Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / February 2007
IV for teeth cleaning?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
crash - 26 Jun 2004 00:38 GMT My two cats (ages 13 and 12) are going in next week for a dental cleaning. The 13 year-old (Kitty) also needs a tooth extracted. The last time I got this done (different vet), it cost $700+ for the two of them (a couple extractions). The vet ran all kinds of blood tests and an IV. I felt $700 was a bit much, so this time I resolved to skip the blood tests and the IV. But the new vet also "strongly" advises that I do the blood tests and IVs. So I'm facing another $450 or so this time (at least it's not $700, I guess).
My questions:
1) Do you have any opinions on whether the bloodwork and IV are necessary? Hell, I didn't get that stuff last time I went under at the dentist.
2) Do you also do everything the vet strongly advises you to do? I mean, I don't want to skimp on the health care, but $700 (or $450) is a lot for me right now.
Thanks in advance
Crash (Dave)
~*Connie*~ - 26 Jun 2004 01:51 GMT Do you have to do it? no. Is it a good idea.. yes. At those ages, it is better to know of an underlying medical condition before going under anesthesia. The IV will help provide fluids and a direct entry if there are any issues and they need to administer medications or glucose.
If they were my cats, I wouldn't risk it. I'd shell out the money. If it is a financial burden, do only one cat at a time.
> My two cats (ages 13 and 12) are going in next week for a dental > cleaning. The 13 year-old (Kitty) also needs a tooth extracted. The [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Crash (Dave) Mary - 26 Jun 2004 02:45 GMT >My questions: > >1) Do you have any opinions on whether the bloodwork and IV are >necessary? Hell, I didn't get that stuff last time I went under at >the dentist. You have to do bloodwork on older cats, generally over 10. I find it's good to do bloodwork for the heck of it every once in a while and teeth cleaning is every once in a while. Bloodwork is $35to$80 depending on how many tests they do, and where.
>2) Do you also do everything the vet strongly advises you to do? I >mean, I don't want to skimp on the health care, but $700 (or $450) is >a lot for me right now. I pay $55 for a cat dental not including xrays. They generally don't need xrays. Anesthesia is $80 but I have a vet that does it without anesthesia if the cat's okay with it. If your cat doesn't pass the blood test, cleaning without anesthesia will have to be done. He'll also give you antibiotics which are about another $10.
I don't do everything my vet tells me to do. Vets such as VCA recommend a ton of tests just to rack up fees. After having many cats over many years, I have a good idea about what makes sense and what's a waste of money. Sometimes they also request extra tests just cover their behinds legally.
Cheryl - 26 Jun 2004 03:05 GMT In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", Jun 2004:
> I don't do everything my vet tells me to do. Vets such as VCA > recommend a ton of tests just to rack up fees. After having many > cats over many years, I have a good idea about what makes sense > and what's a waste of money. After using VCA for almost 2 years and spending tons of $$ on tests that led nowhere (and ended with referrals and further tests), I finally found a vet who doesn't run tests as often as they did and goes by her instinct and experience. She hasn't been wrong yet even after I asked to have Shadow's blood work done recently and she thought it wasn't necessary based on his appearance and appetite. She was right, tests were all normal. All of my cats are doing well now with their various problems just by treating the obvious symptoms. If the symptoms suggested underlying problems that aren't already known, I'll trust her suggestion to do those further tests. VCA is the worst thing to happen to animal "care" IMO.
 Signature Cheryl
Laura R. - 26 Jun 2004 06:22 GMT circa Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:05:02 -0500, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, Cheryl (jlhshadow@nospamhotmail.com) said,
> After using VCA for almost 2 years and spending tons of $$ on tests > that led nowhere (and ended with referrals and further tests), I [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > already known, I'll trust her suggestion to do those further tests. > VCA is the worst thing to happen to animal "care" IMO. How have I managed to have never heard of VCA before this week? Is this like an HMO for pets? A chain clinic? Whatever it is, it sounds *terrible* from everything I've seen people posting in the various cat groups.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
Wendy - 26 Jun 2004 12:17 GMT > circa Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:05:02 -0500, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, > Cheryl (jlhshadow@nospamhotmail.com) said, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Laura I gather VCA is a nationwide 'franchise'?
My vet went VCA a year or so ago. They do REQUIRE blood work before administering anesthesia unless the animal has had the tests run already recently. The blood work runs $60. It probably isn't a bad idea but I tend to get my back up when someone 'requires' something. I guess I'd rather they recommend and then make a good case for it.
One improvement since VCA took over is a vet on staff who does acupuncture and is familiar with homeopathic remedies. I took Tigger to see her last winter and she recommended trying some other things before laying out the big bucks for acupuncture so I can't say they ALL go for the wallet first.
We have two VCA facilities around here that I know of. Both seem to work to keep the costs down for rescued cats. Although mine doesn't work directly with a rescue group, I have taken two litters up there to get checked out for various reasons and they examined all (4 kittens/litter) for the price of 1. The other VCA in the area is the one that works with the rescue group. They recently offered space at the facility (for free) for the rescue group to house some of their cats when they lost their space at PetSmart. They also do all the rescue group's spay/neuters and testing for reduced prices.
My vet did charge almost $600 to treat and finally euthanize Ralf last fall when he went into total kidney failure suddenly. That covered all the testing to find out what was wrong, the treatment (IVs, X-rays, meds, most of a day in the hospital, etc) and putting him to sleep. I don't know if that charge is over the top or not. The only point of comparison is when I took Mabel up there with a similar problem 20 years ago and the charge was $130.
I get Tigger's Cosequin from them because they charge the same as I'd pay online.
Do they care about the cats? I don't know but I've seen two of them close to tears when they aren't able to save a cat and have to put them down. The vet we usually deal with had to have been on the phone with me at least 6 times during the day when Ralf was up there keeping me posted on what was going on with him and called to let me know how Boots was after he was neutered. If they take X-rays they show them to you and explain what you're looking at. When they told us the kittens had ear mites they showed them to me under the microscope.
One negative IMO is that they do declaw. I've never had them suggest it but have heard they do them.
Both of these facilities had long term established practices going before they affiliated with VCA.
W
Laura R. - 26 Jun 2004 18:52 GMT circa Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:17:42 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, Wendy (wendypart@nospam.com) said,
> My vet did charge almost $600 to treat and finally euthanize Ralf last fall > when he went into total kidney failure suddenly. That covered all the > testing to find out what was wrong, the treatment (IVs, X-rays, meds, most > of a day in the hospital, etc) and putting him to sleep. Alex's euthanasia and cremation was $300, so the above doesn't sound unreasonable to me. From the rest of your post, though, it sounds like this clinic is the exception to what I've seen about VCA from all the other posts I've read.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
Sherry - 26 Jun 2004 14:54 GMT >How have I managed to have never heard of VCA before this week? Is >this like an HMO for pets? A chain clinic? Whatever it is, it sounds >*terrible* from everything I've seen people posting in the various >cat groups. > >Laura I'd heard of VCA, but only through a couple of past postings on this group. I hope it's not a trend that will eventually be commonplace. It sounds like something to run from. AFAIK, there are no VCA clinics here.
Sherry
Mary - 26 Jun 2004 17:54 GMT >>How have I managed to have never heard of VCA before this week? Is >>this like an HMO for pets? A chain clinic? Whatever it is, it sounds >>*terrible* from everything I've seen people posting in the various >>cat groups. In my area of Los Angeles VCA came in and bought all the little animal hospitals. They also offer insurance. They were responsible for letting one of my cats Lucky die during the LA riots. They said the police told them not to go to the animal hospital so no one took care of the animals. My cat died from lack of care, so did the other animals in emergency. The police never told them that emergency vets had to abide by curfew. They just got their schedules mixed up. Then they had the nerve to send me a huge bill which was beyond their estimate by $1,200. I sued them and won. VCA is big business. I prefer privately owned vets. They don't have to abide by large corporation values. Large corporations buy a business, try to turn it into the biggest money maker they can to make shareholders happy at any cost. The cost is the animals sometimes.
Laura R. - 27 Jun 2004 02:47 GMT circa 26 Jun 2004 16:54:16 GMT, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, Mary (mmmaryinla@aol.comspam) said,
> >>How have I managed to have never heard of VCA before this week? Is > >>this like an HMO for pets? A chain clinic? Whatever it is, it sounds [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > they can to make shareholders happy at any cost. The cost is the animals > sometimes. Good lord. Like I said, I hear a *lot* of horror stories.
:-( Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
Sherry - 27 Jun 2004 03:41 GMT >In my area of Los Angeles VCA came in and bought all the little animal >hospitals. They also offer insurance. They were responsible for letting one [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >they can to make shareholders happy at any cost. The cost is the animals >sometimes. On the other end of the spectrum, we have a brand-new vet in the county, opened a new practice by himself...this is a young guy who is *so* enthusiastic and caring. Unfortunately, he lacks experience and isn't the best cat-vet around. Someday, I think he will be, though. I just hope by then he isn't as jaded and money-driven as the rest of the vets here.
Laura R. - 27 Jun 2004 04:19 GMT circa 27 Jun 2004 02:41:21 GMT, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, Sherry (sriddles@aol.comkitty) said,
> On the other end of the spectrum, we have a brand-new vet in the county, opened > a new practice by himself...this is a young guy who is *so* enthusiastic and > caring. Unfortunately, he lacks experience and isn't the best cat-vet around. > Someday, I think he will be, though. I just hope by then he isn't as jaded and > money-driven as the rest of the vets here. Give me a vet who has the desire and the will over one who has the knowledge and experience but no genuine passion for animals, any day.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
KellyH - 27 Jun 2004 02:13 GMT > How have I managed to have never heard of VCA before this week? Is > this like an HMO for pets? A chain clinic? Whatever it is, it sounds > *terrible* from everything I've seen people posting in the various > cat groups. > > Laura If you go to their website, you can "Find a VCA Animal Hospital near you!" and find out if any of your local vet hospitals are VCA. http://vca.know-where.com/vca/ I've never heard of them either until now. I didn't bother reading their whole website. Personally, I don't like the idea of a vet hospital being part of some national company, buying up small, independent practices. I'm very relieved to see that my vet, and the shelter's vet, are not affiliated with VCA.
 Signature -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net Check out www.snittens.com
Laura R. - 27 Jun 2004 03:03 GMT circa Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:13:42 GMT, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, KellyH (Kelly@whatever.com) said,
> If you go to their website, you can "Find a VCA Animal Hospital near you!" > and find out if any of your local vet hospitals are VCA. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > independent practices. I'm very relieved to see that my vet, and the > shelter's vet, are not affiliated with VCA. Thanks for the info! There are about a dozen of these joints in NY, with two in Manhattan and three in Staten Island. Not a one in Brooklyn, Queens or the Bronx. Let's hope it stays that way.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
MacCandace - 27 Jun 2004 03:39 GMT << If you go to their website, you can "Find a VCA Animal Hospital near you!" and find out if any of your local vet hospitals are VCA. http://vca.know-where.com/vca/ >>
I've never heard of them either until recently on this ng. I just checked out the website and was relieved to find only 5 in the greater Phoenix area. I also hope the trend to buy up small practices does not grow; they sound awful.
Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)
See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace
"One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely)
-L. : - 29 Jun 2004 05:18 GMT > In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", > Jun 2004: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > already known, I'll trust her suggestion to do those further tests. > VCA is the worst thing to happen to animal "care" IMO. Not just VCA - although they are pretty bad. We just found out our 12 year old border collie mix has an inoperable spinal tumor - one that should have been diagnosed a year before (when it possibly could have been removed) when I took her in for odd symptoms. Of course it was the elderly vet with tons of experience and a good gut instinct that found it (a vet I just discovered), not the money-hungry VCA-esque duo I had her at the year before. They were also the ones who wanted me to spend $800 to diagnose Peewee's giant hairball. Some vets just suck, big time...
-L.
Cheryl - 29 Jun 2004 22:21 GMT In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", 2004:
> Not just VCA - although they are pretty bad. We just found out > our 12 year old border collie mix has an inoperable spinal tumor > - one that should have been diagnosed a year before (when it > possibly could have been removed) when I took her in for odd > symptoms. I'm so sorry that happened, Lyn. :( Is he still with you now?
Of course it was the elderly vet with tons of
> experience and a good gut instinct that found it (a vet I just > discovered), not the money-hungry VCA-esque duo I had her at the > year before. They were also the ones who wanted me to spend > $800 to diagnose Peewee's giant hairball. Some vets just suck, > big time... Yes they do. I'm amazed by all the horror stories about vets. Having been the "victim" of one also, it infuriates me to hear about it, though there are horror stories about people-doctors, too. It's a relief to find one (vet) that seems to really be good; I'm going to keep her.
 Signature Cheryl
-L. : - 30 Jun 2004 04:15 GMT > In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav", > 2004: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I'm so sorry that happened, Lyn. :( Is he still with you now? She is doing great on Rimadyl - pretty amazing since we thought we might have to euth her a month ago...
> Of course it was the elderly vet with tons of > > experience and a good gut instinct that found it (a vet I just [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > too. It's a relief to find one (vet) that seems to really be good; > I'm going to keep her. Ditto here...if we can ever quit moving, LOL...
-L.
Kelly - 26 Jun 2004 03:32 GMT > I pay $55 for a cat dental not including xrays. They generally don't need > xrays. Anesthesia is $80 but I have a vet that does it without anesthesia if > the cat's okay with it. If your cat doesn't pass the blood test, cleaning > without anesthesia will have to be done. He'll also give you antibiotics which > are about another $10. Doing a proper dentistry without anesthetic is impossible. Without the anesthetic it's only considered a minor scaling and cleaning, in which case they do not get under the gumline, which is the most important part. Paying for any kind of dental work without anesthetic is pointless for the tooth health of a cat.
Kelly
Mary - 26 Jun 2004 04:09 GMT >Doing a proper dentistry without anesthetic is impossible. Without the >anesthetic it's only considered a minor scaling and cleaning, in which case >they do not get under the gumline, which is the most important part. Paying >for any kind of dental work without anesthetic is pointless for the tooth >health of a cat. There are a few different types of nonanesthetic dental cleaning. If a non-vet does it, they don't go under the gumline and that's useless. That's where all the bad stuff is. If a vet does it, he will go under the gum line. I watched part of a procedure once. They can use topical and local anesthetic like lidocaine so it's easier on the cat. A non-vet can't. They generally put them under completely if they can because it's safer for the vet and vet techs. They're less likely to be bitten and scratched. I wish they would use topical anesthetics for us humans when we get our teeth cleaned.
Laura R. - 26 Jun 2004 06:21 GMT circa 26 Jun 2004 01:45:56 GMT, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, Mary (mmmaryinla@aol.comspam) said,
> >2) Do you also do everything the vet strongly advises you to do? I > >mean, I don't want to skimp on the health care, but $700 (or $450) is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > without anesthesia will have to be done. He'll also give you antibiotics which > are about another $10. Don't forget the extraction(s) the OP mentioned- those cost extra.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
Sethran - 29 Jun 2004 17:51 GMT >> I pay $55 for a cat dental not including xrays. They generally don't need
> xrays. Anesthesia is $80 but I have a vet that does it without anesthesia if > the cat's okay with it. If your cat doesn't pass the blood test, cleaning > without anesthesia will have to be done. He'll also give you antibiotics which > are about another $10. All dentals SHOULD have x-rays, though this is very rarely done. Most of the damage to the tooth occurs out of sight.
I can't imagine a vet doing a dental without anesthesia. I'm not saying you haven't experianced this...but I just can't fanthom it. The best way to do a dental is with an ultrasonic cleaner. The pick uses water to cool its surface. That water is filled with plague off the teeth and bacteria. The animal would be swallowing that water if it were awake. How does the vet reach the inside of the teeth? If he isn't using an ultrasonic cleaner and is using manual tools, he's leaving thousands of little grooves in the surface of the tooth. An ultrasonic does this too, just not quite so badly. Polishing is absolutely required to erase those grooves and prevent plague from adhereing to them. How is he polishing an awake animal without them swallowing it? Even with manual tools, how is he keeping the animal from swallowing bacteria filled plague? What if a tooth has a problem? Is he removing it is an awake animal? How? How does he get under the gumline? How does he get under the gumline on the back side of the tooth, which would already be quite hard to reach?
I've just never heard of this. There's too many chances for the animal to be swallowing some truly nasty stuff. There's also the matter of pain involved and reaching under the gumline where everything nasty actually is. Sounds rather like a scam to me. There's just no way an awake dental could come anywhere close to a dental done asleep. If that was the only problem I could see doing it on animals who can't go under because something is better than nothing. But doing it awake puts the pet in danger.
Sethran (who is a certified dental tech)
Karen Chuplis - 26 Jun 2004 02:56 GMT > My two cats (ages 13 and 12) are going in next week for a dental > cleaning. The 13 year-old (Kitty) also needs a tooth extracted. The [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Crash (Dave) Wow. That is *awfully* expensive. I know I have a good vet but my cat had all his molars extracted and had to stay 3 days and it was 250.00. My mother has had teeth extractions and cleanings on her older cats (with blood tests - I don't recall needing IVs) and her vet is much more expensive and I'm sure it wasn't more than a couple of hundred dollars. Is this the same vet?? The teeth *need* attention. They can cause very bad health problems and even lead to early death, but can't you get some prices on some other vets? At that age, the cats also do need the blood tests to make sure all is OK for the anesthesia. Still, I think that is very excessive pricing.
Kelly - 26 Jun 2004 03:30 GMT 13 and 12 years old means your cats are seniors, and they will need to be treated accordingly. My brother's 14 year old cat just went in for dentistry and extractions. We also went with the IV and pre anesthetic blood testing (which actually showed she had kidney problems so it was good that we did it). Similar to you, it cost almost 600 dollars for her (in Canadian funds which would probably equate to what it cost you in US funds).
I highly recommend the IV fluids and testing. Sometimes when I vet recommends something it might be okay to go without, but when it gets to "strongly recommend" I would give it some serious thought (which is what you're doing so that is good).
Go with what the vet says.
Kelly
> My two cats (ages 13 and 12) are going in next week for a dental > cleaning. The 13 year-old (Kitty) also needs a tooth extracted. The [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Crash (Dave) Yngver - 28 Jun 2004 16:30 GMT >I highly recommend the IV fluids and testing. Sometimes when I vet >recommends something it might be okay to go without, but when it gets to >"strongly recommend" I would give it some serious thought (which is what >you're doing so that is good). I agree. My cat is only 7, so the vet did not do pre-anesthetic bloodwork but he did use an IV during the dental procedure (she had three extractions.) From my understanding, the IV helps reduce the risk of a bad reaction to the anesthesia and so does pre-anesthesia bloodwork. My cat had a bad reaction anyway so I wish that we had done the bloodwork first rather than later when trying to diagnose what went wrong. It took her nearly a month to recover and return to normal.
In short, whether or not you want to pay for the bloodwork or IV depends on what value you place on reducing medical risk to your cats.
Laura R. - 26 Jun 2004 06:19 GMT circa 25 Jun 2004 16:38:45 -0700, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, crash (dcw6363@aol.com) said,
> My questions: > > 1) Do you have any opinions on whether the bloodwork and IV are > necessary? Hell, I didn't get that stuff last time I went under at > the dentist. With 12 and 13 year old cats, *absolutely*. Those tests are designed to ensure that the cats' renal and liver functions are adequate to clear the anesthesia from their systems, among other things. The last thing you want is to find out that your cat couldn't handle anesthesia by the cat dying during the cleaning. Unless you've had quite recent blood panels done for your cats, I'd go with your vet's recommendation.
> 2) Do you also do everything the vet strongly advises you to do? I > mean, I don't want to skimp on the health care, but $700 (or $450) is > a lot for me right now. It depends on how much I trust the vet and whether or not what they're suggesting makes sense. If I don't trust the vet or if they recommend things that seem excessive, then I find a new vet.
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
hpickering@austin.rr.com - 28 Jun 2004 17:17 GMT >My two cats (ages 13 and 12) are going in next week for a dental >cleaning. The 13 year-old (Kitty) also needs a tooth extracted. The [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > >Crash (Dave) 1) I would get the blood work done. I had a kitten that went in for the "big snip" and the vet did some bloodwork before the operation. She found a problem with him that required some medication. It was not a serious one, though. Just a little anemia. He was an abandoned kitten when I found him. Probably was not eating too regular. He showed no signs of being anemic. Ate good, played, tormented the other two cats, usual kitten stuff. I am glad they did the bloodwork on him. He probably would not be littering my house with bird parts now. 2) Short answer YES. If it real serious I get a second opinion, my vet does not mind.
Sethran - 29 Jun 2004 17:40 GMT > My questions: > > 1) Do you have any opinions on whether the bloodwork and IV are > necessary? Hell, I didn't get that stuff last time I went under at > the dentist. Yes. If I was your vet I wouldn't even give you the option to refuse. Your cats are old enough to have problems with their kidneys or liver and the dental could make it worse. I would also suggest that you get a presurgical EKG because they are well old enough to have heart issues.
> 2) Do you also do everything the vet strongly advises you to do? I > mean, I don't want to skimp on the health care, but $700 (or $450) is > a lot for me right now. Your vet is suggesting these things for a good reason. People have gotten into the habit of thinking that anesthesia is safe. It isn't. Anesthesia is ALWAYS a risk. Even a young, perfectly healthy animal can die under it. There is no way to eliminate the risk of anesthesia. However, you can help minimize it. Bloodwork will let your vet know if there are any problems with the internal organs. The best-case scenario if your cat has already developed liver or kidney issues is that the dental causes them to flair up and progress faster. Worse case is your pet dies on the table. The IV is needed is case something does go wrong...it provides instant access to the bloodstream for meds.
In fact, you should be very happy you have a vet who cares enough about the safety of your pet to try and make everything as safe as possible. You should be asking other questions as well. Will your vet be using a blood pressure monitor during the entire procedure? Blood pressure is the most important single thing to monitor, even above heart rate. Will he be monitoring pulse ox? EKG during surgery? For the price he'd really better be doing those things. That's what high prices pay for...the monitoring equipment. He most likely won't be doing the procedure himself, as it really is a tech thing, so ask how much experience the staff has. Will pain meds be given after the surgery (yes, having a tooth removed hurts)? What about protection from infection? Considering their ages, should the cats be on IV fluids overnight and will they be on fluids during the procedure?
You can do a dental for under a hundred dollars. But is it going to as safe and as effective? I highly doubt it. Think of it this way...when you go into surgery you don't get any choice about blood tests or monitoring. It's simply required. Why? Because they know full well that even if you appear perfectly healthy the risk of dying is real. Your cats deserve the same level of care and safety. I know it can be a burden but ask about payment options or doing one cat at a time. A dental seems like a minor, little thing. It isn't. It is a surgical procedure and complications are far from unheard of. Take the time, do some research, shop around, and then pick a vet who will provide the best care possible at a reasonable price. The price may be higher than you think but if it increases your chance of coming home with a live cat...it is worth it in the end.
Sethran (whose clinic requires iv caths but does not yet require bloodwork...something which will hopefully change soon)
hpickering@austin.rr.com - 29 Jun 2004 18:04 GMT >> My questions: >> [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] >Sethran (whose clinic requires iv caths but does not yet require >bloodwork...something which will hopefully change soon) Very good answers. You imparted a whole bunch of information that I did not know. Thank you
Cheryl - 29 Jun 2004 22:48 GMT In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav",
> The price may > be higher than you think but if it increases your chance of coming > home with a live cat...it is worth it in the end. >> > Sethran (whose clinic requires iv caths but does not yet require > bloodwork...something which will hopefully change soon) Thanks for the info. I've archived this to use later. I've only had to have one dental for one cat over the years and didn't know what to ask. He did fine, no extractions but I wouldn't have thought to ask about pain management.
 Signature Cheryl
furrball9 - 23 Feb 2007 00:16 GMT Can you please clarify what you mean by (what you wrote) "The best-case scenario if your cat has already developed liver or kidney issues is that the dental causes them to flair up and progress faster."
Are you saying that; A) Bad dental hygine can cause kidney issues to develop faster or B) The dental cleaning process can cause the kidney issue to develop faster?
Your wording is freaking me out...i have a dental appt Saturday any my cats creatinine is 2.5
>> My questions: >> [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] >Sethran (whose clinic requires iv caths but does not yet require >bloodwork...something which will hopefully change soon) crash - 02 Jul 2004 15:22 GMT Thanks to all for the replies. I went with the bloodwork and the IV. In fact they're both in surgery right now. I was leaning towards doing what the vet said, but it was nice to hear that the blood tests etc. are a good idea for older cats. Plus it's only money. I'd just spend it on scotch anyway.
This morning was an interesting one--lots of stuffing pills down throats and stuffing cats into cages. I hope the extractions aren't too painful for them.
thanks
Dave
Brandy??Alexandre - 03 Jul 2004 04:38 GMT crash <dcw6363@aol.com> wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:
> Thanks to all for the replies. I went with the bloodwork and the > IV. In fact they're both in surgery right now. I was leaning [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Dave My neighbor just had extractions on his 12-year old siamese. Three of them, in fact. The vet told him that one of them had been cracked with a chip missing. He felt really bad because he hadn't been keeping up with her dental, but the vet herself had to do an extraction on her cat 6 months after a cleaning. Things can go wrong in a short amount of time and there's no knowing when the problem occurred. The neat thing is the vet provided printouts of before and after pictures with the report. It *looks* painful with stitches and such, but...
Back to my point, he thought she'd be really down and in pain for days afterward, but he said she has been much brighter and active than she's been in a long time. Chances are her teeth hurt for a while and having them out is just soooo much better. So don't worry too much about it.
 Signature Brandy??Alexandre http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx Well, would you? --- Why are people with closed minds first to open their mouths?
Laura R. - 03 Jul 2004 05:58 GMT circa 2 Jul 2004 07:22:59 -0700, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav, crash (dcw6363@aol.com) said,
> Thanks to all for the replies. I went with the bloodwork and the IV. > In fact they're both in surgery right now. I was leaning towards > doing what the vet said, but it was nice to hear that the blood tests > etc. are a good idea for older cats. Plus it's only money. I'd just > spend it on scotch anyway. And the scotch is gone much faster than the cats. :-)
Laura
 Signature Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes. -Oscar Wilde
|
|
|