> > This article says that it does:
> > http://www.veterinarypartner.com/Content.plx?P=A&C=&A=516&SourceID=42
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> a while (we have not discussed how long) we can go ahead with the
> radioactive iodine treatment.
This osunds like a good plan, to me.
My *guess* is that at least a couple of months will be considered. It often
takes a while for the thyroid levels to get to normal levels, & the dosage
sometimes needs to be fiddled with. In the meantime, blood will be drawn
periodically to check the various levels.
> I appreciate everyone's help with this. Although in a perfect world all vets
> would know everything there is to know, I am still happy with mine because
> he at least listens. Now that he knows, he can try other cats who show
> elevated liver enzymes on Tapazole to make certain their hyperthyroid is not
> masking kidney disease.
No one person can know *everything*, no matter their credentials &/or level
of intelligence. It'd be impossible for a medical doctor, & then vets need
to know about more than one species! This is also what I like about my main
vet: she is very intelligent, reasons things out & also explains her
reasoning to me, looks up whatever is not crystal-clear in her mind, when
prudent thinks beyond the practice where she is & will reach out to other
specialists in different locales for info - referred me to an vet
internist/oncologist, & called a liver specialist at Cornell, & will look
further into something if I bring it up as a possibility. (As long as it
doesn't turn out to be ludicrous!; in which case she'll - nicely &
patiently - explain to me why it can't be thus-&so.)
Cathy
Mary - 20 Jul 2004 00:15 GMT
> My *guess* is that at least a couple of months will be >considered. It
oftentakes a while for the thyroid levels >to get to normal levels, & the
dosage sometimes needs >to be fiddled with. In the meantime, blood will be
drawn
> periodically to check the various levels.
Makes sense. I will want them to check fairly regularly, because I'll be
worried that she really may have liver disease that the Tapazole may
exacerbate. Every two weeks seems reasonable. I'm sure he will tell me and I
will pass it on when he does.
> No one person can know *everything*, no matter their >credentials &/or
level of intelligence. It'd be impossible >for a medical doctor, & then
vets need to know about >more than one species!
Absolutely. I don't buy into the "Doctor as a Supreme Being" BS, so I don't
expect him to know everything. He just said, "have you got an article that
demonstrates this? I don't know *everything.*" I think another vet might
have blustered or "pooh-poohed" me when I brought this up.
>This is also what I like about my main vet: she is very >intelligent,
reasons things out & also explains her
> reasoning to me, looks up whatever is not crystal-clear >in her mind, when
prudent thinks beyond the practice >where she is & will reach out to other
specialists [snip]
She sounds a lot like my vet. He takes the time to explain things to me and
he LISTENS to me. Best of all I can tell he genuinely cares about the
animals, and he is pretty good at choosing techs who clearly do too. I can
tell by the way they handle the animals, the way they look at them and talk
to them. It's not phony "patronize the stupid client," either. I have seen
the latter in other vets, as well as a helluva lot of techs who obviously
cared nothing about the animals.