Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue
CatKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

favorite purebred cat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bolo - 31 Aug 2004 03:16 GMT
I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 03:19 GMT
> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
> cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

I like my purebred alley cat because she goes with the curtains. :)
Sherry - 31 Aug 2004 04:48 GMT
>> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best

LOL, my favorite purebreds are the neutered ones.
Seriously, if I had to pick my favorite non-moggie, it would probably be the
Applehead Siamese or Maine Coon.

Sherry
-L. : - 31 Aug 2004 17:08 GMT
> >> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> >> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
>
> LOL, my favorite purebreds are the neutered ones.

No doubt.  Why pay hundreds or thousands for an inbred when they are
killing hybrids by the thousands?  Hybrid vigor and all that...

-L.
Phil P. - 31 Aug 2004 07:44 GMT
> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.

My favorite is the *only* truly purebred cat:

http://maxshouse.com/origin_domestication+biology/outofafrica/Felis_silvestris_l
ybica.jpg


I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena)

I suggest you have echocardiograms done on both cats as soon as possible
since hyperthrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is prevalent in both breeds.

http://www.winnfelinehealth.org/reports/cardiomyopathy.html
http://www.ragdoll-cats.com/Cardio.htm

http://petplace.netscape.com/articles/artShow.asp?artID=148

http://wgnradio.com/shows/pet/cat%20disease.htm

Development and progression of inherited hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in
Maine Coon cats.   J Vet Internal Med, Vol 10, No 3, p 165, 1996.

and I think they are the best
> cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

The breed with the most (18) documented genetic defects is the Siamese
followed by the Persian and Burmese.

Brachycephalic Airway Syndrome - Persians and Himalayans have the most worst
conformation.  Now that's a particularly nasty defect that didn't even exist
in nature until some moron decided cats should have flat faces, round heads,
and short thick necks..  Maybe he was trying to create a cat in his own
image.

The respiratory muscles of these cats have to generate more force to produce
airflow through the narrowed air passages.  This can result in barotrauma to
the mucosal lining of the airways.  In severe cases the respiratory muscles
become fatigued which can result in ventilatory failure. Brachycephalic dogs
especially the English bulldog - which usually requires surgery (Pekingese,
shih tzus, Lhasa apsos, shar peis) can have the same problem.

Manx and Manx mixes are prone to rectal prolapse and sacrocaudal dygenesis
(malformation of the sacrocaudal vertebre) - probably as a result from
tailless breeding.  Now that was a stroke of pure stupidity; breeding cats
without a tail...  Cats use their tails for balance.

The list goes on but I'm too nauseated to continue.
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 08:00 GMT
> > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.
>
> My favorite is the *only* truly purebred cat:

http://maxshouse.com/origin_domestication+biology/outofafrica/Felis_silvestris_l
ybica.jpg


> I have a male
> > ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena)
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> The list goes on but I'm too nauseated to continue.

*and the crowd went wild*

Go, Phil.
dgk - 31 Aug 2004 14:43 GMT
>> > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
>Go, Phil.

I'm part of that crowd. Still, one of my little devils is some sort of
Maine Coon derivative I would guess. What a wuss. The size of a small
freight train and scared of his shadow. Makes a great mop.
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 16:10 GMT
> >> > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> Maine Coon derivative I would guess. What a wuss. The size of a small
> freight train and scared of his shadow. Makes a great mop.

Aww, sounds like a cutie. I love *ALL* cats. I just don't want to
encourage people meddling and making more to some sort of
decorative or behavioral specs when I can still see the loving and
needy faces of the shelter cats every night before I go to sleep.
The ones I could not take.
Sherry - 31 Aug 2004 15:37 GMT
>The list goes on but I'm too nauseated to continue.

I'll help you.

PKD.
Hip Dysplacia (sp?)
That awful condition where their knee joints lock up. Can't remember the name.
Maine Coons are prone to all of these.

Sherry
Meg St. Clair - 31 Aug 2004 22:18 GMT
>> The list goes on but I'm too nauseated to continue.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sherry

Patellar subluxation (spelling)
Yngver - 31 Aug 2004 23:17 GMT
>> That awful condition where their knee joints lock up. Can't remember the
>name.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Patellar subluxation (spelling)

I've seen this condition in a couple of cats, but none of them were Maine
Coons. Obviously this condition can occur in any cat, whether or not purebred.
It is more commonly associated with larger, heavier cats and so one would
expect to see an association with the larger breeds, but also with larger cats
of mixed breed as well. At least with Maine Coons, there is a registry that
screens for this condition so that breeders can try to reduce prevalence by not
breeding affected cats. With a mixed breed cat you are not likely to know
whether the cat has inherited a risk factor.
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 16:15 GMT
> > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.
>
> My favorite is the *only* truly purebred cat:

http://maxshouse.com/origin_domestication+biology/outofafrica/Felis_silvestris_l
ybica.jpg


What's the story on this cool cat?
Phil P. - 31 Aug 2004 23:02 GMT
> > > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.
> >
> > My favorite is the *only* truly purebred cat:

http://maxshouse.com/origin_domestication+biology/outofafrica/Felis_silvestris_l
ybica.jpg


> What's the story on this cool cat?

That absolute masterpiece, Felis Sylvestris Lybica (a/k/a African Wildcat)
is the ancestor of the domestic cat.
Steve G - 03 Sep 2004 00:19 GMT
(...)

> That absolute masterpiece, Felis Sylvestris Lybica (a/k/a African Wildcat)
> is the ancestor of the domestic cat.

Wonderful though it is, it's hardly a purebred cat...

Steve.
Phil P. - 03 Sep 2004 02:48 GMT
> (...)
> >
> > That absolute masterpiece, Felis Sylvestris Lybica (a/k/a African Wildcat)
> > is the ancestor of the domestic cat.
>
> Wonderful though it is, it's hardly a purebred cat...

LOL! It sure is! Pure bred by nature - not selectively bred and manipulated
to suit human whims.

> Steve.
Mary - 03 Sep 2004 03:01 GMT
> > "Phil P." <phil@maxshouse.com> wrote in message
> news:<RPednX9urOv-aKncRVn-jQ@giganews.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> LOL! It sure is! Pure bred by nature - not selectively bred and manipulated
> to suit human whims.

Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
"purebred" just means "inbred."
Phil P. - 03 Sep 2004 04:31 GMT
> > > "Phil P." <phil@maxshouse.com> wrote in message
> > news:<RPednX9urOv-aKncRVn-jQ@giganews.com>...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> "purebred" just means "inbred."

That's probably why purebreds are often more susceptible to disease.

Dr. Neils Pedersen, a world renowned expert on feline viral diseases said in
his book on feline infectious diseases:

"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."

The Bristol study confirmed that fact in which the prevalence of FIP in
purebreds was nearly twice that of DSH.  Prevelance was highest in the
Burmese followed by the Siamese.

Some people put too much value on that piece of paper.  Unless you actually
witness conception and birth, there's no guarantee the kitten actually came
from the parents named in the registration.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming the cats - I love all cats - I just have
a problem with breeders in general.

Phil
Steve G - 03 Sep 2004 16:22 GMT
(...)

> > LOL! It sure is! Pure bred by nature - not selectively bred and
> > manipulated to suit human whims.

I.e., it's not a purebred cat. You can say that yellow is green, but
yer lemons ain't going to taste like limes.

Like it or not, basically any living thing encountered by humans is
bred to suit our whims and desires. All livestock, all pets, plants,
the whole deal. Even the humble moggy has to adapt to the pressures of
human society - one reason why tabby cats are prevalent, indeed.

As you may guess, I have no real problem with this, except when
animals are bred that are fundamentally unfit for survival. For
example, hairless cats are unfit in a Darwinian sense - even the most
robust, the most perfect Sphynx, is not fit for purpose. It could not
survive in the Great Outdoors. On the other hand, cats such as
Siamese, Abys, Russian Blues, whatever, are not fundamentally flawed,
although they may often be so in reality, due to poor breeding
practices.

> Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> "purebred" just means "inbred."

It often is, although it does not have to be. In principle, a cat
created via controlled breeding could well be superior to the moggy.
Generally doesn't happen that way though - conformity seems to be
favoured over robustness. Hence the various problems many purebreds
suffer from.

Steve.
Yngver - 03 Sep 2004 18:52 GMT
>(...)
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>the whole deal. Even the humble moggy has to adapt to the pressures of
>human society - one reason why tabby cats are prevalent, indeed.

True. Whenever human beings interact with animals they influence breeding. Cats
would not have become domesticated without selective breeding, because the
cuter, friendlier cats were the ones most likely to get a handout from the
human beings who met with them, and therefore more likely to survive and pass
on their attractive, friendly genes.

>As you may guess, I have no real problem with this, except when
>animals are bred that are fundamentally unfit for survival. For
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>although they may often be so in reality, due to poor breeding
>practices.

I agree with you. Some of the historic breeds, that have been in existence for
hundreds of years, are (or were until recently) hardy, healthy breeds.

>> Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
>> "purebred" just means "inbred."
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>favoured over robustness. Hence the various problems many purebreds
>suffer from.

And it depends on the breed. Some breeds remain robust and have no particular
genetic defects associated with them. Some are generally hardier and more
long-lived than the average mixed breed cat, although that may be more due to
the overall genetic background of that breed than to the knowledge of the
breeder. While certainly the best breeders attempt to breed out genetic defects
and strengthen a breed, I think too few breeders know what they are doing well
enough to be able to do more good than harm.
Phil P. - 04 Sep 2004 01:57 GMT
> (...)
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I.e., it's not a purebred cat. You can say that yellow is green, but
> yer lemons ain't going to taste like limes.

Felis Sylvestris Lybica is the original - can't get any purer than that!
Steve G - 06 Sep 2004 20:30 GMT
(...)

> Felis Sylvestris Lybica is the original - can't get any purer than that!

Everything has a precursor. Except the primordial soup, maybe...

S.
Phil P. - 07 Sep 2004 00:47 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> S.

The primordial soup has long since coalesced - Felis Sylvestris Lybica is
still here - as it has been - *pure* - for thousands of years.

All other breeds are simply mutations of the original.
Yngver - 03 Sep 2004 16:36 GMT
>Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
>"purebred" just means "inbred."

Inbred like the semi-owned indoor/outdoor cats in our neighborhood? They are
all related to each other, either littermates or offspring, and since no body
around here every bothers to neuter their pets, they all just keep mating with
each other.

There is plenty of inbreeding going on among mixed breed cats.
Mary - 03 Sep 2004 16:51 GMT
> >Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> >"purebred" just means "inbred."
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> There is plenty of inbreeding going on among mixed breed cats.

Which does not at all mean that the practical definition of
"purebred" is "inbred."
Mary - 03 Sep 2004 16:55 GMT
> > >Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> > >"purebred" just means "inbred."
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Which does not at all mean that the practical definition of
> "purebred" is "inbred."

lol! I meant "Which does not at all mean that the practical definition of
"purebred" is NOT "inbred."
Phil P. - 04 Sep 2004 02:27 GMT
> >Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> >"purebred" just means "inbred."
>
> Inbred like the semi-owned indoor/outdoor cats in our neighborhood?

Not exactly.  The gene pool in naturally bred cats is so vast that they
still retain their hybrid vigor.  Genetic defects are also much less common
in naturally bred cats.
Mary - 04 Sep 2004 08:10 GMT
> > >Seems to me that when you get right down to it,
> > >"purebred" just means "inbred."
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> still retain their hybrid vigor.  Genetic defects are also much less common
> in naturally bred cats.

This is what anyone with a basic education in genetics would say.
Steve G - 06 Sep 2004 20:28 GMT
(...)

> This is what anyone with a basic education in genetics would say.

Someone with a more thorough understanding of genetics would say that
breeding does not necessarily (does not have to) lead to a loss of
vigour.

Steve.
Phil P. - 07 Sep 2004 00:45 GMT
> (...)
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> breeding does not necessarily (does not have to) lead to a loss of
> vigour.

Someone who is the "Director of the Center for Veterinary Genetics, which
has a rich environment for research training in genetic techniques" and is
considered an expert in feline genetics *did* say:

"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
Pedersen

> Steve.
Yngver - 07 Sep 2004 16:38 GMT
>"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
>probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
>Pedersen

And which strains of purebred cats are the fragile ones?
Phil P. - 08 Sep 2004 20:28 GMT
> >"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
> >probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
> >Pedersen
>
> And which strains of purebred cats are the fragile ones?

Compared to naturally bred cats - probably *all* of them.

I think Dr. Pedersen was speaking generally...
Yngver - 08 Sep 2004 21:12 GMT
>> >"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
>> >probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>I think Dr. Pedersen was speaking generally...

Then I have to agree with Steve G., that if he means some breeds may have
"fragile strains" that is probably true, but if he means purebred cats in
general, that cannot be true. Some breeds are quite hardy, and some "strains"
within various breeds are certainly hardy and long-lived.

In any case the reason some cats develop FIP while most do not is not well
understood. Dr. Pederson is merely offereing his own theory.
Phil P. - 09 Sep 2004 03:06 GMT
> >> >"Fragile strains of purebred cats are often more susceptible to FIP,
> >> >probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >
> Then I have to agree with Steve G.,

That's ok, I don't mind.

> In any case the reason some cats develop FIP while most do not is not well
> understood.

The immunologic responsiveness of the cat is one of the crucial factors.
Genetic susceptibility factors might also play a large roll.  The Bristol
study showed a higher prevelance in purebred than natural-bred cats with the
Burmese taking first place followed by the Siamese.  Some lines of Persians
and Birmans also have enhanced susceptibility to FIP.

> Dr. Pederson is merely offereing his own theory.

I'd say it a little more than just a theory...

Foley JE, Pedersen NC: The inheritance of susceptibility to feline
infectious peritonitis in purebred catteries.
Feline Pract 24:14-22, 1996.

I'd say his theories are highly credible since he's one of, if not *the*
foremost FIP researchers in the world!  A lot of his work in FIP involves
purebred cats because of their increased susceptibility.
Steve G - 09 Sep 2004 17:47 GMT
(...)

> I'd say it a little more than just a theory...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> foremost FIP researchers in the world!  A lot of his work in FIP involves
> purebred cats because of their increased susceptibility.

However, things are not quite as you suggest...

From http://www.winnfelinehealth.org/health/FIP.html

"A genetic predisposition to the development of FIP was identified by
Drs. Foley and Pedersen in 1996. They examined pedigree and health
data from 10 generations of cats in several purebred catteries and
found that the heritability of susceptibility to FIP could be very
high (about 50%). It is likely a polygenetic trait rather than a
simple dominant or recessive mode of inheritance. Inbreeding, by
itself, is not a risk factor. Selecting for overall disease resistance
is a helpful tool for breeders"

Note - Inbreeding itself is not a risk factor. Poor breeding practices
are - i.e., repeatedly breeding from lines that suffer from the
genetic defect.

Or, using an analogy, from time to time, bad science is carried out.
However, this does not mean that all science is bad and that science
should be stopped forthwith.

It is also possible to breed for enhanced health. For example, IIRC,
there is a lot of research into breeding chickens for improved immune
systems - presumably so that they can be crammed into teeny tiny cages
with less chance of succumbing to illness.

Steve.
Yngver - 09 Sep 2004 18:38 GMT
>(...)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>systems - presumably so that they can be crammed into teeny tiny cages
>with less chance of succumbing to illness.

Furthermore, I point out that no doubt the reason Dr. Pederson studied the
heritability of susceptibility to FIP in purebred catteries is that it would be
quite difficult, if not impossible, to examine pedigree and health data from 10
generations of random bred, non-pedigreed cats, wouldn't it? This is the case
with many studies conducted on genetic health links; the health and lineage
data exists for purebred cats so that's the group of cats that are studied.
Phil P. - 09 Sep 2004 21:39 GMT
> >(...)
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >> foremost FIP researchers in the world!  A lot of his work in FIP involves
> >> purebred cats because of their increased susceptibility.

> Furthermore, I point out that no doubt the reason Dr. Pederson studied the
> heritability of susceptibility to FIP in purebred catteries is that it would be
> quite difficult, if not impossible, to examine pedigree and health data from 10
> generations of random bred, non-pedigreed cats, wouldn't it?

No.  Research colonies are often kept for generations specifically to rule
out/in genetic susceptibility.
Phil P. - 09 Sep 2004 21:39 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> However, things are not quite as you suggest...

Things are exactly as I suggest.   The Bristol study supports me.
Steve G - 10 Sep 2004 22:16 GMT
(...)

> Things are exactly as I suggest.   The Bristol study supports me.

Available research does not support the statement that breeding of
purebred cats invariably leads to an increase in genetic defects.
Indeed, in the abstract from Foley & Pederson, the authors state:

'Cat breeders might achieve success in reducing FIP risk by selecting
cats from less susceptible lineages for their breeding programs.'

Note that they do not say 'cat breeders must stop controlled breeding
in order to reduce FIP risk'.

Steve.
Yngver - 10 Sep 2004 22:53 GMT
>(...)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Steve.

So apparently, as we surmised, when Pederson talks about "fragile strains" of
purebred cats, he does not mean all purebred cats.
Phil P. - 11 Sep 2004 03:24 GMT
> (...)
> >
> > Things are exactly as I suggest.   The Bristol study supports me.
>
> Available research does not support the statement

Sure, Steve whatever you say.  You ought to know... LOL!

>  'Cat breeders might achieve success in reducing FIP risk by selecting
> cats from less susceptible lineages for their breeding programs.'
>
> Note that they do not say 'cat breeders must stop controlled breeding
> in order to reduce FIP risk'.

Yeah, I know.  They said  "cat breeders **might** achieve success in
reducing FIP risk by selecting
cats from less susceptible lineages".  *Might* doesn't sound very
reassuring, and "susceptible lineages" seems to mean, well, entire lineages
are susceptible - ah yes, "line breeding".  Imagine that - entire lineages
being susceptible to FIP!  Now that's a scary thought!  I wonder what
breeders do with those lineages... You know how terrified breeders are of
being known to have FIP in their cat factories.

From your Winn reference:   "The likely defect in immunity to FIP is in
cell-mediated immunity. Therefore cats that are susceptible to FIP are also
likely susceptible to some other infections as well, especially fungal and
viral infections. "
Wow! Imagine that, entire lineages have defects in CMI that makes them
susceptible to all kinds of diseases!  Entire lineages...

You don't have much actual experience working with cats and vets, other than
your own, do you?  It doesn't seem like you do  Almost every vet I've worked
with or even knew in the last 40 years, including my vet whose a
double-boarded, retired veterinary professor, were of the opinion that
generally purebred cats are more susceptible to disease.  These are vets who
work with just about all the breeds of cats on a day to day basis for
decades.  My experience working with cats for >40 years on a day-to-basis
tends to makes me agree with them. You can bob and weave in your
philosophical debates all you want, but nothing but nothing beats real life
practical field experience and empirical evidence.

I really don't have the time (or desire) to engage in one of your
philosophical debates (that's really all you seem to do here).  Come to
think of it, you never seem to actually talk about cats or offer any useful
advice.  Do you even have any cats?

Oops, your 10 minutes are up.  Time flies when you're having fun.
Mary - 11 Sep 2004 03:43 GMT
> "Steve G" <news@stevethepsycho.co.uk> wrote in message
>  Come to  think of it, you never seem to actually talk
> about cats or offer any useful advice.  Do you even
> have any cats?

Steve once said "You may assume what you like. I shall make no statements
one way or the other regarding my cats. It's much more amusing to watch
people project ..."

But I do think he mentioned having more than one cat in another thread, at
least one being a breeder cat and one being a stray.

I enjoy the arguments, but my gut tells me Steve is a pro-breeder guy who
actually does let his cats out in a busy urban area. I would mind but I feel
sure that Steve will go directly to hell upon issuing his last breath. If
there is a hell. And if there isn't, as one man once said, there damned well
ought to be.
Steve G - 11 Sep 2004 23:17 GMT
(...)

> Steve once said "You may assume what you like. I shall make no statements
> one way or the other regarding my cats. It's much more amusing to watch
> people project ..."

I did. That was in the context of whether I allow my cats to go
outdoors or not.

> But I do think he mentioned having more than one cat in another thread, at
> least one being a breeder cat and one being a stray.

She rememebered! I feel all emotional.

> I enjoy the arguments, but my gut tells me Steve is a pro-breeder guy who
> actually does let his cats out in a busy urban area.

Well, the former is (obvously) true to some extent but I'm certainly
not universally pro-breeder, and there are several breeds I do not
believe should exist. I also think that breeding should be much more
tightly controlled than it is, and that Joe Public should not be able
to set up a breeding concern basically on a whim. FWIW (piece of
chewing gum and a bit o'string, probably).

> I would mind but I feel
> sure that Steve will go directly to hell upon issuing his last breath.

I'll be sure to carry around a bag of marshmallows in my dotage, so
that when the inevitable happens, I'll have something nice to toast.

Anyway, thanks once again for your kind thoughts.

Steve.
Mary - 12 Sep 2004 00:39 GMT
> (...)
> >
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Anyway, thanks once again for your kind thoughts.

Well now, Steve, if you let your kitties roam in a busy urban
area, you deserve these thoughts. Relax, the last I heard
the verdict is still out on Heaven and Hell actually existing.
Steve G - 11 Sep 2004 23:08 GMT
(...)

> Sure, Steve whatever you say.  You ought to know... LOL!

You know, for a while I was worried that we'd get several responses
from you but no LOLs at all. All's well now.

(...)

> > Note that they do not say 'cat breeders must stop controlled breeding
> > in order to reduce FIP risk'.
>
> Yeah, I know.  They said  "cat breeders **might** achieve success in
> reducing FIP risk by selecting cats from less susceptible lineages".  
> *Might* doesn't sound very reassuring,

Shrug. That's the way science is written - if it ain't been fully
tested, then 'might' it is.

> and "susceptible lineages" seems to mean, well, entire lineages
> are susceptible - ah yes, "line breeding".  Imagine that - entire lineages
> being susceptible to FIP!  

Yes, that is basically what they are saying (although not for all
breeds necessarily).

(...)

> From your Winn reference:   "The likely defect in immunity to FIP is in
> cell-mediated immunity. Therefore cats that are susceptible to FIP are also
> likely susceptible to some other infections as well, especially fungal and
> viral infections. "
> Wow! Imagine that, entire lineages have defects in CMI that makes them
> susceptible to all kinds of diseases!  Entire lineages...

The quote continues:

"Therefore cats that are susceptible to FIP are also likely
susceptible to some other infections as well, especially fungal and
viral infections. **This finding gives breeders the ability to achieve
success in reducing the risk of FIP by using pedigree analysis to
select breeding cats from family backgrounds that have strong
resistance to FIP and other infectious diseases.**"

Emphasis added.

> Almost every vet I've worked
> with or even knew in the last 40 years, including my vet whose a
> double-boarded, retired veterinary professor, were of the opinion that
> generally purebred cats are more susceptible to disease.  

I do not disagree that some lines (or even breeds) are more
susceptible to disease, what I'm saying is: i) not all lines (or
breeds) are susceptible, and ii) susceptibility is not an effect of
breeding per se (or even inbreeding per se); it is an effect of poor
breeding practices (re. the Winn URL).

> These are vets who
> work with just about all the breeds of cats on a day to day basis for
> decades.  

Parenthetically, many vets own purebred cats. Make of that what you
will.

(...)

> I really don't have the time (or desire) to engage in one of your
> philosophical debates (that's really all you seem to do here).  

Well, no-one's coercing you, and I'm not about to wander up to your
neck of the woods, stand over you and twat you upside the face with a
herring until you reply. The wonders of usenet - you're free to STFU
when you like, as am I.

> Come to
> think of it, you never seem to actually talk about cats or offer any useful
> advice.  Do you even have any cats?

What are these 'cats' of which you speak? Is this not
rec.pets.duckbilledplatypus?

> Oops, your 10 minutes are up.  Time flies when you're having fun.

'bye then. It's been special, like special needs education.

Steve.
Steve G - 08 Sep 2004 00:28 GMT
(...)

> > Someone with a more thorough understanding of genetics would say that
> > breeding does not necessarily (does not have to) lead to a loss of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> probably because of decreased overall disease resistance."  Dr. Neils
> Pedersen

And someone who said that is NOT disagreeing with my above statement,
viz. 'breeding does not necessarily (does not have to) lead to a loss
of vigor'. Poor breeding practices can (and do) lead to problems, but
good breeding practices will not. Your (referenceless) cite has bugger
all to say about this.

Incidentally (as Yngver points out elsewhere), the statement by
Pedersen is ambiguous in the above context: Does he suggest that *all*
purebreds are fragile, or that breeds exist that are fragile? The
latter is a reasonable statement, the former is likely not.

Steve.
Yngver - 07 Sep 2004 16:37 GMT
>Not exactly.  The gene pool in naturally bred cats is so vast that they
>still retain their hybrid vigor.  Genetic defects are also much less common
>in naturally bred cats.

Even when you have several generations of sibling to sibling and parent to
offspring matings going on? Responsible breeders generally would not allow
matings between such closely related cats, but if you say this small pool of
neighborhood cats is retaining their "hybrid vigor," okay. They don't appear to
be very healthy cats, but possibly that is more because they are not fed well.
It's true the patriarch of the family has lasted about five years now. I don't
think most of them have lasted long enough to find out what sort of genetic
health problems they may have inherited.
Phil P. - 08 Sep 2004 20:28 GMT
> >Not exactly.  The gene pool in naturally bred cats is so vast that they
> >still retain their hybrid vigor.  Genetic defects are also much less common
> >in naturally bred cats.
>
> Even when you have several generations of sibling to sibling and parent to
> offspring matings going on?

Yep! Its been that way for throusands of years.

> Responsible breeders

"Responsible breeders" is an oxymoron.  A truly responsible breeder wouldn't
breed until there's a shortage of cats.  Is there a shortage of cats
somewhere?

generally would not allow
> matings between such closely related cats,

How do you know?  Unless you witness the mating and birth, you can't know.

I forgot, breeders call inbreeding "line breeding" - sounds better to them.

.
but if you say this small pool of
> neighborhood cats

I didn't say anything about your neighborhood cats.
Yngver - 31 Aug 2004 16:58 GMT
>probably as a result from
>tailless breeding.  Now that was a stroke of pure stupidity; breeding cats
>without a tail...  Cats use their tails for balance.

As though breeders thought up the idea of creating the tailless Manx cat.
Manx-type cats have been observed since the 1500s, and of course are named for
the Isle of Man where they have been common for at least 200 years, and
considered indigenous. So if you feel that the creation of the Manx was a
stroke of stupidity, you must blame nature instead.
Phil P. - 31 Aug 2004 23:01 GMT
> >probably as a result from
> >tailless breeding.  Now that was a stroke of pure stupidity; breeding cats
> >without a tail...  Cats use their tails for balance.
>
> As though breeders thought up the idea of creating the tailless Manx cat.
> Manx-type cats have been observed since the 1500s, and of course are
named for
> the Isle of Man where they have been common for at least 200 years, and
> considered indigenous.

The Manx is mutation of the island's domestic cats.

So if you feel that the creation of the Manx was a
> stroke of stupidity, you must blame nature instead.

I didn't say breeders created the Manx.  I should have said its a stroke of
stupidity to intentionally breed cats that are prone to painful genetic
defects.

Nature occasionally makes mistakes.
dgk - 01 Sep 2004 20:28 GMT
> So if you feel that the creation of the Manx was a
>> stroke of stupidity, you must blame nature instead.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Nature occasionally makes mistakes.

More exactly, nature constantly makes mistakes. Many are spontaneously
aborted, often before anyone even knows they are fertilized.

Some mutations are not functionally significant. The vast majority are
bad. A few are good.

I would guess that, as organisms approach an ideal configuration for
their environment, the higher the percentage of mutations that are
bad.

Still, it would be pretty cool to have a tail.
Yngver - 01 Sep 2004 22:31 GMT
>> So if you feel that the creation of the Manx was a
>>> stroke of stupidity, you must blame nature instead.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Still, it would be pretty cool to have a tail.

Yes, nature generally takes care of its mistakes by not letting them survive.
If one considers the Manx cat a mistake of nature, it is one that has managed
to survive and perpetuate itself for hundreds of years before breeders put a
hand in it. The Manx is what I would consider a natural breed; in other words,
the breed arose naturally rather than having been created by breeders
attempting to create a tailless cat.

Taillessness is not necessarily associated with genetic defects. The Japanese
Bobtail, an even more ancient breed of cat, and another natural breed, is
generally regarded as a healthy breed of cat with no specific genetic problems.
Phil P. - 02 Sep 2004 01:34 GMT
> Yes, nature generally takes care of its mistakes by not letting them survive.
> If one considers the Manx cat a mistake of nature, it is one that has managed
> to survive and perpetuate itself for hundreds of years before breeders put a
> hand in it.

That's not entirely accurate.

"A spontaneous mutation occurred at some point several hundred years ago,
which created kittens born without the vertebrae that form the tail of
normal cats. With the passage of centuries and due to the isolation of the
cats from outside breeding, the taillessness eventually became a common
characteristic among the Isle of Man cats"

"Other breeds of cats occasionally produce a kitten with a missing tail. The
Manx, however, is the only cat that is bred to be tailless."
http://www.fanciers.com/breed-faqs/manx-faq.html#history
-L. : - 02 Sep 2004 06:29 GMT
> > So if you feel that the creation of the Manx was a
> >> stroke of stupidity, you must blame nature instead.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Some mutations are not functionally significant. The vast majority are
> bad. A few are good.

Not true.  Most mutations aren't significant.  For example, each human
has, on average, 7 true genetic mutations.   There is a ton of DNA in
each genome that isn't in frame with any coding region.  And even if
the mutation occurs within a coding region, most point mutations are
tolerated.

-L.
Brigitte - 31 Aug 2004 15:13 GMT
> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
> cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

Scottish Fold
Meg St. Clair - 31 Aug 2004 15:34 GMT
> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
> cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

I have a beautiful Chartreaux. Her name is Spot (Actually it's Nous
nours Bleu Rapture but, I mean really). She's a big girl, about 10
pounds, slate grey with gold eyes. Not a lap cat but likes to be near
me, follows me around the house. Ever night around 11p, she comes into
my bedroom, pats me on the face for treats, then curls up on her corner
of the bed.

Although when seriously stressed (having blood drawn) she screams, she
doesn't meow. She opens her mouth and sometimes a little squeak comes
out.

She travels with me regularly, by car. I take her to my boyfriend's
house when I go there for the weekends (180 miles). She doesn't seem to
mind going to a different house. I took her with me when I drove to my
parents' (1000 miles).

Like her French farm cat forebearers, she's a great mouser. (We live in
an old house. Mice get in. Of course, having a live mouse dropped on
your back at 4am is not so much fun.) She gets along beautifully with
the older DSH male who also lives in the house.
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 16:14 GMT
> > I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> > ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> nours Bleu Rapture but, I mean really). She's a big girl, about 10
> pounds, slate grey with gold eyes.

Pictures!
Meg St. Clair - 31 Aug 2004 22:20 GMT
>>> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>>> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Pictures!

http://homepage.mac.com/megsaint/PhotoAlbum1.html
Mary - 31 Aug 2004 22:29 GMT
> >>> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> >>> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/megsaint/PhotoAlbum1.html

OMG!! Is she as sweet as she looks? This is a truly beautiful girl. I love
the rounded shape of her head and her pretty little muzzle. Now we need some
stories to go with the pics!
Meg St. Clair - 31 Aug 2004 23:59 GMT
>>>> I have a beautiful Chartreaux. Her name is Spot (Actually it's Nous
>>>> nours Bleu Rapture but, I mean really). She's a big girl, about 10
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the rounded shape of her head and her pretty little muzzle. Now we need some
> stories to go with the pics!

I hadn't realized how rare this breed of cat was until after I had
gotten her. (For all of those of you out there who would prefer that
people adopt cats from shelters: Around the time I got Spot, I also
rescued an abandoned kitten, paid huge vet bills to have her brought
back to full health, medicated her  several times a day  and then found
a loving home for her. Her name is Mimi.)

Spot has the ability to vanish into other dimensions, probably the one
with the socks. When we have parties, she is shut in my bedroom as she
doesn't like small children and will hide somewhere I can't find her
and I get agitated. One night, I came into my room at the end of the
night and... no cat. I looked under everything, in the closets, under
the bed, behind the radiator. No cat. I thought perhaps an inquisitve
toddler had let her out. I searched the house. No cat. I decided to
calm down and wait.  Ten minutes later, she was sitting next to the
bed. The door to the bedroom was still shut...

We have to be careful because, as she doesn't meow, she will just sit
where she gets stuck until we find her. Stuck would include a door that
is mostly closed but not latched. I've never before had a cat who
couldn't figure out how to open a door!
Cheryl - 01 Sep 2004 02:39 GMT
In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Meg St. Clair
<megsaint@earthlink.net> artfully composed this message within
<news:2004083118594250073%megsaint@earthlinknet> on 31 Aug 2004:

> We have to be careful because, as she doesn't meow, she will
> just sit where she gets stuck until we find her. Stuck would
> include a door that is mostly closed but not latched. I've never
> before had a cat who couldn't figure out how to open a door!

Is she just really mellow that she doesn't meow?  She is beautiful; I
had a look at your pics.

Signature

Cheryl

Meg St. Clair - 01 Sep 2004 03:08 GMT
> In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Meg St. Clair
> <megsaint@earthlink.net> artfully composed this message within
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Is she just really mellow that she doesn't meow?  She is beautiful; I
> had a look at your pics.

Actually, it's a breed characteristic. Some of them chirp. She "meeps"
occaisionally, never gets to the full meow, though. Mostly just opens
her mouth a little as if she were meowing but no sound. The only other
cat I ever had who did that was one who had been abandoned before she
was weaned. She never learned to meow properly or do a lot of other
normal cat things. But with Chartreaux, it's normal.
Cheryl - 01 Sep 2004 03:37 GMT
In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Meg St. Clair
<megsaint@earthlink.net> artfully composed this message within
<news:2004083122081211272%megsaint@earthlinknet> on 31 Aug 2004:

>> In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Meg St.
>> Clair <megsaint@earthlink.net> artfully composed this message
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> meow properly or do a lot of other normal cat things. But with
> Chartreaux, it's normal.

My RB cat Shadow didn't have a meow. He had some sounds earlier on,
but he had surgery that ruined any sound that he tried to make and
he did what you described, didn't try to meow. He grunted, and when
he was upset by one of the other cats he would try to hiss but even
that never came out.  All of the years he was with me, he never
really vocalized. I wonder if he had some genes in him from a breed
that didn't make sounds. He sure did purr, though. You could hear
him from across the room.  :)

Signature

Cheryl

MadHatter - 31 Aug 2004 22:46 GMT
>>>> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>>>> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/megsaint/PhotoAlbum1.html

aawwww, she is beautiful! such a lovely color and i've never seen such
gorgeous bright gold eyes!
my Shaina looks like a Russian blue, except for a white patch on her
tummy and a small one on her chest.  she is a mix, obviously, but a
very beautiful mix.  i want to get a Russian Blue friend for her.

-L
Yngver - 31 Aug 2004 23:05 GMT
>aawwww, she is beautiful! such a lovely color and i've never seen such
>gorgeous bright gold eyes!
>my Shaina looks like a Russian blue, except for a white patch on her
>tummy and a small one on her chest.  she is a mix, obviously, but a
>very beautiful mix.  i want to get a Russian Blue friend for her.

I have seen Chartreux at cat shows and they have a that distinctive silver
shimmer to the plush fur. These pictures do a good job of illustrating the
unique qualities of the Chartreux. Sometimes they are confused with the British
Shorthair (blue) but the coat quality and shape of the nose are not the same.
Meg St. Clair - 01 Sep 2004 00:04 GMT
>> aawwww, she is beautiful! such a lovely color and i've never seen such
>> gorgeous bright gold eyes!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> unique qualities of the Chartreux. Sometimes they are confused with the British
> Shorthair (blue) but the coat quality and shape of the nose are not the same.

As I understand it, in the UK, they are considered the same brred as
the British Shorthairs. But in the pictures I've seen they do seem to
have a different face shape.

I sent the pictures to the breeder who said she was sorry she hadn't
kept her for breeding. When I got Spot's registration papers, TICA had
mad a mistake and instead of it saying "Not for Breeding" under her
name, it says it under mine!
Cheryl - 01 Sep 2004 02:40 GMT
In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Meg St. Clair
<megsaint@earthlink.net> artfully composed this message within
<news:2004083119045043658%megsaint@earthlinknet> on 31 Aug 2004:

>  When I got Spot's registration papers, TICA had
> mad a mistake and instead of it saying "Not for Breeding" under
> her name, it says it under mine!

LOL

Signature

Cheryl

Yngver - 01 Sep 2004 16:52 GMT
>As I understand it, in the UK, they are considered the same brred as
>the British Shorthairs. But in the pictures I've seen they do seem to
>have a different face shape.

Here's what it says on the CFA site:
"Chartreux and British Blues
Some cat books claim that the Chartreux is the same cat as the British Blue,
or that it "once was a separate breed, but has now become identical to the
British Blue." This is not true. Not only do the two breeds have different
physical and temperamental characteristics, but pedigree research and blood
typing confirms that the breeds have distinct ancestry. These books are
referring to the confusing use of the name "Chartreux" by certain European cat
clubs to refer to the British Blue.
In 1970, FIFe (the European federation of cat fanciers) decided to assimilate
the Chartreux with the British Blue under the name "Chartreux" but with the
breed standard of the British Blue. This decision came about because many of
the member countries were not interested in the Chartreux as a breed, but
preferred the name "Chartreux" with its long history to the less interesting
name "blue British Shorthair." They sought to save the name and apply it to
another breed.
Chartreux breeders protested, and in 1977, FIFe overturned its earlier
decision and returned to separate registries and standards for the two breeds.
However, since the 1970s, a few "independent" (non-FIFe) European cat clubs
have continued to use the name "Chartreux" for the blue British Shorthair, or
for the blue European Shorthair, or for hybrids between these breeds and the
Chartreux. This practice is more common in those countries like Germany where
there are fewer genuine Chartreux available."
*******
I know a British shorthair breeder and once you get to know them and the
Chartreux, there are a number of distinctive differences between the two
breeds. There are similarities too, but people familiar with the breeds would
not mistake one for the other. Chartreux have a distinctive look in the face
and nose, that's hard to explain.
Orchid - 31 Aug 2004 16:50 GMT
>I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
>cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

    Bengals!  :D  They're awesome, wonderful, outgoing, bright
cats, and seriously not for everyone.  :)

    Of course, I'm biased.

Orchid
See Orchid's Kitties! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/bengalpage
Want a Purebred Cat?  Read This! -- http://nik.ascendancy.net/orchid
Steve G - 03 Sep 2004 00:31 GMT
(...)

>     Bengals!  :D  They're awesome, wonderful, outgoing, bright
> cats, and seriously not for everyone.  :)
>
>     Of course, I'm biased.

I think that Bengals are perhaps my second favorite breed, my fave
being Abys. On the other hand, I've seen nowt but pictures of many
breeds, and I do like the appearance of Cornish Rexes, Ocicats,
Savannahs and other oddities I'll never meet.

On the other (moggy) hand, I like any (big) tabby (one of my cats is a
big Maine coonalike) and cats with grey / blue coloration.

Actively dislike any of the flat-faced abominations, also Sphynxes and
the like.

FWIW,
Steve.
nobody@junk.min.net - 31 Aug 2004 22:18 GMT
>I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the
>best cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

Traiditional Siamese.

Alan

Signature

---------------------------------------------------------------------
** Please use address alanh77[at]comccast.net to reply via e-mail. **

Posted using registered MR/2 ICE Newsreader #564 and eComStation 1.1
 
  BBS - The Nerve Center Telnet FidoNet 261/1000 tncbbs.no-ip.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Meg St. Clair - 01 Sep 2004 00:07 GMT
>> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the
>> best cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.
>
> Traiditional Siamese.

> Alan

One of my favorites. However, I decided one extremely vocal cat (a huge
male DSH) was enough for one household.
soft - 01 Sep 2004 00:01 GMT
>I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
>ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/04

I don't know about what breed is my favorite - I do have a maine coon
and he was a great addition to our family - but I also have the 3 non
pure breed cats that I rescued and I wouldn't send any of them back -
they all are great and unique...
Karryl
http://www.i-love-cats.com/meow/soft63389/index.htm
Phil P. - 01 Sep 2004 08:11 GMT
I would like to hear about other purebreds.

This cat was surrendered to a county shelter as a bitter after she was
declawed.  She didn't even have a scratching problem before she was
declawed.  Imagine a cat being declawed, then being surrendered because she
became a biter after being declawed... How's that for a horror story?

We rehomed her twice - both times she was returned because of biting, then I
adopted her.  It took about a year, now she's out smooches all my other
cats!  She still gives little love nips when she gets excited but never
breaks the skin - so does my girlfriend so I'm used to it.

She looks like a Turkish Angora - all white with blue eyes (no, she's not
deaf) - a real knockout!

http://maxshouse.com/Ours/Suggie.jpg

Phil
Karen Chuplis - 01 Sep 2004 14:53 GMT
> I would like to hear about other purebreds.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Phil

Awww. So pretty. And just the opposite color of MY Sugar!
Mary - 01 Sep 2004 15:40 GMT
> > I would like to hear about other purebreds.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> Awww. So pretty. And just the opposite color of MY Sugar!

I love the look on her face. What a doll.
Phil P. - 02 Sep 2004 03:57 GMT
> > > I would like to hear about other purebreds.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I love the look on her face. What a doll.

Thanks.  Actually, all my ladies are knockouts!

http://maxshouse.com/Ours/Phil's%20Fabulous%20Felines.JPG
Mary - 02 Sep 2004 04:19 GMT
"Phil P." <phil@maxshouse.com> wrote > > > Awww. So pretty. And just the
opposite color of MY Sugar!

> > I love the look on her face. What a doll.
>
> Thanks.  Actually, all my ladies are knockouts!
>
> http://maxshouse.com/Ours/Phil's%20Fabulous%20Felines.JPG

Oh, they are! You like girlie cats too. :-) I'll post some
of my girls as soon as my camera gets here. I love your
tabbies, that is what my Cheeky is, but she is very light
grey.
Meg St. Clair - 02 Sep 2004 15:27 GMT
> She looks like a Turkish Angora - all white with blue eyes (no, she's not
> deaf) - a real knockout!
>
> http://maxshouse.com/Ours/Suggie.jpg
>
> Phil

She is gorgeous!

Meg
Theresa - 01 Sep 2004 15:03 GMT
> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
> cats in the world but I would like to hear about other purebreds.

I love Persians. They are so laid back andloving. But, as many people
have said on this newsgroup, they have been inbred and solive do not
live very long lives. My latest Persian does not have the flat face
and I hope that the breeders are getting away from that abomination. I
also have a 21 year old "alley cat" who has a cast iron immune system.
She is thriving!

> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/04
Karen Younge - 03 Sep 2004 01:23 GMT
Hands down, my favorite is the Silver Persian (with the Golden a very close
second). The first time I saw those  green eyes, it was all over.
Karen

> I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/04
Yngver - 03 Sep 2004 16:42 GMT
>Hands down, my favorite is the Silver Persian (with the Golden a very close
>second). The first time I saw those  green eyes, it was all over.
>Karen

When I was a kid, the Silver Persian aka Chinchilla was my favorite breed of
cat. My aunt had one. Everyone in our family thought she was the most beautiful
cat we had ever laid eyes on. Back then the Silvers for some reason had doll
faces, not the flatter faces that most of the other colors had. Nowadays when I
see them at cat shows they seem to have the same flat faces the other Persians
have, although the extreme flat faces seem to have gone out of fashion.
Cat Protector - 12 Sep 2004 02:30 GMT
I think cats that come from shelters are the best! All three of mine were
rescues. Isis is a Bombay, Jade is a Diluted Tabby, and Icarus is a Japanese
Bobtail.

>I was just wondering what everybodies favorite purebred is.I have a male
> ragdoll (Max) and a female maine coon (Xena) and I think they are the best
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/04
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.