 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsCat AnecdotesHealth and BehaviorRescue CatKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Cat Forum / Health and Behavior / January 2008UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in 2006
UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in 2006 2,981. Thats how many dogs, cats, puppies, kittens, and other "companion animals" died needlessly at the hands of PETA employees in 2006. According to the group's own records, PETA employees killed more than 97 percent of the flesh-and-blood creatures in their care that year. Compare that with the Norfolk (where PETA is based) Society for the Protection of Animals, which euthanized only 38 of the 1404 animals placed in their care that year. Even the Norfolk city pound managed to release or adopt out more than half the number of animals it euthanized. While PETA collects millions in donations by pretending to advocate for the welfare of animals, the group has killed 17,400 pets since 1998. Some animals are killed in PETA headquarters and stored in a giant walk-in freezer. Others are killed in roving death vans and tossed into dumpsters. In fact, less than three percent of the animals handed over to People for the "Ethical" Treatment of Animals actually survive. http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ > Others are killed in roving death vans and tossed into dumpsters. In > fact, less than three percent of the animals handed over to People for > the "Ethical" Treatment of Animals actually survive. It is very clear, here in the Hampton Roads area which hosts the PeTA headquarters, that PeTA is a radical vegatarian organization. The only reason they can use the word "animals" in their name is that they consider eating animals to be unethical. If your concern is for animals, find another charity. Jerry  SignatureMy cat and I are very much alike: we're both gray, we're both fat, and we both dig in his litter box. >UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in >2006 [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ A message from the anonymous donors of the food and restaurant industry. Totally unbiased of course. >>UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in >>2006 [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > A message from the anonymous donors of the food and restaurant > industry. Totally unbiased of course. http://www.consumerdeception.com/ >>>UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in >>>2006 [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > >http://www.consumerdeception.com/ Thanks for the site. That is some nasty bastard. >http://www.consumerdeception.com/ Granted, Rick Berman is a vulture. But are the figures wrong? It seems to me that PETA doesn't need any profiteering spin monger to discredit them; they do a very thorough job of blunting their own message and ceased to have any credibility years before Berman got them in his sights. If they want to get serious about going after food industry atrocities, they will have to cease taking in companion animals at all. SignatureWayne M. > UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in > 2006 [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ Thanks for that info, although anyone knows that the biggest hypocrites are usually the biggest preachers... I had their number from the get-go. IBen Getiner > UPDATE: PETA Killed Over 97 Percent of the Animals in their Care in > 2006 [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ PETA stopped being an ethical organization back in the early 80s. They became a magnet for the whack jobs who perverted the original mission and turned the organization into the equivalent of a religious cult. At one time I respected them and supported them, now I try to alert people as to their true nature. They are not at all pro animal, they are extraordinary ego-centric head jobs who direct their extreme narcissism (not a one of them does not think they *are* God) through something seemingly respectable like animal rights. And they truly destroy the animal rights argument in the process. If you point out that their behavior is so utterly indefensible they will just scoff at you and go do it again. When you tell them it is causing governments to treat the whole concept of animal rights as a terrorist philosophy they brush it off and call themselves "abolitionists." They cause vastly more harm than they create good. Paul Narcissism and Ideologies http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal45.html http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq47.html Animal Rights http://samvak.tripod.com/animal.html Take care. Sam |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.