Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cats in surgery today

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ceb2 - 05 Oct 2004 17:01 GMT
We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
get spayed and declawed.
I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel
and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel
bad enough, but we have our reasons.
They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their
procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation
and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an
easier recovery.
I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect
their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct
personality and I would hate for that to change.

I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
DEBATE!
Mary - 05 Oct 2004 17:18 GMT
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

I declawed and spayed my cat at the same time, just as you are doing. Why?
Because I was an idiot. Young and ignorant. You are an idiot, and really
cruel for doing both the spay and the declaw at the same time when you knew
damned well what the declaw entails. You can look forward to biting,
mistrust, and inappropriate elimination. When you can get them to go in the
box they probably won't cover it up. I kept my mutilated girl for her entire
20-year life. Now that you have done the Nazi thing, that is the least you
can do. I hope you pick them up the same day so you can see how much they
are suffering, but I expect your vet will keep them so that you don't know.

I am very, very happy for your furniture and drapery. But Karma is a bitch,
babe Believe me, I know.
hamandcheese@betweentheknees.com - 05 Oct 2004 17:31 GMT
>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
>DEBATE!

Well don't come here looking for anything else if you chose to do this
barbaric procedure that is banned in most of the world.

-mhd
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:33 GMT
>>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
>>DEBATE!

Then why don't you just f.ck off.  People here are cat lovers and don't enjoy
hearing from people who like to mutilate them.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
CatNipped - 05 Oct 2004 17:38 GMT
Take a look at what they're doing to your sweet little kittens and then ask
not to be flamed here...

http://community-2.webtv.net/stopdeclaw/declawpics/

Hugs,

CatNipped

> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!
Elizabeth Blake - 05 Oct 2004 18:16 GMT
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
> get spayed and declawed.
> I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel
> and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel
> bad enough, but we have our reasons.

> They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their
> procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation
> and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an
> easier recovery.

Much more humane?!?!  I seriously doubt that.

> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect
> their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct
> personality and I would hate for that to change.

Well, they may end up becoming somewhat nasty and prone to biting, to make
up for you ripping their claws out.

> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

--
Liz
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:35 GMT
>> They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their
>> procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation
>> and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an
>> easier recovery.

That is total bullshit.  Declawing entails amputating the third phlanx of each
toe along with the claw.  I have heard of this Banfield Hospital.  I can't
remember where but if I recall correctly, they are listed at the Declaw Hall of
Shame website.  They are lying to you pure and simple.  
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
MacCandace - 09 Oct 2004 04:44 GMT
<<  I have heard of this Banfield Hospital.  I can't
remember where but if I recall correctly, they are listed at the Declaw Hall of
Shame website >>

Here in the Phoenix area, Banfield is the vet group that is in the local
Petsmarts.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Cat Protector - 09 Oct 2004 04:51 GMT
They aren't that cheap though.

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> Here in the Phoenix area, Banfield is the vet group that is in the local
> Petsmarts.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> other
> than human."  (Loren Eisely)
Sherry - 09 Oct 2004 05:30 GMT
>They aren't that cheap though.

Cheap really shouldn't be a criteria  for choosing a vet, though.

Sherry
cmtowle - 05 Oct 2004 18:55 GMT
> They are at Banfield Animal Hospital who have assured us that their
> procedure is much more humane because they don't do a full amputation
> and that since they are being spayed at the same time, it will be an
> easier recovery.

If they are *not* doing a full amputation of the distal phalanx (last toe
bone) of each toe, they are cutting *through* the bone. This method is
generally thought of as causing more complications than the full amputation
of the distal phalanx which itself can cause a host of medical
complications. You are not getting current or accurate information. If they
*are* removing the entire the last toe bone, they are using the prevalent
method and are lying to you. If they are saying that the procedure is "much
more humane", they are lying to you. Elective declawing, by definition, is
inhumane. It is unnecessary surgery which puts cats at risk during and post
surgery, it is done solely for owner convenience, changes a cat's gait and
balance, and deprives cats of so much that is unique to cats. If you elected
to have this procedure done knowing full well what is involved rather than
provide them with and spend some time teaching them to use "acceptable"
scratching posts/surfaces allowing them to express instinctive behaviour
which serves many functions, you do not have your kitties' best interests at
heart. How sad for these wonderful creatures.

> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect
> their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct
> personality and I would hate for that to change.

Then why elect to subject them to a procedure which has the potential of
doing just that?

> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

Since you expected that this would be the case, it implies that you did some
research - all the more distressing that you made this choice for these
innocent beings.

M.
Sherry - 05 Oct 2004 19:03 GMT
>We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
>(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
>DEBATE!

Right. So you posted just to let us know. Why post at all? Trollass.

Sherry
Mary - 05 Oct 2004 19:15 GMT
> >We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> >(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Sherry

heh. Dumbass is more like it. Like you only get what you are "looking for"
in Usenet. Dickhead.
Cat Protector - 05 Oct 2004 19:07 GMT
I can understand the spaying but why torture them by having them declawed?
If you feel so bad then why are you having them declawed?

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!
Mary - 05 Oct 2004 19:15 GMT
> I can understand the spaying but why torture them by having them declawed?
> If you feel so bad then why are you having them declawed?

Ceb2 DOES NOT FEEL BAD, CP.
Cat Protector - 05 Oct 2004 22:21 GMT
That seems obvious. Those that declaw after knowing the facts don't often
have a change of heart.

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> Ceb2 DOES NOT FEEL BAD, CP.
dgk - 05 Oct 2004 20:21 GMT
>We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
>(don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
>DEBATE!

You're an a.shole.
KellyH - 05 Oct 2004 21:04 GMT
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

People who declaw without knowing any better make me sad, but declawing even
AFTER you researched is just f.cking cruel!  Yes, I'm breaking my own
anti-cursing rule because this warrants it!!  How can you research declawing
and still but your sweet little kittens through that??
I had my cat Dash(RB) declawed, but I do plead ignorance on that.  I was 16
when I got her, and she was a swiper, and my parents didn't like having the
furniture scratched, so off to be declawed.  She was a biter, and never
covered her poop.  She was a tempermental cat anyway, so I can't really say
if the declawing had any effect on that.
That animal hospital either doesn't know what they are talking about, or is
flat-out lying to you.  Thanks for posting their name so we can all bombard
them with calls.
If you weren't looking for a debate or to be flamed, you came to the wrong
place!

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
www.kelltek.com
Check out www.snittens.com

zuzu22@webtv.net - 05 Oct 2004 22:02 GMT
>We have three 5 month old kittens;
>Princess Consuela Bananahammock
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>flingers. I already feel bad enough, but we
>have our reasons.

You *should* feel bad. Inflicting pain and totally unnecessary
amputations on 3 innocent kittens who depend on you to care for them
humanely and with kindness is unconscionable. Did it ever occur to you
that if you feel bad about this, maybe you shouldn't go through with it?
You knew about this newsgroup so why aren't you posting asking for help
with whatever clawing issues you had so we could help you and the
kittens wouldn't have to suffer unnecessarily?

>They are at Banfield Animal Hospital

Oh yeah, Banfield, which is AFAIC the "dollar store" of vet clinics and
has, IMO, some of the most unethical people I've come across.

>who have assured us that their
>procedure is much more humane because
>they don't do a full amputation and that
>since they are being spayed at the same
>time, it will be an easier recovery.

They lied to you. First of all, it goes against all common sense to
think that putting a kitten through major abdominal surgery *and* 10
separate and painful amputations at the same time is "easier" on them
than just doing a spay.

Second, if they don't do a complete amputation the kitten is at an even
greater risk for complications and resulting pain, etc.
I did a little googling and found out that you live in the Waterbury, CT
area. There is a Banfield Hospital located there so I called to inquire
about how they declaw cats. I got two different answers. The person that
answered the phone said they just take the nail out, then the vet (a
very *young* sounding vet) got on the phone and said that she does a
complete disarticulation of the first joint. In other words, a complete
amputation.

If this is the hospital you are using they have intentionally deceived
you. What I found even more shocking was that the vet, obviously
defensive, went on to say that, and this is a direct quote, "they are up
and walking around the next day as if nothing happened." This is such
complete and utter bullshit, and this vet intentionally made it sound as
though declawing is no big deal. She was selling it for all she  was
worth. I was absolutely disgusted.

I also noticed in my search that your wife was in a serious car accident
a few years ago and had some pretty bad injuries. Knowing the kind of
pain that your wife suffered partly as a result of bone trauma, it is
mystifying to me how you could intentionally inflict the same pain and
trauma multiple times on innocent kittens.

>I am looking for insight from owners of
>declawed cats. Should I expect their
>behavior to be the same? They all have
>their own distinct personality and I would
>hate for that to change.

Click on the link to my photo album and read about Mister Mistopheles
and what happened to him as a result of being declawed. He was *lucky*
that he got saved from the grim reaper. Most cats in his situation
aren't. While you're at it, read why a shelter in Jersey doesn't allow
cats they adopt out to be declawed anymore:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&selm=22243-3E7A7ABC-
87%40storefull-2138.public.lawson.webtv.net


>I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI
>DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I
>LOOKING FOR A DEBATE!

This is a public forum and people are free to say anything they choose.
You've been on Usenet long enough to know that what you want and what
you get are often two entirely different things. Your defensiveness is a
clear indicator that you know what you are doing is wrong. I'm hoping
that in reality you haven't really gone through with it yet and there's
still time to save these kittens from what is an extremely barbaric and
cruel act. If that's the case, I and others here would be more than
willing to help you find ways to deal humanely with whatever scratching
issues you have.

Megan

                                   
Signature


"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing."

-Edmund Burke

Learn The TRUTH About Declawing
http://www.stopdeclaw.com

Zuzu's Cats Photo Album:
http://www.PictureTrail.com/zuzu22

"Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), there is one
elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and
splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then
providence moves too. A whole stream of events issues from the decision,
raising in one's favor all manner of unforeseen incidents, meetings and
material assistance, which no man could have dreamt would have come his
way."

- W.H. Murray

ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 00:11 GMT
> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

To all of you:

F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!! None of you know me none of you know my
situation. You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued
from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin
and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than a softball. She was
our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding her. We nursed
her back to health and she is perfectly fit now. Roxie was second. She
came from the Connecticut humane society. No one wanted her. She was
mean, aggressive, and hissed at any person or cat who came near her.
We took a chance and she gets along great with Princess and the new
one. Grizabella came from the Waterbury CT dog pound. She ended up
there because the pet store couldn't sell her. She was the runt of the
litter, already scheduled for euthansia. She came home with a yeast
infection in her ears, worms, and kennel cough. That's right kennel
cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops
for three weeks.

So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We
gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in
perhaps more than one case, exsistance period.

We had a chance to see them this afternoon a matter of hours after the
surgery and all are doing fine. Tired but fine. They are all eating
and Roxie is trying to play with the other two.

I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all
did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites.

If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously,
these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 00:24 GMT
I have to agree with the group here. Knowingly declawing after have gathered
all the facts is disgusting. I have to wonder where your conscious was? It
wasn't as if these cats were declawed before you rescued them. Your having
these cats declawed was a very abusive act. It is sad that you would first
post your intentions of declawing but even sadder acting as if you are proud
of it. These cats depended on you to keep them safe and you violated their
trust. You should ashamed of yourself!

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> To all of you:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
> to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 13:47 GMT
> I have to agree with the group here. Knowingly declawing after have gathered
> all the facts is disgusting. I have to wonder where your conscious was? It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> of it. These cats depended on you to keep them safe and you violated their
> trust. You should ashamed of yourself!

Whao! I NEVER said I was proud of it. In fact, I am anything but.

> > To all of you:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
> > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 16:51 GMT
Then why did you announce that you are declawing the cats on here despite
knowing all the facts that it was a cruel and painful practice? A person
like you does not deserve an animal as wonderful as a cat. You deserved the
criticism and anger from this group. It was absolutely horrible what you did
to those cats. Then you have the nerve to swear and curse at those of us who
love cats and care for them. Don't you realize that by having those cats
declawed that you not only tortured them but also took away their main line
of defense against predators should they ever get outside? You did a mean
and cruel act and now you will have to live with the guilt but so far you
seem to have no conscious. Shame on you!

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> Whao! I NEVER said I was proud of it. In fact, I am anything but.
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> > these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
>> > to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.
Mary - 06 Oct 2004 01:06 GMT
"ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote > To all of you:

> None of you know me none of you know my situation. You want to know how we
got our cats? Princess was rescued from some bastard who never fixed or fed
his cats. Her mom was skin and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than
a softball. She was our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding
her. We nursed
> her back to health and she is perfectly fit now. Roxie was second. She
came from the Connecticut humane society. No one wanted her. She was mean,
aggressive, and hissed at any person or cat who came near her.
> We took a chance and she gets along great with Princess and the new one.
Grizabella came from the Waterbury CT dog pound. She ended up  there because
the pet store couldn't sell her. She was the runt of the
> litter, already scheduled for euthansia. She came home with a yeast
infection in her ears, worms, and kennel cough. That's right kennel cough.
We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops  for three
weeks.

And so you feel entitled to MUTILATE these poor babies who have been through
so much? What an a.shole.

> We had a chance to see them this afternoon a matter of hours after the
surgery and all are doing fine. Tired but fine. They are all eating
> and Roxie is trying to play with the other two.

Bullshit. Did you see them try to touch their toes to the floor and jerk and
flinch? Lying a.shole

> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all
> did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites.
>
> If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously,
> these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
> to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.

Yeah, they are so wonderful you mutilated them.
cmtowle - 06 Oct 2004 01:39 GMT
> snipped......None of you know me none of you know my
> situation.

What truly matters in this group are your cats and their welfare.  No matter
what your situation, choosing to declaw cats having all of the information
and help for alternatives available is indefensible.  You simply cannot
justify, ethically or medically, your choice to amputate the ends of your
cats' toes.

>You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued
> from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops
> for three weeks.

This is what is so mystifying. You had the heart to save these suffering
cats and yet you knowingly subject them to more pain and suffering for your
convenience. Have these poor animals not been through enough?

> So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We
> gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in
> perhaps more than one case, exsistance period.

Making the decision to provide a home for abused, ill, and abandoned cats
only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or
compassion, no matter how you put it.

...snipped....

> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all
> did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites.

Why are we hypocrites? The welfare of cats is a top priority amongst the
majority here. Therefore, the inflicting of unnecessary pain and risk is
unacceptable.

> If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously,
> these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
> to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.

Indeed because they are so wonderful, some of us are distressed that you
would choose to amputate the ends of their toes rather than provide them
with a feline-friendly environment where they can happily express
instinctive scratching behaviour.

That you were aware of what declawing entails, that you could access this
and other groups for help before making your choice, and that you chose to
declaw anyway makes it even more reprehensible.

M.
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 13:53 GMT
> > snipped......None of you know me none of you know my
> > situation.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or
> compassion, no matter how you put it.

So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

> ...snipped....
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> M.
Sherry - 06 Oct 2004 15:23 GMT
>> Making the decision to provide a home for abused, ill, and abandoned cats
>> only if they are declawed is unconscionable and it is not a sign of love or
>> compassion, no matter how you put it.
>
>So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
>or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

Arrggh. Deja moo. Big time deja moo. The feeling we've all heard this bulls*t
before.
The cold, hard fact is, if you can't live with a clawed cat, you shouldn't have
gotten a cat to begin with. There are no circumstances that make it "OK" to
mutilate them. None.

Sherry
Mary - 06 Oct 2004 15:50 GMT
> So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
> or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

Those were not the only choices. YOU made them the only choices by being too
lazy and selfish to simply train them to scratch appropriate surfaces. Shame
on you.
---MIKE--- - 06 Oct 2004 15:01 GMT
Can't all you people see that the OP must be a troll.  Why would anyone
want to post a notice of intent to declaw on a newsgroup that they KNOW
is anti-declaw?  Only to stir things up.

                 ---MIKE---
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 15:53 GMT
> So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
> or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

The old emotional blackmail routine, again, "declaw or death".

What would you have done if declawing wasn't legally an option?  Would you
have left the kittens "undernourished, starving to death, euthanised, or
stuck in a cage"?

http://maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
cmtowle - 06 Oct 2004 16:20 GMT
...snipped...

> > > So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We
> > > gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
> or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

Again - making declawing a condition of rescuing ill, starving, and
abandoned cats is unconscionable, indefensible and cruel. Good deeds do not
erase inhumane acts. Good deeds do not make cruelty permissible.

Your question pre-supposes that you had only two options. Rescue them and
declaw them, or abandon them to their horrible fates. It is a convenient way
of seeing things, but it is an incorrect and cowardly way of living. The
cats you rescued would be better off in a loving, feline-friendly home where
they are treated with the compassion they deserve. They would be better off
in a home where they are treated with patience, caring, and love. This means
taking the little time it takes to provide them with "acceptable"
alternatives to scratch. It means allowing them to express instinctive
scratching behaviour to their hearts' content. It means accepting their
uniqueness which provides them with so much pleasure apart from serving
several functions. It means loving them for the wonderful creatures they are
complete with the claws they come with.

It means never doing intentional harm.

M.

...snipped...
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 16:55 GMT
What does saving them have to do with declawing? You could have saved them
and not declawed. You decided to declaw not only out of laziness but also
out of cruelty. You could have trimmed their claws and also taught the the
cats to use a scratching post.

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com

> So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
> or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:51 GMT
>From: svendlho@aol.com  (ceb2)

>So they were better of undernourished, starving to death, euthanised,
>or stuck in a cage as long as they have their claws?

I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their
ends of their toes chopped off.  Now they will suffer for the rest of their
lives because of your selfish cruel act.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
teri - 09 Oct 2004 02:05 GMT
>I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their
>ends of their toes chopped off.
That statement is way over the top.  But of course you already know
that ;-)
teri
Mary - 09 Oct 2004 03:54 GMT
> >I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their
> >ends of their toes chopped off.

> That statement is way over the top.  But of course you already know
> that ;-)
> teri

When one has the choice to save a cat and keep it whole and chooses to
mutilate--that is behavior that is "over the top." You, too clearly believe
that as humans it is our right
not to be inconvenienced even if it means mutilating domesticated animals
who trust and depend on us. Now that is what I call really over the top. It
might be fine in alt.I'm.human.and.can.do.any.evil.f.cking.thing.want.to
ha.ha.ha, but in a cat group you and your good AOL buddy
"LuvsToTortureCatsIQOOO" might just get a few negative responses.
-L. : - 09 Oct 2004 07:47 GMT
> >I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having their
> >ends of their toes chopped off.
> That statement is way over the top.  But of course you already know
> that ;-)
> teri

Not really.  The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable.  I
have met many who would have been much better off having been
euthanized.

-L.
Steve G - 11 Oct 2004 22:51 GMT
(...)

> Not really.  The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable.  I
> have met many who would have been much better off having been
> euthanized.

Many, perhaps - but that's not all. Automatically saying a cat would
be better dead than missing its toes is a bit deranged, really, even
if declawing is a terrible thing. I hope you don't think that human
amputees are better off dead!

Steve.
MaryL - 11 Oct 2004 23:50 GMT
> (...)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Steve.

In my opinion, it really is an extreme (and incorrect stance) to
automatically assume that a cat is better off dead than declawed.  In my
opinion, the problem is that it should not be an "either/or" option -- there
is no reason to assume that a cat needs to be either declawed or euthanized.
Instead, why not learn to love a cat for what it is (including claws) and
work on showing a cat how to use scratching posts.  After all, would anyone
dare to suggest cutting off the tips of a child's fingers if the child
smeared food on the walls?  Of course not!!!  Likewise, there is no need to
declaw a cat simply because a person wants nice furniture.  Cats can be
trained!  Claws can also be trimmed, and some people use alternatives such
as "soft paws" (an alternative that I have never needed because I have found
it remarkably easy to train each of my cats to use scratching posts -- one
simply needs to provide a variety of surfaces and make the posts readily
available to cats by positioning them in various rooms).

MaryL
-L. : - 12 Oct 2004 05:59 GMT
> > (...)
> >>
> >> Not really.  The life of a cat with declaw issues can be miserable.  I
> >> have met many who would have been much better off having been

> >> euthanized.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> MaryL

The truth is, however, that *many* people use the "declaw this cat or
I will put it down" blackmail threat when they approach their vets for
declawing.  IME, if the vet is resistant at all, this is usually what
is thrown out as a retort.  Sad, but true.

My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off
surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a
loving, permanent home - because if someone is willing to euthanize a
cat for clawing it is unlikely they will be tolerant of other cat
behaviors.

-L.
Sherry - 12 Oct 2004 06:06 GMT
>My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off
>surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>-L.

That's the way I've always thought. If someone can't tolerate claws, they're
not going to put up with peeing / pooping outside the box, cat hair all over
the place,  and all the other things we all here probably just take in stride.
Declaw or Die is so bogus. That's how the vet I use justifies the fact that he
declaws, that he's "saving" them from being dumped in a shelter. He submitted
an article on that very topic to our newsletter, and being the fascist editor
that I am, I wouldn't print it. In retrospect, I should have printed it, then
written a rebuttal. I missed a golden opportunity.
Sherry
Phil P. - 12 Oct 2004 07:30 GMT
> >My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off
> >surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> written a rebuttal. I missed a golden opportunity.
> Sherry

Gary Landsberg - a self-proclaimed Canadian "behaviorist", uses the declaw
or death/surrender routine all the time and is probably single-handedly
responsible for that attitude in the general population.  Here's one of his
more notable statements:

"Perhaps the most startling statistic is that an estimated 50% of all
declawed cats would not have been kept by their owners had they not been
declawed. This means that in the province of Ontario (Canada) alone, where
approximately 100,000 cats are declawed each year, as many as 50,000 cats
would not have had homes if they had not been declawed." (100K declaws/yr. -
that's a lot of money)

Yngver found another statement by Landsberg that said 98% of the people who
had their cats declawed would have kept their cats if they could not be
declawed...

Declawing is similar to the annual vaccination fallacy that needs to exposed
publicly on a national level.

Phil
Steve G - 12 Oct 2004 18:28 GMT
(...)

> The truth is, however, that *many* people use the "declaw this cat or
> I will put it down" blackmail threat when they approach their vets for
> declawing.  IME, if the vet is resistant at all, this is usually what
> is thrown out as a retort.  Sad, but true.

TBH, in these cases I think the vet should be able to say 'Go on then
- they're your morals, and it'll be your guilt', or somesuch.

> My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off
> surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a
> loving, permanent home -

Quite possibly. However, this is a different stance than saying that
declawed cats would be better off dead!

> because if someone is willing to euthanize a
> cat for clawing it is unlikely they will be tolerant of other cat
> behaviors.

Yes.

Steve.
-L. : - 13 Oct 2004 05:00 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> TBH, in these cases I think the vet should be able to say 'Go on then
> - they're your morals, and it'll be your guilt', or somesuch.

IME, vets aren't reluctant to declaw when the "euth or declaw" line is
used.  They declaw.  The vet I worked for, I estimate made about
90-100K income on declaws every year.

> > My stance is that a cat that resides in such a home is better off
> > surrended to a shelter where it gets a chance to be placed in a
> > loving, permanent home -
>
> Quite possibly. However, this is a different stance than saying that
> declawed cats would be better off dead!

Yet, as I said before, many cats are MUCH better off dead than living
in their miserable declawed state.

-L.
-L. : - 12 Oct 2004 06:01 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Steve.

My brother is a human an and for many, many years he would have
answered that statement with "Yes, I would have been better off dead".
Having seen what he went through, there is no way I could *ever*
advocate declawing (not that I would, anyway, besed on my experience
as a vet tech).

-L.
Steve G - 12 Oct 2004 17:50 GMT
(...)

> My brother is a human an and for many, many years he would have
> answered that statement with "Yes, I would have been better off dead".

For many years ... but not for his whole life?

Regardless, there are always exceptions, and there are also
exceptional people who do more with missing bits than most people with
the full complement of limbs. Christopher Reeve is an apposite example
at this time (OK, he wasn't actually an amputee). Norman Croucher is
an excellent example, too (http://www.normancroucher.co.uk/index.htm).

>  Having seen what he went through, there is no way I could *ever*
> advocate declawing (not that I would, anyway, besed on my experience
> as a vet tech).

Yes, but there's a big difference between disagreeing with declawing
and suggesting that all declawed cats would be better off dead.

S.
kaeli - 12 Oct 2004 19:37 GMT
> Yes, but there's a big difference between disagreeing with declawing
> and suggesting that all declawed cats would be better off dead.

Which is better - a life in constant pain, or death?

How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us
about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to live
with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice?

How many cats who are declawed experience constant pain? We don't know. Maybe
all. Maybe none. Maybe 50%.

What if it's not severe pain, but more of a "phantom" pain, like amputees say
they get?
What if it comes and goes?

There are so many things we don't know about declawing because the cats can't
tell us.
I wouldn't say that all cats who are declawed are better off dead, but I
would say that I myself would rather be dead than live a life of constant
pain.

Just rambling. Sorry.  :)

Signature

--
~kaeli~
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success?
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

Phil P. - 12 Oct 2004 20:05 GMT
> How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us
> about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to live
> with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice?
>
> How many cats who are declawed experience constant pain? We don't know. Maybe
> all. Maybe none. Maybe 50%.

Here's an excerpt from the chapter on onychectomy in Small Animal Surgery
(2nd ed) by Theresa Welch Fossum - one of the most widely used surgical
texts. Doesn't say "constant" pain - but temporary is bad enough since
there's no medical benefit for the cat:

"Complications (i.e., pain, hemorrhage, pad damage, lameness, swelling,
infection, claw regrowth, second phalanx protrusion, and palmargrade stance)
occur in 50% of patients. "

There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention
it deserves.  Cats enjoy scratching.

Phil
Sherry - 12 Oct 2004 21:32 GMT
>There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention
>it deserves.  Cats enjoy scratching.
>
>Phil

Yeah, that's a point that sometimes gets lost in the fray. Cats enjoy their
claws. They scratch because it exercises their limbs and paws, and it just
plain feels good. It's shameful to take that away from them.

Sherry
Phil P. - 13 Oct 2004 03:55 GMT
> >There's also the matter of privation that never seems to get the attention
> >it deserves.  Cats enjoy scratching.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Sherry

I really get pissed of every time I hear a declawer say "my cat still
scratches".  Yeah, they go through the motion from instinct but they don't
get the enjoyment or benefit from digging their claws in and pulling back.
Its like doing a chin up without the bar or rowing without the oars.

The declawing surveys only address the clients' attitude towards the cats'
behavior.  As long as the cat doesn't develop behavior or medical problems
that affect the owner, they're satisfied.  What about the cat?

I think its a horrible thing to do to a trusting, sensitive individual.

Phil
Steve G - 13 Oct 2004 18:59 GMT
(...)

> Which is better - a life in constant pain, or death?

An unanswerable question. How much pain? Again, people do choose
chronic pain (e.g., fibromyalgia) over death. Not much of a choice,
mind.

> How might we know if a cat is in constant pain? They don't exactly tell us
> about it. Stalwart creatures that they are, might they not just learn to
> live with it, seeing as how they don't have much of a choice?

Difficult to know and, as you say, by definition they have to learn to
live with it (if the pain is present) - don't think cats can commit
suicide.

(...)

> What if it's not severe pain, but more of a "phantom" pain, like amputees
> say they get? What if it comes and goes?

This is an interesting point, and one I mentioned in a declawing
thread recently. Phantom pain is fairly common in amputees and can be
resistant to conventional painkillers.

(...)
> I wouldn't say that all cats who are declawed are better off dead, but I
> would say that I myself would rather be dead than live a life of constant
> pain.

Thing is, I don't think you can even know this for yourself without
actually being in the situation.

Lots of uncertainties, but I still think it's off the wall to suggest
that, in general, most declawed cats would be better dead.

Steve.
PawsForThought - 09 Oct 2004 20:04 GMT
>From: teri teric@enter.net

>>I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having
>their
>>ends of their toes chopped off.
>That statement is way over the top.  But of course you already know
>that ;-)
>teri  

Not to me a.shole ;)
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
teri - 10 Oct 2004 04:07 GMT
>>>I would rather have seen them humanely euthanized than tortured by having
>>their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Not to me a.shole ;)
name calling, very mature.  what are you in third grade.  

fwiw I would never declaw a cat, but there is one who has been
declawed laying next to me now purring herself to sleep.  of course
you think all declawed cats are better off dead.
teri
Wendy - 06 Oct 2004 03:07 GMT
> > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!!

I'd prefer not to and the cat/s might take care of the biting.

For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have had
yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to be
at risk from the surgery, the pain, anesthesia (they had to be under longer
than if they were just in for a neutering) and potential after effects of
this procedure. For the cats sakes I hope their surgery goes well and they
heal without complication but you took a irreversible risk with these babies
without even giving them a chance to see if you could train them to use
their claws where appropriate.

I've fostered 18 kittens this summer. Their ages when they came in my home
ranged from 2 weeks to 3 mos old. 11 of them were older kittens who were
scared to death and didn't hesitate to scratch and bite at first. One of
them would leap across the cage hissing and trying to bite and scratch just
because someone looked at her.I also had to deal with health problems. They
all had ear mites and diarrhea. One litter was very underweight because
there mother was run over by a car before they were old enough to take care
of themselves adequately. Their inauspicious start didn't stop them from
learning how to live in a household without doing damage with their claws.
Every one of them learned to use the cat tree and scratching posts. None of
them use claws on people. They all let me clip their claws. They all will be
able to live in a home without doing damage with their claws providing their
people provide them with an appropriate scratching post/cat tree. It's very
easy to train young kittens to use a scratching post/cat tree. It's almost
as easy as litter training them and a lot easier than weaning them.  I can
only assume you didn't want to be bothered trying to teach them.

As I said I hope they are all right. I hope they don't end up biting or
urinating on your rugs or furniture. But you chose to take that risk and
there is no going back so it's really no wonder people have little patience
with your choice.

W
Mary - 06 Oct 2004 03:55 GMT
> For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have
had yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to
be at risk from the surgery, the pain, anesthesia (they had to be under
longer than if they were just in for a neutering) and potential after
effects of this procedure. For the cats sakes I hope their surgery goes well
and they heal without complication but you took a irreversible risk with
these babies without even giving them a chance to see if you could train
them to usetheir claws where appropriate.

> I've fostered 18 kittens this summer. Their ages when they came in my home
ranged from 2 weeks to 3 mos old. 11 of them were older kittens who were
scared to death and didn't hesitate to scratch and bite at first. One of
> them would leap across the cage hissing and trying to bite and scratch
just because someone looked at her.I also had to deal with health problems.
They all had ear mites and diarrhea. One litter was very underweight because
there mother was run over by a car before they were old enough to take care
of themselves adequately. Their inauspicious start didn't stop them from
learning how to live in a household without doing damage with their claws.
Every one of them learned to use the cat tree and scratching posts. None of
them use claws on people. They all let me clip their claws. They all will be
able to live in a home without doing damage with their claws providing their
people provide them with an appropriate scratching post/cat tree. It's very
easy to train young kittens to use a scratching post/cat tree. It's almost
as easy as litter training them and a lot easier than weaning them.  I can
only assume you didn't want to be bothered trying to teach them.

> As I said I hope they are all right. I hope they don't end up biting or
urinating on your rugs or furniture. But you chose to take that risk and
there is no going back so it's really no wonder people have little patience
> with your choice.

Well, Wendy, your post just made me cry. You put it best of all, and it
means more coming from you because you took in all these little cats in one
summer and did such a beautiful job with them. Whereas this "ceb2" person
did a few nice things for three kittens then clearly thought "hell, I've put
enough out for them, it's time for ME and my conveniencd," like he/she has
somehow paid for the right to mutilate the cats. Which makes me cry even
more. And I'm not even pmsing. Nice post. Poor babies. I hope all the
selfish SOBs in the world get up in the middle of the night and stub their
miserable toes tonight. Bastards.
Wendy - 06 Oct 2004 12:55 GMT
> > For what you just spent on de-clawing these poor kittens you could have
> had yourself the Taj Mahal of cat trees and your poor guys wouldn't have to
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> selfish SOBs in the world get up in the middle of the night and stub their
> miserable toes tonight. Bastards.

I think what gets me more than anything is when people have the cats
de-clawed when there isn't even a problem. I have overheard too many people
announce proudly that they had their cats neutered and de-clawed like this
is a sign of a good owner. The cats hadn't been picking at anything they
just de-clawed on GP. Then there are the people that haul the poor kitty off
to the vet after the first time they pick at anything. They don't even try
to provide an appropriate place for the cat to scratch just haul them off to
lose the end of their toes You can't undo a de-claw. If it goes badly it's
forever. That's a heck of a risk to take before exhausting all other
alternatives.

I can't say I have extensive experience with de-clawed cats. All of mine
have had claws. My niece OTOH has had two that were de-clawed when she
adopted them. The first wasn't the friendliest cat but didn't have any paw
health issues and used the box reliably. I'm not willing to blame the
stand-offish personality on the de-claw because I don't know what this cat
was like before the procedure. The second cat was the sweetest boy who
urinated all over her house because he had one toe that wouldn't heal. It
kept on splitting open and bleeding. The message I got from this is that the
de-claw surgery is a bit of a crap shoot. If all goes well I suppose the
owner could go neener neener see it's not a problem. But if it doesn't and
the cat develops other undesirable behaviors then what? You can't paste the
ends of their toes back on. There is no undo.

People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their
panty hose.

W
MaryL - 10 Oct 2004 16:29 GMT
> People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their
> panty hose.
>
> W

As an addendum:  Many people do seem to think that declawing is as simple as
removing a person's toenail.  In fact, I thought that myself many years
ago -- fortunately, I learned better and never put any of my cats through
this cruel procedure.  Ironically, I did have to have the sides of my own
big toenails surgically removed when I was in 7th grade.  However, that
procedure involved removing only the *roots* at the side of the nails (and
most of the root and nail remain intact, to the extent that anyone looking
at my feet would not notice anything).  And, of course, the actual toe was
not damaged.  This is not *at all* what declawing involves in a cat, which
involves partial amputation.  I realize that most people who read this will
already be aware of the difference, but I thought it might be worth
mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only
of the claws.

MaryL
Mary - 10 Oct 2004 17:20 GMT
> > People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in their
> > panty hose.
> >
> > W
>
> As an addendum:  Many people do seem to think that declawing is as simple
as removing a person's toenail.  In fact, I thought that myself many years
ago -- fortunately, I learned better and never put any of my cats through
this cruel procedure.  Ironically, I did have to have the sides of my own
big toenails surgically removed when I was in 7th grade.  However, that
procedure involved removing only the *roots* at the side of the nails (and
most of the root and nail remain intact, to the extent that anyone looking
at my feet would not notice anything).  And, of course, the actual toe was
not damaged.  This is not *at all* what declawing involves in a cat, which
involves partial amputation.  I realize that most people who read this will
> already be aware of the difference, but I thought it might be worth
mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only
of the claws.

> MaryL

Thanks MaryL, it is worth mentioning as there are people out here who think
that. That is exactly what I thought it was when I had it done to Gnarly. I
thought her little feet would be the same only no sharp pointy claws.
Stupid? You bet. But that's what "declaw" sounds like. Maybe they ought to
call it "toe amputation."
MaryL - 10 Oct 2004 17:47 GMT
>> > People don't have their toenails removed because they poke holes in
> their
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Stupid? You bet. But that's what "declaw" sounds like. Maybe they ought to
> call it "toe amputation."

That's exactly what they should call it!  Maybe we should start a trend.

MaryL
PawsForThought - 10 Oct 2004 21:29 GMT
>From: "MaryL" carstan101@yahoo.comTAKE-OUT-THE-LITTER

> but I thought it might be worth
>mentioning for those who still think declawing somehow involves removal only
>of the claws.

I think it's definitely worth mentioning too.  I think a lot of the vets who
declaw don't tell people what's involved, and most likely just tell people it's
like a simple manicure.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
HD - 06 Oct 2004 03:09 GMT
>> We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
>> (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
>to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.

Oh well, some people never learn!
You walked into it with both eyes open.
re : The last sentence of your original post.
And now you are indignant about the people who raked you over the
coals.

Another leader in the making!
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 03:42 GMT
> > We have three 5 month old kittens; Princess Consuela Bananahammock
> > (don't ask), Roxie, and Grizabella. Today, they are all in surgery to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> > DEBATE!

Then you shouldn't have maimed your cats.  That's right, *maim* - amputation
without benefit is *mayhem*.

> To all of you:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> cough. We ended up medicating all of them, and she needed ear drops
> for three weeks.

So where in your above self-praising tribute are your "reasons" for
declawing innocent kittens?  I sure as hell didn't see any.   When you're
done singing your own praises please point out your "reasons".  From what
I've read, these kittens didn't even have a scratching problem.

Many of us have done - and continue to do, on a daily basis, as much, and
for some of us, much more than you have for cats yet we don't feel that
gives us the right to *maim* the cats we help.  Yes, you read that's right,
*maim* - amputation without benefit is *mayhem*.

> So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me.

We *damn* sure do have the right to condemn self-righteous, self-serving
a.sholes who knowing and intentionally inflict unnecessary pain and
privation upon innocent kittens for your own convenience.

We
> gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in
> perhaps more than one case, exsistance period.

...which you're making them pay for with their blood, bones, ligaments,
tendons and nerves as well as priviation.

Here's an excerpt from my site by  Dr. Nicholas Dodman, Professor of
Behavioral Pharmacology and Director of the Behavior Clinic at Tufts
University School of Veterinary Medicine and internationally known
specialist in domestic animal behavioral research:

"The inhumanity of the procedure is clearly demonstrated by the nature of
cats' recovery from anesthesia following the surgery. Unlike routine
recoveries, including recovery from neutering surgeries, which are fairly
peaceful, declawing surgery results in cats bouncing off the walls of the
recovery cage because of excruciating pain. Cats that are more stoic huddle
in the corner of the recovery cage, immobilized in a state of helplessness,
presumably by overwhelming pain. Declawing fits the dictionary definition of
mutilation to a tee. Words such as deform, disfigure, disjoint, and
dismember all apply to this surgery. Partial digital amputation is so
horrible that it has been employed for torture of prisoners of war, and in
veterinary medicine, the clinical procedure serves as model of severe pain
for testing the efficacy of analgesic drugs. Even though analgesic drugs can
be used postoperatively, they rarely are, and their effects are incomplete
and transient anyway, so sooner or later the pain will emerge."  (Excerpted
from The Cat Who Cried For Help, Dodman N, Bantam Books, New York).

http://maxshouse.com/facts_about_declawing.htm
Alison - 06 Oct 2004 11:03 GMT
"ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote in message being spayed at the same
time, it will be an

> I am not a lurker or a troll. I came here for the same reasons you all
> did. To talk about my cats. Buncha freakin hypocrites.
>
> If any of you want to talk about cats please let me know, seriously,
> these cats are wonderful, and I love to talk about them. If you want
> to jam your opinion down my throat, don't bother.>>>

My cat Kim was a rescue, she was in  a bad way, very nervous and
defensive aggressive, she attacked me badly several times,  and is
still liable to be aggressive but is much better and very loveable. we
have all learnt how to handle her so she doesn't feel the need to be
aggressive and my pets, my dog and rabbit have learnt not to get to
close to her or invade her space.
Decalw is not an option in the Uk but even if it was, I wouldn't have
had it done to Kim ,(or any cat) she'd been through enough.
Alison
Phil P. - 06 Oct 2004 11:27 GMT
>  Decalw is not an option in the Uk

That begs the question:  How do pro-declawers think people live with their
cats in countries where declawing is either illegal or considered unethical
and not performed?

Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully
clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes?

Phil
Diane L. Schirf - 06 Oct 2004 12:28 GMT
> Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully
> clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes?

My previous cat, Pudge, was clawed. I gave her sisal rope scratching
post and didn't happen to have any furniture to worry about. She was a
sweet cat and didn't claw anyone. She took all her needs out on the post
and on the throw rugs. I've talked to people who are fastidious about
their homes and have nice furniture. They simply don't have pets for
that very reason. Problem solved.

Hodge came to me front declawed. He's aggressive and dominant and bites
unpredictably (but has moments of being sweet/affectionate). I'm not
sure what the deal with him is -- whether whoever abandoned him had him
declawed because he used his claws like his teeth (in which case, the
above scenario is likely -- I have bite scars) or whether he was
declawed, and that made him more aggressive (pre-emptive defensive
mode). I've always wondered whether he was always like this or if he was
mistreated -- sort of a chicken-and-the-egg thing. He has improved
somewhat in two and one-half years. Somewhat.

Signature

http://www.mindspring.com/~slywy/

-L. : - 09 Oct 2004 07:46 GMT
> > Do they actually think millions of people around the world who have fully
> > clawed cats are covered with festering wounds and live in shredded homes?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> mistreated -- sort of a chicken-and-the-egg thing. He has improved
> somewhat in two and one-half years. Somewhat.

Many cats become defensive biters AFTER they are declawed.  Ignorant
people who have an aggresssive cat often declaw because the cat
scratches.  Then the cat becomes a biter, and they can't figure out
why.  Some people, simply, have small brains.

-L.
PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 18:47 GMT
>From: svendlho@aol.com  (ceb2)

>F*CK YOU AND BITE ME!!

Oohh!  Those are big scary words!

>None of you know me none of you know my
>situation.

There is NEVER  a situation that warrants animal cruelty.

>You want to know how we got our cats? Princess was rescued
>from some bastard who never fixed or fed his cats. Her mom was skin
>and bones, and so was she. Literally smaller than a softball. She was
>our first. She cried all the time if I wasn't holding her.

I rescued my cats to from a bad situation.  But I didn't subject them to
mutilation to pay for me rescuing them.  I actually gave them respect and a
loving home.  Then I trimmed claws and trained them.  Gee, guess I must be a
genious, huh?

>We nursed
>her back to health and she is perfectly fit now.

She won't be once she's mutilated.  

>So all of you just back off. No one here has the right to judge me. We
>gave these cats not only a shot, but a happy exsistance, and in
>perhaps more than one case, exsistance period.

Listen you stupid twat, taking in cats gives you no right to mutilate and abuse
them.  You are a sick disgusting excuse for a human being.  I can't wait for
your karma to catch up with you.
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
Steve G - 06 Oct 2004 01:11 GMT
(...)
> I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel
> and inhumane. Please, no flames and no guilt flingers. I already feel
> bad enough, but we have our reasons.
(...)
> I am looking for insight from owners of declawed cats. Should I expect
> their behavior to be the same? They all have their own distinct
> personality and I would hate for that to change.
>
> I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
> DEBATE!

Well, you get to say what you are looking for, but I'm afraid you
don't get to say what you'll find.

You say you 'have your reasons'. If you are a haemophiliac, or if you
have some arcane immune disorder, then perhaps you do 'have your
reasons'. Otherwise...

So, what are your reasons?

Regarding your questions about behaviour post-declaw: Anecdotally,
declaw is associated with various problems such as loss of litter
training, higher risk of the cat becoming a biter, biomechanical
problems, etc. I don't know how much of this is actually supported in
the scientific literature though. For example, a survey by Patronek et
al. (1996; J Vet Med Am Assoc 209: 582-588) found that declaw was not
associated with increased innapropriate elimination. Still, you might
want to look at www.declawing.com, and the AVMA statement on
delclawing (http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/apr03/030415c.asp). Or
not, because these sites do not condone declawing.

I have no insight as the owner of a declawed cat though; it is an
insight my conscience will never let me have.

Steve.
ceb2 - 06 Oct 2004 16:22 GMT
> (...)
> > I know the general feeling among cat owners is that declawing is cruel
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> So, what are your reasons?

Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here
goes.
We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in
1960 and not renovated since. We completely redid the entire interior.
Every room. Walls, floors cielings. Bought all new furniture. Got the
cats while we were doing this. They scratch everything. Rugs, drapes,
furniture, and in some cases, even the walls. They have 2 scratching
posts which they sometimes scratch but they prefer the furniture and
other stuff. I then built them an enclosure in the garage with a kitty
door so they can get there at their will. It has many levels and
shelves and cubbies and tunnels. Completely upholstered and carpeted.
Rope tightly wound around all the wood beams for their scratching
pleasure.(I'll post pics on my sight if anyone cares to see)They use
it but still prefer the rest of the house. This wasn't a problem until
recently. My wife is a teacher and went back to work in the fall, and
my girls ent back to school, and I returned to work after a lengthy
layoff. When we were around, it wasn't a problem, a spray bottle
worked wonders as a dterent. We also tried double backed tape, citrus
sprays and other things to no avail. Now they have the place to
themselves and we se evidence of serious scratching. And climbing.
After we made the appointment, I was lyng in bed the other night and
heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered
walls and was clinging at the ceiling.

I have been against this and on many levels and still am, but my wife
is adamant. Color me out of whack, but here are my priorities:

1. My wife and girls
2. My own well-bing
3. Our home
4. The cats
5. The dog

Like I said, I know none of these reasons will be good enough for some
or all of you. That would probably be true even if I did have a blood
condition, or any other disorder, or if we frequently had babies and
toddlers around (which we do) and I only have to justify this to me
and mine, not you lot.

So there it is.

> Regarding your questions about behaviour post-declaw: Anecdotally,
> declaw is associated with various problems such as loss of litter
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Steve.

Overall, I would like to thank you Steve, for an intelligent response
to my information.
Cat Protector - 06 Oct 2004 17:02 GMT
Those reasons are not valid. You just solidify that you care more objects
than you do your cats which are living, breathing creatures. Then instead of
owning up to what you did, you blamed your wife (if you even have one). If
you were so against declawing and still went ahead with it then you prove
how cruel you really are. Normally I would not hope that someone else be
their human but I think this is an exception. Those cats deserved your love
and affection not coldness and cruelty. You are disgusting!

Signature

Cat Galaxy: All Cats! All The Time!
www.catgalaxymedia.com
"ceb2" <svendlho@aol.com> wrote in message > Ok, not that anyone in this NG
will think they are valid, but here

> goes.
> We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Overall, I would like to thank you Steve, for an intelligent response
> to my information.
KellyH - 06 Oct 2004 17:26 GMT
> Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here
> goes.
> We bought our first home last April. Nice house. But it was built in
> 1960 and not renovated since.

Nope, not a valid reason.

> We completely redid the entire interior.
> Every room. Walls, floors cielings. Bought all new furniture. Got the
> cats while we were doing this. They scratch everything. Rugs, drapes,
> furniture, and in some cases, even the walls.

While you were doing this renovation, did you take the cats into
consideration?  Select fabrics that they would be less likely to want to
scratch, more resistant to damage.  When we bought a new couch, we spent a
lot of time considering the fabric.

>They have 2 scratching
> posts which they sometimes scratch but they prefer the furniture and
> other stuff.

Are the scratching posts big and sturdy?

>I then built them an enclosure in the garage with a kitty
> door so they can get there at their will. It has many levels and
> shelves and cubbies and tunnels. Completely upholstered and carpeted.
> Rope tightly wound around all the wood beams for their scratching
> pleasure.(I'll post pics on my sight if anyone cares to see)They use
> it but still prefer the rest of the house.

This sounds lovely, but the cats are social and prefer to be with the
family.  You can't expect them to only do their scratching in one room.

>This wasn't a problem until
> recently. My wife is a teacher and went back to work in the fall, and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered
> walls and was clinging at the ceiling.

You have *upholstered* walls and you seriously expect the cats to leave them
alone?  Sorry, you can only expect the cats to conform but so much.  Maybe
you should have rethought your decorating scheme.

> I have been against this and on many levels and still am, but my wife
> is adamant. Color me out of whack, but here are my priorities:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 4. The cats
> 5. The dog

Yes, they are out of whack.  The cats should come before your home.

> Like I said, I know none of these reasons will be good enough for some
> or all of you. That would probably be true even if I did have a blood
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So there it is.

Even if you couldn't stop the cats from scratching inappropriately, did you
ever look into Soft Paws?  This would have solved a lot of your problems and
left the cats with their claws intact.
And, don't play "my cats' sob story is more heartbreaking than yours".  Not
gonna work on this group.  Just about everyone's cats on here has a sob
story.  Just because you rescued them doesn't give you the right to amputate
their toes.  If the cats were not able to live with their claws in your
home, you could have come on this group and asked for help rehoming them.
People here have moved cats across the country to get them to their forever
homes.  I would have helped.  I volunteer at a rescue group and could have
gotten them in.

Signature

-Kelly
kelly at farringtons dot net
www.kelltek.com
Check out www.snittens.com

PawsForThought - 06 Oct 2004 19:10 GMT
>From: svendlho@aol.com  (ceb2)

>Ok, not that anyone in this NG will think they are valid, but here
>goes.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>heard a soft cry. It was Grizabella, she had climed our upholstered
>walls and was clinging at the ceiling.

First of all, these are kittens, who most likely would have grown out of that
rambunctious stage.  Secondly, simple nail trimming would have helped.
Training would have helped.  It takes some effort on your part and your
family's part. Mutilating these poor animals should never have been an option.
I'm so sick of hearing from materialistic a.sholes.  You know what's funny?  I
have a very nice home with nice furniture and my cats don't destroy anything.
It's so simple, trimming claws and training.  It's not rocket science, but I
guess it is to some people.  Lazy people who make excuses and only want quick
fixes in life.  
________
See my cats:  http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecatjournal.com/articles/claws.htm
MacCandace - 06 Oct 2004 02:36 GMT
<< I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANTI DECLAWING FLAMERS NOR AM I LOOKING FOR A
DEBATE! >>

Bummer, you don't always get what you want, do you?  Just like I'm sure your
poor kitties want to have their digits amputated.  You're worried their
behavior will change; guess what, ya shouldn't have done it then. You might
luck out and all 3 will stay the same or maybe 2 will or 1 will or none will.
Time will tell.  I hope you don't decide to "get rid" of them as most people
who mutilate their cats do.

Candace
(take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

See my cats:
http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace

"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other
than human."  (Loren Eisely)
.oO rach Oo. - 06 Oct 2004 03:40 GMT
I have had one declawed cat. The reason for this was I was in college and
during the summer, wanted to get her fixed. My mother had to take her in for
the operation because I was working. When I picked her up, she had bandages
on her paws. When I asked why, the vet replied my mother had asked that she
be declawed too. I was furious. This is the only experience I have with a
declawed cat and yes it did change her personality. For some time after, she
seemed depressed and lethargic. It had nothing to do with the aesthetic but
I think she was in pain and depressed at her change in what is a natural
thing.

I won't flame you because you'll get enough of that and I don't have the
energy to. I just think that whatever is said now will be a case of shutting
the door after the horse has bolted off but think of this... when you take
the responsibility of an animal, you take them for what they are and their
n