>Well, we finally ran out of the Science Diet Savory Cuts Ocean Fish. I
>bought some of the chicken, but she just ain't thrilled. She's wasted
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>to order 24. I'm glad that's not the vet I was considering for her if
>that's how attentive they are.
soft <soft63389@netscape.net> wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:
> I use to feed Netro - I did not really have complaints until I
> switched to the hairball formula. Then my cats started throwing it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Karryl
That's the issue with Kami--she likes to chew her food. It's difficult
to find a chunky we food, much less one she will eat. The in-store vet
at Petsmart carries the Waltham Renal, but they're changing over to
Royal Canin (same, but different). They don't have their stock of
pouches yet and Kami has to eat. These Nutro Natural Choice Complete
Care pouches appear close to the Waltham formula, if someone can help
with the way they do the analysis. The Nutro pouches are 85 grams and
the analysis is done as percentages--protein 8.0% min., phosphorous
0.20% max., sodium 0.08% max. Waltham is a measurement of grams and
lists analysis per 100 grams though the pouch is only 85 grams: protein
8.68, phosphorous 0.14, and sodium 0.12.
Of course, the Science Diet values were lower than the Nutro, and the
k/d values lower than the Waltham Renal. It makes me wonder what the
absolute max allowable values are for a CRF cat when you're weighing
not eating the best against not eating enough.

Signature
Brandy??Alexandre
http://www.swydm.com/?refer=BrandyAlx
Well, would you?
---
Why are people with closed minds first to open their mouths?
Joe Canuck - 29 May 2004 22:29 GMT
Brandy Alexandre wrote:
> soft <soft63389@netscape.net> wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> lists analysis per 100 grams though the pouch is only 85 grams: protein
> 8.68, phosphorous 0.14, and sodium 0.12.
Min & Max figures. You are looking at the guaranteed analysis which is
not an accurate indication of what is actually in the food.
You need to be looking at the proximate analysis on a dry matter basis.
> Of course, the Science Diet values were lower than the Nutro, and the
> k/d values lower than the Waltham Renal. It makes me wonder what the
> absolute max allowable values are for a CRF cat when you're weighing
> not eating the best against not eating enough.

Signature
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck