Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / September 2005
Cats in surgery today
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ceb2 - 05 Oct 2004 17:01 GMT We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to get spayed and declawed. I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel bad enough, but we have our reasons. They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an easier recovery. I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct personality and I would hate for that to change.
I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A DEBATE!
Mary - 05 Oct 2004 17:18 GMT > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! I declawed and spayed my cat at the same time, just as you are doing. Why? Because I was an idiot. Young and ignorant. You are an idiot, and really cruel for doing both the spay and the declaw at the same time when you knew damned well what the declaw entails. You can look forward to biting, mistrust, and inappropriate elimination. When you can get them to go in the box they probably won't cover it up. I kept my mutilated girl for her entire 20-year life. Now that you have done the Nazi thing, that is the least you can do. I hope you pick them up the same day so you can see how much they are suffering, but I expect your vet will keep them so that you don't know.
I am very, very happy for your furniture and drapery. But Karma is a bitch, babe Believe me, I know.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 05 Oct 2004 17:31 GMT >I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A >DEBATE! Well don't come here looking for anything else if you chose to do this barbaric procedure that is banned in most of the world.
-mhd
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:33 GMT >>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A >>DEBATE! Then why don't you just f.ck off. People here are cat lovers and don't enjoy hearing from people who like to mutilate them. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
CatNipped - 05 Oct 2004 17:38 GMT Take a look at what they're doing to your sweet little kittens and then ask not to be flamed here...
http://community-2.webtv.net/stopdeclaw/declawpics/
Hugs,
CatNipped
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! Elizabeth Blake - 05 Oct 2004 18:16 GMT > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to > get spayed and declawed. > I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel > and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel > bad enough, but we have our reasons.
> They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their > procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation > and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an > easier recovery. Much more humane?!?! I seriously doubt that.
> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect > their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct > personality and I would hate for that to change. Well, they may end up becoming somewhat nasty and prone to biting, to make up for you ripping their claws out.
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! -- Liz
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:35 GMT >> They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their >> procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation >> and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an >> easier recovery. That is total bullshit. Declawing entails amputating the third phlanx of each toe along with the claw. I have heard of this Banfield Hospital. I can't remember where but if I recall correctly, they are listed at the Declaw Hall of Shame website. They are lying to you pure and simple. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
MacCandace - 09 Oct 2004 04:44 GMT << I have heard of this Banfield Hospital. I can't remember where but if I recall correctly, they are listed at the Declaw Hall of Shame website >>
Here in the Phoenix area, Banfield is the vet group that is in the local Petsmarts.
Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)
See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace
"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely)
Cat Protector - 09 Oct 2004 04:51 GMT They aren't that cheap though.
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> Here in the Phoenix area, Banfield is the vet group that is in the local > Petsmarts. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > other > than human." (Loren Eisely) Sherry - 09 Oct 2004 05:30 GMT >They aren't that cheap though. Cheap really shouldn't be a criteria for choosing a vet, though.
Sherry
cmtowle - 05 Oct 2004 18:55 GMT > They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their > procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation > and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an > easier recovery. If they are *not* doing a full amputation of the distal phalanx (last toe bone) of each toe, they are cutting *through* the bone. This method is generally thought of as causing more complications than the full amputation of the distal phalanx which itself can cause a host of medical complications. You are not getting current or accurate information. If they *are* removing the entire the last toe bone, they are using the prevalent method and are lying to you. If they are saying that the procedure is "much more humane", they are lying to you. Elective declawing, by definition, is inhumane. It is unnecessary surgery which puts cats at risk during and post surgery, it is done solely for owner convenience, changes a cat's gait and balance, and deprives cats of so much that is unique to cats. If you elected to have this procedure done knowing full well what is involved rather than provide them with and spend some time teaching them to use "acceptable" scratching posts/surfaces allowing them to express instinctive behaviour which serves many functions, you do not have your kitties' best interests at heart. How sad for these wonderful creatures.
> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect > their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct > personality and I would hate for that to change. Then why elect to subject them to a procedure which has the potential of doing just that?
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! Since you expected that this would be the case, it implies that you did some research - all the more distressing that you made this choice for these innocent beings.
M.
Sherry - 05 Oct 2004 19:03 GMT >We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock >(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A >DEBATE! Right. So you posted just to let us know. Why post at all? Trollass.
Sherry
Mary - 05 Oct 2004 19:15 GMT > >We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > >(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Sherry heh. Dumbass is more like it. Like you only get what you are "looking for" in Usenet. Dickhead.
Cat Protector - 05 Oct 2004 19:07 GMT I can understand the spaying but why torture them by having them declawed? If you feel so bad then why are you having them declawed?
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! Mary - 05 Oct 2004 19:15 GMT > I can understand the spaying but why torture them by having them declawed? > If you feel so bad then why are you having them declawed? Ceb2 DOES NOT FEEL BAD, CP.
Cat Protector - 05 Oct 2004 22:21 GMT That seems obvious. Those that declaw after knowing the facts don't often have a change of heart.
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> Ceb2 DOES NOT FEEL BAD, CP. dgk - 05 Oct 2004 20:21 GMT >We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock >(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A >DEBATE! You're an a.shole.
KellyH - 05 Oct 2004 21:04 GMT > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! People who declaw without knowing any better make me sad, but declawing even AFTER you researched is just f.cking cruel! Yes, I'm breaking my own anti-cursing rule because this warrants it!! How can you research declawing and still but your sweet little kittens through that?? I had my cat Dash(RB) declawed, but I do plead ignorance on that. I was 16 when I got her, and she was a swiper, and my parents didn't like having the furniture scratched, so off to be declawed. She was a biter, and never covered her poop. She was a tempermental cat anyway, so I can't really say if the declawing had any effect on that. That animal hospital either doesn't know what they are talking about, or is flat-out lying to you. Thanks for posting their name so we can all bombard them with calls. If you weren't looking for a debate or to be flamed, you came to the wrong place!
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com
zuzu22@webtv.net - 05 Oct 2004 22:02 GMT >We have three 5 month old kittens; >Princess Consuela Bananahammock [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >flingers. I already feel bad enough, but we >have our reasons. You *should* feel bad. Inflicting pain and totally unnecessary amputations on 3 innocent kittens who depend on you to care for them humanely and with kindness is unconscionable. Did it ever occur to you that if you feel bad about this, maybe you shouldn't go through with it? You knew about this newsgroup so why aren't you posting asking for help with whatever clawing issues you had so we could help you and the kittens wouldn't have to suffer unnecessarily?
>They are at Banfield Animal Hospital Oh yeah, Banfield, which is AFAIC the "dollar store" of vet clinics and has, IMO, some of the most unethical people I've come across.
>who have assured us that their >procedure is much more humane because >they don't do a full amputation and that >since they are being spayed at the same >time, it will be an easier recovery. They lied to you. First of all, it goes against all common sense to think that putting a kitten through major abdominal surgery *and* 10 separate and painful amputations at the same time is "easier" on them than just doing a spay.
Second, if they don't do a complete amputation the kitten is at an even greater risk for complications and resulting pain, etc. I did a little googling and found out that you live in the Waterbury, CT area. There is a Banfield Hospital located there so I called to inquire about how they declaw cats. I got two different answers. The person that answered the phone said they just take the nail out, then the vet (a very *young* sounding vet) got on the phone and said that she does a complete disarticulation of the first joint. In other words, a complete amputation.
If this is the hospital you are using they have intentionally deceived you. What I found even more shocking was that the vet, obviously defensive, went on to say that, and this is a direct quote, "they are up and walking around the next day as if nothing happened." This is such complete and utter bullshit, and this vet intentionally made it sound as though declawing is no big deal. She was selling it for all she was worth. I was absolutely disgusted.
I also noticed in my search that your wife was in a serious car accident a few years ago and had some pretty bad injuries. Knowing the kind of pain that your wife suffered partly as a result of bone trauma, it is mystifying to me how you could intentionally inflict the same pain and trauma multiple times on innocent kittens.
>I am looking for insight from owners of >declawed cats. Should I expect their >behavior to be the same? They all have >their own distinct personality and I would >hate for that to change. Click on the link to my photo album and read about Mister Mistopheles and what happened to him as a result of being declawed. He was *lucky* that he got saved from the grim reaper. Most cats in his situation aren't. While you're at it, read why a shelter in Jersey doesn't allow cats they adopt out to be declawed anymore:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&selm=22243-3E7A7ABC- 87%40storefull-2138.public.lawson.webtv.net
>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI >DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I >LOOKING FOR A DEBATE! This is a public forum and people are free to say anything they choose. You've been on Usenet long enough to know that what you want and what you get are often two entirely different things. Your defensiveness is a clear indicator that you know what you are doing is wrong. I'm hoping that in reality you haven't really gone through with it yet and there's still time to save these kittens from what is an extremely barbaric and cruel act. If that's the case, I and others here would be more than willing to help you find ways to deal humanely with whatever scratching issues you have.
Megan
 Signature
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke
Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com
Zuzu's Cats Photo Album: http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22
"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his way."
- W.H. Murray
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 00:11 GMT > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! To all of you:
F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!! None of you know me none of you know my situation. You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than a softball. She was our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding her. We nursed her back to health and she is perfectly fit now. Roxie was second. She came from the Connecticut humane society. No one wanted her. She was mean, aggressive, and hissed at any person or cat who came near her. We took a chance and she gets along great with Princess and the new one. Grizabella came from the Waterbury CT dog pound. She ended up there because the pet store couldn't sell her. She was the runt of the litter, already scheduled for euthansia. She came home with a yeast infection in her ears, worms, and kennel cough. That's right kennel cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops for three weeks.
So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in perhaps more than one case, exsistance period.
We had a chance to see them this afternoon a matter of hours after the surgery and all are doing fine. Tired but fine. They are all eating and Roxie is trying to play with the other two.
I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites.
If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously, these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 00:24 GMT I have to agree with the group here. Knowingly declawing after have gathered all the facts is disgusting. I have to wonder where your conscious was? It wasn't as if these cats were declawed before you rescued them. Your having these cats declawed was a very abusive act. It is sad that you would first post your intentions of declawing but even sadder acting as if you are proud of it. These cats depended on you to keep them safe and you violated their trust. You should ashamed of yourself!
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> To all of you: > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 13:47 GMT > I have to agree with the group here. Knowingly declawing after have gathered > all the facts is disgusting. I have to wonder where your conscious was? It [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > of it. These cats depended on you to keep them safe and you violated their > trust. You should ashamed of yourself! Whao! I NEVER said I was proud of it. In fact, I am anything but.
> > To all of you: > > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want > > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 16:51 GMT Then why did you announce that you are declawing the cats on here despite knowing all the facts that it was a cruel and painful practice? A person like you does not deserve an animal as wonderful as a cat. You deserved the criticism and anger from this group. It was absolutely horrible what you did to those cats. Then you have the nerve to swear and curse at those of us who love cats and care for them. Don't you realize that by having those cats declawed that you not only tortured them but also took away their main line of defense against predators should they ever get outside? You did a mean and cruel act and now you will have to live with the guilt but so far you seem to have no conscious. Shame on you!
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> Whao! I NEVER said I was proud of it. In fact, I am anything but. > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >> > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want >> > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. Mary - 06 Oct 2004 01:06 GMT "ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote > To all of you:
> None of you know me none of you know my situation. You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than a softball. She was our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding her. We nursed
> her back to health and she is perfectly fit now. Roxie was second. She came from the Connecticut humane society. No one wanted her. She was mean, aggressive, and hissed at any person or cat who came near her.
> We took a chance and she gets along great with Princess and the new one. Grizabella came from the Waterbury CT dog pound. She ended up there because the pet store couldn't sell her. She was the runt of the
> litter, already scheduled for euthansia. She came home with a yeast infection in her ears, worms, and kennel cough. That's right kennel cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops for three weeks.
And so you feel entitled to MUTILATE these poor babies who have been through so much? What an a.shole.
> We had a chance to see them this afternoon a matter of hours after the surgery and all are doing fine. Tired but fine. They are all eating
> and Roxie is trying to play with the other two. Bullshit. Did you see them try to touch their toes to the floor and jerk and flinch? Lying a.shole
> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all > did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites. > > If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously, > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. Yeah, they are so wonderful you mutilated them.
cmtowle - 06 Oct 2004 01:39 GMT > snipped......None of you know me none of you know my > situation. What truly matters in this group are your cats and their welfare. No matter what your situation, choosing to declaw cats having all of the information and help for alternatives available is indefensible. You simply cannot justify, ethically or medically, your choice to amputate the ends of your cats' toes.
>You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued > from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops > for three weeks. This is what is so mystifying. You had the heart to save these suffering cats and yet you knowingly subject them to more pain and suffering for your convenience. Have these poor animals not been through enough?
> So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We > gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in > perhaps more than one case, exsistance period. Making the decision to provide a home for abused, ill, and abandoned cats only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or compassion, no matter how you put it.
...snipped....
> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all > did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites. Why are we hypocrites? The welfare of cats is a top priority amongst the majority here. Therefore, the inflicting of unnecessary pain and risk is unacceptable.
> If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously, > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. Indeed because they are so wonderful, some of us are distressed that you would choose to amputate the ends of their toes rather than provide them with a feline-friendly environment where they can happily express instinctive scratching behaviour.
That you were aware of what declawing entails, that you could access this and other groups for help before making your choice, and that you chose to declaw anyway makes it even more reprehensible.
M.
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 13:53 GMT > > snipped......None of you know me none of you know my > > situation. [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or > compassion, no matter how you put it. So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?
> ...snipped.... > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > M. Sherry - 06 Oct 2004 15:23 GMT >> Making the decision to provide a home for abused, ill, and abandoned cats >> only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or >> compassion, no matter how you put it. > >So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, >or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? Arrggh. Deja moo. Big time deja moo. The feeling we've all heard this bulls*t before. The cold, hard fact is, if you can't live with a clawed cat, you shouldn't have gotten a cat to begin with. There are no circumstances that make it "OK" to mutilate them. None.
Sherry
Mary - 06 Oct 2004 15:50 GMT > So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, > or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? Those were not the only choices. YOU made them the only choices by being too lazy and selfish to simply train them to scratch appropriate surfaces. Shame on you.
---MIKE--- - 06 Oct 2004 15:01 GMT Can't all you people see that the OP must be a troll. Why would anyone want to post a notice of intent to declaw on a newsgroup that they KNOW is anti-declaw? Only to stir things up.
---MIKE---
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 15:53 GMT > So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, > or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? The old emotional blackmail routine, again, "declaw or death".
What would you have done if declawing wasn't legally an option? Would you have left the kittens "undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, or stuck in a cage"?
http://maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
cmtowle - 06 Oct 2004 16:20 GMT ...snipped...
> > > So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We > > > gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, > or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? Again - making declawing a condition of rescuing ill, starving, and abandoned cats is unconscionable, indefensible and cruel. Good deeds do not erase inhumane acts. Good deeds do not make cruelty permissible.
Your question pre-supposes that you had only two options. Rescue them and declaw them, or abandon them to their horrible fates. It is a convenient way of seeing things, but it is an incorrect and cowardly way of living. The cats you rescued would be better off in a loving, feline-friendly home where they are treated with the compassion they deserve. They would be better off in a home where they are treated with patience, caring, and love. This means taking the little time it takes to provide them with "acceptable" alternatives to scratch. It means allowing them to express instinctive scratching behaviour to their hearts' content. It means accepting their uniqueness which provides them with so much pleasure apart from serving several functions. It means loving them for the wonderful creatures they are complete with the claws they come with.
It means never doing intentional harm.
M.
...snipped...
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 16:55 GMT What does saving them have to do with declawing? You could have saved them and not declawed. You decided to declaw not only out of laziness but also out of cruelty. You could have trimmed their claws and also taught the the cats to use a scratching post.
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com
> So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, > or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:51 GMT >From: svendlho@aol.com (ceb2)
>So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, >or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws? I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their ends of their toes chopped off. Now they will suffer for the rest of their lives because of your selfish cruel act. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
teri - 09 Oct 2004 02:05 GMT >I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their >ends of their toes chopped off. That statement is way over the top. But of course you already know that ;-) teri
Mary - 09 Oct 2004 03:54 GMT > >I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their > >ends of their toes chopped off.
> That statement is way over the top. But of course you already know > that ;-) > teri When one has the choice to save a cat and keep it whole and chooses to mutilate--that is behavior that is "over the top." You, too clearly believe that as humans it is our right not to be inconvenienced even if it means mutilating domesticated animals who trust and depend on us. Now that is what I call really over the top. It might be fine in alt.I'm.human.and.can.do.any.evil.f.cking.thing.want.to ha.ha.ha, but in a cat group you and your good AOL buddy "LuvsToTortureCatsIQOOO" might just get a few negative responses.
-L. : - 09 Oct 2004 07:47 GMT > >I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their > >ends of their toes chopped off. > That statement is way over the top. But of course you already know > that ;-) > teri Not really. The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable. I have met many who would have been much better off having been euthanized.
-L.
Steve G - 11 Oct 2004 22:51 GMT (...)
> Not really. The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable. I > have met many who would have been much better off having been > euthanized. Many, perhaps - but that's not all. Automatically saying a cat would be better dead than missing its toes is a bit deranged, really, even if declawing is a terrible thing. I hope you don't think that human amputees are better off dead!
Steve.
MaryL - 11 Oct 2004 23:50 GMT > (...) >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Steve. In my opinion, it really is an extreme (and incorrect stance) to automatically assume that a cat is better off dead than declawed. In my opinion, the problem is that it should not be an "either/or" option -- there is no reason to assume that a cat needs to be either declawed or euthanized. Instead, why not learn to love a cat for what it is (including claws) and work on showing a cat how to use scratching posts. After all, would anyone dare to suggest cutting off the tips of a child's fingers if the child smeared food on the walls? Of course not!!! Likewise, there is no need to declaw a cat simply because a person wants nice furniture. Cats can be trained! Claws can also be trimmed, and some people use alternatives such as "soft paws" (an alternative that I have never needed because I have found it remarkably easy to train each of my cats to use scratching posts -- one simply needs to provide a variety of surfaces and make the posts readily available to cats by positioning them in various rooms).
MaryL
-L. : - 12 Oct 2004 05:59 GMT > > (...) > >> > >> Not really. The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable. I > >> have met many who would have been much better off having been
> >> euthanized. > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > MaryL The truth is, however, that *many* people use the "declaw this cat or I will put it down" blackmail threat when they approach their vets for declawing. IME, if the vet is resistant at all, this is usually what is thrown out as a retort. Sad, but true.
My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a loving, permanent home - because if someone is willing to euthanize a cat for clawing it is unlikely they will be tolerant of other cat behaviors.
-L.
Sherry - 12 Oct 2004 06:06 GMT >My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off >surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >-L. That's the way I've always thought. If someone can't tolerate claws, they're not going to put up with peeing / pooping outside the box, cat hair all over the place, and all the other things we all here probably just take in stride. Declaw or Die is so bogus. That's how the vet I use justifies the fact that he declaws, that he's "saving" them from being dumped in a shelter. He submitted an article on that very topic to our newsletter, and being the fascist editor that I am, I wouldn't print it. In retrospect, I should have printed it, then written a rebuttal. I missed a golden opportunity. Sherry
Phil P. - 12 Oct 2004 07:30 GMT > >My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off > >surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > written a rebuttal. I missed a golden opportunity. > Sherry Gary Landsberg - a self-proclaimed Canadian "behaviorist", uses the declaw or death/surrender routine all the time and is probably single-handedly responsible for that attitude in the general population. Here's one of his more notable statements:
"Perhaps the most startling statistic is that an estimated 50% of all declawed cats would not have been kept by their owners had they not been declawed. This means that in the province of Ontario (Canada) alone, where approximately 100,000 cats are declawed each year, as many as 50,000 cats would not have had homes if they had not been declawed." (100K declaws/yr. - that's a lot of money)
Yngver found another statement by Landsberg that said 98% of the people who had their cats declawed would have kept their cats if they could not be declawed...
Declawing is similar to the annual vaccination fallacy that needs to exposed publicly on a national level.
Phil
Steve G - 12 Oct 2004 18:28 GMT (...)
> The truth is, however, that *many* people use the "declaw this cat or > I will put it down" blackmail threat when they approach their vets for > declawing. IME, if the vet is resistant at all, this is usually what > is thrown out as a retort. Sad, but true. TBH, in these cases I think the vet should be able to say 'Go on then - they're your morals, and it'll be your guilt', or somesuch.
> My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off > surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a > loving, permanent home - Quite possibly. However, this is a different stance than saying that declawed cats would be better off dead!
> because if someone is willing to euthanize a > cat for clawing it is unlikely they will be tolerant of other cat > behaviors. Yes.
Steve.
-L. : - 13 Oct 2004 05:00 GMT > (...) > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > TBH, in these cases I think the vet should be able to say 'Go on then > - they're your morals, and it'll be your guilt', or somesuch. IME, vets aren't reluctant to declaw when the "euth or declaw" line is used. They declaw. The vet I worked for, I estimate made about 90-100K income on declaws every year.
> > My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off > > surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a > > loving, permanent home - > > Quite possibly. However, this is a different stance than saying that > declawed cats would be better off dead! Yet, as I said before, many cats are MUCH better off dead than living in their miserable declawed state.
-L.
-L. : - 12 Oct 2004 06:01 GMT > (...) > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Steve. My brother is a human an and for many, many years he would have answered that statement with "Yes, I would have been better off dead". Having seen what he went through, there is no way I could *ever* advocate declawing (not that I would, anyway, besed on my experience as a vet tech).
-L.
Steve G - 12 Oct 2004 17:50 GMT (...)
> My brother is a human an and for many, many years he would have > answered that statement with "Yes, I would have been better off dead". For many years ... but not for his whole life?
Regardless, there are always exceptions, and there are also exceptional people who do more with missing bits than most people with the full complement of limbs. Christopher Reeve is an apposite example at this time (OK, he wasn't actually an amputee). Norman Croucher is an excellent example, too (http://www.normancroucher.co.uk/index.htm).
> Having seen what he went through, there is no way I could *ever* > advocate declawing (not that I would, anyway, besed on my experience > as a vet tech). Yes, but there's a big difference between disagreeing with declawing and suggesting that all declawed cats would be better off dead.
S.
kaeli - 12 Oct 2004 19:37 GMT > Yes, but there's a big difference between disagreeing with declawing > and suggesting that all declawed cats would be better off dead. Which is better - a life in constant pain, or death?
How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to live with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice?
How many cats who are declawed experience constant pain? We don't know. Maybe all. Maybe none. Maybe 50%.
What if it's not severe pain, but more of a "phantom" pain, like amputees say they get? What if it comes and goes?
There are so many things we don't know about declawing because the cats can't tell us. I wouldn't say that all cats who are declawed are better off dead, but I would say that I myself would rather be dead than live a life of constant pain.
Just rambling. Sorry. :)
 Signature -- ~kaeli~ If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success? http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
Phil P. - 12 Oct 2004 20:05 GMT > How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us > about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to live > with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice? > > How many cats who are declawed experience constant pain? We don't know. Maybe > all. Maybe none. Maybe 50%. Here's an excerpt from the chapter on onychectomy in Small Animal Surgery (2nd ed) by Theresa Welch Fossum - one of the most widely used surgical texts. Doesn't say "constant" pain - but temporary is bad enough since there's no medical benefit for the cat:
"Complications (i.e., pain, hemorrhage, pad damage, lameness, swelling, infection, claw regrowth, second phalanx protrusion, and palmargrade stance) occur in 50% of patients. "
There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention it deserves. Cats enjoy scratching.
Phil
Sherry - 12 Oct 2004 21:32 GMT >There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention >it deserves. Cats enjoy scratching. > >Phil Yeah, that's a point that sometimes gets lost in the fray. Cats enjoy their claws. They scratch because it exercises their limbs and paws, and it just plain feels good. It's shameful to take that away from them.
Sherry
Phil P. - 13 Oct 2004 03:55 GMT > >There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention > >it deserves. Cats enjoy scratching. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Sherry I really get pissed of every time I hear a declawer say "my cat still scratches". Yeah, they go through the motion from instinct but they don't get the enjoyment or benefit from digging their claws in and pulling back. Its like doing a chin up without the bar or rowing without the oars.
The declawing surveys only address the clients' attitude towards the cats' behavior. As long as the cat doesn't develop behavior or medical problems that affect the owner, they're satisfied. What about the cat?
I think its a horrible thing to do to a trusting, sensitive individual.
Phil
Steve G - 13 Oct 2004 18:59 GMT (...)
> Which is better - a life in constant pain, or death? An unanswerable question. How much pain? Again, people do choose chronic pain (e.g., fibromyalgia) over death. Not much of a choice, mind.
> How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us > about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to > live with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice? Difficult to know and, as you say, by definition they have to learn to live with it (if the pain is present) - don't think cats can commit suicide.
(...)
> What if it's not severe pain, but more of a "phantom" pain, like amputees > say they get? What if it comes and goes? This is an interesting point, and one I mentioned in a declawing thread recently. Phantom pain is fairly common in amputees and can be resistant to conventional painkillers.
(...)
> I wouldn't say that all cats who are declawed are better off dead, but I > would say that I myself would rather be dead than live a life of constant > pain. Thing is, I don't think you can even know this for yourself without actually being in the situation.
Lots of uncertainties, but I still think it's off the wall to suggest that, in general, most declawed cats would be better dead.
Steve.
PawsForThought - 09 Oct 2004 20:04 GMT >From: teri teric@enter.net
>>I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having >their >>ends of their toes chopped off. >That statement is way over the top. But of course you already know >that ;-) >teri Not to me a.shole ;) ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
teri - 10 Oct 2004 04:07 GMT >>>I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having >>their [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Not to me a.shole ;) name calling, very mature. what are you in third grade.
fwiw I would never declaw a cat, but there is one who has been declawed laying next to me now purring herself to sleep. of course you think all declawed cats are better off dead. teri
Wendy - 06 Oct 2004 03:07 GMT > > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!! I'd prefer not to and the cat/s might take care of the biting.
For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have had yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to be at risk from the surgery, the pain, anesthesia (they had to be under longer than if they were just in for a neutering) and potential after effects of this procedure. For the cats sakes I hope their surgery goes well and they heal without complication but you took a irreversible risk with these babies without even giving them a chance to see if you could train them to use their claws where appropriate.
I've fostered 18 kittens this summer. Their ages when they came in my home ranged from 2 weeks to 3 mos old. 11 of them were older kittens who were scared to death and didn't hesitate to scratch and bite at first. One of them would leap across the cage hissing and trying to bite and scratch just because someone looked at her.I also had to deal with health problems. They all had ear mites and diarrhea. One litter was very underweight because there mother was run over by a car before they were old enough to take care of themselves adequately. Their inauspicious start didn't stop them from learning how to live in a household without doing damage with their claws. Every one of them learned to use the cat tree and scratching posts. None of them use claws on people. They all let me clip their claws. They all will be able to live in a home without doing damage with their claws providing their people provide them with an appropriate scratching post/cat tree. It's very easy to train young kittens to use a scratching post/cat tree. It's almost as easy as litter training them and a lot easier than weaning them. I can only assume you didn't want to be bothered trying to teach them.
As I said I hope they are all right. I hope they don't end up biting or urinating on your rugs or furniture. But you chose to take that risk and there is no going back so it's really no wonder people have little patience with your choice.
W
Mary - 06 Oct 2004 03:55 GMT > For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have had yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to be at risk from the surgery, the pain, anesthesia (they had to be under longer than if they were just in for a neutering) and potential after effects of this procedure. For the cats sakes I hope their surgery goes well and they heal without complication but you took a irreversible risk with these babies without even giving them a chance to see if you could train them to usetheir claws where appropriate.
> I've fostered 18 kittens this summer. Their ages when they came in my home ranged from 2 weeks to 3 mos old. 11 of them were older kittens who were scared to death and didn't hesitate to scratch and bite at first. One of
> them would leap across the cage hissing and trying to bite and scratch just because someone looked at her.I also had to deal with health problems. They all had ear mites and diarrhea. One litter was very underweight because there mother was run over by a car before they were old enough to take care of themselves adequately. Their inauspicious start didn't stop them from learning how to live in a household without doing damage with their claws. Every one of them learned to use the cat tree and scratching posts. None of them use claws on people. They all let me clip their claws. They all will be able to live in a home without doing damage with their claws providing their people provide them with an appropriate scratching post/cat tree. It's very easy to train young kittens to use a scratching post/cat tree. It's almost as easy as litter training them and a lot easier than weaning them. I can only assume you didn't want to be bothered trying to teach them.
> As I said I hope they are all right. I hope they don't end up biting or urinating on your rugs or furniture. But you chose to take that risk and there is no going back so it's really no wonder people have little patience
> with your choice. Well, Wendy, your post just made me cry. You put it best of all, and it means more coming from you because you took in all these little cats in one summer and did such a beautiful job with them. Whereas this "ceb2" person did a few nice things for three kittens then clearly thought "hell, I've put enough out for them, it's time for ME and my conveniencd," like he/she has somehow paid for the right to mutilate the cats. Which makes me cry even more. And I'm not even pmsing. Nice post. Poor babies. I hope all the selfish SOBs in the world get up in the middle of the night and stub their miserable toes tonight. Bastards.
Wendy - 06 Oct 2004 12:55 GMT > > For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have > had yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > selfish SOBs in the world get up in the middle of the night and stub their > miserable toes tonight. Bastards. I think what gets me more than anything is when people have the cats de-clawed when there isn't even a problem. I have overheard too many people announce proudly that they had their cats neutered and de-clawed like this is a sign of a good owner. The cats hadn't been picking at anything they just de-clawed on GP. Then there are the people that haul the poor kitty off to the vet after the first time they pick at anything. They don't even try to provide an appropriate place for the cat to scratch just haul them off to lose the end of their toes You can't undo a de-claw. If it goes badly it's forever. That's a heck of a risk to take before exhausting all other alternatives.
I can't say I have extensive experience with de-clawed cats. All of mine have had claws. My niece OTOH has had two that were de-clawed when she adopted them. The first wasn't the friendliest cat but didn't have any paw health issues and used the box reliably. I'm not willing to blame the stand-offish personality on the de-claw because I don't know what this cat was like before the procedure. The second cat was the sweetest boy who urinated all over her house because he had one toe that wouldn't heal. It kept on splitting open and bleeding. The message I got from this is that the de-claw surgery is a bit of a crap shoot. If all goes well I suppose the owner could go neener neener see it's not a problem. But if it doesn't and the cat develops other undesirable behaviors then what? You can't paste the ends of their toes back on. There is no undo.
People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their panty hose.
W
MaryL - 10 Oct 2004 16:29 GMT > People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their > panty hose. > > W As an addendum: Many people do seem to think that declawing is as simple as removing a person's toenail. In fact, I thought that myself many years ago -- fortunately, I learned better and never put any of my cats through this cruel procedure. Ironically, I did have to have the sides of my own big toenails surgically removed when I was in 7th grade. However, that procedure involved removing only the *roots* at the side of the nails (and most of the root and nail remain intact, to the extent that anyone looking at my feet would not notice anything). And, of course, the actual toe was not damaged. This is not *at all* what declawing involves in a cat, which involves partial amputation. I realize that most people who read this will already be aware of the difference, but I thought it might be worth mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only of the claws.
MaryL
Mary - 10 Oct 2004 17:20 GMT > > People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their > > panty hose. > > > > W > > As an addendum: Many people do seem to think that declawing is as simple as removing a person's toenail. In fact, I thought that myself many years ago -- fortunately, I learned better and never put any of my cats through this cruel procedure. Ironically, I did have to have the sides of my own big toenails surgically removed when I was in 7th grade. However, that procedure involved removing only the *roots* at the side of the nails (and most of the root and nail remain intact, to the extent that anyone looking at my feet would not notice anything). And, of course, the actual toe was not damaged. This is not *at all* what declawing involves in a cat, which involves partial amputation. I realize that most people who read this will
> already be aware of the difference, but I thought it might be worth mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only of the claws.
> MaryL Thanks MaryL, it is worth mentioning as there are people out here who think that. That is exactly what I thought it was when I had it done to Gnarly. I thought her little feet would be the same only no sharp pointy claws. Stupid? You bet. But that's what "declaw" sounds like. Maybe they ought to call it "toe amputation."
MaryL - 10 Oct 2004 17:47 GMT >> > People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in > their [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Stupid? You bet. But that's what "declaw" sounds like. Maybe they ought to > call it "toe amputation." That's exactly what they should call it! Maybe we should start a trend.
MaryL
PawsForThought - 10 Oct 2004 21:29 GMT >From: "MaryL" carstan101@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER
> but I thought it might be worth >mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only >of the claws. I think it's definitely worth mentioning too. I think a lot of the vets who declaw don't tell people what's involved, and most likely just tell people it's like a simple manicure. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
HD - 06 Oct 2004 03:09 GMT >> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock >> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want >to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother. Oh well, some people never learn! You walked into it with both eyes open. re : The last sentence of your original post. And now you are indignant about the people who raked you over the coals.
Another leader in the making!
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 03:42 GMT > > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock > > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > > DEBATE! Then you shouldn't have maimed your cats. That's right, *maim* - amputation without benefit is *mayhem*.
> To all of you: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops > for three weeks. So where in your above self-praising tribute are your "reasons" for declawing innocent kittens? I sure as hell didn't see any. When you're done singing your own praises please point out your "reasons". From what I've read, these kittens didn't even have a scratching problem.
Many of us have done - and continue to do, on a daily basis, as much, and for some of us, much more than you have for cats yet we don't feel that gives us the right to *maim* the cats we help. Yes, you read that's right, *maim* - amputation without benefit is *mayhem*.
> So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We *damn* sure do have the right to condemn self-righteous, self-serving a.sholes who knowing and intentionally inflict unnecessary pain and privation upon innocent kittens for your own convenience.
We
> gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in > perhaps more than one case, exsistance period. ...which you're making them pay for with their blood, bones, ligaments, tendons and nerves as well as priviation.
Here's an excerpt from my site by Dr. Nicholas Dodman, Professor of Behavioral Pharmacology and Director of the Behavior Clinic at Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine and internationally known specialist in domestic animal behavioral research:
"The inhumanity of the procedure is clearly demonstrated by the nature of cats' recovery from anesthesia following the surgery. Unlike routine recoveries, including recovery from neutering surgeries, which are fairly peaceful, declawing surgery results in cats bouncing off the walls of the recovery cage because of excruciating pain. Cats that are more stoic huddle in the corner of the recovery cage, immobilized in a state of helplessness, presumably by overwhelming pain. Declawing fits the dictionary definition of mutilation to a tee. Words such as deform, disfigure, disjoint, and dismember all apply to this surgery. Partial digital amputation is so horrible that it has been employed for torture of prisoners of war, and in veterinary medicine, the clinical procedure serves as model of severe pain for testing the efficacy of analgesic drugs. Even though analgesic drugs can be used postoperatively, they rarely are, and their effects are incomplete and transient anyway, so sooner or later the pain will emerge." (Excerpted from The Cat Who Cried For Help, Dodman N, Bantam Books, New York).
http://maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
Alison - 06 Oct 2004 11:03 GMT "ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote in message being spayed at the same time, it will be an
> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all > did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites. > > If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously, > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.>>> My cat Kim was a rescue, she was in a bad way, very nervous and defensive aggressive, she attacked me badly several times, and is still liable to be aggressive but is much better and very loveable. we have all learnt how to handle her so she doesn't feel the need to be aggressive and my pets, my dog and rabbit have learnt not to get to close to her or invade her space. Decalw is not an option in the Uk but even if it was, I wouldn't have had it done to Kim ,(or any cat) she'd been through enough. Alison
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 11:27 GMT > Decalw is not an option in the Uk That begs the question: How do pro-declawers think people live with their cats in countries where declawing is either illegal or considered unethical and not performed?
Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes?
Phil
Diane L. Schirf - 06 Oct 2004 12:28 GMT > Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully > clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes? My previous cat, Pudge, was clawed. I gave her sisal rope scratching post and didn't happen to have any furniture to worry about. She was a sweet cat and didn't claw anyone. She took all her needs out on the post and on the throw rugs. I've talked to people who are fastidious about their homes and have nice furniture. They simply don't have pets for that very reason. Problem solved.
Hodge came to me front declawed. He's aggressive and dominant and bites unpredictably (but has moments of being sweet/affectionate). I'm not sure what the deal with him is -- whether whoever abandoned him had him declawed because he used his claws like his teeth (in which case, the above scenario is likely -- I have bite scars) or whether he was declawed, and that made him more aggressive (pre-emptive defensive mode). I've always wondered whether he was always like this or if he was mistreated -- sort of a chicken-and-the-egg thing. He has improved somewhat in two and one-half years. Somewhat.
 Signature http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/
-L. : - 09 Oct 2004 07:46 GMT > > Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully > > clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes? [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > mistreated -- sort of a chicken-and-the-egg thing. He has improved > somewhat in two and one-half years. Somewhat. Many cats become defensive biters AFTER they are declawed. Ignorant people who have an aggresssive cat often declaw because the cat scratches. Then the cat becomes a biter, and they can't figure out why. Some people, simply, have small brains.
-L.
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:47 GMT >From: svendlho@aol.com (ceb2)
>F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!! Oohh! Those are big scary words!
>None of you know me none of you know my >situation. There is NEVER a situation that warrants animal cruelty.
>You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued >from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin >and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than a softball. She was >our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding her. I rescued my cats to from a bad situation. But I didn't subject them to mutilation to pay for me rescuing them. I actually gave them respect and a loving home. Then I trimmed claws and trained them. Gee, guess I must be a genious, huh?
>We nursed >her back to health and she is perfectly fit now. She won't be once she's mutilated.
>So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We >gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in >perhaps more than one case, exsistance period. Listen you stupid twat, taking in cats gives you no right to mutilate and abuse them. You are a sick disgusting excuse for a human being. I can't wait for your karma to catch up with you. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Steve G - 06 Oct 2004 01:11 GMT (...)
> I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel > and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel > bad enough, but we have our reasons. (...)
> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect > their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct > personality and I would hate for that to change. > > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A > DEBATE! Well, you get to say what you are looking for, but I'm afraid you don't get to say what you'll find.
You say you 'have your reasons'. If you are a haemophiliac, or if you have some arcane immune disorder, then perhaps you do 'have your reasons'. Otherwise...
So, what are your reasons?
Regarding your questions about behaviour post-declaw: Anecdotally, declaw is associated with various problems such as loss of litter training, higher risk of the cat becoming a biter, biomechanical problems, etc. I don't know how much of this is actually supported in the scientific literature though. For example, a survey by Patronek et al. (1996; J Vet Med Am Assoc 209: 582-588) found that declaw was not associated with increased innapropriate elimination. Still, you might want to look at www.declawing.com, and the AVMA statement on delclawing (http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/apr03/030415c.asp). Or not, because these sites do not condone declawing.
I have no insight as the owner of a declawed cat though; it is an insight my conscience will never let me have.
Steve.
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 16:22 GMT > (...) > > I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > So, what are your reasons? Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here goes. We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in 1960 and not renovated since. We completely redid the entire interior. Every room. Walls, floors cielings. Bought all new furniture. Got the cats while we were doing this. They scratch everything. Rugs, drapes, furniture, and in some cases, even the walls. They have 2 scratching posts which they sometimes scratch but they prefer the furniture and other stuff. I then built them an enclosure in the garage with a kitty door so they can get there at their will. It has many levels and shelves and cubbies and tunnels. Completely upholstered and carpeted. Rope tightly wound around all the wood beams for their scratching pleasure.(I'll post pics on my sight if anyone cares to see)They use it but still prefer the rest of the house. This wasn't a problem until recently. My wife is a teacher and went back to work in the fall, and my girls ent back to school, and I returned to work after a lengthy layoff. When we were around, it wasn't a problem, a spray bottle worked wonders as a dterent. We also tried double backed tape, citrus sprays and other things to no avail. Now they have the place to themselves and we se evidence of serious scratching. And climbing. After we made the appointment, I was lyng in bed the other night and heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered walls and was clinging at the ceiling.
I have been against this and on many levels and still am, but my wife is adamant. Color me out of whack, but here are my priorities:
1. My wife and girls 2. My own well-bing 3. Our home 4. The cats 5. The dog
Like I said, I know none of these reasons will be good enough for some or all of you. That would probably be true even if I did have a blood condition, or any other disorder, or if we frequently had babies and toddlers around (which we do) and I only have to justify this to me and mine, not you lot.
So there it is.
> Regarding your questions about behaviour post-declaw: Anecdotally, > declaw is associated with various problems such as loss of litter [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Steve. Overall, I would like to thank you Steve, for an intelligent response to my information.
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 17:02 GMT Those reasons are not valid. You just solidify that you care more objects than you do your cats which are living, breathing creatures. Then instead of owning up to what you did, you blamed your wife (if you even have one). If you were so against declawing and still went ahead with it then you prove how cruel you really are. Normally I would not hope that someone else be their human but I think this is an exception. Those cats deserved your love and affection not coldness and cruelty. You are disgusting!
 Signature Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com "ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote in message > Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here
> goes. > We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > Overall, I would like to thank you Steve, for an intelligent response > to my information. KellyH - 06 Oct 2004 17:26 GMT > Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here > goes. > We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in > 1960 and not renovated since. Nope, not a valid reason.
> We completely redid the entire interior. > Every room. Walls, floors cielings. Bought all new furniture. Got the > cats while we were doing this. They scratch everything. Rugs, drapes, > furniture, and in some cases, even the walls. While you were doing this renovation, did you take the cats into consideration? Select fabrics that they would be less likely to want to scratch, more resistant to damage. When we bought a new couch, we spent a lot of time considering the fabric.
>They have 2 scratching > posts which they sometimes scratch but they prefer the furniture and > other stuff. Are the scratching posts big and sturdy?
>I then built them an enclosure in the garage with a kitty > door so they can get there at their will. It has many levels and > shelves and cubbies and tunnels. Completely upholstered and carpeted. > Rope tightly wound around all the wood beams for their scratching > pleasure.(I'll post pics on my sight if anyone cares to see)They use > it but still prefer the rest of the house. This sounds lovely, but the cats are social and prefer to be with the family. You can't expect them to only do their scratching in one room.
>This wasn't a problem until > recently. My wife is a teacher and went back to work in the fall, and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered > walls and was clinging at the ceiling. You have *upholstered* walls and you seriously expect the cats to leave them alone? Sorry, you can only expect the cats to conform but so much. Maybe you should have rethought your decorating scheme.
> I have been against this and on many levels and still am, but my wife > is adamant. Color me out of whack, but here are my priorities: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 4. The cats > 5. The dog Yes, they are out of whack. The cats should come before your home.
> Like I said, I know none of these reasons will be good enough for some > or all of you. That would probably be true even if I did have a blood [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > So there it is. Even if you couldn't stop the cats from scratching inappropriately, did you ever look into Soft Paws? This would have solved a lot of your problems and left the cats with their claws intact. And, don't play "my cats' sob story is more heartbreaking than yours". Not gonna work on this group. Just about everyone's cats on here has a sob story. Just because you rescued them doesn't give you the right to amputate their toes. If the cats were not able to live with their claws in your home, you could have come on this group and asked for help rehoming them. People here have moved cats across the country to get them to their forever homes. I would have helped. I volunteer at a rescue group and could have gotten them in.
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 19:10 GMT >From: svendlho@aol.com (ceb2)
>Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here >goes. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered >walls and was clinging at the ceiling. First of all, these are kittens, who most likely would have grown out of that rambunctious stage. Secondly, simple nail trimming would have helped. Training would have helped. It takes some effort on your part and your family's part. Mutilating these poor animals should never have been an option. I'm so sick of hearing from materialistic a.sholes. You know what's funny? I have a very nice home with nice furniture and my cats don't destroy anything. It's so simple, trimming claws and training. It's not rocket science, but I guess it is to some people. Lazy people who make excuses and only want quick fixes in life. ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
MacCandace - 06 Oct 2004 02:36 GMT << I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A DEBATE! >>
Bummer, you don't always get what you want, do you? Just like I'm sure your poor kitties want to have their digits amputated. You're worried their behavior will change; guess what, ya shouldn't have done it then. You might luck out and all 3 will stay the same or maybe 2 will or 1 will or none will. Time will tell. I hope you don't decide to "get rid" of them as most people who mutilate their cats do.
Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)
See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace
"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely)
.oO rach Oo. - 06 Oct 2004 03:40 GMT I have had one declawed cat. The reason for this was I was in college and during the summer, wanted to get her fixed. My mother had to take her in for the operation because I was working. When I picked her up, she had bandages on her paws. When I asked why, the vet replied my mother had asked that she be declawed too. I was furious. This is the only experience I have with a declawed cat and yes it did change her personality. For some time after, she seemed depressed and lethargic. It had nothing to do with the aesthetic but I think she was in pain and depressed at her change in what is a natural thing.
I won't flame you because you'll get enough of that and I don't have the energy to. I just think that whatever is said now will be a case of shutting the door after the horse has bolted off but think of this... when you take the responsibility of an animal, you take them for what they are and their n |
|