>> This made me happy I live in NC.
>>
>> http://wral.com/news/state/story/2649115/
>
> That's a great start--hopefully other states will follow suit. Thanks for
> posting this!

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>> This made me happy I live in NC.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> possessions. Even if the vet killed the cat, all she could have gotten was
> whatever dollar amount the court thought the cat was worth. Ugh.
That is awful--could the vet be reported to the licensing board? I'm no
lawyer but it seems if the vet did a procedure, especially an elective one,
against the owner's wishes, there should be some legal recourse. I would
never take another animal to that vet again. That's just terrible. Our vet
hospital doesn't do "routine" declaws and I've never been asked if I'd want
any of my cats declawed but I guess there are some places that still do.
I don't suppose there is much of a dollar amount for a cat, especially a
mutt cat. It's harder to measure the value of a pet--the companionship, the
health benefits(!), the comfort of a warm, fuzzy, purring thing sitting on
your lap; it's just quantifiable.
Enough rambling, thanks again!
Bonnie
22brix - 30 Mar 2008 20:13 GMT
>>>> This made me happy I live in NC.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the health benefits(!), the comfort of a warm, fuzzy, purring thing
> sitting on your lap; it's just quantifiable.
Should be NOT quantifiable!
Sorry,
Bonnie
cybercat - 30 Mar 2008 20:59 GMT
> That is awful--could the vet be reported to the licensing board? I'm no
> lawyer but it seems if the vet did a procedure, especially an elective
> one, against the owner's wishes, there should be some legal recourse.
She would not do it. She did not want to make waves, after all, he was
so sorry. He did not even refund the money for the spays, the least he
could do in my opinion. I backed off, as she clearly did not want to
pursue anything.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com