said that).
I really like having a dog and a cat because they are very different and I love both the cat and the dog ways of being. They also demand different sorts of attention, as a single person I feel like I can give them both good attention on their own terms. They are also good company for each other, I think.
--Catherine & Rosalie the calicohead with special guest appearance by Zoe the cockerchow
Monique Y. Mudama - 13 Dec 2004 19:09 GMT > I also make it clear in dog-language that the cat is the boss. Zoe "helps" > me feed Rosalie (by accompanying me when I feed her), and Rosalie eats first [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > wrong, but it's Zoe's behavior that must be controlled because Zoe is the > stronger of the two (but don't tell her I said that). I think this depends on the personalities of the animals involved. You'd be amazed at how well a 10-pound cat can cow an 80-pound dog. In some households, the dogs are the ones that need defending!
 Signature monique, who is sometimes allowed to pet Oscar, a grey^H^H^H^Hblue-cream DLH with an attitude!
PattyC - 14 Dec 2004 01:15 GMT >> Lately, I have been thinking about getting a dog. I have talked to >> the local pet shelter about locating a 'cat friendly' dog. And I [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > & Rosalie the calicohead > with special guest appearance by Zoe the cockerchow Thanks for all the thoughts on this. I am self employed and mostly work at home, so while I am "busy," I am also around more than many might be.
I think the key question is whether I am willing to do the work involved.
Wouldn't you know I 'met' a 6 mo. chocolate lab puppy today at the shelter who really touched my heart? We took him into the 'cat room' and he sniffed then licked one of the friendly cats...
All the advice given is appreciated.
I have some thinking to do.
PattyC
Meghan Noecker - 15 Dec 2004 09:55 GMT >while. Most dogs will have to be taught to respect the cats. I know this was a serious statement, but it made me laugh. It didn't take our dogs long to respect the cats. I have never met a cat that let a dog walk on it.
Jenny won't let another dog steal her food, but she will stand back and let the cats help themselves.
>I really like having a dog and a cat because they are very different and >I love both the cat and the dog ways of being. They also demand different >sorts of attention, as a single person I feel like I can give them both >good attention on their own terms. Dogs make you feel like a god, and cats put you back in your place :)
They are very different yet both wonderful.
 Signature -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
jamie - 15 Dec 2004 22:01 GMT > May I ask how many of you have dogs also? How much is involved in having a > dog, work-wise, effort, money, etc.? I want to be realistic, since I know > my cats do not require me to leave the house in 10 degree weather for > example!!... Since you describe yourself as a busy person, I really wouldn't recommend getting a dog at this time.
Keep in mind that unlike cats, dogs are pack animals. In addition to walking your dog, for a dog to feel secure and be well-behaved, they require a lot of both training and play-attention to learn that you are leader of their pack. Without the security of you acting as their pack leader, they are a lot more likely to be anxious and do things like chew up your belongings, tip over the trash, be a barking nuisance, etc.
I've had dogs with cats in the past, but not now. As to what kind of dog to get with cats, I personally prefer a medium-sized dog large enough not to be intimidated by the cats, rather than a very small dog.
Another point to consider is that some breeds, especially herding "working dog" breeds, can tend to be nervous if they don't have a large yard to run around in and expend energy.
 Signature jamie (jamiemck@newsguy.com)
"There's a seeker born every minute."
|
|
|