Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / October 2004
From the President of THe Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Gina - 28 Oct 2004 18:21 GMT It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups. As President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to feel hurt, not to mention furious.
On July 22, 2002, The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc. became legally incorporated with the Pennsylvania Department Of State Corporation Bureau. Incorporated as a "Domestic Nonprofit Corporation, Entity # 3084565", we indeed CAN legally call ourselves a nonprofit corporation.
On August 30, 2002, The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc. was granted by The United States Internal Revenue Service the status of 501c3, tax-exmpt.
We were granted both the incorpration and the status because not only did we follow proper channels, we indeed adhere strictily to our Mission Statement, Article 2 of our Articles of Incrporation.
The primary objective of our mission is to provide life-long care to unwanted and abandoned domestic animals, and when possible find them new forever homes. Our adoption policy is strict. We make sure that any animal which leaves our shelter is moving on to a lifetime of love and care. If our policies deter someone, and they instead adopt from a "Kill" shelter, I'm pleased that an animal has been spared unnecessary euthanasia.
At The Last Resort, cats and bunnies enjoy a cage-free life. Because of this, surrenders are required to provide proof of spay/neuter, vaccines, etc., and must give a surrender fee of at least $50. Considering it costs any shelter an average of $700 per year to support one animal, I think our fee is a bargain.
I, as President, manage the administration of this shelter, it's website, and all operations. I have the help and support of my very dedicated staff: Nicole Newark, Ibai Munoz, Nathaniel Snyder, Lori Rodgers, Steve Smith, Heather Baublitz, Sandy Leathery and Joe Cartwright.
I, as Caretaker, am personally, daily involved in all aspects of the cats and rabbits of The Last Resort's care, welfare, and happiness. I do this every waking hour that I am not at my full-time job. I sleep very little. My clothes smell like cats. My home is my office. My answering macine is always blinking. My phone rings every day and night, including weekends.
I, as Founder, am deeply saddened that a few disassociated cyber posters, would defame the name and mission of a charity and it's people, who give everything, every spare moment, every spare penny, to enable the shelter to grow and flourish.
We work hard, together. We scoop poop, we vaccinate, we haul litter in our cars, we return calls to people who want to give up their life-long pet "just because", we trap, we fundraise, we beg, we bargain, we network, we laugh, we cry and then we laugh some more.
THis shelter IS legitimate not only because the state and federal government say so, but because of the love, blood, sweat, tears and joy we pour into it every day of our lives.
The picture on our web site, which I've read one faceless poster to desscribe as an "atrocious... tiny room..." was taken in our former barn of 2000 square feet, with multi levels, windows and screened sitting areas.
We indeed are registered with PetFinder.Com, our shelter # is PA295. When the farm was sold out from under us in July 2004, we relocated our animals in to 5 foster locations, one being a 50 acre private farm, with use of a 3000 square foot barn and a summer house. Our PetFinder site is temporarily hidden while we reorganize, repair our newly donated building, and continue to grow.
I'm ashamed for the people in the world like Edwin, and perhaps some of these cyber posters, who see the world through a veil of cynicism. It's as though they need to destroy what is good and joyous, so that they may have some captive company in their dark, lonely lives.
My email is always accepting. My phone always rings. ANyone with questions need only call or write. I'm damn proud of our Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, of our mission, and most importantly of our volunteers. Time and time again the outside shows me how lucky I and the cats and the bunnies are to have them. Thank you Nicole, Ibai, Nate, Lori, Steve, Heather, Sandy and Joe. I love you.
Gina Henderson, President/Founder 717-792-3203 caretaker@thelastresort.us lastresortanimal@cs.com www.thelastresort.us
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 18:28 GMT > It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and > disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups. [quoted text clipped - 101 lines] > lastresortanimal@cs.com > www.thelastresort.us From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in. I certainly would not want to support this organization. There will just be more and more animals, and something will eventually have to give--which is why you are resorting to soliciting funds online.
Diane L. Schirf - 29 Oct 2004 01:53 GMT > From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no > real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in. Huh?
 Signature http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
Mary - 29 Oct 2004 04:08 GMT > > From everything you say above, it is clear that you are a collector, with no > > real intentions of rehoming the animals you take in. > > Huh? That's my take on it.
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 18:31 GMT > It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups.
I would also like to suggest that before you decided to solicit funds in newsgroups, you should probably have made an effort to understand what Usenet is. There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 28 Oct 2004 19:44 GMT >There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an >international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate. Actually that is what Google does call usenet with the further confusing NEWS referring to news media. You have Web, Images, Groups News to pick from when you to conduct a search.
-mhd
Mary - 28 Oct 2004 20:20 GMT > >There is no such thing as "Google Groups," but Usenet is an > >international, unmoderated forum in which all may participate. > > Actually that is what Google does call usenet with the furtherconfusing NEWS referring to news media. You have Web, Images, GroupsNews to pick from when you to conduct a search.
> -mhd I know there is a "Google Groups" part of the search function, but the "prez" appears unaware that Usenet exists outside of Google, see what I mean?
Hey, how about them Bosox. :)
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 29 Oct 2004 04:37 GMT >Hey, how about them Bosox. :) Grrrr. Oh well, that will hold them 'til 2090.
-mhd
Mary - 29 Oct 2004 06:21 GMT > >Hey, how about them Bosox. :) > > Grrrr. Oh well, that will hold them 'til 2090. > > -mhd
:-) Most likely. KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 18:57 GMT > The primary objective of our mission is to provide life-long care to > unwanted and abandoned domestic animals, and when possible find them [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > "Kill" shelter, I'm pleased that an animal has been spared unnecessary > euthanasia. So you are not a shelter, with a focus of rehoming animals. You are a sanctuary. Again, I ask, why should a highly adoptable animal have to live in a sanctuary? IMHO, sanctuaries are for animals that have absolutely no other chance of having a forever home. Our shelter also has fairly strict guidelines, and we see about 3-4 adoptions a week, sometimes more. We also readily publish where we are located so people can f'n VISIT the shelter. Yes, we do get dumped animals sometimes. But you know what? I'm glad that people at least knew where we were and didn't take them to the municipal shelter or drown them in the river or something.
> At The Last Resort, cats and bunnies enjoy a cage-free life. Because > of this, surrenders are required to provide proof of spay/neuter, > vaccines, etc., and must give a surrender fee of at least $50. > Considering it costs any shelter an average of $700 per year to > support one animal, I think our fee is a bargain. What about the cats and bunnies that do not meet your criteria, or do not come with a handy $50? How does it cost $700/ year to support an animal that comes in fully vetted? At the shelter I'm with, we give priority to the stray cat who's not spayed/neutered and probably never seen a vet before, whether they come in with a donation or not. We look at it like this: by taking that intact cat off the streets, we saved that cat and any babies it may have produced. The owner turn-in who needs a new home because baby developed allergies or whatever can wait. We can work with them to keep the cat to a confined area until we have room, or some other solution.
Look, just about everyone who regularly participates on this newsgroup is either a volunteer or paid staffer at a shelter, or has a shelter they know and trust with their donations. You can't come on here and post, expecting an outpouring of support and money without people being suspicious.
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com
Sunflower - 28 Oct 2004 18:58 GMT You must be very new to both rescue and the internet indeed if you feel that a spam of newsgroups is the best method to raise funds for your animals. What other fundraising programs do you have? Certainly you receive some community support, yes? If not, then why not? Surely you have applied for grants from the PetSmart Foundation, the PetCo Foundation, Maddie's Fund and others? If not, why not?
Anyone who posts in cyberspace and isnt' a kook had better be willing to back up their statements with verifiable facts. That's just common sense and good security measures for someone to fact check. It is incumbent on the person stating the fact to provide verification of that fact, not someone who questions the information. Thus far, the only facts that you have provided have been that you are a 501 c3 organization. Fine. Lots of groups can get registered. Not that many make over the long haul. With your unwillingness to provide public information about your group and it's policies, it's fairly easy to see that you'll probably be one of those statistics that just don't make to the 5 year mark.
I will repeat the questions I posed in another thread in hopes that you will be more willing to share information about your group. It is public verified information that succeeds in drawing both volunteers and donors. A group that ducks questions while repeating that they are "certified" implies that they have something to hide. A non profit can NOT afford to have that reputation. So, please do share with the public the answers to my questions.
What are your adoption statistics? I'd be more than happy to tell you our shelter's. 80% of the animals that come through the door find homes, with 10% being euthanized for health reasons, and 10% for overcrowding. And we work damn hard to keep that rehomed figure that high.
How many cats do you take in and how many go out? We took in 282 cats last year and 450 dogs. 80% of them found homes.
How many cats are you currently housing? What is your adoption criteria? What is your adoption fee? How long does it take for a typical adoption to occur? What methods do you utilize to be sure that you find homes for these animals? None are listed on Petfinder and you don't have any information as to how to view the pets at all. Do you do remote location adoptions like at PetSmart?
Just how can one adopt an animal when there is no information about any of the animals or adoption proceedures?
Many "no kill" shelters are covers for collectors who take in far more animals than they can adequately provide care for, even with donations from the community. If "adoption doesn't happen often", then you have to ask yourself if you are in it for the animals benefit or not. Because it's not beneficial for any animal to *live* in a shelter situation. All animals deserve to own their own people to provide them with individual loving attention. And the fact that your group isn't very successful at doing this is a huge red flag.
Where can one go to see a copy of the minutes of the meetings of your organization as well as the required financial report information? That is required to be public information for any 501 c3 and ours is available at our shelter. Where is yours? A PO box isn't an acceptible location. Care to tell us how much money in fees were taken in last year? How about donations? Donations in kind? What were the outgoing expenses? What was the largest slice of that pie? I can tell you that veterinary expenses were approximately 85% of our approximately $34K budget, and our primary income was from adoption fees and one or two large donations. Care to be that candid about your group in public where it counts?
HSUS guidelines on feline housing will tell you exactly how much square footage a cat should be allotted. (Are you aware of what that figure is?) Any organization that does not abide by that is inhumane in it's housing policies. On that, we agree. Our shelter utilizes a cattery for our longer term residents as well. *We* spay and neuter and vaccinate the animals before they're allowed to run in there though. Every animal that comes through our doors leaves up to date on shots and spayed or neutered. These are just the costs of running a rescue. Where is the money going if you are not paying for vaccines and spay/neuter? You certainly can't have that big a light bill. Food is available by donation from grocery stores and chain stores. Cat litter is too. We get all of the burst bags free and therefore only have to purchase kitten food and backup litter supplies. If we can beg like this, surely your group can!
If you don't take any animals in that need spay/neuter or shots or testing, then you're not really running a rescue. And if you can't afford to provide these services to the animals that need them, perhaps you'd best reassess whether or not your group has the financial savvy to run a real rescue group. It's just like finding an animal a responsible home. It takes more than love. People who "love animals" and take in large number of them but don't provide them with any medical care from their own pocket or personal attention because of the large number of animals are COLLECTORS. And the really do believe that they are "saving animals". But the reality check is, they're actually creating more animal suffering, not less.
kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 19:22 GMT > It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and > disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups. > As > President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to > feel hurt, not to mention furious. Yet none of the really relevant questions have been answered.
Methinks thou protests too much.
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ Suicide is the most sincere form of self-criticism. http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 19:38 GMT Here's the website of one of our local cageless shelters. http://www.hhforcats.org/ Note obvious instructions for adopting, up-front fees, links to their petfinder listings (which actually have cats listed - 78 when I checked today), info on fundraising, and so on.
Here's another, even better, site. http://www.felinesinc.org/ This one also has their adoption application right on the website. They have 82 cats on petfinder.
None require vet checks or fees to take in cats. They both post a real address for people, right on the sites. They both rely on pure donations.
I'm not even going to go into the design of the site. ;)
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ Suicide is the most sincere form of self-criticism. http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 19:51 GMT > Here's another, even better, site. > http://www.felinesinc.org/ > This one also has their adoption application right on the website. > They have 82 cats on petfinder. Wow, you mean I can *see* which cats are available for adoption, and how I might go about adopting a cat? That's amazing!!
> I'm not even going to go into the design of the site. ;) I thought it was a pretty nice site. Well laid out, good format, color choice, etc.
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com
kaeli - 28 Oct 2004 21:13 GMT > > Here's another, even better, site. > > http://www.felinesinc.org/ [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Wow, you mean I can *see* which cats are available for adoption, and how I > might go about adopting a cat? That's amazing!! I know, right?
> > I'm not even going to go into the design of the site. ;) > > > I thought it was a pretty nice site. Well laid out, good format, color > choice, etc. I meant the OP's site wasn't all that, um, professional in appearance, in case that was unclear. Or did you mean you liked the white text on the maroon background with no apparent navigation of any kind and music running in the background?
I think the felinesinc.org one was very nice. Harmony House could use someone who knows color exists, IMO. *LOL*
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ Support your local medical examiner: die strangely! http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
KellyH - 28 Oct 2004 21:23 GMT > I meant the OP's site wasn't all that, um, professional in appearance, in > case that was unclear. Or did you mean you liked the white text on the > maroon > background with no apparent navigation of any kind and music running in > the > background? Gotcha. I thought you didn't like the Felines, Inc site. The OP site is rather bad, speaking as a web designer. I *hate* sites with music! And, their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up. Bleh.
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com
PawsForThought - 28 Oct 2004 22:25 GMT >From: "KellyH" Kelly@whatever.com
>I *hate* sites with music! And, >their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up. Bleh. I hate sites with music too. Nothing more obnoxious IMO. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
kaeli - 29 Oct 2004 13:53 GMT > Gotcha. I thought you didn't like the Felines, Inc site. The OP site is > rather bad, speaking as a web designer. I *hate* sites with music! You and me both. Especially when I'm at work and supposed to be working on OUR website. *LOL* (I'm a web applications geek)
> And, > their site makes a Real Player update thing pop up. Bleh. It didn't do that to me. I use Firefox, though, and it tends to not pop things up at me much.
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ Why do people who know the least know it the loudest? http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
PawsForThought - 28 Oct 2004 22:25 GMT >From: kaeli tiny_one@NOSPAM.comcast.net
>Here's the website of one of our local cageless shelters. >http://www.hhforcats.org/ >Note obvious instructions for adopting, up-front fees, links to their >petfinder listings (which actually have cats listed - 78 when I checked >today), info on fundraising, and so on. Well what do you know, they have an address. Imagine that! Wonder why the "Last Resort Animal Sanctuary" can't supply the same?
Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Sherry - 28 Oct 2004 22:05 GMT From the President, Last Resort Animal Sanctuary's post & mass e-mailing:
>It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and >disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups. Actually, the thread was neither. Anything posted on usenet is subject to opinion. You received several opinions which were based on the information you chose to share. You are welcome to offer further information in order to dispute any opinion. It's called debate. It's what usenet is made of.
>As >President, Founder, and primary Caretaker, I am resisting the urge to >feel hurt, not to mention furious. Imagine usenet as a street corner. Anything you post is subject to the opinions of many, many people. Don't take it personally. If you do, usenet is not for you. It is a discussion forum. You chose to *mis-use* the forum as a fundraising tool. You have no right to feel furious, or hurt. With that choice, you rather make yourself vulnerable to opinions.
>The picture on our web site, which I've read one faceless poster to >desscribe as an >"atrocious... tiny room..." was taken in our former barn of 2000 >square >feet, with multi levels, windows and screened sitting areas. Take off your rose-colored glasses and look at that picture. It appears, to the otherwise un-enlightened reader, to be a dank, dark, room with dozens of cats. Look at it through the viewer's eyes, and put away your self-righteous indignation. Try *showing* what a lovely, spacious area you claim to really have! I daresay it would improve your chances for public support.
>I'm ashamed for the people in the world like Edwin, and perhaps some >of [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >may >have some captive company in their dark, lonely lives. Gina, you claim to be "ashamed" of people in the world like Edwin Hetrick, but in reality, what are you doing? You're hanging on to all the negative, and it appears you're using it as a selling tool on your website. And this thread? You're bringing controversy to your shelter, nothing more. Your animals, in the long run, are the ones hurt. You could have chosen to graciously debate the issues and provide more information, but instead you chose to ADVERTISE it on your website and send a mass-mailing e-mail. You're fueling the fire. Being familiar with the nature of usenet, I would not be surprised to see that thread ignite very quickly. And there will be no one to blame but yourself. Negativism, and controversy, will damage a shelter's credibility very quickly.
I wish you the very best in your sheltering endeavors.
Sherry
Steve G - 29 Oct 2004 00:51 GMT > It has come to my attention that a particularly alarming, and > disrepectful thread has been posted to a newsgroup on Google Groups. (...)
Welcome to Usenet.
You might want to work on your web site a bit. It's doing you no favours as it stands!
HTH, Steve.
Sunflower - 29 Oct 2004 16:02 GMT Complaints Hotline for PA Bureau of Charitible Organizations.
ST-CHARITY@state.pa.us
By Phone 1-800-732-0999 (within PA) 717-783-1720 (outside PA)
In Writing Bureau of Charitable Organizations 212 North Office Building Harrisburg, PA 17120
The Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc. P.O. Box 194 York New Salem, PA 17371
I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this group with their hand out soliciting funds refuses to provide any information about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or financial records, or adoption statistics, or even their location.
Sunflower - 29 Oct 2004 16:13 GMT > Complaints Hotline for PA Bureau of Charitible Organizations. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > information about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or > financial records, or adoption statistics, or even their location. The reply from "Gina".
----- Original Message ----- From: LastResortAnimal@cs.com Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 8:42 AM Subject: Re: Fw: From the President of THe Last Resort Animal Sanctuary, Inc.
You have way too much time on your hands. Try volunteering, or maybe get a job.
Nice. Well, guess what. It's the law that you answer my questions. A non-profit has provide these records to the public at their request, or didn't you read the fine print? SO please do so. Or have your charter revoked. I've already posted a complaint to the PA Bureau of Charitible Organizations about soliciting and not providing information. You may want to refresh your memory. http://www.dos.state.pa.us/char/cwp/view.asp?a=1092&q=431378#Exemptions You want to escalate and get the newspapers involved? Be my guest. I'll be waiting for the info to be either posted to me or to Usenet.
Fair warning: I will publicly post on Usenet any and all correspondance received from you or your group. Swallow your bile and play nice.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 29 Oct 2004 22:10 GMT >I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this group >with their hand out soliciting funds refuses to provide any information >about themselves, including Board meeting minutes, or financial records, or >adoption statistics, or even their location. What will be gained by this? Only the cats will lose in end regardless if its a re homing shelter or a collector providing a safe haven.
If you don't want to contribute money then don't. If you want to engage in debate and challenge the OP then feel free. This however, is stupid with perhaps consequences you didn't intend.
-mhd.
Sunflower - 30 Oct 2004 18:18 GMT >>I'm sure they appreciate a couple of phone calls asking them why this >>group [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > What will be gained by this? Only the cats will lose in end regardless > if its a re homing shelter or a collector providing a safe haven. Have you ever dealt with collectors before? I have. I wouldn't call what they do "providing a safe haven" These are the folks you read about that have a couple of hundred animals who are poorly cared for and even sickly. A collector, by definition, can't really be a rescue, because the animals are overcrowded and suffering.
> If you don't want to contribute money then don't. If you want to > engage in debate and challenge the OP then feel free. This however, is > stupid with perhaps consequences you didn't intend. Not providing information on your 501 c3 is a criminal offense, not just stupidly bad PR. If they can't document what it is they do, then they do not deserve to enjoy that status. You can't just become a 501 c3 because you think more people will contribute to your cause that way, even if it is a good cause. It has certain responsibilites. The very minimum of which are making available to anyone who asks information about the finances of the organization as well as statistics on how well they accomplish the mission stated in their incorporation, which is also required to be publically available information. If they had answered a single question about their adoption policies, or how many animals they have, or really anything else, this conversation would not be happening. If they can't manage the business end of being a rescue, then it would be far better to contribute their resources and time to another rescue that *can* manage to comply with the legal responsibilities.
I feed a feral colony. But, I haven't incorporated myself as a 501 c3 in order to do it. I know I don't have the patience or temperament suited to dealing with the paperwork hassles. Instead, I volunteer with a local Humane Society that can help me, while I help them. And, they do all of the paperwork necessary to keep their charitible status. And far, far, more animals are helped by me doing this than if I tried to form my own rescue group.
> -mhd. hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 30 Oct 2004 21:01 GMT >I feed a feral colony. But, I haven't incorporated myself as a 501 c3 in >order to do it. I know I don't have the patience or temperament suited to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >animals are helped by me doing this than if I tried to form my own rescue >group. How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now?
-mhd
jamie - 30 Oct 2004 21:43 GMT > How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now? It's not terribly clear that she's helping the cats that are there now very much-- other than keeping them all under one roof and feeding them. They might actually find homes if another agency had them, since she doesn't seem particularly interested in finding them homes, nor providing veterinary care, just in taking them in for a fee.
 Signature jamie (jamiemck@newsguy.com)
"There's a seeker born every minute."
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 31 Oct 2004 06:34 GMT >> How does ratting her out help the cats that are there now? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >since she doesn't seem particularly interested in finding them homes, >nor providing veterinary care, just in taking them in for a fee. And it's equally not terribly clear that they would be better off being removed from their current *shelter*. They could just end up in an overcrowded shelter that euthanizes if the authorities from some bureaucracy swoop in to shut down a supposed non compliant non-profit shelter.
Its also not proven that there is anything intentionally fraudulent about the non-profit status other than lack of due diligence to do the paper work. Failure to dot the "i"s and cross the "t"s is not the same thing as scamming. Until I hear about the cats actually being neglected or suffering I will not support the petty act of tattle tales to the bureaucrats as some kind of tactic in a newsgroup spat.
-mhd
Gandalf - 29 Oct 2004 23:01 GMT I sent a small donation, despite the look of their web site.
I have not received any thanks for my donation. Maybe it wasn't big enough to generate a 1 line E-mail thanking me for it....?
Very, very poor manners.
I'd like my money back; I have very little to spare....
PawsForThought - 30 Oct 2004 00:31 GMT >From: g.gandalf@lycos.com (Gandalf)
>I sent a small donation, despite the look of their web site. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >I'd like my money back; I have very little to spare.... Now that you've posted this, I'm sure you'll get a big thank you. But then again the way they talked about this newsgroup on their webbie, who knows. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
|
|
|