Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

From the President of THe Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gina - 28 Oct 2004 18:21 GMT
It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and
disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.
As
President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to
feel hurt, not to mention furious.

On July 22, 2002, The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc.  became
legally
incorporated with the Pennsylvania Department Of State Corporation
Bureau. Incorporated as a "Domestic Nonprofit Corporation, Entity #
3084565", we indeed CAN legally call ourselves a nonprofit
corporation.

On August 30, 2002, The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc. was granted
by The United States Internal Revenue Service the status of 501c3,
tax-exmpt.

We were granted both the incorpration and the status because not only
did we follow proper channels, we indeed adhere strictily to our
Mission
Statement, Article 2 of our Articles of Incrporation.

The primary objective of our mission is to provide life-long care to
unwanted and abandoned domestic animals, and when possible find them
new forever homes. Our adoption policy is strict. We make sure that
any animal which leaves our shelter is moving on to a lifetime of love
and care. If our policies deter someone, and they instead adopt from a
"Kill" shelter, I'm pleased that an animal has been spared unnecessary
euthanasia.

At The Last Resort, cats and bunnies enjoy a cage-free life. Because
of this, surrenders are required to provide proof of spay/neuter,
vaccines, etc., and must give a surrender fee of at least $50.
Considering it costs any shelter an average of $700 per year to
support one animal, I think our fee is a bargain.

I, as President, manage the administration of this shelter, it's
website, and all operations. I have the help and support of my very
dedicated staff: Nicole Newark, Ibai Munoz, Nathaniel Snyder, Lori
Rodgers, Steve Smith, Heather Baublitz, Sandy Leathery and Joe
Cartwright.

I, as Caretaker, am personally, daily involved in all aspects of the
cats and rabbits of The Last Resort's care, welfare, and happiness. I
do
this every waking hour that I am not at my full-time job. I sleep very
little. My clothes smell like cats. My home is my office. My answering
macine is always blinking. My phone rings every day and night,
including
weekends.

I, as Founder, am deeply saddened that a few disassociated cyber
posters, would defame the name and mission of a charity and it's
people,
who give everything, every spare moment, every spare penny, to enable
the shelter to grow and flourish.

We work hard, together. We scoop poop, we vaccinate, we haul litter in
our cars, we return calls to people who want to give up their
life-long
pet "just because", we trap, we fundraise, we beg, we bargain, we
network, we laugh, we cry  and then we laugh some more.

THis shelter IS legitimate not only because the state and federal
government say so, but because of the love, blood, sweat, tears and
joy
we pour into it every day of our lives.

The picture on our web site, which I've read one faceless poster to
desscribe as an
"atrocious... tiny room..." was taken in our former barn of 2000
square
feet, with multi levels, windows and screened sitting areas.  

We indeed are registered with PetFinder.Com, our shelter # is PA295.
When the farm was sold out from under us in July 2004, we relocated
our
animals in to 5 foster locations, one being a 50 acre private farm,
with
use of a 3000 square foot barn and a summer house. Our PetFinder site
is
temporarily hidden while we reorganize, repair our newly donated
building, and continue to grow.

I'm ashamed for the people in the world like Edwin, and perhaps some
of
these cyber posters, who see the world through a veil of cynicism.
It's
as though they need to destroy what is good and joyous, so that they
may
have some captive company in their dark, lonely lives.

My email is always accepting. My phone always rings. ANyone with
questions need only call or write.  I'm damn proud of our Last Resort
Animal Sanctuary, of our mission, and most importantly of our
volunteers. Time and time again the outside shows me how lucky I and
the
cats and the bunnies are to have them. Thank you Nicole, Ibai, Nate,
Lori, Steve, Heather, Sandy and Joe. I love you.

Gina Henderson, President/Founder
717-792-3203
caretaker@thelastresort.us
lastresortanimal@cs.com
www.thelastresort.us
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 18:28 GMT
> It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and
> disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
> lastresortanimal@cs.com
> www.thelastresort.us

From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no
real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in. I certainly would not
want to support this organization. There will just be more and more animals,
and something will eventually have to give--which is why you are resorting
to soliciting funds online.
Diane L. Schirf - 29 Oct 2004 01:53 GMT
> From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no
> real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in.

Huh?

Signature

http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/

Mary - 29 Oct 2004 04:08 GMT
> > From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no
> > real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in.
>
> Huh?

That's my take on it.
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 18:31 GMT
> It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and disrepectful
thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.

I would also like to suggest that before you decided to solicit funds in
newsgroups, you should probably have made an effort to understand what
Usenet is. There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an
international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 28 Oct 2004 19:44 GMT
>There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an
>international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate.

Actually that is what Google does call usenet with the further
confusing NEWS referring to news media. You have Web, Images, Groups
News to pick from when you to conduct a search.

-mhd
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 20:20 GMT
> >There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an
> >international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate.
>
> Actually that is what Google does call usenet with the furtherconfusing
NEWS referring to news media. You have Web, Images, GroupsNews to pick from
when you to conduct a search.

> -mhd

I know there is a "Google Groups" part of the search function, but the
"prez" appears unaware that Usenet exists outside of Google, see what I
mean?

Hey, how about them Bosox. :)
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 29 Oct 2004 04:37 GMT
>Hey, how about them Bosox. :)

Grrrr. Oh well, that will hold them 'til 2090.

-mhd
Mary - 29 Oct 2004 06:21 GMT
> >Hey, how about them Bosox. :)
>
> Grrrr. Oh well, that will hold them 'til 2090.
>
> -mhd

:-) Most likely.
KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 18:57 GMT
> The primary objective of our mission is to provide life-long care to
> unwanted and abandoned domestic animals, and when possible find them
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "Kill" shelter, I'm pleased that an animal has been spared unnecessary
> euthanasia.

So you are not a shelter, with a focus of rehoming animals.  You are a
sanctuary.  Again, I ask, why should a highly adoptable animal have to live
in a sanctuary?  IMHO, sanctuaries are for animals that have absolutely no
other chance of having a forever home.
Our shelter also has fairly strict guidelines, and we see about 3-4
adoptions a week, sometimes more.  We also readily publish where we are
located so people can f'n VISIT the shelter.  Yes, we do get dumped animals
sometimes.  But you know what?  I'm glad that people at least knew where we
were and didn't take them to the municipal shelter or drown them in the
river or something.

> At The Last Resort, cats and bunnies enjoy a cage-free life. Because
> of this, surrenders are required to provide proof of spay/neuter,
> vaccines, etc., and must give a surrender fee of at least $50.
> Considering it costs any shelter an average of $700 per year to
> support one animal, I think our fee is a bargain.

What about the cats and bunnies that do not meet your criteria, or do not
come with a handy $50?  How does it cost $700/ year to support an animal
that comes in fully vetted?  At the shelter I'm with, we give priority to
the stray cat who's not spayed/neutered and probably never seen a vet
before, whether they come in with a donation or not.  We look at it like
this:  by taking that intact cat off the streets, we saved that cat and any
babies it may have produced.  The owner turn-in who needs a new home because
baby developed allergies or whatever can wait.  We can work with them to
keep the cat to a confined area until we have room, or some other solution.

Look, just about everyone who regularly participates on this newsgroup is
either a volunteer or paid staffer at a shelter, or has a shelter they know
and trust with their donations.  You can't come on here and post, expecting
an outpouring of support and money without people being suspicious.
Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
www.kelltek.com
Check out www.snittens.com

Sunflower - 28 Oct 2004 18:58 GMT
You must be very new to both rescue and the internet indeed if you feel that
a spam of newsgroups is the best method to raise funds for your animals.
What other fundraising programs do you have? Certainly you receive some
community support, yes?  If not, then why not?  Surely you have applied for
grants from the PetSmart Foundation, the PetCo Foundation, Maddie's Fund and
others?  If not, why not?

Anyone who posts in cyberspace and isnt' a kook had better be willing to
back up their statements with verifiable facts.  That's just common sense
and good security measures for someone to fact check. It is incumbent on the
person stating the fact to provide verification of that fact, not someone
who questions the information.  Thus far, the only facts that you have
provided have been that you are a 501 c3 organization. Fine.  Lots of groups
can get registered.  Not that many make over the long haul. With your
unwillingness to provide public information about your group and it's
policies, it's fairly easy to see that you'll probably be one of those
statistics that just don't make to the 5 year mark.

I will repeat the questions I posed in another thread in hopes that you will
be more willing to share information about your group.  It is public
verified information that succeeds in drawing both volunteers and donors.  A
group that ducks questions while repeating that they are "certified" implies
that they have something to hide.  A non profit can NOT afford to have that
reputation.  So, please do share with the public the answers to my
questions.

What are your adoption statistics?  I'd be more than happy to tell you
our shelter's. 80% of the animals that come through the door find homes,
with 10% being euthanized for health reasons, and 10% for overcrowding.
And we work damn hard to keep that rehomed figure that high.

How many cats do you take in and how many go out?  We took in 282 cats last
year and 450 dogs.  80% of them found homes.

How many cats are you currently housing? What is your adoption criteria?
What is your adoption fee?  How long does it take for a typical adoption to
occur?  What methods do you utilize to be sure that you find homes for these
animals?  None are listed on Petfinder and you don't have any information as
to how to view the pets at all.  Do you do remote location adoptions like at
PetSmart?

Just how can one adopt an animal when there is no information about any of
the animals or adoption proceedures?

Many "no kill" shelters are covers for collectors who take in far more
animals than they can adequately provide care for, even with donations from
the community.  If "adoption doesn't happen often", then you have to ask
yourself if you are in it for the animals benefit or not.  Because it's not
beneficial for any animal to *live* in a shelter situation.  All animals
deserve to own their own people to provide them with individual loving
attention.  And the fact that your group isn't very successful at doing this
is a huge red flag.

Where can one go to see a copy of the minutes of the meetings of your
organization as well as the required financial report information?  That is
required to be public information for any 501 c3 and ours is available at
our shelter.  Where is yours?  A PO box isn't an acceptible location. Care
to tell us how much money in fees were taken in last year?  How about
donations?  Donations in kind?  What were the outgoing expenses?  What was
the largest slice of that pie?  I can tell you that veterinary expenses were
approximately 85% of our approximately $34K budget, and our primary income
was from
adoption fees and one or two large donations.  Care to be that candid about
your group in public where it counts?

HSUS guidelines on feline housing will tell you exactly how much square
footage a cat should be allotted.  (Are you aware of what that figure is?)
Any organization that does not abide by that is inhumane in it's housing
policies.  On that, we agree. Our shelter utilizes a cattery for our longer
term residents as well. *We* spay and neuter and vaccinate the animals
before they're allowed to run in there though.  Every animal that comes
through our doors leaves up to date on shots and spayed or neutered.  These
are just the costs of running a rescue.  Where is the money going if you are
not paying for vaccines and spay/neuter?  You certainly can't have that big
a light bill.  Food is available by donation from grocery stores and chain
stores. Cat litter is too.  We get all of the burst bags free and therefore
only have to purchase kitten food and backup litter supplies.  If we can beg
like this, surely your group can!

If you don't take any animals in that need spay/neuter or shots or testing,
then you're not really running a rescue.  And if
you can't afford to provide these services to the animals that need them,
perhaps you'd best reassess whether or not your group has the financial
savvy to run a real rescue group.  It's just like finding an animal a
responsible home.  It takes more than love.  People  who "love animals" and
take in  large number of them but don't provide them with any medical care
from their own pocket or personal attention because of the large number of
animals are COLLECTORS.  And the really do believe that they are "saving
animals".  But the reality check is, they're actually creating more animal
suffering, not less.
kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 19:22 GMT
> It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and
> disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.
> As
> President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to
> feel hurt, not to mention furious.

Yet none of the really relevant questions have been answered.

Methinks thou protests too much.

Signature

--
~kaeli~
Suicide is the most sincere form of self-criticism.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 19:38 GMT
Here's the website of one of our local cageless shelters.
http://www.hhforcats.org/
Note obvious instructions for adopting, up-front fees, links to their
petfinder listings (which actually have cats listed - 78 when I checked
today), info on fundraising, and so on.

Here's another, even better, site.
http://www.felinesinc.org/
This one also has their adoption application right on the website.
They have 82 cats on petfinder.

None require vet checks or fees to take in cats.
They both post a real address for people, right on the sites. They both rely
on pure donations.

I'm not even going to go into the design of the site.  ;)

Signature

--
~kaeli~
Suicide is the most sincere form of self-criticism.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 19:51 GMT
> Here's another, even better, site.
> http://www.felinesinc.org/
> This one also has their adoption application right on the website.
> They have 82 cats on petfinder.

Wow, you mean I can *see* which cats are available for adoption, and how I
might go about adopting a cat?  That's amazing!!

> I'm not even going to go into the design of the site.  ;)

I thought it was a pretty nice site.  Well laid out, good format, color
choice, etc.

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
www.kelltek.com
Check out www.snittens.com

kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 21:13 GMT
> > Here's another, even better, site.
> > http://www.felinesinc.org/
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Wow, you mean I can *see* which cats are available for adoption, and how I
> might go about adopting a cat?  That's amazing!!

I know, right?

> > I'm not even going to go into the design of the site.  ;)
> >
> I thought it was a pretty nice site.  Well laid out, good format, color
> choice, etc.

I meant the OP's site wasn't all that, um, professional in appearance, in
case that was unclear. Or did you mean you liked the white text on the maroon
background with no apparent navigation of any kind and music running in the
background?

I think the felinesinc.org one was very nice. Harmony House could use someone
who knows color exists, IMO. *LOL*

Signature

--
~kaeli~
Support your local medical examiner: die strangely!
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 21:23 GMT
> I meant the OP's site wasn't all that, um, professional in appearance, in
> case that was unclear. Or did you mean you liked the white text on the
> maroon
> background with no apparent navigation of any kind and music running in
> the
> background?

Gotcha.  I thought you didn't like the Felines, Inc site. The OP site is
rather bad, speaking as a web designer.  I *hate* sites with music!  And,
their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up.  Bleh.

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
www.kelltek.com
Check out www.snittens.com

PawsForThought - 28 Oct 2004 22:25 GMT
>From: "KellyH" Kelly@whatever.com

>I *hate* sites with music!  And,
>their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up.  Bleh.

I hate sites with music too.  Nothing more obnoxious IMO.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
kaeli - 29 Oct 2004 13:53 GMT
> Gotcha.  I thought you didn't like the Felines, Inc site. The OP site is
> rather bad, speaking as a web designer.  I *hate* sites with music!

You and me both.
Especially when I'm at work and supposed to be working on OUR website. *LOL*
(I'm a web applications geek)

>  And,
> their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up.  Bleh.

It didn't do that to me. I use Firefox, though, and it tends to not pop
things up at me much.

Signature

--
~kaeli~
Why do people who know the least know it the loudest?
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

PawsForThought - 28 Oct 2004 22:25 GMT
>From: kaeli tiny_one@NOSPAM.comcast.net

>Here's the website of one of our local cageless shelters.
>http://www.hhforcats.org/
>Note obvious instructions for adopting, up-front fees, links to their
>petfinder listings (which actually have cats listed - 78 when I checked
>today), info on fundraising, and so on.

Well what do you know, they have an address.  Imagine that!  Wonder why the
"Last Resort Animal Sanctuary" can't supply the same?

Lauren
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Sherry - 28 Oct 2004 22:05 GMT
From the President, Last Resort Animal Sanctuary's post & mass e-mailing:

>It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and
>disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.

Actually, the thread was neither. Anything posted on usenet is subject to
opinion. You received several opinions which were based on the information you
chose to share. You are welcome to offer further information in order to
dispute any opinion. It's called debate. It's what usenet is made of.

>As
>President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to
>feel hurt, not to mention furious.

Imagine usenet as a street corner. Anything you post is subject to the opinions
of many, many people. Don't take it personally. If you do, usenet is not for
you. It is a discussion forum. You chose to *mis-use* the forum as a
fundraising tool. You have no right to feel furious, or hurt. With that choice,
you rather make yourself vulnerable to opinions.

>The picture on our web site, which I've read one faceless poster to
>desscribe as an
>"atrocious... tiny room..." was taken in our former barn of 2000
>square
>feet, with multi levels, windows and screened sitting areas.  

Take off your rose-colored glasses and look at that picture. It appears, to the
otherwise un-enlightened reader, to be a dank, dark, room with dozens of cats.
Look at it through the viewer's eyes, and put away your self-righteous
indignation. Try *showing* what a lovely, spacious area you claim to really
have! I daresay it would improve your chances for public support.

>I'm ashamed for the people in the world like Edwin, and perhaps some
>of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>may
>have some captive company in their dark, lonely lives.

Gina, you claim to be "ashamed" of people in the world like Edwin Hetrick, but
in reality, what are you doing? You're hanging on to all the negative, and it
appears you're using it as a selling tool on your website. And this thread?
You're bringing controversy to your shelter, nothing more.  Your animals, in
the long run, are the ones hurt. You could have chosen to graciously debate the
issues and provide more information, but instead you chose to
ADVERTISE it on your website and send a mass-mailing e-mail. You're fueling the
fire. Being familiar with the nature of usenet, I would not be surprised to see
that thread ignite very quickly. And there will be no one to blame but
yourself. Negativism, and controversy, will damage a shelter's credibility very
quickly.

I wish you the very best in your sheltering endeavors.

Sherry
Steve G - 29 Oct 2004 00:51 GMT
> It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and
> disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.
(...)

Welcome to Usenet.

You might want to work on your web site a bit. It's doing you no
favours as it stands!

HTH,
Steve.
Sunflower - 29 Oct 2004 16:02 GMT
     Complaints Hotline for PA Bureau of Charitible Organizations.

     ST-CHARITY@state.pa.us

     By Phone
     1-800-732-0999 (within PA)
     717-783-1720 (outside PA)

     In Writing
     Bureau of Charitable Organizations
     212 North Office Building
     Harrisburg, PA 17120

The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc.
P.O. Box 194
York New Salem, PA 17371

I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this group
with their hand out soliciting funds refuses to provide any information
about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or financial records, or
adoption statistics, or even their location.
Sunflower - 29 Oct 2004 16:13 GMT
>      Complaints Hotline for PA Bureau of Charitible Organizations.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> information about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or
> financial records, or adoption statistics, or even their location.

The reply from "Gina".

----- Original Message -----
From: LastResortAnimal@cs.com
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: From the President of THe Last Resort Animal Sanctuary,
Inc.

You have way too much time on your hands. Try volunteering, or maybe get a
job.

Nice.  Well, guess what.  It's the law that you answer my questions.  A
non-profit has provide these records to the public at their request, or
didn't you read the fine print? SO please do so.  Or have your charter
revoked. I've already posted a complaint to the PA Bureau of Charitible
Organizations about soliciting and not providing information. You may want
to refresh your memory.
http://www.dos.state.pa.us/char/cwp/view.asp?a=1092&q=431378#Exemptions You
want to escalate and get the newspapers involved?  Be my guest.  I'll be
waiting for the info to be either posted to me or to Usenet.

Fair warning:  I will publicly post on Usenet any and all correspondance
received from you or your group. Swallow your bile and play nice.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 29 Oct 2004 22:10 GMT
>I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this group
>with their hand out soliciting funds refuses to provide any information
>about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or financial records, or
>adoption statistics, or even their location.

What will be gained by this? Only the cats will lose in end regardless
if its a re homing shelter or a collector providing a safe haven.

If you don't want to contribute money then don't. If you want to
engage in debate and challenge the OP then feel free. This however, is
stupid with perhaps consequences you didn't intend.

-mhd.
Sunflower - 30 Oct 2004 18:18 GMT
>>I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this
>>group
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> What will be gained by this? Only the cats will lose in end regardless
> if its a re homing shelter or a collector providing a safe haven.

Have you ever dealt with collectors before?  I have. I wouldn't call what
they do "providing a safe haven"  These are the folks you read about that
have a
couple of hundred animals who are poorly cared for and even sickly.  A
collector, by definition, can't really be a rescue, because the animals are
overcrowded and suffering.

> If you don't want to contribute money then don't. If you want to
> engage in debate and challenge the OP then feel free. This however, is
> stupid with perhaps consequences you didn't intend.

Not providing information on your 501 c3 is a criminal offense, not just
stupidly bad PR.  If they
can't document what it is they do, then they do not deserve to enjoy that
status.  You can't just become a 501 c3 because you think more people will
contribute to your cause that way, even if it is a good cause.  It has
certain responsibilites.  The very minimum of which are making available to
anyone who asks information about the finances of the organization as well
as statistics on how well they accomplish the mission stated in their
incorporation, which is also required to be publically available
information.  If they had answered a single question about their adoption
policies, or how many animals they have, or really anything else, this
conversation would not be happening.  If they can't manage the business end
of being a rescue, then it would be far better to contribute their resources
and time to another rescue that *can* manage to comply with the legal
responsibilities.

I feed a feral colony.  But, I haven't incorporated myself as a 501 c3 in
order to do it. I know I don't have the patience or temperament suited to
dealing with the paperwork hassles.  Instead, I volunteer with a local
Humane Society that can help me, while I help them.  And, they do all of the
paperwork necessary to keep their charitible status.  And far, far, more
animals are helped by me doing this than if I tried to form my own rescue
group.

> -mhd.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 30 Oct 2004 21:01 GMT
>I feed a feral colony.  But, I haven't incorporated myself as a 501 c3 in
>order to do it. I know I don't have the patience or temperament suited to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>animals are helped by me doing this than if I tried to form my own rescue
>group.

How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now?

-mhd
jamie - 30 Oct 2004 21:43 GMT
> How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now?

It's not terribly clear that she's helping the cats that are there now
very much-- other than keeping them all under one roof and feeding
them.  They might actually find homes if another agency had them,
since she doesn't seem particularly interested in finding them homes,
nor providing veterinary care, just in taking them in for a fee.

Signature

 jamie  (jamiemck@newsguy.com)

         "There's a seeker born every minute."

hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 31 Oct 2004 06:34 GMT
>> How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>since she doesn't seem particularly interested in finding them homes,
>nor providing veterinary care, just in taking them in for a fee.

And it's equally not terribly clear that they would be better off
being removed from their current *shelter*. They could just end up in
an overcrowded shelter that euthanizes if the authorities from some
bureaucracy swoop in to shut down a supposed non compliant non-profit
shelter.

Its also not proven that there is anything intentionally fraudulent
about the non-profit status other than lack of due diligence to do the
paper work. Failure to dot the "i"s and cross the "t"s is not the same
thing as scamming. Until I hear about the cats actually being
neglected or suffering I will not support the petty act of tattle
tales to the bureaucrats as some kind of tactic in a newsgroup spat.

-mhd
Gandalf - 29 Oct 2004 23:01 GMT
I sent a small donation, despite the look of their web site.

I have not received any thanks for my donation. Maybe it wasn't big enough to
generate a 1 line E-mail thanking me for it....?

Very, very poor manners.

I'd like my money back; I have very little to spare....
PawsForThought - 30 Oct 2004 00:31 GMT
>From: g.gandalf@lycos.com  (Gandalf)

>I sent a small donation, despite the look of their web site.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>I'd like my money back; I have very little to spare....

Now that you've posted this, I'm sure you'll get a big thank you.  But then
again the way they talked about this newsgroup on their webbie, who knows.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.